ON MADDOW SHOW, IT'S TIME FOR A CHANGE: Rachel's remarks on the EPA!

MONDAY, MARCH 21, 2016

Part 1–Propaganda and Flint:
Last Thursday, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee conducted its third formal hearing on Flint.

Thursday's hearing featured only two witnesses. Appearing together that day were Rick Snyder, the governor of Michigan, and Gina McCarthy, the head of the EPA.

As is often the case with such pony shows, this congressional hearing was largely a waste of time. In a major understatement, the New York Times' Abby Goodnough reported, on the paper's front page, that the hearing produced "few new facts."

By "few," Goodnough may have meant "none." Put then, it isn't just the House committee. Few news orgs have worked very hard to assemble a full set of facts about what happened in Flint.

What happened at last Thursday's fact-averse hearing? In large part, Republicans and Democrats took turns insisting that Snyder or McCarthy should resign.

To appearances, the standard soundbites had been crafted for maximum utility in members' home districts. As a general matter, Democrats instructed Snyder to resign. Republicans insisted that McCarthy needs to go.

We thought one member's performance stood out; by the end of the week, we'll post the bulk of what she said. That said, did we mention what the New York Times reported?

"Few new facts emerged from the four-hour hearing," Goodnough understatedly wrote. Then again, very few clear facts have yet emerged from Flint at all.

Snyder's presence made this the highest-profile hearing the committee has conducted so far, if not the most informative. Just how big was Thursday's hearing? So big that Rachel Maddow actually got off her aspic and pretended to discuss it.

Maddow's segment about the hearing came late in Thursday night's show. To watch that segment, click here.

The segment in question consumed seven minutes and 45 seconds, though that count is a bit misleading. Almost three minutes of Maddow's segment consisted in videotape of Snyder being scolded by Democrats Grisham and Cummings. But then, alas! Despite Maddow's posturing about this topic, viewers get very "few facts" about Flint from her increasingly broken program.

On Maddow's increasingly broken program, coverage of Flint has basically turned out to be propaganda. Viewers learn few facts from the show. Instead, they get pleasured with selective chunks of tribal propaganda.

Last Thursday night, Maddow pleasured us the liberal viewers by letting us see Snyder getting scolded. As she has done from the start, she shielded viewers from any criticism, complaint, point of concern or critique concerning the role of the EPA in what happened at Flint.

For Maddow, the children of Flint seem to be toys to be used for the purpose of tribal propaganda. Although she pleasurably pounded away at Snyder last Thursday, this passage represents her full account of the challenges aimed at McCarthy that day:
MADDOW (3/17/16): So, lots of this hearing today broke along expected partisan lines.

On Planet Democrat, they blame Governor Snyder and his emergency manager takeover of the city of Flint and his state agencies and his frankly obtuse leadership, where he supposedly had no idea of what all his senior staff and chief of staff were talking about and working on for months.

On Planet Republican, they blame the EPA. Which makes political sense for them. You don't need a diagram to see why bashing the EPA fits with the Republican worldview for a crisis like this.

But Governor Snyder said everybody should stop blaming anyone. Everyone should work with him to fix Flint. And then he spent two hours at that hearing blaming the EPA for what happened!

At the close of the hearing today, the ranking Democrat on the committee asked a final round of questions. Congressman Elijah Cummings kept the mike for more than ten minutes, question after question. Governor Snyder answered almost in a whisper at one point. And at the end, you could hear those Flint families in the room again.
At that point, viewers enjoyed two minutes of videotape of Cummings scolding Snyder. Viewers saw no footage of the criticism of McCarthy, which came from some Democrats as well as from many Republicans.

McCarthy's name was never mentioned during Maddow's segment. According to Maddow, the EPA had been scolded that day, but only for two reasons:

Because it "makes political sense" for Republicans to do so. Because the scolding of the EPA "fits with the Republican worldview."

("Look's who's talking," the analysts cried, as they saw Maddow voice that second framework.)

Our view? When she isn't mugging and clowning and drumming her desk and endlessly talking about herself, Rachel Maddow has become a full-blown propagandist. If we liberals have a soul or a brain, we should insist that her corporate owners get her off the air and into the shop for a bit of long-overdue work.

