SURROUNDINGS: Wilma Rudloph won the hundred!

SATURDAY, MARCH 7, 2026

Let's call the whole thing off: According to the leading authority on the practice, the practice started like this:

State of the Union 

The State of the Union address is an annual message delivered by the president of the United States to a joint session of the United States Congress near the beginning of most calendar years on the current condition of the nation. The speech generally includes reports on the nation's budget, economy, news, agenda, progress, achievements and the president's priorities and legislative proposals.

The address fulfills the requirement in Article II, Section 3, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution that the president "shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient." During most of the country's first century, the president primarily submitted only a written report to Congress. After 1913, Woodrow Wilson, the 28th U.S. president, began the regular practice of delivering the address to Congress in person as a way to rally support for the president's agenda, while also submitting a more detailed report. With the advent of radio and television, the address is now broadcast live in all United States time zones on many networks.

The speech is generally held in January or February, and an invitation to the president is extended to use the chamber of the House by the speaker of the House.

[...]

Because the address is made to a joint session of Congress, the House and Senate must each pass a resolution setting a date and time for the joint session. Then, a formal invitation is made by the speaker of the House to the president typically several weeks before the appointed date.

The practice dates to 1913. By tradition, an invitation is extended to the president. 

The president is invited to come to the House. He's invited to deliver a speech to members of the House and the Senate.

This year, the war in Iran was three days away as the president spoke. Moments after he began his address, he brought in the men's hockey team.

What follows isn't a comment on the men's hockey team, which had recently vanquished Canada. 

With respect to the players on that hockey team, we'll assume that they're good, decent people, though possibly still a bit short of perfect. We think of the words from the Hank Williams song:

I was just a lad, nearly twenty-two.
Neither good nor bad
just a kid like you.

Did Williams actually write those lyrics? The leading authority says no. To us, they're deeply insightful, sacred wordsbut, at any rate, this:

The president called the players in, as was apparently part of his right under terms of his invitation.

It wasn't the worst thing he could have done. But by the time the evening was done, Peggy NoonanPresident Reagan's brilliant speechwriterwas discovered to have written this for the Wall Street Journal:

The Oprah State of the Union 

The president’s State of the Union address came straight from the heart of Crazytown. It had everything—tears, cheers, spectacle. They handed out medals and honors like Oprah in the early 2000s: “You get a car! Everybody gets a car!” At one point I thought he was going to pull out a ceremonial sword and knight Kristi Noem. There was yelling and booing and people crying, it was big and rousing, boring and absurd. And important in some things it revealed.

Ten years in, and Democrats still don’t know how to handle Donald Trump. He used them as foils and they allowed it, sitting there snarling, at points screaming. Part of how to handle him is if he tries to manipulate you into doing the right thing—if, for instance, he challenges you to stand in respect for a mother mourning the murder of her daughter—you put aside that you’re being manipulated and stand. Because it is right to show human sympathy and regard. The thing to do is look better than Mr. Trump, not worse. You say: My base demands coldness. Then get a new base. If you can’t, leave before you are reduced to a soulless husk of the eager, happy person who walked into that chamber a decade ago.

It had everything—tears, cheers, spectacle, awards. Democrats still haven’t figured Trump out.

When the gallery doors swung open and the triumphant U.S. Olympic men’s hockey team marched in, it was vulgar and fabulous. They were wearing their medals and their Ralph Lauren sweaters and smiling and laughing like good young men. We all think we’re above theatrics. Perhaps you had a moment like this: You were home on the couch and you saw the guys bounding in and thought, “I am sophisticated, I know what they’re doing, they’re manipulating me, but I’m not some rube, I’ll watch clinically. Oh Jeez, Jack Hughes’s tooth is still broken, God bless him. The goalie’s chewing gum like some 1945 GI.” And your throat hitched up against your will and your eyes moistened and when they started with “USA! USA!” you gave up, gave in, and pumped your fist. It is a damnable fact of life that great propaganda works even when you know it’s propaganda. 

