BACKLASH: We shouldn't normalize this, they said!

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2025

It's been normalized for the past many years: We interrupt our Backlash retrospective to report what Jim VandeHei said.

He spoke at 6:20 Eastern on today's Morning Joe. This is what he said:

"In what world is that OK?"

In what world is that [conduct] OK? VandeHei sensibly asked. He directed his question at President Trump's latest unusual conduct. 

The president had done something unusual. In this case, even the somewhat permissive New York Times has reported the conduct in question:

Trump Berates One Reporter and Tells Another, ‘Quiet Piggy’

President Trump assailed an American journalist in the Oval Office on Tuesday for asking Saudi Arabia’s crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, about the violent death of a Washington Post columnist at the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul in 2018. U.S. intelligence has said the attack was carried out on the prince’s orders.

“You don’t have to embarrass our guest by asking a question like that,” Mr. Trump told the journalist, Mary Bruce of ABC News, later referring to her query as “a horrible, insubordinate, and just a terrible question.”

“A lot of people didn’t like that gentleman that you’re talking about,” Mr. Trump said, referring to the murdered journalist, Jamal Khashoggi. “Whether you like him or didn’t like him, things happen.” The prince has denied involvement in the killing.

It was the second time in a week that Mr. Trump had leveled a fierce insult at a woman who was covering him.

For better or worsewe'd say for worsethere he had gone again! The president had assailed Mary Bruce (ABC News) for asking a fairly obvious question about Mohammed bin Salman. 

That said, it was the "fierce insult" directed at a second female reporter which generated VandeHei's question on today's Morning Joe.

Last Friday, the president had said "Quiet, Piggy" to Catherine Lucey (Bloomberg News) during a scrum on Air Force One. As the Times report continued, it described that bit of unusual conduct on the commander's part. For Mediaite's report of that incident, you can just click here.

For reasons which so make obvious sense, the Times report had stressed the fact that this insult had been directed at a female reporter. Mediaite filed several reports describing pushback within the mainstream press against this cutting remark. Headline included, one such report started like this:

‘I Just Don’t Understand How Somebody Acts Like This’: Anderson Cooper at a Loss After Trump’s ‘Piggy’ Insult

CNN’s Anderson Cooper expressed bafflement at how President Donald Trump can keep lobbing juvenile insults at others, only for “everyone” to essentially shrug in response.

On Friday night, Trump took questions from reporters aboard Air Force One, where Bloomberg reporter Catherine Lucey asked the president about the Epstein files. When Lucey tried to ask a follow-up, Trump grew irritated and said, “Quiet, quiet, piggy!”

"I know diversity and actually treating people with decency and human kindness is not, you know, what’s popular today in some quarters," Cooper was quoted saying. "But I just don’t understand how somebody acts like this time after time, and everyone just pretends like, 'Oh, that’s just what this guy does.' ”

In response, Navarro was quoted saying this: "We’ve grown numb to it. And I think we have to fight that urge to normalize it and get numb to it."

Lucey has long been a highly regarded Washington reporter. She has worked an array of high-end news orgs, including the Wall Street Journal and the Associated Press.

Fellow reporters were pushing back against the latest bit of unusual behavior by President Trump. But in fact, this type of conduct has been widely "normalized" in recent years, in part with respect to President Trump, but also on a nightly basis by the Fox News Channel.

We've noted it here again and again, and then again and again. In a late September profile of the Fox News Channel's Kat Timpf, Amanda Hess of the New York Times finally had the courage to report what she saw and heard when she sat in the studio audience watching a taping of the nightly Fox program, Gutfeld!

In last Friday's report, we posted what Hess said about the Gutfeld! show in question. What did Hess see as she sat in the studio audience? We refresh you with these excerpts:

Mr. Gutfeld’s style mixes anti-liberal insult comedy with relentless punchlines about women’s bodies—their age, their weight, their sexual attractiveness. Each night, Ms. Timpf sits at his right-hand side, playfully challenging him while staking out an alternate style of physical humor—one that centers her own experience inhabiting a woman’s body.

I met Ms. Timpf on a Tuesday morning in August, on her second day back at “Gutfeld!” after a reconstructive surgery in which the tissue expanders inserted behind her chest muscle during the mastectomy she underwent in March were replaced with permanent breast implants.

[...]

