TUESDAY: The Washington Post spotted Us versus Them...

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2026

...in one small Virginia town: Purcellville could still be called a small American town.

More precisely, it's a fairly small Virginia town. The leading authority on the town offers this statistic:

Purcellville, Virginia

Purcellville is a town in Loudoun County, Virginia, United States. The population was 8,929 according to the 2020 census. Purcellville is the major population center for Western Loudoun and the Loudoun Valley. Many of the older structures remaining in Purcellville reflect the Victorian architecture popular during the early twentieth century.

By our reckoning, that still counts as a fairly small town.

For the record, the town is located fifty miles west of Washington, D.C. We learned that in this report in the Washington Posta report in which the Washington Post says it has spotted an unfortunate state of affairs:

‘Us versus them’: The battle that’s tearing a small Virginia town apart

The town council meeting had reached the point on the agenda where the public could speak on any topic, and emotions, to put it mildly, were a tad raw.

“It’s not too late to resign!” a woman shouted at the lawmakers, four of whom, including the mayor, are the focus of a recall campaign.

“Stop screwing our town!” a man railed.

“We are broke and sicker of you than ever!” someone else yelled.

Oof! According to the Washington Post, Purcellville currently finds itself split into a battle of "Us versus Them." In this case, the Us versus Them isn't Red versus Bluebut we were somewhat amused by that headline in the Post.

Can you possibly think of a larger polity which is also split into Us versus Them, though this time in a way which really is Red versus Blue? Which is split into Us versus Them is a baldly dangerous way? Which is split in this dangerous way in part due to corporate profit chasing?

The larger polity to which we refer is of course the United States of America! Its population is roughly 340 million, and it's very severely split into two tribesthe Red but also the Blue.

This dangerous state of antagonism is fueled by certain "cable news" corporate entities. On this campus, we regard the Fox News Channel as the worst of the lot, but the Blue American channel called MS NOW has been a part of this syndrome too.

(It can be hard for us Blues to apprehend that last point. Sic semper tribal vision!)

The Post is prepared to report on the tribal split in Purcellville. It's perhaps a bit less inclined to do so when it comes to the deeply dangerous split which obtains in that larger polity. 

As for the New York Times, it refuses to report and discuss the conduct observed on the Fox News Channel, even when that conduct vastly departs from all traditional journalistic norms.

(For the record, those changes can be seen, and frequently are, as changes for the better. But when those changes as so extreme, they constitute obvious "news.")

We may have more of this tomorrow, but for today, we'll leave you with this:

Roughly eleven days ago, the sitting president reposted a brainless diatribe about the 2020 election. It ended with a sudden, now-famous ape shot. 

Our question:

How frequently have viewers of the Fox News Channel ever heard that fact reported? Have viewers of the Fox News Channel ever heard about that Truth Social post at all?

Also, why is that the sort of thing you will never see reported by the New York Times or by any of its columnists? What keeps an intriguing question like that from being explored and reported?

We close today with our basic journalistic query:

Why is division newsworthy in one small town, but apparently nowhere else?

Tomorrow: What Wes Moore (correctly) said?


KAFKA'S DESCENDANTS: "Strategic ambiguity," she should have said!

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2026

The "clown show" to which he referred: AOC went to Munich last week. While she was there, at least one "stumble" occurred.

At this point, full disclosure:

On balance, it wouldn't really have occurred to us that Rep. Ocasio-Cortez would be viewed as a serious contender to become the next president. But that's the way her most-hyped stumble is being played across our nation's pseudo-discourse, wherever the "clown show" is performed.

Yesterday, it was widely performed on the Fox News Channel, by a succession of corporate messenger agents. But first, a word about the gong-show Valhalla to which "cable news" has long since flown.

We'll start at 4 o'clock yesterday afternoon, with The Will Cain Show.

The program appears on the Fox News Channel. Wisely or otherwise, the first 58 minutes of yesterday's show was dedicated to the search for Nancy Guthrie. Nothing beside remained!

At 4:58 p.m., Cain devoted the last two minutes of his show to the mocking of AOC. He mocked her for a remark about cowboys, and then it was time for The Five!

