MONDAY: Has anyone ever explained that flight?

MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 2026

Ossoff gets it right: Has anyone ever explained the tolling of the bell which seemed to occur when President Trump snuck off one plane out of Turkey, finding his way to another?   

Was actual danger involved? If not, why did the president subject himself to potential ridicule by sneaking away on a catering truck? 

If so, what the bell explains the trio of apparently minor aides who accompanied him on his flight, with Rubio, Bessent and Miller all left on the doomed jetliner. along with much of the press? 

Speaking of the press, has anyone ever tried to explain the call of the roll on those flights? Hegseth yes, Rubio no? What was up with that?

At any rate, executive assistant Natalie Harp was one of the intended survivors. According to the Wall Street Journal, Harp "plays an integral role in Trump’s Truth Social activity." She frequently "logs onto the president’s account—at times outside of normal work hours—and posts batches of Trump-approved messages," the Journal reported in May

Yesterday, Jon OssoffFox has him up by 13 in Georgiaelectrified Blue America with an angry insinuation about the president and Harp. 

For an initial report by Mediaite, you can just click here. We'll suggest that you look at the videotape of Ossoff's remarks. As shown, his angry presentation starts like this:

OSSOFF (8/16/26): There's something uniquely despicable about lying a nation into war. Treating citizens as fools, and those who serve as pawns.

Aboard the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln, they've now been at sea for 240-plus days without a port call. It's a Navy record. And still—and still

And still, they serve with excellence. 

And still, they serve with excellence! God bless the sailors, Marines, aviators and all aboard the United States Ship Abraham Lincoln. 

AUDIENCE: Cheers 

His insinuation came after that. We're not saying it was wrong.   

But first, he remembered to praise the men and women who serve. He had us as a very major force right there, when he (very convincingly) did that.

A favorite quote: A favorite quote from My Antonia:

"Ain't it wonderful, Jim, how much people can mean to each other?"


CRAZY/NOT SO BEAUTIFUL: There the president went again!

MONDAY, AUGUST 17, 2026

On horseback with General Washington: By now, it's a regular weekend event, and who really knows? It may be intended to draw attention away from everything else!

At any rate, there the president(s) went again! On Truth Social, you could see our nation's father(s) on horseback:

Trump Rides Horses With George Washington and Floats Big 2028 ‘Win’ in AI Posting Spree

President Donald Trump went on a bit of a posting spree on Saturday afternoon, with the flurry including the president posting multiple AI pictures of himself alongside George Washington. Trump also trotted out one of his go-to troll moves by hinting he will win the 2028 election—a claim which his liberal critics loathe and often point out can’t happen because of the Constitution.

The report by Sean James continues from there, with a trio of pictures included. One picture shows the sitting president back in the saddle again, riding next to General Washington.

This has become standard weekend fare. Who knows? It may be intended to draw attention away from headlines like this headline concerning the latest crazy presidential conduct concerning a major policy issue:

GOP Senator Absolutely Destroys Trump’s Recent Comments Casting Doubt on Vaccines: ‘That’s a Crazy, Stupid Thing!’

A Republican Senator is lashing out at President Donald Trump over his recent claim that “nothing bad can happen” by splitting up the childhood vaccine schedule.

Appearing on CNN’s State of the Union Sunday, Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) ripped the president for comments made during an executive order signing Tuesday in which he said he wants to split the MMR measles, mumps and rubella vaccine into separate shots. Despite vehement objections from top physician organizations, Trump falsely claimed the combined MMR shot could be “quite lethal,” and added that “separately, it looks like they are not at all lethal.”

[...]

“You’ve said someone needs to stand up to ‘crazy, stupid things’ being said that undermine faith and immunization,” Tapper told Cassidy. “Is President Trump saying some of these crazy stupid things?”

“Yeah,” Cassidy said. “That’s a crazy, stupid thing!”

Way back in 2001, Crazy/Beautiful was a generally well-regarded film about teen culture. This past week, we moved on to "Crazy/Stupid" in the realm of child health care as a pair of men with fairly obvious mental health issues pushed their peculiar beliefs and ludicrous claims on a rapidly failing nation.

It was "Crazy/Stupid," Cassidy said, finally finding his voice. Of course, he was hardly the first observer to express that general view.

Earlier in the week, the editorial board of the Washington Post had described Trump's claims about the MMR vaccine as "irresponsible, possibly deadly." Live and direct from Murdoch World, the editorial board at the Wall Street Journal had offered this:

Trump Jabs at Vaccines for Children

The U.S. is enduring its worst measles outbreak in years, but that isn’t stopping President Trump from spreading vaccine skepticism. He overruled his advisers, press reports say, by issuing Monday’s executive order urging Health and Human Services Secretary RFK Jr. to limit proven childhood immunizations.

