THURSDAY, JANUARY 29, 2026
On the New York Times front page: For the second time this week, it seems to us that the New York Times might be headed in a new direction.
In a new, encouraging direction! Online, these headlines sit atop two (2) separate reports which appear on the front page of the paper's print editions:
Nervous Allies and Fox News: How Trump Realized He Had a Big Problem in Minneapolis
Attack on Omar at a Town Hall Followed Years of Trump’s Vitriol
Good lord! There you see the Fox News Channel cited on the Times' front page! That said, we direct you to that other report—to Annie Karni's lengthy report about President Trump's endless attacks on Ilhan Omar.
In our view, Karni's report involves a major act of witness. That said, we also think that the New York Times has at least one more decision to make.
Karni's report comes in response to Tuesday night's assault on Rep. Omar as she spoke at a town hall event in Minneapolis. In yesterday morning's report, we complained about the lack of background information in that initial report.
We acknowledged that we were doing so "reasonably or otherwise.". This morning, on the paper's front page, Karni performs endless witness with respect to Rep. Omar's life—and with respect to President Trump's never-ending unacceptable behavior.
Karni even addresses the ten-year "rumor" about Rep. Omar to which we linked you yesterday. As we told you yesterday, a disordered star on that same Fox News Channel has been endlessly pimping that rumor as part of the garbage and the swill he provides in prime time every night.
A frightening attack was made against Omar on Tuesday night—but who is Ilhan Omar? Before we show you some of what Karni has written, let's turn to the leading authority! You may not know these things:
Ilhan Omar
Ilhan Abdullahi Omar was born in Mogadishu, Somalia, on October 4, 1982, and spent her early years in Baidoa, in southern Somalia. She was the youngest of seven siblings. Her father is Nur Omar Mohamed, an ethnic Somali from the Osman Mohamud sub-clan of Majeerteen, a clan in Northeastern Somalia. He was a colonel in the Somali Army under Siad Barre, and served in the Ogaden War (1977–78). He also worked as a teacher trainer.
Omar's mother, Fadhuma Abukar Haji Hussein, an ethnic Benadiri, died when Omar was two. Omar was raised by her father and grandfather, who were moderate Sunni Muslims opposed to the rigid Wahhabi interpretation of Islam. Her grandfather Abukar was the director of Somalia's National Marine Transport, and some of Omar's uncles and aunts also worked as civil servants and educators. She and her family fled Somalia to escape the Somali Civil War and spent four years in a Dadaab refugee camp in Garissa County, Kenya.
Omar's family secured asylum in the U.S. and arrived in New York in 1995, then lived for a time in Arlington, Virginia, before moving to and settling in Minneapolis, where her father worked first as a taxi driver and later for the post office. Her father and grandfather emphasized the importance of democracy during her upbringing, and at age 14 she accompanied her grandfather to caucus meetings, serving as his interpreter...Omar became a U.S. citizen in 2000 when she was 17 years old.
And so on from there.
We often suggest that you "pity the child." Today, we'll also suggest that you marvel at the child who's able to survive a personal history of this type—though always in an imperfect way—as Rep. Omar has done.
(We might also marvel at the family which helped her survive this ordeal.)
At any rate, that's a bit of background on Rep. Omar's life. Karni covers that personal history in her front-page report. Perhaps more importantly, she also reviews the recent history of President Trump's endless attacks on Omar.
Now for a bit of perspective:
In our view, the New York Times still hasn't addressed the basic question of our time. In our view, the Times has endlessly dodged that basic question. That question goes like this:
What does it mean—what can it possibly mean—when the world's most powerful person behaves in the way he does?
The news division had failed to center that behavior—and that question about that behavior—in its front-page reporting. In our view, the editorial board has persistently slip-slid away from that question, dating all the way back to the four or five years when a badly disordered Citizen Trump kept going on the Fox News Channel to spread false and grossly misleading claims about Barack Obama's place of birth.
In our view, the Times has persistently failed to address the central question of the age. The Times has also dogmatically refused to report and discuss the sorts of things which routinely occur on the highly influential Fox News Channel, our failing nation's most-watched "cable news" channel.
In our view, the Times has refused to bear witness down through these many long years. For today, we were especially thrilled by one part of what Karni reported.
