SATURDAY: Did Democrats sweep the Lone Star State?

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2026

Let's take a look at the House:  As our flailing nation's fleet of airplanes struggle to get back up in the air, we thought you might be interested in a few election notes. 

We'll start in the Lone Star State:

It wasn't just Governor-elect Hinojosa and Senator-elect Talarico! This report in the New York Times described a wider sweep:  

How Democrats Turned Texas Blue   

It wasn’t just that James Talarico won the U.S. Senate race or that Gina Hinojosa defeated Greg Abbott, the three-term governor. Up and down the ballot, Democrats swept Texas, winning all of the top statewide offices. They also flipped the Texas House of Representatives.

Every county in Texas shifted left, voting more Democratic than two years ago when President Trump was on the ballot. Rural counties like Jefferson in the Piney Woods region of deep red East Texas, Lubbock just south of the Panhandle and Midland in the Permian Basin, known as the epicenter of Texas oil and gas, all moved to the left. So did suburban counties outside Houston and Dallas. Even big cities, already centers of Democratic power, saw further gains.  

Democrats swept Texas last week! They even "flipped the Texas House of Representatives!"   

That has been the standard story—and that story has largely been accurate. Today, though, we direct your attention to last week's races for the state's 38 congressional seats—the 38 seats Texas holds in the United States House of Representatives.

When it comes to those 38 congressional races, Democrats didn't sweep the state at all! Here are the basic facts about the way that part of the cookie crumbled:

Winners of Texas congressional races
Republicans: 24 seats
Democrats: 14 seats
Total vote, statewide, in Texas congressional races
Republican candidates: 4.59 million votes (46.9%)
Democratic candidates: 5.15 million votes (52.6%)

So it went! Even as they were sweeping the state, Democrats were winning only 14 of its 38 seats in the House. 

(For a digest of the 38 races, you can just click here.)

Republican candidates won 24 of the 38 seats, despite receiving far fewer votes statewide than their Democratic counterparts. Presumably, gerrymandering played a key role in that outcome, though some other factors may have been involved.

The woods are lovely, dark and deep? Except for the "lovely" part, so are our sprawling nation's complex electoral procedures.

Also today, we'd planned to revisit the Nebraska Senate race, in which Republican incumbent Pete Ricketts held onto his seat by a bit less than six points. 

For a reason we don't want to revisit, that race was just too disappointing. For today, we'll agree to be grateful for the widespread pushback which actually did occur.


AMERICANA: Are these the days of miracle, wonder?

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2026

Republican voters choose Donalds: "These are the days of miracle and wonder?"   

Paul Simon said it long ago. It was a key take-away from his Graceland album, (in part) an album about the miracle of worldwide human connection. 

Could that statement be true today? The New York Times has imagined just that, in a lengthy report by Jess Bidgood which starts exactly like this:   

Blue Texas? Battleground Kansas? Both Parties Wonder if the Map Has Shifted.  

Texas. Kansas. Mississippi.

Democrats’ surprising midterm victories in states that had long seemed out of reach for them have dangled a fundamental question in front of both parties, one with major implications for the 2028 presidential election and maybe for the country’s understanding of itself: Could America’s political map, long defined by tribalism and calcification, be changing?

Since the Obama era, just seven states have really been battlegrounds in presidential elections. In the Senate, red-state Democrats and blue-state Republicans became endangered species. State lawmakers narrowed the amount of competitive House seats through redistricting. The nation was dug in.

But this year, seven of Democrats’ eight Senate flips have come in states that their party has not won in a presidential election since 2012. In another historically red state, Alaska, the Democrat is narrowly ahead but the race is uncalled. Democrats flipped House seats in districts President Trump won by more than 15 percentage points two years ago. They won every statewide office in Texas, broke the Republican gerrymander of North Carolina and even won two statewide races in deep-red Indiana.     

Has the (political) map of America shifted? In the text of her essay, Bidgood mentioned Mississippi only once, right there in the opening line shown above. Almost surely, Scott Colom's historic win in that state's Senate race hadn't been decided or declared when Bidgood created her text. 

Has the map of America changed? Has Texas turned blue? Have we moved on to Battleground Kansas?

In the most astounding question of all, has Mississippi turned purple? We're going to guess that the answer is no, for a fairly obvious reason:   

Senator-elect Colom dared to struggle and dared to win, but he narrowly beat a stunningly unskilled incumbent in a very unusual year. The political backdrop of this year involved the endless bizarre behavior of a sitting president who is mentally ill in an untreated way—bizarre behavior which was so relentless that it surely drove many voters away from the Red American team.   