The President’s declaration of “Gold Standard Childhood Vaccine Recommendations” largely follows a much-disputed HHS report in January that advised fewer vaccines on the childhood schedule. Mr. Trump likes to paint a golden sheen on everything, but his proposed regimen isn’t based on rigorous science, or really any science at all.

[...]

The order also proposes splitting the MMR into “three separate single-disease shots,” to be administered at separate medical visits. Mr. Trump claimed without evidence Monday that the MMR vaccine in its current form could be “quite lethal.” Is he trying to scare parents into not inoculating children?

And so on from there.

The New York Times has largely taken itself out of the editorial business. That said, the Times provided these punishing fact-check pieces:

Fact-Checking the Trump Administration’s Claims About Vaccines

President Trump signed an executive order on Monday calling for scaling back the number of vaccinations American children receive. At an Oval Office event announcing the order, Mr. Trump suggested falsely that vaccines were linked to autism and that the combined measles, mumps and rubella shot could be lethal, among other claims.

While it is not clear yet whether the order has any legal power, experts said they were concerned that the statements from Mr. Trump, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and others at the event would sow further doubt and confusion about the safety of immunizations. 
(For full report, click here.)

Should the M.M.R. Vaccine Be Split Into Three Separate Shots?

[...]

In an Oval Office signing ceremony, the president made a frightening and unsubstantiated claim about the combination shot. “Together, there could be a possibility they’re quite lethal.”

Researchers have not linked the combination M.M.R. shot to a risk of death, and there is no evidence that it is dangerous or that splitting it into its three components is any safer or more effective, vaccine experts said. Combination shots for the diseases have been used in the United States since 1971, and were introduced only after careful comparison against individual shots. They have been given to hundreds of millions of children.

What’s more, separate vaccines for measles, mumps or rubella have not been available in the United States for many years. Vaccine manufacturers said it would take a minimum of five to 10 years for them to be tested and made available.

[...]

“It’s just simply more confusion for the poor parents,” Dr. Edwards said. “And it’s just showing the world that our health system and our H.H.S. and our president are totally uninformed,” she said, referring to the Department of Health and Human Services.   
(For full report, click this.)   

We don't like to use the word "stupid" here. That said, how "Crazy/Not So Beautiful" were the Trump/Kennedy remarks?

Major news orgs don't like to report the astonishing size of the president's apparent mental / cognitive disorder. You may have to go to a site like Mediaite to get a report like this:

Trump Compares Common Vaccine to a Nuclear Weapon

President Donald Trump compared the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine to a nuclear bomb being set off inside a kid’s body during a Tuesday interview on Real America’s Voice.

The president championed the new childhood vaccine guidelines he and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. debuted Monday, with Trump claiming the old schedule was “too big” and “too much” at one time. He then talked about the MMR vaccine.

“If you give them separately — the M, the M, and the R, it’s fine,” Trump said. “When you put them together, they’re sort of like a nuclear weapon, according to some. So why wouldn’t you give them separately? What’s hurt by giving them separately?”

 [...]

Trump told Root the government had previously recommended “pumping this massive amount of fluid” into kids which looked “like a Coca-Cola bottle.”

“I don’t care if it’s water, it’s too much,” Trump said. 

According to the sitting president, an amount of vaccine "like a Coca-Cola bottle" is currently being pumped into each child's arm. The shots are "sort of like a nuclear weapon," he added. 

What was the source for these remarkable claims? What else? His source was "according to some!"

The lunacy of the president's claims might almost seem to suggest the possibility of a major cognitive problem. In our view, a different set of mental disorders is put on display by the major news orgs which still refuse to report and discuss the obvious fact that something seems to be wrong with this manwith a man who will remain in office, surrounded by his nut-ball staff, for more than two years even after the mid-term elections.

Is something wrong with President Trump? It's pretty much as you like it! Speaking on Long Island on Friday, there he (not so beautifully) went again:

Trump Boasts ‘Young Beautiful Girls’ Come to White House to Thank Him for Lowering Crime

President Donald Trump repeatedly boasted Friday that “young beautiful girls” have been showing up at the White House to thank him for lowering crime.

The cringeworthy comment came as Trump spoke to law enforcement officials on Long Island while touting his administration’s crime record...   

[...]

“These young, beautiful girls, these young, beautiful girls, these young, beautiful girls in the White House,” the president repeated. “You know, they come in. Now, I’m not supposed to say ‘beautiful,’ but what the hell?

