FRIDAY, MAY 8, 2026
Three medical experts agree: This is no country for rational discourse.
We've complimented Adam Kirsch for announcing that rarely acknowledged fact. He recently did so in The Atlantic.
At this point, we link to his essay for the third and final time:
IDEAS
The Era of Rational Discourse Is Over
For Jürgen Habermas, who died in March, the essence of democracy was thoughtful back-and-forth argument.
It would be hard to argue with Kirsch's principal thesis—unless you argue, as a sane person might, that no era of rational discourse ever existed to start with.
If some such era did exist, that era has plainly ended. We'll start today with something we saw, just yesterday, on this nation's most-watched "cable news" program.
As a TV show, it's a smash hit. Airing at 5 p.m. each weekday, its audience is almost three times the size of the audience watching MS NOW's Deadline: White House in the same time slot.
Yesterday, the election for Los Angeles mayor came under discussion on this Fox News Channel program. Here's the overview from the leading authority about one of the top three contenders:
Nithya Raman
Nithya V. Raman (born July 28, 1981) is an American urban planner, activist, and politician serving as the Los Angeles city councilmember for the 4th district since 2020. Raman, a member of the Democratic Party and the Democratic Socialists of America, defeated incumbent councilmember David Ryu in 2020 and was re-elected in 2024.
[...]
Raman was born into a Tamil family in Kerala, India, and moved to Louisiana at 6 years old. She earned a bachelor's degree in political theory from Harvard University then a master's degree in urban planning from MIT.
After living in the United States for many years, Raman returned to her home country of India and founded the research firm Transparent Chennai. The firm's goal was to improve sanitation in the city of Chennai. In 2013, Raman moved to Los Angeles and worked for the city administrative officer of Los Angeles. In 2017, Raman founded and headed SELAH Neighborhood Homeless Coalition, a homelessness outreach nonprofit in Los Angeles; she also served as the executive director of Time's Up Entertainment. Raman became a naturalized American citizen at the age of 22.
Back then, she was 22. Today, she's 44. Would she be a capable mayor? We have no idea!
On its face, Raman's resume seems impressive. But here's what millions of people were told about the impending mayoral election when the garbage can was opened yesterday afternoon and a cast of Unrecognizables suddenly appeared on their screens:
WATTERS (5/7/26): The one woman, [incumbent mayor] Karen Bass, is like, "You know what? We did a great job with the fire."
Are you kidding me? It's like Biden saying the border is secure! And then you have this "Raman"—rhymes with noodle—whatever her name is.
That's what this silly child actually said. Fumbling with the candidate's name, he had produced a wonderful play on the familiar supermarket product!
Three hours later, he went there again, on his own "cable news" program:
WATTERS (5/7/26): L.A.'s no bueno. You see it and smell it. Karen Bass says, "Just keep your eyes forward and your nose closed.
Nithya Raman, like the noodle, says, "Smell? What smell?"
Yes, he said it again! But so it goes within a society whose major figures, Red and Blue, have agreed that we will no longer try to be a country for rational discourse.
(David French won't discuss this journalistic squalor. Neither will David Brooks, or Joe or Mika, or Rachel Maddow. No one at The Atlantic is going to say the names of these Fox News figures. Under current agreements, Corporate Red churns this garbage out, and Corporate Blue defers.)
Remarkably, Corporate Red has made Watters the most-watched "personality" in American "cable news." Sitting in the program's equivalent of the center square, he anchors The Five at 5 p.m. He then hosts his own show, Jesse Watters Primetime, three hours later.
The Five is this nation's most-watched "cable news" show. Watters Primetime is second most-watched, and it's not real far behind.
Gutfeld! comes on at 10 o'clock, 7 p.m. on the coast. Last night's program started with a familiar insinuation—the insinuation that Hillary Clinton killed Jeffrey Epstein. That's just how this train wreck rolls.
