THURSDAY: Sitting president reverts to form, part 2!

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2026

The problem we're still all facing: David French says that Pete Hegseth should have been impeached this week. 

Beyond that, he says that Hegseth should be impeached next year, after Democrats take control of both Houses of Congress.  He gives detailed reasons for his view—and French, as you know, is smart.   

His reasoning may make technical sense. On the other hand, we give you this latest reversion to form by the sitting president:

Trump Erupts at ‘CORRUPT AND EVIL’ Democrats, Others in Flurry of Early-Morning Truth Social Posts

President Donald Trump was up early on Thursday, unleashing several Truth Social screeds to eviscerate the “CORRUPT AND EVIL” Democrats who have accused his White House of corruption.

Posting to Truth Social just before 6 a.m., Trump called Democrats “the most Corrupt and anti-American groups of political leaders and hacks,” and accused the party of calling his administration corrupt to distract from “TREMENDOUS & UNPRECEDENTED” fraud in blue states.   

And so on from there. 

Below, you see the first of five such posts by the disordered president. In his report for Mediaite, Tom Durante posts the texts of four of the Truth Social posts:  

Truth Details   

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

The Democrat Party, lead by one of the most Corrupt and anti-American groups of political leaders and hacks in the history of our Country, and even the World, is doing everything in their power to get away from MASSIVE BLUE STATE CORRUPTION by saying, over and over again, that the Trump Administration is corrupt. It is a sound bite that they viciously use, over and over again, in order to nullify the TREMENDOUS & UNPRECEDENTED theft that has taken place in our Blue States – Minnesota, California, and others, all over the U.S.A. I, perhaps foolishly because the Fake News refuses to write about it, including in my First Term, don’t even take a Salary, worth Millions of Dollars. I am the only President to have done so! In any event, THE DEMOCRATS ARE CORRUPT AND EVIL, and I am the exact opposite! Fight hard, Republicans, or you won’t have a Country left! President DONALD J. TRUMP    

This man will function as sitting president for more than two more years. How do you think he'll choose to run the Department of Defense if Hegseth is suddenly gone?

On its face, the president's presence in office seems dangerous. It would help if Democrats and denizens of  Blue America understood the various ways our own bad judgment, and  our own dishonesty, helped send him to the Oval Office for each of his two terms.   

Sadly, we Blues helped create this dangerous situation; we aren't always perfectly sharp. And even now, our political and journalistic leaders still refuse to discuss the president's likely medical / mental health situation in a serious way.  

In the meantime, factions are already starting to form among us Blues, as factions are wont to do. Wisely or otherwise, some Dems already seem to be hoping for one, two, many trials.

Will last week's astounding electoral sweep turn into something more lasting? In significant part, Democrats were able to win so many elections, in so many locales, because the sitting president  was making an undisguised fool of himself on a daily basis, every day, for the bulk of the past year.  

That helped Blue candidates flip red states. The sitting president may still be behaving that way by November 2028, but who knows what he may have decided to do before we could manage to get there?

French says Hegseth should be impeached. It's possible that he's right.


AMERICANA: Mississippi, no longer burning!

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2026

Then too, what happened in Florida: Will this unusual election year become a key part of the story? A key part of the evolving, imperfect American story?

A logger in Maine, a preacher in Kansas? An improbable giant-slayer in the former nation known as Texas? A pair of (lady) Democratic doctors flipping states believed to be red?

Will this year become a part of American history? For obvious reasons, Scott Colom's win in Mississippi is generating headlines like these, as seen online today in the New York Times:

Scott Colom, a Democrat, Wins Mississippi Senate Seat in Historic Upset
Mr. Colom, a prosecutor, will be the first Black senator elected from Mississippi since the post-Civil War Reconstruction period.  

Even there, those headlines stress the fact of party offer the fact of race. Atop the front page of today's print editions, the pair of headlines flips the point of emphasis: 

Colom Attains A Major Upset In Mississippi 
Elected As Its First Black Senator Since 1800s 

As indeed he was, at the age of 43. But which is the more newsworthy part of this upset? His party or his "race?"

Candidate Colom came through for the win. A great deal of the pain of American history is centered in Deep South states like the state from which he's emerged.