The night before, Ms. Timpf had made her return to “Gutfeld!” just as the backlash to the backlash to Sydney Sweeney’s campaign for American Eagle jeans was fomenting on the right. A former heavyweight pro wrestler known as Tyrus offered his take on [Sidney] Sweeney’s female critics: “They look like a bag of oatmeal and they’re ugly and mean,” he said.

[...]

At the top of the show, Mr. Gutfeld delivered a battery of topical jokes in which he matched pieces of the day’s news with verdicts on liberal women’s bodies. Hillary Clinton is ugly. Joy Behar is old. Nancy Pelosi is old. Rosie O’Donnell is fat, Whoopi Goldberg is fat, Lizzo is fat, a professor of political science you’ve never heard of is fat...

Fat fat fat fat fat fat fat, but also ugly and old. Last Friday, we offered links through which you could watch this stream of insults yourself. 

That said, this sort of thing takes place, night after night after night after night, on the primetime "cable news" program. Over here in Blue America, our news orgs have agreed to help normalize this.

In the final passage we've posted, Hess offered an explicit account of what she saw in the Gutfeld! show she attended. In the half dozen profiles of Gutfeld and the Gutfeld! show which have appeared this year, it was the most explicit account of the program's persistent insult culture as directed at "women's bodies." 

That said, even this account understated the extent to which the primetime program feeds on insults of this type. And Hess's account came very late in her lengthy profile of the Gutfeld sidekick, Timpf. 

To her credit, Hess reported this building-block of this braindead show in a way which exceeded the accounts offered by other profiles. But even Hess, we'd have to say, under-reported the extent of the misogyny-adjacent insult culture which is one of the principal building blocks of this highly unusual program.

Quite sensibly, Cooper and Navarro voiced concern about the way the president's insulting treatment of female reporters has perhaps been normalized. But as we've been noting for years, no one within the Blue American cultural sphere has ever chosen to report what Greg Gutfeld actually does, on a nightly basis, on his heavily watched Fox News Channel program.

On Gutfeld!, he insults directed at liberal women go on and on, on a nightly basis, as Timpf just sits there and watches. The program's large "cable news" viewership is told that these liberal women are too old and too ugly, but mainly that they're just too fat fat fat fat fat.

This braindead conduct goes on and on, and then it goes on some more. Over here in Blue America, no one says a word. 

In Hess's profile of Timpf, she described this conduct in a way other profiles haven't done. Indeed, other journalists who have profiled Greg Gutfeld and his braindead show have possibly seemed to go out of their way to misdescribe, or to disappear, this highly unusual conduct. 

Based on appearances, it looks like no one really wants to report or discuss this unusual conduct. Thinking back to Susan Faludi's Backlash, we repeat our question:

Why not?

VandeHei asked an excellent question on today's Morning Joe. "In what world is that [conduct] OK?" the gentleman sensibly asked.

Tomorrow: "Misogynist," one observer said, midway through Hess's profile. But this fraudulent, stupid "cable news" program is also remarkably coarse.


71 comments:


  1. "assailed"? How horrible.

    Perhaps the Democrat media should use a time-machine to go back into 2016 and refrain from "assailing", smearing and lying about The Donald non-stop for the last 10 years.

    And then come back here and see if he is still going to be "assailing" any flunkey of theirs in November 2025.

    Frankly, I'm kinda curious myself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are tears--real tears!-- in my eyes because of all the Trump lickspittle snowflakes who've found so many comments to be so hurtful for so many years.

      Awww. Poor little trumptard.

      Delete
    2. Trump never promised to pardon Antifa on Day One, but he did it anyway.

      Delete
    3. Trump is an incredibly nasty life long fuck up who lives on three gifts - a half million inheritance, then after failing at all levels of business was gifted a TV show to read a teleprompter uttering your fired, then showed his racist ass re: Obama, cementing his supporters love. Who is unfairly attacking the stupid as rock life long fuck up who can't stop grifting more money from the idiot rubes? And why is it our fault there are so many asshole racists and dumb fucks who support him?

      Delete

    4. Nice. Squeal, squeal, Democrat.

      Delete
    5. Mao, still a dick wit troll after 2.5 decades. Perseverance my man.

      Delete
    6. 1:50, Trump inherited nearly half a BILLION, not million.

      And yes Fred Trump is turning over in his neglected grave from how his son threw all that money away on failed business ventures.

