SELF GOVERNMENT: We've been thinking of Kevin Drum this week!

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2026

He was an American journalist: We start with a speculation about the late Kevin Drum:  

He would have loved to see this.   

Last Tuesday night, he would have loved to see the election results roll in. Almost surely, he would have loved the beauty of the messaging which had emerged from the emerging talent—from the new, newly scrappy faces and names who were suddenly winning elections. 

("Talent" is a word we rarely use. We're willing to use it to describe the week's emerging public figures.)   

As reported here by his wife ("with a heavy heart," in a Health Update), Kevin left this life in early March of last year. It was a gloomy, challenging time for the forces of Blue America.   

Roughly a month before his passing, as his health continued to worsen, Kevin himself had included this note to his readers in this brief Health Update:

"Take care of Donald Trump for me."

So said the late Kevin Drum. 

In Tuesday's elections, it may seem that the electorate did take care of the sitting president. But large political gains can quickly turn into political backslides. How do we find a way to move (successfully) forward? 

If only briefly, Kevin resumed normal posting after the update to which we've just linked. As we continue to think about his work, here's the start of an overview he offered on February 15, 2025—four weeks into the sitting president's second term:

Madness

Before Trump was elected, I figured there were a a range of possibilities if he won.

1) On one end: he's a blowhard. He says lots of stuff he never follows up on.

2) On the other end: He's dead serious this time. He's going to deport millions; put tariffs on everyone; take a sledgehammer to DEI; and nominate lunatics to his cabinet. It would be a bloodbath, but the courts and Republicans in the Senate would rein in the worst of it.

But it's been so much worse—though not on stuff he ran on. Deportations have been low and he's backed off on a bunch of tariffs. But DEI has turned into a jihad against anything that so much as mentions Black accomplishment—or women or Hispanics or anything else. USAID has been demolished for no reason and the medical research community is being torn to pieces. The entire federal workforce is being given a haircut with a blowtorch, with no apparent rhyme or reason. Elon Musk is tearing through federal agencies doing God knows what—he won't tell anyone...

Kevin continued from there at some length. As you can see from part of that excerpt—"Deportations have been low and he's backed off on a bunch of tariffs"—much of the "madness" in question hadn't started at that time.

"Madness" is a colloquial term. As readers of this site will know, we think the recent state of American politics does involve issues of (literal) "mental illness."  (Also, we regard a diagnosable "mental illness" as an actual illness—often, as an illness with a physiological basis.)

Tragically but dangerously, we assume that the recent state of our politics involves issues of "mental illness." Once again, the New York Times has taken a total pass on that obvious possibility:

It did so in last Sunday's front-page pseudo-report about the recent weird behaviors of the sitting president. To peruse that report, just click here.

Sad! The "front-page report" was, in fact, on the front page of that day's print editions. But most people read the Times online, and in the kind of braindead behavior in which this paper often engages, the very existence of that lengthy report went unrecorded in the site which the Times headlines as "Today's Paper." 

(We know—you think we have to be joking. But go ahead—click this.)

Sad! For readers who work from the "Today's Paper" site, that relatively toothless report didn't even exist! Persistent haplessness of this type has impeded American attempts at self-government during the (more than) 28 years in which we've maintained this site.

(Then too, there's what the later Wittgenstein alleged about the persistent haplessness of the heralded work performed by the western world's most heralded alleged thinkers! We began to wonder about that possible version of systemic error during our first year out of Aragon High. To see what Professor Horwich wrote for the Times, you can click right here.)

How can we, the American people, build a better, stronger polity? 

The sitting president remains in office. He's now decided to elevate Stephen Miller. How might we the people of Blue America build better outreach to our millions of neighbors and friends? 

How can we build that more durable outreach? The late Kevin Drum left this life at the age of 66. He'd typed and typed and typed and typed. That question remains unanswered today.   

We've been thinking of Kevin this week. We assume that he would have loved what happened on Tuesday night. We assume that he would have liked the messaging which had emerged from a lot of emerging talent. 

The leading authority offers its bio of Kevin right here. The authority starts by saying this:   

"Kevin Drum (October 19, 1958 – March 7, 2025) was an American journalist."

 

117 comments:


  1. With all due respect, he was, though, a retarded Dumbocrat.

    With a weird obsession with lead. And, apparently, judging by your post, with Donald Trump too.

    ...although that is not exactly surprising: every retarded Dumbocrat got infected with TDS, almost exactly 10 years ago. And it's been progressing (that is: getting worse) from there...

