MyPillow, Overstock fail to relent!

FRIDAY, JULY 26, 2024

True Belief marches on: The news report appeared online on July 20, in the New York Times. 

It provides the germ of an anthropology lesson, but also a lesson in logic. For starters, the news report ran beneath this dual headline:

The Voting Machine Conspiracy Theorists Are Still at It
Patrick Byrne, Mike Lindell and other Trump supporters who made baseless assertions that Dominion Voting Systems rigged the 2020 election are using court cases to keep spreading lies about the company.

Those are the headlines atop the report. Here are the first four paragraphs:

Nearly four years later, zealous supporters of former President Donald J. Trump who promoted the conspiracy theory that Dominion Voting Systems had rigged its machines to rob him of the 2020 election are still at it.

Even though Dominion has aggressively defended itself in court, a network of pro-Trump activists has continued to push false claims against the company, often by seeking to use information gleaned from the very defamation lawsuits the firm has filed against them.

The network includes wealthy business executives like Patrick Byrne, who once ran Overstock.com, and Mike Lindell, the founder of the bedding company MyPillow. Both have sought without credible evidence to put Dominion at the heart of a vast conspiracy to deny Mr. Trump a victory.

It also includes a pro-Trump sheriff from southwest Michigan, a former election official from Colorado and Mr. Byrne’s own lawyer, who is facing charges of tampering with Dominion machines and who once worked alongside Mr. Trump’s legal team in claiming that the company was part of a plot to subvert the last election.

Remarkably, Lindell and Byrne "are still at it." Joined by a pro-Trump sheriff and a former official, they continue to pound away at the machinations of Dominion Voting Systems.

We'll recommend two approaches to the material we've posted. Thew first approach involves a collection of somewhat related terms. In order of appearance, the terms in question are these:

Baseless assertions
Lies
False claims
[The absence of] credible evidence

You can even add "conspiracy theory." Our notes would go like this:

Presumably, a "baseless assertion" will generally resemble an assertion which is made in the absence of "credible evidence." One question would go like this:

How does a "baseless assertion" differ from a "false claim?"

Moving right along:

Presumably, every "lie" will involve a "false claim." On what basis can we assert that a "false claim" is a "lie?"

Also and even this:

Can a "baseless assertion" turn out to be true? How about a "conspiracy theory?" In the face of such complexifications, we always think of Gene Brabender, the 20th century's greatest anthropologist. As recorded by Jim Bouton, his most famous remark went like this:

Where I come from, we only talk so long. After that, we start to hit.

Those questions stem from the old puzzler, "What's in a word?" Now we turn to a different set of ruminations:

Is it possible? Is it possible that Lindell and Byrne still believe that the last election was somehow stolen by something done by Dominion? 

Is it possible that they actually believe some such thing? That they therefore aren't actually "lying?"

We don't know how to answer that question. We'd love to see journalists speak to medical / psychological specialists about such matters. That said, if history has taught us anything, it teaches that they're likely to speak to the Easter Bunny first.

Full disclosure! We've all been exposed to a major anthropological lesson over the past dozen years. The apparent lesson is this:

Especially in highly fraught circumstances, you can get a whole lot of people to believe almost any damn fool thing. 

With that, one last question comes to mind:

Is it possible that a nutcase like Donald J. Trump is actually one of those people? Is it possible that he actually believes the baseless assertions he makes?

Full disclosure: As we noted this morning, we studied under Professor N. That's probably why we're so sharp.

THE REVOLT: Submission grappling promoter expounds!

FRIDAY, JULY 26, 2024

The tools do this every night: Who in the world is Chael Sonnen? 

Below, we'll start to answer your question, possibly for the second time. First though, riddle us this:

Who the heck was José  Ortega y Gasset? Also, what did he say in his most famous book, The Revolt of the Masses? It's a book whose intriguing title has lately been troubling our dreams.

Did we ever read The Revolt of the Masses? If so, it would likely have been in our sophomore year in college. 

We prospective philosophy majors had all fled the department after taking Phil 3 from a certain 25-year-old professor. We ourselves spent a year in exile in European History & Lit. 

As for Ortega y Gasset, we finally decided to look him up after watching Sonnen last night. The leading authority on his life tells us this:

 José Ortega y Gasset

José Ortega y Gasset (1883 – 1955) was a Spanish philosopher and essayist. He worked during the first half of the 20th century while Spain oscillated between monarchy, republicanism, and dictatorship. His philosophy has been characterized as a "philosophy of life" that "comprised a long-hidden beginning in a pragmatist metaphysics inspired by William James, and with a general method from a realist phenomenology imitating Edmund Husserl, which served both his proto-existentialism (prior to Martin Heidegger's) and his realist historicism, which has been compared to both Wilhelm Dilthey and Benedetto Croce."

Good lord! Apparently, though, one author did say that, though only once, in a book. 

Moving right along, what about that alleged revolt? Here's part of the way the authority thumbnails Ortega's most famous book:

The Revolt of the Masses

The Revolt of the Masses (Spanish: La rebelión de las masas) is a book by José Ortega y Gasset. It was first published as a series of articles in the newspaper El Sol in 1929, and as a book in 1930; the English translation, first published two years later, was authorized by Ortega.

[...]

In this work, Ortega traces the genesis of the "mass-man" and analyzes his constitution, en route to describing the rise to power and action of the masses in society. Ortega is throughout quite critical of both the masses and the mass-men of which they are made up, contrasting "noble life and common life" and excoriating the barbarism and primitivism he sees in the mass-man.