Was it "vulgar" when the team came in? We wouldn't have used that word. 

Did the event come to us the people "straight from the heart of Crazytown?" That's tough language too!

We'd avoid blaming Oprah Winfrey for any of this. If she once gave away fleets of cars, that was her prerogative. Meanwhile, let it be said, perhaps in search of basic fairness, that President Trump has basically handled the southern border, while possibly making a giant mess of other parts of his spectacularly muddled MASS DEPORTATION versus "Worst of The Worst" presidential campaign brief. 

Noonan is a much better wordsmith than we are. That said, we almost might have gone with words like "bread and circuses"and that seems to be, in substantial part, akin to some of what Noonan said.

She also referred in that passage to the president's gotcha games that night, though not in those exact words. More on that topic below.

Based on what happened that Tuesday night, we'd say that the State of the Union event has possibly run its course. With all the medals and honors and spectacle and of course with all the theatrics, we'd have to say that it might be time to say this:

Let's call the whole thing off. 

A major war was three nights away. Perhaps in service to military strategy, that topic was barely mentioned.

Instead, we the people were asked to cheer the men's hockey team, which had recently defeated their Canadian teammatesin overtime, no less. Noonan, who's a good, decent person, seemed to say that she had reacted like this:

Despite her sophistication, her throat hitched up against her will and her eyes moistened, and when they started with “USA! USA!” she gave up and pumped her fist.

There's no reason why she shouldn't have reacted that waylarge numbers of people did. 

"Great propaganda works," she then said. There Noonan went again!

As we recently noted, we were lucky enough to have attended the so-called "Greatest Track Meet of All Time"the spectacular U.S. / Soviet Union meet in July 1962. It was held at Stanford Stadium, maybe ten miles from our family's front door 

We saw Bob Hayes win the men's 100. We saw Wilma Rudolph run away from the field in the corresponding women's event.

That event took place at the heart of the nuclear-tinged Cold War. Starting in the first grade, we kids had practiced hiding under our desks to defeat the possible bomb blast.

As the two-day meet took place, the Bay of Pigs had disastrously failed one year before. The so-called "Cuban Missile Crisis"more on that event belowwas now just three months off.

The U.S. men outpointed their Soviet rivals that weekend. The Soviet women won their half of the meet.

We saw Valery Brumel set a world record in the high jump. But the part of that meet which has lasted longest occurred when the athletic events were all done.

Many years later, Red Shannon chronicled the meet in fascinating detail for The Bleacher Report. We'll give you two bites of the apple:

USA vs. USSR, 1962: The Greatest Track Meet of All Time

[...]

While negotiations in Washington and Moscow intended to diffuse a ticking time bomb were falling apart, the few days in Palo Alto leading up to the competition were a demonstration of the very best humanity has to offer.

Private homes were opened up to the Soviets. Spontaneous cross-culture pickup games of basketball and baseball broke out in parking lots and streets. Host families organized informal tours of the many attractions in the San Francisco area. Banquets and press conferences were characterized by levity and mutual respect.

The charming Soviet world-record high jumper, Valery Brumel, entertained the press by doing his famous high-kick, touching a basketball rim with his toe, ten feet above ground.

Not one protest or demonstration marred the entire week.

On Saturday, July 21, 1962, 72,500 track fans filed through the gates of Stanford Stadium. The following day, another 81,000 filled the seats. It was the greatest two-day crowd to ever witness a non-Olympic track meet.

While the enthusiastic fans were indeed partisan, any superb effort was rewarded with cheers, regardless of nationality. The Americans were especially curious to get a look at Brumel and long jumper Igor Ter-ovanesyan who had recently eclipsed Ralph Boston's world record—and of course the famous Press sisters, Tamara and Irina.

