Gennifer Flowers returns: On Tuesday night, Gennifer Flowers resurfaced on Fox in response to TonedeafGate.
"I think Bill is afraid," the fearless truth-teller fearlessly told Laura Ingraham. "I am advocating that Bill be prosecuted for his sex crimes just like Harvey Weinstein has been arrested and Bill Cosby is about to be sentenced."
Back in August 1999, the fearless truth-teller fearlessly told Chris Matthews about the many murders the Clintons had staged. Chris was surprised, or at least he pretended. But in the course of his half-hour interview, he didn't miss the chance to tell her how smokin' hot she was.
On Tuesday night, Flowers broke some news. She now regards her alleged relationship with Bill Clinton as a case of sexual harassment. "Back in 1977 when I met Bill, we didn't have the laws to protect us," she bravely said.
This represents a large switch. Back in 1992, when she got rich interrupting a presidential election, Flowers told the world that she and her Bill had enjoyed a torrid, twelve-year love affair. She told the same story in her 1995 book, Passion and Bertayal, in which she thoughtfully recalled the first time she laid eyes on Hillary Clinton:
FLOWERS: I was shocked. She looked like a big fat frump with her hair hanging down kind of curly and wavy. She had big, thick glasses; an ugly dress; and a big, fat butt.Also, Hillary was just screamingly gay, as Flowers fearlessly confessed on Hannity & Colmes. This is who Flowers is.
At any rate, on Tuesday night, she unveiled her newest story. Forget that torrid twelve-year love affair with "my Bill." As it turns out, Flowers was the victim of sexual harassment. And she wants to lock him up!
Many people actually are the victims of sexual harassment. On the other hand, sometimes we the people are the victims of disordered people who make sh*t up.
The presence of Flowers on the scene helps define an interesting problem. Most people can't imagine going on national TV and simply making sh*t up. This make it hard for us to believe that other people do that.
By instinct, we tend to assume that people aren't lying when they tell the sorts of tales that Flowers told in 1992, making tons of cash (at least $500,000) in the process.
On Tuesday night, Flowers was back with her latest story. Instinctively, most of us are inclined to believe other people when they share "their truth."
On Tuesday night, we watched Flowers sharing her latest truth. Ingraham didn't challenge her none. That's how the game is played.
It's hard for most of us people to believe that other people sometimes invent giant falsehoods. Given the way our modern media work, this is a big giant problem.
The New York Times fluffed Flowers good in October 2016. They even resurrected Connie Hamzy!
Are you sure that front-page report didn't tilt the election all by itself? What makes us so sure about that?
At any rate, it wasn't a torrid, 12-year love affair after all. At some point, we the people will have to decide that we really can't tolerate this.
No more hiding in the bushes. No more "$haring their truth."
Still coming: The things a person can see on Tucker Carlson's program
"Many people actually are the victims of sexual harassment."
ReplyDeleteA lot of people are, I'm sure. Though not too many among the upper-class 'metoo' clique, I reckon...
"I'm sure. "
DeleteComing from the guy that's sure Trump siding with CitiBank, Chase, and Wells Fargo over the American citizens proves he's "Anti-Establishment", your "I'm sure" carries little to no weight.
More good news for the economically anxious mythological trump voters:
DeleteHouse Republicans voted overwhelmingly to eliminate funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP, after approving a White House budget plan.
Representatives voted 210-206 — with 187 Democrats and 19 Republicans against — to rescind nearly $15 billion in unspent funding that had previously been approved, including $7 billion for CHIP, reported the New York Times.
Also, file this under, why Donny the Chickenshit is such a fucking flim flam lying bastard.
Trump Sides with Ken Paxton to Argue Pre-Existing Conditions Protections are Unconstitutional
Let's see how many times he campaigned to do the exact opposite, suckers.
Trump Wants to Ditch Preexisting Condition Protections. Here Are the Times He Promised Not To.
The president turns his back on years of promises.