    Oh well. RIP, Kevin Drum.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I may not agree with the poo you fling, but I'll defend to my death your right to fling it.

      Delete
    2. Fuck that shit. He's a whiny little bitch that was crushed on Tuesday. A thoughtless loser.

      Delete
    3. There was no need to drag Kevin Drum into Somerby's weird rambling today.

      Delete
    4. Somerby seems to be using Drum as a sort of safety blanket, which is odd and disrespectful, a reaction to badly getting electoral politics wrong.

      Drum was a self described centrist, he generally only supported corporatist neoliberal Dems. Drum also gave the impression he was at the vanguard of recognizing the connection between lead and crime, but in reality all he did was repeat what he learned from old news articles that covered scientists exploring the connection. Drum did overstate the case, though, in a meta analysis only up to 15% of crime could be correlated with lead, and any causal connection remains to be established.

      TDS refers to total dissolved solids.

      Delete
  2. I cherish the memory of Kevin Drum.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He made the connection between lead and crime widely known. Because of him, everyone who wants to understand that now knows about it.

      Delete
    2. The brain is an organ. Of course mental illness can have a physiological cause. Of course a poison like lead can interfere with its development and affect later behavior.

      Delete
    3. Yeah. He made this particular sort of quackery widely known.

      Delete
    4. Quackery? What are you talking about?

      Delete
    5. Some asshole magat who likes shitting on everything.

      Delete
    6. My dad was a scientist who told me that one theory for the end of the Roman empire was the lead in the aqueducts. He then told me there was lead in pipe solder, so always let the water run 30 seconds to get the lead out. Think they got the lead out of solder in the 80's, damn gub'ment regs don'cha know. He also mentioned the end of the Trump cult is here. Except they are so dumb and mean hearted they don't realize it yet.

      Delete
  3. Drum documented his serious illness in his blog. The final few posts were heart wrenching, but he faced his condition bravely and honestly. He was a favorite blogger, and found out about him through TDH.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "But large political gains can quickly turn into political backslides. "

    Yes, just like the stock market goes up temporarily and then goes down again. Or weather gets hot in summer and then gets colder in winter. Somerby's expectation that political swings should not exist but should always be just gain after gain, or it doesn't count, is ridiculous.

    Calling it a "backslide" (generally considered a bad thing) when a peak subsides misunderstands how politics work. The people who contributed to last week's peak for Democrats will now wait and see what the Democrats are able to do with our victory. They expect results. In any case, with Democratic control of both houses, Trump will be reined in and things will change for the better. At the very least, Trump will deteriorate further and be less involved in wrecking our nation's prior accomplishments. So things will appear better. That may lead to less urgency for voters, especially with the upcoming presidential election giving the possibility of electing a Democratic president, and there will be less of a peak. Does that mean Democrats are already failing, as Somerby hints? Of course not. It means we can return to normal, and that is not a bad thing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First order of business is kicking Kushner’s corrupt ass back to where he came from

      Delete
    2. Miller is much more dangerous to us all than Kushner, but there is no reason we cannot deal with both of them.

      Delete
    3. Yeah but we can’t do anything about miller until we deal with Todd.

      Delete
    4. If Trump's henchmen interpret his weakening health as license to advance their agenda full blast, they will be checked by the will of the people, as was clearly expressed last Tuesday. That is the takeaway message of the election -- no one wants what Trump was doing, and Miller's actions will not only ensure the election of a Democrat in 2028 but may result in the kind of demonstrations taking place in Europe, or worse.

      Delete
    5. Americans expect Dems to go hard after Republican corruption and crimes and pass progressive policies like M4A, Schumer and Jeffries are not up to the task.

      Delete
  5. It annoys me that Somerby is indulging his nostalgia today at Kevin Drum's expense. Somerby didn't own Drum. Drum was always a sharp contrast to Somerby's own failures, as a blogger and as a pundit. Drum had an actual career as a journalist. Somerby has always been the dilettante. Drum always saw Trump and his dangers much more clearly than Somerby.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for this remembrance of Kevin Drum. I have missed his curiosity and balance very much myself.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Both Horwich and Dunn have nothing to do with today's events. Somerby's bizarre stream-of-consciousness meandering fails to link them in any way.

    Steven Miller won the political in-fighting in the oval office now that Trump's attention and strength are waning. Miller has already inflicted great pain on marginal people and now will progress to completing the transformation of our country into an authoritarian police state, unless he can be stopped. Somerby might have written today's essay entirely about the dangers posed by Miller's replacement of Susie Wiles (who checked Trump's worst impulses).