In a manner typical of those days, the Americans dominated the sprints, middle distance, and pole vault. The Soviets ruled the longer distance races and jumping events.

The crowd got its money's worth. "Bullet" Bob Hayes, who went on to a second career with the Dallas Cowboys, won the men's 100 meters. His female counterpart, the great Wilma Rudolph, noted for her childhood battle with infantile paralysis, won the women's 100 meters and, through a gutsy anchor leg, secured a dramatic come-from-behind win in the 400-meter relay.

[...]

Perhaps the most symbolic and heart-gripping moment came as the athletes prepared to exit the stadium. The plan was to exit directly through the south end, in two columns. At the head of the columns, American [high jumper] John Thomas and Soviet javelinist Viktor Tsybulenko held a mini summit meeting of their own and decided instead to make a final victory lap.

All the athletes followed in unison, holding hands, embracing, waving their national colors. The fans stood and cheered as the entire formation of American and Soviet athletes completed their lap, then disappeared through the south gate.

The press would report that the American men won, 128-107 and the Soviet women prevailed, 66-41. No one really cared.

And no one wanted to leave. The Marine Corps Band continued to play for nearly an hour. Tears came easily for most of the record crowd as a cleansing torrent of emotion washed over them.

Ralph Boston would later recall, "I can't remember if the Cold War ever came into my mind at any time. All I was thinking was 'here was this super track and field team from the other side of the world...'"

In our view, the wordsmith Shannon got one word wrong. That wordsee abovewas "perhaps."

Citizen Shannon, please! Perhaps the most heart-gripping moment came as the athletes exited? 

We were physically present that day, and emotion swallowed the stadium as the athletes themselves, but surely the spectators, entertained thoughts of "something higher. Something more enduring," to return to Shannon's words.

The Soviet athletes joined in that long, slow farewell march. They circled the stadium, arm in arm with their American counterparts.

It wasn't the worst thing to see that occur. Three months later, the thirteen days of the Cuban missile crisis took place. 

We ourselves were just a lad, nearly 15a mere high school sophomore. One day, the spirited junior who would later be Aragon High's head cheerleader approached us and said these words:

"I'm afraid I won't get the chance to grow up."

If film existed of what she said, we think those might be her exact words. And of course, a lot of kids, this very day, don't get the chance to grow up.

Will our political culture ever grow up? The president has handled the southern border, but at that State of the Union event, he responded to his invitation to speak by playing the usual games. 

Noonan didn't use the word gotcha. We'll offer that word on our own.

Responding to an invitation, the president formed a gotcha game aimed at the chamber's Democrats. We'll spare you an extended discussion of his most vaunted gotcha game, but we will remind you of this:

Under terms of their oath to the Constitution, members have obligations to American citizens. But under terms of that same oath, they also have obligations to people who are "illegal immigrants"to people who are in the country without authorization. 

In theory, they're required to honor both sets of obligations. But the president, playing an increasingly familiar game, seemed to be working from this silly old football cheer that night:

Lean to the left, lean to the right.
Stand up, sit down
Fight fight fight!

Offered an invitation to speak, he responded by playing games with one set of his hosts. We're living in two (2) Americas now, and some of us seem to want to keep pushing farther on.

For ourselves, we didn't care all that much about that U.S. / Canada hockey match. We watched the third period and the overtime, but we didn't much care who won.

Other people very much didand there was no reason why they shouldn't have! Unless you were watching the agitprop on "cable news," there was also no reason why anyone should feel they had to.

We rooted for the Yanks at that 1962 track meet, but it ended with something larger. We were lucky that we got to attend. As the current war in Iran drew near, the gotcha game the president almost might perhaps have staged was part of the cultural surroundings.

We can still see Wilma Rudolph as she pulled away from the field. Also, we're still able to recall what that high school junior said.

FRIDAY: The scripting when Marimar Martinez was shot!

FRIDAY, MARCH 6, 2026

The lunacy, just for the record: How crazy can tribal warfare get? 