That bizarre behavior isn't likely to stop, nor is it likely that Blue America's upper end press corps will ever be willing to discuss the fairly obvious medical source of that endless, unhinged conduct. 

No one knows where his (untreated) disorders will take us. We note this report, for example:

Trump Says He Wants to Get Cuba ‘Done’ Before Leaving Office

President Donald Trump told conservative commentator Hugh Hewitt that he’s not ruling out military intervention to accomplish regime change in Cuba.

“I want to get Cuba done before I leave,” Trump told Hewitt in a phone call on Thursday.

“And we have a very good, talented guy for Cuba named Marco, because Marco’s parents are from—Marco Rubio—his parents are from Cuba, as you probably know and he would love to do that,” Trump continued. “So we’re watching it very closely. It’s doing very poorly. It’s essentially a failed, you know place, nation, whatever you want to call it.”

“It’s failed and we’re watching it. I would like to be able to do it. I won the Cuban vote by 94% in Florida and I think I’m more popular now than I was then and, frankly, I’d love to be able to do it..."

And so on from there. o, we aren'''t making that up.

For the medical reason cited above, the person in question will almost surely never come to realize that his judgment and instincts are disastrously poor. He thought Iran would be a snap, and he'll likely feel the same way about Cuba. 

Domestic turmoil would likely follow as we head toward November 2028.   Back to the Magnolia State:  

Senator Colom, who dared to struggle, won by only one point. If we ever escape the force field of a president who is mentally ill, that fact suggests that Mississippi will still be a Republican state, if we ever make it that far.  

For right now, consider this. Once again, consider the passage which opened Jia Lynn Yang's news analysis in that same New York Times:   

NEWS ANALYSIS
They Made History as ‘Firsts.’ That’s Not What They Ran On.  

The first Muslim senator. The first Black woman to be elected governor of any state. The first openly gay male senator. The first Black governor of Florida. The first elected Hispanic governors in Texas and in California.

The number of “firsts” achieved on Tuesday’s elections was extraordinary. Barriers came crashing down across the country. And yet during the campaigns, the candidates themselves hardly uttered a word about being on the precipice of history. There were no exhortations to vote for a particular person because “representation matters.”   

The first Black governor of Florida? That of course is Governor-elect Byron Donalds, the incoming Republican governor of the Sunshine State, the red state which hung on. 

It was Republicans who voted Donalds in, making history as they did. Up in Michigan, that state's Republicans voted for another Black nominee, Candidate John James—but where Candidate Donalds won, Candidate James lost.   

We wouldn't have voted for Donalds or James, but we note that Republicans in two major states did. Let's move to South Carolina, which elected a Democrat, Dr. Annie Andrews, in its Senate race:

This year, South Carolina's Republicans foolishly followed the sitting president's nutty advice in that Senate race. They nominated a poorly qualified candidate. Almost surely, that helped Andrews win.

Earlier, though, South Carolina's Republican voters sent Tim Scott to the Senate. They did so in a 2014 special election. They re-elected him in 2016 and 2022. In November 2028, they may even do it again.   

(How was Scott first elected to the House? In the 2010 Republican primary, a run-off was held between Scott and Paul Thurmond, who was—yes!—Senator Strom Thurmond's son! Were those the days of miracle and wonder? South Carolina's Republican voters could have elected the son of Strom Thurmond. But they decided, way back then, that they'd go with the Black guy instead.)    

We wouldn't have voted for Scott, but South Carolina's Republican voters did. 

There's much, much more to be said about South Carolina's Republican voters, who sent Nikki Haley to the governor's mansion when she was just 39. There's mountains more to say about the larger topic of race in America. 

We're omitting the mystery ride of Frederick Douglass—his history-altering, daring train ride out of the city in which we live. We're omitting the letter the Los Angeles pen pal sent to one of our own fifth grade students long ago, in the bicentennial year. 

("You must be very proud to be growing up in the city where a great man like Frederick Douglass lived," that Los Angeles girl had written, after being told that the Baltimore girl was reading a book about Douglass. If memory serves, she and her family were living in Westwood. The letters of those antique pen pals were being written across the "racial" lines the pair had been forced to grow up with. The Baltimore girl to whom we refer, like her friends NAME WITHHELD and NAME WITHHELD, had an extremely kind heart. When we were shown the letter she'd written, the Los Angeles girl impressed us in a way we haven't forgotten.)  

