LONG ENDURE: Can government "of the people" endure...

THURSDAY, JULY 9, 2026

...when "the people" align in tribes? Of the people? By the people? Can a government like that "long endure?"

Speaking at Gettysburg, President Lincoln understood that some observers around the world weren't especially sure. He closed his brief remarks that day by saying that those present should dedicate themselves to the task of ensuring that government of the people "shall not perish from the earth."   

Today, we're engaged in a great civil wara tribal war marked by vast clowning. For an example of what we mean, consider what happened on CNN last night.

Midway through the 8 o'clock hour, Anderson Cooper spoke with a three member panel concerning Graham Platner's apparent withdrawal from the Maine Senate race.    

Cooper played substantial chunks of Platner's taped statement. He then threw to Gretchen Carlson, a former Fox News Channel host.

We the people should be grateful to Carlson. The leading authority explains:   

Gretchen Carlson   

Gretchen Elizabeth Carlson (born June 21, 1966) is an American broadcast journalist, writer, and television personality.

Carlson was born and raised in Minnesota. A talented youth violinist, Carlson competed in a number of music contests before becoming a beauty pageant contestant. After winning Miss Minnesota in 1988, Carlson became Miss America for 1989. She attended Stanford University and graduated in 1990. 

[...]   

In July 2016, Carlson filed a lawsuit against then Fox News chairman and CEO Roger Ailes, claiming sexual harassment. Subsequently, dozens of other women also stepped forward to accuse Ailes of harassment, and Ailes resigned under pressure. In September 2016 Carlson and 21st Century Fox settled the lawsuit reportedly for $20 million, and Carlson received a public apology. Carlson was one of the first high-publicity cases of 2016's #MeToo movement.

In 2019 she co-founded Lift Our Voices to work towards a ban on non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and forced arbitration clauses in employment agreements. In February 2022, the U.S. Congress passed the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act, a law championed by Carlson which excludes sexual assault and sexual harassment complaints from arbitration clauses, including retroactively. On March 3, 2022, President Joe Biden signed the bill into law. On December 7, 2022, he also signed the Speak Out Act, another bill backed by Carlson. 

And so on, at length, from there. 

In our view, we the people should be grateful to Carlson. That doesn't mean that she has perfect judgment because, of course, nobody does.   

Last evening, Cooper threw to Carlson first. Below, you see what she said:  

COOPER (7/8/26): Gretchen Carlson, Platner still denies the allegations. How do you think his statement is going to be received? What do you What are your thoughts right now?

CARLSON: That [videotaped statement] was a disgusting display of hubris that every woman and man in America should be incredibly upset about. Regular people do not abuse women. It's always somebody else to blame. It's typical cry of assaulters.

His own wife turned in text messages that he was having with other women. He posted on Reddit many years ago that he believed that women should be responsible for when bad things happen to them sexually.

Not to mention the Nazi tattoos and a myriad of other things. He is conflating tonight his candidacy of being popular with being an every kind of person [sic], with accusations of rape. 

Thatthose are two totally different things. And a real man would stand up and take accountability for what has happened here.

This movement has had immense progress over the last ten years and these women are believed. And I don't know what this display was in this video, but I wouldn't want the endorsement of Graham Platner, whoever the Democrat is, running in this race.  

Some of that was hard to follow, but that's what Carlson said. 

Brad Todd, a Republican strategist, was the third panel member to speak. Can the nation expect to long endure? This is what he said: 

TODD: Well, I think, by the way, the race should have gone to this spot a long time ago. I mean, all those things that Gretchen just outlined are exactly true about Graham Platner, and they were true before this weekend.

If you look back at The New York Times on June the 4th, he said that if someone broke in his house, he would rape them to show them he was dominant. So we heard he was physically abusive by a corroborated story from a longtime girlfriend. But Democrats in Washington and in Maine just ignored it.

The Sheldon Whitehouse, the Senator from Rhode Island, said, "Oh, those accusations came from a Republican operator." So he didn't think they were anything to worry about. Graham Platner has been bad all the way from the start. And the only difference was this weekis on this weekend, there were polling numbers came out that showed he might be losing to Susan Collins.