Just for the record, the answer can look like what you see below. It came from the DHS last October, when Marimar Martinez was shot. 

As a matter of fact, she was shot five times, by a Border Patrol agent. Eventually, it became clear that the account of what had happened from the agent who shot her was jaw-droppingly bogus. 

Recent language about "domestic terrorists" may have started here. It looks like DHS hired some writers from North Korea to come up with this account:

UPDATE: DHS Deploys Special Operations After Multiple Violent Attacks on Federal Law Enforcement by Domestic Terrorists in Chicago

Release Date: October 4, 2025

Three vehicles used as weapons against our brave law enforcement as they work without pay to make America safe again

WASHINGTON – This morning, Border Patrol law enforcement officers were ambushed by domestic terrorists that rammed federal agents with their vehicles. The woman, Marimar Martinez, driving one of the vehicles, was armed with a semi-automatic weapon and has a history of doxxing federal agents. She took defensive fire from CBP agents and has been discharged from the hospital and is currently in the custody of the FBI. The driver of another vehicle, Anthony Ian Santos Ruiz, involved in the ramming has been apprehended by law enforcement.

The scene became increasingly violent as more domestic terrorists gathered and began throwing smoke, gas, rocks, and bottles at DHS law enforcement. Another domestic terrorist was arrested for assaulting CBP at the scene. Following JB Prtizker’s refusal to allow local police to help secure the scene, Secretary Noem has deployed special operations teams to restore law and order.

As our ICE law enforcement was responding to the shooting, a domestic terrorist followed them and rammed their vehicle in an attempt to run them off the road. This individual has also been arrested and is in HSI custody.

An ICE vehicle popped a tire and was subsequently mobbed by domestic terrorists, forcing law enforcement to abandon the vehicle for their own safety. The vehicle was significantly damaged.

Several CBP law enforcement officers were sent to the hospital with various injuries.

Straight outta North Korean AI, the "domestic terrorists" were everywhere that day! Months later, that designation was instantly applied to Renee Good and Alex Pretti when they were fatally shot in Minneapolis.

DHS actually peddled that screeching account of what happened in Chicago last October. Eventually, it became clear that their basic account of the day's events had been jaw-droppingly wrong.

Also included in that dispatch was a "Statement from Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin." 

Your assignment, should you choose to accept it:

Never descend into hysteria of that remarkable type.

 

SURROUNDINGS: A detainee tried to eat his own arm!

FRIDAY, MARCH 6, 2026

She said it not once, but twice: It's been said that Plato wrote it, if only in translation:

"When I saw all this, and other things as bad, I was disgusted and withdrew from the wickedness of the times." 

As we've frequently noted, Plato is said to have written that in the Seventh Letter, which may or not be authentic. Having said that, also this:

The lunacy of the current times was on display this week as Secretary Noem was shown the door. Regarding Secretary Noem herself, we'll make these brief observations: 

Her refusal to Go Full Bondi: To her credit, she didn't Go Full Bondi during this week's congressional hearings. In fact, she didn't imitate Bondi at all. By possible way of contrast:

It's our impression that Senator Tillis (R-NC) is a good, decent person. But in his shouted inquisition about the way Noem once shot her puppy and also a goat, we thought he captured the craziness of the times during the first of the week's two hearings.

Of all the things Noem had done or had possibly done in office, he was shouting at her about that!

Insinuate, insinuate: In our view, Lawrence O'Donnell almost seemed to follow suit on Wednesday night's Last Word. On three separate occasions during the hour, he teased an upcoming discussion of a question he seemed quite eager to discussthe question of whether Secretary Noem and Corey Lewandoski have been engaged in a sexual relationship. 

He also offered an additional tease, this time (did he actually do it twice?) about "one of the most famous flying bedrooms since Jeffrey Epstein was grounded."