It rhymes with noodle, today's Cronkite said. But then, this is no country for rational discourse, as Adam Kirsch noted.
In all candor, this is no nation for such discourse even when large news orgs try. Such attempts aren't always successful, of course. But on May 5, in print editions, the New York Times did in fact tackle a relevant topic.
For the third time in less than two years, an assassination attempt—or perhaps an attempt at such an attempt—had been aimed at President Trump.
If you watch The Five, you now see Gutfeld insist, on a nightly basis, that political violence only emerges from people on "the left."
His ability to wish contrary examples away takes us the border of stone-cold mental disorder. But on May 5, Linda Qiu published a detailed report on this general subject. We call attention to one claim which appeared in her report:
The Facts on Political Violence and Threats to Presidents
A gunman’s breach of a Washington hotel where President Trump had gathered with hundreds of journalists over the weekend has reignited the debate over which political faction is more violent and which faces more threats.
[...]
An analysis in September of terrorist attacks from the 1990s through July 2025 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank, found a similar trend: Right-wing terrorist attacks outpaced left-wing attacks from the 1990s to 2024. But, the analysis noted, 2025 was the first time in 30 years in which left-wing attacks outnumbered far-right attacks. That finding remained true through the end of 2025, the authors of the analysis said in an interview.
But they cautioned that it can be difficult to categorize the motivations of attackers as right wing or left wing. Many perpetrators have mental health issues, with indecipherable motives or conflicting beliefs. Attackers may also be driven by personal animus or a desire to seek fame, not necessarily a political goal.
Really? People who ride choo-choo trains across the country in hopes of shooting government officials will often "have mental health issues?" Who would have imagined that something like that could possibly be the case?
Setting aside everything else in Qiu's report, who could have imagined that? Certainly not the medical experts who soon popped up on our TV programs, eager to let us know that, even as the nation disintegrates, The Doctors are (very much) IN.
As we noted yesterday, the first experts to speak up were Doctors Watters and Gutfeld. Less than 48 hours after the Correspondents Dinner event, here's what these messengers said:
DR. WATTERS (4/27/26): What makes it so dangerous is these assassins are smarter. These aren't like low-IQ lunatics. If you look at the people that have targeted the president and other Republicans, it's not like they're hearing voices and are disassociated from reality. These are well-educated people who are politically involved.
[...]The Democratic Party has become a violent revolutionary movement...Trump keeps kicking their butt, and they can't do anything about it. He's pursuing an ambitious America First agenda. So because they're powerless, what they're doing is inspiring their base to violently overthrow the government.
DR. GUTFELD (4/27/26): This guy was not a crank. He's not deranged. Don't buy into that narrative, because it lets these pompous asses off.He didn't do this because, as Jesse said— He didn't have voices in his head. He was just following orders. He was operating on a filter that said Trump was Hitler and it would be immoral if you didn't take Hitler out.
DR. MAHER (5/1/26): This guy wasn’t crazy crazy. Like, you know, the dog wasn’t talking to him, and the moon. He just was, like, watching the—TETT: Social media.MAHER: Yeah, and media media!TETT: And media media, yeah.
This is no country for rational discourse.
I suppose that if I wasted as much time watching Fox "news" as Somerby does, then Bill Maher would start looking like a genius in comparison.
ReplyDeleteSomerby has trapped himself inside a right wing echo chamber and is oddly looking to blame others for his circumstance, irrationally placing fault with “Blues”.
Delete"Would she be a capable mayor? We have no idea! "
ReplyDeleteWhy would Somerby have no idea? Raman has an impressive bio of addressing intransigent problems in Los Angeles, along with the training to do that job. Why wouldn't she do well taking on more responsibility?
Dissing people this way is a pattern in Somerby's writing, especially when discussing women who aspire to important jobs. It is a diss when someone has a stellar background of solid achievement but Somerby can only dither in his wishy washy tone about whether they might be competent.
