BACKLASH: Hall said he doesn't like Gutfeld's work!

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2025

But he never said why: Who the heck is Colby Hall? We thought you'd never ask!

Hall is the founding editor of Mediaite.com, a news site which records the types of (significant) nonsense the New York Times may choose to disappear. In the past few months, we've read a lot of sensible opinion pieces by Hall right there at Mediaite.

We were less familiar with Hall's work back in July, when he published a profile of the Fox News Channel's Greg Gutfeld and his primetime Gutfeld! show. 

The headline referred to Gutfeld as a "prankster." Hall's profile started like this:

Opinion
Greg Gutfeld’s Disruptive Rise: How a Fox News Prankster Broke Late-Night TV

Stephen Colbert’s Late Show is over, and while the official reason has yet to be confirmed, reports suggest CBS was hemorrhaging money to the tune of $40 million a year. The show reportedly employed more than 220 staffers and cost an eye-popping $100 million annually to produce. Yes, there is the whole corporate fealty to Trump at play, which I went into great detail on Friday, but this blockbuster-movie money for a nightly talk show. In an age of media belt-tightening and digital fragmentation, that model may simply no longer be sustainable.

Which brings us to Greg Gutfeld.

Yes, Gutfeld—the often smirking, occasionally cringeworthy Fox News host who somehow emerged as a legit force in late-night-style comedy. And while I’ve personally called his brand of humor “witless” (and stand by that), it’s impossible to deny: Gutfeld has cracked the code, disrupting a TV genre once defined by Johnny Carson, David Letterman, Jay Leno, and yes, Colbert himself.

Let’s be clear: Gutfeld! airs at 10 p.m. ET, which technically makes it a primetime show. But in tone, structure, and format, it’s a late-night show—monologue, roundtable, recurring gags, rotating co-hosts with semi-celebrity status, and alt-right bona fides, with a wink toward absurdist commentary on the day’s news almost always at the expense of libturds and lamestream media.

[NOTE: As of this morning, the Mediaite site seems to be down. For that reason, we can't provide a link to Hall's essay.]

As the profile started, Hall engaged in a bit of the standard sleight-of-hand according to which the Fox News Channel has branded Gutfeld as "the king of late night" comedy. Because he knew that Gutfeld! actually isn't a late night" show, Hall began by describing the show as "a force in late-night-style comedy" (our emphasis).

Hall then acknowledged the fact that Gutfeld! isn't a "late night" show at all. Even there, an obvious corner was cuthe noted the fact that Gutfeld! airs at 10 p.m., failing to say that it airs at that time only in the Eastern time zone.

(We're assuming he would have known that.)

In fact, the show airs at 9 p.m. in the Central time zone, at 7 p.m. out on the coast. For whatever reason, it's been standard behavior for mainstream journalists to fuzz those facts as profiles of Gutfeld have appeared this year. This misrepresentation helps Fox extend the claim that Gutfeld's viewership numbers have established him as "the king of late night"as the reigning monarch of the late-night comedy wars.

Gutfeld! actually is a heavily watched "cable news" show; it has the third highest viewership in all of cable news. On its face, that's a striking achievementbut the Fox News Channel likes to claim a higher glory, and one mainstream journalist after another has seemed to play along with this channel's vastly misleading claim, to greater or lesser degree.

As he continued, Hall continued to fuzz the claim that Gutfeld! actually is a "late night comedy" show. We would dispute both parts of that description, but here's what Hall's profile says:

(Continuing directly from above)
What sets it apart isn’t just that it’s on Fox News, but that it’s doing all this with a staff reportedly no bigger than maybe twenty people? Gutfeld’s creative team is small, tight, and far from bloated.

That lends something to his show that late-night hasn’t had in a long time: authenticity. You might not like the jokes (I usually don’t), but the DIY spirit is palpable. Gutfeld honed his voice back in the Maxim and Stuff magazine days, where the “laddie” culture prioritized irreverence, irrelevance, and low-fi swagger. He sharpened his satirical chops further hosting Fox’s cult-classic Red Eye, a weird, smart, surreal show that quietly built him a following among insomniac media nerds and libertarian night owls.