We'll show you what we mean down below. For now, here's the start of Karni's report on the president's endless misconduct:
Attack on Omar at a Town Hall Followed Years of Trump’s Vitriol
As President Trump riled up a rally crowd on Tuesday night describing immigrants bent on harming and killing Americans, he singled out one person in particular as an example of a bad actor.
Foreigners coming into the United States, he told his audience in Iowa, “have to show they can love our country; they have to be proud—not like Ilhan Omar.”
The crowd booed. They recognized the name of the Democratic congresswoman from Minnesota, whom the president has demonized and dehumanized for years with racist and xenophobic attacks, venting that she should “go back” to her country, referring to her as “garbage,” and mocking her hijab by calling it a “little turban.”
In our view, the Times has never centered that sort of behavior in its front-page reporting. In fact, the paper routinely disappears the endless supply of bizarre statements and ugly claims the president routinely posts, in manic fashion, on his extremely strange Truth Social site.
In our view, the New York Times editorial board has never been willing to say that the president's endless behavior is completely unacceptable, full and complete total stop. Needless to say, it has never attempted to consider possible medical explanations for this absurd and yet endless misconduct.
In our view, the Times has never been willing to do those things, dating all the way back to the poisonous birther campaign. Today, though, Karni does an excellent job reporting the possible background to Tuesday's attack—reporting the president's conduct.
Three cheers for Karni and three more for her editors! Regarding the president's endless misconduct, the scribe bears such witness as this:
[I]t was difficult to see 'Tuesday's] attack as unrelated to Mr. Trump’s years of insults and slurs that for years have placed a target on Ms. Omar’s back.
At a recent cabinet meeting, the president referred to Ms. Omar as “garbage.” At a December rally in Pennsylvania, he complained that Ms. Omar “does nothing but bitch.”
He added: “Why is it we only take people from shithole countries?”
[...]
At the same time, Mr. Trump has targeted Somalis in general, saying, “I don’t want them in our country,” a refrain he began using during his first term when he would often whip up his rally crowds to cheer and chant for Ms. Omar to be sent back to the country where she came from.
We've omitted a paragraph concerning a financial attack the president recently lodged against Omar. It seems to us that Karni could have done a better job describing the sprawling problems with that attack.
That same baldly distorted financial attack is a never-ending staple of the ubiquitous agitprop now heard on the Fox News Channel. This afternoon, we'll post the paragraph we've omitted as part of a separate report.
We'll review that claim this afternoon. In the passage shown below, Karni reported the most recent example of ludicrous misconduct by President Trump with respect to Rep. Omar:
He has raged against [Omar] using violent language of the sort that can motivate extremists and provoke assaults such as the one that unfolded on Tuesday.
“Ilhan’s toughness in the face of a bully and in the face of threats is what pisses off people like Donald Trump,” Representative Greg Casar, Democrat of Texas, said in an interview on Wednesday.
Her response was so stoic that her political adversaries online used it to back up their conspiracy theory that the attack had been staged, a charge that Mr. Trump quickly leveled.
Ms. Omar “probably had herself sprayed, knowing her,” he told ABC News.
She probably staged the attack, the astonishing president said. In our view, the New York Times has never attempted to come to terms with the stunning disorder put on display by the president's trademark behavior.
On the whole, Karni did an excellent job reporting the sitting president's endless bizarre misconduct. We thought that part of her report was quite good—but we were thrilled to see her comes to terms, quite directly, with one ubiquitous part of the MAGA world's rumor mill:
For years, Mr. Trump has also helped spread the baseless conspiracy theory that she was married to her brother and residing in the United States illegally.
“She should get the hell out,” Mr. Trump said at his December rally in Pennsylvania. “Throw her the hell out! She does nothing but complain.”
The crowd responded by chanting: “Send her back! Send her back!”
That was inexcusable conduct as the president whipped up a crowd. Meanwhile, good for Karni and good for her editors! We refer to the way they dealt with that "baseless conspiracy theory."
In yesterday's report, we linked you to several fact-checks of that ten-year-old "rumor" and claim. Today, Karni and the New York Times simply dismiss it as "baseless."
News orgs often avoid discussing claims like that for fearing of spreading them further. Given the frequency with which this claim is made within MAGA world, we think the Times took the better course today.
