DUELING DISPROPORTIONS: Selective coverage of shooting deaths...

THURSDAY, JULY 30, 2020

...meets a second, large disproportion:
As a matter of theory, news orgs should try to avoid creating misperceptions.

They should especially try to avoid creating large misperceptions. And not only that!

They should try to avoid creating large misperceptions about extremely important topics. In theory, that's what journalists, and journalism itself, should sensibly try to do.

We offer all that as theory. In practice, we'd be inclined to offer this judgment:

On the topic of death at the hands of police officers, we'd have to say that our major news orgs have been doing a very poor job.

Dating at least to 2012, our news orgs have devoted massive attention to some such events, but only if the person who dies is black. If the person who dies is white, Hispanic or "other"—we're using the Washington Post's terminology—our news orgs have tended to avoid discussing such incidents at all.

As a result of this remarkable practice, everyone has heard of Rayshard Brooks, as is completely appropriate. But to this day, no one on the face of the earth has heard of Nicholas Bils.

Everyone has heard of Breonna Taylor, and indeed everyone should have. But no one has heard of Rhogena Nicholas—or of her husband, Dennis Tuttle, who was shot and killed alongside her.

For perfectly sensible reasons, the whole world has seen the videotape of the late George Floyd as he died in Minneapolis, facedown in the street. But no one has heard of Tony Timpa. He died facedown in the street in Dallas, crying for his life.

There are many other examples. No one has ever heard of John Geer or of Bijan Ghaisar, despite endless attempts by the Washington Post editorial board to call attention to the peculiar circumstances of their shooting deaths.

The Post wrote endless editorials, but the national press corps wasn't buying. Anyone with an ounce of sense knows why the corps took a pass.

On June 11, Professor McWhorter rattled off other examples in this essay at Quillette. Because the essay didn't appear in The Atlantic, Atlantic readers were spared the indignity of possibly being exposed to those other names.

By normal standards, this would be a stunning example of absurdly selective press coverage. Somewhat ironically, it echoes part of our nation's brutal history, in which some lives mattered and other lives didn't, based wholly on issues of "race," a conceptual framework which comes to us live and direct from "the world the slaveholders made."

Does this highly selective press coverage make sense? As always, opinions will differ.

Almost surely, though, this vastly selective presentation has been creating vast misperceptions, some of them deeply harmful. As our reports continue, we'll take a stab at what those misperceptions might be. For today, we'l only say this:

Sometimes, the American people get to hear an occasional accurate fact. Recently, an accurate statement emerged from the world's least likely source.

A journalist who's a food decent person asked a rather peculiar question. In fairness, her question conformed to the highly selective journalistic practice described above.

A journalist asked a peculiar question. In reply, the American president, Donald J. Trump, made an accurate statement!

When has he ever done that before? The recent exchange went like this:
HERRIDGE (7/14/20): Let's talk about George Floyd. You said George Floyd's death was a terrible thing.

TRUMP: Terrible.

HERRIDGE: Why are African-Americans still dying at the hands of law enforcement in this country?

TRUMP: So are white people. So are white people. What a terrible question to ask. So are white people. More white people, by the way. More white people.
As usual, Trump assailed the journalist for having asked the question. In this case, though, the journalist's question really was rather odd—and the commander in chief had responded by making an accurate statement!

It's true! More white people actually are "dying at the hands of police." The Washington Post's Fatal Force site attempts to record all incidents in which people are shot and killed by police. From 2015 through the present day, their totals look like this:
People shot and killed by police, 2015 to present
White: 2,502
Black: 1,305
Hispanic: 910
Other: 220
Unknown [race/ethnicity]: 552
"Other" people are largely Native Americans, Asian-Americans and (or so it would seem) people of Middle Eastern heritage. For whatever reason, the number of "Unknowns" has grown exponentially, year after year.

(In 2015, Unknowns were only 2.8% of the total number killed. In 2019, the number stood at 14.3%. In this way, the Fatal Force data have become less useful over the years.)

At any rate, Trump's statement was factually accurate. According to the Fatal Force site, police shoot and kill roughly twice as many people of the one group, as compared to people of the other group.

For ourselves, we can't find fault with Commander Trump for making his testy statement. While it comported to current press practice, Herridge's question might easily have fed a rather large misperception.

Beyond that, her question might feed the peculiar idea that only one class of shooting deaths matter. We wouldn't have scolded her as Trump did, but it seems to us that his accurate statement also made perfect sense.

Amazingly, Trump made an accurate statement—but he didn't make every accurate statement. Lying behind his accurate statement, a statistical disproportion exists—and at New York magazine, Matt Stieb proceeded to state it.