The result is a show that, while not for everyone, clearly resonates with a large audience—an audience that often feels condescended to or outright ignored by mainstream comedy. Much of that can be attributed to Fox News’ built-in viewership who, judging by the network's dominant ratings, seem eager to watch every hour of programming on the network 

Suzanne Scott, Fox News CEO, deserves credit for greenlighting the 10 p.m. shift that let Gutfeld own a bold new time slot—a gamble that paid off big. Launching a late-night show on a cable news network was risky, but she recognized the post-pandemic appetite for smart, fun, non-lecturey comedy.

By the end of that passage, Gutfeld! is being described as "a late-night show" all over againbut a second point of curiosity has now appeared:

Hall has started saying that he himself doesn't especially like Gutfeld's humor. ("You might not like the jokes," he says. "I usually don't.")

Hall doesn't care for Gutfeld's comedybut he has twice described Gutfeld's work as "smart!" For reasons we'll discuss as the week proceeds, we're amazed to think that he would have selected that particular term as he describes Gutfeld's work.

We're amazed to think that Hall would describe Gutfeld's work as "smart!" But then, there's also this:

in the course of the profile, Hall says or suggests, again and again, that he himself isn't a fan of Gutfeld's "smart, fun" comedy. Beyond that, he suggests that you, the reader of Mediaite, may not care for this "smart, fun comedy" either. 

Here's how the profile ends:

It’s ironic, maybe even darkly comedic, that Fox News—once seen as antithetical to comedy—now produces the most-watched “late-night” show on cable. While the other networks trim costs or shut down completely, Gutfeld’s frugally produced, stripped-down format thrives. The jokes might be cheap—but so is the overhead.

To be fair, there’s room for everyone. Comedy is subjective. Gutfeld’s not for me, just as Colbert was never going to win over the Hannity crowd. But TV is a business, and in the end, the audience decides. And right now, more viewers are tuning into the scrappy, sarcastic conservative guy—notorious for his ill-advised bit in trying to reclaim “nazi” for conservatives—on Fox with a dozen writers and a former pro wrestler.

Restaurants have menus for a reason. You may not want what Gutfeld’s serving—but a whole lot of people clearly do.

Once again, Hall is fashioning Gutfeld! as "a late-night show," even though he knows that isn't accurate. Having said that, it's true:

A whole lot of people do seem to like Gutfeld's "comedy stylings." But Hall has said, again and again, that he himself isn't one of those peopleand he closes his profile by saying that his readers may not like Gutfeld's "smart, fun" comedy either.

Colby Hall doesn't like Gutfeld's "smart, fun comedy!" Along the way, he has offered hints as to why that might be the case, but he never explicitly unravels this conundrum. Nor does he ever quote the sort of "smart, fun" material a reader might encounter if he or she decides to tune in to this primetime show.

Why doesn't Colby Hall enjoy Greg Gutfeld's "smart, fun" comedy? We can easily guess at the answer to that, but the answer is never spelled out.

In our view, Hall's failure to unpack this riddle raises a set of questions about the prevailing values of our own Blue American world:

In yesterday morning's report, we refreshed you as to the claims made in Backlash, Susan Faludi's 1991 "feminist classic." As almost anyone should be able to see, an obvious type of angry backlash seems to be involved in Greg Gutfeld's "smart, fun" comedyan angry, extremely coarse backlash which has long struck us as the swill which might emerge from an overturned garbage can.

That said, mainstream profiles of the Gutfeld! show have persistently failed to describe the essence of his angry, coarse offerings. Routinely, journalists have refused to quote samples of Gutfeld's comedy stylings, just as Hall has done.

We've seen a lot of good work by Hall. Back in July, we were puzzled by this profile.

Our questions go like this:

Does Blue America have a sexual politics at this point in time? Did we ever have a sexual politics? We'll ponder such questions all week.

Tomorrow: A smart, fun start to the show


59 comments:


  1. "Colby Hall doesn't like Gutfeld's "smart, fun comedy!" Along the way, he has offered hints as to why that might be the case, but he never explicitly unravels this conundrum."

    Colby Hall doesn't like Gutfeld's smart, fun comedy because Gutfeld's smart, fun comedy makes fun of idiot BlueAnons, and Colby Hall is one of them idiot BlueAnons.

    ...and this has been another edition of obvious answers to stupid questions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Reminds me of the time Right-wingers threw a childish temper tantrum at the U.S. Capitol, all because black people's votes were counted in the 2020 Presidential election.