This year, Democrats ran candidates who grew from the cultural soil of their respective states. It turned out very well in this, a spectacular, sprawling continental nation with a wide array of varying culture zones. 

Almost surely, the untreated disorders of the sitting president helped pull some of those candidates into the winner's circle. With respect to Governor-elect Donalds, we wouldn't have voted for him ourselves. On the other hand, we Blues haven't always been gracious enough to take yes for an answer when it comes to the way Red America's Republican voters have moved away from the past.

The state of Nebraska didn't come through in this year's Senate races. Tomorrow, without disrespecting the candidate in question, we'll consider one possible reason. We'll also recall what Paul Thurmond later said.

Democrats went with Colom.  Republicans went with Donalds.

Tomorrow: What Paul Thurmond said


THURSDAY: Sitting president reverts to form, part 2!

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2026

The problem we're still all facing: David French says that Pete Hegseth should have been impeached this week. 

Beyond that, he says that Hegseth should be impeached next year, after Democrats take control of both Houses of Congress.  He gives detailed reasons for his view—and French, as you know, is smart.   

His reasoning may make technical sense. On the other hand, we give you this latest reversion to form by the sitting president:

Trump Erupts at ‘CORRUPT AND EVIL’ Democrats, Others in Flurry of Early-Morning Truth Social Posts

President Donald Trump was up early on Thursday, unleashing several Truth Social screeds to eviscerate the “CORRUPT AND EVIL” Democrats who have accused his White House of corruption.

Posting to Truth Social just before 6 a.m., Trump called Democrats “the most Corrupt and anti-American groups of political leaders and hacks,” and accused the party of calling his administration corrupt to distract from “TREMENDOUS & UNPRECEDENTED” fraud in blue states.   

And so on from there. 

Below, you see the first of five such posts by the disordered president. In his report for Mediaite, Tom Durante posts the texts of four of the Truth Social posts:  

Truth Details   

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

The Democrat Party, lead by one of the most Corrupt and anti-American groups of political leaders and hacks in the history of our Country, and even the World, is doing everything in their power to get away from MASSIVE BLUE STATE CORRUPTION by saying, over and over again, that the Trump Administration is corrupt. It is a sound bite that they viciously use, over and over again, in order to nullify the TREMENDOUS & UNPRECEDENTED theft that has taken place in our Blue States – Minnesota, California, and others, all over the U.S.A. I, perhaps foolishly because the Fake News refuses to write about it, including in my First Term, don’t even take a Salary, worth Millions of Dollars. I am the only President to have done so! In any event, THE DEMOCRATS ARE CORRUPT AND EVIL, and I am the exact opposite! Fight hard, Republicans, or you won’t have a Country left! President DONALD J. TRUMP    

This man will function as sitting president for more than two more years. How do you think he'll choose to run the Department of Defense if Hegseth is suddenly gone?

On its face, the president's presence in office seems dangerous. It would help if Democrats and denizens of  Blue America understood the various ways our own bad judgment, and  our own dishonesty, helped send him to the Oval Office for each of his two terms.   

Sadly, we Blues helped create this dangerous situation; we aren't always perfectly sharp. And even now, our political and journalistic leaders still refuse to discuss the president's likely medical / mental health situation in a serious way.  

In the meantime, factions are already starting to form among us Blues, as factions are wont to do. Wisely or otherwise, some Dems already seem to be hoping for one, two, many trials.

Will last week's astounding electoral sweep turn into something more lasting? In significant part, Democrats were able to win so many elections, in so many locales, because the sitting president  was making an undisguised fool of himself on a daily basis, every day, for the bulk of the past year.  

That helped Blue candidates flip red states. The sitting president may still be behaving that way by November 2028, but who knows what he may have decided to do before we could manage to get there?

French says Hegseth should be impeached. It's possible that he's right.


AMERICANA: Mississippi, no longer burning!

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2026

Then too, what happened in Florida: Will this unusual election year become a key part of the story? A key part of the evolving, imperfect American story?

A logger in Maine, a preacher in Kansas? An improbable giant-slayer in the former nation known as Texas? A pair of (lady) Democratic doctors flipping states believed to be red?