Harlequins tumbled onto the set of our most-watched "cable news" program. The children devoted their first segment to—of course—the Guthrie search. Then the real clowning began, the daily imitation of life:

Segment One: The search in Tucson for Nancy Guthrie
Segment Two: The stupid thing Obama allegedly said
Segment Three: Schumer, HRC launch dumb attacks
Segment Four: The stupid thing AOC allegedly said

In all honesty, Obama hadn't said a stupid thing—but this, after all, was The Five

In the podcast discussion under review, the former president had referred to the "clown show" with which we're all currently saddled. Almost surely, he wasn't thinking of The Five, or even of the Fox News Channel, when he made that remark.

Yesterday, though, the wider clown show just kept rolling along. During Segment Three, the children could have tried to explain the contents of the SAVE Act—but, this being The Five, no such attempt occurred.

On the Fox News Channel, but even more so on CNN, the focus on Tucson was considerable. Wisely or otherwise, CNN devoted its time to little else as the afternoon and evening proceeded. 

CNN made the rest of the world go away as its hosts, and their expert guests, yammered about the search and about little else. But let's return to AOC—to the stumble in which she engaged.

Full disclosure:

By now, our next presidential election is less than three years away. Given the (intellectual) "wickedness of the times," that means we need to start wasting our time yammering about possible White House contenders!

On cable, we'll make the rest of the world go away in deference to the Tucson search. But as an additional part of our national foolishness, we'll also make the world go away in deference to stumbles like this, as reported on page A6 of Sunday's New York Times:

Ocasio-Cortez Offers a Working-Class Vision in Munich, With Some Stumbles

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, a progressive who made a name for herself focused on economic problems at home in America, might have seemed an odd fit for the Munich Security Conference, an annual gathering of foreign leaders and diplomats focused on international security.

But at two Friday panels, she tied worsening income inequality to the rise of authoritarianism, weaving her working-class worldview into a broader message about combating far-right populism and strengthening relationships with Western allies. Everyday people, she argued, were turning away from democracy because wealthy elites had failed to address their needs.

[...] 

Ms. Ocasio-Cortez has stepped up her visibility in recent months as a leader for Democrats as they oppose President Trump. Speculation about her future political ambitions—she has long been considered a potential presidential candidate—was rife in Munich. Her mere presence was scrutinized as a hint that perhaps she was considering a White House bid and brushing up on world affairs.

"She has long been considered a potential presidential candidate?" 

To us, that seems remarkably premature. But in Munich, as of course on The Five, "speculation about her future political ambitions was rife!"

Eventually, the New York Times got around to reporting the most prominent of her stumbles. With respect to what AOC said, the Times quoted the part of her statement which it viewed as a stumble, then paraphrased the rest:

Questioned about whether the United States should send troops to defend Taiwan if China invaded the island, she stalled for roughly 20 seconds before offering a substantive response.

“I think that, uh, this is such a, a—you know, I think that—this is a, um—this is of course, a, uh, a very longstanding, um, policy of the United States,” Ms. Ocasio-Cortez said, before saying that the country should try to avoid reaching that point with China in the first place.

It was a striking moment from a self-assured legislator who is normally nimble at answering impromptu questions from reporters on Capitol Hill, and conservative critics seized on the stumble online. Earlier in the day, she also made a reference to the “Trans-Pacific Partnership”—later correcting that on social media to “trans-Atlantic.”

A person surely could see that as the first of a pair of stumbles. She did, in fact, stammer in a lengthy way, as judged by political norms.

On The Five, the channel went one step beyond what the New York Times did. On The Five, they played the tape of that first twenty seconds, then never mentioned the fact that AOC ever managed to offer " a substantive response" at all.

In all honesty, even her "substantive response" wasn't especially sharp. But what had she perhaps been thinking as she stumbled and stalled?

Who knows? But she may have been trying to recall a pair of words—a pair of words which has long been used to describe U.S. policy with respect to China and Taiwan. Here's the start of a second report by the New York Times about this recent underwhelming event:

After First Big Overseas Trip, Ocasio-Cortez Expresses Frustrations

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez had anticipated a potentially frosty reception to her anti-establishment arguments at the Munich Security Conference, a venue she called “an elite place of decision makers that, frankly, are not responsive to a class-based message.”