      Delete
    2. It was obvious when Somerby "discovered" Mediaite because all of a sudden there were positive references to it and quotes from Colby Hall. We're traumatized but we aren't stupid, Somerby.

      Delete
    3. We should applaud Somerby consuming something besides Fox 24/7.

      Delete
    4. Turns out Bill Clinton never went to the "island" (unlike Pinker), yet that hasn't stopped Trump from lying about it.

      womp womp

      Delete
    5. I am Corby, not Colby.

      Delete
    6. Pinker is innocent.

      Delete
    7. Pinker's sexism and defense of neoliberalism aside, he is innocent of many crimes, but he did go the island, was "serviced" as a witness testified to under oath, so with respect to Epstein and using Epstein's "services", Pinker is guilty.

      Delete
    8. You lie. Pinker is innocent.

      Delete
    9. No it is true.

      Pinker associated with Epstein, visiting his island, being serviced by one of Epstein's girls, and then offered to help in Epstein's defense when he was on trial for sex trafficking underage girls.

      Pinker is guilty.

      Delete
  2. Influencer Bob Somerby is today touting not just Gutfeld but also Mediaite. Who cares what Colby Hall likes or doesn't like, quotes or doesn't quote. No one in their right mind would watch Gutfeld under any circumstances.

    Somerby promises to talk about Backlash in his headline then pretends that Gutfeld is backlash and not just straight out misogyny. Maybe Epstein's trafficking of girls was just one big backlash too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No one in their right mind reads the Daily Howler.

      Delete
    2. No one in their right mind comments on the Daily Howler.

      Delete
  3. Here is Trump channeling Gutfeld:

    "President Donald Trump lashed out at a reporter Friday after being asked about Jeffrey Epstein, hurling an insult at her and refusing to answer her question about efforts to release files on the disgraced financier.

    “If there’s nothing incriminating in the files, sir, why not?” a Bloomberg reporter could be heard asking Trump aboard Air Force One in a video released by the White House before being cutoff by Trump.

    “Quiet!” Trump snapped back. “Quiet piggy!”

    This is our president. This is the leader who told investigators to back off Andrew Tate on his sex trafficking charges.

    Why is he still in office? Obviously, because men do not care what happens to women. But are there no boundaries to presidential behavior, nothing that would get Trump fired by the American people?

    Why does Somerby waste day after day on Gutfeld when there is bad stuff like this happening every day on the right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tiedrich's take on this incident makes more sense than anything Colby Hall has to say:

      "Bloomberg reporter Jennifer Jacobs: “if there’s nothing incriminating in the Epstein files, sir, why not—?”

      Donny [stabbing his finger right into her face]: “quiet. quiet, piggy.”

      he’s such a ginormous piece of shit, and he’s only getting worse as he decays."

      Somerby, as usual, picks the wrong guy to admire.

      Delete
    2. Who is more of a "piggy" than Trump? The lack of self awareness is wild.

      Delete
    3. Millions of women voted for Trump.

      Delete
    4. Once you become a woman, Trump is no longer a threat to rape you.

      Delete
    5. Most women did not vote for Trump.

      Delete
    6. Most women did not vote for Harris, nor for Clinton.

      Delete
    7. Harris won the women vote by at least 8 points.

      Delete
    8. Did you count those women who didn’t bother to vote at all?

      Delete
  4. Somerby makes a big deal out of Colby Hall not liking Gutfeld's work. I'll bet if Somerby worked really hard, he might find a woman or two who doesn't like Gutfeld's work either. What makes Colby Hall's opinion so important? What makes the reactions of women to Gutfeld (aside from the ones paid to sit and grin on the show) unimportant to Somerby?

    Somerby is the backlash too. That's why he is ignoring the decades of progress made by women after the publication of Faludi's book. He wants us to believe that the women's movement never gained traction, was over back in the 80s, because if we swallow that one then we might also believe that this is all just a witchhunt against Trump and that Epstein was a nobody who did nothing wrong, because women just like to complain about empty nonsense like Gutfeld's ridiculous show.

    I am tired of Somerby and his inability to identify what is real in the world. This is a huge sex scandal involving underage girls (children) who were abused by Epstein and Maxwell who offered them up to old men with money. Trump is involved and so are many other rich men.

