Supplemental: Perot siphons votes from the secret plan!


As Maddow recalls the Dean scream:
Sometimes, we find ourselves asking a basic question. If it weren’t for bogus stories about our elections, would we have any stories at all?

Is any part of American life more driven by stories which someone dreamed up and everyone else quickly memorized? When it comes to our White House elections, it’s narrative all the way down!

This thought came to mind when we read Kathleen Parker’s column in yesterday’s Washington Post. We were struck by her love for the Bushes and her snark at the expense of the Clintons—and by a famous old tale:
PARKER (1/17/15): [M]y favorite [candidate in Campaign 1988] was George H.W. Bush, who was courtly, kind, handsome and, most important, treated me as if I were his equal. This was more than a paternal gesture; it spoke to his quality, character and class—the thread that runs through my more than 30 years’ exposure to and experience with the Bush family.

By the time the senior Bush was elected president in 1988, I was writing a different sort of column, more lifestyle than politics, and was busy with motherhood. But his defeat four years later by Bill Clinton, thanks largely to the chart-happy vote siphon Ross Perot, signaled a turning point in American culture and, therefore, in my column and my politics.

Lifestyle and politics suddenly collided.

After the national trauma of the Clinton years, during which mothers like me were forced to shield our children from the president’s deeds, it was a relief to see George W. and Laura Bush move into the White House. If nothing else was certain, at least no one would have to worry about blue dresses, knee pads and cigars.

I became familiar with these Bushes, as their years in office coincided with my own migration to Washington. I remember a comment George W. Bush made to me during a one-on-one, in-flight interview. He said the toughest moment of his life wasn’t what to do after 9/11 but seeing his father—“this fine, fine man”—defeated by Clinton. I thought for a moment he might cry, but of course he wouldn’t.

I also got to know Laura Bush when she invited Greta Van Susteren and me to travel with her to the Middle East to launch a breast cancer awareness program in four countries. People say you can learn about a person’s character by playing golf with them. The same is true about traveling together, especially under challenging conditions. It wasn’t like dodging bullets in Bosnia, mind you, but sharing close quarters with Secret Service snipers provides its own sort of bonding tension.
Parker is rarely poisonous. In our view, that basic fact makes this column especially striking.

Regarding the Clintons, she manages to get it all in, including “the blue dress” and “dodging bullets in Bosnia”—and, of course, the notion that President Clinton reached the White House “thanks largely to the vote siphon Ross Perot.”

In November 1992, the exit polls said that Perot took votes from Candidates Clinton and Bush in equal amounts. But for Bush adherents, this alternate story is more pleasing. It was quickly invented, and it has never died.

That’s how Bill Clinton reached the White House. How about Richard Nixon? Just this week, perhaps for the first time, we encountered the claim that Candidate Nixon never said he had a “secret plan” to end the war in Vietnam.

Could that be an urban myth too? Based on a quick review, it seems that President Carter never said “malaise” and Candidate Nixon never said he had a “secret plan!” In September 2000, William Safire gave this account of the origins of the familiar story:
SAFIRE (5/21/00): In the 1968 primaries, candidate Richard Nixon was searching for a way to promise he would extricate the U.S. from its increasingly unpopular involvement in Vietnam. The key verb to be used was end, though it would be nice to get the verb win in some proximity to it.

One speechwriter came up with the formulation that "new leadership will end the war and win the peace in the Pacific." Nixon made it part of his stump speech, and the juxtaposition of end and win—though it did not claim to intend to win the war, but only the peace—drove his major opponent for the G.O.P. nomination, Gov. George Romney of Michigan, up the wall.

When a U.P.I. reporter pressed Nixon for specifics, the candidate demurred; the reporter wrote that it seemed Nixon was determined to keep his plan secret, though he did not quote Nixon as having said either secret or plan. But this gave Romney a chance to slam back at his opponent's promise. In what became the centerpiece of his stump speech in the snows of New Hampshire, Romney demanded to know, “Where is your secret plan?” That question skillfully presupposed an assertion of not just a general promise but also a detailed plan, and soon it became widely accepted that Nixon had said, "I have a secret plan to end the war.”

Years later, when a New York Times columnist attributed that direct quote to Nixon, a White House speechwriter challenged him to find the quote in anything taken down by pencil or recorder at the time. The pundit searched high and low and had to admit the supposed remark was unsourceable. (Look, the Nixon speechwriter was me and the columnist was my current colleague, Tony Lewis; I didn't have to research this.)
Sadly, it sounds all too possible.