      Delete
    7. Bankruptcy lawyers love him though.

      Delete
  2. The NY Times says:

    "It was the second time in a week that Mr. Trump had leveled a fierce insult at a woman who was covering him."

    Somerby says, directly following:

    "For better or worse—we'd say for worse—there he had gone again!"

    Why would anyone say "for better"? What is in Somerby's mind when he writes a phrase like that?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because 'for better or worse' is well known and widely used in the English language (with which you appear not to be familiar).

      Delete
    2. It is inappropriate in this context because there is no "for better" in this situation. So perhaps Somerby thinks there is something that justifies Trump's behavior. If so, he should say so, not just hint at it.

      For Better or Worse is a saying, but it is used in situations where it makes sense. This doesn't.

      Words matter.

      Delete
    3. "If so, he should say so, not just hint at it."

      Let's see, did Somerby hint that there was a justification for Trump's behavior? He said he felt it was 'for worse'. That seems to say he didn't think there was a justification.

      Do words only matter sometimes?

      Delete
    4. Yes, he said "For better..." when there is no for better. What for better lurks in Somerby's mind? He never says, when he tosses out provocative remarks like this. This isn't a both-sides (pick-one) matter. Why does he imply it is?

      Delete
    5. The "better" would be for Dems and the public at large since Trump's behavior is catching up with him; the "worse" is for Republicans since Trump is becoming very bad for Republican branding in the long term.

      Somerby's goal is to promote and protect an elite class of rulers.

      Delete
  3. "Last Friday, the president had said "Quiet, Piggy" to Catherine Lucey (Bloomberg News) during a scrum on Air Force One. "

    scrum definition: "a disorderly crowd of people or things"

    How disorderly can a bunch of reporters be on Airforce 1, an airplane? Using a word that suggests the reporters were disorderly would seem to justify Trump's disorderly reply to them. One imagines them all speaking at once, perhaps pushing and shoving. But is that what happened? Seems Trump was mainly upset because she asked a question about Epstein that he didn't want to answer.

    The objectionable part of Trump's statement is calling a female reporter "piggy." Pretending it was justified by the unruliness of the reporters as a crowd is ridiculous. That this word comes to Trump's mind is the problem because it reveals how he thinks about women. He wouldn't use it with a man. It objectifies the woman by focusing on her body and appearance instead of her role as a reporter much less her humanity. Referring to a press Q&A session as a gaggle (of geese) or as a scrum is derogatory too but not gendered, not a fat slur.

    But this is how the NY Times tries to whitewash and minimize Trump's misbehavior.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Using a word that suggests the reporters were disorderly would seem to justify Trump's disorderly reply to them"

      Do you write such sentences in lieu of morning yoga? I can only imagine the flexibility such pretzel-like reasoning lends to your mind.

      "Pretending it was justified by the unruliness of the reporters as a crowd is ridiculous."

      The only thing more ridiculous is pretending anyone actually thinks that way.

      Delete
    2. When someone expresses a thought that you would not have come up with, it should broaden your thinking. Consider it and agree or disagree, but the impulse to ridicule someone because they think differently than you is the essence of intolerance. People think all kinds of different things. It is part of what makes the world interesting.

      Delete
    3. I agree one shouldn't ridicule people with whom one disagrees.

      However, when the thought expressed is devoid of sense or connection to reality, but seems to emerge without going through any rational filter, then ridicule is not only appropriate, but called for.

      Delete
    4. So, do it with counter-arguments instead of name-calling. You are the one who sounds like an idiot when you don't attempt to say what you find objectionable.

      Delete
    5. Correction: She tried to ask about Khashoggi not Epstein.

      Delete
    6. As a liberal no. Press scrum is a well worn phrase. That the President is a racist, sexist, idiot are all selling points that gets him elected by racist, sexist, idiots.
      So much winning for the knuckle draggers of the world: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:t6ubj2wlhc34awzcymh3qpur/post/3m5ydgwzuvc2x?ref_src=embed&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fmockpaperscissors.com%252F

      Delete
    7. Quaker in a BasementNovember 19, 2025 at 2:59 PM

      "Using a word that suggests the reporters were disorderly would seem to justify Trump's disorderly reply to them."

      Wrong. Common usage. An informal Q and A with several reporters at once is routinely called a "scrum."

