THE RATIONAL ANIMAL'S FICTIONS: No Mandated Tribal Claim Left Behind!

FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2020

Trump comes for Gerwig's "values:"
It seems that no one actually reads Little Women any more.

In her interesting 2018 book, Meg, Jo, Beth, Amy: The Story of Little Women and Why It Still Matters, Anne Boyd Rioux delivers the data. According to a 2012 survey, "only 0.08 percent of the 7.6 million American students surveyed had read Little Women the previous school year," Rioux reports at one point.

With math known to be hard, let's spell it out. That means that eight kids out of every ten thousand had read Louisa May Alcott's book in the previous year.

That doesn't mean that Americans kids were no longer reading the book at all. But Rioux's book includes data from various surveys, in Great Britain and the U.S., which indicate that very few contemporary kids ever read Little Women.

It isn't hard to understand why the famous book goes unread. In many ways, the highly influential book is now substantially dated. Just consider a few events the reader is asked to accept:

Jo March, the heroine of the book, marries a man who is stout. (When they meet, he's almost 40!) "Why would [Alcott] do such a thing to us?" progressive expert voices now cry.

Jo's husband is old and stout, but things get even worse. At the end of the book, the pair have opened, and are running, a school for destitute children! Modern progressives can't be expected to find their ground in such tedious conduct. Who then will recommend this tired old book to those who are young?

Sardonics aside, Alcott's text may be hard to follow for modern readers in general. Consider an event which makes Jo admire Professor Bhaer despite the fact that he's fat.

As Jo is getting to know the professor, a third party invites the pair to attend "a select symposium, held in honor of several celebrities." For the record, these are intellectual celebrities, and, despite her "reverence for genius," Jo is thoroughly "disillusioned" by what she sees and hears.

(By way of contrast, we modern progressives will always repeat whatever er see or hear.)

At any rate, in the part of the evening described below, the philosophers start to showcase their wares. Alcott reports what happened:
ALCOTT (chapter 34): Before the evening was half over, Jo felt so completely disillusioned, that she sat down in a corner to recover herself. Mr. Bhaer soon joined her, looking rather out of his element, and presently several of the philosophers, each mounted on his hobby, came ambling up to hold an intellectual tournament in the recess. The conversations were miles beyond Jo's comprehension, but she enjoyed it, though Kant and Hegel were unknown gods, the Subjective and Objective unintelligible terms, and the only thing 'evolved from her inner consciousness' was a bad headache after it was all over. It dawned upon her gradually that the world was being picked to pieces, and put together on new and, according to the talkers, on infinitely better principles than before, that religion was in a fair way to be reasoned into nothingness, and intellect was to be the only God. Jo knew nothing about philosophy or metaphysics of any sort, but a curious excitement, half pleasurable, half painful, came over her as she listened with a sense of being turned adrift into time and space, like a young balloon out on a holiday.

She looked round to see how the Professor liked it, and found him looking at her with the grimmest expression she had ever seen him wear. He shook his head and beckoned her to come away, but she was fascinated just then by the freedom of Speculative Philosophy, and kept her seat, trying to find out what the wise gentlemen intended to rely upon after they had annihilated all the old beliefs.
Jo is troubled because a bunch of philosophers are rolling their eyes at religion. Why did she come to admire Professor Bhaer despite his age and his girth? Skillfully, Alcott explains:
ALCOTT: Now, Mr. Bhaer was a diffident man and slow to offer his own opinions, not because they were unsettled, but too sincere and earnest to be lightly spoken. As he glanced from Jo to several other young people, attracted by the brilliancy of the philosophic pyrotechnics, he knit his brows and longed to speak, fearing that some inflammable young soul would be led astray by the rockets, to find when the display was over that they had only an empty stick or a scorched hand.

He bore it as long as he could, but when he was appealed to for an opinion, he blazed up with honest indignation and defended religion with all the eloquence of truth—an eloquence which made his broken English musical and his plain face beautiful. He had a hard fight, for the wise men argued well, but he didn't know when he was beaten and stood to his colors like a man. Somehow, as he talked, the world got right again to Jo. The old beliefs, that had lasted so long, seemed better than the new. God was not a blind force, and immortality was not a pretty fable, but a blessed fact. She felt as if she had solid ground under her feet again, and when Mr. Bhaer paused, outtalked but not one whit convinced, Jo wanted to clap her hands and thank him.

