FRIDAY: Sitting president delivers address!

FRIDAY, JULY 17, 2026

Fox & Friends disappears it: We still haven't watched the full speech. Last night was one of the rare occasions when the president's viewers were falling asleep before he did!  

That said:   

It isn't always what a cable news channel might say—it's what the channel leaves unsaid! Over at Mediaite, Tom Durante advances a striking claim about the Fox News Channel:   

Fox & Friends Completely Ignores Trump’s Election SpeechDoesn’t Mention It Once in 3-Hour Show   

As other networks picked apart President Donald Trump’s prime-time address to the nation early Friday morning, Fox News went in a completely different direction.

Fox & Friends produced not one mention of the president’s address from the night before, during which the commander in chief once again attempted to cast doubt on the integrity of American elections—pointing a finger at Venezuela and China.

Instead, the regular lineup of co-hosts Brian Kilmeade, Ainsley Earhardt, and Lawrence Jones discussed the latest campaign of U.S. airstrikes against Iran, the air quality crisis choking much of America, disastrous flooding in Texas, the World Cup, and a “phenomenal” speech—by Marco Rubio.  

Near the end of the three-hour show, the F&F crew turned it over to America’s Newsroom host Dana Perino for a preview of the 9 a.m. show. In it, she also did not mention the speech.   

And so on from there.  

Assuming the accuracy of Durante's claim, that's a very sharp bit of reporting. Despite the massive emphasis the president placed on this event, it seems to have been disappeared by the Fox News Channel!  

Any news org can be defined by the events and topics it chooses to ignore. But this is quite a report from Durante:

What will they say on The Five?

Award-winning national update: Did Perino and company mention the speech on America's Newsroom?  In a sense, but not as such! 

As you can see by clicking here, Chad Pergram offered a two-minute report on Trump's desire to pass the so-called SAVE America Act. No other part of the speech was mentioned. 

Though a bit of videotape was played, Pergram never mentioned the fact that a ballyhooed national address had actually been delivered.

On CNN and MS NOW, the speech has been aggressively fact-checked. Over on the Fox News Channel, it doesn't seem to have happened at all!

NO PEOPLE... Attempted suicide twice, age 12!

FRIDAY, JULY 17, 2026

We advise you to pity the child: "No people are uninteresting?"   

Would that include the 12-year-old child who is described in this passage from a new AP report?

An immediate relative of David Brouillette who spoke on the condition that their name not be used said he was diagnosed with severe bipolar disorder and attention deficit disorder as a child—a diagnosis that Ashley Brouillette confirmed. The immediate relative described him as “extremely mentally ill” and said he attempted suicide twice at age 12 and was hospitalized multiple times.  

The relative said they’ve been estranged for years, after they broke off contact because they feared he would harm them. He did not respond to their outreach this week, the relative added.

For ourselves, we'd advise you to pity the childthe child who was so deeply disturbed when he was 12 years old. 

In this instance, the tragedy grows. This is the start of the AP report, no paywall, headline included:

AP Exclusive: ICE officer in Maine shooting has history of violent behavior, family and records say 

The Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer who shot a Colombian man in Maine this week is an Army veteran who has struggled with serious mental health issues since early childhood and never should have been given a badge and gun to patrol American streets, several of his close relatives told The Associated Press.

David Brouillette has a history of terrifying and violent behavior, according to those relatives. They accuse him of attacking women in his life over the years, and one shared a voicemail with the AP from last winter in which he told her that he thought someone should slit her throat.

Brouillette’s troubling past further challenges how thoroughly the Department of Homeland Security has vetted recruits as it went on a hiring spree to help carry out President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown.   

At least 10 people have died in encounters with immigration agents since Trump launched the crackdown after retaking office, including 25-year-old Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, a Colombian national who was shot and killed by Brouillette on Monday while in his car near his home in the coastal Maine city of Biddeford.   

Regarding the young man who was shot and killed, the New York Times has quoted a neighbor describing him and his wife:   

"They were always so happy and so polite. I’d be watering my flowers in front of the house, and they would stop and say, ‘Very nice flowers.’ And their little girl would wave.”  

