WEDNESDAY: How well are America's schoolkids doing?

WEDNESDAY, JULY 8, 2026

There's no single way to tell: How well are America's children doing? Our 9-year-old students, let's say.  

There's no easy way to answer such a worthwhile question. That said, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) tested a national sample of such kids last year.   

How strong are the skills of These Kids Today? Results may see to differ depending on where you start your comparisons, if you choose to approach things that way.   

For today, we'll go back a good long ways. The Long Term Trend version of the NAEP goes back a bit farther than we will, but this is how last year's numbers look as compared to the numbers from 1980 (reading) and 1982 (math):

Average scores, 9-year-old students  
Reading, Long Term Trend NAEP

1980 / 2025

All students: 215.04 / 218.39
Black kids: 189.35 / 204.62
Hispanic kids: 190.22 / 207.59
White kids: 221.34 / 224.79
Asian kids: 224.56 / 242.48
Average scores, 9-year-old students
Math, Long Term Trend NAEP
 
1982 / 2025

All students: 218.98 / 237.67
Black kids: 194.94 / 220.19
Hispanic kids: 204.00 / 226.24
White kids: 223.95 / 245.82
Asian kids: 241.60 / 260.11

Now for the rest of the story:  

Average scores have risen since those early years, especially in math. For the record, we aren't cherry-picking those starting points. Math and reading were tested in separate years back in those earlier days.   

That said, how large are the academic gains suggested by those numbers? On the Main NAEP, it's often said, as a very rough rule of thumb, that 10-11 points on the NAEP scale is roughly equivalent to one academic year.  

You can start applying that (very rough) rule of thumb to the data shown above. At your favorite major news sites, you'll see no one try to inform you in more detail about the meaning of those statistical gains. In fact, no one cares about any of this, and no one ever has or ever will.   

Based upon last year's numbers, 9-year-old students have come a long way since the 1980 / 1982 testing. The Main NAEP shows similar progress when we go back that many years.  

To review the difference between the two different versions of the NAEP, you can just click here

For access to all data from the Long Term Trend NAEP, you can start by clicking this. From there, you're on your own


LONG ENDURE: Technologies threaten our cool reflection!

WEDNESDAY, JULY 8, 2026

So Rosen wisely says: No one's assessments are unassailable, perfect. But in our view, the inanity never stops at one of our struggling nation's three (3) major "cable news" channels. 

Last night, at 8:06 p.m., that channel's chyron said this:  

EVEN COMMIES WANT PLATNER GONE  

Yes, that's what it said.   

The channel to which we refer was the Fox News Channel. The show was Jesse Watters Primetime, the second most-watched "cable news" show within the American firmament.   

With Watters rumored to be vacationing in the south of France, Charlie Hurt was filling in as the program's host. He came on the air excitedly citing an actual news event:   

WATTERS (7/7/26): Welcome to a special edition of Jesse Watters Primetime. I'm Charlie Hurt, filling in for Jesse. 

We start with a Fox News alert:

Another bombshell scandal just blew up inside the Democrat tent. Graham Platner, who has been accused of outrageous drinking, manhandling women, and sexting outside of his marriage, has just been accused of sexual assault. 

It was an actual news event. Indeed, as Hurt continued, he offered his basic citation:  

[continuing directly
Lyndsey Fifield, at the center of last month's New York Times piece, just spoke to CNN, and she is accusing the Democratic Senate candidate from Maine of being hostile and violent towards women. She is speaking out just 24 hours after the first ex-girl friend spoke to CNN. 

A minor bungle is included in that brief overview. But this was an actual news eventa news event the Fox News Channel was able to discuss thanks to reporting provided by CNN. 

Indeed, all three major cable news channels opened their 8 p.m. program last night with this topic. That said, only one hurried to offer the braindead chyron we mentioned above. Let's ponder that chyron again:   

EVEN COMMIES WANT PLATNER GONE  

Yes, that's what the chyron said. You can't get dumber than these mofos are, but they'll surely continue to try.   

Three hours earlier, at 5 p.m., the nation's most-watched "cable news" show opened with the previous day's news about Platner. That news had also been broken by CNN.

The Five opened with that. One of its stars had returned from the south of France, but Jessica Tarlov was gone: 

The Five: Tuesday, July 7, 2026 
Kennedy: former MTV VJ 
Harold Ford: former congressman (D-Tenn.) 
Brian Kilmeade: co-host, Fox & Friends 
Dana Perino: co-host, The Five
Greg Gutfeld: host, Gutfeld!

We noted a type of irony as the four pro-MAGA players took turns saying the very same things, as they typically do.