    This fight against Trump's forces of evil is just beginning. The American people voted strongly for Democrats as an expression of their rejection of DHS, ICE, corruption, militarization and war, and the transformation of our government into a wholly owned subsidiary of tech bros and billionaires. The people expect Democrats to do something to oppose what Miller will attempt.

    Crickets from Somerby. If anyone is mentally ill in this scenario, it is Somerby himself.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It is bizarre that Somerby reprises an article from 2013 concerning Wittgenstein. Philosophy didn't stop with Wittgenstein. There have been numerous philosophers who addressed the problems with language that he identified, some right there at Harvard when Somerby was a student.

    It is also obvious that Somerby's return to discussing Wittgenstein relies heavily on Horwich and includes no ideas of his own. Why does Somerby do this? Is he grasping at big ideas the way Cecelia uses big words, without knowing their definitions? Just to sound erudite? It doesn't work on the internet because the wide variety of inhabitants of cyberspace ensure there will always be someone who can detect such fraud in a poser.

    I used to think that Somerby included this padding to increase his word count for a puppet-master who expected a column every day advancing right wing talking points. Despite the remembrance of Kevin Drum (who was not the first or the last blogger to pass away), Somerby gets his licks in against Democrats by suggesting that we blues are about to let our victory (less than a week old) slip away with "backsliding" (whatever he means by that). Even by winning, we are apparently doing it all wrong, Somerby hints. Kevin Drum was a moderate, but he never attacked the Democrats the way Somerby does every day.

    When Drum said "Take care of Donald Trump for me" he didn't mean nurture and protect Trump, the way one would take care of a child. He meant give Trump his just desserts, as is now about to finally happen. He meant take care of Trump the way a gangster would say it (obviously Drum was no gangster but neither was he a Trump lover). He meant deal with Trump and his crimes. Somerby seems to have misinterpreted those last words.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "When Drum said "Take care of Donald Trump for me" he didn't mean nurture and protect Trump, the way one would take care of a child...Somerby seems to have misinterpreted those last words."

      In your Somerby-hating brain, sure, that statement makes sense. But in the real world, Somerby wrote immediately after the "take care of" quote:

      "In Tuesday's elections, it may seem that the electorate did take care of the sitting president."

      See? Nothing about nuturing or caring. A simple statement that 'to take care of' Trump was to resoundingly defeat him at the polls.

      Why do you twist things up so much? Can't you read?

      Delete
    2. As Trump himself noted, he was not on the ballot on Tuesday. How then did the electorate "take care of" him? Congress may go on to limit Trump's power, but that hasn't happened yet.

      As to nurturing, what do you suppose it means when Somerby once again points out how mentally ill Trump is? Somerby keeps demanding that we pity Trump, not remove him, not prevent him from doing crazy things in office. He says Trump is ill, physically ill (he emphasizes today). What happens with ill people? Others care for them, nurse them, help to ease their pain. If you don't see that, you are not reading Somerby carefully enough.

      Your assertion that Trump was defeated at the polls makes no sense given that he was not running, not on the ballot. Did Trump's pseudo-campaigning confuse you? That is how Trump's minions keep him busy and out of their hair while they loot the nation.

      I suggest you go back and read Somerby's essay again, this time without your presumptions.

      And yes, I do dislike Somerby. I think what he says is helping the right and hurting our country. I do not hate him because I don't know him personally. I also do not respect, much less admire him. He wasted a Harvard education, taught inner city kids without preparing himself to do so (cheating them of a better education), became a stand-up comedian and ran a comedy club, then retired on the inheritance from his mother (who he disliked). Now he is using his final years to advance right wing talking points while pretending to be liberal (dishonestly). What's to like about any of that? His racism and sexism and xenophobia are ugly to read and harm others by spreading hate in our society.

      Yes, I can read. Can you, without superimposing your own biases onto what someone else has said?

      Delete
    3. Cecelia is more beautiful than you.

      Delete
    4. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

      Delete
    5. "Your assertion that Trump was defeated at the polls makes no sense given that he was not running, not on the ballot."

      Grow up. Everyone--iterally everyone except you--sees the midterms as a major defeat for Trump.

      "Did Trump's pseudo-campaigning confuse you?"

      Trump campaigned. No idea what you mean by pseudocampaign.

      "Congress may go on to limit Trump's power, but that hasn't happened yet."

      But it has Sparky, it has. Trump now has zero chance of getting legislation through Congress without buyoff from the Dems. And he will be investigated from here to eternity. These are limits to his power.

      Delete
    6. The new members of congress have not yet been sworn in.