Just this once, we'll be honest. We don't especially care whether Noem and Lewandoski been so engaged. That said, after explicitly teasing Jeremy Raskin as the guest who would he discussing that topic, Lawrence never said a single word to Raskin about this thrilling question.

"Simplify, simplify," Thoreau once said. In the case of Lawrence's unfortunate outing, it was more like this:

"Insinuate, insinuate," especially about matters of sex. 

The collection of scholars on The Five have been playing this game in the past week with respect to the Clintons. Backsliding into one of his unhelpful daysthey've been very rare in recent yearsLawrence followed suit on Wednesday night. He was absent last night. 

Costuming issues: It's been said that it was the massive cost of the Mount Rushmore ads which helped seal Noem's fate. In that instance, Secretary Noem had decked herself out, in some of the shots, as a wild west buffalo driver.

For our money, her most egregious costuming decision involved the pose she struck before a crowded cell full of half-naked male prisoners in the early El Salvador days. 

As of this morning, the New York Times was still pretending that it was Noem's expensive watch which made those visuals so inappropriate. Do we Blues have any sexual politics at all? We're forced to suggest that, rather plainly, it was actually something else.

In search of "domestic terrorists:" We'll guess that it wasn't Noem who invented the mandated practice of referring to DHS shooting victims as "domestic terrorists." We'll guess that that rhetorical lunacy came from Stephen Miller, although that's merely a guess.

Last fall, when Marimar Martinez was shot five times in Chicago, she too was instantly called a "domestic terrorist," even way back then. That was long before Noem made herself famous by attaching that insane designation to Renee Good and Alex Pretti, the victims of fatal shootings in Minneapolis this year.

We'll guess that Noem was trying to stick to a pre-arranged messaging diktat. In the case of those fatal Minneapolis shootings, she instantly did so, in a way which took us toward the limits of previously known human dumbness.

The lunacy of the times has been on vivid display in these varied events. That general lunacy was part of the surroundings last week as we the people were moving toward our ongoing war in Iran.

We don't know how that war will turn out; we can imagine it flat or round. That said, the most puzzling episode in Noem's term was revisited a few weeks back.

They picked it up at Mediate. We saw it reported nowhere else. The lunacy of the times is lurking here. Michael Luciano's report started off like this:

Trump Official Disputes Kristi Noem’s Claim About ‘Cannibal’ Who ‘Tried to Eat Himself’ While in Custody 

A wild tale about an undocumented immigrant told by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem “is completely false,” a senior federal law enforcement official told The Intercept for a story published on Monday.

Back in June, Noem went on Fox News and claimed that a U.S. marshal told her about a particularly bizarre deportation flight.

“I was talking to a U.S. marshal just yesterday, and he was talking about deporting a plane load of illegals, and one of them was a cannibal,” she said at the time. “He started to eat his own arms. He was such a deranged individual. This is the kind of people President Trump is getting off our streets.”

It's true! Inexplicably, Noem repeated that extremely strange tale during an appearance on Jesse Watters Primetime. How odd was her second-hand story about the cannibal who tried to eat his own arm, presumably as a means of escape? 

It was so odd that it even seemed to give Watters pause!

What could explain the fact that a major federal official had gone on the nation's second most-watched "cable news" show and had repeated this "wild tale"had seemed to believe that this crazy tale actually seemed to make some sort of sense?

We don't know how to answer that questionbut a few days later, Noem repeated the same story with the president at her side. She did so at the high-profile, televised unveiling of the infamous "Alligator Alcatraz" detention site in the Florida Everglades.

A detainee had tried to eat his own arm, presumably as a means of escape! In what world does a major official repeat such a lunatic taleand not just on one occasion, but in two major settings? 

What can possibly explain the fact that Secretary Noem did that?

We reported those bizarre remarks by Noem in real time, when the remarks were made. In another peculiar sign of the times, the major news orgs of Blue America yawned and looked away. 

A cannibal tried to eat his own arm! She said it not once, but twice!