They were always so happy. That's what the neighbor has said. 

Once again in A Moveable Feast, Hemingway once said this about his early years in Paris:   

With so many trees in the city, you could see the spring coming each day until a night of warm wind would bring it suddenly in one morning. Sometimes the heavy cold rains would beat it back so that it would seem that it would never come and that you were losing a season out of your life. This was the only truly sad time in Paris because it was unnatural. You expected to be sad in the fall. Part of you died each year when the leaves fell from the trees and their branches were bare against the wind and the cold, wintry light. But you knew there would always be the spring, as you knew the river would flow again after it was frozen. When the cold rains kept on and killed the spring, it was as though a young person had died for no reason.  

That was a recollection from the earliest years, when he said that he and Hadley were "very poor and very happy." 

As we all know, when people are very happy and very young, they should get the chance to continue. Also, when people are 12 years old and are deeply disturbed, they should ideally get capable help.

In this case, it seems that no such assistance ever took hold. The AP report offers accounts of Brouillette's conduct as an adult which are truly horrific, if perhaps somewhat familiar.

These accounts involve abuse of his two wives and his children. The reported behaviors start as shown, but they become even worse:   

Brouillette, 37, told his ex-wife Ashley Brouillette late last year that he had been hired by ICE. She said that because of his long history of psychiatric issues, she thought he was having a mental health episode and she didn’t believe him. She didn’t realize he’d been telling the truth until this week, when videos began circulating online of the moments surrounding the shooting.  

Ashley Brouillette told the AP that she spoke to her ex-husband in a Facebook audio call, and he acknowledged that he had killed Durán Guerrero. Their 18-year-old daughter, Madison Brouillette, also told the AP that her father called her Wednesday and said that he shot and killed Durán Guerrero. 

David and Ashley Brouillette were high school sweethearts who got married in 2007. She said she divorced him in 2009 because he had become physically violent with her, which began after she got pregnant with their daughter.  

According to Ashley Brouillette, he once threw boiling water at her while she was holding their child—an incident her mother Avis Collins also recounted. The abuse continued after she left him, she said.

[...]   

His oldest daughter, Madison Brouillette, said she also witnessed her dad’s volatility.

“I watched my dad struggle a lot with a lot of things,” she told the AP. She said she came home from school once and he told her he had been sitting on a tree stump with a gun to his head.

Madison Brouillette is just 18. The report doesn't say how old she was when that incident occurredand yes, the accounts of violence in the AP report get worse than what we've posted.  

This week, we've worked from a poem by Yevtushenko. "No people are uninteresting," he says as he begins:

People   

No people are uninteresting.
Their fate is like the chronicle of planets
Nothing in them is not particular,
and planet is dissimilar from planet.
And if a [person] lived in obscurity
making his friends in that obscurity
obscurity is not uninteresting...

And so on from there. But who was Yevtushenko talking about? 

No people are uninteresting? Was he talking about someone like David Brouillette? 

We'll postpone that question until tomorrow. Today, we'll end with two points:   

First, journalists will speak explicitly about "mental illness" and "mental health issues" when reporting on incidents like this. They will not discuss the possibility of serious mental health disordersthe possibility of serious mental illnessin the case of major public officials, even if the official in question had to be sent off to "reform school" at the age of 12 because of his own disturbing behavior.   

(We advise you to pity the child.)

Second point:  

A phrase has been going through our heads in the past several days: "The Politics of Meaning." 

The politics of meaning! It suddenly played an unpleasant role in the discourse of the early 1990s, then disappeared from view.  

Do we need a politics of pity, compassion, engagement, forgiveness? A politics in which we all understand that whichever tribe may be our tribe, that tribe is quite often wrong too?   

Tomorrow: Who he (presumably) meant

THURSDAY: Once the witticisms end...

THURSDAY, JULY 16, 2026

...they turn to the evasions: We employ the moment to offer a gripe about the weekly Bruni/Stephens colloquy at the New York Times. 

