SAVING CANDIDATE HARRIS: PolitiFact forced to explain it again!


The (long-suffering) Fact-Checker's Tale:
When Chaucer penned his famous "Miller's Tale," he let his freak flag fly.

The leading authority on the tale offers such background as this:
"The Miller's Tale" (Middle English: The Milleres Tale) is the second of Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Tales (1380s–1390s), told by the drunken miller Robin to "quite" (a Middle English term meaning requite or pay back, in both good and negative ways) "The Knight's Tale."


The general prologue to The Canterbury Tales describes the Miller, Robin, as a stout and evil churl fond of wrestling. In the Miller's Prologue, the pilgrims have just heard and enjoyed "The Knight's Tale", a classical story of courtly love, and the host asks the Monk to "quite" ("repay" or "answer") with a tale of his own. However, the Miller insists on going next. He claims that his tale is "noble", but reminds the other pilgrims that he is quite drunk and cannot be held accountable for what he says. He explains that his story is about a carpenter and his wife, and how a clerk "hath set the wrightes cappe" (that is, fooled the carpenter). Osewold the Reeve, who had originally been a carpenter himself, protests that the tale will insult carpenters and wives, but the Miller carries on anyway.
The Miller carried on anyway! According to future anthropologists, so it went, in our own "modern" times, out on the campaign trail!

According to top anthropologists, glorious Chaucer was able to capture the essence of our "human" nature. In the manifestation under review, a drunken miller tells a tale designed to undermine an earlier tale—a knight's tale of courtly love.

It isn't like that with "The Fact-Checker's Tale," the highly familiar modern story we're forced to revisit today.

The fact-checker to whom we refer is PolitiFact's Louis Jacobson, an experienced Washington journalist who doesn't seem to be drunk or impaired in any discernible way.

Jacobson has been responding of late to The Candidate's Tale. More specifically, he keeps responding to a set of false and misleading claims Candidate Harris keeps making, with her staff persistently saying that her errors are merely "slips of the tongue on live TV" or examples of "misspeaking."

As such, Jacobson has been cast in the Sisyphus role, pushing the facts back up a steep hill to no useful effect. In his most recent attempt to "quite" the hopeful, he referred to this recent exchange between Harris and TV's Stephen Colbert:
HARRIS (5/21/19): The law says that men and women should be paid equally for equal work, but what we know is that in America today, women on average are paid 80 cents on the dollar of what men are paid for the same work. African American women, 61 cents on the dollar, Latinas 53 cents on the dollar. And these are actually not debatable points.

COLBERT: So this is not hours worked, on average. This is hour for hour.

HARRIS: Yeah, and for the same work. Or it could be the annual salary, but it’s for the same work.
Later, staffers told Jacobson that Harris had "misspoken" during that exchange with Colbert. That said, Harris had "misspoken" the exact same way the previous night on The Beat with Ari Melber, an appearance Jacobson didn't mention (see yesterday's report).

Nor had it started there. In late April, Jacobson corrected a giant "pay gap" howler emitted by Harris during a CNN town hall. On that occasion, Harris' misstatement had been a "slip of the tongue," according to The Harris Staffer's Tale.

Meanwhile, nothing makes this stop! Harris misspoke on this topic again last night, this time during an MSNBC town hall with Lawrence O'Donnell.

According to leading anthropologists, so it went among us humans in the years before Mister Trump's War. For today, let's limit ourselves to getting clear about the basic facts which underlie the so-called gender pay gap.

Alas, poor Stephen Colbert! On live TV, with citizens watching, The Candidate told him that "women on average are paid 80 cents on the dollar of what men are paid for the same work."

Colbert's reaction suggests that he may have known, or at least suspected, that this statement was bogus. That said, The Moderator's Tale will rarely include an actual challenge to a top guest of the political party he prefers.

Fact-checkers work by different rules! After quoting what Harris and Colbert had said, Jacobson correctly said this:
JACOBSON (5/23/19): In a nutshell, Harris incorrectly explained the meaning of the gender wage gap. The 80 percent figure is not an apples-to-apples comparison of men and women performing the same work. Instead, it refers to average pay for all jobs held by men and all jobs held by women.