She did neither, but she remembered the scene, and gave the Professor her heartiest respect, for she knew it cost him an effort to speak out then and there, because his conscience would not let him be silent. She began to see that character is a better possession than money, rank, intellect, or beauty, and to feel that if greatness is what a wise man has defined it to be, "truth, reverence, and good will", then her friend Friedrich Bhaer was not only good, but great.
Professor Bhaer had been willing to stand and fight on behalf of religious belief. Weirdly, Jo "began to see that that character is a better possession than...beauty."

According to Alcott, Jo's belief that Bhaer was not only good, but great, "strengthened daily." It is at this point that Professor Bhaer tells Jo that he disapproves, as a general matter, of lurid "sensation stories."

According to Professor Matteson, this imposition of the masculine gaze causes Jo a great deal of pain, and she reacts with "indignation." Inevitably, Professor Bhaer is "largely oblivious to the depth of the pain" he has caused.

That isn't what happens in the actual book. This doesn't stop it from taking place in modern professorial fictions.

Can we talk? Modern-day 12-year-old kids would be unlikely to find their footing in events like the ones we've described. Changing intellectual and societal frameworks have almost surely made Alcott's famous text hard to track in the present day.

This may explain why modern kids aren't rushing to read Little Women. That said, the famous book, with its famous characters, can still make a profitable movie, if you just change its characters, events and values all around, while pretending to do no such thing.

With that, Hooray for Hollywood and for its endless array of graspers, hustlers and climbers! Tinseltown has made major adaptations of Alcott's text in 1933, 1949, 1994 and 2019. Those adaptations survive.

Two earlier films, from 1917 and 1918, have apparently been lost. A 2018 film adaptation crashed and burned at the box office and among the bulk of the critics, to the extent that it was reviewed at all.

Along came Gerwig's 2019 adaptation. Within our flailing progressive world, the Greta Gerwig memorial t-shirt would perhaps say this:
I made the greatest Little Women yet and all I got was this lousy $225,000 gift bag!
Poor Gerwig! For whatever reason, rightly or wrongly, her film was largely passed over in the early awards season, both by the Golden Globes and the Screen Actors Guild.

Given current tribal fictions, only one conclusion was possible—their misogyny had been showing. There followed a progressive stampede in support of the film which might be said to have run by this watchword:
No unfounded conclusion or logical bungle left behind!
How dumb is our modern progressive tribe—the tribe that is currently well on its way to losing the world to the disordered man our haplessness helped elect? This is how transplendently dumb we are and have been for a long time:

Right around Christmas time, three (3) men told the New York Times' Janet Maslin that they didn't want to see Gerwig's film. This touched off a wave of furious claims that "men" were avoiding the film.

(Hint: No film has ever been seen by all men. Also, no film has ever been seen by most men. Attendance by gender has always fluctuated based upon the subject matter of various films. Everyone understands such facts—everyone but us, Over Here, within our failing tribe.)

Rightly or wrongly, Little Women was getting scorched early on. But when Oscar nominations were announced, Gerwig's film was nominated for Best Picture. Also, Gerwig's chronologically jumbled script received a Best Screenplay nomination.

That said, Gerwig didn't receive a Best Director nomination. This "snub" was widely attributed to the Academy's sexism/misogyny, even though the same directors guild had nominated her for a Best Director Oscar just two years before.

Puzzling logic of this type would guide our stampede throughout. How outrageous was this obvious snub? With no inanity left behind, we were offered such logic as this:

We could tell that Gerwig had been snubbed for Best Director because her film had been nominated for Best Picture. We weren't told that nine films got Best Picture nominations this year, while the Academy only allows five nominations for Best Director.

We could tell that Gerwig had been snubbed for Best Director because her film had received six nominations in all. (Did the Academy think the film had directed itself?)

We weren't told that only one of the nine Best Picture films had received fewer nominations than Little Women's six. We weren't told that four of the Best Picture films had received ten or eleven noms.

We knew in our bones that this snub was a case of discrimination. We never saw anyone suggest an alternate possibility—the possibility that Gerwig, who became an official member of Hollywood royalty with Lady Bird, was being cut a break by critics and pundits because of her standing in Tinseltown.

Is it possible that Gerwig was actually being favored by critics and Tinseltown voters? Of course it is! With this, we direct you to A. O. Scott's review of the film for the New York Times.