In conclusion, we'll offer this:

Kristi Noem has to be better than this. We hope she ends up showing it. 

Also, we don't believe in piling on people at times like thesefor example, by nosing around about their sexual behavior. The lunacy of the current time really does start at the topand for the record, we've long suggested that you should pity the child who became that powerful, dangerous man.

We've repeatedly praised O'Donnell of late. On Wednesday, we'd say he briefly crashed and burned, along with one or two guests.


THURSDAY: Sexuality has always been hard!

THURSDAY, MARCH 5, 2026

But why is he still on the air? It's been hard to chronicle all the surroundingsall the phenomena in the air last week in the run-up to our struggling nation's latest war.

The most difficult such undertaking involves the moral and intellectual squalor which characterizes such "cable news" programs as Gutfeld! and The Five. That's especially true of the throwback sexual politics which dominates those two propaganda messaging shows. 

Sexuality has always been hard! That said, rebellion against the feminism of the past sixty years is especially powerful on those imitation "news" programs. Last Thursday night, that produced the state of affairs in which millions of viewers were subjected to the moral squalor of watching Greg Gutfeld offer this "joke," as we noted this morning:

GUTFELD (2/26/26): Rosie O'Donnell's daughter Chelsea has been accused of assault after touching a man's genitals. 

Apparently, she never learned boundaries growing up watching farmers milk her mom.

The program started at 10 o'clock; he offered that at 10:01. We've always advised you to "pity the child" when you see a 61-year-old person screaming for help, but we offer a superseding question:

Why is that man on the air?

Regarding the blowhard tub of lard who performs on these shows as "Tyrus," we floated a certain suggestion this morning. We'll repost our suggestion in the form of a question:

Yesterday, as he played the fool with respect to the Clintons' depositions, did he mistakenly think that the Clintons had sat for a single joint deposition?

After watching him play the fool on The Five and then on Gutfeld!, that's the way it seemed to us. Now for the rest of the (possible) story:

After posting this morning's report, we read a new essay by Monica Hesse in the Washington Post. When we did, we wondered if we suddenly understood where "Tyrus" might have acquired that misimpression.

Headline included, Hesse's column starts as shown. As she mocks the latest foofaw from the House Oversight Committee, she includes the dumbbell videotape which might well prove misleading to an underinformed observer:

Now streaming! The Clinton depositions were the week’s best new drama.

This week on Season 250 of “America,” the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform offered up the testimonies of a former president and a former secretary of state in the manner of a broadcast network unveiling a new midseason procedural drama.

“EXCLUSIVE,” read the post on X. “Watch the depositions of President Bill Clinton and Secretary Hillary Clinton in front of the House Oversight Committee as part of our investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.”

A 21-second trailer followed: In split-screen, two of your favorite recurring characters—who happen to be married to each other—were each shown sitting at a conference table as an offscreen voice instructed, “Can the court reporter please swear in the witness?” The Clintons’ heads turned, they raised their right hands, and they swore to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth: “I do.”

At that point, Hesse inserted the "21-second trailer" the Oversight Committee had posted. You can watch that 21 seconds of videotape simply by clicking here

Our question:

Did a certain "cable news" blowhard get fooled by that 21 seconds of tape?

It looks like the Clintons were there together! Is that what the big blowhard thought?

Sexuality has always been hard, dating all the way back to events in a famous garden. On The Five, but also on Jesse Watters Primetime and on the Gutfeld! program, Watters, Gutfeld and "Tyrus" seem to display a deep desire to return gender norms and expectations to a rather moldy old format.

These fellows seem to want to be in charge in the manner to which they seem to feel accustomed. Especially on Gutfeld!, this leads to endless ugly insults aimed at liberal women by the star of that braindead show. 

We refer to the relentless purveyor of sexual insult who offered this last week:

GUTFELD (2/26/26): Rosie O'Donnell's daughter Chelsea has been accused of assault after touching a man's genitals.