And the visit to Germany felt high-stakes: It was the most prominent foreign trip to date by the progressive New York congresswoman, who had mostly focused on domestic priorities until now. Her remarks last week about addressing working-class concerns around the globe, and the reception from world leaders, were both eagerly awaited and highly scrutinized.

But rather than the substance of her arguments, it was her on-camera stumbles when answering questions about specific world affairs that rocketed around conservative social media and drove plenty of the discussion about her visit, as political observers speculated whether they would make a dent in a potential presidential run in 2028.

The most notable instance was when she was asked whether the United States should send troops to aid Taiwan if China invaded the island. She stalled for roughly 20 seconds before offering a response that reflected the United States’ longtime policy of strategic ambiguity.

"Strategic ambiguity?" Let us say this about that:

On this campus, we don't know diddly about foreign affairs. But even we knew that that's the phrase which has long been used to describe this country's highly nuanced stance with respect to that famously delicate policy question.

Even we knew—and yes, that has long been viewed as a challenging policy question. If memory serves, President Trump has even had some stumbles along the way with this knotty topic—and that's surprising, because on The Five, the former "wrestler" who now performs as "Tyrus" thoughtfully told Red America this:

TYRUS (2/16/26): The one thing that Barack Obama and President Trump had in common is that they are communicators of a higher— Like, their brilliance when they're called on something? You're never going to see Obama or President Trump asked a question that they can't answer...They're always prepared.

You'll never see President Trump asked a question he can't answer? The former "wrestler" went on from there, but the analysts were groaning so loudly that we couldn't quite hear what he said.

Before we try to summarize, we're going to tell you this:

Yesterday, the sheriff of Pima County issued a formal statement. In it, he said that members of the Guthrie family have been totally cleared with respect to the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie.

On this morning's Morning Joe, Mika and Willie dedicated their roughly two-minute discussion of Tucson to the praise they heaped upon the sheriff for having made that declaration. Yesterday, on the frequently maligned Fox News Channel, Will Cain articulated a different view:

He quickly noted, quite correctly, that whatever the truth may turn out to be, that declaration by the sheriff doesn't seem to make any sense. We'd have to say that Cain's view was right, and that Mika and Willie were simply reading from insider cable guild script.

Everywhere FDR looked in 1944, he said he saw "one-third of a nation ill-housed, ill-clad, ill-nourished." Everywhere we look today, we think we see a flailing nation profoundly ill-served by a collection of imitations of life.

The disorder is so general that it's hard to sum it all up. But what does that have to do with Kafka? Before the week is done, we'll try to spell that out.

That said, our own Blue realm is frequently involved in these "clown shows" too. As is the norm at times of tribal war, it's hard for us Blues to see that.

In closing, also this, as we noted yesterday afternoon:

AOC also said what's shown below. As the US seems to break away from the EU, this statement seems hard to deny—and in the possible clownishness of the times, no one is talking about it:

"[Our presidential administration is] looking to withdraw the United States from the entire world so that we can turn into an age of authoritarians that can carve out the world where Donald Trump can command the Western Hemisphere and Latin America as his personal sandbox, where Putin can saber-rattle around Europe and try to bully our own allies there," she said.

Is it possible that she was right about that? We say it pretty much is!

It's impossible to sum the clown shows up. We're trying as hard as we can, but the various floodings of the zone are inundating our sprawling campus.

Before the week is done: What might Kafka have seen?

MONDAY: Is it really Presidents' Day again?

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2026

Things we may find plausible: Presidents' Day is here again. Speaking with sports pundit Stephen A. Smith, Robert Costa popped this question:

“Do you worry about racism if you ran for president?”

Journalist Costa, please! For ourselves, we've watched Smith on ESPN for yearsbut have we all lost our minds as we picture a White House campaign?

(You too, Bill Maher! Comedian Bill Maher, please!)

In a somewhat similar vein, it doesn't seem to us that AOC would likely be a plausible candidate for president the next time around. That said:

Especially inside Silo Red, messengers have been beating up on her reaction to a question about Taiwan during last week's Munich conference. 

In our view, the messengers may have been declaiming a bit too much with respect to that "stumble." That said:

Whatever you think about that response, less attention is being paid to what she said in this instance:

Ocasio-Cortez Offers a Working-Class Vision in Munich, With Some Stumbles

[...]

