TUESDAY: Bernie Moreno's a red state senator!

TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 2026

He agrees with Elizabeth Warren: The madness of the current rulers keeps us focused on topics like this:    

Karoline Leavitt Returns to Blast ‘Deranged’ Algae Protesters at Reflecting Pool   

For the full report, just click here. "Only the Democrats could hate beautifying our nation’s capital," the press sec thoughtfully said upon her return from maternity leave.

Karoline Leavitt is back at her post—and childbirth hasn't tamed her! That said, the distractions never cease at this point. That would include the current tussle concerning algae and its discontents.   

(If you stand it on its end, the Reflecting Pool would be taller than major skyscrapers, the president has thoughtfully said on several occasions. On this campus, one youthful analyst quickly retorted: If you stand Interstate 95 on its end, it would reach even higher than that!)

Algae growth is in the news. Topics like the one discussed below almost never are at this point. Guest essay headline included:   

Bernie Moreno and Elizabeth Warren: Our Plan to Save Social Security

One of us is a Republican from Ohio who built a business that generated hundreds of jobs. The other is a Democrat from Massachusetts who built a career protecting consumers from financial tricks and traps.

We don’t agree on everything, but here’s one thing we do agree on: Congress must act now to save Social Security for generations of Americans to come.

Social Security is a core component of our nation’s promise—a covenant between the federal government and Americans who pay into it throughout their working years so they can retire with dignity.

That promise is at risk of unraveling. For years, seniors in Ohio and Massachusetts have told us how concerned they are about the future of Social Security. A new report from the trustees who oversee the Social Security Trust Funds shows they are right to worry: Unless Congress acts, the fund from which most Social Security beneficiaries are paid will be significantly depleted by late 2032. After that, Social Security benefits could be cut by more than 20 percent.

That promise of Social Security is at risk of unraveling? Within living memory, claims like that were routinely dismissed, often correctly so, as a scare tactic from some on the right, or were scorned as a bit of hyperbole from centrist budget hawks.   

Within living memory, that's how it was! Today, along comes this guest essay—and a proposal—from Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio), but also from Elizabeth Warren.

(We pause to let Jesse Watters and Greg Gutfeld issue their extremely tired Pocahontas jokes.)   

We may return to their proposal at a later date. It arrives in the New York Times two weeks after this guest essay by Jason Furman, which we cited when it appeared:

I Worked in the White House. We Never Imagined This Problem Would Get This Bad.  

The first major public policy issue I worked on in the White House, almost 30 years ago, was President Bill Clinton’s call to “save Social Security first.” Though the fund wasn’t projected to run dry for another three decades, the country seemed gripped by the issue. A few years later, George W. Bush felt strongly enough about the looming crisis that he spent much of his political capital pushing a strategy to resolve it.

This week the Social Security trustees announced that the trust fund for retirees and survivors will be exhausted in just six years. That’s six years before tens of millions of Americans could see their benefits cut by 22 percent. The crisis is closer than anyone in the Clinton or Bush years ever imagined we might let it get...

Furman was chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers under President Obama. We never thought it would get this bad, the headline on his guest essay said.   

How do Furman's representations fit with the claims and suggestions of Moreno and Warren? How do his representations fit with their proposal?

That's a conversation you're unlikely to see! Inept as such discussions often were, there was a time, within living memory, when budget discussions were commonly spotted, even in major newspapers. Given the madness of the age, such discussions are near extinction and such sightings have become very rare.   

Also this:   

We continue to peruse the (improved) results among 9-year-old students from last year's NAEP testing. Those results came from the Long-Term Trend version of the NAEP, not from the so-called "Main NAEP."

There are various ways to present those new data, depending on where you decide to start your comparison. Having said that, we'll also say this:

Below, you see the start of the news report in the New York Times about those new test scores. In our initial mention of those new scores, we said you'd see no further discussion of this matter, and our pledge to you was correct:

Younger Students’ Test Scores Bounce Back After the Pandemic

After years of dire test scores coming out of the pandemic, new national test results released on Wednesday offered a glimmer of hope—at least for younger students.

The nation’s 9-year-olds, who were in preschool when the pandemic hit, have made a significant recovery in reading since 2022, and are now caught up to where 9-year-olds were immediately before the pandemic, according to a key federal exam. They are getting closer to being caught up in math.