      Delete
    7. Pseudo-campaign:

      1. There were very small audiences present and many left before the end of his speech.
      2. The venues were kept small so it wouldn't be so obvious no one was attending. High school gyms.
      3. Many Republican candidates were unwilling to appear with him.
      4. He made few references to hype any candidates but gave his usual self-referencing speech, except less coherently and with more glitches.
      5. He did not discuss any local issues or public concerns, such as affordability, but dismissed the topics of interest to voters.

      He appeared to be going through the motions, not actively trying to get any specific candidate elected, enjoying the spotlight but lacking previous energy.

      There is no evidence Trump's campaign efforts actually helped any candidates. That makes the events a Potemkin campaign, to use Somerby's favorite word.

      Delete
    8. The Democrats now have an opportunity to defeat Trump but they haven't done it yet. It depends on what Congress does. Stephen Miller may renew ICE persecution of immigrants. Trump may renew the Iran bombing. Nothing that happened on Tuesday affects that. Trump is just as crazy and contemptuous of the courts as ever. The election doesn't change that either.

      I would like to see Trump defeated, but a vote alone doesn't do it. There must now be action by those elected.

      Delete
    9. Then sigh not so, but let them go / And be you blithe and bonny / Converting all your sounds of woe / Into hey Nonny, Nonny"

      Delete
    10. While Somerby fretted about the precise diagnosis of Trump's mental impairments, Americans were concerned about Trump's corruption and criminality and incompetence, so they ushered in a blue tsunami, much to Somerby's chagrin.

      Delete
    11. "Pseudo-campaign"

      Okay, so you don't like the way Trump campaigns. But notice how far you've wandered from the original point on which I nailed you: that Somerby had misinterpreted the statement by Kevin Drum. That point is uncontradicted.

      Delete
    12. I don’t see that snywhere.

      Delete
  9. Tiedrich talks about the aftermath too:

    "On Friday, some fucking idiot announced that Susie Wiles had been sent to a big farm upstate where she’ll have lots of room to run around, and that undead White House advisor Nosferatu McGoebbels had been promoted to Chief of Staff, because fuck you, that’s why.

    That’ll teach you not to laugh at the fucking idiot, and call him a loser.

    The fucking idiot had one public appearance on his official schedule for Friday: a speech at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida.

    Before the thing started, was the fucking idiot presented with some fake gold-plated award that was invented just for the occasion? Of course he was.

    Did the fucking idiot simply shit out his standard campaign speech, even though the election is over? Yup.

    Did the fucking idiot repeat his latest whiny, needy talking point? Absofrigginlutely.

    [Trump said that he wasn't on the ballot, but if he had been the Republicans would have won.]

    Did the fucking idiot mangle common words that any average four-grader could have aced? You know he did.

    [Trump said "we chartered the human ginome"]

    Overall, was the the fucking idiot a sweaty, incoherent mess who told long, pointless stories with no clear beginning, middle or end? Come on, do you even have to ask?

    [Trump described asking Jared "How bad is that sonic boom or whatever you call it?" He goes "Not good." I say, "So why don't we just open it up? Let's open it up. They've got lots of ways of controlling that sound. We've terminated that ban."]

    By the way, after the speech, the press did actually try to get an answer from the fucking idiot about why his administration was apparently going full fascist ahead, sending threatening letters to conservative groups about monitoring their media appearances. The fucking idiot pretended to know nothing about it.

    But even though the fucking idiot was right there in front of them, not one reporter stood up to ask, ‘what the fuck is wrong with you?’"

    https://www.jefftiedrich.com/p/this-week-in-stupid-november-7-edition

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kinda harsh on the fucking idiot, but he has it coming.

      Delete
    2. Yes, noted rocket scientist Jared.

      Trump: you tell me something is not good, I will make sure to double down and allow it.

      To be fair to Trump, some say DNA is controlled by tiny gnomes.

      Delete
    3. DNA is controlled by quantum mechanics.

      Delete
    4. DNA is a tool of white supremacy.

      Delete
    5. And so is quantum mechanics.

      Delete
    6. They’re tools of misogyny, too.

      Delete
  10. Somerby's ongoing use of the term "self government" is a bit odd in this context. First, here is the definition:

    "Self-government is a system or principle where a group, community, or nation is ruled and directed by its own members rather than by an outside authority. At an individual level, it also refers to self-control and personal discipline over one's own actions."

    In our nation, the terms government and self-government are synonymous because our government is a system of self-government. Even if Republicans are the majority, our system is still one of self government, and no less so when the majority of voters select Democrats instead of Republicans. So what on earth does Somerby mean by using this term?