Warning! Stieb's statements weren't all perfectly accurate, but he did state a basic point. In the main, here's what he said:
STIEB (7/14/20): The president’s answer ignores the basic demographics of the country over which he presides. As CBS News’ Wesley Lowery noted in 2016, the most recent census data shows that there are almost 160 million more white people in the U.S. than there are Black people. White Americans make up around 62 percent of the population, but 49 percent of those killed by police officers; Black Americans make up 13 percent of the population, but represent 24 percent of those killed by police officers. According to a database compiled by the Washington Post, 1,301 Black people have been killed by the police since 2015, while 2,495 whites were killed. But because of the vast demographic differences, Black Americans are killed at a rate more than twice that of white Americans.
The commander's statement was perfectly accurate. So, it would seem, is Stieb's basic claim, in which "black Americans are killed at a rate more than twice that of white Americans."

That's a large disproportion too. This second disproportion would also be part of any serious attempt to discuss this highly important topic, though there's little chance that we'll ever see any such widespread discussion within our upper-end press corps, which runs on Storyline.

The passage we've posted does contain a few flaws. In our worst moments, we'd say it reflects the slapdash lack of effort our tribe brings to any attempt to discuss or critique this memorized Storyline.

For starters, Stieb was working directly from this analysis piece by Lowery in 2016. Stating the obvious, "the most recent census data" from 2016 are not the most recent today.

Last July, the Census Bureau estimated that (non-Hispanic) whites represent 60.1% percent of the country's population. The correct number may have been 62% in 2016, but it isn't now.

Beyond that, Lowery seems to have understated the percentage of "white" people's deaths. According to the Fatal Force site he helped create, 51.8% percent of 2016's shooting deaths involved victims who were "white."

(For obvious reasons, we're only considering those shooting deaths where the victim's race/ethnicity was known.)

Overall, "whites" constitute 51% of the Fatal Force shooting deaths from 2015 to the present. Whites probably constituted 61% of the nation's population over that period of time.

On a strictly statistical basis, that's a bit of a "white advantage." It's also true that blacks are shot and killed by police officers at a highly disproportional rate.

Over the course of the past six years, "blacks" have constituted roughly 13% of the U.S. population, but they represent 26.4% of all shooting deaths in the Fatal Force data. This second disproportion—a statistical disproportion—is in that sense quite large.

In truth, a great deal remains to be said about that disproportion. Tomorrow, we'll consider some factors cited by McWhorter, and also by a second figure too vile to be named at this time.

That said, our flailing tribe has a Storyline and, as humans tend to do, we prefer to stick to it. We seem to be following a certain type of logic, in which the statistical disproportion we've just cited justifies a vast disproportion in coverage—a vast disproportion in which only one class of deaths gets mentioned in public at all.

Tremendous misperceptions will arise from that practice. But then again, who really cares? The woods are lovely, dark and deep, but we humans love Storyline and tend to dump everything else.

Professor Cobb and Reverend Sharpton have recently seemed to say that actually all deaths matter. Is it possible that Cobb and Sharpton are right? Is it possible that current press practice is stupid, faux, phony and wrong?

Tomorrow: Brutal history; deaths of despair

30 comments:

  1. Holy Zimmerman's (but not Martin's) right to defend himself, the attention BLM is getting, is driving Somerby crazy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Martin had a right too, beginning at a certain point. Problem is Zimmerman was packing and Martin wanted to fight.

      Delete
    2. Under Florida law, it's possible that both men had the "right to defend" themselves, i.e., to employ legally-permissible deadly force. Only two men ever knew the circumstances of their encounter, and only one survived. In particular, we don't know what Martin "wanted."

      Delete
    3. Hello everyone i want to testify of the great and powerful spell caster named Priest Ade who brought back my ex who left me and got engaged to another girl,We where happy together when all of a sudden he just change he used to call me every morning and and night before going to bed but all that stopped when i call him he yell at me and told me he didn't want to have anything to do with me anymore i was so sad and confused i didn't know what to do then i went online to search on how to get back my ex then i found an article where someone was talking about how the great and powerful Priest Ade helped her and she left his email address i took it and contacted him i told him my problem he only smiled and told me to relax everything will be OK i did everything he asked me to do and he assured me that after 24hrs he will be back,To my greatest surprise the next morning it was my boyfriend he came back knelling and begging for me to accept him back now we are so happy together he can also help you contact him