    Decent men are choosing to side with women, with the victims, on this one. Somerby is pretending the right's biggest problem is Gutfeld, who is just showing that there is a backlash against women's rights -- duh. Men don't give up their privileges without a fight. But women vote now and they are not choosing Trump or Republican candidates. They are voting their interests, for candidates who support women's rights and women's health issues. That should be big political news but it is invisible to Somerby, who is pretending women care about fat jokes and not abortion rights or equal pay or men doing their fair share of housework and childcare.

    Complaining about Gutfeld's stupid comedy is not a substitute for supporting women, especially when it comes to young girls being abused by wealthy old men.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "He wants us to believe that the women's movement never gained traction, was over back in the 80s, because if we swallow that one then we might also believe that this is all just a witchhunt against Trump and that Epstein was a nobody who did nothing wrong, because women just like to complain about empty nonsense like Gutfeld's ridiculous show."

      Another remarkable insight into the hidden inner workings of Your Gracious Host's brain! How do you do it?

      Also, why?

      Delete
    2. Why Somerby repeats Right-wing grievances on the daily is a mystery for readers like Quaker.

      Delete
    3. Quaker in a BasementNovember 18, 2025 at 3:28 PM

      No mystery! No mystery!

      We're blessed with the assistance of an all-seeing Bob whisperer who decodes all of Your Gracious Host's cunningly obscure writings! Now we can ALL know what Our Host wants us to believe!

      Delete
    4. Somerby is clearly squeamish when it comes to sexism, racism, and xenophobia; he barely hides this, sorry if obvious inference is not your thing.

      Delete
    5. Bob is backward on all issues.

      Delete
    6. Other than the Right-wing grievances, Somerby's writing is opaque.

      Delete
  5. Here is a video and transcript of the testimony of Katy Johnson, who claims (credibly) that Donald Trump raped her at the age of 13:

    https://www.borowitzreport.com/p/she-says-trump-raped-her-when-she?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

    This comes from Andy Borowitz and Kate Manne. There are over 1000 victims of Epstein, which has yielded a lot of testimony against Epstein, Maxwell, and the wealthy men who engaged in sex with these girls when they were 12-16 years old (too young for legal sex). Those who think there is no evidence against these men are very wrong. Epstein and Maxwell were convicted. There are emails showing Trump's complicity, and Johnson's testimony against him. She says Maxwell put her into a blonde wig so that Trump could fantasize that she was Ivanka.

    It is time to take this seriously and do something about the pedophile in the presidency. It is not enough to release the files. It is time to impeach and remove Trump from office. If there were more women in Congress, this would be happening. Why are men dragging their feet on this? Because they imagine themselves in the places of the rich men who were Epstein's clients? They need to spend more time imagining their own daughters in the clutches of greedy men like Epstein, Trump and the client list.

    If our leaders in Congress cannot motivate themselves to deal with this example of wealth used for evil, then how can we expect them to deal with any other problem affecting our nation? What good are they? It is time to remove Trump and clean up the mess he has made.

    Somerby is on the wrong side of this issue. Gutfeld's juvenile name-calling of women is unimportant. This Epstein scandal matters and Somerby has yet to support women's claims against wealthy abusers. Too busy reading My Antonia, perhaps, or dreaming about the abuse of women in Homer's Iliad, which he considers to be the true sexual politics. Throw them off the walls and into the see if the bitches complain, says Homer, while Somerby nods in agreement. That's the real sexual politics, amirite Somerby?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Throw them off the walls and into the see if the bitches complain, says Homer"

      Really? Did Homer recommend this as a practice? Was the Iliad a prescriptive work, dumbass?

      Delete
    2. Somerby’s reaction to Homer is the point.

      Delete
    3. What you say about Somerby is that he nods in agreement, so your statement presupposes the importance of what he's agreeing to, which takes us back to what you say about Homer.

      Delete
    4. If Somerby has a sexist reaction to the Iliad, that is hardly surprising.

      Delete
    5. The Iliad is sexist.

      Delete
  6. Trump as piggy (from Tiedrich):

    https://nymag.com/press/2018/04/nymag-corruption-cover.html

    It is from 2018 but things have only gotten worse since then.