As every critic found a way to do, Scott praised the chronological slicing-and-dicing which some viewers found quite confusing. ("It’s as if the book has been carefully cut apart and reassembled, its signatures sewn back together in an order that produces sparks of surprise and occasional bouts of pleasurable dizziness.")

Of course, one person's "pleasurable dizziness" is another's rank confusion. All three times that we've seen the film, we've been struck by how confusing it is. Then too, we've never had to issue an amusing correction like this:
Correction: Dec. 23, 2019
An earlier version of this review misidentified Beth as the youngest of the March sisters. The youngest is Amy, not Beth.
As we've noted before, we thought the casting added to the muddle. We thought the oldest sister looked like the youngest, and the youngest sister seemed like the oldest.

Scott may have been misled by the casting too! At any rate, like everyone else, Scott found a roundabout way to praise Gerwig's chronological jumbling. Perhaps in thrall to Hollywood's pecking order, he also offered this obvious nonsense:
SCOTT (12/23/19): Without resorting to self-conscious anachronism or fussy antiquarianism, Gerwig has fashioned a story that feels at once entirely true to its 19th-century origins and utterly modern.
According to Scott, the story Gerwig fashioned "feels entirely true to its 19th-century origins." And it's true—the story may feel that way to an upper-end reviewer who can't even identify the youngest sister is in a very old, very well-known story.

At any rate, the fact that the story feels that way doesn't mean that it is that way. Fawning to celebrity and bowing to power, Scott ignores the wholesale way Gerwig changes Alcott's story and values while retaining the commercial advantages conferred by the famous name of Alcott's book and the famous names of her characters.

Does Gerwig's story "feel entirely true to its 19th-century origins?" What suggestion could be more absurd? To cite one minor example:

As we've watched Gerwig's massively modernized film, we've missed the part of the story where Jo, true to her 19th century values, comes to admire Professor Bhaer because of the way he supports religious values in the face of assault from the swells.

In fairness, that's the tiniest alteration Gerwig makes to Alcott's famous text. Her most ridiculous alteration involved the statement her producer reported in an interview with the Times:

"You know we can’t actually have [Jo] marry Professor Bhaer,” Gerwig is said to have said.

We can't have her marry Bhaer! In the actual 19th century book, Jo does, in fact, marry Bhaer. They then open that school for those destitute children.

Gerwig doesn't just hurry past the school; true to her sillybill Tinseltown values, she even tries to obscure the marryin'! Instead, he has Jo publish a book, an event which doesn't occur in Alcott's original text, and she has her outfox a male editor to get the best business deal.

Along the way, Bhaer rudely criticizes her lurid tales—no, this doesn't occur in the book—and Jo hotly tells him where to shove it. That too doesn't occur in the book. In fact, Gerwig's whole film is a silly, cartoonized tale designed to give us "progressive" fanpersons a story so simple, so scripted and so tribally dumb and even we can follow it.

Plus, she casts a handsome hunk to be the professor. Yum!

For the record, one female director did win an Oscar this year for making a film about a school for destitute children. Predictably, no one has said a word about that. We'll tell you about it tomorrow.

Gerwig, a member of Tinseltown royalty, made a film which is quite different. Like Aaron Sorkin before her, she drafted behind the commercial advantage lurking within a famous title while making a tribally pleasing modern fairy tale.

She made the greatest Little Women yet and all she got was her bag of swag! Our tribe is now so hopeless, so empty, so dumb that we can spend several months having a breakdown about this horrible act of injustice conferred on a Tinseltown star.

Warning:

Donald J. Trump is coming for Gerwig's status and values. Does a tribe as simple-minded and dumb as ours have any real chance of prevailing?

Tomorrow: Woman creates film about destitute kids! But who gives a fig about them?

50 comments:

  1. Bob, Stop beating a dead horse already. Nobody cares.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello everyone. I was heartbroken because i had very small penis, not nice to satisfy a woman, i had so many relationship called off because of my situation, i have used so many product which i found online but none could offer me the help i searched for. i saw some few comments about this specialist called Dr OLU and decided to email him on drolusolutionhome@gmail.com
      so I decided to give his herbal product a try. i emailed him and he got back to me, he gave me some comforting words with his herbal pills for Penis t, Enlargement Within 5 day of it, i began to feel the enlargement of my penis, ” and now it just 2 weeks of using his products my penis is about 10 inches longer and am so happy..feel free to contact DR OLU on(drolusolutionhome@gmail.com)or whatsapp him on this number +2348140654426  

      Delete
    2. I do. I think it's some of Bob's best writing. It's also great film criticism.