Apparently, she never learned boundaries growing up watching farmers milk her mom.

At Fox, they open this garbage can every night and a tortured person comes slithering out. In Blue America, journalistic and academic elites have all agreed not to notice.

(In fairness, we've reminded you to "pity the child"to pity the fellow who has possibly had a hard time keeping up with basic rules of decency and respect.) 

Greg Gutfeld could do much better! Having said that, we'll also say this:

Why in the worldwhy on earthis he still on the air?

Sadly, also this: In our view, the bulk of Lawrence's O'Donnell's program was weirdly dismaying last night. 

At present, our society seems to be coming apart. On some other disordered day, we'll provide the details.


SURROUNDINGS: Farmers had milked her mom like a cow!

THURSDAY, MARCH 5, 2026

Watters and Gutfeld go off: Three nights before the war began, the State of the Union event was held. 

On this occasion, we wouldn't necessarily describe it as an "address." Over at the Wall Street Journal, Peggy Noonan didn't seem to care for the foolishness either. 

Headline included, her column started like this:

The Oprah State of the Union

The president’s State of the Union address came straight from the heart of Crazytown. It had everything—tears, cheers, spectacle. They handed out medals and honors like Oprah in the early 2000s: “You get a car! Everybody gets a car!” At one point I thought he was going to pull out a ceremonial sword and knight Kristi Noem. There was yelling and booing and people crying, it was big and rousing, boring and absurd. And important in some things it revealed.

Ten years in, and Democrats still don’t know how to handle Donald Trump. He used them as foils and they allowed it...

Noonan continued from there. 

We don't agree with every word Noonan said. We don't even agree, in every way, with what she said about (our view) the sheer stupidity involved in bringing the men's hockey team in from the cold that night. 

(Noonan: "When the gallery doors swung open and the triumphant U.S. Olympic men’s hockey team marched in, it was vulgar and fabulous.")

We don't agree with everything Noonan said about this "Crazytown" event. But the State of the Union was part of the surroundings as the move against Iran drew near. 

In our view, the sheer stupidity of our devolving political culture was on display that night. That event was part of the surroundings as the move on Iran drew nearbut so was the delicious two-day event up north, the Chappaqua depositions. 

Dearest darlings, it was delicious! On Thursday and Friday of last weeklate that night, the move on Iran would beginthe pair of Clintons would be deposed about a pair of sexual felons. 

Hillary Clinton would be deposed on Thursday; her husband would be deposed the following day. On The Five, the mutts were well pleasedand yes, the braindead behavior of Fox News Channel "cable news" shows was also part of the surroundings as the start of this war drew near. 

How will this war turn out? Left to our own soothsaying, we have no way to tell you. 

We've seen people who plainly aren't nuts voice approval of the undertaking. (General Clark, come on down!) But on the nation's most-watched "cable news" show, the mutts weren't trying to produce a framework of understanding about the situation in Iran or about anything else. 

Instead, the mugging and clowning about the depositions got started. On Thursday afternoonone day away from warthe children on our most-watched "cable news" program had some excellent fun with Hillary Clinton's deposition, concerning which little was actually known at that point. 

The children people our most-watched showbut oh, what kind of cultural madness is this? After an utterly pointless pseudo-discussion, one of the culture's leading mutts closed the segment about Thursday's deposition by scrambling to work this in:

PERINO (2/26/26): All right. Jesse, last word?

WATTERS: This was just the appetizer. Bill's tomorrow, and that's where it's at. 

He was on the plane. He may have been on the island. And there's an allegation that he had an affair with Ghislaine Maxwell. So let's just hope they have their stories straight.

PERINO: All right. Well, that will wrap us on The Five...That's it for us. 

He rushed to include the "allegation." There's an allegation, the simpleton saidthe simpleton who also serves as a propaganda messaging agent for the corporation which owns him. 

