TUESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2024
Tapper gets it (remarkably) wrong: In our view, the Fox News Channel is conducting a fraud against the American public. As it does, the big news orgs in Blue America agree to avert their gaze.
We're speaking about a journalistic fraud. Under the American system, it's the kind of fraud which is hard to pursue in court.
In that sense, it's a bit of a metaphorical fraud, but it's an act of fraud nonetheless. In the face of this behavior, big news orgs like the New York Times have agreed—they will neither report nor discuss what happens on that heavily watched "news channel."
That said, our stars over here in Blue America are also inclined to commit the (journalistic) sins that flesh is heir to. That's especially true at fraught times such as these—but we were stunned by the magnitude of Jake Tapper's errors on Sunday's State of the Union.
At issue is an extremely basic question: What did Candidate Trump actually say? On the occasion in question, he'd been asked a fairly simple question. Once again, here's what that question was:
BARTIROMO (10/13/24): One of the elements at the border has brought in Tren de Aragua, this Venezuelan gang—quite dangerous. You told us about this...
It was an Afghan refugee [who was] charged with plotting an Election Day massacre.
TRUMP: Nothing surprises me.
BARTIROMO: What about that, though? Are you expecting chaos on Election Day?
TRUMP: No. Not from the side which votes for Trump.
BARTIROMO: But I'm just wondering if these outside agitators will start up on Election Day. Let's say you win. Let's remember, you've got 50,000 Chinese nationals in this country in the last couple of years. There are people on the terrorist watch list—350 in the last couple of years. Like you said—13,000 murderers and 15,000 rapists.
What are you expecting? Joe Biden said he doesn’t think it’s going to be a peaceful Election Day.
Once again, that's the date-specific question Trump was asked. The question came from Maria Bartiromo on her Fox News program, Sunday Morning Futures.
As you can see, Bartiromo was asking a very specific question. She was asking if the candidate thought that a certain unspecified type of of "chaos" might occur on Election Day.
At four separate points, Bartiromo specified that she was asking about the possibility of "chaos"—apparently, about the possibility of disruption or violence—on Election Day.
She was asking about Election Day! Here's what Trump said in reply:
TRUMP (continuing directly): Well, he doesn’t have any idea what’s happening, in all fairness. He spends most of his day sleeping.
I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within, not even the people that have come in and destroying our country—by the way, totally destroying our country. The towns and villages, they’re being inundated.
But I don’t think they're the problem in terms of Election Day. I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad people. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics. And I think they're—and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard or if really necessary by the military, because they can’t let that happen.
Quite typically, he began with an insult aimed at President Biden, then continued from there. That said:
Like Bartiromo, he spoke about what he thought could possibly happen on Election Day.
He seemed to say that we have "some very bad people"—"some sick people, radical left lunatics"—who could conceivably create a problem, presumably of the type Bartiromo had mentioned, "in terms of Election Day."
He called them "the enemy from within," "the people from within." He didn't say who he had in mind, and Bartiromo didn't ask. He said he wasn't worried about Tren de Aragua. He said these sick people, these radical left lunatics, might produce some sort of chaos on that particular day.
"If necessary," he said these unspecified people could be "handled by the National Guard." (For the record, that's what eventually happened with respect to the people who stormed the Capitol on January 6.)
"If really necessary," these people could even be handled by the military, he said. Please note:
This whole exchange, beginning to end, concerned some unspecified type of "chaos" which might occur on Election Day. Bartiromo mentioned "Election Day" four separate times—and then, Trump followed suit.
Unless you were watching CNN's State of the Union! On that program, Tapper's producers had now "edited" this exchange down so far that this was all viewers were shown as he spoke with Speaker Mike Johnson:
TAPPER (10/20/24): In multiple interviews this week, Donald Trump repeatedly referred to prominent Democrats and others on the left in the United States, American citizens, as, quote, "the enemy from within," unquote.
And he suggested as president he would want to use the National Guard or military against them. Let me play some of that for our viewers:
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
TRUMP: The bigger problem are the people from within. We have some very bad people. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics. And I think they're—and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, by National Guard or if really necessary by the military, because they can’t let that happen.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
TAPPER: One of the first things you did when you joined Congress was to create the Honor and Civility Caucus. Does wanting to use the military against political opponents, would that pass muster with the Civility Caucus?
Sad! Across the lone and level sands, that was all that remained!
Viewers weren't shown any part of the question Trump had been asked. In this newer, deeper "edit," viewers weren't even shown the part of Trump's answer where he himself said that he was talking about things which could possibly happen on Election Day. That specific reference was also wiped away!
That was a terrible edit. Making matters that much worse, Tapper led with a simple assertion:
According to Tapper, Trump had been referring to "prominent Democrats" when he "suggested" that he might "use the National Guard or military against them."