If someone said Somerby's words in a letter of recommendation for a job application, readers would assume he dislikes the person but was required to write a letter. That same attitude comes across here, accompanied by no explanation that would explain his reticence.
Then Somerby quotes Watters, who actively dislikes her, dismissing her by mocking her name and calling Los Angeles smelly. Raman is a Democrat so she gets the mistreatment handed out by these right wingers to anyone left (despite Los Angeles being in a blue state and full of blue voters). She is apparently the next Mamdani.
When Somerby repeats Watters' complaints about Raman, he furthers them, exposing them to a wider audience via his own blog. Note that Somerby does nothing to address the unfairness of those attacks on Raman. He does not defend her or even point out why she is being attacked.
Somerby does point out that Watters' discourse is not thoughtful. Neither is Somerby's. If Somerby were liberal, as he has claimed, he would underline the unfairness of Watters' attack on Raman, who is obviously qualified to run for mayor of Los Angeles. Instead he withholds enthusiasm and complains daintily about Watters' silliness over smelliness and noodles, while advancing his words.
When Trump retweets a meme, photo or Q-Anon diatribe, he is doing so in order to further the impact of those creations. He is endorsing them. For a long time, Republican politicians had a standard practice of never mentioning their opponents names. Trump takes this further and creates nicknames for his enemies, such Tampon Tim, and pretending Kamala's name was unpronounceable. Obama was Hussein, and still is whenever Trump speaks of him. Watters continues that trend, which is a political tactic, not a form of irrationality as Somerby frames it, using Habermas as his excuse. If Somerby cannot tell a political attack from any kind of discourse, Somerby is majorly impaired as a media analyst.
Somerby's "retweeting" and echoing of Watters' attack on Raman, an up and coming Democrat in a major blue state, is the problem here. Not anything to do with discourse. Somerby knows what he is doing and he does it anyway, while claiming to be "one of us," which he manifestly is not. That makes him a big fat liar, the salient trait of all right wingers.
And Somerby luvs that he can disparage another twofer, a lefty politician who is both brown-skinned and female, not just a highly qualified expert in the kind of problems Los Angeles is working hard to fix.
Yea that shit really bothers me. Somerby notes she is an incredibly well prepared person for the job, then does the no idea if qualified bullshit; and repeatedly lobs Raman. Lot of times I think Somerby critics go too far. But today?, fuck him.
Delete“Somerby notes she is an incredibly well prepared person for the job, then does the no idea if qualified bullshit…”
DeleteHe didn’t say he has no idea if she’s qualified, he made sure to include her qualifications in his post. He said "Would she be a capable mayor? We have no idea!” To me, this seems a reasonable observation. You can’t know until the Mayor-elect has an actual record as a mayor.
“Why wouldn't she do well taking on more responsibility?” is plaintively asked by 12:04, an almost juvenile question, but Somerby never even made that claim. 12:04 (I’m being polite today) operates in bad faith. Don’t fool yourself. And here’s why I say this.
They often begin their argument with the unstated premise “Somerby is a misogynist.” Then they then pick over every little thing Somerby says to “demonstrate” why this is true, in their conspiracy-addled way. (Secretly, Somerby hates women. Everything he writes is somehow slyly denigrating them.) Then this gem:
“Somerby's "retweeting" and echoing of Watters' attack on Raman, an up and coming Democrat in a major blue state, is the problem here.” This is another constant refrain from this interlocutor, that Somerby is a secret right-winger, trying to hide his bona fides (from whom, we are never told) whilst “retweeting” rightwing propaganda. Goddamn, he was just discussing it, and clearly finds Watters a detestable media figure. How is this not plain?
I could go on, but nah. How does one even argue, in good faith, with such drivel? It’s la-la land shit. Their entire comment is like this. I almost sailed past 12:04, but sometimes…
Leroy
Splitting hairs on qualified vs. capable is BS Leroy.