So it went as the nation's most-watched imitation of life went off the air that day. As of yesterday, the various mutts were still having their fun with last week's depositions, though it seemed fairly obvious that the biggest dumbass of them all had exactly zero idea what he was talking about.

By yesterday, the former "wrestler" who performs as "Tyrus" had had six days to get straight about these depositions. At the invaluable Rev, you can read the transcript of the million things Bill Clinton said, even including this:

QUESTION (2/27/26): Can you briefly, for the record, describe the nature and extent of your relationship with Ms. Maxwell?

CLINTON: Yes. It lasted longer and was more extensive than my relationship with Mr. Epstein, because Ghislaine Maxwell started going with a man named Ted Waitt, who had made a lot of money making the first sort of self-designed computers, and he was a big supporter of mine and the Clinton Foundation before he started seeing Ghislaine. 

We had been friends, and he was interested in particular in reducing pollution in the oceans. And so when she started going with him, I would see her from time to time.

QUESTION: And when did your relationship with Ms. Maxwell end?

CLINTON: I don't think I've seen her in a decade. It's been a long time. I don't know exactly when.

[...]

QUESTION: Do you have any recollection of what year it would've ended?

CLINTON: No, but when she was with Ted Waitt, she was— When we were kicking off [the Clinton Global Initiative], she was very interested in that and she participated, but I don't rememberI don't know. It's been ten, twelve years since I saw her. I don't remember when the last time was.

There's much more if you're interested. As best we can tell, he wasn't asked about the "allegation" with which Watters had managed to close the previous day's pathetic imitation of life. 

As for the former "wrestler," let the word go forth to the nations! Yesterday, he was presented to the world two times, first on The Five and then, five hours later, on Gutfeld! 

Uh-oh! During his smirking filibuster on The Five, it almost seemed he thought that the two Clintons had been present at the same time for a joint deposition. During his smirking on the Gutfeld! show, it seemed clear that that's what this big blowhard thought. 

It was all tied to his flyweight rumination about why Hillary Clinton became angry at one point during Thursday's event. All in all, it couldn't have been much dumber, though he may be willing to try.

That said, the misogyny-adjacent behavior is endless on these "cable news" shows. So it goes when Fox lets the dogs out each night, with every news org in Blue America agreeing to avert its gaze.

The sheer stupidity of these programs is their primary calling card. But especially on the Gutfeld! show, the truly astonishing ugliness also comes rushing in.

That ugly conduct was part of the surroundings last week as we approached our current war. Consider what that program's host said on last Thursday's program.

With apologies, a bit of background is required:

Unfortunately, Rosie O'Donnell's adult daughter, Chelsea O'Donnell, has been experiencing some legal problems related to addiction issues. 

Most news orgs have behaved in an appropriate way. In the manner which has become the trademark of the Gutfeld! show, the program's host decided to give the world this right at the start of last Thursday's program:

GUTFELD (2/26/26): Rosie O'Donnell's daughter Chelsea has been accused of assault after touching a man's genitals. 

Apparently, she never learned boundaries growing up watching farmers milk her mom.

It was one of his opening "jokes." He had joked about the same topic the night before, in a slightly less astonishing way.

When does a society decide it's time for conduct like this to go? In the matter of this "cable news" channel, this peculiar person's pathetic behavior has been enabled by Blue America every step of the way.

Please don't ask us to chronicle the endless ugliness of this primetime "cable news" program. "Jokes" about Rashida Tlaib's hairy face have been frequent in the past two weeks, as is the reliable norm.

(The ladies of the Fox News Channel just sit there as if nothing is happening. So do all the highly principled columnists at the New York Times.)

Last night, Obama was from Kenya again. Fox rolls this garbage can out each night. Blue America looks away.

The war began late Friday night. In the case of these "cable news" programs, it would be hard to chronicle the full extent of the gruesome surroundings.

Tomorrow: We no longer talk about this