He does not, however, refer to specific social classes, as has been so commonly misunderstood in the English-speaking world. Ortega states that the mass-man could be from any social background, but his specific target is the bourgeois educated man, the señorito satisfecho (satisfied young man, or Mr. Satisfied), the specialist who believes he has it all and extends the command he has of his subject to others, contemptuous of his ignorance in all of them.

You can make of such things what you will. The authority includes this excerpt from Chapter 8 of Ortega's once-famous text:

The Fascist and Syndicalist species were characterized by the first appearance of a type of man who "did not care to give reasons or even to be right," but who was simply resolved to impose his opinions. That was the novelty: the right not to be right, not to be reasonable: "the reason of unreason."

— Chapter 8, "Why the Masses Intervene in Everything and Why They Always Intervene Violently"

You can make of that what you will. Also, you can look up "syndicalism" yourself. 

For the record, Ortega never had the chance to watch American "cable news." He never watched a single program on our flailing nation's "cable news" channels. 

He never got to do that! Had he watched the Fox News Channel last night, he ould have seen the aforementioned Sonnen—the person you see thumbnailed below—presented asc some sort of political analyst.

Below, we'll tell you how it went. Here is Sonnen's thumbnail:

Chael Sonnen

Chael Sonnen (born April 3, 1977) is an American submission grappling promoter, mixed martial arts (MMA) analyst, and retired mixed martial artist. Beginning his MMA career in 1997, Sonnen competed for the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), where he became a top contender in both the light heavyweight and middleweight divisions and challenged for both the UFC Light Heavyweight and UFC Middleweight Championships. Sonnen has also fought in World Extreme Cagefighting, Pancrase, and most recently for Bellator MMA. Sonnen is often considered one of the best mixed martial artists never to have won a major MMA world championship and one of the sport's greatest trash-talkers.

In 2014, Sonnen began working as a MMA analyst for ESPN and two years later, in July 2016, founded Submission Underground (SUG), his own submission grappling promotion.

We're omitting the passage about the incident in the Las Vegas hotel corridor back in 2021. As best we can tell, the attendant lawsuits continue.

In short, Sonnen is a "submission grappling promoter" and a former mixed martial artist. Last night, in his latest appearance on Fox, he was also cast as a political / social analyst.

To our eye and ear, he came across last night as an extremely speedy, somewhat borderline possible semi-nutcase. 

Needless to say, he appeared on the Gutfeld! program. Last evening, this was the panel of analysts:

Gutfeld! panel: Thursday, July 25, 2024
Chael Sonnen: Submission grappling promoter. 
Tyrus: Former professional wrestling champion. Performs as a comedian.
Kat Timpf: Performs as a comedian.
Jamie Lissow: Performs as a comedian. 
Greg Gutfeld (host): 59 years old. Performs as a comedian. 

So it went! Three comedians, joined by one former professional wrestler and one submission grappling promoter. This collection had been assembled to spend an hour, in primetime, conducting political and cultural analyses on our struggling nation's most-watched "cable news" channel.

"Revolt of the masses," someone once said. Not that there's anything wrong with it! 

In fairness, we also thought of Ortega's book title when we watched the first hour of Fox & Friends this morning. In our view, MSNBC is bad enough, but something resembling that alleged revolt seems to take place on the Fox News Channel during quite a few hours each day.

Last night, Sonnen had been deposited in the chair occupied this past Monday night by a 23-yea-old model and actress who has recently begun to "dabble in political commentary." This is the way the clown car rolls on this particular "cable news" channel, as our nation seems to seek a way to follow behind "sacred Troy."

Last night, Sonnen struck us as someone who may have ingested seven or eight too many Red Bulls before the taping began. You can assess his first presentation simply by clicking here

(For the record, he seems to think the vice president's first name is "Kuh-MALL"—two syllables only.)

In the modern lexicon, what happens on this nightly, primetime "news" show might be described as the revolt of the flyweights—but also, of course, as the recitation of the corporate tools.

The analysts all know what to say, and they all proceed to say it. Everyone recites the views of the corporate entity signing their checks. 

They all know what they're paid to say, and they seem eager to say it. (We can't say that MSNBC totally differs from this.)

You can watch Sonnen by clicking that link. That said, we've been discussing the Monday night Gutfeld! show, and we'll return to that debacle as we finish our report.

More specifically, we'll look at the "conspiracy theories" which were possibly whispered that night as the assortment of jugglers and clowns recited the scripts of their paymaster. Indeed, a person could almost think that it started with Gutfeld himself. 

He had started that evening's program by wondering if Hunter Biden will now start "dating" the first lady. (On Tuesday evening's show, his altered his presentation. His verb of choice was now "f*cking.")

He started with the "dating." After that, the rage-infested fellow explained how to pronounce the Vice President's name.

It isn't KAHMA-ala, he helpfully said. The pronunciation is "IDIOT."

This rage-infested corporate tool is 59 years old! We each went to high school right there in San Mateo—we ourselves at Aragon High, he at Tom Brady's Serra.

We can't imagine how a person so filled with rage can emerge from such a sunny land. But if some such "mass man" does so emerge, the Fox News Channel will find him!

Back to those possibly whispered conspiracy theories. Did the rage-filled host kick-start the fun? At 10:07 p.m., on Monday night, the termagant offered this:

GUTFELD (7/22/24): Now, there could be something else going on here. Is there more to Joe dropping out than we know? Does it have something to do with Butler, Pennsylvania? 