Is there any story about our elections that someone didn’t invent, embellish, dream, massage or imagine? On Monday night, the analysts screamed in pain when they heard Our Own Rhodes Scholar recite the tired old tale from 2004 about stupid old Candidate Dean.

Needless to say, she was clowning about something Candidate Bush had said in his formal announcement speech that day. Still, she repeated the tired old tale about stupid old Candidate Dean and his ridiculous scream.

Warning! Clowning ahead!
MADDOW (6/15/15): There was this one moment today where [Bush] was a little owly.

Yes, “owl-ish,” I guess, is the way you say that. I didn’t expect the little owl noise. It was really great.

BUSH: So, here’s what it comes down to. Our country’s on a very bad course. And the question is, what are we going to do about it? The question for me—the question for me is, what am I going to do about it? And I’ve decided, I’m a candidate for president of the United States of America!


MADDOW: I did not see that coming. This is not an embarrassing thing that Jeb Bush did. This is not like Howard Dean with a scream in Iowa. This is not Jeb’s brother doing that “you’ve got to put food on your family” thing.

This is not bad. This is not something he has to live down. I don’t mean it that way. It was just unexpected. It was a very unexpected thing.

We made a little loop of it today. I’ve been watching it all day.

[Histrionically leans her head on her hand]

BUSH (videotape): Woo! Woo! Woo!

MADDOW: He’s got a little touch of the owl. Woo! And I say that as an owl fan. Woo!
As usual, Maddow was a) clowning extremely hard and b) talking about herself and her day. But she didn’t fail to ridicule Candidate Dean for the “embarrassing thing” he did when he “screamed” on the night of the Iowa caucuses.

(In the background, tape of Dean's famous “scream” appeared on the screen.)

She does this night after night after night. Can you possibly see why the analysts screamed Monday night?


  1. George Washington probably never copped to the cherry tree massacre either.

    That damn Rachel makes me cream. Then pleasure myself. With bucks in my pants.

  2. Maddow is MSNBC's official ornithologist. Owls say "woo," and toucans say "OOT-fray OOPS-lay". One thing for sure, Maddow certainly gives a hoot even if she isn't.

  3. Maddow posts seem to no longer draw many comments, birds or flies.

  4. Yes, Bob, the news media loves the Bushes and are doing what they can to help this latest one. Perot DID win the election for Clinton. You could see it in his face that he hated Bush the Elder. Perot had a longtime fan base and by the time the election was over, they hated Bush, too.

    Maybe Donald Trump will do the same thing this year with this Bush but the media will be trying to help Bush all the while. That Kathleen Parker article is a great example of how the press has built up this Nobility of the Bushes theme.

    I visit the Washington Post website everyday and look at the Politics section. Overwhelmingly Bush articles this week. A few Trump sprinkled in but mainly Bush, like he's the only one running for the GOP nomination. What are the rest of them doing? According to the Washington Post, they're not doing anything worth writing about but Jeb going on Jimmy Fallon's show got an article.

    1. The WaPo has been noted for swaying the Republican primary electorate.

    2. Perhaps not since '68 Nixon/Romney has major "high end" media seen as "the enemy" had a direct influence on Republican Party primary politics.

      The general election is another matter. If Bush were to win the nomination (by no means a given) he'd be in very good shape media-wise for the general election. Chomsky has argued that high end media narrative tends to filter down and throughout media. When a nationwide chorus of "journalists", pundits and "entertainers" cover the campaign as if they were writing for Tiger Beat when covering Bush, and with open contempt when covering Clinton, then be prepared for some unpleasant consequences.

    3. Chomsky? What credibility did he ever have? Next you will be citing Howard Zinn as your go to authority.

    4. @ 10:11,
      Maybe HRC needs to be interviewed by GloZell Green and Between Two Ferns with Zach Galifianakis like POTUS Obama did. That would make the WaPo front page.

    5. Maybe you should take a day off cicero.

    6. @10:11 either misses or ignores the part where Somerby mentions that Perot pulled as many votes from Clinton as from Bush. These memes persist because they serve purposes, like those of 10:11.

