Lauer astonishes. So does Chait!

THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2016

We spot one silver lining:
We were struck by Jonathan Chait's reaction to last night's gong-show.

Chait watched NBC's hour-long "Commander-in-Chief" forum. Headline included, he starts today's post like this:
CHAIT (9/8/16): Matt Lauer’s Pathetic Interview of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Is the Scariest Thing I’ve Seen in This Campaign

I had not taken seriously the possibility that Donald Trump could win the presidency until I saw Matt Lauer host an hour-long interview with the two major-party candidates.
Lauer’s performance was not merely a failure, it was horrifying and shocking. The shock, for me, was the realization that most Americans inhabit a very different news environment than professional journalists. I not only consume a lot of news, since it’s my job, I also tend to focus on elite print-news sources. Most voters, and all the more so undecided voters, subsist on a news diet supplied by the likes of Matt Lauer. And the reality transmitted to them from Lauer matches the reality of the polls, which is a world in which Clinton and Trump are equivalently flawed.
I have no idea why Chait didn't think that Trump could win until last night. It has been obvious for some time that Candidate Trump has a real chance to win. For some reason, this only occurred to Chait last night, and it seems to have come as a shock.

Even more remarkably, I have no idea why Chait thinks he saw Lauer treat Candidates Clinton and Trump as if they were "equivalently flawed." It's hard to know why he'd think he saw that. Consider the way the two half-hour sessions began.

Lauer started Clinton off with a lengthy set of questions about the email matter. The questions have all been asked and answered about a million times by now. Perhaps for that reason, Lauer gave his initial question on this topic a bit of a booster shot:
LAUER (9/7/16): The word “judgment” has been used a lot around you, Secretary Clinton, over the last year-and-a-half, and in particular concerning your use of your personal email and server to communicate while you were secretary of state. You’ve said it’s a mistake.

CLINTON: Mm-hmm.

LAUER: You said you made not the best choice. You were communicating on highly sensitive topics. Why wasn’t it more than a mistake? Why wasn’t it disqualifying, if you want to be commander-in-chief?
We'd have to say that's amazing. In his first real question of the night, Lauer directly suggested that Clinton's conduct may have been "disqualifying."

Lauer burned almost forty percent of Clinton's segment with this topic, asking questions which have been asked a million times by now. When his own inquisition was done, the first question from the audience concerned the same topic.

We assume that the audience questions were screened. The first audience question was this:
QUESTION: Secretary Clinton, thank you very much for coming tonight. As a naval flight officer, I held a top secret sensitive compartmentalized information clearance. And that provided me access to materials and information highly sensitive to our warfighting capabilities. Had I communicated this information not following prescribed protocols, I would have been prosecuted and imprisoned.

Secretary Clinton, how can you expect those such as myself who were and are entrusted with America’s most sensitive information to have any confidence in your leadership as president when you clearly corrupted our national security?
We assume the questions were screened. That said:

In Lauer's first question, he suggested that Clinton's conduct may have been "disqualifying." In the first audience question, Clinton was told that she had "clearly corrupted our national security." It's suggested she should be in prison.

Liberal lambs, can we talk? The notion that Clinton is disqualifyingly corrupt has been the essence of the press corps' framing of her over the past several years. Those "questions" define an aggressive attack. They land in a well-scripted sweet spot.

By way of contrast, Candidate Trump has done nothing "disqualifying," to judge from his treatment by Lauer. It's amazing that someone like Lauer would feel free to inject a suggestion of that type into a campaign forum. But if he made such a suggestion to Clinton, he might at least want to go after Trump with an initial high hard one.

Nothing like that occurred. Lauer tossed some slow-pitch softballs as he started his questions for Trump. The first question from the audience carried no harsh accusation:
QUESTION: Mr. Trump, over the past 15 years, a lot of U.S. troops have bled and died securing towns and provinces from Iraq to Afghanistan, only to have insurgent groups like ISIS spring back the moment we leave. Now, you’ve claimed to have a secret plan to defeat ISIS. But you’re hardly the first politician to promise a quick victory and a speedy homecoming. So assuming we do defeat ISIS, what next? What is your plan for the region to ensure that a group like them doesn’t just come back?
In essence, Candidate Clinton was accused of being "clearly corrupt." Candidate Trump was asked to discuss his plan.