I'm not suggesting the Dems tried to have Trump killed, of course...

But remember. Secret Service Director Cheatle was on Jill Biden's security detail. Jill reportedly pushed for Cheatle to get that top job. 

They're a perfect pair—a DEI hire gets a shot, and a phony doctor can give you first aid. 

But what if, when resources are allotted, favorites are played with experience and manpower? It's pretty clear that the White House didn't take threats to Trump seriously. Could this have been negligence by derangement—a shared antipathy for Trump?

So it went, as he struggled to avoid suggesting that the Dems tried to have Trump killed. He was merely asking—asking if President Biden's withdrawal from the campaign had something to do with what happened in Butler that day.

The termagant never doubled back to explain what he meant by that question. In fairness, he instantly said he wasn't suggesting that the Dems tried to have Trump killed—though that, of course, is a time-honored way to float the thought that maybe they possibly did.

So the termagant said, early on, after talking about Hunter "dating" Jill, and after helping us know how to pronounce the VP's name. The guy can keep it up all night, and he typically does.

That said, other members of Monday's panel may have seemed to be floating other theories of the conspiracy kind. It started in an innocuous way, possibly picked up steam:

Dr. Drew Pinsky, 65, grew up with every discernible advantage. He chooses to appear on Gutfeld! all the same.  

By 10:13, he was flatly misstating the contents of the 25th amendment. He then built upon his misstatement, telling us what "you can imagine": about the reason why President Biden stepped aside. 

For the record, "you can imagine" lots of things. On this occasion, Dr. Pinsky did.

"Where do they find people like this?" one of the analysts asked. We don't know, but by 10:17, this same Dr. Drew was lodging a complaint about the Biden administration.

"They're causing conspiracy theories to break out," the privileged potentate comically said. 

As we noted yesterday. the 23-year-ol model who is now dabbling took her turn at 10:33 p.m. "I've been called a conspiracy theorist all day," she said. 

From there, she proceeded to show several million viewers why such things had been said.

That said, it was the former professional wrestler who took the cake this night. At 10:35 p.m., the giant blob of protoplasm started by offering this:

TYRUS: Again, this is the DIE. The biggest questions that should be there is the coincidences that are just too ridiculous to ignore. 

He proceeded to list the coincidences that are just too ridiculous to ignore. In doing so, he seemed to create a speculation about the complicity of "Dr. President Jill" in the recent assassination attempt directed at Donald J. Trump.

It was all amazingly clear to Tyrus. None of the other analysts spoke up—and then at 10:39 p.m., the former professional wrestler and current savant was suddenly back for more:

TYRUS: We still don't know who ordered Afghanistan. It's the same person (pretends to cough)—Dr. President Jill. It's like the same person!

No one else spoke up. On this show, the first lady ordered Afghanistan back in 2021. By the next evening's Gutfeld! program, the termagant/host was saying he hopes she isn't "f*cking" her son.

So goes the nightly revolt, as directed by the aging señorito satisfecho. As this nightly revolt unspools, Blue America's finer thought leaders politely avert their gaze.

We'll close by citing a few other books:

More than a decade ago, we began to quote a prophetic statement by the classicist Norman O. Brown. Brown was very hot in the 1960s, on the basis of two books which we actually did read, or at least attempted to read:

Major books by Norman O. Brown 
Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History (1959)
Love's Body (1966)

Brown is rarely mentioned today. Back then, he was very hot. Upon his death in 2002, the New York Times published this lengthy obituary, testifying to his earlier influence.

More than a decade ago, something Brown once said began to trouble our dreams. We thought it must have come from one of his books, but as this memoir attests, it actually came from a Phi Beta Kappa Address he delivered at Columbia in 1960.

We don't know how we knew about that obscure address. That said, as best we can tell, the murky statement in question went like this:

BROWN (5/31/60): I sometimes think I see that societies originate in the discovery of some secret, some mystery; and end in exhaustion when there is no longer any secret, when the mystery has been divulged, that is to say profaned... 
And so there comes a time—I believe we are in such a time—when civilization has to be renewed by the discovery of some new mysteries, by the undemocratic but sovereign power of the imagination, by the undemocratic power which makes poets the unacknowledged legislators of all mankind, the power which makes all things new.

For the record, we have no clear idea what that actually means. That said, Brown seemed to suggest, even then, that our society was "ending in exhaustion." 

He said our civilization needed to be renewed by the discovery of a new mystery, "by the undemocratic power which makes poets the unacknowledged legislators of all [hu]mankind."

Brown sought the aid of the poets. We've thought this week of Carl Sandburg, the poet and the biographer. 

We've thought about the passage in Abraham Lincoln: The Prairie Years in which the president-elect journeys back to Coles County, Illinois to say goodbye to his step-mother—to Sally Bush Lincoln, the person who had been able to see, when Lincoln was young, that her stepson was very different.

In his famous biography of Lincoln, the poet described their last meeting:

SANDBURG: The next day Lincoln drove eight miles out to the old farm along the road over which he had hauled wood with an ox team. He came to the old log house he had cut logs for and helped smooth the chinks; from its little square windows he had seen late winter and early birds.

Sally Bush and he put their arms around each other and listened to each other’s heartbeats. They held hands and talked; they talked without holding hands. Each looked into eyes thrust back in deep sockets. She was all of a mother to him.