“These young, these gorgeous, beautiful girls, they’re young. They wanna be safe, and they come, ‘Mr. President, may I speak to you?'”

“Yes,” Trump said, referring to how he responds to these “young beautiful girls.”

“Thank you, sir! Thank you!” the president recalls them saying. “I said, ‘Why are you thanking me?’ ‘Because a year and a half ago, I was afraid to leave—I was afraid to open the door of my apartment, and now I walk to the White House every morning, and I have absolutely no— Thank you, sir!'” 

There the president (not so beautifully) seems to have gone again! Is it possible that something's wrong with this rather powerful guy? 

At this point, we're barely scratching the surface here of the points of concern which may get swept away by AI pictures of the commander in chief riding along, on a charger, next to General Washington. But, for whatever reason, our major orgs in Blue America are going to duck the question of mental illness / cognitive decline "until the last dog dies."

That said, Blue America is also struggling as we start our week of reports. 

"Woke One was crazy," AOC said. What could she have meant by that?  

Tomorrow: We've wondered about this ourselves


SATURDAY: Dems are leading in six states!

SATURDAY, AUGUST 15, 2026

In search of the real Suzanne Scott: In yesterday afternoon's report, we noted the fact that Candidate El-Sayed is behind by four points in Michigan, according to a new survey by the Fox News polling unit.

Sherrod Brown is ahead by eight in Ohio, we noted, also according to Fox.

We're concerned about Michigan, where "prickly" is unlikely to win (or so it seems to us). That said, we thought you should hear the rest of the story, at least as told by Jessica Tarlov yesterday on The Five.   

Her presentation starts here. After saying that El-Sayed will be hurt by his association with Hasan Piker, she went ahead and said this:   

TARLOV (8/14/26): [El-Sayed] is trailing Mike Rogers by four points. And I understand why Republicans want to look to that facet of the Fox poll, because everything else is a disaster for Republicans, except the Michigan race. 

You have Ossoff up 13, Cooper up 9, Brown up 8, Turek up 4, Talarico up 3, and Jackson up 2, and then El-Sayed trailing by 4, so there is definitely work to do.    

So Tarlov said. She was referring to Democratic Party leads by these Senate candidates in these six states, according to Fox polls:  

Jon Ossoff in Georgia (+13) 
Roy Cooper in North Carolina (+9)
Sherrod Brown in Ohio (+8)
Josh Turek in Iowa (+4)
James Talarico in Texas (+3)
Troy Jackson in Maine (+2)  

Is that a disaster for Republicans? Not necessarily, no. 

Will those leads hold up in the end? We have no idea. 

That said, our nation is in a world of extremely serious hurt, and Blue America's largest news orgs (and best-known journalists) just keep playing it safejust keep averting their gaze.  

For reasons too depressing to state, we don't think a "prickly" approach will work for Candidate El-Sayed. With respect to life at the bottom of the barrel, consider the way El-Sayed is being portrayed by the droogs of the Fox News Channel as our Blue stars look away.

Gutfeld! is the third most-watched program in American "cable news." Its viewership more than doubles that of corresponding shows on MS NOW, with CNN's viewership lagging behind even that.  

Gutfeld! is a corporate messaging vehicle being misidentified as a "late night comedy" program. (It airs at 7 p.m. in the west!) Last night, in his handful of opening jokes, its host hit these favorite themes:   

Rosie O'Donnell is too fat
Michelle Obama is too big and too strong  
Something's wrong with Nancy Pelosi's face   
Hillary Clinton likes to kill people 

A certain pattern may seem to obtain. Along the way, he included this messaging moment with respect to El-Sayed: 

GUTFELD (8/14/26): You know, the Internet was amused over Abdul El-Sayed's Blue's Clues parody video. 

[Brief excerpt from El-Sayed video] 

Except the part where he stones Dora the Explorer to death for traveling alone.  

AUDIENCE: [General puzzlement]   

(Blue's Clues? What's that? Just click here.)

Understandably, the audience seemed a bit bewildered by that rather obscure presentation. That said, this was meant to deliver the message that El-Sayed is a violent "Muslim extremist" who would stone a little girl to death if she dared to venture out alone. 

This sort of sickness is now standard fare on this inexcusable "cable news" program. As people like Jeff Greenfield refuse to notice, the program's host is constantly suggesting that, just as Hillary Clinton likes to kill people, Mayor Mamdani and Candidate El-Sayed like to fly planes into the side of buildings or, in this particular case, are inclined to stone people to death.

