WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2026
We don't love Friedman's answer: We Americans! Assuming we escape disaster, we'll need to know how to heal.
What kind of disaster might we face in the two years and two months which follow November's elections? In this morning's New York Times, Thomas Friedman floats an idea.
Headline included, his column starts like this:
Trump Is Going Viral in the Worst Ways
President Trump is such an awful human being that just writing about him feels degrading. What president would denigrate his predecessor in front of China’s leader the way Trump mocked Joe Biden, now suffering from cancer, by pointing out that a framed picture of an autopen was hanging in the White House instead of Biden’s portrait?
Alas, though, when someone as morally warped as Trump—whose first secretary of state called him a “moron”—assumes this much unchecked power at the dawn of the Age of Artificial Intelligence, he can’t be ignored. Because right now Trump is leaving America exposed to dangerous viruses: digital, biological and diplomatic. Something bad is going to happen to us as a result. We and our children are going to pay for this, and not only at the gas pump.
That's the start of the column. Friedman says the current president exposes us, and perhaps the rest of the world, to danger on three fronts—digital, biological and diplomatic.
If anything, we think he understates the global "diplomatic" danger. But the danger is real, and as we type, the sitting president will still be president for the next two years and four months.
Friedman starts with a fairly obvious but very important question. Here it is, once again:
What president would denigrate his predecessor in front of China’s leader the way Trump mocked Joe Biden, now suffering from cancer...
What kind of president would do something like that? Friedman is asking a very basic question. We disagree with his answer.
What kind of president would behave in the ways the sitting president does? Friedman days the president is "morally warped." He says the president is "an awful human being"—so awful that "just writing about him feels degrading."
That isn't the way we'd answer that question. We'd suggest the answer given by the president's niece on CNN, when she spoke with Erin Burnett, earlier this very year. We've posted this many times:
BURNETT (2/26/26): You've known him your whole life. Do you actually see a decline?
MARY L. TRUMP: I do, but I think it's important to remember that Donald has never been fit in any capacity. Obviously, what we're dealing with now are age-related cognitive declines. We're dealing with physical issues that the White House tries to cover over.
But this is somebody who for decades now has had serious, undiagnosed and untreated psychiatric disorders, which are only going to worsen, especially given the pressure he's under and given the cognitive and physical declines.
The president's niece is a doctorate-holding clinical therapist. She told Burnett that her uncle is severely mentally ill and has been so "for decades."
She also said that "obvious cognitive declines" are now layered on top of those earlier conditions.
People like Friedman won't speak that way. Along with a president of the type described by Mary Trump, we have an entire upper-end press corps whose members and orgs have agreed that they will never discuss what seems to be sitting right there before them.
Tomorrow, we may briefly consider Rachel Maddow's latest film. For today, as the analysts return from their various far-flung vacation sites around the world, we will only say this:
We face enormous danger in the years ahead. Our news orgs cling to ancient rules in the face of this situation.
If we avoid disaster, the tribalized state of our society will force us to seek a way to heal. Carl Sandburg imagined one possible source of healing at the end of Abraham Lincoln: The Prairie Years. His highly poetic suggestion appears as the president-elect travels to rural Coles County, Illinois, for his final visit with his stepmother, Sally Bush (Sarah Bush Lincoln).
In the last few weeks, we've been thinking about that passage from Sandburg's famous biography. Yesterday morning, we showed you the way the passage begins.
Before the week is done, we'll show you where it goes next.
Tomorrow: Maddow goes true crime?