He was her boy more than any born to her. He gave her a photograph of her boy, a hungry picture of him standing and wanting, wanting. He stroked her face a last time, kissed good-by, and went away.

She knew his heart would go roaming back often, that even when he rode in an open carriage in New York or Washington with soldiers, flags or cheering thousands along the streets, he might just as like be thinking of her in the old log farmhouse out in Coles County, Illinois.

The sunshine of the prairie summer and fall months would come sifting down with healing and strength; between harvest and corn-plowing there would be rains beating and blizzards howling; and then there would be silence after snowstorms with white drifts piled against the fences, barns, and trees.

So spoke the poet biographer; so ended this brilliant chapter. In Sandburg's portrait, the sunshine of the prairie summer—and with it, the world of the "common man"—would be there in Lincoln's heart, even when he was being cheered by thousands in giant East Coast parades.

Ortega's "mass man" isn't the American average person. Over here in Blue America, we badly need a poet who can help us regain our connection to the world of people who didn't go to Harvard or Yale or Brown. 

We need to renew our civilization! Or are we the only people who are able to watch cable TV each night?

Over at the Fox News Channel, they assembly a gang of flyweights and clowns to go on the air each night. Each night, the jugglers and clowns proceed say the things they're paid to say. 

Our own thought leaders, in their greatness, choose to avert their gaze. We Blues continue to talk to ourselves, as we've been doing for years.

Sonnen? He's a submission grappling promoter but also, just perhaps, a bit of valuable tool. In the course of his daily life, he may be the world's nicest person.

That said, is the first lady f*cking her son? Did she order Afghanistan? Was she imaginably involved somehow in the assassination attempt?

Has the first lady been f*cking her son? Inquiring minds are encouraged to wonder. Timpf, who plays the thoughtful cast member, sits on her ascot and stares.


They took the car keys from President Biden!

THURSDAY, JULY 25, 2024

They've left the bombs in Trump's hands: In the case of President Biden, it was fairly easy for the press corps to identify the apparent problem. 

It looked like a type of problem which everyone had seen before, if only in classic films like Driving Miss Daisy or Under Golden Pond.

It looked like a type of "senility" or possibly "dementia." It looked like the type of problem which—as everyone persistently said—makes you take the keys away from an aging parent.

President Biden's apparent affliction seemed fairly easy to name. In the case of former president Trump. it has been much harder for our journalists to name his apparent or possible affliction.

The gentleman makes crazy statements with regularity, like the ones we noted yesterday afternoon. That said, he seems to be full of energy—and yes, he actually can complete sentences. He does so much of the time. 

Bowing to an ancient prohibition, our news orgs agreed that no one should discuss the possibility of some sort of severe mental illness. And so our major scribes—they aren't always especially sharp, and they aren't overwhelmingly honest—decided to brand Trump a LIAR and pretty much leave it at that.

That leaves us with a ranting person offering rants like the ones we mentioned yesterday. Also, it leaves us with a major, highly intelligent journalist writing am essay like the one Anne Applebaum just offered.

Applebaum is a very important journalist and author. She watched Trump's convention address, and she said she found it baffling. 

Eventually, he "digressed into pure gibberish," she says in her piece for The Atlantic. Here are the two examples she cited, exactly as they appear in The Atlantic, major typo and all:

They’re coming from prisons. They’re coming from jails. They’re coming from mental institutions and insane asylums. I—you know the press is always on because I say this. Has anyone seen The Silence of the Lambs? The late, great Hannibal Lecter. He’d love to have you for dinner. That’s insane asylums. They’re emptying out their insane asylums. And terrorists at numbers that we’ve never seen before. Bad things are going to happen.

Another:

In Venezuela, Caracas, high crime, high crime. Caracas, Venezuela, really a dangerous place. But not anymore, because in Venezuela, crime is down 72 percent. In fact, if they would ever in this election, I hate to even say that, we will have our next Republican convention in Venezuela because it will be safe. Our cities, our cities will be so unsafe, we won’t be able—we will not be able to have it there.

Applebaum described those excerpts as "pure gibberish." We can't really say we know why.

We aren't vouching for the accuracy of those presentations, which occurred shortly past the one-hour mark in one brief part of Trump's endless address. 

We aren't vouching for those presentations. As far as we know, Trump was making a set of (highly familiar) claims which are basically bogus.

Fact-checkers have widely stated that the picture he was painting there simply isn't accurate. But that doesn't mean that the statements are gibberish. They're part of a perfectly coherent set of claims which the candidate makes all the time—a perfectly coherent set of claims which seem to be grossly inaccurate.

What is Trump claiming in those excerpts? He's saying that governments in countries like Venezuela are emptying out their prisons and sending their criminals here.

Also, he's saying that governments are emptying their "insane asylums" and sending those people here. He's even supplying statistics about the drop in crime which has allegedly happened in countries like Venezuela. 

Alas! Fact-checkers have routinely said that his claims are unfounded and / or simply inaccurate. They've said that his statistics seem to have been made up. 

That said, it's easy to see what the gent is claiming. Why would someone as sharp as Applebaum describe those presentations as "gibberish?"

Before we proceed any further, at least three typos lurk in Applebaum's two examples. Here's what Trump actually said in that second example:

In fact, if they [the Democrats] would ever WIN this election—I hate to even say that—we will have our next Republican convention in Venezuela because it will be safe. 