"[Our presidential administration is] looking to withdraw the United States from the entire world so that we can turn into an age of authoritarians that can carve out the world where Donald Trump can command the Western Hemisphere and Latin America as his personal sandbox, where Putin can saber-rattle around Europe and try to bully our own allies there," she said.

Is that what the White House is trying to do? We can't necessarily answer that question, but it certainly can look that way at times. 

Happy Presidents' Day, everybody! That remark by Ocasio-Cortez has been cited much less often.


KAFKA'S DESCENDANTS: As we watched the stumblebums try to report...

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2026

...we were driven to thoughts about Kafka: Early this morning, the haplessness known as Stumblebum Chic had us flashing on Kafka. 

On cable TV and in major newspapers, we the people were trying to report the progress of the Guthrie search. The sheer incompetence concerning the glove[s] returned us to thoughts about this:

Franz Kafka

Franz Kafka (1883 – 1924) was a German-language Jewish Czech writer and novelist born in Prague, in the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Widely regarded as a major figure of 20th-century literature, his works fuse elements of realism and the fantastique, and typically feature isolated protagonists facing bizarre or surreal predicaments and incomprehensible socio-bureaucratic powers. The term Kafkaesque has entered the lexicon to describe situations like those depicted in his writings. His best-known works include the novella The Metamorphosis (1915) and the novels The Trial (1924) and The Castle (1926)...

And so on from there. According to that leading (and rather highbrow) authority, he trafficked in "the fantastique" (click here), especially in this famous novella:

The Metamorphosis

The Metamorphosis, also translated as The Transformation, is a novella by Franz Kafka published in 1915. One of Kafka's best-known works, The Metamorphosis tells the story of salesman Gregor Samsa, who wakes to find himself inexplicably transformed into a huge insect (German: ungeheueres Ungeziefer, lit. "monstrous vermin") and struggles to adjust to this condition, as does his family. The novella has been widely discussed among literary critics, who have offered varied interpretations...

Plot

Gregor Samsa wakes up one morning to find himself transformed into a "monstrous vermin." He initially considers the transformation to be temporary and slowly ponders the consequences of his metamorphosis. Stuck on his back and unable to get up and leave the bed, Gregor reflects on his job as a traveling salesman and cloth merchant, which he characterizes as being "plagued with ... the always changing, never enduring human exchanges that don't ever become intimate."

As the novella continues, the circumstances of Samsa's transformation become increasingly awful. 

Is Gregor Samsa facing "a bizarre or surreal predicament," to which he "struggles to adjust?" At present, our struggling nation finds itself in a similar stew, though that isn't the main component of the instruction we find lurking there. 

Early this morning, we began to flash on this awful tale as we clicked through the efforts of our flailing American press corps to report on the various glove[s].

With apologies, the gloves in question are the various gloves which have been found by investigators in Tucson. Especially in major organs of Red America's press, the stumblebums to whom we've referred have attempted, for almost a week, to report how many gloves have been found, and to explain their potential significance.

How many gloves had police investigators found? Was it one glove, or possible two, or was it as many as three? Last Thursday, Fox News Digital went with this:

Nancy Guthrie case investigators find black gloves near roadside

A pair of black gloves recovered near Nancy Guthrie’s Tucson-area home is being tested for DNA, marking the latest development in the investigation into her disappearance.

Authorities said the gloves were found roughly a mile and a half from her Catalina Foothills residence, though it is not yet known whether they are connected to the masked individual captured on surveillance video at the home. There were conflicting reports about whether there was one glove or a pair of gloves.

Deputies and FBI agents were seen searching desert brush along a nearby roadside late Wednesday into early Thursday, focusing on terrain about a mile from the property...

Had they found two gloves, or had they found only one? It doesn't get much clearer than that!

That night, it fell to Jesse Watters, to host the announcement that a glove had been found right inside Nancy Guthrie's house! The announcement was excitedly made on Jesse Watters Primetime last Thursday night. It was then excitedly repeated on Hannity and on Fox News Tonight, and then on Fox & Friends the next morning.