The Times report continued from there. In the near future, we'll show you several ways to think about these new test scores. In the face of the fight against the killer algae, the discussion will end right there!

Meanwhile, two solons have agreed on a cure. One is a D and one is an R. Who ever heard of that?

RACE: Maya Wiley is very sharp!

TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 2026

Are we sure she got this right? Philip Kennicott works for the Washington Post. At this link, the newspaper thumbnails his tenure:   

Philip Kennicott  

Philip Kennicott is the Pulitzer Prize-winning art and architecture critic of The Washington Post. He has been on staff at The Post since 1999, first as classical music critic, then as culture critic. In 2011, he combined art and architecture into a beat focused on visual culture and public space. He is now the Post's culture critic, focused on cultural issues and the arts in general.  

According to the leading authority, he graduated summa cum laude from Yale—with a degree in philosophy, no less!  

Be all that as it may, Kennicott likes the Obama Presidential Center more than some other critics. Back on June 2, his review of the complex appeared beneath this dual headline:   

Art
The Obama Center opens as a time warp to an old political order   
Despite a range of controversies, the Obama Presidential Center makes a good first impression—even the “Obamalisk” at its center. 

Early in his review, Kennicott mentioned the current president's "childish meme on social media" about the Obama Center. In that childish meme, the current president had portrayed the center as "a monumental trash can surrounded by an urban clutter of cars and telephone poles." 

So our failing nation's Ozymandias had portrayed the place. Along the way in his own review, Kennicott offered this intriguing claim:  

Something dark and catastrophic was brewing during the Obama years, and it seems, in hindsight, that America was sleeping when it should have been on alert.

"Something dark and catastrophic was brewing?" Some will agree, some won't. 

Almost surely, Kennicott was alleging the existence of "something dark and catastrophic" on the right, but the current version of that strain was brewing well before the Obama years—for example, in the crackpot attempts by the very pious Reverend Falwell to persuade the world that Bill and Hillary Clinton had apparently somehow been involved in a wide array of murders.  

So the pious Falwell had pimped it out during the bulk of the 1990s. During that juncture, the darker forces on the right were also attempting to prove that Hillary Clinton was involved, somehow, in the death (by suicide) of Vince Foster, a high Clinton official and a lifelong Clinton friend. 

In short:

Long before the Obama years, blatantly crackpot behavior was general over America as something dark and catastrophic—and baldly deranged—intruded itself on the discourse.  

The Clintons murder the folks they don't like? How much cracked pottery has been involved in the attempt to keep this theme alive, even in the present day?

If you watch the garbage can the Fox News Channel spills out each night at 10 p.m. Eastern, you'll see a baldly disordered cable news nutcase who works, on an almost nightly basis, to keep the image of Hillary Clinton as a murderer alive. This is the garbage can his corporate owners have chosen. 

Also, this is the garbage can Blue America agrees to ignore.

"Something dark and catastrophic was brewing?" Did this strain go national in 1988, when Rush Limbaugh's radio program entered national syndication? 

In March 1994, this tiny man behind the bluster and girth shoved the garbage can down the road on the way to its current residence in the halls of the Gutfeld! program. In this report in July 1994, Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) started by recalling the basics of what had happened:   

Koppel Covers for Limbaugh’s Rumor-Mongering   

Ted Koppel’s special (ABC Viewpoint, 4/19/94) on press coverage of Whitewater was a perfect opportunity to take Rush Limbaugh to task for spreading unfounded conspiracy theories. But instead, ABC journalists Koppel and Jeff Greenfield let Limbaugh off the hook.  

On his March 10 radio broadcast, Limbaugh had announced the following in urgent tones:   

"OK, folks, I think I got enough information here to tell you about the contents of this fax that I got. Brace yourselves. This fax contains information that I have just been told will appear in a newsletter to Morgan Stanley sales personnel this afternoon…. What it is is a bit of news which says… there’s a Washington consulting firm that has scheduled the release of a report that will appear, it will be published, that claims that Vince Foster was murdered in an apartment owned by Hillary Clinton, and the body was then taken to Fort Marcy Park."

So said Limbaugh that day, live and direct from the syndicated garbage can. As happenstance had it, we were driving through West Virginia that afternoon. We heard this shot heard round the world as we motored along.   

