SUNDAY: Narrative genius improves on the truth!

SUNDAY, JANUARY 26, 2025

A drunken blues man, plus Becka: Based upon his own implied account, James Mangold is a narrative genius.

As we noted yesterday, he isn't constructing Wikipedia entries. He isn't one of those Disney Hall of the Presidents types.

He knows how to take a real-life story and make it many times better. This also happens to be one of the three thousand ways we Blues let the other guy win.

With that, we return to A Complete Unknown, the name of the new Mangold "fiction." (We're quoting the New York Times review when we use that puzzling term.)

Mangold is a highly skilled, very high-ranking, big-time Tinseltown figure. He knows how to make major movies. (For the record, he may also be the nicest guy in the world.)

As noted, the title is A Complete Unknown. Presumably, that refers to what his film's leading figure remains by the end of the Oscar-nominated film in question. 

What was the narrative arc of this film? What is supposed to have happened by the time it ends?

We saw the film on Thursday, and we have no real idea. On the other hand, we can tell you this:

Midway through A Complete Unknown, a somewhat funny thing happens. A character appears, then disappears. The character's name is "Becka."

That said, who the Son House is Becka supposed to be? Accurately or otherwise, here's what Vanity Fair and at least two other sources have said—and we've seen no one say different:

A Complete Unknown: What’s Fact and What’s Fiction in the Bob Dylan Biopic

[...]

A Complete Unknown also shows Dylan on the arm of a British woman named Becka, played by Laura Kariuki. She seems to be a complete fabrication. Someone who isn’t in the film, however, is Carolyn Hester, a significant figure in the folk revivalism scene who had Dylan sit in and blow harmonica on a version of “I’ll Fly Away” that became one of his first professional recording gigs. Hester was briefly married to Richard FariƱa, the singer and author who later married and recorded with Joan Baez’s sister Mimi—just to show you how circular this whole scene was.

Hester doesn't appear in the film. Neither does Mike Seeger. (In his own memoir of the era, Dylan says, at some length, that he decided he'd have to start writing his own songs when he realized he could never perform traditional material anywhere as well as Mike Seeger could. We're speaking here about Mike Seeger, not about his older half-brother Pete.)

Hester is OUT, and so is Seeger. On the other hand, some person named Becka is IN. According to Vanity Fair, Becka is "a British woman" who also happens to be "a complete fabrication."

Becka appears in one fairly substantial scene. In that scene, she gobbles up a brace of concerns which, in the actual story of the actual lives, seem to have been borrowed from Suze Rotolo, Dylan's first (highly influential) New York City girl friend.

In one of the most grisly manifestations of Mangold's narrative genius, he dumbs the Rotolo character way, way down, turning here into a weepy girl friend who won't go away—a weepy girl friend who, judged upon her physical presentation, seems to have been picked up at a mixer at Miss Porter's. (More on that below.)

We'd call that portrait disrespectful and a disgrace. We'd say it reflects a grisly, highly familiar form of Tinseltown gender politics.

Luckily, Mangold is a narrative genius, so he decided to sub Becka in. Vanity Fair omits one somewhat surprising fact:

In the film, Becka isn't just British (and model-ready). Becka is also black!

Just like that, the young Dylan has a British-accented, model-ready black girl friend! At any rate, Becka comes and goes in that one fairly substantial scene. The Rotolo character is still crying over Dylan in at the 1965 Newport Folk Festival, which in real life she didn't attend.

In the film, she's till crying at Newport long after the actual Rotolo and the actual Dylan ceased to be a couple. Also, it was just a few months before Dylan married Sara Lownds (in November of that year).

As of Newport, Lownds was already pregnant with the first of the four children of their eight-year marriage. She goes completely unmentioned in this improved-upon-reality film.

Lownds remains completely unknown. Rotolo is still weeping, and she still looks like a refugee from Miss Porter's

For ourselves, we still hadn't quit on this childish film when the Becka character appeared. That said, we found her presence surprising.

We did find her presence surprising. Then, the loudmouth, drunk black Mississippi bluesman named Jesse Moffette appears.