His cardinal sin to get dumped by the Democratic Party is looking like he might lose. And I think that, where this race goes from hereI mean, Maine Democrats are going to pick someone else awful. They're going to pickthey like Graham Platner because he's bad. They'll pick someone else because he's bad.

... I mean, it's really just come down to raw power. Democrats will tolerate anything for raw power in Maine.  

Democrats will tolerate anything, the Republican strategist said. He then made an amazing claim:

Democrats like Platner because he's bad!  Also, they'll pick someone to be his replacement because [that new person] is bad! 

They'll pick the new person because he or she is bad! That seems to be what Todd said. 

Can a government expect to endure in the face of such tribal vehemence? We aren't sure, but there was a blindingly obvious problem with what Todd saidand Democratic Party official Christine Quinn now stepped in to say it:   

COOPER (continuing directly): Christine, what do you think of what Brad said there?

QUINN: You know, first of all, I think on a day where a federal judge ordered President Trump to pay over $5 million to E. Jean Carroll for sexual assault, I just find it rich. 

These Republicans and Republican leaders who are now so concerned about sexual assault and rape, when they have stood by President Trump time and time again when he has been accused of horrible sexual misdeeds.

Maybe this is a moment where everyone will start to come together and hold everyone accountable and say no one is above the law, even if they are president of the United States. But I sincerely doubt that we will see that. I think we will continue to see hypocrisy on the part of the Republicans.   

It's what we mentioned yesterday, speaking about The Five. It's astounding to see people who have swallowed the sitting president's apparent sexual history suddenly expressing shock when Democrats show an inclination to look the other way regarding one of their own.   

Quinn pushed back against the one-way fury of Republican strategist Todd. Yesterday afternoon, on Fox, Jessica Tarlov pushed back against guest host Trace Gallagher in a similar way.   

Gallagher is a reliable (and highly skilled) partisan attack dog. As you can see at this Mediaite report, Tarlov abruptly told him this:

"The Democrats will not be lectured by the party of Donald Trump...about what good behavior is when it comes to how women are treated and questions of abuse. That is a non-starter here."  

Personally, we think the time has come for Tarlov to leave The Fiveto stop agreeing to play the role of designated punching bag on that ludicrous imitation of a "cable news" TV program. 

That said, people like Gallagher have disappeared all manner of misconduct, sexual and otherwise, on the part of the sitting president. Their ability to blow past their double standard in this matter is truly astonishing, and Tarlov pushed back quickly and hard.

For what it's worth, we agree with something Todd said on CNN. We thought Senator Whitehouse was remarkably dismissive about earlier claims against Candidate Platner. 

We were amazed and disappointed by the frivolous tone he adopted, on The Last Word, toward the June 4 New York Times report. We think less of him because of the way he reacted, and we're sorry that we do.

That said, we the people now engaged in a great tribal wara tribal war marked by the astounding true belief performed by many of the most watched stars in this nation's "cable news" industry. That brings us back to Professor Rosen's essay for The Atlantic, which bore this dual headline:  

IDEAS
American Democracy Wasn’t Designed for This
Can our 18th-century institutions survive 21st-century technology?

Even such as it has been, can our democracy expect to survive? Will it long endure?

Our guess:

Not in the face of the fury of Gallagher / Todd and so many others. Also, not in the face of what we'd call Professor Rosen's passivity.

Tomorrow: The constant refusal to speak 


WEDNESDAY: How well are America's schoolkids doing?

WEDNESDAY, JULY 8, 2026

There's no single way to tell: How well are America's children doing? Our 9-year-old students, let's say.  

There's no easy way to answer such a worthwhile question. That said, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) tested a national sample of such kids last year.   

How strong are the skills of These Kids Today? Results may see to differ depending on where you start your comparisons, if you choose to approach things that way.   