On this evening, the four were shocked and appalled by the litany of accusations floating around Platner's head. No one mentioned an awkward fact: 

The president they treat as a successor to the sun god Ra has a gruesome record in this areaa record which matches, or even surpasses, that of Platner. But no such facts will ever be mentioned on this astonishing imitation of corporate propaganda messaging vehicle which poses as a news program. 

The four pounded away at Democrats who had supported Platner in spite of his record. They failed to note that they themselves are still adopting the same stance with respect to the record of sexual conduct surrounding Citizen Trump.

We move to a somewhat strange fact:

In his recent essay for The Atlantic, Jeffrey Rosenhe's very sharpdoesn't mention the Fox News Channel. Also, he doesn't mention MS NOW or CNN, or cable news in general.  

That said, he does mention some new technologies which have created, or so he says, a threat to the continued existence of our American democracy, imperfect though our democracy has always been.   

Rosen says it, and we believe it! Here's the heart of the way his essay starts, dual headline included

IDEAS
American Democracy Wasn’t Designed for This
Can our 18th-century institutions survive 21st-century technology?

In 1787, after the Founders signed the Constitution in Philadelphia, Alexander Hamilton wrote in “Federalist No. 1” that there was more at stake than the future of a single country. The American experiment would “decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force.”

The Founders were hopeful, in part because the information environment of the late 18th century was favorable to “reflection and choice.” A flourishing newspaper industry kept Americans informed and fostered vigorous debate...And at a time when nothing traveled faster than a horse or ship, the sheer size of the new country meant that news spread slowly, an obstacle to impulsive public decisions....

Today, those advantages have disappeared, thanks to a technological revolution the Founders could never have imagined.... As America approaches its 250th anniversary, the biggest question for our democracy is whether a system designed for the communications technologies of the 18th century can survive those of the 21st.  

Are we the peoplewe the humanscapable of making the kinds of judgments needed to maintain a "western democracy?" Are we "really capable of establishing good government" through widespread reasoned "reflection?"  

Are we the American people still capable of such acts? Professor Rosen says he isn't entirely sure. 

Quite correctly in our view, he says that certain new technologies are making that outcome much less certain. As his essay beginsin the deletions we have madehe specifically mentions the Internet and social media, with the onset of AI also mentioned.

Later, he specifically mentions podcastsbut he never mentions talk radio, and he doesn't mention cable news. Possibly stretching the term bit, it might be said those are two additional technologies which have transformed, and are continuing to transform, our "information environment." 

There's never been a time when foolishness didn't exist within the human environment. That said, today's technologies have created a world in which chyrons like the one cited above go out to millions of people, and they go out extremely fast.

EVEN COMMIES WANT PLATNER GONE!

That's what the silly/sad chyron sillily said. As we close for today, we'll borrow a word from the Atlantic headlines posted above:

Can our society expect to "survive" the round-the-clock, daily drubbing administered by the technologies now in play? 

Rosen says the answer may be no. We'll suggest that Rosen is giving voice to an extremely important point.

Tomorrow: One month plus three days


LONG ENDURE: "Our democracy wasn’t designed for this?"

TUESDAY, JULY 7, 2026

Who is Jeffrey Rosen? Inevitably, the initial segment on The Five began with the Communist / Commies rant.

The Fourth of July had come and gone. Yesterday, Dana Perino started the show by playing the relevant clips from the president's rain-drenched address:

PERINO (7/6/26): Hello, everyone. It's 5 o'clock in New York City and this is The Five.

President Trump, bringing the fight against Communism to America's 250th birthday celebrations...

PRESIDENT TRUMP (videotape): We don't want Communists in our country.
PRESIDENT TRUMP (videotape):  Communism is a loser and it always will be. The Communist system is the opposite of the American system and the Communist system has never worked. Our warriors did not fight Communism on battlefields across the world only to have that menace rear its ugly head right back here in America. We're not going to let it happen.   

So said the president on July 4, in a rainy-day address. Now, it fell to the stars of The Five to move the agitprop along. 

This being a summer holiday week, several of the program's top stars are off in the south of France. For that reason, a slightly second-string lineup was messaging the public this day:  

The Five: Monday, July 6, 2026 
Kennedy: former MTV VJ 
Jessica Tarlov: resident punching bag 
Joey Johnny Jones: co-host, The Big Weekend Show 
Dana Perino: co-host, The Five
Tom Shillue: comedian

That was yesterday's lineup. After Perino played videotape of the president's statement, something designed to resemble a discussion ensued. 

Before long, Perino threw to Shillue. Inevitably, he took the cake

SHILLUE (7/6/26): If you look at the Trump speech, he uses the "Communism" thing a lot, but he goes on several levels.  