      Why is it good? Because Bob's one of the few people around now who are concerned about everyone GETTING THINGS WRONG. Or, cares.

      Reminds me of one of Pauline Kael's big concerns-- why are people so wooly headed? She also easily delved into literary cross-criticism too.

      Delete
    3. Herbal Penis Enlargement product is 100% guarantee to Enlarge and get a better ERECTION DO YOU WANT AN URGENT HERBAL CREAM FOR PENIS ENLARGEMENT:CONTACT DR OLU , at drolusolutionhome@gmail.com or WhatsApp : +2348140654426 If You Are Looking For The Best Penis Enlargement Products And You Have: 1. Small Size. 2. Male Low Libido. 3. Male Impotence. 4. Laziness in the Bed. 5. Premature Ejaculation. 6. Cannot Satisfy Your Partner. 7. Or Any Other Sexual Concern. Call or whatsapp +2348140654426 FREE & FAST Delivery

      Delete
    4. i have to share this testimony to the world My Name is Angela ruth. how this great spiritual doctor helped me bring back my husband who was taken away from me and i was emotionally break down because he was the father of my kids, so i was looking for help so i meant this great man who told me not to worry again
      that everything will be solve so i have to put faith in him and he gave me (3)three day that my husband will come back to me, and exactly to what he said my husband came back to pleading to me that he was under a spell so i urge you all who is looking for any kind of help to contact him, he is geniue, He dose not disappoint and i want you all to be careful who you contact because they are scammers all over the internet clamming to be a spell caster and take your money and never cast the spell so i want you all seeking for any problem he is a real spell caster because he inherit from his ancestors so he is geniue. contact him through his Email address : moneytemple@outlook.com You can also Call/Whats App:+447482854279
      You can also visit his website:https://thetempleofmoney.com/ 
















      i have to share this testimony to the world My Name is Angela ruth. how this great spiritual doctor helped me bring back my husband who was taken away from me and i was emotionally break down because he was the father of my kids, so i was looking for help so i meant this great man who told me not to worry again
      that everything will be solve so i have to put faith in him and he gave me (3)three day that my husband will come back to me, and exactly to what he said my husband came back to pleading to me that he was under a spell so i urge you all who is looking for any kind of help to contact him, he is geniue, He dose not disappoint and i want you all to be careful who you contact because they are scammers all over the internet clamming to be a spell caster and take your money and never cast the spell so i want you all seeking for any problem he is a real spell caster because he inherit from his ancestors so he is geniue. contact him through his Email address : moneytemple@outlook.com You can also Call/Whats App:+447482854279
      You can also visit his website:https://thetempleofmoney.com/ 

      Delete
    5. EFFECTIVE AND POWERFUL LOVE SPELL CASTER AND LOTTERY SPELL DR.OJOKASPELLTEMPLE@GMAIL. COM OR WHATSAPP HIM :+2348144172934  I am sharing this testimony to partners suffering in their relationships because there is an enduring solution. My husband left me and our 2 kids for another woman for 3 years. I tried to be strong just for my kids but I could not control the pains that torment my heart. I was hurt and confused. I needed a help, so i did a research on the internet and came across a site where I saw that Dr. Ojoka a spell caster, can help get lovers back. I contacted him and he did a special prayer and spells for me. To my surprises, after some days, my husband came back home. That was how we reunited again and there was a lot of love, joy and peace in the family. You can as well contact Dr. Ojoka , a powerful spell-caster for solutions on his contact dr.ojokaspelltemple@gmail. com or directly on Whats App: +2348144172934

      Delete
    6. Hello everybody, thanks to Dr LOSA the spell caster i am from USA, i don't just Know the reason why some people is finding it difficult to believe that there is a cure for HIV, my son have been suffering from HIV since last three years but today i am happy that he is cure from it with the herbal medicine of Dr DR LOSA the great healer,i was browsing the INTERNET searching for help when i came across a testimony shared by someone on how Dr LOSA cure his herpes i was so much in need of getting his treatment but after all Dr LOSA brought a smile to my son face with his herbal medicine. i am so much happy today that we have someone like this great healer out there, so my people out there kindly contact this great healer on his email address: (dr.losaherbalhome@gmail .com) please sir keep your good work cause there are people out there who is in need of your healing medicine.once more email him now: (dr.losaherbalhome@gmail.com) you can call him OR WHATSSAPP HIM +2349056464736
      DOCTOR LOSA CAN AS WELL CURE THE FOLLOWING DISEASE:-
      1. HIV/AIDS
      2. HERPES
      3. CANCER
      4. ALS
      5. Hepatitis
      6 Diabetes
      7 LOVE SPELL
      8 IF YOU NEED YOUR EX LOVER BACK TO LOVE YOU AGAIN.






























