Patrick CaldwellJun. 8, 2018 3:27 PM
Shortly after he was elected in November 2016, Trump sat down for an interview with 60 Minutes, where he was asked if he would protect people with preexisting conditions. “Yes,” Trump responded, “because it happens to be one of the strongest assets.” (He told the Wall Street Journal the same thing around that time.)
"Representatives voted 210-206 — with 187 Democrats and 19 Republicans against..."
DeleteT'would be interesting to know who the four Democratic traitors were are against CHIP. There are 191 Democrats in the House. What's even more interesting is that there are 435 reps. Why only 426 votes? I guess that this is the "sausage" fondly alluded to in the law-making process. And since 19 Republicans voted against the measure, it must mean that there are some “good” Republicans, legislation-wise. Seems unlikely, but it’s a possibility. *cough*
Leroy
"House Republicans voted overwhelmingly to eliminate funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP, after approving a White House budget plan"
DeleteThanks for this, dear. It illustrates perfectly how truly goebbelsian the liberal propaganda machine has become; peddling brazen lies like this.
Well, on the other hand: hey, it's only zombies on the receiving end; what's the harm.
"Among the funding to be rescinded is $7 billion for the Children’s Health Insurance Program, or CHIP — a curious move in an election year, at least from a public relations standpoint. But the budget office said canceling that funding would not change what the government spends on CHIP or affect the number of children with coverage."
"Trump Sides with Ken Paxton to Argue Pre-Existing Conditions Protections are Unconstitutional"
DeleteThis one is equally goebbelsian: "The U.S. Justice Department said on Thursday that the part of Obamacare requiring individuals to have health insurance is unconstitutional..."
No one said, obviously, that covering pre-existing conditions per se is unconstitutional.
But hey, it's zombies on the receiving end. They'll consume anything.
"They'll consume anything."
DeleteNot the bigotry. There is nothing for them to consume after Trump voters licked the plate clean.
Isn't that lovely, Mao, man of the people is quoting the elitist New York Times. You can almost smell the powdered wigs in the story as told by the old gray lady.
Delete...a Gesture of Fiscal Restraint
Right there in the headline.
NYT is promoted by google, another establishment tool (far more efficient than you dembots).
DeleteNo worries, next time I'll use yandex. And thanks for paying attention.
policy is debatable, of course, among differing points of reference, and you should try to reckon even with the formulation that lowering taxes is income redistribution.
DeleteThe NYT piece is behind a firewall in my case, but this is pithy for what I think you wanted to convey, Mao.
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/53830
No one said, obviously, that covering pre-existing conditions per se is unconstitutional.
DeleteYou really are an ignorant horse's ass, you would cheerfully provide the rope to this administration which they will use to hang you.
Here, jackass, let me help you out. The DOJ did indeed say that exact thing in their brief filed in support of the Plaintiff.
Let's cut to the chase:
That said, because this is a pure question of law on which the Plaintiffs and Defendants do not disagree, this Court should consider construing Plaintiffs’ motion as a request for summary judgment and then entering a declaratory judgment that the ACA’s provisions containing the individual mandate as well as the guaranteed- issue and community-rating requirements will all be invalid beginning on January 1, 2019.
What do you suppose the guaranteed- issue is? I'll leave that to you and google to figure out.
The plaintiffs (states) argued it was unconstitutional due to the termination of the mandated payments ("tax").
DeleteThe DoJ agrees based upon the SCOTUS ruling.
That ruling wasnt worth hanging your hat on from jump.
There's incentive to keep tinkering with it because it's a great big Democrat cudgel in the fall.
The plaintiffs (states) argued it was unconstitutional due to the termination of the mandated payments ("tax").
DeleteYes, first the GOP undermined the ACA by eliminating the "tax" provision when they passed the TCJA, which they clearly understood at the time would undermine the SCOTUS decision in National Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius (NFIB), 567 U.S. 519, 572 (2012).
And Donny the Chickenshit Coward Traitor is too fucking stupid to understand any of this anyway.
I think you can credit the election process, but they have to run again so there will be some tinkering, Tailgunner-Joe-with-Tourette's.