This is ugly, prehistoric fare. CEO Suzanne Scott is now paying this man to do this sort of thing on a nightly basis. 

None of Blue America's news orgs are willing to report the fact that Suzanne Scott is doing this. No one is willing to ask her why she would do such a thing. 

This is ugly behavior of an undisguised, unmistakable kind. As our nation continues to slide toward the sea, the point of this conduct is obvious.

The point of this ugly conduct is obvious. Maddow and French and all the stars are all averting their gaze.


FRIDAY: Like every poll, it's only one poll!

FRIDAY, AUGUST 14, 2026

But here's what this one poll says: As with any poll, it's just one poll. Still, here's what this new poll has said:  

...New Fox News Poll Sounds Alarm Bells In Michigan For Democrats   

A new set of Fox News polls set of alarm bells for Democrats in Michigan’s key Senate race this week, while also highlighting how Republicans could lose their majority in the chamber.

“Tonight we have the first look at new Fox polling. The battle for Senate control in the midterms is leading to nationwide attention on really only a handful of races across the country that could decide the balance of power next year. Of course, Fox’s Alexis McAdams is in New York with a look at the new numbers. Good evening, Alexis,” began Fox’s chief political anchor Bret Baier on Thursday night.

“Bret, good evening. So, according to a brand new Fox News poll, Republicans have a slight edge in Michigan, in one of the most expensive and competitive Senate races in the country. So tonight, Republican Mike Rogers has 51 percent of the vote, and far-left Democrat Abdul El-Sayed has 47 percent. So Rogers has a four-point edge, which is still within the poll’s margin of error among Michigan’s registered voters,” McAdams reported.  

Oof! That four-point lead for Candidate Rogers suggests only "a slight edge," McAdams politely (and correctly) reported. Still, Democrats pretty much need to win that seatand this morning, we ourselves said this:   

"[Candidate El-Sayed] delivered a prickly response to the president's ugly insults. Assuming he wants to win in November, that struck us as possibly the wrong way to go, though of course there's no way to be certain."   

We Blues! Why would a prickly response possibly be the wrong way to go? The wrong way to go if you're trying to win the seat, that is?   

You're asking an excellent questionthough for now, we must hurry off, with McAdams noting El-Sayed's prickly suggestion that he and Rogers should stage "a tackle football showdown." 

Every poll is only one poll, but we aren't thrilled with that one poll. That said, Candidate Brown is ahead by eight points in Ohio, McAdams also says. 

(Fox News polls have largely been respectable polls, down through the many long years.)


NEW ARRIVALS: The furious streamer came fighting back!

FRIDAY, AUGUST 14, 2026

We won't repost what he said: Judged by any normal standard, last week's "new arrival on the front" is no one's idea of a joke.   

That new arrival was Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic Party's Senate nominee in Michigan. There's a lot to look at, so here we go. Fellow citizens, just try to hang on:  

Abdul El-Sayed 

Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed (born October 31, 1984), known as Abdul El-Sayed, is an American politician and epidemiologist who is the Democratic nominee in the 2026 United States Senate election in Michigan.

A progressive Democrat, El-Sayed supports regulated capitalism, Medicare for All, ceasing US military funding to Israel, and abolishing ICE. He ran for governor in 2018, placing second to Gretchen Whitmer in the Democratic primary.

He served as the director of the Department of Health, Human, and Veterans Services of Wayne County from 2023 to 2025. From 2015 to 2017, he was the executive director of the City of Detroit Health Department, where he oversaw public health initiatives during the city’s recovery from bankruptcy. A graduate of the University of Michigan and a Rhodes Scholar at Oriel College, Oxford, El-Sayed holds a Doctor of Medicine from Columbia University, where he was an assistant professor of epidemiology.

That's where the leading authority starts. Continuing, that source also tells us this:  

El-Sayed was born in the Detroit suburb of Rochester Hills to Egyptian immigrant parents. His father, Mohamed, was raised in Alexandria, Egypt, and immigrated to the U.S. to pursue a PhD at Wayne State University. His mother, Fatten Elkomy, is a nurse practitioner in Missouri. Abdul was raised in the Detroit area by his father and stepmother Jacqueline (a native of Gratiot County, Michigan), both of whom are engineers.

El-Sayed graduated from Bloomfield Hills Andover High School, where he was a team captain for wrestling, football and lacrosse in 2003. He then attended the University of Michigan, where he majored in biology and political science...He graduated Phi Beta Kappa with Highest Distinction in 2007 with a bachelor's degree and delivered that year's commencement speech.  

[...]   