Candidate Trump said "win," not "in." You can see that at the 67-minute mark of the C-Span videotape of his speech

As presented in The Atlantic, that second example didn't seem to make sense.  After correcting the typo, Trump's (very familiar) statement strikes us as easy to follow. The first example in The Atlantic also includes at least two typos, as you can see at the C-Span video's 65-minute mark.

That's amazingly sloppy work on the part of The Atlantic. Moving right along:

Presumably, Trump's statement about holding the next convention in Caracas wasn't mean to be taken literally. In fact, you can hear the audience laughing at several familiar parts of those two presentations.

Adjusting for such considerations, Trump was painting a familiar if inaccurate picture. He was claiming that our nation is being overrun by gangs of criminals and psychiatric patients who are being shipped here from foreign lands.

Why did those presentations strike Applebaum as "gibberish?" We have no idea. But beyond that, there lurks a larger question:

Is there something wrong in Donald Trump's head? If so, what is it?

Way back in 2017, Dr. Bandy C. Lee, a Yale psychiatrist, edited a best-selling book which carried this ominous title:

The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 37 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President 

Rightly or wrongly, the medical specialists who contributed essays to the book claimed that Trump was, or seemed to be, (severely) mentally ill, in a way which was said to be dangerous. With the book's publication, the inevitable happened:

Major news orgs agreed that such claims must never be discussed. 

The book was therefore disappeared. Later, our journalists were willing to discuss President Biden's possible "dementia," as was completely appropriate. But they've never been willing to discuss the (fairly obvious and tragic) possibility outlined in Dr. Lee's best-selling book.

Instead, they settled for calling him a LIAR. Also, at a fairly recent point, they began saying that Trump was exhibiting the same signs that had become apparent with President Biden. As they struggled to make that case, they ignored the larger, more obvious problem.

Our journalist settled for calling him a LIAR. But what if it's worse than that? 

Applebaum watched his convention address and called those excerpts "pure gibberish." We don't know why such a prominent and intelligent person would settle for that diagnosis.

It's easy to see what Trump was saying in the excerpts Appelbaum offered. But why was Trump making those overwrought claim—and why does he persistently make claims which are even crazier?

Applebaum's guild has never been willing to puzzle that out. They've been willing to take the car keys from Biden while leaving the bombs in Trump's hands! 


ANGER: The Termagant sat surrounded by Usefuls!

THURSDAY, JULY 25, 2024

"IDIOT," he instantly said: It was Monday evening, July 22. The Termagant sat on a Fox News Channel set, presiding over a gathering of Usefuls.

The show was broadcast at 10 o'clock Eastern. If normal procedures had been followed, the program had begun to tape at 6:15 p.m. 

As is his wont, The Termagant opened with a handful of jokes. For those condemned to be watching at home, this bracing bit of analysis was offered at 10:02 Eastern:

TERMAGANT (7/22/24) Now that all the Democratic Party's hopes are resting on the VP, once again they are saying that mispronouncing her name is racist. 

Remember, it's not "KAHM-ala." It's "IDIOT!"

[APPRECIATIVE LAUGHTER, APPLAUSE]

Thus spake The Termagant, encased in a chorus of Usefuls. As he delivered this bit of messaging, his program was two minutes old. 

So it goes, night after night, in this, the American nation. In his very next joke, the Termagant delivered what has become a nightly theme:

Now that President Biden has left the campaign, Hunter Biden and first lady Jill Biden may be "dating" or "f*cking." 

In yesterday's report, we transcribed the text of these recent jokes. Last night, the angry fellow delivered that message again, this time a bit later in the primetime "cable news" program than has become the norm.

Back to the gaggle of Usefuls! Yesterday, we called the roll of Monday evening's collection. The roster looked like this:

It included a 23-year-old model and actress who "has begun to dabble in politics."

It included a 400-pound former "wrestling champion" who spent the evening saying and suggesting that "Dr. President Jill" had been the secret mastermind behind a recent assassination attempt, but also behind the withdrawal from Afghanistan in the summer of 2021.

It included a 65-year-old "American media personality" who had grown up with every apparent advantage, but chose to appear on this program all the same.

It included the person who is cast, and who performs, as he program's more thoughtful "libertarian." As you can see by clicking this link, she was soon marveling at this fact about the previous day's announcement by President Joseph R. Biden:

TIMPF (7/22/24): The dude drops out on Twitter! It's like, it's like, you can't—

It's all so crazy, and it's crazy in ways that none of us can expect.  I mean, where is he? 

Where is he? the Thoughtful Cast Member said. Scornfully, she said the president's failure to appear in public was "crazy in ways that none of us can expect." 

For the record, the dude in question is 81 years old. As everyone else on the planet knew, he had been at home, recovering from Covid, when he made his announcement. 

Everyone understood this fact—everyone except The Usefuls and The Termagant himself. 

Sad! Timpf was extending a point of feigned puzzlement The Termagant himself had introduced in the program's very first minute. In the program's very next minute, he was messaging the claim in which Vice President Harris is an IDIOT. 

The reason for the president's failure to make a public appearance was never mentioned this night.

So it went as this gaggle of Usefuls advanced the messaging of the "cable news" channel which pays them. So it went as a 400-pound professional wrestler kept suggesting that the first lady had somehow been involved in a recent assassination attempt. 

Conspiracy theories were floating about as the hour proceeded. As early as 10:07 p.m., The Termagant almost seemed to be floating one such idea by saying that he wasn't. 

("I'm not suggesting the Dems tried to have Trump killed.")