      ancientspiritspellcast@yahoo.com or ancientspiritspellcast@gmail.com 

      https://priestade.blogspot.com

      View more on YouTube: https://youtu.be/jWta3jLP_fo

      WhatsApp +2347059715465






      Hello everyone i want to testify of the great and powerful spell caster named Priest Ade who brought back my ex who left me and got engaged to another girl,We where happy together when all of a sudden he just change he used to call me every morning and and night before going to bed but all that stopped when i call him he yell at me and told me he didn't want to have anything to do with me anymore i was so sad and confused i didn't know what to do then i went online to search on how to get back my ex then i found an article where someone was talking about how the great and powerful Priest Ade helped her and she left his email address i took it and contacted him i told him my problem he only smiled and told me to relax everything will be OK i did everything he asked me to do and he assured me that after 24hrs he will be back,To my greatest surprise the next morning it was my boyfriend he came back knelling and begging for me to accept him back now we are so happy together he can also help you contact him

      ancientspiritspellcast@yahoo.com or ancientspiritspellcast@gmail.com 

      https://priestade.blogspot.com

      View more on YouTube: https://youtu.be/jWta3jLP_fo

      WhatsApp +2347059715465






      Hello everyone i want to testify of the great and powerful spell caster named Priest Ade who brought back my ex who left me and got engaged to another girl,We where happy together when all of a sudden he just change he used to call me every morning and and night before going to bed but all that stopped when i call him he yell at me and told me he didn't want to have anything to do with me anymore i was so sad and confused i didn't know what to do then i went online to search on how to get back my ex then i found an article where someone was talking about how the great and powerful Priest Ade helped her and she left his email address i took it and contacted him i told him my problem he only smiled and told me to relax everything will be OK i did everything he asked me to do and he assured me that after 24hrs he will be back,To my greatest surprise the next morning it was my boyfriend he came back knelling and begging for me to accept him back now we are so happy together he can also help you contact him

      ancientspiritspellcast@yahoo.com or ancientspiritspellcast@gmail.com 

      https://priestade.blogspot.com

      View more on YouTube: https://youtu.be/jWta3jLP_fo

      WhatsApp +2347059715465

      Delete


    4. HOW I GOT MY HUSBAND BACK WITH THE HELP OF PRIEST WISDOM CONTACT ON WHATS_APP NUMBER +2348124644470


      This is my testimony about the good work of priest wisdom who help me ... I'm Ann Earnis from north Carolina USA. And am sorry for putting this on net but i will have to, by this world best spell caster that brought back my husband who left me out for past 3 years, i eventually met this man on a blog site posting by one of is client for help, i explained everything to him and he told me about a spell caster that he had heard about and he gave me an email address to write to the spell caster to tell him my problems. In just 1 days, my husband was back to me. I just want to say thank you to this truthful and sincere spell caster, sir all you told me have come to pass and thank you sir. Please I want to tell everyone who is looking for any solution to their problem, I advise you to kindly consult this spell caster, he is real,he is powerful and whatever the spell caster tells is what will happen, because all what the spell caster told me came to pass. You can kindly contact him on: his email address is supernaturalspell1@gmail.com or directly on whats-app +2348124644470  https://supernaturalspell21.blogspot.com/






















      HOW I GOT MY HUSBAND BACK WITH THE HELP OF PRIEST WISDOM CONTACT ON WHATS_APP NUMBER +2348124644470


      This is my testimony about the good work of priest wisdom who help me ... I'm Ann Earnis from north Carolina USA. And am sorry for putting this on net but i will have to, by this world best spell caster that brought back my husband who left me out for past 3 years, i eventually met this man on a blog site posting by one of is client for help, i explained everything to him and he told me about a spell caster that he had heard about and he gave me an email address to write to the spell caster to tell him my problems. In just 1 days, my husband was back to me. I just want to say thank you to this truthful and sincere spell caster, sir all you told me have come to pass and thank you sir. Please I want to tell everyone who is looking for any solution to their problem, I advise you to kindly consult this spell caster, he is real,he is powerful and whatever the spell caster tells is what will happen, because all what the spell caster told me came to pass. You can kindly contact him on: his email address is supernaturalspell1@gmail.com or directly on whats-app +2348124644470  https://supernaturalspell21.blogspot.com/

      .........

      Delete
  2. One problem with Trump's candidacy is that he killed a hundred thousand Americans and put the country into a Depression in his first term.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello and Greetings to you Anon 12:28,

      My sources say that you have been pre-selected and pre-approved for a no upfront cost enrollment in our new program.

      This program is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that nobody would want to pass up if pre-selected as you are!

      What is this program, you ask?

      Well, it is an invitation to rub elbows with the top brass of the GOP.