We're sorry, but there is no such obvious "suggestion" in what the candidate said. Of course, much of that was wiped away when Tapper's producers edited out a basic fact—this whole exchange concerned the possibility of a type of "chaos" on Election Day, full stop.
In his initial response, Johnson seemed to be substantially clearer than Tapper was about what had actually been said. As you can see from the CNN transcript, he was met with stone-cold tribal certainty from Tapper—with stone-cold True Belief.
Much later in the interview with Bartiromo, Trump had also referred to several prominent Democrats as "the enemy from within." In our view, that's a disordered thing to do, but at that time, he said nothing—zero; nada; the null set; zilch—about using the National Guard or the military against them.
That reference came much later in the session with Bartiromo. The possible use of force wasn't mentioned at that time.
Question! Does Tapper think that Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff are likely to produce the kind of "chaos" on Election Day that this earlier exchange explicitly concerned?
In his usual unkempt way, the candidate said that "some sick people, radical left lunatics" might generate that kind of chaos on that specific occasion. But the viewer's ability to evaluate what Tapper was saying was stolen away by that astonishing edit—an edit which wiped away all knowledge of what the Q-and-A was explicitly about.
As we noted last week, The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is played out every day and every night on the Fox News Channel.
Routinely, viewers are kept from hearing the statements which have Trump's critics deeply concerned. Similarly, viewers aren't shown the videotape of the violence which occurred on January 6. They're allowed to live in their own spotless realm, free from any complications which might darken their view of the world.
That's basically what Tapper's producers did with that very deep "edit." Meanwhile, please understand this:
All across Blue America's world, tribal minds will now insist that what Tapper said was perfectly right. Indeed, Colby Hall has explicitly done that over at Mediaite!
That's why we must learn to live alone.
Somerby says he thinks this kind of editing perpetuates tribal warfare and is a fraud against the public.
ReplyDeleteBut why should we believe him?
What’s that smell? Oh, a dead horse.
ReplyDeleteThis wasn't worth talking about in the first place, much less again today. I get it that Somerby has health issues but would it be that hard for him to talk about something useful, such as why he himself is voting for Harris?
ReplyDeleteSomerby sane washing Trump by repeatedly limiting the quote to one interview a week ago, when in reality Trump has repeated the enemy within/national guard/military on our civilians rhetoric ad nauseam and for a long time.
ReplyDeleteSomerby has just given up; he’s a defeated and bitterly angry person. Sad to see his downfall.
Agreed. Bob is off the mark here.
DeleteOnce a rambler like Trump begins a sentence with, "The bigger problem is...." it simply can't be assumed he's confining himself to whatever scenario was being sketched out by his interlocutor.
Yes. The context doesn’t change the meaning of Trump’s remark.
DeleteHey Bob, please see a professional about your memory. This event was not speculative:
Deletehttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/02/us/politics/military-national-guard-trump-protests.html
"He seemed to say ...."
DeleteNo. He actually said it. It's all over Twitter (X) and YouTube.
Both sides encourage ignorance by omitting or downplaying information that makes their side look bad. The problem is greater for liberals, because we live in world in which liberal bias dominates. Conservatives can't away from it. OTOH liberals can just stay away from FoxNews, some conservative newspapers, radio stations and blogs to remain happily ignorant.
ReplyDeleteProof of ignorance is the popular belief that far right causes more violence and death than the far left. The reality is then other way, and by a huge margin.
Trump spent about 10 minutes at an event today trying to decide who was more radical, Bernie or Pocahontas (who he never identified as Warren). But David thinks lack of context is making Trump look bad.
DeleteMeanwhile, David is lying about politically motivated violence:
"In fact, the number of far-right attacks continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism. Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives. In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives."
https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/what-nij-research-tells-us-about-domestic-terrorism
"Both sides encourage ignorance by omitting or downplaying information that makes their side look bad."
DeleteI must have missed the $750 million payout CNN had to make because it lied about the election. Can anybody provide a link?
It will probably be difficult for you to deal with Harris's forthcoming defeat.
DeleteDid you forget the link?
Delete@6:10 forgot /s
DeleteLiberal bias includes a belief in global warming, that vaccines are beneficial, that tax cuts for the rich add to the deficit, and a variety of scientific and empirically tested facts. If the majority of media outlets push the idea that that hydroxychloroquine is ineffective against Covid and Fox purports it to be a useful treatment, that does not make them biased. Equal time given to crackpot ideas is dangerous and in fact contributed to many unnecessary deaths during the pandemic.
DeleteDIC can produce data from law enforcement agencies to defend himself against those of us who call him out as an ignorant or deluded bullshit artist in making his claim against liberals. The FBI identifies the threat posed by right wing extremists that is based in factual historic data.
DeleteDavid must've had a bowl of sh*t for breakfast this morning.
Delete@6:53 - must have magical powers. Must be correct. We might as well pass on voting for the Vice-President and Tim Walz. Face the inevitable.
DeleteFeel better, dork?