That said, we were struck last night, watching reaction on cable news shows, by the numbers of young Black Mississippians expressing their ongoing dedication to the state they regard as their home. Colom himself, at the end of his victory speech, made it clear that he was there to serve "every Mississippian—the ones that voted for me, the ones that didn't vote for me, and the ones that didn't vote."   

"Mississippi matters," he said. He didn't sound like someone who saw himself as part of a winning tribe.

There were "firsts" all over the electoral map this year. In fact, there were so many that many such "firsts" have attracted barely a word of notice. We think, for example, David Crowley, governor-elect of Wisconsin, and of Debra Haaland, governor-elect of New Mexico. 

Crowley and Haaland are both firsts, but in the flood of other such firsts, that fact has received little notice. For the record, Governor-elect Crowley will be the first Black governor of his state. Governor-elect Haaland will be the first Native American woman governor of any American state—and so on from there.

There were many firsts this year. That said, is the age of firsts perhaps reaching its end? Will that be a part of this year's story—a part of the evolving American story?

"These are the days of miracle and wonder?"  (Paul Simon, Graceland album.) In a report last week for the New York Times, Jia Lynn Yang starts trying to puzzle it out:

NEWS ANALYSIS
They Made History as ‘Firsts.’ That’s Not What They Ran On.  

The first Muslim senator. The first Black woman to be elected governor of any state. The first openly gay male senator. The first Black governor of Florida. The first elected Hispanic governors in Texas and in California.

The number of “firsts” achieved on Tuesday’s elections was extraordinary. Barriers came crashing down across the country. And yet during the campaigns, the candidates themselves hardly uttered a word about being on the precipice of history. There were no exhortations to vote for a particular person because “representation matters.”

Instead, most of them spoke relentlessly about household finances that had become impossible to manage, an unpopular war and corruption. They did not—and could not—hide their identities. But these facts were not central to their pitches to voters.

This is a major shift in the politics of identity...  

Yang goes on in somewhat jumbled fashion from there, suggesting that we live in a new and different America: Even as the sitting president "has continued insulting entire racial and ethnic groups," Yang says that Democratic candidates "have downplayed identity" in the course of this year's campaigns.   

It seems to us that Yang is hearing something which is actually there. She closes with a possible explanation for what she believes she has heard:    

[I]n a way, the long-awaited demographic turnover finally arrived in American politics this week. The slate of winners broke so many barriers in part because the country itself has become far more diverse. Since opening up to immigrants from around the world in the second half of the 20th century, the country is now generations deep into a whole new demographic reality.

Baby Boomers, who have long dominated the country’s political scene, are about 70 percent white. Millennials are around half. Gen-Z is more ethnically and racially diverse than any generation in American history. People like Mr. El-Sayed (42 years old), Sen. Jon Ossoff in Georgia (39) and James Talarico in Texas (37) have simply grown up in a different country.

The story this week, then, is not only about racial or gender demographics. It’s about the arrival of a new generation. For these Americans, diversity is not a campaign slogan. It’s a simple fact of life.    

In this portrait, America is moving away from "identity." Increasingly, talent is understood to emerge from every part of this sprawling, demographically complex nation, from every identifiable group.  

Increasingly, voters understand this fact. Increasingly, nobody cares about which group a talented candidate hails from.

Inevitably, some firsts are still more noteworthy than others. Colom's first in Mississippi is a difficult first to ignore. Last night, he promised to carry his whole state into its future, not just members of his own political or racial group.

That said, another first should perhaps be hard to ignore—and Yang mentions it in her opening paragraph.  We refer to her citation of "the first Black governor of Florida." 

We wouldn't have voted for him ourselves, but a lot of Republicans did. We think his election helps flesh out an American story we Blues have unwisely ignored.

Tomorrow: What Paul Thurmond said

WEDNESDAY: Hegseth could have been impeached!

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 2026

Did every Democrat want that? Pete Hegseth could have been impeached. That would have led to a Senate trial. 

Is that the way Democrats wanted to start the new political era? To us, that wouldn't necessarily seem like the best possible way to proceed. 

Other people feel very differently, as you can see below.