      Delete
    7. My mouth is short of words, i am so happy because Dr Obela has healed me from Herpes which i have been suffering from the past 5years now, i have spend a lot when getting drugs from the hospital to keep me healthy, i have tried all means in life to always become herpes virus negative one day, but there was no answer until i found Dr Obela the parish of African who provide me some healing herbs that i uses , now i am glad telling everyone that i am now Herpes Negative, i am very happy, thank you Dr Obela for helping my life comes back newly without any form of crisis, may the good lord that i serve blessed you Dr Obela and equip you to the higher grade for healing my life. i am so amazed. so i will announced to everyone in this whole world that is Herpes Virus positive to please follow my advice and get healed on time, because we all knows that Herpes disease is a deadly type, contact Dr Obela for your Herpes healing herbs today at: drobelaspellhome@gmail.com He will be always happy to assist you online and ensure you get healed on time, contact Dr Obela today for your healing herbs immediately, you can also add him on whatsApp +2347084171950 ............ THANKS TO DR OBELA

      Delete
  2. “Our tribe is now so hopeless, so empty, so dumb that we can spend several months having a breakdown about this horrible act of injustice conferred on a Tinseltown star.”

    No, Bob. That would be you having the breakdown about this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a horrible movie. But, a great example of modern-day inanity. You either get it or you don't.

      Changing the professor to a young French stud for instsnce is ludicrously hypocritical when it comes to wanting to extoll the independence of women. And that's just for starters.

      Delete
  3. Bob Somerby,

    Still whistling past the graveyard, I see.

    ReplyDelete
  4. “Changing intellectual and societal frameworks have almost surely made Alcott's famous text hard to track in the present day.”

    If this is true, then Alcott’s book joins many others whose appeal has diminished over time.

    It is safe to assume that Gerwig’s film will encourage many to read the book or re-read it.

    Somerby doesn’t give his opinion about whether the book *should* be read.

    But it is objectionable for him to impute values or motives to Gerwig that are crass or “tribal.” She has stated that she loved Alcott’s book as a child (and she is only 36), and that she greatly admires Alcott herself. Gerwig is hardly likely to have approached her movie as a hit job on Alcott or the book. If Somerby is correct, that the book has fallen out of favor for various reasons, then Gerwig is doing what she can to revive interest in it.

    And the reasons that Gerwig admired the book are viciously dismissed or ignored by Crazy Bob. He projects his own morass of objections to “modern progressive values” onto Gerwig.

    And the irony is that the book which meant so much and was so influential to Gerwig most likely meant nothing to Somerby. If he even read it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What's ironic is that you criticize TDH for imputing things to Gerwig to guess her state of mind, and then you proceed to accuse him of projection and speculate about how little the novel meant to him.

      No, no, not ironic. What's that other word?

      Oh, yeah. Idiotic.

      Delete
    2. The book obviously meant nothing to him. If it had, he wouldn't have had to be dragged to see the film, as he self-reports he was (by female relatives). Use all of the evidence available to you, deadrat.

      Delete
    3. If Somerby had read the book, Gerwig's timeline wouldn't have bothered him so much, since he would already be familiar with the plot.

      If Somerby had read the book, he would be able to tell the girls apart based on their character and personality -- they are maximally different. Instead he complains he cannot tell them apart. This is like a woman who says she cannot tell apart Leonardo diCaprio and Brad Pitt. Patently ridiculous unless the only thing you use to tell women apart is looks, which is pretty superficial, even for Somerby. This is another reason why I suspect he may be on the autism spectrum.

      Delete
    4. Gerwig then obviously didn't understand the book, whose subtle theme makes her movie version look dumb and cartoonish.

      Yeah, you go girl, you Jo!

      Delete
  5. "Does a tribe as simple-minded and dumb as ours have any real chance of prevailing?"

    Why, we sure hope it doesn't.