El Rushbo had offered fresh garbage right from the can, as his successors do today on a nightly basis. The report by FAIR continued:

[continuing directly]
After he returned from a commercial break, Limbaugh began referring to the story as a “rumor,” but continued to claim that the story was that “the Vince Foster suicide was not a suicide.”

Limbaugh was referring to an item in a newsletter put out by the Washington, D.C. firm of Johnson Smick International. The newsletter, relating a rumor that has no apparent basis in fact, reported that White House attorney Foster’s suicide occurred in an apartment owned by White House associates, and that his body was moved to the park where it was found.

Limbaugh took this baseless rumor from a small insiders’ newsletter and broadcast it to his radio audience of millions, adding his own new inaccuracies: The newsletter did not report–as Limbaugh claimed–that Foster was murdered, or that the apartment was owned by Hillary Rodham Clinton. Limbaugh’s repetition of an unfounded rumor has been credited (Chicago Tribune, 3/11/94; Newsweek, 3/21/94) with contributing to a plunge in the stock market on the day it was aired.  

The fallout from El Rushbo's garbage was enormous. Even then, something dark and catastrophic was emerging, on a daily basis, from the nation's garbage can.  

At this point, we jump ahead 32 years, to Sunday evening, June 14 of the present year.

We jump ahead to the UFC event staged on the White House lawn that evening. Just to refresh you, the garbage can popped open that night and this dumbbell emerged:  

After White House bout, UFC fighter disparages Michelle Obama as ‘a man’

UFC fighter Josh Hokit used his post-bout interview Sunday night at the White House to disparage former first lady Michelle Obama.

In a post-fight interview, the heavyweight fighter praised President Donald Trump for hosting the event, which was intended to celebrate America’s 250th birthday.

He then insulted the mother of one of his rivals, thanked Jesus and ended by shouting: “And lastly—Michelle Obama is a man! Am I right, America?”

Some in the audience laughed at Hokit’s remark, which is rooted in a baseless far-right conspiracy theory. Right-wing podcaster Joe Rogan, who was conducting the post-fight interview, did not follow up with Hokit on the comment.

So began Amy Wang's report about what happened that night.   

The following day, on Deadline: White House, Nicolle Wallace didn't mention this moronic, insulting event. On Tuesday, she spoke about the event with Maya Wiley, who began by saying this:   

Well, let me start by saying this. This is racist.  

Later, Wiley described Hokit's ugly / stupid behavior as "bigotry." She said, "This is evil come alive in words,"

Maya Wiley is very sharp. To our eye and ear, she seemed to be stricken this day, and there's no obvious reason why she shouldn't have been.    

By now, the claim had fairly widely spread—the claim that Hokit's pathetic performance had been a racist attack. But is it clear that that's the case? Is it possible that something else was going on when Hokit launched his pitiful attack?   

We ask that question for a reason. As we've frequently noted, the little tramp who hosts the Gutfeld! pigsty routinely spreads the theme that Michelle Obama is secretly a man, and that Barack Obama is secretly gay.  

As it turns out, that dual theme stretches back at least to 2014, when the increasingly sour Joan Rivers let it crawl out on the land. But even as we've seen the aforementioned cable star pimp that theme about Michelle Obama, we've seen him relentlessly pimp the same theme about Randi Weingarten, and we've seen him and the droogs with whom he surrounds himself burn the time away by asking if Brigitte Macron, the first lady of France, does or does not "have a penis."  

We'll walk you through some history this week, including some history about the way the slimy El Rushbo spoke about first lady Hillary Clinton—and about Chelsea Clinton, when she was 13 years old.  Full disclosure: 

When we let these creeps hold forth (as we constantly do), there are few restraints on where these creeps will go. 

Our guess would be that what's currently bothering them is frequently something other than race. The "masculinism" is all around, and it's a powerful, braindead force.

With these ruminations, we're on our way back to the way Blue American elites reacted to those recent Supreme Court redistricting decisions. But also to questions like these: 

Will we Blues be able to win elections in the future? Also, is it possible that we Blues sometimes react in ways which might make that task much harder?

Tomorrow: Through our inexcusable silence, these are the creeps we've chosen

MONDAY: Charlie Hurt screeched and screamed!

MONDAY, JUNE 22, 2026

Did he possibly get it right? This morning, we posted some of the lowlights of Saturday morning's three-headed review of the Obama Presidential Center. 

We refer to the screeching, screaming, gong-show behavior of the three co-hosts of the Fox & Friends Weekend program. We're inclined to think that Griff Jenkins knows better. The other two, not so much.    