He may not have been suggesting that, but the wrestler was less fastidious. Meanwhile, the astounding stupidity of this panel was showcased all through the night.

For the record, it isn't the fault of the 23-uear-old model that she's only begun to dabble. She didn't book herself on the show—though we'll assume that the suits who accomplished that task understood what they'd be getting.

During the course of the hour-long program, this particular Useful engaged in a world-record assortment of absurd speculations:

She suggested that Hillary Clinton might end up replacing Vice President Harris as the Democratic candidate for president.

("I know she endorsed Kamala," The Dabbler said at one point. But "I think it will be the least embarrassing path the Democrats can take.")

Also this! Why hadn't Barack Obama endorsed Harris yet? 

The Dabbler was asked, and the Dabbler answered:

"He might be chirping in Michelle's ear, Hey, this might be your time to run, which I don't really think is that far-fetched."

She didn't think it was that far-fetched! Later, Gutfeld himself advanced the idea that Hillary Clinton will be named as Candidate Harris' running mate.

He explicitly described the idea as his personal theory. Eventually, the ruminations about the possible running mate led to this excursion:

GUTFELD: Dr Drew, I don't think any VP will help her unless it's like a name.

PINSKY: I agree with you completely, but she might come up with somebody, right? This is going to seem maybe silly, but I don't understand—RFK is taking a certain percentage of the populace. Why doesn't someone try to cozy up to him?

It seems like that would be interesting. But would he be too far away from her platform?

Gutfeld said that didn't make sense. The Dabbler then offered this:

AUSTIN: I think Bobby's too presidential for that anyway. Her actually makes most sense out of any other Democrat I've seen—but Andrew Yang is very popular. He's very likable. I'm very surprised he wasn't on that list.

She can't believe that Yang isn't on the list! Meanwhile, Bobby makes the most sense, she said. But he's just too presidential!

(At no point were any actual names on the actual list ever actually mentioned. So it tends to go on this imitation of life.)

There's nothing morally wrong with seeming to know nothing at all about the imaginable shape of American party politics. That isn't a moral flaw. 

On the other hand, it might suggest that such people might not be good selections for an hour-long, primetime discussion of such important events.

It isn't the fault of the 23-year-old model and actress that she thinks the things she does. That said, she was also soon describing what had been said about her all day, and she was helping show why such things had been said:

("I've been called a conspiracy theorist all day," she said. She then proceeded to float the theory that had produced such rebukes.)

More on that tomorrow. Meanwhile, the wrestler spent the evening suggesting that "Dr. President Jill" was complicit in the assassination attempt, but also in the botched withdrawal from Afghanistan. So it went as the Fox News Channel opened the garbage can.

"America is a stupid nation." So said Candidate Trump, yesterday, in a rally.  In large part thanks to his own efforts, he may have the germ of a point. 

What isn't stupid is the reasoning behind the nightly booking of these Usefuls as guests. They're released on the air to promote approved points, and that's what they reliably do.

The woods are lovely, dark and deep, but our nation's brain cells are under assault from grimy shows like Gutfeld!

Its angry host calls women names, especially when they're too fat. He says he hopes that Hunter and Jill aren't f*cking at this point.

When asked to pronounce a certain person's name correctly, he supplies his replacement: 

IDIOT.

The anger of the termagant makes him very stupid. But as this grimy little guy swings from trees in the manner described, propaganda is being pushed and Blue America's major thought leaders agree to avert their gaze.

Sacred Troy must die, noble Hector said. How about sacred America?

IDIOT, The Termagant said. As he angrily offered his thought, he was surrounded by USEFULS.

Tomorrow: Highly expert professional wrestler nails "Dr. President Jill"


We're puzzled because Anne Applebaum's puzzled!

WEDNESDAY, JULY 24, 2024

Applebaum listens to Trump: Anne Applebaum gives voice to the germ of a highly valid point in a recent essay for The Atlantic.

Her essay appears beneath the headlines shown below. The headlines do a decent job of stating her basic thesis:

Suddenly Trump Looks Older and More Deranged
Now the Republicans are the ones saddled with a candidate who can’t make a clear argument or finish a sentence.

It's true! President Biden's apparent decline was relatively easy to peg as some form of "dementia" or "senility"—more generally, as some familiar form of cognitive decline, of a type which often comes with advanced age.

Now that President Biden is out of the race, Candidate Trump is the candidate who's very old by historical standards. Also, he may perhaps seem to be "deranged," though his form of mental disorder has always seemed to be harder for mainstream journalists to name or report or describe.

What explains the crazy statements and crazy proposals Trump is inclined to make? On Monday, July 1, the New York Times reported the latest episode, one which struck us as remarkable:

Trump Amplifies Calls to Jail Top Elected Officials, Invokes Military Tribunals

Former President Donald J. Trump over the weekend escalated his vows to prosecute his political opponents, circulating posts on his social media website invoking “televised military tribunals” and calling for the jailing of President Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, Senators Mitch McConnell and Chuck Schumer and former Vice President Mike Pence, among other high-profile politicians.

Mr. Trump, using his account on Truth Social on Sunday, promoted two posts from other users of the site that called for the jailing of his perceived political enemies.

One post that he circulated on Sunday singled out Liz Cheney, the former Wyoming congresswoman who is a Republican critic of Mr. Trump’s, and called for her to be prosecuted by a type of military court reserved for enemy combatants and war criminals.

“Elizabeth Lynne Cheney is guilty of treason,” the post said. “Retruth if you want televised military tribunals.”