DeleteRaman has a track record working to address difficult problems in LA, such as homelessness and she has also worked within the system. Somerby ignores that when he says he doesn't know if she would be a good mayor. Why?
DeleteLeroy has no idea if Somerby isn't a Right-wing piece of shit, just because he repeats Right-wing nonsense.
DeleteSomerby throws up his hands like this, with an explanation point, on a very regular basis , and it adds nothing to the content of his post. A good editor would delete this annoying crap.
DeleteLeroy, there’s no reasoning with her. If you point out her obvious errors, she’ll deflect and distract, but never admit. (I’m not qualified to say, but I believe we’re witnessing the playing out of some pathology. Why else would she devote her life to writing these endless screeds?)
DeleteWhat I find more interesting is the phenomenon of the Mini-Me grouplet, the “Well said” and “Agree” Greek chorus. I think it reflects some kind of perverse solidarity of sisterhood. It’s the kind of perverse solidarity which turns an odious person such as Stormy Daniels into a feminist heroine.
It could be worse.
DeleteYou could actually believe Somerby is trying to make some kind of point with the typing he does on TDH.
I think he is making the points that Hating on the Other and Ignoring Red Propaganda are mistakes that lead to poor political outcomes for Blues.
DeleteUnfortunately, Somerby's larded prose---littered with Right-wing talking points, his "anything is possible" reasoning, and lack of explanation of why those talking points are bullshit, makes it hard for some readers to think your theory holds any water.
DeleteSomerby sopped telling us to listen to the Others, once we reported back they are nothing but racists, pissed off that people other than white men were given agency.
DeleteI certainly agree that some readers don’t understand Somerby’s message, but I would put the blame on their poor reading comprehension skills rather than on Somerby’s prose style.
Delete12:51 - A timely example of Hating on the Other. And then we wonder, cluelessly, why the Others keep voting for Red politicians.
DeleteI don’t wonder cluelessly, Dog. I actually have been listening to them. You have to be an idiot to think your theory of why they support that orange abomination makes any sense.
DeleteWhere is it written that everyone must engage in rational discourse or Habermas is wrong and our democracy is dead? This is Somerby's strawman. If Watters and Gutfeld are not rational, then none of us can be, Somerby claims.
ReplyDeleteAnd Somerby seems to believe that all wrongdoing is caused by insanity, castigating Gutfeld, Watters and Tett and Maher because they disagree with him and proclaim Allen the victim of social media cultism, not mental illness. Somerby has no training or basis for saying that, but he thinks all of rational discourse rests on this question and is willing to throw out Habermas' body of work on that basis.
Somerby is a huge asshole who couldn't reason his way out of a paper bag.
Pretty much.
DeleteTalk about reasoning oneself out of a paper bag! Somerby never claims that no one can be rational if Watters and Gutfeld aren’t. That’s pure bonkers. And then you go on to criticize what Somerby “seems” to believe? Please!
DeleteCorrect.
DeleteSomery's repeating of Watters and Gutfeld's Right-wing nonsense every day, doesn't mean the literally hundreds of thousands of rational commenters Somerby ignores at the same time aren't rational.
Name one female Democrat who Somerby has ever expressed admiration of or support for.
ReplyDeleteSomerby admires right wing pundits that offer genteel versions of racism, sexism, and xenophobia. They’re not Democrats, nor female, but they are effete. About as close as he comes to a female Dem. To be fair, female Dems have little personal interest in losers like Somerby, although they do fight for things that would improve his life.
DeleteHe's big on Mary Trump.
DeleteOnly because she agrees with him about attributing Trump's insanity to his abuse as a child. Somerby is confirming his personal theories, not learning anything from others about what is wrong with Trump or our society.
DeleteThere's big difference between which political faction is more violent. The left is the party of hate.