      That's right, for no cost you will be invited to all of the top Trump fundraising parties.

      All of your dreams have come true, so hold tight and more information will be provided in the comments of a future post as to how to enroll.

      Walter

      Delete
  3. Is today the day Mao realized Trump is cooked?

    ReplyDelete
  4. “Somewhat ironically, it echoes part of our nation's brutal history, in which some lives mattered and other lives didn't, based wholly on issues of "race," a conceptual framework which comes to us live and direct from "the world the slaveholders made."”

    Somerby is pushing the idea that the press, by heavily covering black deaths at the hands of police, is saying that non-black lives don’t matter. This ties into his contention that liberals, by siding with civil rights in the 1960’s and opposing racism, hate the white working class.

    Somerby’s views don’t stand up to any real scrutiny.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is this trolling, parody, or stupidity? I can't tell.

      Delete
    2. Is that supposed to be some sort of rebuttal, deadrat? That you are too dense to tell what the comment intends?

      Please feel free to explain what Somerby feels is ironic about the press exclusively covering black deaths at the hands of police in the context of his remark about some lives mattering and some not mattering while keeping in mind the notion that they are pushing a Storyline.

      Delete
    3. Also, deadrat, feel free to point out a Somerby post where he disagrees with the idea, often stated by him, that liberals hate “the others’ and that by “the others” he means the white working class. For extra points, you can explain what he means when he says that liberals went off the rails 50 years ago.

      Delete
    4. No, it's not a rebuttal. Is it that you don't know what a rebuttal is or that you can't determine whether something is a rebuttal when you read it?

      What about "I can't tell" is a mystery to you?

      If the comment @2:34 is trolling, I plan to ignore it; if the comment is parody, I plan to applaud it; if it's just stupidity meant to be taken at face value, then I'll gainsay it.

      Clear now?

      Delete
    5. I'm the wrong guy to ask for an explanation of what TDH "feels," but what he points out is that the reporters' concentration on one racial side of a story is the mirror image of our society's history of ignoring that side. That is, we shouldn't ignore police misconduct against white people any more than we should have ignored the conduct against black people say, during the Golden Age of Lynching (ca 1872 - ca 1942).

      Why would TDH disagree with an idea that's "often stated by him"?

      By "the others," I think TDH means people who disagree with liberals, which includes some not members of the "white working class." Do you think he's wrong? I'm hoping to celebrate my 50th year of voting against Republicans, but you'll have to take my word for that and for my credientials as a liberal. And I hate the others.

      I can try to explain what TDH meant about "liberals off the rails" if you'll point me to the text.

      Delete
    6. gainsay = Dunning-Kruger red flag.

      Delete
  5. “The Post wrote endless editorials, but the national press corps wasn't buying. Anyone with an ounce of sense knows why the corps took a pass.”

    The Post, along with the NYT, is one of the most important national news outlets. Their “endless” editorials therefore indicate that the “national press corps” did not take a pass.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "For whatever reason, the number of "Unknowns" has grown exponentially, year after year."

    Why, hopefully it's because more and more people reject your liberal-hitlerian classifications, and view themselves as simply Americans, dear Bob. Or, better yet, as simply humyns.

    And if it's true, then your liberal-hitlerian cult is finished, as race- and gender-mongering is its only M.O., dear Bob.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Liberal-Hitlerian! I couldn't have put it better myself. But then I rely upon you, dear Mao, to coin such splendidly apt phrases. Yes, it's so true, liberals are EXACTLY like Hitler. I must confess that such a pairing never occurred to me before. Thank you for opening my eyes.

      Gao

      Delete
    2. Speaking of hitler cults:

      http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2016/1/24/putin-personality-cult-russians-obsessed.html

      Delete
  7. Why is Somerby only talking about shooting deaths? George Floyd, Eric Garner, Sandra Bland, Elijah McClain...none of them were shot. And Trayvon Martin was not shot by police.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The media, mainstream and otherwise, would not be talking about any of these deaths if it weren’t for BLM.

    Since conservatives and conservative media generally don’t have a problem with police, the only reason they suddenly “care” about white people killed by police is to attack BLM.

    ReplyDelete
  9. “the world the slaveholders made."

    What a farcical idea. It wasn’t just made by the slaveholders. It was made by the Founding Fathers as well, who cooperated in the continuation of the evil of slavery.

    It was also made by millions of non-slaveholding whites who sided with the former wealthy slaveholders in their post-war violent repression of newly freed slaves and their determined, legalistic suppression of black citizens from enjoying the full rights of citizenship.