      Delete
  4. Trump's critics are the biggest hypocrites in the world. They're on their fainting couches because Trump insulted a reporter, calling her 'piggy.' But, they don't blink an eye over decades of far more disgusting insults AT Trump. These people don't really care about decorum or propriety. They just want to get Trump.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh boo hoo hoo. Boo hoo hoo hoo hoo.

      Poor, thin-skinned Trump and his thin-skinned snowflake enablers feel so sorry for themselves because they've been insulted over the stupid, evil, cruel things Trump does.

      You really are a dickhead

      Delete
    2. Which reporter has been calling Trump piggy? Inquiring minds want to know. Should a president engage in tit-for-tat when insulted?

      I am calling for Trump's doctor to release his BMI.

      Delete

    3. Well, Soros-monkey, if you call me "Hitler" a thousand times, and then I call you "piggy" twice, I figure I'll still have to call you "piggy" about a hundred thousand times before we get tit-for-tat even.

      Delete
    4. Now I've gone into another round of sobbing for you, the most sensitive and delicate trumptard of them all.

      If only I could go back in time and undo all the wrongs you've experienced, then you could be the trumptard you've always wanted to be.

      Delete
    5. Trump is the American Hitler (as J.D. Vance said). The reporter in question is not overweight. Telling the truth is not an insult. Trump admires and says good things about Hitler (ask John Kelly and Nick Fuentes). Many Republicans luv Hitler (they said so in emails to each other). He doesn't think that is an insult, but he obviously thinks being called fat (while actually thin) is an insult.

      Delete
    6. Trump is president. The reporter didn't hurl any insults at him. The "they've done worse" -- whoever "they" are -- refrain is idiotic.

      Delete
    7. "Trump is the American Hitler."

      And you are a piggy, Soros-monkey. What's problem?

      Delete
    8. Hey trumptard, what are you going to spend your $2,000 tariff check on? Boner pills?

      Delete
    9. My unpilled boner is perfectly satisfactory.

      Delete
    10. Ilya - I see it differently. Trump is President, so he is particularly deserving of respect.

      Delete

    11. Compared to Soros-monkey Democrat journos, everyone is particularly deserving of respect.

      Delete
    12. 1:12,
      Your daily calls to see Trump's long-form birth certificate is all the proof I need to know how serioius you are.

      Delete
    13. DiC, that reporter never called Trump Hitler or anything else. She asked a legitimate question. Was her question disrespectful? Only in your MAGAt world.

      There is also no logic in saying “some people called Trump names, so it’s perfectly ok for him to call someone a name who never called him a name.” He just doesn’t like tough questions, so he insults the questioner.

      Also, the President deserves respect? If only you MAGAts believed in that as a principle. Your treatment of Obama and Biden was shameful.

      Delete
    14. Ilya - I see it differently.

      We know, Dickhead. That is because you are a fucking fascist freak. We don't have fucking Kings here in America, you fucking fascist. Go click your heels somewhere else, fuckface.

      Delete
    15. Trump's outright disdain for Republican voters is something every great American should respect.

      Delete
    16. 11:48 - quit quoting the Vice President of the United States of America. It makes you all look bad.

      Delete
    17. Who is insulting the orange face fat fuck? Just the facts man. You fascist fuckhead.

      Delete
    18. Your treatment of Obama and Biden was shameful.

      President Clinton says "hold my beer".

      Delete
    19. Hey fuck head fascist David, how much respect you people afford the "Magic Negro" you fucking piece of shit liar.

      Delete
    20. Trump is the least respectful president when it comes to American citizens, so why should they afford him any more respect than he pays them?

      Delete
  5. No one on the left has agreed to normalize Gutfeld. The left has no control over Fox programming. We cannot stop what Gutfeld is doing. Meanwhile, Gutfeld (and Fox) have first ammendment rights to say what they want as long as it conforms to the restrictions on free speech. By framing Gutfeld as a comedian, it places his insults in the category of satire, which gives them more latitude in what they say. Somerby, as a former standup comedian, must understand the rules that apply to speech on stage to a comedy routine. Women have no basis to sue Gutfeld when he calls them fat.

    We on the left support free speech, even when it says something we do not approve or agree with. The right to free speech is a more strongly held value than defending Rosie O'Donnell (who can take care of herself against Gutfeld).