For today, we'll go back a good long ways. The Long Term Trend version of the NAEP goes back a bit farther than we will, but this is how last year's numbers look as compared to the numbers from 1980 (reading) and 1982 (math):

Average scores, 9-year-old students  
Reading, Long Term Trend NAEP

1980 / 2025

All students: 215.04 / 218.39
Black kids: 189.35 / 204.62
Hispanic kids: 190.22 / 207.59
White kids: 221.34 / 224.79
Asian kids: 224.56 / 242.48
Average scores, 9-year-old students
Math, Long Term Trend NAEP
 
1982 / 2025

All students: 218.98 / 237.67
Black kids: 194.94 / 220.19
Hispanic kids: 204.00 / 226.24
White kids: 223.95 / 245.82
Asian kids: 241.60 / 260.11

Now for the rest of the story:  

Average scores have risen since those early years, especially in math. For the record, we aren't cherry-picking those starting points. Math and reading were tested in separate years back in those earlier days.   

That said, how large are the academic gains suggested by those numbers? On the Main NAEP, it's often said, as a very rough rule of thumb, that 10-11 points on the NAEP scale is roughly equivalent to one academic year.  

You can start applying that (very rough) rule of thumb to the data shown above. At your favorite major news sites, you'll see no one try to inform you in more detail about the meaning of those statistical gains. In fact, no one cares about any of this, and no one ever has or ever will.   

Based upon last year's numbers, 9-year-old students have come a long way since the 1980 / 1982 testing. The Main NAEP shows similar progress when we go back that many years.  

To review the difference between the two different versions of the NAEP, you can just click here

For access to all data from the Long Term Trend NAEP, you can start by clicking this. From there, you're on your own


LONG ENDURE: Technologies threaten our cool reflection!

WEDNESDAY, JULY 8, 2026

So Rosen wisely says: No one's assessments are unassailable, perfect. But in our view, the inanity never stops at one of our struggling nation's three (3) major "cable news" channels. 

Last night, at 8:06 p.m., that channel's chyron said this:  

EVEN COMMIES WANT PLATNER GONE  

Yes, that's what it said.   

The channel to which we refer was the Fox News Channel. The show was Jesse Watters Primetime, the second most-watched "cable news" show within the American firmament.   

With Watters rumored to be vacationing in the south of France, Charlie Hurt was filling in as the program's host. He came on the air excitedly citing an actual news event:   

WATTERS (7/7/26): Welcome to a special edition of Jesse Watters Primetime. I'm Charlie Hurt, filling in for Jesse. 

We start with a Fox News alert:

Another bombshell scandal just blew up inside the Democrat tent. Graham Platner, who has been accused of outrageous drinking, manhandling women, and sexting outside of his marriage, has just been accused of sexual assault. 

It was an actual news event. Indeed, as Hurt continued, he offered his basic citation:  

[continuing directly
Lyndsey Fifield, at the center of last month's New York Times piece, just spoke to CNN, and she is accusing the Democratic Senate candidate from Maine of being hostile and violent towards women. She is speaking out just 24 hours after the first ex-girl friend spoke to CNN. 

A minor bungle is included in that brief overview. But this was an actual news eventa news event the Fox News Channel was able to discuss thanks to reporting provided by CNN. 

Indeed, all three major cable news channels opened their 8 p.m. program last night with this topic. That said, only one hurried to offer the braindead chyron we mentioned above. Let's ponder that chyron again:   

EVEN COMMIES WANT PLATNER GONE  

Yes, that's what the chyron said. You can't get dumber than these mofos are, but they'll surely continue to try.   

Three hours earlier, at 5 p.m., the nation's most-watched "cable news" show opened with the previous day's news about Platner. That news had also been broken by CNN.

The Five opened with that. One of its stars had returned from the south of France, but Jessica Tarlov was gone: 

The Five: Tuesday, July 7, 2026 
Kennedy: former MTV VJ 
Harold Ford: former congressman (D-Tenn.) 
Brian Kilmeade: co-host, Fox & Friends 
Dana Perino: co-host, The Five
Greg Gutfeld: host, Gutfeld!