    7. Cicero is a piece-work employee, like a corn shucker or a manure gatherer.

    8. @ 1:37
      The real coin is raked in by the manure spreaders such as David Brock, John Koskinen, George Soros, George Robert Stephanopoulos, Dan Pffeifer, etc

  5. This post appeared at 4:28pm today. We all know what happened last night.

    Tonight Rachel Maddow played clips of President Obama addressing a series of mass killings with guns over the last several years. Then she said this (with apologies for inaccuracies and editing in transcription):

    "It is what it means to be President of the United States right now. It's part of the job. Talking to the American people about the latest mass shooting. Trying to make it make sense.

    With this latest one, with the white supremacist iconography associated with they guy, the white man shooting up a black church, maybe the right context here is its the latest white on black hate crime.....
    Maybe the relevant context here is the attack on places of worship...Maybe the relevant context here is the attacks on black churches in particular....Or maybe the relevant context is the attack on this church in particular.....they hanged the founder of this church. They outlawed black churches altogether.

    Maybe the relevant context is white supremacism and the list of crimes committed by people with white supremacist sympathies......

    Maybe the right context is the innocent lives of any of these innocent victims, or all of them. .....

    What counts as context here is its all either too obscene or too sacred. All we really, really know is this keeps happening. And every time its unbearable."

    Can you possible see why Bob and his analysts are irrelevant?

    1. Actually this quote demonstrates Maddow's irrelevance. A string of words saying exactly nothing because she is afraid to say anything meaningful on a subject fraught with emotion. You find her profound because she is pseudo-respectful.

    2. That you see my comment as a defense of Maddow indicates why you are a Somerby fan. Down to the dittohead the use of term "pseudo."

    3. Somerby didn't invent the word pseudo. If you feel misunderstood, try making comments using your own words instead of stringing together quotes and thinking you've said something. You are no different than Maddow.

    4. Pls explain why you bother if Bob is irrelevant.

    5. The shooting happened Wednesday night.

    6. @ 4:34 how observant.

  6. As a hard core apologist for southern racism (white devision) the shooting this week must be particularly tough on Bob. To use this killer as some sort of link to Rachel not going hard enough on Donald Trump is pathological. And what if She did go hard on Trump? She'd be just another example of liberals piling on an easy target. Very sad performance from Bob Today.

  7. "One of my favorites spots in New York City is the flower district," said Lloyd. "Not only do you have the flower shops, but you have the shops with all the ribbons, so that inspired these skirts — it was all the colors of the ribbons." She wore a skirt covered in said ribbons with a blue oxford shirt from kate spade surprise sale the new Broome line — Kate Spade's take on everyday, casual basics that were styled into the presentation and will debut at the brand's stores in the spring. In addition to sparkly and brightly colored dresses and separates, the collection featured plenty of the clever, kitschy bags the brand is known for — in the shape of a dog or a beehive, for example — that matched the springtime optimism of the clothes. For shoes, there were floral sneakers and loafers with bows, as well as studded flats and heels that were kate spade handbags reminiscent of Valentino's designs — but with the Kate Spade treatment of sparkles, bows and bright pink hues.
    In conjunction with the consolidation announcement, Burberry also said that it is investing £50 million to open a new trench coat manufacturing and weaving facility in Yorkshire, set to open in 2019.While Halloween is traditionally kate spade outlet store online spent with friends scarfing down sugary treats while dressed in costume, it's also an important time to shop, because there are currently a bevy of sales cropping up all over the Internet. With some offering goods up to 74 percent off, we can assure you these markdowns are just as thrilling as any of the haunted houses you and your gang might be attending on Saturday. As always, we've listed all our favorite online sales happening the weekend of Oct. 30 for you below. Happy hunting!After pairing up with Iris Apfel for Kate Spade's spring campaign, Karlie Kloss is back for another round, this time with fellow St. Louis native and longtime BFF, Derek Blasberg, who was cast alongside Kloss for the brand's holiday campaign. Because isn't spending time with kate spade handbags outlet your loved ones what the holidays are all about? After pairing up with Iris Apfel for Kate Spade's spring campaign, Karlie Kloss is back for another round, this time with fellow St.
    "It didn't have the name 'Ralph Lauren' on it," says Cohen, noting the success of offshoot brands Chaps by Ralph Lauren and Ralph Lauren Black Label. That said, it takes time — years — to start from scratch and build a namesake's marquee value and brand equity,

  8. 20 General, Science and Technology Public University is published the gst university admission result 2021 on the official website which is-