    Political Self Government is defined as follows: "A state, territory, or indigenous group exercises rule, creates its own laws, and manages its internal affairs independently of external or colonial powers (such as home rule or national sovereignty)." In our case, we have no external or colonial power exerting influence over our internal affairs, unless you count Putin's alleged influence over Trump. But Somerby does not go on to discuss that possibility and, as near as I can remember, never speculated about Russia's control over Trump and the Republicans, even though there is some evidence of Russian attempts to exert influence. I doubt this is what Somerby means today (and yesterday).

    So why use that term? Is he perhaps considering Trump to be the external influence and the recent election an attempt to oppose Trump's control? That too fits the views of some on the left, but doesn't fit anything Somerby has said about Trump at any point. It would not be fair to characterize Trump that way, given that he won in 2016 and 2024. Yes, he cheated, but his elections were considered legitimate.

    It is unlikely that Somerby means nothing and that this is a random use of the term. He could have said "Democracy" because that is what happened last Tuesday. Our democratic system elected a new set of leaders for office, especially those comprising the House and Senate. The results show the will of the people, not just the outcome of a system of self-governance. Democracy is one specific type of self-governance, the one we use and the one written into our Constitution. Not just any self-governance, but one in which all citizens vote for leaders who will enact our wishes.

    So, given that he might have referred to our democracy instead of generic self-governance (which could involve a different approach, even a dictator or authoritarian form of government), perhaps this is another knock on democracy and the fitness of our voters (red and blue) to participate in our longstanding free elections at all levels of government. Somerby has said many times before that he doesn't consider our people fit for democracy, that our democracy is crumbling because we are just not up to the task of making wise choices.

    This election should convince Somerby that he has been wrong about his doomsaying over the fitness of people to elect our leaders. Trump is a bad choice and so were the Republicans supporting him and doing his dirty work. Those people were rejected for election and reelection all over our nation, in all levels of government. That should warm Somerby heart, but I think he is still trying to undermine the principles of democracy we revere, through subtle attacks on our freedoms embodied in our Constitution. Why? Ask the neo Nazi bros who follow Curtis Yarvin and Robert Spencer. Re-read The Iliad a few dozen times. Or just wait -- Somerby will tell us again why we are unfit to govern ourselves and need a Dear Leader, even if it is not Trump but someone like Stephen Miller.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree, Somerby for some time has been expressing cynicism towards the concept of democracy, which is a common right wing stance these days.

      Delete
    2. What would have happened last Tuesday is we had backed on out of it all, as Somerby suggested (while quoting Robt Frost)?

      Delete
    3. "Somerby will tell us again why we are unfit to govern ourselves and need a Dear Leader"

      Somerby believes that in the current state of affairs, we aren't thinking and acting in a way conducive to a healthy democracy.

      But he's never suggested we "need a Dear Leader." That's just your bullshit.

      Delete
    4. Trump is our Dear Leader. By never calling for his removal, opposing his impeachment, denigrating Democratic candidates, Somerby does promote Trump as Dear Leader. Somerby has previously said that we need gatekeepers to prevent the media from showing people the wrong stuff. He has complained that we blues are bad gatekeepers, that the press is not doing its job properly. None of that is my bullshit, but it IS Somerby's anti-democratic ongoing messaging here.

      Somerby has explicitly said that we humans are not up to the job of participating in a democracy. That is not the same as saying we aren't thinking well. When someone complains that the will of the people is not acceptable, they are directly contesting the very idea of democracy, saying that democracy itself is not an acceptable form of government. It is anti-democratic.

      What do you think happens when someone declares a democracy insufficient because "we aren't thinking and acting in a way conducive to a healthy democracy"? Freedoms are then abridged. Free thought is abridged. People are limited in what they can read, write, say to others, what we can read, who we can listen to and associate with, and then we are given leaders who dictate how we must behave to be healthier and participate better. That is not how democracy is meant to work.

      Delete
    5. "By never calling for his removal, opposing his impeachment, denigrating Democratic candidates, Somerby does promote Trump as Dear Leader."

      Read that again and then confess your stupidity to the world.

      Delete
    6. Somerby is an asshole.

      Delete
  11. Obviously now, Somerby's views on Wittgenstein don't come from his own reading but from this article by Horwich (dated 2013).

    People with intellectual leanings keep reading after they leave college. They don't borrow the opinions of others whole cloth and promote them as their own musing, as Somerby does with Horwich today (and previously). They apply those ideas to the world they live in, and keep up with new developments. Somerby does none of that.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "MAGA influencer Laura Loomer is now being accused of being paid between $3,000 and $5,000 for political tweets by multiple people following an ex-advisor to President Donald Trump putting her on blast.