So he says, "Oh, the Commies are coming. We beat them. We went to war against the Commies, and we would do it again, but we don't have to."   

And then he would say, "Never worked, never will." See, that's the message that young people need to hear...    

It's great the way he— You know, when he gives a speech, you can see the speech, and then you see the boldface [points]...then he has his asides. So he said his bit about Communism, then he said, "It never worked, it never will," and then he said, "Communism is for losers, we don't want it."    

So it's like working on many different levels.  

We don't understand that either. So many different levels! 

Let's be fair. As best we can tell, no one but Shillue stooped to talking about "the Commies" this day. But the messaging continued through the program's first half hour, with The MAGA Four all issuing C-bombs and with Tarlov being interrupted, as is the norm on this show.   

This is no country for intelligent discourse! Or at least, that's the impression we may get when we watch this top-rated "cable news" TV program. 

The viewership for The Five dwarfs that of corresponding programs on CNN and MS NOW. In our view, this helps explain the salience of Jeffrey Rosen's month-old essay for The Atlantic.

Rosen's essay appears beneath this dual headline. Who the heck is Jeffrey Rosen, and why is he saying these things?

IDEAS
American Democracy Wasn’t Designed for This  
Can our 18th-century institutions survive 21st-century technology?

Can our institutions survive? Who the heck is Jeffrey Rosen, and why is he asking a question like that?  

For today, we'll limit ourselves to your initial question. The leading authority starts its profile as shown:

Jeffrey Rosen (legal academic)  

Jeffrey Rosen (born February 13, 1964) is an American legal scholar, journalist, and author.

Rosen is a law professor at The George Washington University, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) and the author of nine books, including New York Times bestsellers. He served as the President and CEO of the National Constitution Center from 2013 to 2026, where he is now CEO Emeritus. Rosen is a contributing writer for The Atlantic. He was a longtime legal affairs editor of The New Republic and was a staff writer for The New Yorker. He was also a writer for The New York Times Magazine and many other outlets. 

[...]  

Rosen attended the Dalton School, a private college preparatory school on New York City's Upper East Side, and graduated in 1982 as valedictorian. He then studied English literature and government at Harvard University, graduating in 1986 with a Bachelor of Arts, summa cum laude. He was subsequently a Marshall Scholar at Balliol College, Oxford, in philosophy, politics, and economics, from which he received a second bachelor's degree in 1988. He then attended the Yale Law School, where he served as a senior editor of the Yale Law Journal and graduated with a Juris Doctor in 1991.  

He started as one of those "good grades" types, then seemed to mature from there. In our own experienceAttention, C-Span Viewers!he's presented many worthwhile legal forums during his years at the National Constitution Center.

And now, this month-old essay appears.  

As we noted yesterday, President Lincoln wanted to know if a nation like ours could hope to "long endure." In his essay for the Atlantic, Rosen seems to be saying this:   

Maybe not!

Also, can our institutions survive? As you can guess from his the Atllantic's dual headline, Rosen seems to say the answer might be no.   

Why in the world is he saying such things? And in what way might an agitprop pig-pile like The Five be part of the ongoing story?

We think the gentleman's aim is true. Tomorrow, we'll start to explain.   

Tomorrow: Rosen lays out his key points


MONDAY: As you probably may have guessed...

 MONDAY, JULY 6, 2026

With the exception of this morning's report, the Fourth of July continues.

Tomorrow: Who is Jeffrey Rosen?


LONG ENDURE: Can some such nation long endure?

MONDAY, JULY 6, 2026

Jeffrey Rosen's concern: Yesterday, we tried to click our way through the sitting president's speech.

(You can start by clicking here.)   

We refer to his rain-delayed public address of July 4th of this year. Due to the lightning the gods sent down, he wasn't able to start until 11:16 p.m. local Washington D.C. time. When he finally started to speak, the sometimes-invaluable Rev lets us see that he started by saying this:

PRESIDENT TRUMP (7/4/26): Good evening, America! You think that was easy? It wasn't.  

AUDIENCE: Applause  

The president was referring to the chaos of the rain delay. Then, as he proceeded, he tossed out a number--a number he may have made up:   

PRESIDENT TRUMP (continuing directly):   And I want to thank everybody because they did the right thing...

And they estimated they had 375,000 people before everybody had to leave. And they now have 150,000 people. It's the craziest thing anyone's ever seen. At least!

When the president describes some alleged accomplishment or some event, the accomplishment is routinely said to be something "no one has ever seen before." An invented number will often be present, perhaps to be embellished at some later date.   