At any rate, eleven Democrats missed the vote, including Nancy Pelosi. Where was the former Speaker? We link you to Newsweek's report:   

Nancy Pelosi Explains Why She Missed Pete Hegseth Impeachment Vote  

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi missed a key vote on articles of impeachment against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth after leaving Washington, D.C., to attend a veterans event in San Francisco, where she was receiving an award.

The House voted 211-204 on Tuesday to refer eight articles of impeachment introduced by Republican Representative Thomas Massie to the House Judiciary Committee, effectively halting the effort.  

Eleven Democrats, including Pelosi, were recorded as not voting. Eight additional votes against the motion would have been enough to defeat it.   

Pelosi's absence was notable because the former speaker has previously called for Hegseth to leave office, saying in an October 9 social media post that he was "beyond unfit" to lead the military and declaring: "He must go."   

And so on from there. 

Has last week's triumphal Blue American unity come to an instant end? More pungently, is it possible that elements of the Democratic Party didn't want to start the new regime with an impeachment of Hegseth?  

We have no way of knowing the answer to that. But as Mediaite reports, Blue American unity did take a bit of a tumble:

‘Embarrassing!’ Progressives Erupt at Jeffries and 11 Dems Who Blew Off Hegseth Impeachment Vote   

Progressives erupted at House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and the 11 Democrats who failed to show up for Tuesday’s vote on impeaching Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, allowing Republicans to kill the effort despite their narrow House majority.

The House voted 211-204 to send eight articles of impeachment introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) to committee, effectively ending the push to remove Hegseth. Massie was the only Republican to oppose the procedural maneuver.

According to The New York Times, Republican leaders had initially worried they lacked the votes to defeat the measure. Instead, 11 absent Democrats handed them a victory.   

Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA) blasted her absent colleagues in remarks to MeidasTouch’s Pablo Manríquez following the vote.

And so on from there, with other examples of blasting noted. 

"Shameful," Rep. Kamlager-Dove said. Quite a few other people seemed to feel completely sure about their own assessments.

The eleven Dems are being attacked, at least by a certain number of people. So is the future Speaker Jeffries. 

"Embarrassing," at least one person has said. At fault, some Democrats say, is some sort of a traffic delay caused by some sort of alleged police escort.  

To us, it didn't necessarily seem like the best way to go. To others, the matter seemed different. For better or worse, this is how things tend to work.   

Did every Democrat want him impeached? We have no idea!


AMERICANA: Love thy neighbor, the Texan said!

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 202\

But also, Warnock in Georgia: Every county in Texas shifted blue last week. 

Meanwhile, Kansas, home of Democratic (lady) governors, decided to let a Democratic senator escape the borders of the state. 

In those two states, religious messaging was suddenly back in the year's election campaigns—religious messaging from Democratic candidates! Also, God had a plan in Texas, the governor-elect has said:   

“I am a daughter of the Rio Grande Valley, where the people embody the work ethic and values of our great state, where no one would have imagined that one day, a little girl from the RGV would stand before you here as the next governor of the greatest state, Texas. But God had a plan, and the people of Texas had a plan, too.” 

In terms of straight-ahead Americana, that was straight-ahead American speech. When Lauren Jackson sought to explain in the New York Times, she moved it on over to Georgia: 

The Bible Chapter That Helps Explain the New Christian Left

Senator Raphael Warnock, a pastor from Georgia, has called himself a “Matthew 25 Christian” for years. It’s his boilerplate, invoked in response to questions about health care, immigration and even Fidel Castro.

In the New Testament’s book of Matthew, chapter 25, Jesus tells his disciples that if they offer care to the most vulnerable in society, they are also offering devotion to him. “For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me,” Jesus said, according to Matthew’s author. “I was naked and you clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me.”

It’s a famous passage of scripture...

In the recent political context, it starts with Senator Warnock, she says. That takes us over to Georgia, home state to Dr. King, who filled his first book, Stride Toward Freedom, with references to his devotion to "the love ethic of Jesus."    

Democrats have sometimes been a bit stand-offish with respect to these realms. More than once, it could be that Blue American eyes have rolled in the face of such testimony.  

In this way, denizens of Blue America have sometimes looked for ways to encourage political defeat. As she continues, Jackson starts to describe what the heck she's talking about:  

(Continued from above)
It’s a famous passage of scripture. It’s also a favorite reference for the new wave of religious Democrats heading to Washington. James Talarico of Texas, Adam Hamilton of Kansas and Sarah Trone Garriott of Iowa all wove the verses into their campaigns—and won.