This week's colloquy starts as shown. Our gripe concerns the rollicking, tongue-in-cheek, humorous back-and-forth style

Trump Is at His Wit’s End

Bret Stephens: Hi, Frank. We seem to be sliding back into war with Iran. Do you see any good outcome? Or, at least, a least-bad outcome?

Frank Bruni: Yeesh, Bret, you really know how to perk up a guy’s day, don’t you?

Bret: Would you rather discuss interest-rate policy?

Frank: In honor of “The Odyssey”—Christopher Nolan’s new movie adaptation opens this weekend—I’m going to describe that as a Scylla-and-Charybdis choice.

Bret: Listen, Penelope, your suitor is waiting for his answer.

Frank: Fine. I’ll abandon my loom long enough to give you a response. No, I don’t see any good outcome, because whatever happens over the next weeks or months can’t erase or rewrite the, um, odyssey that brought us to this wretched juncture. 

Witty opinion scribes, please! 

Do Times readers really need to be humored this way before they'll read an analysis of the claim that the sitting president is somehow "at his wit's end?"

In fairness, no one can blame Bruni for this feature's rollicking style. It came into being during the earlier weekly "Conversations" between Stephens and Gail Collins. The rollicking style was simply held over when Bruni was subbed in.

At any rate, is the president at his wit's end? And what might that whimsical claim even mean? 

Once the early joshing (largely) ends, it sounds like things are substantially worse than that! Stephens soon unloads in this straightforward manner:   

Bret: ...What isn’t solvable is an erratic president who issues threats he withdraws, signs cease-fire agreements he doesn’t appear to have read, claims he’s indifferent to political and economic considerations until he caves to both, and lacks not only a coherent strategic concept but an elementary understanding of what strategy is.   

Oof! Bruni is no less unimpressed with the sitting presidentbut an intriguing refusal lurks in this presentation:  

Frank: ...Never in the past 50 years have we seen anything from an American president like Trump’s determination to undermine voters’ faith in democracy itself, which is fine with him if it’s the only way to hold on to power and get what he wants. It’s a degree of ruthlessness and a magnitude of narcissism that add up to a kind of political sociopathy. I’ve written this before and stand by it: He’ll burn the whole thing down if that’s best for him. He’ll gladly rule over ashes, just as long as he’s the one ruling. 

Bruni is deeply unflattering too. Our comment would go like this:   

"Narcissism" is a clinical term. So is "sociopathy." 

Like Stephens, Bruni's an excellent writer. That said, has it ever occurred to him that this isn't a kind of political sociopathythat it's straight-up clinical sociopathy, a dangerous "personality disorder" the president's niece attributes to him in her best-selling 2020 book?   

These high-end scribes today! They've agreed that they'll never speak directly about any such possibility. 

They've agreed that they'll never speak directly. Promises made, promises wittily kept!


NO PEOPLE: No people are uninteresting?

THURSDAY, JULY 16, 2026

Can this possibly be what he meant? Friend, did Candidate Trump actually win the 2020 election? 

Did President Biden spend four years in the White House only because that 2020 presidential election was "rigged?"  

For the record, Candidate Trump was also President Trump at the time of the election in question. If that election was somehow "rigged," that massive fraud occurred at a time when Complainant Trump was in charge of the federal government.   

Needless to say, that doesn't mean that the election couldn't have been rigged. And as we noted in last Friday's report, many people seem to believe that it actually was.  

"No people are uninteresting?" Here's the overview of the recent survey we linked you to that day:   

Half of Republicans say the 2020 election was rigged   

This week's Economist/YouGov Poll finds sharp divides in public confidence in U.S. elections, with Democrats and Republicans holding vastly different views on the legitimacy of the 2020 election, the credibility of Donald Trump's recent election-rigging claims, and expectations for the fairness of future elections.

28% of Americans—including half (50%) of Republicans and only 9% of Democrats—believe that the 2020 presidential election was "rigged." Republicans who identify as MAGA supporters are about twice as likely as non-MAGA Republicans to think the election was rigged (66% vs. 32%). 