Delete"and you should try to reckon even with the formulation that lowering taxes is income redistribution."
DeleteHuh? What the hell are you talking about.
"but this is pithy for what I think you wanted to convey, Mao."
I have no interest in becoming expert in a trivial accounting transaction.
I'll just note that the goebbelsian nature of the above examples of establishment propaganda is beyond dispute, evident to anyone with at least a half of functioning brain present.
And that's my only point.
The bigger point is that your gaslighting only works on mouth-breathing morons, or what we like to call "Conservatives".
DeleteHello viewers my name is mis pater from USA. I got married ten years ago to the cutest and caring husband; we were blessed with two kids. We had the best home until my husband started behaving awkwardly last year. it was then i discovered that he was seeing another woman. our marriage moved from bad to worse until he eventually left the home living me with the kids. He took away my home and happiness. i had lived with sorrow, rejection and pain ever since then. not on till My friend Victoria tried to make me happy and stop me from brooding but i could not get through the incidence. it was then my friend introduced PRIEST WISDOM to me, she told me he could solve all marital and health problems. we contacted him online and i narrated my story to him. The rest is now stories because i am now back with my family, living happily than ever all thanks to PRIEST WISDOM who gave me back my home, happiness and hope. You can also contact him for ur marital and health problem contact PRIEST WISDOM through his email address: supernaturalspell@yahoo.COM or You can call/whatsapp him +2348124644470.and get you problems solved 100% assured.
DeleteAt one time they called this sort of sexual harassment "the morning after".
ReplyDeleteCecelia, please call yourself something else. You are embarrassing yourself with this crap. Incel.me wants their playmate back.
DeleteMy mother wanted to name me Cynthia, but my father insisted that people would then call me Cindy, which they both didn't like.
DeleteWhen I was in grade school I wished I had been named Roxanne.
I think we both have to settle for this name.
(burp...scratch...)
In your dreams
Delete"Olivia Megan"?
DeleteToo WASP?
Bob: I put in a salt lick, and some honeysuckle, and I noticed that the quills of the hatchlings changed the sheath of their plumage. Just like grouses and their nestlings. So, can a curved billed fledgling use its dipper to sort of gape its gizzard? Or would a chicklet in fact nourish its breastbone during migration, like scrubfowl or something? Since the culver and its eggs are vertebrates, right? The fluffy shaft expand to form feather pecking, like a turkey follicle, or something. Such as a mandible. Or is the elongated I put in a salt lick, and some honeysuckle, and I noticed that the quills of the hatchlings changed the sheath of their plumage. Just like grouses and their nestlings. So, can a curved billed fledgling use its dipper to sort of gape its gizzard? Or would a chicklet in fact nourish its breastbone during migration, like scrubfowl or something? Since the culver and its eggs are vertebrates, right? The fluffy shaft expand to form feather pecking, like a turkey follicle, or something. Such as a mandible. Or is the elongated membrane of the peafowl, like a crest feather, uh, on a cockatoo, or maybe a rose breasted cockatiel, in the muscular pouch of the gullet there. And so, I noticed the debeaking of a leghorn rousse, was sort of like a flapping mallard hatchling, and the lobular marcipals of a scrubfowl on the elongated membrane of the peafowl. Or a curved billed fledgling or the dorsal ridge of an insectivore, can develop an egg shell, actually, of the incubated chick.membrane of the peafowl, like a crest feather, uh, on a cockatoo, or maybe a rose breasted cockatiel, in the muscular pouch of the gullet there. And so, I noticed the debeaking of a leghorn rousse, was sort of like a flapping mallard hatchling, and the lobular marcipals of a scrubfowl on the elongated membrane of the peafowl. Or a curved billed fledgling or the dorsal ridge of an insectivore, can develop an egg shell, actually, of the incubated chick.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeletePerhaps this will assuage your crazy Romanian impulses. Hope you have good speakers. You'll need 'em.
DeleteCult of Personality
Leroy
That’s obnoxious, and you’re a traitorous Russian spy if you dont agree.