We noted a type of irony as the four pro-MAGA players took turns saying the very same things, as they typically do.

On this evening, the four were shocked and appalled by the litany of accusations floating around Platner's head. No one mentioned an awkward fact: 

The president they treat as a successor to the sun god Ra has a gruesome record in this areaa record which matches, or even surpasses, that of Platner. But no such facts will ever be mentioned on this astonishing imitation of corporate propaganda messaging vehicle which poses as a news program. 

The four pounded away at Democrats who had supported Platner in spite of his record. They failed to note that they themselves are still adopting the same stance with respect to the record of sexual conduct surrounding Citizen Trump.

We move to a somewhat strange fact:

In his recent essay for The Atlantic, Jeffrey Rosenhe's very sharpdoesn't mention the Fox News Channel. Also, he doesn't mention MS NOW or CNN, or cable news in general.  

That said, he does mention some new technologies which have created, or so he says, a threat to the continued existence of our American democracy, imperfect though our democracy has always been.   

Rosen says it, and we believe it! Here's the heart of the way his essay starts, dual headline included

IDEAS
American Democracy Wasn’t Designed for This
Can our 18th-century institutions survive 21st-century technology?

In 1787, after the Founders signed the Constitution in Philadelphia, Alexander Hamilton wrote in “Federalist No. 1” that there was more at stake than the future of a single country. The American experiment would “decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force.”

The Founders were hopeful, in part because the information environment of the late 18th century was favorable to “reflection and choice.” A flourishing newspaper industry kept Americans informed and fostered vigorous debate...And at a time when nothing traveled faster than a horse or ship, the sheer size of the new country meant that news spread slowly, an obstacle to impulsive public decisions....

Today, those advantages have disappeared, thanks to a technological revolution the Founders could never have imagined.... As America approaches its 250th anniversary, the biggest question for our democracy is whether a system designed for the communications technologies of the 18th century can survive those of the 21st.  

Are we the peoplewe the humanscapable of making the kinds of judgments needed to maintain a "western democracy?" Are we "really capable of establishing good government" through widespread reasoned "reflection?"  

Are we the American people still capable of such acts? Professor Rosen says he isn't entirely sure. 

Quite correctly in our view, he says that certain new technologies are making that outcome much less certain. As his essay beginsin the deletions we have madehe specifically mentions the Internet and social media, with the onset of AI also mentioned.

Later, he specifically mentions podcastsbut he never mentions talk radio, and he doesn't mention cable news. Possibly stretching the term bit, it might be said those are two additional technologies which have transformed, and are continuing to transform, our "information environment." 

There's never been a time when foolishness didn't exist within the human environment. That said, today's technologies have created a world in which chyrons like the one cited above go out to millions of people, and they go out extremely fast.

EVEN COMMIES WANT PLATNER GONE!

That's what the silly/sad chyron sillily said. As we close for today, we'll borrow a word from the Atlantic headlines posted above:

Can our society expect to "survive" the round-the-clock, daily drubbing administered by the technologies now in play? 

Rosen says the answer may be no. We'll suggest that Rosen is giving voice to an extremely important point.

Tomorrow: One month plus three days


LONG ENDURE: "Our democracy wasn’t designed for this?"

TUESDAY, JULY 7, 2026

Who is Jeffrey Rosen? Inevitably, the initial segment on The Five began with the Communist / Commies rant.

The Fourth of July had come and gone. Yesterday, Dana Perino started the show by playing the relevant clips from the president's rain-drenched address:

PERINO (7/6/26): Hello, everyone. It's 5 o'clock in New York City and this is The Five.

President Trump, bringing the fight against Communism to America's 250th birthday celebrations...

PRESIDENT TRUMP (videotape): We don't want Communists in our country.
PRESIDENT TRUMP (videotape):  Communism is a loser and it always will be. The Communist system is the opposite of the American system and the Communist system has never worked. Our warriors did not fight Communism on battlefields across the world only to have that menace rear its ugly head right back here in America. We're not going to let it happen.   