Moffette's a fabrication too—a gift to us from a certain Hollywood genius. In the film, he's shown appearing on Rainbow Quest, a little-known TV show hosted (for only one season) by Pete Seeger—a show which didn't yet exist at the time the fabricated black bluesman appears.

Here's the problem:

Moffette isn't just a fabricated person. And it isn't just the fact that no one had ever appeared on Seeger's show at this point of time.

Also, it isn't the fact that Bob Dylan never showed up on the set of Rainbow Quest to interrupt the proceedings and to sit in with a Mississippi bluesman, as he does in the Hollywood film. 

In fact, Dylan never appeared on Rainbow Quest at all! The whole dumb scene is made up.

Here's the uglier problem:

It isn't just that "Jesse Moffette" is a fabricated black bluesman. Tinseltown's narrative genius also decided, for whatever reason, that "Moffette" should be presented a stereotypical black loudmouth and drunk.

According to the screenplay published by Deadline, this is the way the scene starts. This is basically the way the scene actually plays out in the film:

PETE (CONT’D) A friend from the deep Delta, Jesse Moffette, is in town this week headlining at Folk City, and he jumped a cab to join us live here at NJU. Jesse, good to see ya.

Pete sits down next to A TOWERING BLUESMAN in tie and jacket, holding a guitar. There’s a harmonica rack around his neck. High conk and wraparound shades. Jesse pulls out a bottle of peppermint schnapps, and interrupts [sic] a healthy swig.

JESSE MOFFETTE Not headlining. I open, then this white boy with a sketchy beard comes on after me and it’s like he’s reading the paper. He just sings the damned headlines.

Jesse holds the bottle out to Pete.

PETE Not while I’m working, thanks.

Sad.

Moffette's Fetchit-adjacent behavior continues along from there. Before too long, Dylan himself shows up and sits in with the fictional bluesman—with the fictional drunken black bluesman who didn't exist in real life.

Might we offer these thoughts?

As you can see by clicking this link, there were 39 episodes of Rainbow Quest in its one little-noticed season. Several "black bluesmen" did in fact appear.

You can see Sonny Terry and Brownie McGhee's appearance by clicking this. Sonny and Brownie were dignified men. They weren't stereotypical drunks.

Neither was the gentle, soft-spoken Mississippi John Hurt. You can see him here.

How about the Reverend Gary Davis? If you want to see a stunningly beautiful performance of one form of American music, we'll advise you to just click this.

(Yes, that's Donovan on the same show, 19 or 20 years old at the time. As for Rev. Davis, his performance just grows and grows. He was a remarkably handsome man who performed with remarkable conviction.)

None of these people showed up drunk or drinking. None of them showed up complaining about white boys on some bill. 

That came from the puzzling mind of a Tinseltown narrative genius. Then came the work song gang.

By now, we've reached this movie's clown-car car-wreck final scenes, at Newport 1965. 

Johnny Cash wasn't at Newport that year. But he shows up there in the film, enjoyably wrecking several cars as he tries to drive away. 

Joan Baez wasn't there on the night in question, but she gets shoehorned in too. It makes the reality better!

The actual person named Suze Rotolo wasn't present at Newport either. In the creatively brilliant film, the Rotolo character gets shoehorned into these closing scenes, still weeping and crying over the boyfriend she has lost to Joan, still looking like an escapee from Miss Porter's.

(The actual Rotolo was the Gotham-born daughter of Italian immigrant Communist parents. A narrative genius seemed to know that her physical affect—so memorable and so beloved from the iconic Freewheelin' album cover—would have had to be cleaned up.)

Cash and Rotolo and Baez weren't there. Famously, Dylan was. In the "fictional" film, just before he takes to the stage, this incongruous scene occurs:

PETE (O.S.) Let’s welcome the Texas Prison Worksong Group! 

CUT TO:

EXT. NEWPORT FOLK FESTIVAL — STAGE — NIGHT

Pete Seeger, center stage... Behind him, SIX MEN IN PRISON GARB carrying axes, under the watch of AN ARMED GUARD.