    The Washington Post reported that three people spoke on the condition on anonymity and said they had direct knowledge of Loomer being paid for social media posts. Two said they had paid Loomer directly and the third said they had “overseen” clients who had paid the close ally to Trump.

    Loomer has denied that she is paid for tweets, explaining that she is paid for consulting work through her Florida-registered media company.

    The new accusations follow Alex Bruesewitz, an advisor to Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, publicly accusing her in an online feud of taking money for posts..." [Mediaite]

    There has been a lot of money floating around on the right during the campaign and just in general, to promote right wing views and advance various interests. It would not be surprising if some of it reached Somerby, although I doubt he would command the same rates as someone like Loomer. People who think this kind of thing isn't happening are being naive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't go rousing the Idiot formerly known as Cecelia or she be going off on the "globalists" again.

      Delete
    2. Anonymouse 2:49pm, they’re soon to be at a neighborhood near you, baby.

      Delete
    3. Would it be wrong to pay for tweets?

      Delete
    4. Cecelia, you are more beautiful than the fake feminist anonymouse.

      Delete
    5. Cecelia is a man pretending to be a woman.

      Delete
    6. The fake feminist anonymouse is a chimpanzee pretending to be a human.

      Delete
    7. I am not a chimpanzee yet, but I will eventually evolve to be one. And I sniff my finger.

      Somerby is an ass.

      I am Corby.

      Delete
    8. There is a lot of money available for right wingers from Israeli and Russian sources.

      And Musk in the midterms spent more than Soros has in his entire life.

      Whether someone is a Russian stooge, an Israeli henchman, or a Musk monkey, they are all right wing grifter trolls.

      Delete
    9. I am a troll, but I am not a grifter.

      Delete
    10. I am a grifter troll, but a left wing one.

      Delete
    11. They ever get a conviction on those five US influencer schmucks getting paid by Putin's RT to spread misinformation to the rubes like racist bigot Cecelia?

      Delete
    12. Conviction of what? Spreading ideas that you and I don’t like isn’t a crime.

      Delete
    13. Try again, Boris

      Delete
    14. Dumb comment. 5:56 is correct.

      Delete
    15. "It would not be surprising if some of it rright-wing money) reached Somerby"

      You wouldn't be surprised if a right-winger was paying Bob to go after Gutfeld and the rest of Fox News and endlessly repeat that Trump is mentally ill?

      Delete
    16. He repeats Gutfeld verbatim. That advances him, not “goes after” him. Somerby says pity Trump, not prosecute him.

      Delete
    17. "In 2024 the U.S. charged two Russian media executives in a US$10 million scheme to illegally fund Tenet Media and influence it to promote Russian propaganda.[10] The company shut down shortly afterward.
      According to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), many of Tenet's videos "contain commentary on events and issues in the U.S., such as immigration, inflation, and other topics related to domestic and foreign policy. While the views expressed in the videos are not uniform, most are directed to the publicly stated goals of the Government of Russia and RT — to amplify domestic divisions in the United States."[11]

      Tenet's podcasts featured prominent Republican figures, including Republican National Committee co-chair Lara Trump, Project 2025 director Paul Dans, Vivek Ramaswamy, Kash Patel and Kari Lake.[12] Tenet's content included coverage of illegal immigration, diversity in video games, supposed racism against white people, free speech and Elon Musk,[13] as well as climate change denial content.[14]

      Around February 2023, Tenet sought to hire two right-wing commentators with 2.4 million YouTube subscribers and 1.3 million YouTube subscribers to produce videos. The two eventually signed on, and "Commentator-1" and "Commentator-2" each received over $400,000 per month for producing political videos for Tenet.[7] According to the DOJ indictment, the two defendants requested that Tenet influencers produce content blaming the Crocus City Hall attack on Ukraine and the U.S.

      Delete
    18. "He repeats Gutfeld verbatim. That advances him, not “goes after” him."

      Ah. People are robots that obey what is put in front of them.

      And yet the midterm results contradict that since, many more Republican messages were put in front of voters than Democratic ones. How does that undeniable fact fit your theory?

      Delete
    19. No one is saying people are robots except you. But widening Gutfeld's audience and exposure beyond Fox helps Gutfeld, it doesn't hurt him, much less constitute an attack on him. Somerby's mild complaints about Gutfeld are never accompanied by fact-checks or rebuttals of Fox disinformation. That makes Somerby's so-called attacks superficial and ineffective while promoting Gutfeld to non-Fox viewers.