DeleteWell, I think that song has the best power chord I’ve ever heard.
DeleteI appreciate your link, which provided this:
“CBO projects that the rescission from the Child Enrollment Contingency Fund would not affect payments to states over the 2018-2028 period.”
Apparently, the Federal government has been banking on future needs, and I think that’s appropriate. Rescinding these obligations seems to me a bad idea, since we’re looking at a ten-year timeline.
I guess that I’m wrong about the hullabaloo over CHIP. Not the first time I’ve been wrong, won’t be the last. Now, for something completely different h/t Monty Python:
Well it's true just take a look - The cover sometimes makes the book
Leroy
Well, Gennifer, if Bill was so bad, why were you with him for 12 years, or are you just trying to resurrect your 15 minutes of fame?
ReplyDeleteI wonder how much she is being paid this time around.
ReplyDeleteis this true about Bill Clinton as a case of sexual harassment.?
ReplyDeleteSurprised at Gerber Audi Repair
I AM FINALLY FREE FROM FINANCIAL BONDAGE THANKS TO MOORE LOAN COMPANY (mooreloancompany@yahoo.com).
ReplyDeleteGood day everyone,I can’t hide this great testimony that took place in my life I will love everyone to know it and be a partaker of this, that is why I want to share it to the whole world by placing this advert on classifieds, I am Mrs Karen Brown by name, I live in Chattanooga, Tennessee United State, I want to thank ROBBINSON MOORE for his kindness upon my family life, I never knew that there is still a sincere and trustworthy lender like this on the internet and on earth. Just some days I was in search for a loan of $ 100,000.00, As I was running out of money for feeding, School fees, My business was really going out of capital and my rent. I was scammed about $15,000.00 dollars and I decided not to involve my self in such business again. But a Friend of mine introduced me to a loan firm due to my appearance and doings and also my complains to her. And I told her that I am not interested in any loan deal anymore but she told me that there is still a sincere lender who she will recommend me to, And she gave me the details of this man who is called MOORE ROBBINSON. And I really put a trial and I am most greatful and lucky today, I was given a loan amount of $95,000,00 Dollars by this great firm MOORE LOAN COMPANY. If you arew in need of a genuine, Sincere, durable and a truth worthy loan lender or financial assistance and also you know you can be reliable and trusted, capable of paying back at the due / duration time of the funds I will advice you to send your contact to them via email @[ mooreloancompany@yahoo.com] OR Text (414) 454-9493 . And you will be free from scams on the internet. Please I am begging everyone on earth to help me thank Mr ROBBINSON MOORE. And I ill always being sharing this great surprise and testimony that happened in my life everyday to all that need loans. Contact them now if you are in need of a loan: AS THEY ARE EFFICIENT,DYNAMIC AND RELAIBLE.....Again there contact email [mooreloancompany@yahoo.com OR Text (414) 454-9493.
I'm 40 years old female I tested genital herpes (HSV1-2) positive in 2016. I was having bad outbreaks. EXTREMELY PAINFUL. I have try different kinds of drugs and treatment by the medical doctors all to know was avail. Six months ago I was desperately online searching for a helpful remedies for genital herpes (HSV1-2) cure, which I come across some helpful remedies on how Dr OYAGU have help so many people in curing genital herpes (HSV1-2) with the help of herbal treatment because I too believe there is someone somewhere in the world who can cure herpes completely. At of the past 2 months, however, I've been following his herpes protocol and it stopped all outbreaks completely! To my greatest surprise I was cured completely by following the protocol of his herbal medicine . Don't be discouraged by the medical doctors. There is a cure for HSV with the help of herbs and roots by a herbalist Dr call Dr OYAGU he is so kind and truthful with his herbal treatment, kindly contact him for more information Via oyaguherbalhome@gmail.com or WhatsApp DR on +2348101755322 or visit his website https://oyaguspellcaster.wixsite.com/oyaguherbalhome you will be lucky as I am today
ReplyDelete