Meanwhile, if the Times had covered the Fox News Channel down through the years, the paper would have reported the fact that Greg Gutfeld persistently pimps that ten-year-old "rumor" on his gruesome prime time program.
Yesterday, we linked you to the January 15 Gutfeld! program, in which this very strange "cable news" star, backed by a hapless quartet of hand-picked stooges, pretended that everyone agrees that this story is true but agrees not to talk about it.
Gutfeld pimps this claim on a routine basis, cheered on by the corporate owners who pay him $9 million per year for the messaging service he renders.
In such ways, the nation's most-watched (by far) cable news channel spreads its corporate messaging across the fruited plain. In our view, the Times has never been willing to bear witness to this influential behavior—has never been willing to report and discuss what happens on this "cable news" channel.
On Tuesday, we linked to a surprising news report in which the Times described some recent conduct on the Fox News Channel. This morning, Fox News is named again, this time in the most prominent headline on the print edition's front page.
In our view, the Times has been withholding this sort of reporting over the course of the many long years. The Times would be providing a journalistic service—will be creating a type of "new morning"—if it sets its fears aside and engages in straightforward reporting about this largely ridiculous imitation of a news channel.
In short, it's time to come to terms with president's astounding misconduct. Beyond that, it's time to stop pretending that the Fox News Channel doesn't exist.
Full disclosure! Some of the work on the Fox News Channel has been more accurate than the corresponding work from Blue America's news orgs.
Blue America needs to know that. It's time for Blue America's major newspaper to report that reality too.
I'm still not distracted from the Epstein Files being hidden from the public by the Republican Party.
ReplyDeleteYou have to admit, for a few seconds it really did seem like Republican voters were concerned with pedophilia. Even more so, if you think they've ever argued in good faith.
DeleteThey were terrified about the jackbooted thugs of the federal government, until they actually brought genuine jackbooted thugs into existence.
DeleteAs long as the deep state goons are shooting peaceful Democrats in the back, it's all good. Cunts.
DeleteTriggered, Hillary?
DeleteNyet.
Delete
ReplyDelete"...lengthy report about President Trump's endless attacks on Ilhan Omar. "
Whoa, look who is complaining about endless attacks on a national politician? Lol.
Thanks for the laughs, Bob.
Exactly.
DeleteTrump was literally shot at by a Republican voter.
Whatever amount of vitriol Trump expressed toward Omar, it wasn't enough. She's is an outright antisemite. If she were not a black Democrat, she would have been removed from the House on account of her bigotry. Or, at least stripped of committee assignments.
ReplyDeleteShe must have been aware that her constituents were stealing billions of dollars from various welfare programs. Yet, she allowed the theft to cotinine. No doubt some of that stolen money went to her as campaign contributions.
Of course any attack is frightening when it happens, when people don't know what's going on. We now know that she was sprayed with a small amount of apple cider vinegar. Thank goodness it wasn't more serious.
Can David name the 5 constitution amendments ICE is violating in Mnnpls? (Minimum)
DeleteOr just go fuck yourself fuck face troll.
DeleteComing from a Zionist that once insisted on this board that it was antisemitic to not support Netanyahu . Hahahahaha.
DeleteGo take a flying fuck, dickhead in cal, you fucking fascist freak. How much further up orange Mussolini's ass are you going to crawl,, fuckface.
DeleteAlso too you lie. Omar rightly condemns the fascist criminal warmonger Bibi, not Jews. And you fucking assholes made her apologize for being correct. And again, when you have nothing, you cunts blame the victim.
DeleteYou must be aware that Trump has pardoned over 1500 crooks and over 1.3 billion dollars in white collar theft, and you don't give a shit.
Delete“ If she were not a black Democrat, she would have been removed from the House on account of her bigotry.”
DeletePlease name a Republican who was removed for “bigotry.”
“ she allowed the theft to cotinine.”
It was discovered and prosecuted.
Omar’s winning percentage in her most recent House race was 74%.
She has spoken against the Israeli government and the influence of AIPAC in US politics. Not sure that makes her anti-Semitic
Must have done - the investigation started in 2022 you fucking lying POS. You think after three years if that was a "Must have don"e charges would have dropped on Omar you fucking bigoted cunt?