If Christian nationalism is a shorthand for the dominant religious politics of the right, Matthew 25 may be the key to understanding the new religious left.   

[...]

Several of the new Christian Democrats regularly cite scripture, and Matthew 25 in particular. Talarico used it to argue “that health care is a human right.” Hamilton applied it to make the case for welcoming immigrants.

And so on from there.

Jackson is citing "the new religious left" which helped the Democratic Party romp to a 12-point win in deep red Texas, along with a 5-point win in a state which hadn't sent a Democrat to the Senate in almost a hundred years. This suggests that there may be electoral power in Matthew 25.

Lauren Jackson's role at the New York Times is a bit hard to define. Officially, she herself is "a deputy editorial director for newsletters and the host of Believing." 

In turn, Believing is "a weekly newsletter about how people live religion and spirituality now." As for Jackson herself, she's a former Rhodes scholar who grew up Mormon in Arkansas, as we Americans sometimes do.   

On its face, Talarico's win in Texas may have been most surprising of all the wins last week. He hardly looks the part of the giant-slayer who could subdue that big, brawling, deep red state.  

In this second report in the New York Times, Ruth Graham starts to explain the power, the force, of the messaging—messaging which comes live and direct from long American experience:   

What Talarico’s Win Reveals About Christianity in Texas

James Talarico, a onetime Sunday school teacher, opened his acceptance speech on Tuesday night with a Bible story.

“I’m reminded of that story from Scripture of a shepherd boy who goes up against a giant,” he told an ebullient crowd in Austin, Texas. In the end, of course, the shepherd boy defeats the well-armed Goliath with only a slingshot.

Mr. Talarico slew his own giant this week, ending decades of Republican control in Texas with a decisive win that carried multiple other Democrats in the state to victory. He did it in part by speaking easily and openly about how his Christian beliefs inform his politics, starting with the biblical command to love God and “love thy neighbor,” as the sign on his lectern read on Tuesday night.

Talarico is only 37, but he plainly knows his brief. By all accounts, he was able to speak to many different people in Texas—people who fit within a complex cultural framework.

"More than a quarter of adult Texans are self-described evangelicals," Ruth Graham notes in her report. But then again, also this:

[T]he state is also home to progressive Protestants like Mr. Talarico, millions of Catholics, and politically active Black congregations, including one in Dallas whose pastor was elected to Congress as a Democrat this week.

Mr. Talarico, an eighth-generation Texan and onetime seminarian, understood all that. His own grandfather, once a Baptist preacher, found himself on the “moderate” side when conservatives took over the Southern Baptist Convention in the 1970s and ’80s, a move masterminded in Texas. Mr. Talarico was raised in a church that has been known locally for its progressive activism for decades.   

In a town hall hosted by CNN in October, a voter from his hometown of Round Rock, Texas, pressed him “Christian to Christian” about provocative past statements like “God is nonbinary.”    

“Do you believe that the Bible is the absolute source of truth and God’s final authoritative word, even when our culture says otherwise?” she asked.

“Yes,” Mr. Talarico answered.   

We ourselves don't understand the cosmos that way. As a matter of fact, we can't say that we understand the cosmos at all! But should it bother us here, on this sprawling campus, if someone can preach the virtue of kindness the way this young candidate did? 

We Americans! Our three Great Awakenings don't get discussed much, but they're stone-cold Americana. Religious belief has worked in various ways over time. With Talarico from Texas joining Warnock from Georgia, is a new morning upon us?

We see a well-known Texan, online in today's Times, offering this overview about such matters. Try to ignore that headline:

You May All Go to Hell, and Tommy Lee Jones Will Go to Texas

[...]

Jones’s sense of humor reveals itself unexpectedly. Asked what he made of the dispute over a border wall in the Big Bend region, where Jones has spent considerable time both filming and living, he offered a characteristically terse, diplomatic response: “I don’t like bigotry, and I love people.”
Diplomatic, or inscrutable? Each reader gets to decide.