PETE Six men serving life and the guard is not a prop! Neither’s the tree trunk!

THE MEN circle the tree, axes in hand, and start their singing and chopping. 

Offstage: Alan Lomax approaches Pete.

ALAN LOMAX We saw Bob. Came away with a handful of air. It’s gotta be you, Pete

(“Hammer Ring” performed by Texas Prison Worksong Group featuring Oren Waters)

Say what? At the closing concert of the festival, Dylan is about to go on stage. 

His opening act seems to be the Texas Prison Worksong Group—six men in prison garb, carrying axes, under the watch of an armed guard? With Pete Seeger on the festival stage, saying this?

Six men serving life and the guard is not a prop! Neither’s the tree trunk!

Is that what happened that fateful night? If not, why in the world did a narrative genius shove it into his film?

Full disclosure! A group called the "Texas Work Song Group" ("prison" unmentioned) did perform at Newport in 1965. Based upon the festival's brochures, they took part in a pair of workshops on Friday afternoon. They then appeared in the lengthy concert on Friday night, where they were one of fourteen different acts.

Based upon the official brochures, they took part in no events after that—not on Saturday, not on Sunday. Based upon the official brochures, they did not appear in the closing concert on that fateful Sunday night.

The appearance of this group in this festival was part of the slightly eccentric "folk music" culture of that particular time—a culture which might seem somewhat quirky today. 

Newport featured some very famous performers. It also featured various people no one had ever heard of. For example:

In that Friday night concert, the Texas Work Song Group shared the bill with Peter, Paul and Mary and also with Pete Seeger. They also shared the bill with an act called "New York Street Games." For better or for worse, the world of Newport was like that.

(Here's Pete Seeger at Newport, playing for the Blue Ridge Mountain Dancers. They weren't a famous group.)

There actually was a "Texas Work Song Group" at Newport in 1965. Did they perform in the manner shown in the film? Did Seeger ever say the things he's shown saying in that screenplay?

We have no idea.

That said, why did the narrative giant decide to insert a gang of black convicts into the stew, following on his drunken Mississippi bluesman and the irascible, obnoxious black attendant who suddenly and strangely appears on the screen during one of Dylan's visits to see Woody Guthrie—during one of the visits which didn't actually occur?

Why were these black characters inserted into the film? More appallingly, why were these black character, British-accented Becka excepted, portrayed in the amazingly familiar old ways Mangold weirdly chose?

Regarding the stereotyping of the loudmouths, drunks and convicts, we have no idea. As to why these people are in this film at all, we do have a small idea.

James Mangold is a narrative genius. He may also be a seeker of prizes and of cash.

By clicking here, you can possibly start to see why these black characters were shoehorned in. It's part of the low-IQ rush toward "DEI" which followed the lonesome murder of George Floyd in late May 2020.

Those of us in Blue America often rushed to display our good faith in the wake of that highly visible killing. In a million different ways, we proved an unmistakable fact:

There's no such thing as a good intention which can't be unwisely pursued.

In our race toward "DEI" and "Woke," we gave the gang on the Fox News Channel a hundred and one easy ways to say how phony and dumb we are. We're still out there, this very day, continuing to hand them these gifts. 

Why was the invented bluesman portrayed as a loudmouth and as a drunk?  You'll have to ask Mangold himself—and no one ever will.

Why were the black performers inserted into the closing Sunday night concert a bunch of convicts from Texas? You'll have to ask him that too.

What was the point of that sudden intrusion by that loudmouth black attendant? Why was the invented "Becka" shoved into this film at all?

You'll have to ask Mangold those questions.  As hosts on Fox News keep mocking our dumbness, none of us Blues ever will.

Our view?

The refashioning of the Rotolo character struck us as a pathetic example of throwback gender politics. The insertion of those invented black characters struck us as one of the strangest and most appalling things we've seen in recent years.

All along the watchtower, Blue America's elites have failed to question—even to notice—these puzzling choices by Mangold. So it has gone, for decades now, as we Blues pretend to be the kinds of people we pretty much aren't, but also as we name-call everyone else.