    But then it appears that your sponsors don't trust you zombies anymore, so they are recruiting the actual globalist bankster, Michael "Mike" Bloomberg. Get with the program, dear Bob.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ************
      WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump will be the guest of honor at a Saturday fundraiser at the palatial Palm Beach estate of billionaire Nelson Peltz. Trump’s fellow guests: donors who gave $580,600 per couple to support the president’s reelection, making it the most expensive such fundraising event since Trump took office.

      https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/trump-to-headline-580600-per-couple-fundraiser-the-most-expensive-of-his-reelection-bid/
      ***************

      There you go. Mao and his elite billionaire club.

      Delete
    2. Thank you, dear Hillary. If it's true, this is a good news indeed.

      Doesn't come close to the billions shelled out by your massa Soros, massa Bezos and massa Bloomberg, unfortunately. But hey, it's still something.

      Delete
    3. Mao, do you have any clue what "massa" means?

      Delete
    4. Oh dear, Melania, I see that mm has insulted you, by pointing out how stupid your obsequious sycophancy toward our present POTUS is. When you have no answer, you revert, 8th grade style, to dubbing him "Hillary." He owes you an apology.

      Delete
    5. Mao,
      Have you, yet,decided how you are going to spend the Social Security benefit deduction Trump is promising you?

      Delete
  6. Only one interpretation of a book is allowed. Bob Somerby’s. Anything else is malignant progressive “values”, ostentatious quote marks courtesy of BS.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There's nothing progressive about crassly substituting a young French looker for an old German professor.

      No, it's Louis B. Mayer time. Worse, really, because MGM at least had great non-teen character actors. I.e., real adults.

      Delete
  7. I don’t remember girls reading Alcott when I was a child, let alone in this century.

    I read her in sixth grade because my grandmother bought me a set of her books and since my father was anti-tv, there was nothing else to do but read or chat after it got dark. (I appreciate my father for that now. I didn’t then.)

    I do remember that at one point, not too long ago, that if you read anything about Alcott it was something in the tenor of her having had religious beliefs that were cultish and not traditional at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Her father had religious beliefs that were cultish and not traditional. Alcott rejected those views.

      Delete
    2. Yes, I think you can see that in the use of Pilgrim's Progress as a reference to the daily struggles of the March family.

      I don't think it was transcendentalism that was held against pre-feminist icon Alcott. It was the obvious struggle that consumed her. The grinding away of an up-tight as well as headstrong temperament via the strength of character it took in embracing times of subservient devotion.

      That had yet to be minimized and was strange and unsettling to many people.

      Delete
  8. “We were puzzled”
    “we watched the debate”
    “if we might borrow from”
    “we watched the debate”
    “we found it hard to believe”
    “we thought”
    “We well remember”
    “we saw it”
    “We could end up”
    “We used to write reports”
    “we realized there was no point”

    We! We! We! We! We! We! We! We! We! We! We!

    Somerby is in the running for narcissist of the year, along with Rachel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Psst! It's his personal blog containing his personal ruminations and his personal opinions on things that matter to him personally.

      Delete
    2. That doesn't make him less of a narcissist.

      Delete
    3. You're not very good at this reasoning thing, are you, @10:57A?

      TDH's narcissism would be his inappropriate concern with himself. His personality state is what it is no matter what he writes. Evidence for that narcissism cannot be gleaned from first pronoun references in exposition that is designed to elaborate on personal feelings, thoughts, and judgments.

      Do you find yourself throwing down autobiographies thinking, "The book is entirely too much taken up with stuff about the author"?

      Delete
    4. Did you skip the part where Somerby called Rachel a narcissist for using the first-person pronoun too often?

      Delete
    5. Did you miss the part where RM is supposed to do a show about US politics and not a vanity podcast?

      You're really not good on this reasoning thing.

      Delete
    6. deadrat,
      Those aren't Somerby's thoughts. He cribbed them from a Right-wing grievance screed.

      Delete
  9. Don't worry Bob the mayor who unsuccessfully ran Indiana's fourth largest city will save us.

    ReplyDelete
  10. ""only 0.08 percent of the 7.6 million American students surveyed had read Little Women the previous school year," Rioux reports at one point."

    This is silly. It only counts students who read the book in the previous year, not kids who had read the book ever in their lives. This means the book wasn't being assigned in English classes. High school is too old for the book. Kids in high school are reading dytopian YA fiction, not classics about young girls. I read Little Women when I was in elementary school. This survey is like asking how many high school kids read Winnie the Pooh in the previous year, and then concluding that kids no longer like the book.