In fairness, no one was pictured as an ape this day. No one said that Michelle Obama is a man, or that Barack Obama is gay. 

One extremely strange star in the channel's prime time lineup toys with the latter two themes on a semi-regular basis, but no one did that on Fox & Friends Weekend this week.  

On the other hand, the dim-witted messaging flowed like the waters of a mighty stream. As we showed you this morning, eternal teen-ager Charlie Hurt was soon dishing this:

JENKINS: ...President Obama's Presidential Center, which opened up on the South Side of Chicago, has been panned as a bit of an ugly structure.

CAMPOS-DUFFY: It would have been like a death star—

JENKINS: What do you call it? 

CAMPOS-DUFFY: I call it the North Korean watchtower. Charlie likes to call it a garbage can. 

HURT: It does, because it looks like a public park, and it's in a public park. So it looks like one of those trash cans in a public park. You just walk in and shove your entire, all your McDonald's garbage, like right through the panel and then you just drop it.  

It looks like a place where you'd shove all your garbage! All in all, it can sometimes seem like it's "garbage in, garbage out" on this tribal messaging program.   

As we noted, some or most architecture critics—not all—have panned the external design of the center's main building. But on Fox & Friends Weekend, when Barack Obama's name is mentioned, the Fox News Channel "conservative insult culture" is likely to take instant hold.   

The new building looks like a trash can, Hurt later said.

Again—no one was called an ape, and no one was called a man! Also, is it possible that Charlie Hurt—screaming and yelling, as you can easily see—was actually noting a questionable part of the Blue American political playbook when he screamed and screeched in the manner shown below?  

JENKINS (6/20/26): You know, it's interesting, by the way—the whole ceremony began with Valerie Jarrett, Obama's senior adviser, and she started the whole ceremony by recognizing stolen land.  

Charlie?  

HURT (shouting): Why'd they build it there, then, if it's on stolen land? Give it baaaack! [Briefly inaudible] the building is already there! And you can't tear the building down!

You literally built it on land that you're crying about being stolen! Give it baaaaaack! 

And so on from there. It was quite a "journalistic" performance.

The co-host was unmistakably screeching. It ought to be a national emergency when news clowns behave like that on major "cable news" shows. On the other hand, is it possible that Hurt might be arguably possibly somewhat right? 

We noticed several analysts cringe when Jarrett delivered the "land acknowledgement." They told us that "land acknowledgements" are empty gestures performed in bad faith from which there's only one result:

Every time we Blues deliver a land acknowledgement, these fiery young analysts cried, another ten thousand Trump voters are said to get their wings,

We'll admit that we were surprised to see Jarrfett deliver the acknowledgment. We'd like to see more attention paid to the histories and the present circumstances of indigenous / native / first people tribes. 

That said, these gestures do strike us as blatantly phony, pretty much all the way down. "You can only imagine how these gestures look to Others," one young analyst cried.

The friends seemed to think that the youngster was right! Hurt screeched and screamed as he and Campos-Duffy mocked the gesture.

Could it be that we the Blues sometimes defeat ourselves?

RACE: Is there any possible way...

MONDAY, JUNE 22, 2026

...we Blues help MAGA win? Whatever you think of the PM's politics, we admire the cut of her jib.   

In what may be his latest attempt at distraction, our sitting president made an odd claim about the Italian PM. Inevitably, his claim sounded condescending, insulting.  

Presumably, no one believed his statement was true, but there he went again! As you can see in this news report, Prime Minister Giorgi Meloni shot back hard (in translation):   

PRIME MINISTER MELONI (6/CC/26): Certain things deserve an immediate response. 

Donald Trump’s statements are completely fabricated / made up. I am frankly stunned / appalled.

I don’t know why the president of the United States behaves this way toward his own allies. It’s not the first time this has happened, after all.   

I don’t know why [he[ behaves this way, the Italian prime minister said. With regret, we're prepared to guess that everybody else does!   

This latest idiotic feud continues to unfold. It began with a weird remark by Trump—perhaps with his latest attempt to create a distraction from the unpleasant news of the world. 

We like the way the PM shot back She even offered this::    

There is one thing he must remember: Italy and I do not / never beg.  

The PM pushed back hard!  Whatever you may think of her politics, we like the cut of her jib!