    I do not understand why Somerby keeps telling Blue America that we should do something about Gutfeld. No one in their right mind thinks we approve of him, but he has the right to say what he does. So, what is the point of Somerby railing against Blue America's silence day after day? I think the railing is the point -- by calling Blue America hypocritical or weak or cowardly or whatever Somerby is implying by calling us out, he furthers negative stereotypes of Democrats and appeals to those manly virtues displayed by men in bar fights and brawls. It makes Democrats appear effete, even "gay" (in Republican terms). And it isn't as if Gutfeld has gotten worse or changed his insults, so what is new about his show that Somerby must bring it up over and over and over? Absolutely nothing. So it appears that this is Somerby's assignment -- disparage the left -- and not something motivated by any real issue or concern.

    Somerby used to complain about the way Rachel Maddow ridiculed right wing figures. She reduced her on screen time, so he has switched to this other tactic for complaining about the left. Every worker ant has his role, and Somerby obviously has his, but I doubt this will have any impact on Democratic voters or the right wingers expected to switch away from Trump and the Republicans in the midterms.

    If Somerby is saying that Trump is doing nothing more than what Gutfeld does every night, that doesn't excuse Trump's behavior. Gutfeld is a comedian by profession. Trump is president of the USA. He is expected to have more dignity and to show respect to the press, who are doing their job. Further, Gutfeld is scripted whereas Trump is showing a lack of self-control, behaving with poor control when a grown man should know better and be able to restrain himself. And Gutfeld's script is written by his staff of writers, whereas Trump gave everyone a glimpse into the cesspool of his mind, showing the way he thinks about women and supporting whatever evidence will emerge of his abuse of women. Now, of all times, is when he should be respectful of women if he wants to deny the content of the Epstein files. Yet he did the opposite.

    I doubt we will find Gutfeld's name in the Epstein files. For all his faults, he seems more normal than these perverted billionaires and their hangers on (such as Larry Summers and Dershowitz).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So you are saying a weirdo like Trump is all in on raping little girls.

      Delete
    2. Trump's victims are saying that too.

      Delete
  6. "Over here in Blue America, no one says a word. "

    Kate Manne is part of Blue America. She wrote an entire book about feminist considerations in complaints about women's weight. She used the term "fatphobia".

    "Unshrinking: How to Face Fatphobia" (2024)

    Feminists are part of Blue America and have been talking about fat (and appearance demands) as a women's issue for decades. How many people in Blue America have to talk about this before Somerby notices? He has picked out this one criterion (complaints about Gutfeld) as an indicator of interest by Blue America and accepts no substitutes. That is unfair, gives an inaccurate picture of how the left feels about fat jokes aimed at liberal women, and ignores the many ways the left supports a change in the appearance-related demands placed on women.

    Somerby would no doubt consider the opinions about fat jokes on the left to be excessively woke, if this weren't the drum he is beating to criticize liberals today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Quaker in a BasementNovember 19, 2025 at 3:05 PM

      "Somerby would no doubt consider..."

      "No doubt.: Thanks for this captivating insight.

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. They will, they will; they just needed some time to whitewash them first.

      Delete
  8. Trump is falling deeper and deeper into the throes of dementia, characterized by the lack of personal awareness and belligerence. This is what the media needs to focus on. I understand that Bob thinks that we need to discuss Trump's mental illness/personality disorder, with which he's been afflicted since childhood; however, here and now, Trump's falling further and further into the throes of dementia is more salient.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pity the child. Pity the geezer.

      Delete
    2. But Ilya, without a near-consensus from the entire profession, it would just be a restating of the left's disagreements with Trump into psychiatry's pseudo-scientific language.

      Who would be convinced by it that is not already convinced?

      Delete
    3. Republicans surrounding Trump need to recognize his dementia and use Article 25 to remove him from office before he does more harm. Creating a public consensus in support of that may make it easier for them to do. You do not need 100% agreement to create a better climate for Republicans to do their duty.

      Delete
    4. Hector -- I think that it'll resonate with a fair number of people that Trump's behavior is reminiscent of their grandma/grandpa as they experienced an onset of sunsetting and dementia. It's both good politics and accurate to point out that Trump is showing tell-tale signs. I've listened to at least on expert in the infinite podcast universe who would be happy to rattle off a whole bunch of symptoms.
      Doesn't Trump's behavior strike you as qualitatively different than how a normal adult would behave? It's worthwhile to pound on that topic. Lots of voters are already having second thoughts about Trump.