    Somerby’s attempts to ascribe the fault to a tiny fraction of society and to relegate it to the distant past are insidious.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let's put the quote in context:

      Somewhat ironically, it echoes part of our nation's brutal history, in which some lives mattered and other lives didn't, based wholly on issues of "race," a conceptual framework which comes to us live and direct from "the world the slaveholders made." (Emphasis mine.)

      I gather that you noticed that TDH put the phrase in question in quotes. This is a reference to the title of Eugene Genovese's 1969 book of the same name. I'll admit up front that I haven't read Genovese's book, only about it, so feel free to correct me if I've got this wrong. Genovese contended that the slave-owning class set the intellectual framework to support slavery by claiming that racial disparity made the paternalism of enslavement both universally necessary and beneficial.

      The beneficiaries of slavery and its aftermath weren't just millions of non-slaveholding whites who sided with slaveholders. It was virtually everybody. (Except the slaves, of course.) But the "fault" here is setting "the conceptual framework" that made race the paramount consideration in society.

      This hardly removes the fault from everybody who bought into that framework, and it certainly doesn't relegate the consequent problems to the distant past.

      Delete
  10. “But no one has heard of Tony Timpa.”

    That’s odd, because the Post and the Times both reported on this story over a year ago when the body cam footage was released.

    Where was Somerby’s blog post about Timpa back then?

    That’s right. There wasn’t one. He only heard about it when it was discussed in The New Republic the other day, which yet again undermines his contention that cases like Timpa’s aren’t discussed by the media.

    And yet, why did he miss the coverage the case got a year ago in the national press? Isn’t this the kind of story he would key in on, given that he focuses on the press coverage of such cases?

    In fact, all of the deaths he mentions have been covered in the Post and the Times. How else does Somerby know about them?

    ReplyDelete
  11. And another key statistic that is left out is that these people were shot and killed by the police. (Many more were presumably shot but not killed.) But what infractions of the law were involved? The police issued a death sentence in each of those cases. If there was an armed robbery involved, that might be justified, but I suspect many of these were lamentably poorly justified. "Killed for Jaywalking" and "Killed for Talking Back" are probably more prominent that they should be.

    I suggest a law that the police, no matter how afraid they are, cannot use lethal force unless the crime involved is a death penalty offence. They are supposed to be bringing them in, not sentencing and executing folks. Amazingly the police in other countries can do this, but American police are incapable of doing so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Calling these cowardly thug cops "brave first responders" isn't helping, either.

      Delete
  12. Leftist idiots want to pay someone 30K a year to stand still while a filthy violent savage attacks them or attempts to flee to menace the community.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, it's only the brain-dead middle-class liberals who parrot this nonsense (and actually, it's more like $80K). They live in safe neighborhoods.

      People living in crime ridden cities are smarter than that.

      Delete
  13. HOW I GOT MY HUSBAND BACK WITH THE HELP OF PRIEST WISDOM CONTACT ON WHATS_APP NUMBER +2348124644470


    This is my testimony about the good work of priest wisdom who help me ... I'm Ann Earnis from north Carolina USA. And am sorry for putting this on net but i will have to, by this world best spell caster that brought back my husband who left me out for past 3 years, i eventually met this man on a blog site posting by one of is client for help, i explained everything to him and he told me about a spell caster that he had heard about and he gave me an email address to write to the spell caster to tell him my problems. In just 1 days, my husband was back to me. I just want to say thank you to this truthful and sincere spell caster, sir all you told me have come to pass and thank you sir. Please I want to tell everyone who is looking for any solution to their problem, I advise you to kindly consult this spell caster, he is real,he is powerful and whatever the spell caster tells is what will happen, because all what the spell caster told me came to pass. You can kindly contact him on: his email address is supernaturalspell1@gmail.com or directly on whats-app +2348124644470  https://supernaturalspell21.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  14. Am Laura Mildred by name, i was diagnosed with Herpes 4 years ago i lived in pain with the knowledge that i wasn't going to ever be well again i contacted so many herbal doctors on this issue and wasted a large sum of money but my condition never got better i was determined to get my life back so one day i saw Mr. Morrison Hansen post on how Dr. Emu saved him from Herpes with herbal medicine i contacted Dr. Emu on his Email: Emutemple@gmail.com we spoke on the issue i told him all that i went through and he told me not to worry that everything will be fine again so he prepared the medicine and send it to me and told me how to use it, after 14 days of usage I went to see the doctor for test,then the result was negative, am the happiest woman on earth now thanks to Dr. Emu God bless you. Email him at: Emutemple@gmail.com Call or Whats-app him: +2347012841542 

    ReplyDelete