    Where does Gutfeld get his vocabulary of slurs against women? Straight from Dear Leader, who thinks fat is bad but greedy snuffling up bitcoin and bribes is A-OK.

    Needless to say, Jacobs is not anywhere close to being a piggy (fat) but men who manipulate women know that's a terrible insult, that women fear looking fat, so it doesn't matter whether it is true of not. Our society is fatphobic, witness Trump's hiring standards and his new rule about no visas for fatties, while he himself gets to be as obese as he wishes. Gosh, could that be another double standard?

    Like Gutfeld, men lash out in cruel ways against women who are saying things they don't want to hear.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love Cecelia. She’s not obese.

      Delete
    2. But she jacks off.

      Delete
    3. Anonymouse 1:40pm, I have an old man. Not Cecelia’s Old Man, but a man who is my man nonetheless. I’m naturally very generous so feel free to shower David with ALL your love. Don’t hold any of it back.

      Delete
    4. Cecelia, sometimes I disagree with you, but I always love you. And I respect your relationship with your husband.

      Delete
    5. Cecelia is a man pretending to be woman, going along with this con just makes one look very foolish.

      Delete
    6. Cecelia is a married woman. She still jacks off, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

      Delete
    7. Cecelia jacks off in the same way that Somerby jacks off.

      There is no law against that. More power to him.

      Delete
  7. Somerby: "A whole lot of people do seem to like Gutfeld's "comedy stylings.""

    Somerby seems unaware that Gutfeld's lead in the ratings is by default, a consequence not of attracting a large audience, but of audiences leaving broadcast/cable tv in droves. In reality the audience, due to the democratization of media, has moved on to independent media, whose audience dwarfs that of broadcast/cable tv.

    America is waking up to the fact that Trump and the Republicans are incompetent, corrupt, and criminal.

    Somerby seems unaware of this too. Apparently, he is too busy jacking off to Gutfeld and the DSM and right wing storytellers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There’s nothing wrong with jacking off.

      Delete
    2. There is if you're doing it to Gutfeld.

      But 12:46 mistakenly says that Gutfeld leads the ratings by default, as if the viewers had a binary choice between Gutfeld and independent media. But they can also watch MSNBC and CNN, thought not many do.

      Delete
    3. Gutfeld is the funniest and smartest Right-winger in the history of the world. Why shouldn't he have great TV ratings?

      Delete
    4. Because he jacks off.

      Delete
    5. Gutfeld's jacking off is the smartest, most well-thought-out economic plan the Right has ever come up with.

      Delete
    6. No, I think 12:46 gets it right, Fox News has had higher ratings than CNN and MSNBC for years, due to the psychological makeup of Fox News viewers, but they all have been in relative decline, and in particular other broadcast/cable tv outlets have fallen off a cliff, so that is why Gutfeld leads by default - it is a meaningless circumstance, as someone noted the other day, it is like touting the third most popular horse buggy back when cars had taken over.

      Delete
    7. Every Democrat watches Fox News for hours, every day. That's not a lot of people, but still, it fills a niche.

      Delete
    8. Murdoch loses money on Fox News, it survives not because it is popular or profitable, it is neither, but it does provide emotional comfort for right wing snowflakes who struggle to have meaningful relationships with fellow humans.

      Delete
  8. What are comedy stylings?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Trump's doctors say his heath is failing so rapidly, his days of raping pre-teens might be over.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Laura Loomer says the GOP has a Nazi problem.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The GOP is pro Nazi.

    Whether that is a problem or not is up to your values.

    Back in the day, without American right wingers supporting the Nazis, they would have never gotten anywhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stalin negotiated a non-aggression pact with Hitler. American Communists then supported the Nazis, until Hitler violated the pact.

      Delete
    2. Stalin was a right wing authoritarian that ran a system of state capitalism.

      The Nazis' first target, before Jews, was leftists/communists/social democrats, who never supported Nazis.

      Americans that supported the Nazis ranged from Prescott Bush to Henry Ford to a bunch of corporations, some of which still exist.

      Right wing Americans held a big rally at Madison Square Gardens for the Nazis in 1939, organized by the German American Bund, which Trump's dad was a member of. Trump revived that rally in his 2024 campaign, it was this manner of inclination on Trump's part that had JD Vance call Trump "America's Hitler".

      Delete