In making a "fiction" film of this kind, the money comes from using real names. The "fiction" comes when a self-admitted narrative genius starts changing real facts all around.

The wife is gone, the girl friend stays! Needless to say, she's a weeper.

The real Bob Dylan once recorded the words shown below. These words appear on the Freewheelin' album—the early album which featured an actual engaging young woman right there on its still-famous cover.

The young man's words were full of whimsy. This is what a very young man whimsically said:

Unlike most of the songs nowadays that are being written uptown in Tin Pan Alley—that's where most of the folk songs come from nowadays. This, this is a song, this wasn't written up there. 

This was written somewhere down in the United States!

In our view, Mangold's remarkably empty film comes from Tin Pan Alley. To our eye and ear, it seems to contain some amazingly strange and weirdly familiar old hooks, and we Blues have been eating it up! 

No one has questioned, or even mentioned, the puzzling hooks we've cited. Despite the claims we like to make, we Blues just aren't super sharp.

On the brighter side, Mangold managed to check the boxes which let him pursue a very big prize. This is one the three million ways that fellow got back to the White House.

Final suggestion: Don't fail to watch the Rev. Davis. That is an amazing performance—a piece of Americana. 

71 comments:

  1. So what you're saying is James Mangold's Dylan bio-pic helped get Trump elected.

    Right. Got it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A right wing vanity blog whining about DEI and wokeism, who knew?

      Delete
    2. Exhibit 1 of lack of self-awareness:

      "He knows how to take a real-life story and make it many times better. This also happens to be one of the three thousand ways we Blues let the other guy win."

      Delete
    3. The inclusion of invented black characters may be an attempt to appeal to performative diversity and inclusion rules at the expense of the truth which relates to the same kind of lack of critical thinking that lost Democrats votes.

      Delete
  2. It isn't that Rotolo won't go away, it is that Dylan himself keeps returning to her, even barging in on her with another man in her apt. She is then angry, not weepy. But Somerby has stereotyped her as weepy and clingy when, after breaking up with Dylan, she goes her own way until Dylan brings her back into his orbit.

    Somerby complains that "Becka" is a fabrication when Sylvia (the Rotolo stand-in) is also a fabrication as are almost every other woman in the film except Baez (who is perhaps too famous to gloss). That is Mangold's conceit for the film. It disguises the callowness of Dylan's treatment of women by combining them into nameless faceless composites as he meets them and dumps them and reuses them during the course of that short period in his life. Dylan didn't treat women well, but it is questionable whether he treated anyone well. That is what Somerby misses. Look how Dylan mistreats Pete Seeger, who IS in the film.

    Somerby calls this throwback gender politics, but that isn't the way men in general were expected to relate to women. Men in those throwback times did not hit their wives in the jaw, did not rape teenagers, and did not bring their girlfriends to breakfast with their wives and children. There was never a time when that behavior was OK. The film deals with this misbehavior by not showing it.

    This is why men in particular need to take Women's Studies courses in college. That way they can critique films without embarrassing themselves with their lack of historical knowledge about how women were treated in different time periods. This film depicts a time 5 years before Women's Lib. This wasn't the 50s and these are not Stepford Wives. The women Dylan encountered in NYC were female equivalents to himself, women participating in protests (as Rotolo did), living independently, attaining their own fame as folksingers and musicians, choosing their own men and sleeping with them without marriage. What throwback sexual politics does Somerby think he is seeing as he excuses Dylan's bad behavior?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sleeping with men without marriage is bad behavior.

      Ask the millions of unwanted children born to single mothers if they wish they'd had a married father and mother in their home who had decided to get married and have children.

      There are millions more slaughtered in the womb. You can't ask them.

      Delete
  3. Odetta was not invented, she was famous, and black. Blues singers were part of the folk scene, as was suport for civil rights. Those black characters were not invented either. And then there was Mavis Staples (of the Staples Singers) who Dylan says he loved and asked to marry him ( while he was touring with Baez). She was not invented. Somerby seems to think that Dylan’s life and the NYC folk scene were white but integration was the point for performers and audience.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dylan got married after the time period and events of this film. Mangold didn’t disappear his wife.