When we reached out to the Harris campaign, they quickly acknowledged that Harris had misspoken, even after being prodded on the point by Colbert. Spokesman Ian Sams pointed out that Harris’ plan does not use the "for the same work" formulation.
Say what? The 80 percent figure is not an apples-to-apples comparison of men and women performing the same work? Harris had "misspoken" when she said that women are paid 80 cents on the dollar, as compared to men, "for [doing] the same work?"

So the staffer said! Pushing the stone back up the hill, Jacobson began to explain:
JACOBSON (continuing directly): The most recent official data on this point, published by the U.S. Census Bureau for 2017, showed that women earned 80.5 percent of what men did. That’s up by a couple percentage points in recent years, though it did not significantly change between 2016 and 2017.

As we’ve written previously, the 80 percent figure does not adjust for such factors as the degrees and jobs women pursue, the time they take off to care for children, the number of hours they work, and the years of experience they’ve had.

So while the 80 percent figure may be used to signify some facets of women’s challenges in the workplace—such as disproportionate representation in fields that offer more flexible work schedules, even if that means earning less—the statistic cannot be used to pinpoint pay discrimination between men and women doing the same work.
According to leading anthropologists, nothing anyone says or does will ever stop Harris, or other modern liberals, from "misspeaking" on this point. With that in mind, let's try to make one part of Jacobson's presentation a bit more clear:

The gender income gap

According to those census figures, there is a definite "income gap" between men and women who work full-time (35 hours or more per week). In 2017, the income of the average woman who worked full-time came to 80.5 percent of the income of the average man who worked full-time.

That is an actual "income gap" between the average man and the average woman. As Jacobson says, this income disparity may help define some actual social problems concerning "some facets of women’s challenges in the workplace."

But the Census Bureau doesn't claim, in any way, that this represents income received for having done "the same work." Indeed, just look at one part of what Jacobson says:

Among other things, that famous figure "does not adjust for such factors as...the number of hours [men and women] work." What can that possibly mean?

The number of hours full-time workers work

The Census Bureau defines a full-time worker as someone who works 35 hours or more per week. They key words are these: "or more."

When it comes to hours of work per week, full-time workers are not created equal! Many work 35 hours per week. Others work many hours more.

On average, male full-time workers work longer hours than female full-time workers. When you adjust for that one factor, the income, wage or pay gap does in fact start to shrink.

Within his widely-ignored tale, the fact-checker says something else. He says that 80.5% pay gap "does not adjust for such factors as...the jobs women pursue."

By that, Jacobson means that the 80.5% figure hasn't been adjusted for the different types of employment held by men and women on average, or for the roles within the various types of employment men and women may, on average, assume.

That is, somewhat more men may be found within higher-paying occupations, but that 80.5 percent figure hasn't been adjusted for that. Even within a given field, somewhat more men may be found within higher-paying niches—working as surgeons rather than as family practitioners, for example.

None of this has been adjusted for by the Census Bureau. When Harris says that 80.5% figure represents income or pay for men and women who do "the same work," she is flatly wrong, and it's very hard to believe that she doesn't actually know that.

On average, to what extent are women being underpaid "for the same work?" On average, are women underpaid for the same work at all?

How much are women underpaid? It's very hard to establish that point, but no specialist actually thinks that women are paid 80 cents on the dollar as compared to men for the same work. As far as we know, no one thinks the number is anywhere close to that.

We did a lot of work on this topic when Rachel Maddow conned her viewers back in April 2012. Tomorrow, we'll review the clown show Maddow staged at that time. To this day, Maddow's performance on the gender pay gap is one of the most amazing con jobs in "cable news" history, ever since that medium began to speed us towards the wages of Mister Trump's War.

For today, we'll draw our wisdom from sacred Chaucer, and from an array of anthropologists sorrowfully huddled in caves. We humans always loved our drunken tales, these future experts sadly say, reporting to us through the nocturnal submissions the haters refer to as dreams.