      Delete
    20. In an election, part of the campaigning is to attract new voters and part of it is to sustain the enthusiasm of existing supporters of a candidate. Gutfeld's goal is to attract viewers so that sponsors will have exposure to their products and generate sales. That occurs whether people agree with Gutfeld or not, vote for Republicans or not. Some shows are nothing but vehicles for advertising, including many Youtube and internet messages. It may be that Somerby is apolitical but is paid to promote viewers on Gutfeld's show, not by political organizations but to sell whatever advertisers are promoting on his show.

      Delete
    21. Somerby attacked the mainstream press for not reporting on and calling out Gutfeld, particularly his misogyny. It seems the voters repudiated him and almost every other Republican despite that. I think voters got the message. No liberal was ever unaware of the misogyny pervading the Republican Party. It was pretty much out in the open. Gutfeld was just a minor puzzle piece.

      Delete
    22. Only thing I learned from R ads this midterm was trannies are running rampant. It's vewy scardied. So I was afraid to go out and vote like Trump was on the ballot in case one of them was in the voting booth.

      Delete
    23. "Somerby's mild complaints about Gutfeld are never accompanied by fact-checks"

      Somerby's complaints about Gutfeld are anything but mild and how exactly do you propose Somerby 'fact-check' a proposition such as Nancy Pelosi's handlers forgot to properly fasten her face?

      Gutfeld deals in insult, not factual assertions.

      Delete
    24. Sometimes lies, sometimes not.

      Delete
    25. To fact-check a dig at Nancy Pelosi you state her age and remind readers of her accomplishments so she is not reduced to a sex object.

      Delete
  13. Somerby has been warning us for years that if blues follow the strategy that they did in the 2026 midterms, they would struggle to win elections.

    Those that are openly Republican offer a similar warning.

    Well, whaddaya know!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your predicate is incorrect.

      Delete
    2. No, as a factual matter.

      Delete
    3. Somerby has been chiding us blues by telling us we are wrong to attack Republicans, to mock Others, to make fun of Trump himself, because that drives people to be red voters. That is the antecedent. Ossoff did that in his campaign and look what happened -- he won bigly.

      Delete
    4. In the clips I saw of Ossoff he didn't mock Trump so much as directly and forcefully accuse him of his misdeeds. Two different things.

      Delete
    5. Somerby objected to Ossoff’s remark about Trump wanting to travel with Natalie.

      Delete
  14. Get a free baklava or golden-layered Trump Tower cake on your birthday when you sign up for a free account through Saddam’s Cheesecake Factory Rewards!

    ReplyDelete
  15. “New England won't have any Republican US
    Senators for the first time in history after the midterms.”

    ReplyDelete
  16. Senator Cassidy who was tossed out of his party by King Orange Chickenshit, has surveyed the massacre of his party last Tuesday and decided the country is demanding democrats to destroy social security. lol


    Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) says incoming Democrats should use their new power to fix Social Security: "That's what the times demand."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He said Democrats should put politics aside.

      Delete
    2. You mean the fu king coward who gave us RFK Jr. and making measles great again has some advice for the party he hates?

      Delete
    3. Medical breakthrough for paraplegics: it is possible to grow a new spine when you are about to be an unemployed Republican congressman.

      Delete
    4. It’s possible, but Cassidy hasn’t chosen to try it.

      Delete
    5. I don’t know about a spine transplant but the fucker sure has got huge BALLS

      Delete
    6. Removing the earnings cap solves 2/3rds of the funding shortage, but our billionaire overlords can't pay at the same rate as us little people. It isn't fair don'cha know?

      Delete
    7. Cassidy’s brain is smaller than his balls.

      Delete
  17. "On this instrument (the “PCL-R”), Trump turns out to be quite easy to score: he obtains about the same score as common criminals in general on “Factor 2” – but considerably worse than most convicted felons on “Factor 1,” the con-man etc. part.

    He went on to point out that, while research is somewhat still in its infancy, Trump’s PCL-R score is in a range that has sometimes been associated with qualitative differences in brain structure and function, e.g., evident in MRIs or PET scans during particular cognitive tasks. Among other curiosities, these individuals tend not to process risk like most people. “Irrespective of that” this medical expert on psychopathy concluded, “Trump’s PCL-R scores are empirically correlated with increased level of dangerous behavior of various types, especially if under great perceived threat. The one thing you don’t want to say about a person with elevated psychopathic traits is ‘Oh, I doubt he’d go that far…’”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It would be helpful if you would provide a link to whatever source you got this from.