      Delete
    2. Dylan is quoted as saying what a profound influence Odetta had on his career.

      Delete
    3. “ By 1955, Odetta began appearing as a singer and a dramatic actress on film and television, and by 1959, she was a headliner at Carnegie Hall and had toured the world's greatest stages. Bob Dylan, Joan Baez, Janis Joplin have acknowledged Odetta as their first major inspiration and influence.Feb 28, 2018.

      ASCAP Remembering Odetta, The voice of the Civil Rights Movement.

      Delete
  4. The “invention” of black characters ruins the film for Somerby, to the point where he insists they weren’t really there. Even Odetta! This is what racism looks like. This is how the right tries to erase black people from all of American history.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby says Mangold “checks all the boxes” for Oscar nomination, as if including black people (who were there and important to Dylan) were a kind of movie DEI and wokeness, not a depiction of reality but a concoction of commercialism requiring liberal performativity. The film glosses Dylan, if anything, but it has deempasized black influences in Dylan’s life, not invented them. I question Johnny Cash’s role.

      Delete
  5. “ Narrative genius improves on the truth!”

    Aside from the reports that Dylan himself did a script reading and made suggestions prior to the film, and praised Chalemet’s performance, Somerby’s contention that only the (so called) “truth” is valid in an artistic endeavor is odd. I will point out that Shakespeare took quite a few liberties with the truth in his history plays, Richard III, for example, to make an artistic and emotional point, and perhaps to cast history in certain ways relevant to his overall purpose.

    Mangold was not making a documentary, after all.

    And why so many films about Dylan? Didn’t Scorsese do one a while back? Why no films about Odetta?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shakespeare was a propagandist for the Tudors.

      Delete
    2. And he was a great writer and had great insight into human nature. Every artist has a point of view. That’s unavoidable.

      Delete
    3. Good point of view.

      Delete
    4. Science has revealed his insights to be lacking.

      Delete
  6. The Summer of Love was 1967 but this film is about the early 60s, when high schools still had dress codes forbidding girls to wear jeans/pants. I think the clothing of Rotolo was accurate for the civil rights and folk scene. Hippie garb with peasant skirts came later. Somerby should look at what the performers were wearing. Shirts & sweaters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby seems to think they didn’t research what women were wearing in the folk scene in NYC.

      Delete
  7. Dylan is unworthy of Bob’s attention, or yours, or mine.

    ReplyDelete
  8. How many movies have depicted Native Americans as mindless savages, or rural life as idyllic, or fascist cops or murderous vigilantes cast as heroes? These are a kind of “right wing” intrusion on the truth, but no complaints, apparently. Somerby was upset when people (“liberals” one assumes?) tried to correct some of the myths surrounding the colonists and the native Americans at Plymouth, preferring what would seem to be the conservative narrative. It isn’t clear Somerby cares primarily about “truth”.

    ReplyDelete
  9. WHAT THE BOB DYLAN BIOPIC ‘A COMPLETE UNKNOWN’ GETS WRONG

    https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/bob-dylan-movie-a-complete-unknown-fact-check-1235194229/

    In the article, it stated this:

    “Bob Dylan insisted that James Mangold include a wildly inaccurate scene in A Complete Unknown”

    Perhaps Dylan had more influence over the film than we are aware. He famously liked to invent himself and not stick to the “truth.” Maybe the vision is more Dylan’s than Mangold’s.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes, the inclusion of fictional Black characters and (possibly) fictitious events involving blacks and others was solely meant to gain cred with the academy (and liberal audiences), because we can read Mangold’s and Dylan’s minds, and this variance from the truth in this supposed biopic clearly upsets some voters, who therefore voted for Trump.

    And all liberals are really to blame for this, including, one supposes, Democrats, some of whom are centrists and really have no opinion about Mangold’s movie.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How the heck have you crossed your brains wires so hard. Pure jibberish.