      Delete
    5. Anon@12:32 -- I can't imagine Trump's cabinet invoking the 25th amendment. It's easier for them to wait until Trump croaks or has a stroke that will knock him out of the game naturally. However, it's still expedient to keep pounding on that point.
      I am curious what's going to happen in a year or so when Trump's symptoms become impossible to ignore.

      Delete
    6. Hector,
      They care no more about Trump's dementia, than they do about Trump's sexual predation of minors or inflation.
      You need an action by Trump that will hurt them deeply. Say, Trump calling for the federal government to provide blacks with reparations for slavery.

      Delete
    7. He is no worse then Ronnie Raygun Ilya, what's the big deal?

      Delete
    8. Ronald Reagan was the worst President in the history of the United States, by far.
      Don't take my word for it. Ask any Democrat, Republican, or Independent.

      Delete
    9. Biden reserved his ire for the questions from the public:

      https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1133246

      “Biden said the question was legitimate but then asked whether she had "ever been to a caucus" before.

      She signaled that she had, to which Biden said: "No, you haven't. You're a lying dog-faced pony soldier."

      https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/12/05/biden-calls-iowa-voter-damn-liar-and-fat-after-ukraine-accusation.html

      “You're a damn liar, man!' – Joe Biden blasts Iowa voter, calls him 'fat' after man repeats Ukraine smear. “


      Delete

    10. So, Dementia Joe had dementia when he was the figurehead in WH. His dementia was widely publicized last year. And that was when you learned this word: "dementia". And how you happily use it.

      Is that it, Ilya?

      Delete
    11. It's a mistake, to which Somerby frequently alludes, to consider Trump voters as a uniform block. Maybe 20% are hard MAGA, with another 20% being MAGA adjacent. The rest can be peeled off.

      Delete
    12. IIya, you are correct and anonymices know that too. They will never admit it because this is about going after Somerby. Everything else, including Trump, is incidental to that goal.

      As to party fervor, among rank-and-file Republicans, Repubs are not as party-oriented as Democrats and are less likely to abandon family members or friends over political differences.

      Delete
    13. Hey Cecelia, news flash, Biden is not President. Now defend this shitpuddle: ""Really good friends": Trump embraces Saudi crown prince determined by US intelligence to have ordered the murder of a US resident, hosting a lavish White House visit even as his own family business negotiates lucrative deal with the Saudis" Is it all good to murder a journalist as long as Trump don't like him and as long as the corrupt mother fucker is getting cash stuffed in his britches? I do wonder what the fuck is wrong with Trump defenders , then realize they can't help it, they are ugly hateful, slow witted assholes too.

      Delete
    14. Hey Cecelia, news flash, Biden is not President. Now defend this shitpuddle: ""Really good friends": Trump embraces Saudi crown prince determined by US intelligence to have ordered the murder of a US resident, hosting a lavish White House visit even as his own family business negotiates lucrative deal with the Saudis" Is it all good to murder a journalist as long as Trump don't like him and as long as the corrupt mother fucker is getting cash stuffed in his britches? I do wonder what the fuck is wrong with Trump defenders , then realize they can't help it, they are ugly hateful, slow witted assholes too.

      Delete
    15. Anonymouse 2:31pm, we have to get along with the Saudis, That’s very important. Pres. Biden moved on from some sanctions and was sending the Saudi’s missiles in 2022. Is Trump supposed to restart that issue, NOW? Are you able to be less of a tunnel-visioned sap?

      Delete

    16. If you were an American President, 2:31 PM, and you had a choice: to get $1 trillion investment for your country or to call someone who's never been convicted of anything "murderer", I guess you would go for "murderer".

      And that's why you're an idiot Democrat and a Soros-monkey.

      Delete
    17. Plus, Jared will get real mad if "we" don't.

      Delete
    18. Cecelia’s Old Man, you can now buy Hunter Biden’s formerly 100k art for way less nowadays. You should try to get in on that.

      Delete
    19. It is fine to note Trump's dementia, it is way more pertinent to focus on Trump's corruption and criminality, which is what America is waking up to and which is way more actionable, and way more motivating for voters.

      Delete
  9. Trump's Epstein strategy: delay, delay, delay, giving enough time to whitewash the Epstein files.

    ReplyDelete