Later that day, it fell to the sheriff of Pima County to report the fact that this claim had been pure bunk. That night, Watters offered a roughly three-word non-retraction retraction as the stumblebum conduct rolled on.

As of this very morning, how many (relevant) gloves actually have been found? Is the number one, or could it be two? Even this morning, major news orgs continue to offer contradictory reports on that pointand not only that:

Bizarrely, a new number has crawled out on the scenesixteen. When PBS reposted an AP report, here's how the news report ended:

Glove found near Guthrie home with traces of DNA appears to match those worn by masked suspect

A glove containing DNA found about two miles from the house of "Today" show host Savannah Guthrie's mother appears to match those worn by a masked person outside her front door in Tucson the night she vanished, the FBI said Sunday. 

[...]

The FBI also has said approximately 16 gloves were found in various spots near the house, most of which were searchers' gloves that had been discarded.

Say what? Approximately sixteen gloves have been found "near the house?" Most of them were simply "gloves which had been discarded" by searchers? 

Some of the searchers threw them away? Other searchers came along and "found" them?

Why would law enforcement personnel discard their own gloves in the course of conducting their search? On this morning's Morning Joe, we finally saw someone raise that obvious question, though with no explanation given.

Meanwhile, as you can see, that PBS / AP report says that one glove appears to be relevant. But this is what the New York Times is reporting this morning, even now, as we type:

The F.B.I. said Sunday that gloves found about two miles from Nancy Guthrie’s home carried an unknown man’s DNA. Authorities planned to enter the DNA profile into a database in an effort to identify the person. The bureau said in a statement that the gloves appeared to match a pair worn by the man who was captured on Guthrie’s doorbell camera on the night she was abducted. The F.B.I. added that most of the other gloves recovered during its searches were those of investigators who had discarded them while conducting sweeps near the home.

The New York Times refers to "gloves"plural. The Times also reports that other gloves found near the home had in fact simply been discarded by investigators, but it spares readers the mystery of learning that the number of those discarded gloves lands somewhere in the mid-teens.

(Why would investigators litter an active crime scene that way? Like others, the Times doesn't ask. For the record, the Times offers no link to the text of that FBI statement.)

So it goes as we the humans attempt to report the basic facts about an event which the Fox News Channel has heavily prioritized for at least the past nine days. On balance, we'd limn it like this:

Red America's press has gone all in on this news topic. By way of contrast, and perhaps more sensibly, Blue America's press has treated it as one news topic among many. 

For that reason, the stumblebums of Fox News and the New York Post have driven the reporting of the tiny handful of available facts. For us, the maddening bungles found all through the reporting has driven us straight back to Kafka.

Full disclosure! We've seen several major figures make intelligent comments about various matters in the past several days. We would include such names as these:

Marco Rubio. AOC. Barack Obama. Governor Wes Moore, regarding the topic of this earlier opinion piece by Colby Hall.

We've seen some people make sensible statements in the past few days. But over at the Fox News Channel, the stumblebums and the even more deranged individuals decided to drive the reporting of this matter. As a result, citizens have been told that it was one glove, or two, or maybe threeand now it seems to turn out that the number is really sixteen!

Gregor Samsa turned into a cockroach? Have you ever watched the Gutfeld! showa "cable news" program which airs in prime time each weekday night? 

(That program's vulgar, dimwitted presentations often reflect unregulated anger turned loose on reasonable complaints and critiques.)

Starting tomorrow, we want to tell you why we flashed on Kafka this morning as we tore our hair about the journalistic transformations which now threaten our faltering nation.

According to the leading authority, Kafka's protagonists, including the instantly transformed Gregor Samsa, frequently found themselves "facing bizarre or surreal predicaments." This nation is facing such a predicament, though our leading lights in Blue America may not be describing it well.

Kafka may have been deeply depressedor he may have been able to see something about the human condition. We haven't mentioned the sitting president yet, though he will be a key player in this story as the week rolls along.

As our exploration continues, we'll return to his apparent affliction, and to the refusal of major Blue American orgs to discuss what's right there before themto attempt to report and fully describe the transformation at hand. We'll even discuss, if only briefly, the intelligent things which have been said by AOC, by Barack Obama, by Wes Moore, and even perhaps by Rubio, we're willing to say right here.