At any rate, We Blues! We've sometimes mocked religious people. On the extremely rare occasion, We Blues can almost seem to have tiny small shortcomings too.   

Tomorrow: Frederick Douglass' ride

TUESDAY: Sitting president reverts to form!

 TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2026

Mamdani does Fox News Sunday: Some things never change. Or if they do, they change back.  

After a brief flirtation with reality, the sitting president has reverted to what may be his oldest way. The New York Times reports the reversion to a tired, inane old form:

Trump Veers Back Into Claims of Rigged Election

For years, President Trump has claimed without evidence that any election he lost or even feared losing was rigged. So it was a surprise to many when, on election night after his party was routed in the midterms last week, he said he was “absolutely willing” to accept the results.

That lasted less than a week.

“Does anybody really believe that this ‘Election’ was honest,” Mr. Trump wrote on Monday on social media, renewing his efforts to sow doubt about the outcome in the face of staggering Democratic wins. “How could the Polls be so wrong??? Some early voting ‘dumps’ were so large that it was impossible to win, no matter how many people went to vote. It’s all about the machines, which are far more important than the voter!”

And so on from there.

Sad! At first, he flirted with a blindingly obvious piece of basic reality. But soon, the president reverted, with the Times citing past manifestations of this persistent madness. 

This madness is very old hat.   

A different strain of public behavior—a type of "new morning"—was visible on Fox News Sunday this weekend. In an interview videotaped last Wednesday, Shannon Bream—one of the sane ones—spoke with Mayor Mamdani, quickly resulting in this:

BREAM (11/4/26): So you are a self-described democratic socialist—DSA.  

MAMDANI (chuckling): Here on Fox!

BREAM: We welcome them all! We're glad that you accepted our invitation. We're glad to have you.

MAMDANI: Absolutely.

[...]

BREAM: OK. So, get rid of borders?  

MAMDANI: No   

BREAM: Get rid of SCOTUS.

MAMDANI: No.   

BREAM: Get rid of jails.

MAMDANI: No.   

BREAM: So, do you think DSA is going to kick you out?   

MAMDANI: No.

The interview continued from there. The mayor was batting away official DSA policy planks. The usual miscreants at Fox News had used those peculiar planks, all through this past summer and fall, to try to take down the Dems.

Despite her employer, Bream isn't crazy. In our view, she and Mamdani created an interview session worth pondering. No one got rude / mad / crazy or nuts, with Mamdani explicitly saying that he doesn't support the DSA's less plausible policy stances.

The DSA has some strange, other-worldly policy planks. The mayor just said no.


AMERICANA: Kansas voters keep picking women!

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2026

Willa Cather's Nebraska: The Houston Rodeo lives on in our mind. But from there, we could take you to Kansas.

As Jericho's walls crashed down last week, something highly unusual happened in that well-known American state. On Tuesday night, with Election Day done, the New York Times reported a fact which would be repeated all over cable news:

Democrat Wins a Kansas Senate Seat for the First Time Since 1932

The Rev. Adam Hamilton on Tuesday became the first Democrat to win a Senate seat in Kansas since the Great Depression, according to The Associated Press, stunning Senator Roger Marshall, a one-term Republican.

Mr. Hamilton, a centrist from the Kansas City area who was registered as a Republican until February, rode voters’ frustration with the economy and disenchantment with Mr. Marshall to the upset victory. Mr. Marshall had campaigned with President Trump in the final days of the race and received late financial support from the national Republican Party, but it was not enough.

Mr. Hamilton, in capping his pulpit-to-politics journey, became the first Democrat to win a Senate race in Kansas since 1932.

It was a fact so nice, they stated it twice! And as a matter of fact, it's true:

The last Democratic senator from the state of Kansas was Senator George McGill—in 1932! He was elected in 1930 to replace outgoing Vice President Curtis, then won re-election two years later. 

There had been no Democrat since!

No Dem since 1932! But as the Times report continued, this subtle suggestion appeared:

"There had been subtle signs in recent years that Kansas was shifting to the left, electing a Democratic governor for two terms..."  