Really? As president, Trump would want a televised military tribunal for Lynne Cheney? He had now "called for her to be prosecuted by a type of military court reserved for enemy combatants and war criminals?"

For various reasons, these apparent proposals may indeed seem "deranged." But the episode came and went with little attention from the mainstream press. For whatever reason, the mainstream press corps seems to lack a way to react to such crazy proposals.

For starters, just a guess:

In part, this reflects the refusal by the mainstream press to consult with medical or psychological specialists about Trump's mental and /or cognitive health. 

We've discussed this abdication of duty about a million times by now. For today, we'll leave it at this:

Our high-end career journalists aren't super-sharp. Beyond that, they aren't always super-honest. 

To appearances, they simply aren't willing to enter this dangerous conceptual territory. This leaves them with no obvious way to describe or report this man's apparent or possible madness.

In recent months, elements of the mainstream and Blue American press began behaving as if Trump's behavior was a mirror image of Biden's. You see that reflected in the headline atop Applebaum's essay, in which it's said that Donald J. Trump "can't finish a sentence."

We've seen Donald J. Trump finish plenty of sentences in the past few months! To some extent, that type of description seemed to go the heart of President Biden's apparent difficulties. The apparent madness of Donald J. Trump is a phenomenon of a different kind.

Having said that, we'll add this:

 We were puzzled to see that Applebaum was puzzled by certain excerpts from Trump's convention address. In her essay, she includes two brief excerpts from that endless speech which she describes as "pure gibberish."

After presenting the excerpts and describing them as gibberish, she says that Trump's "performance seemed deranged, sinister, and frightening." For now, we'll just tell you this:

The excerpts in question may (or may not) be viewed as borderline crazy. But the excerpts don't strike us as "gibberish" at all, let alone as gibberish of the pure kind.

(The fact that a major typo appears in one excerpt doesn't help Applebaum's case.)

The excerpts in questions may (or may not) be scored as borderline crazy—but why would Applebaum, an extremely important major writer, see them as gibberish? Tomorrow, we'll return to this topic, and we'll show you the excerpts in question.

In our view, something is wrong with Donald J. Trump. Also, something is keeping our major journalists from being able to say what it is—for being able to say what it is right out loud.

 

SACRED: There's nothing wrong with being 23!

WEDNESDAY, JULY 24, 2024

There's something bad wrong with this: There's nothing wrong with being 23. Almost everyone knows that.

There is something wrong with our failing American culture. Frequently, the elements of this cosmic dysfunction are almost wholly ignored.

So it was this Monday night, when the Fox News Channel aired its latest edition of the primetime "cable news" program, Gutfeld! 

There's nothing wrong with being 23, and almost everyone knows it. There's something cosmically wrong with this garbage can program—and it's one of the two or three most watched programs in all of "cable news."

We mention age for a reason. That night, the program's bosses had assembled the usual collection of flyweights to assist the program's termagant host in butchering the evening's familiar pseudo-discussions. 

There's nothing wrong with being 23! Under the circumstances, something that's wrong may be lurking within this recent profile in the New York Post:

Meet Emily Austin, the social media star behind DAZN’s Devin Haney-Ryan Garcia promotion

For a fight between two boxing stars—Devin Haney vs. Ryan Garcia Saturday night at Barclays Center—who are so active on social media, DAZN added a social media star to help in its broadcast and promotion. 

Emily Austin, a sports and entertainment host who has recently begun dabbling in political commentary as well, was recently announced as DAZN’s social presenter throughout fight week.

She was featured on multiple DAZN social channels, interviewing a plethora of the biggest figures around the fight. 

Few in media have as large of a following as Austin, which she has now brought to one of the most anticipated fights of the year. A host of her own “Hoop Chat” podcast, a Miss Universe judge and owner of her own “People’s Beauty” skincare company, Austin has 2.1 million followers on Instagram and 512.8K followers on TikTok.

[...]

Originally focused on sports, particularly basketball and the NBA, Austin has recently delved into politics. 

She is an ardent pro-Israel activist, and has been outspoken since Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack and has even met with former hostages who were released. She’s become a regular guest on “Gutfeld!” and has plans to launch her own political show on various social media platforms. 

There's nothing wrong with being 23. At least in theory, there's nothing wrong with being "a sports and entertainment host," or with being the owner of your own skincare company.

At least in theory, and in most contexts, there's nothing wrong with any of that! At least in theory, there may be something wrong with employing the person described in that April 20 profile in the way the Fox News Channel now does.

Emily Austin, 23, isn't just "a sports and entertainment host." (For the record, she's also a model and actress, according to the leading authority on her career). 

It isn't just sports and entertainment! At age 23, Austin has also "begun dabbling in political commentary," according to the profile in the Post. 

As the profile notes, that largely refers to the fact she has become a regular guest on The Channel's Gutfeld! program, one of the most disordered programs in the history of TV news.

Austin made her latest appearance this past Monday night. Before we start to show you where that went, let's go back to the beginning.

According to that profile in the Post, Austin was recently announced as DAZN’s "social presenter," whatever that is, for an upcoming "fight between two boxing stars."

That said, does anyone know what DAZN is? As it turns out, The Shadow knows—and The Shadow tells us this:

DAZN

DAZN (pronounced "da zone") is a British over-the-top sports streaming and entertainment platform. Founded in 2007 as Perform Group via the merger of Premium TV Limited and Inform Group, it is owned by Access Industries, the investment group founded by Sir Len Blavatnik, and is headquartered in London, England...