Was Franz Kafka severely depressedor could he simply see something? For today, how many (relevant) gloves have been found? 

Citizen, don't even ask!

Tomorrow: In our view, it's rather hard to disagree with what AOC said!


SATURDAY: The miracle suddenly looks like this!

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2026

Eighth-graders bypass Lourdes: We'd call it one of his weak spots. 

As we noted in Monday's report, Nicholas Kristof has endorsed the claim of that "Mississippi miracle" in a recent column for the New York Times.

(To his credit, he didn't use the term "miracle," nor has he done so in the past. Almost everyone does.)

The miracle involves the miraculous Naep scores produced by that state's (good, decent, deserving) public school kids. As you may know, the Naep is a highly regarded federal program which tests reading and math, every few years, in Grade 4 and Grade 8. 

(For most purposes, there are reasons to skip the Grade 12 scores.). 

The Naep is a highly regarded program. On Tuesday, we focused on this miraculous finding, as cited in Kristof's column:

These Three Red States Are the Best Hope in Schooling

[...]

Black fourth graders in Mississippi are on average better readers than those in Massachusetts, which is often thought to have the best public school system in the country (and one that spends twice as much per pupil).

Say what? Mississippi's black fourth graders outperformed their counterparts in Massachusetts? 

At least on its face, that claim is correct! Whatever the explanation might be, here are the relevant scores from the most recent testing:

Average scores, 2024 Naep 
Black kids, Grade 4 reading

Massachusetts: 202.86
Mississippi: 205.93

If genuine, that may or may not constitute a miracle. But given the circumstances mentioned by Kristof, it looks like a major accomplishment.

(According to a very rough rule of thumb, a gap of 10-11 points on the Naep is often said to correspond, very roughly, to one academic year.)

As if to prove that everyone makes mistakes, we then uncorked a whopper. (As we've mentioned several times, the incessant flooding of the zone has had us feeling overwhelmed. Plus, the Super Bowl!)

As of today, a double groaner has been corrected in Tuesday's report. What we had meant to present can be seen belowMississippi's white fourth graders also came fairly close to matching the kids up north:

Average scores, 2024 Naep
White kids, Grade 4 reading

Massachusetts: 233.21
Mississippi: 230.85

(By the way: When we look at the giant gaps between white and black kids in each of those states, do we really want to claim that anyone's producing a miracle at this point in time?)

At any rate, there you see the fourth grade scores from the most recent Naep. Mississippi's black kids outscored their peers in Massachusetts. Mississippi's white kids came close.

If nothing is "wrong" with those test scores, that result would seem to represent a substantial, surprising accomplishment. That said, adult life doesn't begin after fourth gradeand here are the corresponding scores from that same year for eighth grade students in those two states:

Average scores, 2024 Naep
Black kids, Grade 8 reading

Massachusetts: 252.03
Mississippi: 242.94
Average scores, 2024 Naep
White kids, Grade 8 reading

Massachusetts: 275.88
Mississippi: 263.83

Borrowing from the early Dylan: But oh, what kind of miracle is this, which goes from great to worse?

There you see a puzzling aspect of this alleged miracle. Over the course of quite a few years, Mississippi's fourth graders have been racking up surprising, nearly miraculous test scores. But by the time the state's kids reach Grade 8, the scores continue to look quite a bit like what they were in the past.

Quickly, let's state the obvious:

The fourth graders who performed so well in 2024 may still be performing that well when they reach the eighth grade and are tested in 2028. But Mississippi's well-intention education reforms have been in place for a long time, and this same pattern keeps showing up:

A miracle seems to be present in Grade 4. But there's no sign of any such phenomenon when you look at the scores from Grade 8.

Why might such a pattern obtain? After fifty years of flogging varieties of this horse, we won't waste our time going there today. For today, we'll only ask you this:

If kids are doing well in fourth grade, but have regressed by the time they finish eighth grade, then what good was that early achievementassuming it really existed?

Kristof cited the Grade 4 scores; he didn't cite Grade 8. In the process, he retold a type of story which has been told ever since the 1960s, when we the people began to pretend that we actually care about black kids.