ReplyDeleteIf you look at actual political violence and assassinations, liberals have indeed committed more than conservatives. But, if you look at reactions to the violence, the difference is extreme. Hundreds of thousands publicly celebrated Charlie Kirk's murder. Heaven knows how many talk about Trump being killed. Luigi Nicholas Mangione is a hero to many. There is no conservative analogue.
Nope, still a dope.
DeleteGo fuck yourself, dickheaf
Delete"Radley Balko
Delete@radleybalko.bsky.social
We've reached the point where one party has so obliterated the rule of law that everyone else continuing to abide by it will only hasten the end of our democracy.
That's a recipe for chaos and violence. It's terrifying, and I don't know what we do about it.
May 8, 2026 at 9:56 AM"
You think that this is awesome, don't you David? A Nazi's dream come true in America.
D in C, you are completely off the rails. Our own Potus, who you constantly obsequiously defend, while deflecting and ignoring his extreme flaws, calls dem politicians traitors, fascists, communists, they should be in jail, says they hate our country, brings idiotic law suits, it's a tidal wave of hate, coming from our president. there's never been anything like it.
DeleteYet again, despite Somerby trying to point out the nonsense of this type of irrational discourse, DiC is here yet again to amplify the Fox/trump/gop message. Does anyone think the magat dic’s of the world can be reached if only the mainstream media would expose Gutfeld and Watters?
DeleteTo add to AC’s list, Trump called his opponents “vermin” as well.
Delete“ Hundreds of thousands publicly celebrated Charlie Kirk's murder.”
DeleteThis is such patent bullshit.
The Charlie Kirk haters celebrated with the 911 American hating Muslims in New Jersey. It was all over the news. I am sure David can name names of prominent Democrats who celebrated Kirk's death, right asshole David?
DeleteThe one person that clearly celebrates Kirk's death is his widow.
DeleteThere may be some who think of Mangione as a hero. They may hold leftist political beliefs by and large. Buy that doesn’t typify the Democratic Party. Nick Fuentes is an anti semite and white supremacist (who dined with Trump at mar-a-lago, by the way), but I assume you don’t feel that he represents the mainstream of the Republican Party, even though he has over a million followers, eh, DiC?
Delete*buy = but
DeleteOf course a bigot like Fuentes is a perfect representative of the Republican Party.
DeleteAnyone who isn’t gaslighting liar, who hates Democracy, like Somerby, admits to that truth.
Hate, violence, and mental illness define the left.
DeleteSqueal louder, snowflake at 11:37.
DeleteEveryone should have the opportunity to laugh at you and your cry-babying.
According to government officials, about 75% of political violence comes from the right.
ReplyDeleteFor example, it was a White male Republican gun enthusiast that shot up that rally in Butler, PA.
It was a White male gun enthusiast groyper - a far right wing cohort - that supposedly shot Kirk.
It was a White male gun toting Republican that hid out at that golf course Trump visited in a sudden and unannounced change in his schedule.
Most Americans think the event at the WHCD was staged, and now also are generally suspicious that the Butler event was staged as well, and that Kirk was assassinated by Israel.
These suspicions arise because details of those events do not add up. For example there is video of Cole Allen at the WHCD where you can plainly see he never fired a shot.
Republicans love to talk about prominent Democrats getting killed - Clinton, Biden, etc, and notably seemed quite gleeful when those MN legislators were murdered by a Republican loon.
Is there anything more hilarious than Pelosi's husband getting his skull fractured by a right wing thug with a hammer? In the middle of the night in his underwear? Probably a gay lover spat. You know, S.F. after all. Fucking hilarious I tells you. The jokes write themselves.
DeleteThis isn’t going to end well. It cannot go on forever where its heads they win, tails we lose.
DeleteOne of David in Cal's best predictions is that the Left will be so violent towards Right-wingers for their fascism, they won't care how many people on the Right they send to the guillotines.