      Delete
    2. I’m just trying to understand Somerby’s point, which seems to be that the Dylan movie lost Democrats votes. So, if it’s gibberish, it’s Somerby’s gibberish.

      Delete
    3. It’s film salad.

      Delete
    4. The inclusion of invented black characters may be an attempt to appeal to performative diversity and inclusion rules at the expense of the truth which relates to the same kind of lack of critical thinking that lost Democrats votes.

      Delete
  11. The mental decline of Bob mirrors his right wing shift.

    ReplyDelete
  12. David and Cecelia voted for this:

    https://jabberwocking.com/trump-starts-fight-with-colombia-over-nothing/

    ReplyDelete
  13. I sure do support this. First of all, saying "Trump starts..." is untrue. It was started by Columbia by refusing to let an American plane land. Second, the United States rapidly prevailed in this brouhaha. Columbia quickly folded faced with the threat of massive tariffs.

    @4:57, can you explain why you disapprove of Trump's action?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Colombians didn’t want a US military plane. They were willing to accept a civilian plane. There was no need to intimidate them. Drum explained it at the link.

      Delete
    2. Here’s more from Kevin:

      https://jabberwocking.com/colombia-tells-trump-to-fuck-off/

      Trump needlessly turns friends into enemies.

      Delete
    3. Colombia has not folded.

      Delete
    4. @6:03 Your friends don't prevent your planes from landing.

      @5:58 You (and I assume Kevin) talk as if it's normal to refuse entry to a US military plane full of Colombians. AFAIK it's not normal. I sort of agree with Kevin that this was a fight over nothing, but why did Colombia start such a fight? What would it gain Colombia to prohibit this flight?

      Delete
    5. If we can decide who enters our country, the Colombians can decide what planes enter their country.

      Friends do not send military planes into other countries against those countries’ will.

      Delete
    6. The entire world is rapidly turning away from the USA's unstable leadership. To DiC that is winning. What a foolish person.

      Delete
    7. Hitler has never had so much support! šŸ§

      Delete
    8. Can anyone even TRY to imagine Joe Biden having his kind of energy and character? šŸ‘€šŸ˜‚šŸ¤·šŸ¼‍♀️

      Delete
    9. 8:27: “This kind?” Meaning the energy of a demented sociopath and the character of a guttersnipe? No, we can’t.

      Delete
    10. Ah Yes..it is wonderful to live in “Hitlers America” as a “Nazi supporter” myself šŸ¤·šŸ½‍♂️šŸ˜‚

      Delete
    11. You must be very happy, 8:49.

      Delete
    12. "AFAIK it's not normal."

      I think we have enough experience with the reliability of "as far as DiC knows." You don't know whether its normal or not, do you?

      Delete
    13. "Columbia quickly folded faced with the threat of massive tariffs."

      No. Where did you get this idea?

      Delete
    14. Did you bother reading what Colombia’s president, Gustavo Petro said DIC? He did not say the felon could not return Columbians, he said we need to figure out a dignified system for returning Columbians. Don't be a pendejada David.

      Delete
    15. šŸšØThe White House says "Colombia has agreed to all of President Trump’s terms including the unrestricted acceptance of all illegal aliens from Columbia returned from the United States... deported back to their country." Arty Humiliated yet again!

      Delete
    16. Trump backed down: he’s not insisting on a military plane.

      Delete
    17. Summary: Trump picked a fight with a smaller, weaker adversary, made big threats, ran away from the fight, and claimed victory.

      He's the opposite of TR.

      Delete
    18. You can put away your hysteria Columbia already caved. So Trump saved us thousands of dollars because they are sending their own planes to pick up their criminals. Trump 1 hysterical Dems 0 šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ‘€šŸ¤·‍♂️šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø

      Delete
  14. A Trumpist degenerate begs him not to deport the migrants who support her:

    https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/01/24/congress/immigration-politics-00200600

    ReplyDelete
  15. Today, the American president proposed "cleaning out" Gaza by relocating its entire population to other countries. What he proposes is sometimes called "forced relocation" or "ethnic cleansing" and it's a violation of international law. Only the most radical right-wing Israeli officials have dared to publicly suggest anything close to this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trump IS the President of Peace…this and the incoming sit-down between him and Putin - likely ending that war too- proves it! šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡øšŸ«”

      Promises made = Promises Kept šŸ’Æ

      Delete
    2. Your little emojis really make your comment so much more convincing, 10:25. Or were you being sarcastic? That would totally be funny.