It's the story of the (alleged) public school miracle, allegedly produced by the handful of people who actually care! Versions of this story have floated around at least since 1967, when 36 Children appeared

In the early 1970s, by total coincidence, we stumbled upon one of the ways miraculous test scores will sometimes appear. (Two friends described the outrageous cheating taking place in their high-scoring, low-income schoola school which was endlessly praised in the Baltimore Sun.)

By the early 1980s, we had stumbled into a telephone relationship with a top executive at one of that era's major testing companies. He was the first to tell us how bad this phenomenon can sometimes get. 

(He told us that school districts can pay to have their students' answer sheets scanned for unusual erasure patterns. Three decades later, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution blew the whistle on the "erasure parties" staged within Atlanta's schools, in which teachers gathered to change reams of wrong answers on students' completed answer sheets to the answers which was correct.)

We know of zero reason to assume that any such fraudulent behavior ever took place in Mississippi. As far as we know, no such misconduct is even possible with respect to the Naep, given the way the Naep is administered.

That said, one event after another, through many long years, convinced us that no one should ever accept these miracle claims on their face. Simple story:

Our journalists love to tell these storiesand repeatedly, these stories turn out to be bogus.

We the humans have pleasing stories we simply love to tell! The story of the educational miracle engineered by the handful of people who actually care is one of these treasured tales.

Note to Kristof, whose overall work we marvel at and greatly admire:

Our "education experts" were endlessly asleep at the switch, down through the many long years, as these feel-good stories came and went. So was the New York Times! When the whistle was finally blown on major cheating scandals in Atlanta and (apparently) in D.C., it was the Atlanta paper, and the much-maligned USA Today, which finally did the work.

(When Michelle Rhee was nominated to be chancellor of the D.C. schools, it was obvious that something was crazily wrong with the test score gains she was claiming from her short teaching career. It was obvious that her claims didn't make statistical sensebut so what? The Washington Post agreed to roll over and pretend that nothing was wrong.)

(Also, Philadelphia.)

Yes, Virginia! We were even present, behind the scenes, when Dr. John Cannell unveiled his Lake Wobegon Reports in the late 1980swhen he reported, perhaps a bit inaccurately, that every state in the nation was reporting that their statewide test scores were, in fact, above average! 

That was a wonderfully comical narrative hook, and the nation's journalists briefly took note. After that, our education journalists went back to sleep, snoring loudly alongside our education experts.

(Back in 2006, we demonstrated that the miracle story concerning one Washington area elementary school was in fact horribly wrong. The Washington Post's Jay Mathews, with whom we share the old school system tie and whose work we greatly admire, told the tale right here.)

Full disclosure: There are certain feel-good stories we humans love to tell! We continue to tell those stories, no matter how often such stories turn out to be bogus.

As to the apparent anomalies in Mississippi's scoring patterns, we know of zero reason to think that overt acts of fraud have ever been part of the story. (Repeatwe know of zero reason.) 

That said, the scoring pattern doesn't seem to make sense. Still, the story lives on.

Anthropologists crowd our dreams at night, telling us things like this:

This is who, and this is what, we actually are as a species!

For the record, there's a different possible explanation for those anomalous Mississippi scoring patterns. We don't know if it's right or wrong.

(Then too, we can think of one or two more.)

We're no longer going to bother with such maddening explorations. That's especially true at this point, as the entire American political structure may be crashing to the ground. 

Is something "wrong" with those Grade 4 scores? To this day, we can't answer that question. We can say that Mississippi's eighth grade scores don't seem to be playing along.

Again, we apologize for Tuesday's dispiriting blunder. We've corrected the blunder in Tuesday's report. The flooding of the zone!

Now for the rest of the story: Still in the early 1980s, that high executive told us that he was leaving the testing business. He said that his company was losing market share to a rival testing companyand he said they felt they couldn't compete, because the rival company was allegedly faking its data (its "norms") so as to produce better test scores.

The executive, who is no longer living, went on to a different public career. Just for the record: 

At that time, it was publicly reported that the Iowa Test of Basic Skills was losing substantial market share to the California Achievement Test. At some point, the switch was made here in Baltimore, perhaps because it was widely bruited that urban systems ended up with better scores on the latter test.

We're telling you what the executive said. We don't know if his suspicions were accurate.