We loved our tales, these experts say, and we kept rewarding the people who told them. We rarely "held them accountable for what they said," even as we sat on the beach awaiting that onrushing war!

Tomorrow: The Cable Superstar's Ludicrous Tale

Friday: Saving Candidate Harris! These kid journalists today!


  1. "How much are women underpaid?"

    Like I said, dear Bob, it's far more likely that they are overpaid. Because no employer wants a lawsuit. Simple logic, Bob. Common sense.

    1. Conman sense is right.

    2. Psychologist Jordan Peterson believes women are sometimes paid less because they're less aggressive in salary negotiations. He trains his female clients to be more aggressive.

    3. Negotiating down his fees more aggressively, is a good place to start.

    4. "women are sometimes paid less because they're less aggressive in salary negotiations"

      Perhaps. But still more than men who are equally non-aggressive in salary negotiations. Y'know, comparing apples to apples...

  2. Somerby can’t even provide an original interpretation of Chaucer. He cedes that to Wikipedia.


    1. Therefore Harris should keep missstating?

    2. Harris is misstating Chaucer?

  3. “How much are women underpaid? It's very hard to establish that point, but no specialist actually thinks that women are paid 80 cents on the dollar as compared to men for the same work. As far as we know, no one thinks the number is anywhere close to that.”

    The aauw report linked to in the politifact article ( calculates an unexplained pay gap of 7%, after controlling for all other factors, although they do not show the raw data or the calculations to support it. Of course, they do not split out by race. One assumes the pay gap is worse for women of color.

    And as for “no specialist actually thinks that women are paid 80 cents on the dollar as compared to men for the same work”, we invite Somerby to peruse

    An example:
    The occupation of “education administrator” shows men median pay = 1563, women =1245, which is approximately 79.7% of men’s, and women make up approximately 65.7% of the profession.

    Perhaps there is a plausible explanation that erases the clear fact that women earn about 80% of men’s pay in this field. We have not seen such an explanation, not in any level of detail, nor has Somerby, but he is still willing to state with certainty what no specialist thinks, despite how supposedly hard it is to establish certainty.

    But I digress. Somerby isn’t talking about the pay gap. He is talking about Jacobson debunking Harris talking about the pay gap, but in so doing he, Somerby, goes into a fair amount of detail to define the pay gap, and discuss reasons why the pay gap might not be 80% due to various factors, although ‘this income disparity may help define some actual social problems concerning "some facets of women’s challenges in the workplace."’ he helpfully quotes Jacobson saying.

    In short, we are asked to trust media person Jacobson on the issue of Harris’s “con”. But above all, Somerby is merely an objective reporter of other people’s thoughts, and the fact that no one thinks the number is anywhere close to 80% “as far as he knows” surely is sufficient for him.

    1. The occupation of “education administrator” shows men median pay = 1563, women =1245, which is approximately 79.7% of men’s, and women make up approximately 65.7% of the profession.

      Perhaps there is a plausible explanation that erases the clear fact that women earn about 80% of men’s pay in this field.

      There’s no plausible explanation that can erase a clear fact like the fact that aggregate salary of female education administrators is 80% of male administrators. But no one is disputing the disparity of aggregate salaries. But the job of education administrator doesn’t fit in some single category. Before anyone can compare two education administrators, you have to ask them (at least) the questions below.

      And the answers are crucial to comparing salaries. Your link doesn’t work for me, but the bls site did tell me that West Virginia administrators’ salaries are about 60% of Connecticut administrators’.

      You don’t have to trust a media person or, for that matter, me. You can take your own trip through the google, including a stop at the site you reference. It should be clear that your slam-dunk case for bias isn’t.

      Where are you working?
          Private industry

      What level job do you have?
          Assistant Principal

      What type of teaching institution are you employed by?
          Private industry
          Public elementary or secondary school or district
          Private elementary or secondary school or district district    Public college or university
          Private college or university

      What’s the highest degree that you hold?

      What certificates do you hold?
          State teaching license
          Public school administrator’s license
          Superintendent certificate

      What state are you working in?