As a second-year medical student, he received a Rhodes Scholarship to attend Oriel College, Oxford, where he completed a D.Phil. in public health in 2011. In 2014, he completed a Doctor of Medicine (M.D.) degree at the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons...El-Sayed did not pursue a medical license and instead went into public health epidemiology work.

There once was a time when a resume of that type might inspire grudging respect. In the madness of the present day, El-Sayed's win last week produced ugly pushback from President Trump, along with a flurry of commentary on the Fox News Channel in which the children complained that he refers to himself as a "physician" when he should really just say he's a "doctor."   

(No, we aren't making that up.)

Will Candidate El-Sayed win November's general election? We have no idea. 

He delivered a prickly response to the president's ugly insults. Assuming he wants to win in November, that struck us as possibly the wrong way to go, though of course there's no way to be certain. 

And then there's the fact he has campaigned with Hasan Piker, another of this year's "new arrivals." The nominee has even suggested that he might do so again. 

Would that tilt the vote more Red or more Blue? Would it change any votes at all?

We can't actually tell you that! We can say that Piker arrives on the front with a rather high profile, in part for reasons the leading authority summarizes here:   

Hasan Piker   

Hasan Doğan Piker (born July 25, 1991) is an American Twitch streamer, influencer, and left-wing political commentator. His livestreams usually include discussions on current affairs and lifestyle stories, playing video games, reacting to memes and media clips, and interacting with his viewers.

As of 2026, Piker's Twitch channel ranks among the platform's most-subscribed. Piker has been called one of the biggest voices on the American Left...He has regularly spoken about the Gaza war, advocating for Palestinians and criticizing the Israeli government. 

[...] 

In May 2024, Piker described allegations of Hamas carrying out sexual violence during the October 7 attacks as "rape fantasies" and "rape hallucinations." Piker has also said, "It doesn't matter if rape happened on October 7th. It doesn't change the dynamic for me." 

In an April 2026 interview with The New Republic, Piker said of the quotation: "I think it's very clear what I was saying. I was debating someone at the time about there being sexual violence that occurred on October 7th. And I said sexual violence does take place in situations like this, and there was definitely testimony of sexual violence that had taken place amongst the hostages. But that doesn't change the dynamic of Israel committing a genocide against the Palestinians, and my opposing that genocide."

And so on from there, at substantial length, as you can see for yourself. Now for the rest of the story:

This Monday, Joe Scarborough voiced concern about the possibility that Democrats might be snatching election defeat from the jaws of victory at the present time. At Mediaite, David Gilmour presented a lengthy account of Scarborough's "fiery, must-watch rant." 

Gilmour presented transcript and tape of the "fiery rant." You can just click here

At that time, it still seemed likely that new arrival Francesca Hong was going to win in Wisconsin. In Scarborough's view, mainstream Democrats were failing to separate themselves from the less presentable views of such DSA / lefty types. 

As we showed you yesterday, Scarborough eventually said what you see below. Though he never said his name, he was plainly referring to Piker in this part of his fiery plea:

SCARBOROUGH (8/10/26): There's nothing wrong with the Democrats supporting economic justice. There's nothing wrong with the Democrats supporting...getting rid of the Trump taxes and making billionaires pay more in taxes. 

That’s a legitimate mainstream debate for people to have. "Healthcare for all! Healthcare is unaffordable!" That is something most Americans would agree with. 

But please, I don’t need people telling me, "Oh, you have to just turn a blind eye to people saying that women getting raped on October 7 didn’t matter in the grand scheme of things." No, Americans aren’t going to support that!   

Plainly, he was referring to Piker's famous statement about October 7. Later that day, Piker came pushing back, going on and on, at endless length, in a way we won't repost or transcribe.   

You can read what Piker said by clicking for Gilmour's follow-up report. Also, you can listen to what Piker said by clicking that link. 

(In our view, a fair amount of what Piker said that day was inaccurate.)

According to the leading authority, Piker seems to have become relatively wealthy providing content of that general type. "In 2021, he bought a $2.7 million house in West Hollywood," the leading authority says.

People also get wealthy on the Fox News Channel! But can the American project, such as it has been, really expect to survive a discourse of this type?   

The so-called "democratization of media" has created a new way of life. With apologies to Huey Long, our nation now runs on this rocket fuel:   

Every streamer a king!

To borrow from the early Dylan, in one of his most painful songs:   

But oh, what kind of democratization is this, which goes from bad to worse?

More on the composition: Yes, the song is called Tears of Rage. In the present day, our culture is running on the rage, perhaps in the absence of tears.