Our view? Maddow has used the children of Flint as a way to pleasure us with tribal gruel; as a way to satisfy her own rather juvenile cultural instincts; and, of course, as a way to fashion herself as a hero in the eyes of the world.

She has done extremely little to inform her viewers about the complex, puzzling set of events which have emerged, and failed to emerge, from the mess in Flint. At this point, very "few facts" emerge on Maddow's program concerning any serious topic. Her discussion of the EPA's role in the mess is a long-running case in point.

How odd! While Maddow was toying with viewers again, a major figure in the Flint story was appearing on a competing "news channel." The person in question is LeeAnne Walters, the Flint resident and parent who alerted an array of outside players (including the EPA) to the problem in Flint.

That same Thursday night, Walters appeared for an interview with CNN's gruesome Anderson Cooper. By everyone's account, Walters is one of the major heroes of the Flint story. By all accounts, she knows a great deal about what happened there.

But how odd! LeeAnne Walters has never appeared on the Maddow Show! According to a Nexis search, Maddow has mentioned her name just once, as part of a brief, selective account of what Walters told the House committee.

LeeAnne Walters has never appeared on the Maddow Show. And how odd! Barring a truncated appearance as part of a group on Maddow's hour-long town hall program from Flint, neither has Professor Marc Edwards, the aggressive expert from Virginia Tech who Walters called into the fight.

Neither Edwards nor Walters has ever appeared for a one-on-one interview with Maddow. Walters didn't even appear among the crush of guests, some of whom were rather tangential, on Maddow's town hall program from Flint.

Before last Thursday night, we could have imagined one possible reason for Walters' exclusion from Maddow's program. As we listened to what Walters told Cooper last Thursday, we came up with two more possible reasons–two more possible reasons why we liberals haven't seen Walters or Edwards interviewed on the Maddow Show.

If we the liberals have a brain, it's time for us to spot a fairly obvious point–it's very much time for a change of oil on the Maddow program. Before the week is done, we plan to discuss the emotional problems Maddow discussed on the air, at substantial length, with Terry Gross in 2012, then with Ben Wallace-Wells for this profile in Rolling Stone. In our view, Maddow's "journalism" has become so bad–her on-air behavior so erratic–that this topic should no longer be avoided.

We'll review those interviews by the end of the week. Tomorrow, though, let's look at what LeeAnne Walters told Anderson Cooper last week. While we're at it, let's revisit the testimony Edwards gave to that House committee in its two earlier hearings.

One of those hearings occurred last week. Despite her lugubrious interest in Flint, Maddow didn't mention it. Indeed, Our Own Cable Star has never reported what Edwards has said to the House committee at all! In our view, you can feel fairly confident that she never will.

More and more, we liberals learn "few facts" about any serious topic from Maddow's peculiar program. Her slender, selective work on Flint is a case in point.

Journalistically, we'd call her work a rapidly growing clown show. We'd say her downward slide points to an important larger question:

Despite the greed of her corporate owners, is it possible that a certain multimillionaire needs and deserves some help?

Tomorrow: The things we liberals don't have to hear as we watch Maddow's program


  1. Maddow's comments here seem pretty consistent with what Kevin Drum has written about the hearings. You might want to check that out if you would like the issue covered without a thumb on the scale for the left, but also without Maddow Derangement Syndrome.

  2. Just the facts. From Fact Finder Bob.

    Oh, there are few facts. Perhaps no facts. Certainly no full facts in this fact adverse world. Few new facts emerged. Very few clear facts have yet emerged. Viewers get very "few facts." Viewers learn few facts. At this point, very "few facts" emerge. More and more, we liberals learn "few facts" about any serious topic.

    1. You have done extremely little to inform Bob's readers about the complex, puzzling set of events which have emerged, and failed to emerge, from the mess in this post.

    2. Pleasured us the liberal
      Pleasured with selective chunks
      Pleasurably pounded propaganda
      Pleasure us with tribal gruel

    3. Her slender selective work masks a condidtion which we must discuss now that her work has become a growing clown show on a downward slide which has recently alarmed us since before she even got a show and we announced we would treat her with contempt.

  3. One thing is clear: private industry wasn't to blame . The blame goes entirely to government. The only question is how to allocate the blame among local, state and federal.