At any rate, everyone knows why the president behaves the does. In the end, it may track back to cognitive decline—or it may trace back to cognitive decline layered atop decades of untreated medical / mental health disorders.  

Presumably, that's why he behaves the way he does. Presumably, that's why he stages his endless, brain cell-destroying claims, including the recent claim that ABC's Jonathan Karl has been involved in attempts to vandalize the Reflecting Pool:   

Trump Claims ‘Vandalism’ Caused Reflecting Pool Debacle, Accuses ABC Reporter of Trying To Make It Worse 

President Donald Trump is now claiming that the problems with the newly renovated Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool were caused by unidentified vandals.  

The president has taken a personal interest in the renovations and frequently raised the topic during press gaggles. Since the job was completed, the pool has been plagued by algae blooms. This week, visitors to the pool began to notice paint peeling away from the bottom. The algae has given the pool a distinct green hue instead of the intended American flag blue. Some tourists have reportedly been ripping off pieces of the paint to take as souvenirs.

Trump addressed the problems on Friday night in a post on Truth Social. 

[...]   

For good measure, Trump accused ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent Jonathan Karl of “trying to rip the rubber off of the surface."  

Implausible claims about the alleged vandalism have continued through the weekend, complete with at least one actual arrest by the Park Police. The president's implausible claims about Meloni have also continued, with the typical insults thrown in.  

(Significant) cognitive decline is always a personal tragedy. So is (serious) mental illness. We assume that everyone knows that some such tragedy is possibly at play here—a tragedy which is also quite dangerous.   

With regret, we can't offer any such excuse for the "journalism" we saw performed on Saturday morning's Fox & Friends Weekend, when the program's three co-hosts enjoyed some good solid fun regarding the newly opened Obama Presidential Center.  

Full disclosure! Fox & Friends Weekend is an imitation of life. And so, after praising the sitting president's superb aesthetic eye, the friends started in on the Obama building.   

The mockery went on and on, with the typical insults thrown in. In their first hour on Saturday morning, the friends praised the new color scheme on the new Air Force 1, then transitioned as shown:

CAMPOS-DUFFY (6/20/26): Well, I think [the new Air Force One] looks good. I still like the baby blue. But you know, this looks beautiful, and the waving flag on the back. It's sharp.

JENKINS: It's sharper than President Obama's Presidential Center, which opened up on the South Side of Chicago—

HURT: [Laughter]

JENKINS: —which has been panned as a bit of an ugly structure.

In fact, the building's external appearance has been panned by many, not all, observers. Though never, perhaps, like this

CAMPOS-DUFFY (continuing directly): It would have been like a death star—

JENKINS: What do you call it? 

CAMPOS-DUFFY: I call it the North Korean watchtower. Charlie likes to call it a garbage can. 

HURT: It does, because it looks like a public park, and it's in a public park. So it looks like one of those trash cans in a public park. You just walk in and shove your entire, all your McDonald's garbage, like right through the panel and then you just drop it.   

The nimrods were off to a very fast "cable news" start. 

Of the three, Griff Jenkins knows better. Charlie Hurt? Probably not. And Campos-Duffy loathes Obama. Of that there can be little doubt.

Hurt, of course, was simply fellating President Trump, who had initiated the "garbage can / dumpster" imagery with this earlier thoughtful critique:   

Trump Imagines Obama Library Will Be a Giant Dumpster Surrounded By Homeless Tents   

President Donald Trump has a depressing vision for what former President Barack Obama’s new presidential library will morph into.

The president posted an AI-generated image of what he believes Obama’s library will look like in 2036—a giant grey dumpster with a big black bag of trash spilling out of it, surrounded by homeless people and tents. Trump’s post showed the homeless milling around the ugly building with a dreary Chicago skyline in the background.

Trump’s Truth Social post was captioned: “The Barack Hussein Obama Library, in 10 years, when fully matured!”  

And so on from there. Charlie was simply advancing Preferred Presidential Imagery as he kissed the president's asp.   

At any rate, that's the way the trio of journalists started their thoughtful discussion. Their performance went on for roughly four minutes. During that time, as you can see, the trio of friends described the presidential center as:   

This really hideous building (RCD) 
That disgusting building (RCD) 
This monstrosity (RCD)  
A giant trash can (Hurt)  

Driven along by Campos-Duffy, the architectural critics were IN!