      How much experience do you have?

    2. Working overtime here deadrat. Why should any of these details favor men, if things were fair in the world?

  4. if things were fair in the world

    That’s adorable! No, really.

    Things aren’t fair in the world, and there are many structural reasons why men in the aggregate earn more than women. Didja even read what I wrote? Let me remind you: “[N]o one is disputing the disparity of aggregate salaries.” But if you think you can take a job title like education administrator, find that women with that title at median salary earn 79.7% of what men earn at median salary, and conclude there’s no plausible explanation, then you’re wrong.

    Now I interpreted “no plausible explanation” to mean no explanation other than separate pay scales based on sex. That is, two education administrators, one male and one female, doing identical work — and after all, they must be since they have the same title — will be paid differently.

    Now, if my interpretation is wrong, then I apologize. But that would be Harris’ claim, and it’s the only claim that TDH disputes.

    Note what this does not mean:

    Women aren’t paid less than men for the same work. They are, but not 20% less. I’ve read figures of 2% to 5%.

    Women who are paid less than men for the same work should just suck it up and stop whining. They shouldn’t. Such a pay policy is illegal, and if there are reasonable things to do to make it easier to correct that, then we should do them.

    We shouldn’t or can’t address the structural problems that keep women’s pay in the aggregate at 80% of men’s. We should. For example, decent family leave and child care policies would probably help.

    There are two excellent pragmatic reasons for accuracy. The first is that if you’re not, rightards will beat you like a rented mule with your misstatements. Thus providing a distraction from their misogynistic policies. The second is that if you set out for the wrong destination, you are unlikely to end up where you want to be. If you spend all your effort on pay scales and you’re successful, then the aggregate pay gap might drop to 15%, and you’ll wish you’d spent more time on child care, family leave, and encouraging girls to prepare for STEM careers.


    You think I worked overtime on my previous comment? Believe me, it wasn’t that hard. But the good news (for me) is that if I did work overtime, I was paid 20% more than a woman would have been paid.

    Or maybe it was 2%.

  5. When I meet DR JOHN, I was desperate to get my ex boyfriend back. He left me for another woman. It happened so fast and I had nothing to say about a situation. He just left after 3years without explanation. First, through your email and your first email, through your email and my first request, it has been launched Love spell to help us get back. Shortly after 48 hours he did his spell, my boyfriend started sending me messages again and I felt horrible for what he just put up. He was then a more important person in his life and he knows it now. We moved in and he was more open to me before he started spending more time with me before. Since the DR JOHN, is mine, my partner is very stable, he is closer to me than before. I recommend DR JOHN, to anyone who needs help. Email: OR or whatsapp him on +2348147766277 . .

  6. Real Voodoo Love Spell That Work Fast With 100% Guarantee Result to Get Your Ex Boyfriend/Girlfriend Back After Breakup/Divorce contact or call/whatsapp him +2348055361568.

    I'm Natasha Wanderly form USA

    Love spell from dr.Unity brought my husband back" After 12years of marriage, me and my husband has been into one quarrel or the other until he finally left me and moved to California to be with another woman. I felt my life was over and my kids thought they would never see their father again. i tried to be strong just for the kids but i could not control the pains that torments my heart, my heart was filled with sorrows and pains because i was really in love with my husband. Every day and night i think of him and always wish he could come back to me, I was really worried and i needed help, so i searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested that Dr Unity can help get ex back fast. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he told me what to do and i did it then he did a Love spell for me. 11hours later, my husband really called me and told me that he miss me and the kids so much, So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me and the kids. Then from that day,our Marriage was now stronger than how it were before, All thanks to Dr Unity. he is so powerful and i decided to share my story on the internet that Dr.Unity is real spell caster who i will always pray to live long to help his children in the time of trouble, if you are here and you need your ex lover back or save your marriage fast. Do not cry anymore, contact this powerful spell caster Dr.Unity now. Here’s his contact,

    Email him at: ,
    Call/WhatsApp him: +2348055361568,
    Check is website: ,
    your kindness will never be forgotten.