    And then Somerby excerpts the parts of the book where the Professor earns Jo's respect. Not coincidentally, the Professor is just like Alcott's own father, obviously modeled on him. Her father was an itinerant preacher, described as flakey and eccentric, and Alcott grew up surrounded by Transcendentalists such as Thoreau and Emerson. In describing Jo's introduction to intellectual salons, it is as if Alcott is portraying the discussions she experienced in her own youth, among her parents' circle. And she rejects it in the book (through Jo), as she did in life.

    But Somerby sees this as an affirmation of traditional, conservative values. It is not. She is rejecting her father not least because of the poverty she experienced because he failed to take care of her and her sisters (again mirrored in the book). Somerby is cherry picking this scene to suggest that Alcott abandoned feminism. Alcott saw Jo as a sell out, not a role model. Alcott said so. But Somerby ignores things that Alcott said about her own book and characters in order to take the compromise forced on Alcott by her publisher and use that to claim that Gerwig has distorted the book. Just as Somerby refuses to acknowledge Harper Lee's own intentions, in order to attack Sorkin. Somerby has his own agenda that he is imposing on both books, in order to denigrate all liberals. Literature wasn't created for that purpose.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Not a word from Somerby about the French Oscars nominating the latest film of Roman Polanski, a convicted child rapist who fled the country before sentencing, who is still wanted in the US. Is it right to give awards to men who sexually abuse children?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll go out on a limb here and say it's not right to give them awards for sexually abusing children.

      Delete
    2. At least deadrat isn't a Conservative.

      Delete
    3. I'll say it's ok.

      She doesn't mind. Why should anyone else?

      Delete
  12. "Gerwig, a member of Tinseltown royalty, made a film which is quite different."

    Gerwig is not a member of Tinseltown royalty. She works in film.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Strong And Powerful Love Spell To Win Your Ex Back.. I have decided that i am going to spend the whole day on the internet just to make sure that a lot of people are able to read this my testimony about Dr.happy who is a powerful spell caster from Africa, After been abandon by my lover i was so lonely that very day that i decided to go through the net for some relationships tips, I never knew that this was the road map that will secure the return of my lover. After reading a lot of tips on how to restore my relationship in a more better way i discovered that Dr.happy has a lot of recommendation than other spell casters, So with this i had my mind made up that Dr.happy was the right person for the job, And i contacted Dr.happy through his details which i saw on the internet and i was so happy that i chose to work with Dr.happy because his work was 100% perfect and the spell brought my lover back to me with fast relief you can also contact him for help now email.. happylovespell2@gmail.com
    Website...happylovespell2.webnode.com/
    Whatsapp/cal +2348133873774

    ReplyDelete
  14. EFFECTIVE AND POWERFUL LOVE SPELL CASTER AND LOTTERY SPELL DR.OJOKASPELLTEMPLE@GMAIL. COM OR WHATSAPP HIM :+2348144172934  I am sharing this testimony to partners suffering in their relationships because there is an enduring solution. My husband left me and our 2 kids for another woman for 3 years. I tried to be strong just for my kids but I could not control the pains that torment my heart. I was hurt and confused. I needed a help, so i did a research on the internet and came across a site where I saw that Dr. Ojoka a spell caster, can help get lovers back. I contacted him and he did a special prayer and spells for me. To my surprises, after some days, my husband came back home. That was how we reunited again and there was a lot of love, joy and peace in the family. You can as well contact Dr. Ojoka , a powerful spell-caster for solutions on his contact dr.ojokaspelltemple@gmail. com or directly on Whats App: +2348144172934

    ReplyDelete
  15. My mouth is short of words, i am so happy because Dr Obela has healed me from Herpes which i have been suffering from the past 5years now, i have spend a lot when getting drugs from the hospital to keep me healthy, i have tried all means in life to always become herpes virus negative one day, but there was no answer until i found Dr Obela the parish of African who provide me some healing herbs that i uses , now i am glad telling everyone that i am now Herpes Negative, i am very happy, thank you Dr Obela for helping my life comes back newly without any form of crisis, may the good lord that i serve blessed you Dr Obela and equip you to the higher grade for healing my life. i am so amazed. so i will announced to everyone in this whole world that is Herpes Virus positive to please follow my advice and get healed on time, because we all knows that Herpes disease is a deadly type, contact Dr Obela for your Herpes healing herbs today at: drobelaspellhome@gmail.com He will be always happy to assist you online and ensure you get healed on time, contact Dr Obela today for your healing herbs immediately, you can also add him on whatsApp +2347084171950 ............ THANKS TO DR OBELA