      Delete
    3. Quaker: “Your guy over promises and under delivers!”

      *gives 2 off the cuff examples of the opposite being true*

      “..durp tOuCh gRaSs! el Oh El” šŸ¤·šŸ½‍♂️šŸ˜‚šŸ˜­šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø

      Delete
    4. I hope they find cure for your TDS šŸ™šŸ½❤️

      Delete
    5. Quaker - no suggestion for Gaza makes sense. The Palestinians in Gaza are committed to wiping out Israel. They're willing to die to eliminate the Jews there. They train their children in the same passionate hatred. So, how can there be a lasting peace?

      Trump's thinking looks preposterous, for the reasons you give, Quaker. Yet, if there ever is a solution, I think it must come from thinking outside the box. Trump's thinking outside the box was key in achieving the Abraham accords. Everyone "knew" that no deal between Israel and its neighbors was possible until the Palestinian problem was solved. Trump's team didn't "know" this. So, they achieved a peace agreement without the Palestinian situation being settled.

      If the Israel/Gaza situation is ever solved, it will require coming up with a solution that's currently considered unthinkable IMO.

      Delete
    6. @10:25 Something you imagine is going to happen is not evidence or proof of anything

      Delete
    7. Here’s a solution outside the box: the entire Jewish population of Israel emigrates to the USA.

      Delete
    8. That's advice you should remember, David. I'll do you the favor of remembering it for you.

      Delete
    9. And in your reckoning, there's no such thing as a civilian in Gaza? Not from the tiniest baby to the most frail old woman, they're all combatants?

      Either that or you're fine with violations of international law.

      Choose.

      Delete
    10. @Anon 11:01
      At least try to make sense, willya?

      Delete
    11. Quaker — I’m not fine with anything as regards Gaza. All I can foresee is unending wars, probably with more powerful weapons and increasing ferocity.

      Delete
    12. The Abraham accords have been a remarkable success at sustaining peace in the Middle East.

      Delete
    13. Biden commits genocide
      Liberals: "Israel has a right to kill Palestinians"

      Trump continues the genocide
      Liberals: "Awful, these are real human beings"
      šŸ‘€šŸ’°šŸ˜’šŸ¤·šŸ½‍♂️šŸ˜‚

      Delete
  16. Is the author so out of touch he doesn't know why these fake characters were inserted or real characters were faked?

    Becka the fake black girlfriend with all the positive attributes exists so we the woke can be happy that the famous singer likes a black woman. Also all black women are desirable models.

    Rotolo was played as weepy and clinging so that the white girlfriend could be despised, and deservedly so since she's white and influential.

    The white wife was disappeared because she's the one he chose, and we can't have our hero choosing the white wimmen.

    He would have shoehorned in a gay lover, the love of Dylan's life, but concluded it was a bridge too far since most of the history is known.

    The big black Jesse Moffette and other sundry blacks were inserted as caricatures to give us Superiors the opportunity to approve of them in spite of their drunkenness or what have you, and bask in our Good Person status for bestowing our acceptance upon these black characters. The other, Bad Persons would disapprove of for their drunkenness and other understandable traits of the oppressed. We aren't racists like they are, and the suggestion that the stereotypes presented are negative is deeply racist. We approve of Jesse and his drunkenness because we're Good People.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for paraphrasing Somerby’s original post. It makes no more sense, but thanks anyway.

      Delete
    2. The inclusion of invented black characters may be an attempt to appeal to performative diversity and inclusion rules at the expense of the truth which relates to the same kind of lack of critical thinking that lost Democrats votes.

      Delete
  17. Presidents come and Presidents go.

    Through it all.

    Trump will still be on the throne.

    ReplyDelete