Many respondents told Economist/YouGov that they believe the election was rigged. According to the published internal data, that includes 53% of respondents who said that they voted for Trump.  

A nation wracked by such widespread belief comes close to no longer being a nationmight be thought of as "failed state-adjacent." In the past, we've advanced the comparison to the Oscar-nominated film, The Sixth Sense:   

A nation like that may already have ceased to exist. It just doesn't know it yet.    

Tonight, the sitting president of that nation is apparently going to go on TV and advance some form of that claim all over again. For MS NOW's report on what he's likely going to say, you can just click here.  

President Trump has been insisting that the election was rigged for almost six years now. He's never made any attempt to offer evidence in support of that claim, but he just keeps making the claimand by this time, he seems to have persuaded something like half of all Republicans.

We're prepared to believe that the sitting president may even believe his claim! That's because we assume that his niece is probably right. As we showed you yesterday, here's what she told CNN's Erin Burnett earlier in the year:

BURNETT (2/26/26): You've known him your whole life. Do you actually see a decline?

MARY TRUMP: I do, but I think it's important to remember that Donald has never been fit in any capacity. Obviously, what we're dealing with now are age-related cognitive declines. We're dealing with physical issues that the White House tries to cover over.

But this is somebody who for decades now has had serious, undiagnosed and untreated psychiatric disorders, which are only going to worsen, especially given the pressure he's under and given the cognitive and physical declines.  

"He has never been fit in any capacity," the president's niece told Burnett.

For the record, a serious, untreated "psychiatric disorder" is a serious, untreated "mental illness." And Mary L. Trump, the president's niece, is a doctorate-holding clinical therapist.  

That doesn't mean that her assessment has to be correct. But we'll guess that it most likely is.   

(We also believe that a serious mental illness is in fact a serious illness. We believe that any such serious illness is a human tragedy. Ideally, we believe the current situation should be regarded that way. That would take us well beyond the limited capacity of our mainstream press corps and of our pre-existing American discourse.)

Yesterday, in a high-profile Senate hearing, Jay Clayton couldn't quite bring himself to say that Candidate Biden won the 2020 election. Everyone within the Trump administration understands that such a thing can simply never be said.

Clayton clammed before the Senate panel. Here's another place it will never be said:    

The Five is our failing nation's most-watched "cable news" show. Its daily viewership is roughly three times as large as that of MS NOW's daily shows.

None of the panelists on The Five believe that Candidate Trump won the 2020 election. That said, Jessica Tarlov will never ask the four pro-MAGA co-hosts if they think that election was rigged. 

She will never ask them why President Trump keeps saying that the election was rigged, in the absence of any evidence in support of that claim. The Fox News Channel's very large audience will never be asked to see that question asked.

Very good salaries are slipped into pockets in service to such deceptive behaviors. On MS NOW, very good salaries are slipped into pockets as everyone agrees not to report or discuss what Mary L. Trump once again said and meant.

"No people are uninteresting?" Can any of this possibly be what Yevtushenko meant?   

Tomorrow: What Yevtushenko presumably meant


WEDNESDAY: He had permission to work in this country!

WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 2026

But he didn't have legal status? Tomorrow, we expect to discuss the second person who recently lost his life.   

For today, we return to a bit of a technical question from this morning's report. It's a question about Johan Sebastian Guerrero, 25 years old, "always so happy and so polite," late of Biddeford, Maine.  

The question: 

Did this young man "have legal status?" That's the way the question was framed in the headline of this New York Times report.   

Did this young man "have legal status?" In this newer report in the Washington Post, it starts to look like he did:

Man killed by ICE came to Maine seeking better life for young daughter   

The woman stood in a hallway of her apartment building, pressing her hands up against a window as she took in a scene of unfathomable violence: The white Kia her partner had been driving was angled against a curb, its windshield pierced with bullets.

“Mi amor, mi amor,” she cried. His lifeless body was lying in the street. When she and her 3-year-old daughter went outside, she dropped to her knees and sobbed, witnesses said.