DeleteTriggered, Hillary?
DeleteShe has also been a harsh critic of Saudi Arabia. Does that make her anti-Islam, David?
DeleteThere is ample evidence that Trump is a bigot. Birds of a feather.
Delete"She must have been aware that her constituents were stealing billions of dollars from various welfare programs."
DeleteShe must have been. Or else your entire belief system is a fraud.
“ Whatever amount of vitriol Trump expressed toward Omar, it wasn't enough. ”
DeleteWhat would have been “enough”, DiC? A couple of Republican politicians called for her execution a while back. Maybe you think Trump should have done that this time?
"If she were not a black ...." Racist much? In poker, this is known as a "tell."
Delete
DeleteTo a Democrat retard everything is a "tell".
Do "tell" you cunt.
DeleteThe MN fraud involved about $250 million (the claims of billions come from unhinged people in the Trump admin and they have presented no evidence to support their claims) and it was thought up and implemented by the mastermind and ringleader of the fraud - Aimee Bock, an American White Christian woman, who founded and operated the organization that conducted the fraud.
DeleteThe fraud was discovered by the Walz admin which passed it on to the Feds, and it was then prosecuted by the Biden admin.
That's not what my media feed says so u r a liar. Kimmel played a clip of Fox, Newsmax, et al talking heads shitting all over Pretti. You see the idiots here parrot the blame the victim bs. It's what fascist pigs do when they got nothing but their criming.
DeleteThat's not what my media feed says so u r a liar. Kimmel played a clip of Fox, Newsmax, et al talking heads shitting all over Pretti. You see the idiots here parrot the blame the victim bs. It's what fascist pigs do when they got nothing but their criming.
DeletePretti was a deranged violent agitator looking to be a hero to the fellow deranged by finding an opportunity for shooting an ICE officer.
DeleteBefore the new video I thought he might have been reaching for his gun to show it to the agents who were yelling "gun" and it was an unfortunate accident.
As it turns out he was the perpetrator and victim of his own death.
1:55 everybody views you as deranged, not Pretti. You got confused I guess.
Delete
ReplyDeleteWhoa, this whole post is about Madam Omar? Because she was sprinkled with holy water or something?
Seriously? Not surviving an assassination attempt after a decade of being pursued by all idiot-Democrat media and all of the "Intelligence Community" (what is it, 17 government agencies? Remind us, Hillary.)?
No, I repeat, not surviving an assassination attempt, but just being sprinkled? Are you completely dumb, Bob? Brain-dead?
Oh, whatever. Never mind, keep on going, and thanks for the laughs.
Jagoff.
DeleteUnlike the maga pussy, when attacked, Omar goes after the cunt and rears back to punch his ugly fat magat face. Omar is a fucking badass, not a magat pussy.
DeleteShe has been physically attacked and subjected to death threats and hate speech longer than Trump has been a politician.
DeleteTriggered, Hillary?
Delete11:08: it’s actually 10:45, 10:31, and 10:41, who seem oddly triggered by Somerby’s post.
Delete
DeleteNeither one of them is affected by tourette, Hillary. You're the only one here who is.
No more Tourette’s than the commenter spouting “idiot democrat” and “brain dead” whenever Somerby writes a column they (or you?) dislike, 11:23.
DeleteThere's nothing obscene about wondering if a poster might be brain-dead, Hillary. Especially this particular poster, who routinely characterizes people as being mad or insane.
DeleteSame goes for Democrats being idiots. 'cause they are. It's an undeniable fact. No one but a complete idiot would seriously entertain the concept of women trapped in men's bodies. Or that being a homo is perfectly normal. Can we agree on that?
Nyet.
DeleteObscenity is not a requirement of Tourette’s. It can also be a repetition of words, such as “idiot” or “soros”.
DeleteObscenity is a requirement of me asking if you've been triggered, retard.
DeleteTriggered, 12:47? Get help.
DeleteNyet.
Delete
DeleteThanks, but I own you retards without any help.
Nyet.
DeleteThe gist of Bob's posts on this matter, that Fox is a propaganda outlet and the its conduct has been largely ignored , is true. For years, Jon Stewart was the only consistently accurate public commenter on this.