The DAZN platform was founded in 2015 and broadcasts live and on-demand sport in over 200 countries worldwide with a strong domestic presence in Italy, Spain, Germany, Japan, France, Portugal, Belgium, Taiwan, the United States and Canada, where it has key domestic broadcast rights. It is considered to be Europe's largest digital sports broadcaster with over 75 programming rights. As of 2023, the service has 20 million paid subscribers globally.

Outside of streaming, DAZN has since expanded into in-play betting, gaming, e-commerce, merchandise and ticketing...

According to that leading authority, DAZN isn't just a "sports streaming and entertainment platform." It's an over-the-top streaming platform, whatever that may mean. 

In theory, there's nothing wrong with any of the additional material in that thumbnail profile. Indeed, betting and gaming have become increasingly large components of American sports culture.

At any rate, there we see what DAZN is. As for Austin herself, she has hired on to be a presenter—and she has recently begun to dabble in politics, for example on the Gutfeld! program.

Also this:

Thanks to the democratization of media, Austin has plans to launch her own political show on various social media platforms.  At any rate, there she was, this past Monday night, seated as part of the four-member Gutfeld! panel. 

Let it further be said that, as judged by conventional norms, the model and actress is highly telegenic. Also, as we've already mentioned, she's 23 years old.

Full disclosure! You don't have to be a telegenic young woman to serve on a Gutfeld! panel! Austin shared air this enchanted evening with Dr. Drew Pinsky, a 65-year-old (male) "American media personality" and the former host of the Loveline TV program.

Full disclosure! Pinsky's commentary this evening was almost as fatuous as that which was offered by Austin. There's nothing wrong with being 23, or even with being 65. But there's something bad wrong with the moral garbage can and the journalistic gong show The Channel cracked open this night.

With apologies, we're going to wait until tomorrow to start to show you what was said on Monday's evening's program. Spoiler alert:

The journalistic content arrived in a Volkswagen bus which was crowded with clowns. The moral content may have been worse.

As we showed you yesterday, the program opened with what has become a standard theme for the program's 59-year-old bad boy host. The program began with what has become his nightly joke about Hunter Biden trying to "date" his stepmother. 

In yesterday's report, we transcribed the content of Monday night's joke. Last night, the 59-year-old man with the mountain of rage visited the theme again, two minutes into his program. 

Citizens, there he went again! Last night, his sally was substantially edgier. Here's what the termagant said:

GUTFELD (7/23/24): Speaking of Jill, where's she been, huh? And come to think of it, where's Hunter? 

Hmmmmm.

[AUDIENCE CHUCKLES, GROANS]

I hope they're not [BLEEP]ing.

[AUDIENCE ROARS]

(Feigning incomprehension) What? I mean—

Just hoping! It's a good hope!

"Didn't see that one coming, did ya?" the humorist now wonderfully said.

Each person can assess the suitability of this latest sally by this show's irrepressible host. For the record, the fact that his verb was BLEEPed by The Channel suggests to us that this is what he actually said to his shrieking studio audience:

GUTFELD: Speaking of Jill, where's she been, huh? And come to think of it, where's Hunter? 

Hmmmmm.

[AUDIENCE CHUCKLES, GROANS]

I hope they're not f*cking.

[AUDIENCE ROARS]

(Feigning incomprehension) What?...

We'll assume that's what he actually said—in his program's second minute! But this is becoming a standard theme. It's becoming the way he now kickstarts his program on a nightly basis.

We each can assess that as we will. It seems to us that this turn in American journalistic culture is worth recording for the sake of posterity.

Last week, we recorded, for posterity, the behavior of five employees on a Fox & Friends Weekend program. This week, we think it's worth recording some of what happened on Monday evening's Gutfeld!

Each citizen can assess the suitability of that early jest. In all honesty, there can be little doubt about the subsequent journalistic content of Monday evening's program.

Full disclosure: Gutfeld! is a primetime nightly program on the nation's most watched "news channel." For purposes of corporate misdirection, it's masqueraded as a "comedy show" on that "cable news" channel. 

In reality, Gutfeld! is a propaganda program—a program whose guests will push the Fox News Channel's political scripts with stunning fidelity, but also with astonishing dumbness.

Emily Austin, age 23, has begun to dabble in politics. Dr Drew, age 65, was the longtime Loveline host.

On Monday night, they were joined by a 400-pound former professional wrestler and by a comedian who is cast as the program's more thoughtful "libertarian." All such players seem to know that they're being paid by Fox to promulgate ownership's scripts

Why was Austin on that program? Tomorrow, we'll force ourselves to start to show you some you some of the things she said. Her political dabbling was astoundingly bad on this particular evening. Pinsky's dabbling wasn't much better, and for sheer unvarnished dumbness, Gutfeld himself came close to taking the cake.

Conspiracy theories were floating about, most of them involving the imagined machinations of "Dr. President Jill." This program is a braincell-devouring moral cesspool, night after night after night. 

"Sacred Troy must die," Hector of the shining helmet once quite famously said. He delivered this prophecy to Andromache, his generous wife.

As our own sacred culture continues to die, the people who went to the finer schools agree not to notice or comment.

Has the first lady been BLEEPing her son? Over there, on the Fox News Channel, telegenic young people are dabbling in news and inquiring minds want to know.

Tomorrow: Yes, it was really this stupid