Her partner, 25-year-old Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, a Colombian citizen, was fatally shot by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer Monday morning on the block where the couple lives in this small city in southern Maine, the second deadly shooting by ICE in less than a week.

Durán entered the United States via the southern border in September 2023, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said in a statement, and received work authorization in May 2025. 

According to the DHS, he received authorization to work in this country as of May of last year. Forgive us for being simple-minded, but if the federal government has conferred that status on someone, it's hard to see how the recipient can be said to be in the country illegally.   

That's how it seems to us! But thanks to the phenomenon we've described as "the complexification of everything," there was room in the Post's report for this additional copy:

ICE enforcement and removal officers appeared to be looking for someone else. They were conducting surveillance at the last known address of an undocumented immigrant who was subject to a final deportation order, an agency spokesperson said. 

But Durán was not the person they were looking for, Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) said in several interviews.

[...]

In a statement, a DHS spokesperson said that Durán did not have legal status in the U.S. Durán likely received work authorization while seeking asylum, an immigration lawyer who reviewed the DHS statement said.  

Say what? Speaking directly to the language which appeared in the New York Times headline, a DHS spokesperson is now quoted saying that he didn't "have legal status." The Post then repeats the fact that he did have permission to work!

He'd been given permission to work in this country. (Also, it seems, to seek formal asylum.) But that certainly doesn't mean that he was in southern Maine legally!

Should the Post have tried to straighten this out? Yes, we think they should have. But so it goes in tongue-tied modern cultures driven by an instinct for various forms of mumble-mouthed verbal complexification.   

We humans! Within the modern American context, discussion of almost every major issue is clouded by this instinct. 

A wide array of murky formulations may seem to clash with each other. Attention doesn't get paid. Tribal propagandists may repeat only the formulations which support the political outcomes preferred by their own infernal tribe.   

He had permission to work, but not to be here! As we've noted in the past:

We humans are skilled at building tall buildings, less skilled at everything else.

With apologies, this: "Philosophical problems arise when language goes on holiday." 

This case isn't really the sort of thing the later Wittgenstein was talking about, bit it almost comes somewhat close.

NO PEOPLE...: "They were always so happy and so polite!"

WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 2026

What the neighbor said: "They were always so happy and so polite," their neighbor in Biddeford, Maine has now said.   

They were a husband and wife and a 3-year-old child. The New York Times is reporting the neighbor's recollection in yesterday's news report:

Colombian Immigrant Killed by ICE in Maine Had Legal Status, Father Says

The father of a Colombian immigrant shot and killed by a federal agent in Maine on Monday described him as “a good person raised with strong values,” who worked two jobs to support his wife and 3-year-old daughter.

“He had a great vision for getting ahead, so many dreams to fulfill,” Omar Duran, the father of Joan Sebastian Guerrero, told Noticias Caracol, a Colombian news outlet, on Tuesday, speaking in Spanish. “My son is a wonderful son—I don’t know why they did that to him.”

Mr. Guerrero, 25, lived in Biddeford, a small city south of Portland, where he worked as a food delivery driver and a late-night cleaner at a veterinary clinic. Mr. Duran said his son was in the United States legally.

[...]

“They were always so happy and so polite,” Don Gregoire, 69, a hairstylist, said of Mr. Guerrero and his wife. “I’d be watering my flowers in front of the house, and they would stop and say, ‘Very nice flowers.’ And their little girl would wave.”  

Did the deceased "have legal status?" As far as we know, that still isn't clear. It's also true that many people seem to have learned, in the past eighteen months, that "legal status" under one president may suddenly be something different under the subsequent president.   

“They were always so happy and so polite,” their neighbor has told the Times. Polite may often follow from happy, and it's good to be happy and young. 

Hemingway wrote about happy and young in his beautiful recollection, A Moveable Feast. In its original version, the memoir ends with this:  

A Moveable Feast

[...] 

This is never any ending to Paris and the memory of each person who has lived in it differs from that of any other. We always returned to it no matter who we were or how it was changed or with what difficulties, or ease, it could be reached. Paris was always worth it and you received return for whatever you brought to it. But this is how Paris was in the early days when we were very poor and very happy.   