Other weird inconsistencies were visible. Quite weirdly, Lauer scolded Clinton, not once but twice, when she criticized Trump at the end of her segment (without even mentioning his name.) According to Lauer, she had broken the agreement with which each segment began, the agreement to put such attacks aside.

During the second half hour, Trump repeatedly attacked Obama and Clinton (and Kerry) by name. Lauer never said a word about any broken agreements.

We'll agree with Chait on one point. Last night's session was horrific, in an array of ways. So was the subsequent punditry, which we'll hope to discuss tomorrow. Appearing with Anderson Cooper, Nia-Malika Henderon gave an appalling review of one statement by Clinton—an appalling pundit review for the ages.

Later, on today's Morning Joe, the children went on and on, then on and on, about Clinton's failed "stylistics." In what way had her "stylistics" failed? None of the children explained.

There's only one term for these broken-souled ghouls; they're not recognizably human. Wealth and celebrity fry human brains. Their brains burned away long ago.

Somehow, something resembling this realization may have come to Chait last night. In the process, it finally occurred to him that Candidate Trump might win the November election. Welcome back to earth!

We think Trump has an excellent chance, and we think that people like Chait have helped create the world in which that might happen. Meanwhile, have you tried to fight your way through Josh Marshall's account of last evening's forum?

Sad! For now, one last rumination:

Has Candidate Trump ever committed an act which might be seen as "disqualifying?" We think it's astonishing that someone like Lauer would inject such a suggestion into a presidential forum. But if we agree that sauce for the goose might sometimes be sauce for the gander, we can think of at least one offense with which Trump might have been confronted:

Didn't he once spend a year lying about the birth of the reigning commander-in-chief? Had there been any truth to the various claims he advanced? Had everything he said been a lie? Was the entire thing slander?

Would it be too much to ask about that at a commander-in-chief forum? Given prevailing rules of the guild, yes, it plainly would be.

We expect to discuss more aspects of last night's horrible gong-show. For now, let's imagine a silver lining in the event of a win by Trump.

Based on reactions to last night's forum, it might finally happen! If Candidate Trump ends up in the White House, career liberals might finally rebel, right out loud, against the appalling behavior of the boys and girls of the mainstream press corps.

The Chaits have averted their gaze forever. For at least one of their number, last night may have been too much.

13 comments:

  1. A sense a bit of a silver lining already, the reactions to this show that just maybe we are not going to "take it" in Bob's well worn phrase. I also don't see credible polls suggesting Clinton's post convention lead is wavering much. When they actually face off, he's finished.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sadly, until the boys and girls in the press corps actually own the media that employ them, they will do what the boss tells them. As long as millionaires own the media, our democracy will hear only the narratives they care to create, and those narratives serve their own interests, not those of the American people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sadly, until the boys and girls in the press corps actually own the media that employ them, they will do what the boss tells them. As long as millionaires own the media, our democracy will hear only the narratives they care to create, and those narratives serve their own interests, not those of the American people.

    ReplyDelete
  4. My boyfriend broke up with me its been 4 days now. We have been dating sense he was 18 and I was 22. he has just know turned 21. We have been dating for 3 years and 2 and half months. Through the years we have had a really good relationship it was serious and we really wanted to be with each other forever. Of course we had are arguments but nothing too bad. I know that these past 3 months I had taken him for granted thinking he would always be there but was wrong. he told me he didn’t want to be in a relationship that he wanted to take time with himself. But he was still kissin me and hugging me and telling me that he will always love me and I hold a special place in her heart. I realized that right before he done this that I needed to get my act together but I guess was too late. I really love this boy there is something different about him he is the love of my life and I want us to have a better relationship then ever before and I wouldn’t ever take him for granted ever again I really do want to marry this boy and he wanted that too but idk how to get him back with out being clingy and desperate. Obviously he needs his space because he cheated on me and this time I really need help to bring him back and marry me, one day i was searching online and i saw a good testimony of how Dr Joy a real Africa spell caster help to restored back broken marriage, getting ex back, fix broken relationship. so i copy his email via??? joylovespell@gmail.com and told him all my problems so he ask me not to worry that my problem are solve that with 2 days, i will get him back which i believe in and put all my hope on and to my greatest notice, after the spell my boyfriend who broke up with me gave me a call to apology and feel so sorry for what he did so my dear ones that is how i got my boyfriend back with the help of Dr joy the real spell caster so also email him now on via joylovespell@gmail.com????