Along the way, Campos-Duffy complained, two separate times, about the fact that someone with such bad aesthetic taste as Obama "had the gall" to have "taken jabs" at the more accomplished President Trump during his speech at the opening of the center.   

That said, what jabs had Obama taken at Trump during his 34-minute speech? Eventually, producers played the four alleged jabs you see below. We haven't omitted a word of what Fox viewers were shown:   

PRESIDENT OBAMA (6/20/26): ...in the newly independent United States, there will be no kings or lords, no serfs or subjects, but only citizens....  

...economic disruptions, mass protests, backlash against mass protests, political conflicts that have shaken the very foundation of our democracy...

The good Reverend was under no illusions about the perils and obstacles facing the abolitionist cause...  

...the same spirit that will see America and the world through its present trials.   

There you see the shards of speech, yanked completely out of context, which were offered to Red American viewers as Obama's insolent "jabs" at Trump. Those were the most offensive "jabs" producers could cull from the full-length speech.

In that first excerpt, Obama was talking about the goals of the founders in 1776. The second shard—with the phrase "a terrible pandemic" omitted—was yanked from a longer list of challenges the nation has encountered in the decade since he left office, four years of which occurred under President Biden.

The third alleged jab was a reference to the abolitionist views of Reverend Theodore Parker—back in the 1850s! The fourth shard was so totally ripped from any context that it made little sense as a free-standing statement.  

Poor Campos-Duffy! She was appalled to think that a man like Obama had taken so many jabs at a brilliant aesthete like President Trump!

Lost to memory on this show—in this imitation of human life—was the sitting president's astonishing Truth Social post in which he himself had compared the Obama Center to a garbage can. 

Also forgotten by Campos-Duffy was an earlier jab like this:    

Trump Posts Video Depicting Barack and Michelle Obama as Apes    

Campos-Duffy is paid large sums to disappear moments like that.   

This Fox & Friends Weekend pseudo-discussion rolled on and on, with Hurt supplying the peals of laughter and Campos-Duffy calling the names. This imitation of a news discussion finally came to an end with the sated Campos-Duffy happily saying this:  

CAMPOS-DUFFY: All right. Well, that was fun, you guys! It's just not fun for the people of the South Side who have to wake up every morning and see that thing!

Simply put, the lady can't stop. She's amazingly genial among her own, like this with respect to others.

These are the fruits of our nation's so-called "democratization of media." In this case, these are the fruits of demonically partisan "cable news" broadcasts in which every word is designed to please viewers living in one of our tribal Americas.  

For the record, the trio of friends didn't mention the insult aimed at Michelle Obama right there on the White House lawn the previous Sunday night. 

A UFC fighter, playing the fool, had directed an insulting remark at Mrs. Obama. For the record, versions of that same insult are routinely directed at the former first lady on the Fox News Channel, but no one in Blue America bothers to say a word.   

In this case, the insult was unloosed right on the White House lawn. On this one occasion, the overpaid stars of Blue America somehow managed to stir themselves to respond.   

Maya Wylie is very sharp. She appeared on Deadline: White House last Tuesday, where she joined Nicolle Wallace is discussing what the UFC fighter had said. 

Tomorrow, we're going to show you what Wiley and Wallace said. For today, we've given you a small taste of the evolving world of our failing nation's increasingly clownlike public discourse. 

With that in mind, we restate an important question:   

We've lost two elections to President Trump. There is absolutely no assurance that we'll regain the House this fall (although it may be that we will).

For reasons we cited last week, electoral politics may get even harder in the years to come. 

Tomorrow, we'll look at what Wylie said about the moronic remark the UFC fighter made on the White House lawn. But for today, we'll ask you again:

Is there anything we Blues may be inclined to do which may perhaps be helping to drive this ongoing disaster along?

Tomorrow: What Wiley (and others) said

SATURDAY: It's hard to stomach the kind of behavior...

SATURDAY, JUNE 20, 2026

...we wrote about yesterday morning: It's hard to stomach the kind of behavior we wrote about yesterday morning.   

In contexts like this, we largely avoid the term "misogyny." We're happy to go with "masculinism"—but the mutts they send out to perform on the Fox News Channel behave that way every night of the week.  

Blue America's major orgs never say a word about it. This is the imitation of life we've unmistakably chosen. 

Who's worse? The mutts they send out every night? Or our lauded high-end Blue elites?