Will this year become a part of American history? For obvious reasons, Scott Colom's win in Mississippi is generating headlines like these, as seen online today in the New York Times:

Scott Colom, a Democrat, Wins Mississippi Senate Seat in Historic Upset
Mr. Colom, a prosecutor, will be the first Black senator elected from Mississippi since the post-Civil War Reconstruction period.  

Even there, those headlines stress the fact of party offer the fact of race. Atop the front page of today's print editions, the pair of headlines flips the point of emphasis: 

Colom Attains A Major Upset In Mississippi 
Elected As Its First Black Senator Since 1800s 

As indeed he was, at the age of 43. But which is the more newsworthy part of this upset? His party or his "race?"

Candidate Colom came through for the win. A great deal of the pain of American history is centered in Deep South states like the state from which he's emerged.

That said, we were struck last night, watching reaction on cable news shows, by the numbers of young Black Mississippians expressing their ongoing dedication to the state they regard as their home. Colom himself, at the end of his victory speech, made it clear that he was there to serve "every Mississippian—the ones that voted for me, the ones that didn't vote for me, and the ones that didn't vote."   

"Mississippi matters," he said. He didn't sound like someone who saw himself as part of a winning tribe.

There were "firsts" all over the electoral map this year. In fact, there were so many that many such "firsts" have attracted barely a word of notice. We think, for example, David Crowley, governor-elect of Wisconsin, and of Debra Haaland, governor-elect of New Mexico. 

Crowley and Haaland are both firsts, but in the flood of other such firsts, that fact has received little notice. For the record, Governor-elect Crowley will be the first Black governor of his state. Governor-elect Haaland will be the first Native American woman governor of any American state—and so on from there.

There were many firsts this year. That said, is the age of firsts perhaps reaching its end? Will that be a part of this year's story—a part of the evolving American story?

"These are the days of miracle and wonder?"  (Paul Simon, Graceland album.) In a report last week for the New York Times, Jia Lynn Yang starts trying to puzzle it out:

NEWS ANALYSIS
They Made History as ‘Firsts.’ That’s Not What They Ran On.  

The first Muslim senator. The first Black woman to be elected governor of any state. The first openly gay male senator. The first Black governor of Florida. The first elected Hispanic governors in Texas and in California.

The number of “firsts” achieved on Tuesday’s elections was extraordinary. Barriers came crashing down across the country. And yet during the campaigns, the candidates themselves hardly uttered a word about being on the precipice of history. There were no exhortations to vote for a particular person because “representation matters.”

Instead, most of them spoke relentlessly about household finances that had become impossible to manage, an unpopular war and corruption. They did not—and could not—hide their identities. But these facts were not central to their pitches to voters.

This is a major shift in the politics of identity...  

Yang goes on in somewhat jumbled fashion from there, suggesting that we live in a new and different America: Even as the sitting president "has continued insulting entire racial and ethnic groups," Yang says that Democratic candidates "have downplayed identity" in the course of this year's campaigns.   

It seems to us that Yang is hearing something which is actually there. She closes with a possible explanation for what she believes she has heard:    

[I]n a way, the long-awaited demographic turnover finally arrived in American politics this week. The slate of winners broke so many barriers in part because the country itself has become far more diverse. Since opening up to immigrants from around the world in the second half of the 20th century, the country is now generations deep into a whole new demographic reality.

Baby Boomers, who have long dominated the country’s political scene, are about 70 percent white. Millennials are around half. Gen-Z is more ethnically and racially diverse than any generation in American history. People like Mr. El-Sayed (42 years old), Sen. Jon Ossoff in Georgia (39) and James Talarico in Texas (37) have simply grown up in a different country.

The story this week, then, is not only about racial or gender demographics. It’s about the arrival of a new generation. For these Americans, diversity is not a campaign slogan. It’s a simple fact of life.    

In this portrait, America is moving away from "identity." Increasingly, talent is understood to emerge from every part of this sprawling, demographically complex nation, from every identifiable group.  

Increasingly, voters understand this fact. Increasingly, nobody cares about which group a talented candidate hails from.

Inevitably, some firsts are still more noteworthy than others. Colom's first in Mississippi is a difficult first to ignore. Last night, he promised to carry his whole state into its future, not just members of his own political or racial group.

That said, another first should perhaps be hard to ignore—and Yang mentions it in her opening paragraph.  We refer to her citation of "the first Black governor of Florida." 

We wouldn't have voted for him ourselves, but a lot of Republicans did. We think his election helps flesh out an American story we Blues have unwisely ignored.

Tomorrow: What Paul Thurmond said