    ReplyDelete
  5. Candidate Trump was asked to discuss his plan.

    In a way this was a gotcha question. It exposes the fact that Trump has no plan to fulfill his wonderful promises.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It was a stupid question. The only correct answer is "I won't reveal my military strategy to anyone except my cabinet and the Pentagon."
    It may be bs but any other reply would be as stupid as the question.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Lauer didn't scold Trump for violating the rule about attacking his opponent because she had already nullified it. Trump had no obligation to unilaterally disarm.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If they both agreed to the rule, then Lauer should have called them both out for violating it. If your neighbor cheats on his taxes, you don't get to use that as an excuse to cheat on yours. You can see the ultimate in this kind of "reasoning" when Trump refuses to release his tax returns because he thinks Clinton hasn't released enough of her emails.

      Delete
  8. My ex and me were together for a years and 4 months, we were very happy to be husband and wife, last month we went to Los Angeles and stayed with his family, after we got back he started acting distant, then he started hanging out with a girl, and kept sneaking off to go hangout with her, so i got upset, i could not endure, i tried to do everything to please him but it got worst, one day he left the house and never came back, i tried reaching him but no way i could reach him, because of the heart break he has put me into, i went into search of a real spell caster but I was scammed several times, but I never relented in my search because I want a happy life with my boyfriend, when i saw testimony about spell caster Dr Joy on the internet, so i contacted him and to my greatest surprise (((joylovespell@gmail.com))) restored my relationship, my boyfriend came back to me, i took him back and I am now settled with him by the magic power of Dr Joy spell Thanks Julie Derby From Usa Arizona

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hello viewer's , i want to share with you of a great spell caster who help me cast a spell on my ex boy friend who used me and dumped me for my girl friend, so when i met this great spell caster called Dr Aza, i explain what i was passing through. So he gave me instruction to follow, which i did, after three day's when the spell was cast, my ex boy friend called and started apologizing to me and said he want me back.You can also contact him if you have any problem via email azaspellcaster@gmail.com you can call him or what,s App his number:+2348107155060, to help you with your problems.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What else can i say rather than to thank Doctor Osemu who God used to reunite my marriage. Each day of my life, i ask God to bless Dr. Osemu for he has made my life complete by bringing back my husband to me and for this reason, i made a vow to my self that i will testify on the internet to let the world know that Dr. Osemu is a God on Earth. My husband and i had a fight for three days which led to our divorce. On this faithful day, i came across a testimony of how Dr. Osemu helped a lady in getting back her lover. So, i contacted him and explained to him and he told me that my days of sorrows are over that my husband will come back to me within 12 to 16 hours for he's going to prepare a spell for me. Could you believe it, my husband came home begging that he needs me back. Do you need any kind of help? Contact him now via email: ( Doctorokpamenspelltemple@hotmail.com ), Website: http://doctorokpamenpowerfulspelltemple.webs.com, call and whats App him via +2348135254384 OR for more confirmation, call or text me on my cell# +1 (914) 517-3229. Becky Nolan USA.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Life is good when you have your love ones around you, I am saying this because when i had issues with my lover i never seen life as a good thing but thanks to Dr. AGBAZARA of AGBAZARA TEMPLE, for helping me to cast a spell that brought my lover back to me within the space of 48hours. My husband left me for another woman after 7years of marriage,but Dr.AGBAZARA help me cast a spell that brought him back to me within 48hours. I am not going to tell you more details about myself rather i will only advise those who are having issues in there relationship or marriages to contact Dr.AGBAZARA TEMPLE through these details via email; ( agbazara@gmail.com ) or call him OR Whatsapp: +2348104102662

    ReplyDelete