Jared is just Ken. So is Vance. Someone needs to help them find a sense of purpose before they tear up everything.
ReplyDeleteVance's youthful patina hides a more batsh*t worldview than Trump while Kushner and his wife are little more than Park Avenue grifters always on the make.
DeleteLike Trump.
Agreed.
DeleteAnonymouse 10:53pm, Wow. I would have guessed you’d be saying this several days before the election, you’ will certainly be saying it if Vance ever runs for prez, but Vance is alreadyworse than Trump? Fast work.
DeleteImagine the response coming from Republicans if VP Harris were to engage in a public commentary about Serena Williams's vagina. The mental deterioration of Trump over the last 4 years has been on display on a nearly daily basis during this run up to the election. The normalization of this behavior by card carrying Trump supporters is the main reason liberals and a subset of conservatives look upon the Trump cult perjoratively. They deserve to be disrespected.
ReplyDeleteLet me fix this for you.
DeleteYou want the mental deterioration of Trump over the last 4 years to have been on display on a nearly daily basis during this run up to the election.
You would like it if it was an issue of normalizing a type of behavior so you could justify looking upon card carrying Trump supporters as a Trump cult.
Liberals and a subset of conservatives are attempting to use faux-outrage over non-issues like this to project disrespect on Trump voters and Trump because they can't beat him politically.
People talk about cock size. Presidential candidates used to never talk about cock size. But we're reached a point in history when one Presidential candidate has realized by talking about cock size 1. he will seem more real to his supporters, because all people talk about cock size and 2. He know his opposition will react to his talk about cock size with faux outrage because they can't beat him politically which will make them seem a.prude b. outdated c. desperate.
So pretending to be upset about Trump talking about cock size helps him. It plays into his hands, It's a trick he has played on you that you have fallen for.
We Dems are really behind the times as far as campaigns and media goes. Maybe we should stop listening to aging white bloggers and political consultants so much.
6:02,
DeleteIt's impossible for the Right to believe the Left is really upset about Trump being a serial rapist, because Republican voters only rally care about two things, bigotry and white supremacy.
Try to never forget that, and you'll always know something valuable about the way Republican voters truly think.
Opening our borders to "own the Right", will never not be funny.
DeleteDemocrats nominating a woman of color, is driving the Right insane. It's a great way to needle Republican voters, who inly really care about bigotry and white supremacy. It even has Trump babbling about dead golfers penis sizes.
DeleteThe Dems need to keep torturing the Right this way. It's hilarious.
It turns out, Republican voters really only care about bigotry and white supremacy. Who knew?
Delete(Narrator: Everyone has known this since the Reagan Presidency).
They should also be viewed as dangerous.
ReplyDeleteFour words: Liz Cheney, military tribunal.
ReplyDeletePerhaps we could ask Trump's former chief of staff about Trump's thoughts on use of the military:
ReplyDeletePeter Baker and Susan Glasser's book, The Divider: Trump in the White House, has already detailed that Trump asked Kelly, “Why can’t you be like the German generals?” at a moment when he was frustrated over his lack of full compliance from the military on every scheme he wanted to do.
I said, ‘Do you mean the kaiser’s generals? Surely you can’t mean Hitler’s generals? And he said, ‘Yeah, yeah, Hitler’s generals.’
Scary!! But you do know these frightening types of October surprises don't work anymore, don't you? They actually work against Democrats now. At one point we could use something like this to sink a candidacy but when voters see something like this now, they know it is the work of a desperate oppositional party.
DeleteIt's so interesting how behind the times the thought leaders of the Democratic Party are. Running campaigns like it's the 90's or 2000's. Thinking dropping a story like this is going to help us! Sorry. It hurts us.
Are all the idiotic blogs that you waste your time on passing this around like it's significant? Are they full of faux outrage over this scary, scary controversy? Too bad because bullshit like this is a gift to Trump
October surprises are a thing of the past, when there was such a thing as a Republican voter who cared about something other than bigotry and white supremacy. That ended with the Ronald Reagan.
DeleteThe Left is desperate to return to the days (almost 50 years ago), when there was a couple of Republican voters, who cared about something other than bigotry and white supremacy.
DeleteMay as well be desperate for a return of the horse and buggy as a mode of transportation.
Anyone who isn't a bigot, or isn't perfectly fine with bigotry, left the Republican Party over two dozen years ago.
DeleteI, for one, appreciate the Republican Party dropping the mask, and admitting fascism is the only thing that turns their voters on.
DeleteSay what you want about the Republican Party embracing the tenets of National Socialism, dude, but at least they are being honest, for a change.
Delete5:47,
DeleteThis is what they get for believing the mainstream media's lies, that Republican voters are "economically anxious", and not just the shit pile of bigots we have always known they are.
Frankly, the Dems deserve to lose for being that gullible.
Yes, that's right. Quoting Trump's former chief of staff shows just how desperate Dems are.
Delete