That was also true! But regarding that two-term Democratic governor, she was hardly alone, and she was nothing especially new. Here are the winners of the last ten gubernatorial elections in this, the Sunflower State:  

Elected as governor of Kansas:
1990: Joan Finney (D)
1994, 1998: Bill Graves (R)
2002, 2006: Kathleen Sebelius (D)
2010, 2014: Sam Brownback (R)
2018, 2022: Laura Kelly (D)
2026: Cindy Holscher (D)

Governor's Holscher's win is still unofficial, but it seems to be a foregone conclusion. Axios explains here. 

(Governor Sebelius, of course, went on to serve as Secretary of Health and Human Services under President Obama. As for Obama, he's still said to come from Kenya if you watch the "American Garbage" which gets spewed on the pitiful Fox News Channel.)

At any rate, in six of the past ten elections, Kansans have elected a Democrat to serve as governor. And they've sent female Democrats to the State House every single time!  

("These are the days of miracle and wonder," Paul Simon declared on his Graceland album. But how can we make that proclamation be true? How can we access that grace?)

Six of the past ten elections! These have been the judgments of our fellow citizens, the fellow citizens we can also honor as Kansans. They'd been slow to send a Dem to D.C., but they've been sending female Dems to the State House on a regular basis.  Go figure! 

As a manifestation of Americana, we're always eager to steer you toward Willa Cather's My Antonia, in which Cather expresses her admiration for the tenacity of the vibrant and admirable "immigrant girls" who worked to build the state of Nebraska. 

In the part of the book we most admire, her gender-switched narrator says this about that part of this expanding nation at that particular time:  

The older girls, who helped to break up the wild sod, learned so much from life, from poverty, from their mothers and grandmothers; they had all, like Ántonia, been early awakened and made observant by coming at a tender age from an old country to a new.

[...] 

I always knew I should live long enough to see my country girls come into their own, and I have...

They had learned so much from their mothers and grandmothers! That's part of what Cather has her narrator say as he describes "the rich farms where that first crop of stalwart Bohemian and Scandinavian girls are now the mistresses."

Those words from Cather are sacred text here, though in the chapter to which we refer, the narrator is more concerned with the physical beauty and personal vibrancy of the "immigrant girls" in question than with the material success their devotion to duty created. 

That said, American voters chose to move many women into State Houses this year. For us, that story begins with the scrappy messaging of first-time candidate Amy Acton (Ohio), but it quickly moves on to Governors-elect Bottoms in Georgia and Hinojosa in Texas, along with a raft, or perhaps an ark, of others.  

(NBC News: "Record number of female governors elected.")

In this way, the gruesome misogyny of our nation's raft of under-developed bros was widely rejected by voters this year. Governor-elect Hinojosa took us to a distinctive part of this very large nation with this part of her victory speech:  

“I am a daughter of the Rio Grande Valley, where the people embody the work ethic and values of our great state, where no one would have imagined that one day, a little girl from the RGV would stand before you here as the next governor of the greatest state, Texas. But God had a plan, and the people of Texas had a plan, too.”   

Did God have a plan? We can't tell you that. But human talent emerges in the Rio Grande Valley, as it once emerged in Cather's windswept Nebraska. That fact became clear again this year.  

Back in Kansas, Candidate Hamilton became that first Democratic senator in a very long time. As with the remarkable win by the very young Candidate Talarico in Texas, Hamilton's "pulpit-to-politics journey" came from within another American tradition. 

In the report we've just quoted again, the New York Times starts to explain:   

Mr. Hamilton, the founder of the 24,000-member Church of the Resurrection, the largest church in Kansas and the nation’s largest United Methodist congregation, also had particular strengths.   

He presented as a sure-footed centrist with decades of experience working crowds. He proved to be a strong fund-raiser. And before he made a single campaign promise, many in Kansas were familiar with him from TV broadcasts of his church services.

He had been been on TV and he isn't a nut. Kansans have now sent him to Washington. Regarding his starting point, this:

At this site, we don't hold religious views or religious faith, but we're aware of the fact that large numbers of people do. We Dems have often handicapped ourselves with snarky reactions to matters of faith.   

As we explore our nation's highly varied roots, we'll start right there on the morrow. Lauren Jackson will be saying that it's Senator Warnock who started this most recent electoral awakening. 

Wedded to our Americana, we'll mention Dr. King too. 

Tomorrow: Matthew 25 lies at its heart, Lauren Jackson declares