So said the president on July 4, in a rainy-day address. Now, it fell to the stars of The Five to move the agitprop along. 

This being a summer holiday week, several of the program's top stars are off in the south of France. For that reason, a slightly second-string lineup was messaging the public this day:  

The Five: Monday, July 6, 2026 
Kennedy: former MTV VJ 
Jessica Tarlov: resident punching bag 
Joey Johnny Jones: co-host, The Big Weekend Show 
Dana Perino: co-host, The Five
Tom Shillue: comedian

That was yesterday's lineup. After Perino played videotape of the president's statement, something designed to resemble a discussion ensued. 

Before long, Perino threw to Shillue. Inevitably, he took the cake

SHILLUE (7/6/26): If you look at the Trump speech, he uses the "Communism" thing a lot, but he goes on several levels.  

So he says, "Oh, the Commies are coming. We beat them. We went to war against the Commies, and we would do it again, but we don't have to."   

And then he would say, "Never worked, never will." See, that's the message that young people need to hear...    

It's great the way he— You know, when he gives a speech, you can see the speech, and then you see the boldface [points]...then he has his asides. So he said his bit about Communism, then he said, "It never worked, it never will," and then he said, "Communism is for losers, we don't want it."    

So it's like working on many different levels.  

We don't understand that either. So many different levels! 

Let's be fair. As best we can tell, no one but Shillue stooped to talking about "the Commies" this day. But the messaging continued through the program's first half hour, with The MAGA Four all issuing C-bombs and with Tarlov being interrupted, as is the norm on this show.   

This is no country for intelligent discourse! Or at least, that's the impression we may get when we watch this top-rated "cable news" TV program. 

The viewership for The Five dwarfs that of corresponding programs on CNN and MS NOW. In our view, this helps explain the salience of Jeffrey Rosen's month-old essay for The Atlantic.

Rosen's essay appears beneath this dual headline. Who the heck is Jeffrey Rosen, and why is he saying these things?

IDEAS
American Democracy Wasn’t Designed for This  
Can our 18th-century institutions survive 21st-century technology?

Can our institutions survive? Who the heck is Jeffrey Rosen, and why is he asking a question like that?  

For today, we'll limit ourselves to your initial question. The leading authority starts its profile as shown:

Jeffrey Rosen (legal academic)  

Jeffrey Rosen (born February 13, 1964) is an American legal scholar, journalist, and author.

Rosen is a law professor at The George Washington University, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) and the author of nine books, including New York Times bestsellers. He served as the President and CEO of the National Constitution Center from 2013 to 2026, where he is now CEO Emeritus. Rosen is a contributing writer for The Atlantic. He was a longtime legal affairs editor of The New Republic and was a staff writer for The New Yorker. He was also a writer for The New York Times Magazine and many other outlets. 

[...]  

Rosen attended the Dalton School, a private college preparatory school on New York City's Upper East Side, and graduated in 1982 as valedictorian. He then studied English literature and government at Harvard University, graduating in 1986 with a Bachelor of Arts, summa cum laude. He was subsequently a Marshall Scholar at Balliol College, Oxford, in philosophy, politics, and economics, from which he received a second bachelor's degree in 1988. He then attended the Yale Law School, where he served as a senior editor of the Yale Law Journal and graduated with a Juris Doctor in 1991.  

He started as one of those "good grades" types, then seemed to mature from there. In our own experienceAttention, C-Span Viewers!he's presented many worthwhile legal forums during his years at the National Constitution Center.

And now, this month-old essay appears.  

As we noted yesterday, President Lincoln wanted to know if a nation like ours could hope to "long endure." In his essay for the Atlantic, Rosen seems to be saying this:   

Maybe not!

Also, can our institutions survive? As you can guess from his the Atllantic's dual headline, Rosen seems to say the answer might be no.   

Why in the world is he saying such things? And in what way might an agitprop pig-pile like The Five be part of the ongoing story?

We think the gentleman's aim is true. Tomorrow, we'll start to explain.   

Tomorrow: Rosen lays out his key points