      Meanwhile, Tiedrich says this morning (Sunday):

      "Senile old shitwit gets his Dana Whites mixed up. Where the fuck is the press?
      Are we all supposed to pretend this is normal?

      You know, I’m so old that I can remember all the way back to six days ago, when The New York Times finally published an article confirming what we all already knew: that Dear Leader is bugfuck nuts. It was a well-researched piece, with numerous examples of Donny barking out incoherent nonsense as his pudding-brain visibly leaked out of his ears.

      I have a question. Whatever happened to that story? It barely made a ripple in the national zeitgeist. No other news outlet picked it up. Even the Times dropped it after one day.

      Shouldn’t a well-documented account of a sitting president whose brain has gone fuckity-bye have made more of a lasting impression? Because let me tell you something: bugfuck nuts doesn’t magically cure itself overnight."

      https://www.jefftiedrich.com/p/senile-old-shitwit-gets-his-dana

      Delete
    2. The PCL-R is meant to be used together with a clinical interview and review of other health records.

      Delete
    3. We should be calling for transparency about Trump's health, including his obvious cognitive decline. Congress can compel an independent evaluation.

      Delete
    4. Trump’s clinical interview should be on live television.

      Delete
    5. Trump has ordered Blanche to arrest and imprison congressional democrats who want to perform oversight. Blanche has not demurred.

      Delete
    6. We have Grand Wizard John Roberts to thank for very explicitly telling the Orange Felon that he can tell the fucking DOJ* to do anything he wants.
      * Trump’s fucking lawyer

      Delete
  18. Orange Felon’s criminal lawyer otherwise known as the fucking Attorney General of These United States is now inappropriately defending the mad king’s criminal corruption as an “American success story” on Sunday morning news shows

    ReplyDelete
  19. Somerby has announced his focus going forward: chide democrats for every perceived misstep and for “backsliding”, whatever that is supposed to mean.

    Note: all of the missteps he identified in the run up to this election turned out not to matter at all.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Somerby has announced his focus going forward: chide democrats for every perceived misstep and for “backsliding”, whatever that is supposed to mean.

    Note: all of the missteps he identified in the run up to this election turned out not to matter at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We'd have won by an even greater margin if we'd followed Somerby's advice.

      Delete
    2. We would have won Florida and Alabama.

      Delete
    3. What advice? How?

      Delete
    4. The loser in Florida refused to debate the winner and the Democratic national committee decided to spend money on other races.

      Delete
    5. Somerby never weighed in on the race in Florida. Pitying Trump was his main suggestion.

      Delete
    6. 3:28: you seem to need to find something to criticize democrats for. They didn’t have unlimited resources. Meanwhile, Texas flipped completely blue (except Cruz, who wasn’t up for reelection), and we’re about to win a senate seat in Mississippi, plus taking control of the senate, which seemed iffy a few months ago.

      Delete
    7. Having lived in the very red part of Florida including Jacksonville, that voted in a female Democrat as mayor a couple years ago (like Miami did), I have no need to find fault with Democrats, as you spin it. The word would be frustration as they could have won this and beaten DeSantis as well with more EFFORT. My mailbox was flooded with Donald bullshit and nearly nothing from Jolly. If you recognize that you do not have the financial resources to mount that kind of effort, do not turn down the opportunity to debate the frontrunner on TV. Especially if you are the white candidate in a state with heavy Fox viewership. What is especially annoying is that both Jolly and the guy who lost to DeSantis had previously been Republicans. So the Republican Party line was that they were party flip floppers. What is the statistical chance that the Democratic party would run two consecutive gubernatorial candidates for office that had previously been Republican? I found something to criticize democrats for , as you put it, the same way a pedestrian would find a Mack truck. You clearly don’t live in this state or you would get it. Congrats to Texas, Florida should have been there as well.

      Delete
    8. 9:22 is correct in my opinion, it was inexcusable for the national party to completely ignore FL. Florida is not just any state, it will be critical in 2028. There is no way for Rs to win the presidency without FL.

      Delete
    9. The again, as I overthink myself, maybe this is a blessing. Donald won alongside proposition 3, which eliminates property taxes in a manner that will be catastrophic for the infrastructure of many communities in Florida. The Republicans who pushed that measure will make his life miserable if prognostications are correct, and turn voters negatively affected against them. Who knows?

      Delete
  21. Trump was only kidding when he said he was going to name Dana White his press secretary.
    Just like when he said he won the 2020 Presidential election.
    Can't you people take a joke?

    ReplyDelete