DeleteBREAKING: Islamic Terrorist Regime IS DUMPING OIL INTO THE SEA! 🚨
ReplyDeleteAs we warned: the regime has run out of storage capacity.
For days now, they’ve been faking tanker transfers while pouring massive amounts of extracted oil straight into the ocean.
Deliberate. Criminal. Environmental catastrophe.
They are literally poisoning the sea.
This is ecocide in real time.
The regime in Iran is totally evil.
What is the root cause of this totally evil oil dump you dumb ass? The President and all his men being dumb fucks without a coherent war plan before starting this cluster duck just may be it, Capeesh dumb ass?
DeleteGo take a flying fuck, dickhead
DeleteOne approach is to kowtow to bullies. That doesn't work in the long term.
DeleteThe Iranian regime is willing to commit ecocide, so we should give in to their demands. Under this cowardly approach, the most ruthless side wins.
https://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/poem/poems_danegeld.htm
We're dealing with the same sort of bullying on the Strait of Hormuz. Does the world allow Ukraine to effectively take ownership of the Strait of Hormuz -- an international waterway?
DeleteTotally brave Commander Bone Spurs puts Putin ahead of our soldiers lives. Trump always kowtows to Putin, his lifelong bully. Trump is a wimp who puts his riches ahead of all of us, and especially the suckers and losers who are dumb enough to enlist.
Delete"According to The Economist, citing a Russian document, Russia is considering supplying Iran with thousands of fiber-optic FPV drones along with training for their use against American forces."
Explain this, Trump comment David. He is a fucking traitor and you love him for it don't you?
Delete"Trump, speaking aboard Air Force One as he traveled to Miami, stopped short of confirming the reports but dismissed their significance. "If you take a look at what's happened to Iran in the last week, if they're getting information, it's not helping them much," he said. When asked whether Russian assistance would affect his view of the bilateral relationship, Trump drew a comparison to U.S. intelligence support for Ukraine: "They'd say we do it against them. Wouldn't they say that we do it against them?""
Republicans hate American Democracy and all it stands for. Filth.
So, what do you think the US should do, @1:17?
DeleteImpeach the traitor to American Democracy after we trounce the hateful dumb bitch this November.
DeleteYou like the word “evil” don’t you, DiC?
DeleteWhat I would do is, is threaten to blow Iran off the face of the earth, multiple times, infinitely. That ought to do it. President I-can-identify-a-squirrel-and-that-makes-me-a-genius has that covered.
DeleteWe had no cards and lost this excursion on Day 1. Expect we will be paying restitution to Iran for decades. So much belligerent stupid like the world has never seen before. Sad. And all this losing just months after we, per the loser Trump, had "totally obliterated" their nuke program. Bunch of dumb traitors to American Democracy stupidly trying to tell the world who is boss without even adapting for drone warfare. Have these dumb asses learned that Ukraine is putting it to Putin's criminal invasion thru superior drone warfare? Morans and weirdos, the whole lot of them. Putin has as many cards as clueless Trump. Zero.
DeleteSo light it on fire. That might make them stop. And if doesn't, well then, that's their problem isn't it?
Delete1:34 - only when it's applied to the Libs.
Delete"Does the world allow Ukraine to effectively take ownership of the Strait of Hormuz"
DeleteExcuse me? Did you just mix up Iran and Ukraine?
Good catch, Quaker.
DeleteNope, still a dope David.
DeleteAll I can say is Iran better agree to the latest proposal--or else!
DeleteIt becomes more clear every day that Iran should have been destroyed DECADES ago. Thank God for President Trump.
DeleteSay what you will about Republican voters, but you can't say they don't thank God for child rapists.
DeleteIran's brutal, deological regime has hardened during this war and become more brutal and more ideological.
DeleteThank God for President Trump!
Would that be before or after President Reagan gave the mullahs missiles?
Delete1:34. Yeah he likes the word evil. He applied it, not long ago, to Obama, and now argues here that Democrats are the guilty party in demonizing political figures.
