FRIDAY: Senator Padilla describes what occurred!

FRIDAY, JUNE 20, 2025

Gutfeld, guests crawl in the gutter: Today, we have nice words to say about some Republican senators. Recent comments by these solons were quoted in a news report by the Washington Post. 

The report discusses Senator Padilla's recent speech in the U.S. Senate—his speech about the way was removed from a press conference, and briefly handcuffed, out in his hometown, L.A.

Four Republican solons were quoted in the Post's report. This is what they said:

What did Sen. Alex Padilla get handcuffed for?

[...]

Over 30 of Padilla’s Democratic colleagues listened intently [to Senator Padilla] as he recounted the questions swirling in his mind during the incident.

“What will my wife think? What will our boys think? And I also remember asking myself: If this aggressive escalation is the result of someone speaking up against the abuses and overreach of the Trump administration, was it really worth it?”

A few Republicans also listened—though they slipped out of the chamber once he finished without addressing him face to face, and not all of them were eager to discuss it afterward.

“You know, he’s a good friend. I just wanted to be supportive,” said Sen. John Boozman (R-Arkansas), boarding one of the underground trolleys.

“Well, he just invited me,” said Sen. James Lankford (R-Oklahoma), before quickly heading back into the chamber.

“I attended a speech. I like Alex Padilla,” said Sen. Thom Tillis (R-North Carolina), as the doors of an elevator outside the chamber closed.

The elevator doors opened back up. Tillis had more to say. He called the treatment Padilla received “absolutely disgusting” while adding that a standard should not be set where senators are comfortable interrupting a high-ranking official’s news conference.

[...]

“The whole encounter just baffled me and didn’t make sense to me,” said Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyoming), “but I do know this. I know a genuinely gentle, kind person when I see one, and I’m a pretty good judge of character. And Alex Padilla is a kind, gentle person.”

Personally, we admire people who are kind, gentle people. We also like people who understand that they're actually praising other people when they describe them that way.

Especially in the current atmosphere, we like people who are willing to say nice things about members of the other party, even when the other person in question is under the partisan tribal gun, as Senator Padilla has been in the past week.

(Below, we'll link you to what happened when they pried the lid off the garbage can on Wednesday evening's Gutfeld! show and the creatures who slithered out devoted a segment to sliming Padilla. Blue elites have uniformly agreed that there's nothing to look at with "cable news" conduct like that.)

"I like Senator Padilla," Senator Tillis said. Senator Padilla "is a kind, gentle person," Senator Lummis said. "He's a good friend," said Senator Boozman.

We think it's good that those people said those things. That said, we continue to be struck by the account Senator Padilla continues to give of what happened that day.

We feel sure that Senator Padilla is a good decent, person. For various reasons, we can imagine that what happened to him that day was deeply embarrassing, possibly deeply upsetting.

That said, Senator Padilla has written a guest essay for the New York Times about what happened that day. Below, you see the way the essay begins:

Senator Padilla: This Is How an Administration Acts When It’s Afraid

Growing up in the northeastern San Fernando Valley of Los Angeles in the 1980s and ’90s, I knew what could happen if you didn’t completely cooperate with law enforcement.

Even so, it was jarring last week when, despite clearly identifying myself as a U.S. senator, I was forcibly removed from a news conference at which Kristi Noem, the secretary of homeland security, promised to “liberate” Los Angeles from our democratically elected mayor and governor. As I was thrown to the ground, handcuffed and taken down a hall while officers refused to tell me why I was being detained, my mind raced with questions.

Where are they taking me? Am I being arrested? What will residents of a city already on edge from being militarized think when they see their senator has just been handcuffed?

What will my wife and our three boys think?

I imagined similar questions were running through the mind of Brad Lander, the New York City comptroller and mayoral candidate, this week when he, too, was handcuffed by federal agents for asking them whether they had a warrant to arrest a migrant he had locked arms with. Like me, Mr. Lander had the audacity to question the legitimacy of federal actions, only to find himself pushed against a wall and detained. 

Simply put, that isn't what happened in that day in L.A. Something is missing from that account of the day's events, as you can surely see.

It's a key tenet of Trumpism: A person must never admit a mistake. A person must never apologize, must never say that he may have been wrong in something he may have done.

Above, you see the solon's account of what happened that day. Except that isn't what happened.

We think he made a mistake that day. (Everyone does at some point, sometimes for obvious reasons.)

It wouldn't have hurt if he'd simply said do. In our view, it could have been a step in the right direction.

Instead, Senator Padilla, a good decent person, continues to give this bowdlerized account of his own behavior that day—in his spots on TV shows, and now in the New York Times.

Anyone can make a mistake. Also, we feel quite sure that Senator Padilla—the agent of an impressive life story—is a thoroughly good, decent person, just like those senators said.

Now for the rest of the story: When Fox News pried the lid off the garbage can, this is what came crawling out. That segment about Senator Padilla's speech was aired this past Wednesday night on the routinely gruesome Gutfeld! program.