The initial number may be replaced by an even larger number! And so it went on this occasion, as Mediaite reports

‘422,000 People!’ Trump Makes Wild Claim About Crowd Size at His July 4 Event   

On Sunday, President Donald Trump revised his initial claim that 375,000 people gathered for the America 250 celebration on the National Mall before the crowd was forced to evacuate due to weather.

“We’re here, we’re here, we’re here. There’s no way we can be deterred. They estimated they had 375,000 people before everybody had to leave and they now have 150,000 people. It’s the craziest thing anyone’s ever seen,” Trump said during his speech that began after 11 p.m. Saturday.

Trump revised that [first] number upward on Truth Social Sunday afternoon.  

“The Crowd at 7:05 in the evening was 422,000 people! All were forced to leave because of the weather, the event was cancelled, and everyone was gone because of lightning,” Trump wrote.   

By now, the initial crowd was said to be substantially larger. To peruse the Truth Social post, you can just click here.

Back in real time, back in the actual speech on Saturday night, astounding flattery of us the people quickly began after that. He was flattering us the American people. Here's how the fluffing began:   

PRESIDENT TRUMP (continuing directly from above): And I want to just thank you, and I feel so badly about some people they left, and they couldn't get back. 

But you're very special people, and we have a very special country. Thank you very much.   

Those who stayed were "very special people." That's how the fawning began.   

That might have seemed like a sensible word of thanks directed at loyal followers. But as the president's speech continued, the delusional flattery grew. 

By the time it was 11:18, the president was saying this:  

PRESIDENT TRUMP: For two and a half centuries, our American Republic has stood as the crowning achievement of human history...And we're doing better now than we've ever done before.  

No people have done more good, shown more courage, made more progress, righted more injustice or achieved more greatness than you, the American people.  For 250 years, the United States of America has been the hope, the promise, the light, and the glory among all of the nations of the world. 

All over the world, they try and be like us. Nobody can be like us. And with God's help, we will always be this, or even better.   

Nobody can be [as good as] us, the president had now said. Later, on several occasions, he traveled that road again:   

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Americans must never forget that we are a historic and heroic people with a heroic spirit and a heroic purpose on this beautiful earth of ours.

We are made of the courage and the fire and the flesh and the blood of the best and the bravest people this world has ever produced. We are the bravest and the best.  

Tonight we pledge allegiance to the flag they gave us, and we say, "God bless the immortal patriots of 1776 and long live the cause of independence."  May it reign forever and ever and ever. We will always be on top. We will never let our country fall. We will always be the best. 

"We will always be the best," the president said. As he continued, he turned to this:  

PRESIDENT TRUMP (continuing directly): Our founders not only won our liberty, they secured it with the most righteous political document ever conceived. It's called the Constitution of the United States. Very special.   

And it's because of their genius that we remain the finest people on the planet after 250 years.   

We're the finest people on the planet! So this severely challenged, disordered person now said. 

The people who stayed to watch the speech heard themselves praised in such ways. Much later, the president added the strangest claim he's ever made--the strangest in a fifteen-year public career of extremely strange public assertions:  

PRESIDENT TRUMP: After two and a half centuries, this American republic still stands tall and strong and we love each other.  

Say what? Do we the people love each other? American citizens, please! 

As you can see by clicking this link, we love each other so much that this very same sitting president did this the very next day:   

Trump also posted a doctored picture of ex-President Barack Obama and ex-First Lady Michelle Obama boarding Air Force One; the pic showed “BLM” and Obama’s slogan “Yes We Can” spray painted onto the plane, as well as some Arabic writing. 

Another doctored photo--and how strange! In the rendering posted by the apostle of love, Arabic writing had been spray-painted onto the side of President Obama's Air Force One! 

You can see that post if you click that link. (If you do, you will also read about the latest insults the sitting president has directed at Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister.)

As we've noted, we tried to click our way through the entire July 4 address. Eventually, what we took to be a succession of (tasteless) acts of "stolen valor" persuaded us to stop.    

We thought we were watching extremely tasteless behavior. Presumably, many of our fellow citizens didn't see it that way at all.  

Way back when, President Lincoln almost seemed to wonder if a nation constructed like ours could hope to "long endure." His famous speech started like this:   

PRESIDENT LINCOLN (11/19/1863): Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure...   

That nation has endured, right up to the present day. The population has actually grown, from something like 33 million back then to something like 345 million today.

Lincoln's nation has endured, in the most obvious sense. But in a recent essay for The Atlantic, Jeffrey Rosen suggests the possibility that the nation President Lincoln described may not endure much longer.  

Who the heck is Jeffrey Rosen? And why is he saying such things?  

We think his thesis is very strong. We also think it will be ignored, except right here at this site.   

Tomorrow: Who is Jeffrey Rosen?