DeleteIf we are lucky, after a few more hundred billion taxpayer dollars, a couple dozen more dead soldiers, the straight will be open with no nuke deal. With Iran now knowing it can be the world's biggest bitch with cheap little drones not nukes. USA! USA! USA! Elected a fucking idiot who surrounded himself with fucking fools.
DeleteThe Iranians have hit at least 18 US military targets, destroying buildings and killing soldiers, since the war started. NYT reporters had to go to European countries’ satellite imagery to confirm Iranian photos, since the liars in charge of this war have blocked US satellite photos from being accessed. Without a vigilant press we would know only what Trump, Hegseth and their ilk propagandize.
DeleteBut don’t you dare care the party of free speech “fascists”
DeleteMeanwhile, back in reality, Iran is still getting shipments of oil out to other countries. For example, China has received over 12 million barrels in recent weeks from Iran.
ReplyDeleteComplete fucking destuctive idiots and weirdos:
ReplyDeleteCatherine Rampell
"The Trump administration is proudly shelling out almost $2 billion in exchange for agreements from developers to halt wind projects that were already in the works. These projects—wind farms off the coasts of New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and California—would have generated enough electricity to power roughly 3-4 million households once they came online.
What pot of taxpayer money this payoff comes from, and whether the payoffs are even legal, remain open questions. Even lawmakers don’t know the answers...
Dozens of other renewable energy projects around the country have not received the same—forgive me—windfall. Instead, they’ve been canceled, stalled, or quietly snuffed out, with zero compensation. The list includes a gargantuan solar project in Nevada and more than 150 wind developments around the country, which collectively could have powered around 15 million homes.2 As a Heatmap headline declared: “Trump is getting away with murdering an American industry.”
Renewables are hardly Trump’s only victim. Our president is basically an economic serial killer, whacking firms left and right...
Just over a year into his second term, the economic landscape is littered with victims mangled by Trump’s agenda. Corporate bankruptcies last year rose to their highest level in over a decade. So join me, friends, for a stroll through the ‘America First’ Corporate Graveyard."
Who the fuck supports taxpayer dollars to destroy corporate profits from producing clean energy?
Someone who is being blackmailed by Putin to do so.
Delete2 million in taxpayer dollars to halt projects aimed at making the US less oil dependent. Makes perfect sense in the world of a troll like DiC.
DeleteYou mean billions
DeleteYes
DeleteFrom Digby: CIA analysts have assessed that the Iranians can go 3-4 months in this stalemate without suffering greater consequences. And analysts are indicating that despite Trump’s statements that the Iranians have lost all but 18% of their missiles, they retain roughly 75% of their launchers and 70% of their missiles. The American public is constantly lied to by this regime.
ReplyDeleteAs Democrats, we have to make sure our next presidential nominee is not a black woman or a white woman. People prefer presidents to be men.
ReplyDeleteNope, still a dope.
DeleteWhat is that supposed to mean?
DeleteI believe 11:12 is referring to America's strategic reserves of misogyny.
DeleteLike pilots and surgeons.
DeleteBob should be in a good mood. Judge ruled $750M Newsom lawsuit against Fox/the juvenile Waters can proceed. Hope he nails the fuckers good even though I think he has a bit of Newscum in him.
ReplyDeleteThe problem with Newsom is he's funded by the Getty's, so he will support the status quo of billionaires running the country/ world.
DeleteThe problem with Fox is that it is the propaganda arm of a political party which is dedicated to white supremacy.
With new redistricting blocking Democrat cheating it's looking like a bloodbath for Democrats in November.
ReplyDeleteRemember back when accepting election results was a thing?
DeleteTry telling your children about it, and they look at you like you're telling them gas used to cost 29 cents a gallon when you were young.
storm beretta m9a4
ReplyDeleteglock 17 gen 3
glock 17 gen 4
glock 17
glock 19