That's the memoir's final paragraph. Until the sudden astonishing end of the story, he and Hadley were poor and happy, and they were very young.   

No people are uninteresting, Yevtushenko said. We came upon his poem in a book, way back when we ourselves were somewhat younger. When we first read it, we found it deeply moving in a way we still do, though we still can't begin to say why.   

No people are uninteresting! We'll change one word in the translation as we recall the way the poem starts:

People   

No people are uninteresting.
Their fate is like the chronicle of planets
Nothing in them is not particular,
and planet is dissimilar from planet.
And if a [person] lived in obscurity
making his friends in that obscurity
obscurity is not uninteresting.

Or if a person lived "in obscurity" complimenting his neighbor's flowers as he walked down the street with his wife and his 3-year-old child.  

(Many people in southern Maine grow flowers in their shorter, cooler summers. We've seen it with our own eyes.)   

No people are uninteresting! Presumably, Yevtushenko was thinking of the millions lost under Stalin, or of the tens of thousands of men, women and childrennone of them uninterestingmassacred at Babi Yar.   

Presumably, that's who he mainly had in mind. Presumably, though, he was also thinking of this young couple in Maine, and of their 3-year-old child.   

That said:   

Can it possibly be true? In the simplest colloquial sense, can it be true that no people are uninteresting? None of us people at all?

How about the furious fellow whose video rant was recently reposted by the sitting president? As we noted yesterday afternoon, the 49-minute rant started off like this:   

DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM MUST BE CRIMINALIZED; LEADERS DEPORTED  

Right now in America, politically, we are in the late stage of the disease of Communism. The smirking con man from Uganda had the audacity to sit behind George Washington's desk in New York City the other day, basically declaring a revolution on America, surrounded by no Americans, none of them were citizens. 

These were all invaders.  

I'm going to tell you a story today about a little man, just like this smirking bastard in New York City, named Pol Pot...  

And so on from there. For the record, this man chose "Savage" as his pen name. Over the weekend, the sitting president chose to report his 49-minute rant on his own Truth Social site.

At this site, we're willing to wait to see how Mayor Mamdani's tenure turns out. According to the furious Michael Savage, the mayor is a "smirking bastard"a smirking con man from Ugandawho is planning to oversee the slaughter of millions of people, just as Pol Pot did.  

No people are uninteresting? Does Michael Savage count? And how about the high official who chose to repost that rant?  

Regarding the high official in question, we've suggested that it would be effective politics, and more accurate on the merits, to pity him for his "mental disorders." 

We've suggested that a (serious) mental illness is, in fact, an illness. We've also said that we would guess that his niece's assessment is right:   

BURNETT (2/26/26): You've known him your whole life. Do you actually see a decline?

MARY TRUMP: I do, but I think it's important to remember that Donald has never been fit in any capacity. Obviously, what we're dealing with now are age-related cognitive declines. We're dealing with physical issues that the White House tries to cover over.

But this is somebody who for decades now has had serious, undiagnosed and untreated psychiatric disorders, which are only going to worsen, especially given the pressure he's under and given the cognitive and physical declines.   

For the longer exchange with CNN's Erin Burnett, you can just click here.

In the passage posted above, Mary Trump said her uncle is experiencing an obvious cognitive decline, layered atop decades of untreated psychiatric disorders. She went into much more detail in her best-selling 2020 family memoir, Too Much and Never Enough

"No people are uninteresting?" As he blusters and keeps changing his mind, does her uncle count?    

The so-called democratization of mediathe rise in technologies which Jeffrey Rosen has now discussedhas brought many savage voices into the public square. At present, we'd say that most of these voices come from Red America, but those of us in Blue America have our own decidedly mixed track record.   

Is there a way to get out of this messa way "back out of all this now too much for us?" For today, we'll return to what one Maine resident said:   

"They were always so happy and so polite." 

They were always so happy and so polite! So how do we deal with this mess?

Tomorrow: Additional people