We dare you to watch that segment. Garbage of this general type is rolled out on Gutfeld! every night. Blue America's major new orgs don't say a word about this break with broadcast news traditions.

Our journalists refuse to speak. They refuse to perform their role in our flailing and failing society.

That segment is prime time "cable news." It gets even worse on this startling show, but go ahead:

Just watch it.

25 comments:

  1. Realizing Someday don't read no comments, but there is a level of cuteness in the post that makes his point imperceptible. Also too, his summary of events leaves out the most fascist thug part, "his speech about the way was removed from a press conference, and briefly handcuffed." I liked Somerby way more better when dissecting education policies. This is silly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Padilla had the right to speak up at that press briefing. The govt does not have the right to suppress free speech or evade congressional oversight as they did by arresting Padilla without justification.

    Part of this story is that the FBI took Padilla to the briefing, as if this were a setup in order for Noem to flex her muscles by detaining him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He has a right to speak up, but he spoke up at the wrong time. If he’d waited a few minutes instead of interrupting her intro he would have been much more effective.

      I’d have loved to see him get kicked out for his opinions during Q and A. Instead, it was for his immediate interruptions.

      Delete
  3. Ah, yes: nice, gentle person. Good quiet neighbor. That's usually what you hear about serial killers.

    "when, despite clearly identifying myself as a U.S. senator, I was forcibly removed from a news conference"

    Wasn't it recently idiot-Democrat major talking point that No One Is Above the Law? And now, suddenly, identifying oneself as a U.S. senator makes one above the law?

    Good to know. But hey, just a senator? Senator is not above the law. Clearly, the asshole neglected to identify himself as a "Democrat senator". Probably sharp as a tack, like all Democrats.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lucky ducky.
      All I hear is bigots are "economically anxious".

      Delete
    2. First they came for serial killers, but I said nothing, because I'm a bigot, too.

      Delete
    3. The only people who are above the law are J6 rioters. Everyone knows that.

      Delete
    4. He also said he was brought into sex kitten dog and goat killer Noem's conf. by FBI agents. Snuck right in under the radar did he?

      Delete
    5. 12:55 — You imply that Padilla broke the law, but what law, exactly, did he break, in your view?

      Delete
    6. I'm not a lawyer; disorderly conduct?

      That's not the point, though. He seems to be accepting that the law enforcement (or security people?) were acting reasonably, except when he self-identified as a senator they should've backed off immediately . Because he's not just a lowly plebs, a nobody. No, he's a whole SENATOR! Do you know who I am?!! Keep your dirty hands off me, I'm a senator!!!

      Is this okay with you? Then you're a good Democrat.

      Delete
    7. Questioning a public official constitutes the crime of disorderly conduct? Really?

      Delete
    8. I think his point is that if they can manhandle and handcuff a senator for asking questions, they can do it to anybody.

      Delete
    9. He announced his name before they grabbed him, not while he was being handcuffed. He did that because at a press briefing it is customary to identify yourself and state your publication before going on to ask your question. Padilla was doing that.

      The video is widely available on the internet. Take a look at it before making assumptions about what happened.

      Delete
    10. "Questioning a public official constitutes the crime of disorderly conduct? Really?"

      Yes, when questioning is done, as in this this case, while one is conducting oneself disorderly.

      Delete
    11. 2:14 - I think you have the power to bend your perception of reality to fit the requirements of your ideology.

      Delete
    12. Sure, Soros-bot. Whatever brightens your day.

      Delete
  4. “Pakistan formally recommends Trump for 2026 Nobel Peace Prize
    Trump helped secure Pakistan-India ceasefire last month, preventing a broader conflict between the two nuclear states.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There will never be trouble again between India and Pakistan.

      Delete
    2. Donald Trump announced a peace treaty between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, aimed at ending a long-standing conflict marked by violence. The agreement is set to be signed in Washington on June 27, 2025, and is seen as a significant diplomatic achievement for the Trump administration.

      Delete
    3. It was a joke, David.
      All this time, and you still don't get Trump's sense of humor.
      Sad.

      Delete
    4. "While an initial agreement was reportedly signed on June 18, 2025, and a formal signing was planned for the week of June 23, 2025, or June 27, 2025, Rwanda has stated that the agreement will not be signed as scheduled, noting that a signing will only happen when a win-win peace agreement is reached by all parties.

      Trump's claims regarding his role have drawn criticism. The effectiveness of the agreement is uncertain, partly because M23 rebels continue to operate in the region and are not signatories. "

      Delete
  5. Stay on topic David. Quit masturbating.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Food Rations Halved in One of Africa’s Largest Refugee Camps After US AID Cuts"

    Camp residents nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Lickspittle Country Flatters Trump"

    California commenter swoons.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Day One Dawns"

    Peace in Ukraine at last.

    ReplyDelete