    ReplyDelete
  16. Good day to all viewer online am so happy sharing this great testimony on how i was checking for solution in the internet then miraculously i came Across Dr.LOSA the powerful herbalist that Cure Numerous individuals Herpes Simplex Virus,so I contacted him base on the testimonies I?m seeing about him on the internet, I was cured too by him, kindly contact him actoday through his email he can help you email ; dr.losaherbalhome@gmail.com and so he can cure types of diseases like,HEPATITIS B,DIABETICS,CANCER,HPV,LOW SPERM CAM HIV/STDS FIBROSIS LOST OF WEIGHT .. all thank to you Dr LOSA for your kindly help in my life his Mobile number +2349056464736

    He cure listed diseases
    CANCER
    HEPATITIS A AND B
    DIABETIC.
    HERPES

    ReplyDelete
  17. I Want To Appreciate Dr.OYAGU for hs great deeds, I Was Diagnosed With type 2 Herpes Virus Last year,And Was Looking For Solution To Be Cured Luckily I Saw Testimonies On How Dr.OYAGU Cure Herpes Virus I Decided To Contact Dr.OYAGU I Contacted Him He Prepared A Herbal Medicine Portion And Sent It To Me,I Started The Herbal Medicine For My Health.He Gave Me Step By Step Instructions On How To Apply It, When I Applied It As Instructed, I Was Cured Of This Deadly Herpes Within 2 weeks, I Am Now Herpes Negative.My Brother And Sister I No That There Are So Many People That Have There Same Herpes Virus Please contact Dr OYAGU To Help You Too,And Help Me To Thank Dr.OYAGU For Cure Me, I’m Cured By Dr. OYAGU Herbal Medicine,His Contact Email:oyaguherbalhome@gmail.com

    Or Cell Whatsapp Number +2348101755322 thank you

    ReplyDelete
  18. I have to say wholeheartedly I believe Oniha is a gifted individual and gentle in his second nature. I have received the most rewarding and spiritual experience whilst conversing with him on the telephone. I heard and saw an angel in my mind-eye it was so overwhelming. I knew at the moment finally my difficulties were over. He deserves recognition for his power and talents as a beautiful individual who brings spirit close to those in need. I have been touched deeply,nothing has come as close to me before. I am in total awe and have a great deal of respect. Thank you Dr Oniha for reuniting me with my estranged husband. Anyone who needs relationship help should contact this man and he will help you. 
    EMAIL: ONIHASPELLTEMPLE@GMAIL.COM
    WHATSAPP: +16692213962

    ReplyDelete
  19. I'm happy my life is back, What a wonderful and simple spell thrower who brought joy and happiness back into my life! I want to thank DR IDUMEBO for the great thing he has done in my life, he brought happiness back into my life, I never believed in spell throwers until my life collapsed when my 6 year relationship old lover decided to quit when we wanted to get married. I was so emotionally devastated that I couldn't do anything reasonable, after 5 months of pain before an old friend of mine introduced me to an online spell thrower called Dr. IDUMEBO, that was after being scammed by various fake spell throwers who told me them could help me heal my broken relationship. I was introduced to DR IDUMEBO a real spell thrower. My God after 3 days I saw wonders, my love called me and came back to me and my life came back like a completed puzzle, and we are happily married and it was like a dream for me because I thought I'd lost it forever. Thank you DR IDUMEBO for helping me, but above all, your honesty and your results quickly and accurate. e-mail: Dridumebospellhome@gmail.com You can also Whatsapp or call him +2347049668119! You deserve to be happy because i am happy

    ReplyDelete
  20. There is a great herbal man called Dr voodoo who can cure Hepatitis B virus and other deadly diseases with the use of natural herbs to cure Hepatitis B virus problems. He is from Africa and he is a great doctor and he can also cure you as well if you are have the problem And other deadly disease and here is email address voodoospelltemple66@gmail.com or Whatsapp +2348140120719 HERPES CURE,CANCER CURE,HIV/AIDS CURE,HPV CURE

    ReplyDelete