    Suppose a big private company had committed a comparable environmental sin. Would the punishment of that company and its employees be greater than that meted out to the guilty government employees?

    1. Dave the Guitar PlayerMarch 21, 2016 at 12:28 PM

      In private industry, unless there were specific criminal laws violated, the company involved would pay a fine as an incentive to do better. Somehow I don't think imposing a fine upon the government will work. Although, that is precisely what the Congressional Republicans did to "solve" the problems they discovered at the IRS. They cut their budget substantially, making it even harder for them to do their jobs properly.

    2. Well, DinC, let's see. About the time Al Gore, Jr. inspired Love Story, Occidental Petroleum bought Hooker Chemical. Hooker once dumped its waste in a canal in upstate new York.

      Later, while serving in Congress. Al Gore Jr. took the initiative in finding a little place called Love Canal and had hearings on the issue. As is often the case with such pony shows, this congressional hearing was largely a waste of time. At least, when recounting the history of Love Canal, the world's foremost expert does not even mention Al Gore, Jr. or his hearing.

      How Odd. If facts emerged, they did not emerge in the recounting of events which emerged and did not emerge. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Canal

      But how odd! Al Gore, Sr.'s role as counsel for Occidental Pertoleum, which owned the company which dumped the waste in Love Canal has never appeared in the Daily Howler.

    3. Suppose the accountant governor of a large rust-belt state and an appointee or two of his decided to create an emergency with the ultimate goal of making a particular municipal function so cost-prohibitive that the mayor of the particular municipality would be forced to privatize that function and the governors' friends would do the privatizing and subsequent running of the function while the governor could also maintain his "shrinking government" bona fides - and the whole thing blew up in his face nationally.

      Yeah, the blame is entirely on the government.

  4. The thing with Maddow is that she thinks she's a comedian. She has says that she does not see what she does as being that much different from a fake news show. She actually said that. Such are the depths of her delusion and ignorance.

    1. The thing with you is you actually say this same thing a lot in comments. With nary any documentation. You actually repeat this. Such is the depth of the belief you share with Bob that all readers here are rubes.

    2. Yeah. We're not rubes. We're Maddow fans. Cause she's boss.

      So smart. So funny. So honest. It's hard NOT to love her!

    3. I feel really horrible for all butthurt Bobfans everywhere.

  5. Anyone over the age of five who makes a conscious effort to act "cute" is creepy. Maddow is creepy.

  6. My life became devastated when my husband sent me packing, after 8 years that we have been together. I was lost and helpless after trying so many ways to make my husband take me back. One day at work, i was absent minded not knowing that my boss was calling me, so he sat and asked me what its was all about i told him and he smiled and said that it was not a problem. I never understand what he meant by it wasn't a problem getting my husband back, he said he used a spell to get his wife back when she left him for another man and now they are together till date and at first i was shocked hearing such thing from my boss. He gave me an email address of the great spell caster who helped him get his wife back, i never believed this would work but i had no choice that to get in contact with the spell caster which i did, and he requested for my information and that of my husband to enable him cast the spell and i sent him the details, but after two days, my mom called me that my husband came pleading that he wants me back, i never believed it because it was just like a dream and i had to rush down to my mothers place and to my greatest surprise, my husband was kneeling before me pleading for forgiveness that he wants me and the kid back home, then i gave Happy a call regarding sudden change of my husband and he made it clear to me that my husband will love me till the end of the world, that he will never leave my sight. Now me and my husband is back together again and has started doing pleasant things he hasn't done before, he makes me happy and do what he is suppose to do as a man without nagging. Please if you need help of any kind, kindly contact Happy for help and you can reach him via email: happylovespell2@gmail.com

  7. I have to thank the one man that was able to restore my broken relationship, I have always taught that white are more superior to black in all aspect of life, But this powerful spell caster called Dr.Abazara proved to me that intends of spell casting that Africans are the best. That is the reason why i will be recommending the services of Dr.Agbazara to all those that have been heart broken because just through these details: agbazara@gmail.com Or call +2348104102662 i was able to contact Dr.Agbazara and today i am happy

  8. I know this is a difficult time for you. I am so sorry. Sending prayers.
    gclub casino online