ReplyDeleteYes, but somerby also claims, without evidence, that Fox says accurate things that blue America ignores.
DeleteYes
Delete11:11 - Fox said accurate things such as, for example, that during Biden’s term there was a major surge of illegal immigration, and such as that Biden was suffering a cognitive decline during his term. We Blues were spooked and surprised when these claims became the defining issues of the 2024 election.
DeleteI don’t recall Somerby actually analyzing the way Fox covered those things, because, being primarily a propaganda outlet, their coverage of any issue has to be suspect.
Delete" ... during Biden’s term there was a major surge of illegal immigration ...."
DeleteFox didn't mention that fact that Biden and the Dems tried to promote a bipartisan bill to address the so-called "border crisis" in 2023 but Trump told the GOP senators not to pass it because it would harm his chances for winning the 2024 election.
Integrity-wise, there's no such thing as a half-truth.
You can’t possibly be suggesting that Somerby is vouching for Fox’s integrity, right? His view is that Fox is a garbage can of corporate propaganda.
DeletePresidents don't need any special bills to uphold the law.
DeleteNever heard Fox talk about the billions Biden pumped into law enforcement for Trump to take all the credit for Biden's reduction in crime.
DeleteCorbert, Kimmel, Meyers all do a great job on shining a light on Trumpian fascism and corruption. Way better than the useless cowered media. Sure criminal charges are coming for saying bad things about the fucked up regime.
Deleteboomers think Colbert and Kimmel are funny
Delete
DeleteMeh. No one think they are funny. When retarded cat-ladies say they are, that's virtue signaling.
Colbert and Kimmel think fascists are cunts.
DeletePresidents don't need any special bills to uphold the law.
DeleteReally, fuckface?
So I guess we can dispense with the grotesque budget King Orange Chickenshit is demanding for his personal army of nazis running around beating the shit out of American citizens?
Don't call the fascists fascists or else they will fuck you up, unconstitutionally of course.
Delete"Reports from the Twin Cities show that the reprisals can sometimes be petty, but no less unconstitutional. One woman who followed a CBP vehicle in her car was stopped by an officer who warned that he was using facial recognition software and knew who she was. Three days later, the Department of Homeland Security revoked the woman’s Global Entry and TSA PreCheck. The government cannot revoke a privilege as punishment for exercising First Amendment rights. A local toy store says DHS initiated an audit of employment and payroll records mere hours after the owner’s daughter criticized ICE to the media. (DHS denies that the investigation of a store with just five part-time employees is tied to her critical comments.)"
Somerby thinks Fox is accurate when it says something that supports his own views. Somerby has his own prejudices.
DeleteFor most of us, agreeing with Fox would be a red flag and inspire us to more closely examine our beliefs. For Somerby, when he agrees with Fox, he believes it is because Fox is miraculously accurate and we blues need to acknowledge that. No self examination for Somerby.
Immigration has been used as a wedge issue by Republicans for decades. It likely motivates some of their base but otherwise does not significantly move the needle.
DeleteIn 2024 it was not a top priority for voters, according to the data, and it was even less of a priority than average.
Fox News has been widely viewed as producing Republican propaganda since its inception, and has been widely covered in media since then as well. Jon Stewart had no special insight into Fox News, that is just laughable. Fox News has been heavily covered in media, Bob's perspective is not tenable.
As a Dem, I don't find Jon Stewart funny or even amusing, and him trying to claim some mantle as a public intellectual is eye rolling.
I also don't find Colbert particularly interesting, but he offers a much better, coherent push back against Republicans than Stewart's efforts, which clearly are more about self aggrandizement in Stewart's case.
The "surge" of immigration started under Trump, due to his disastrous foreign policies. Then there was pent up demand when immigration was halted due to Covid.
So Biden had to deal with Trump's mess on immigration and he got to it right away. By the end of Biden's term his policies had shrunk immigration to a relative low.
Notably Biden took a different approach to immigration, focusing more on root causes than brute enforcement and deportation, and it was highly successful.
Historically, Republicans have recognized that immigrants are vital to our society and have supported immigration, including those seeking asylum and those that are undocumented in our country.
A shift occurred with W Bush who went after immigrants more harshly but it wasn't a full-throated effort. Trump then went all in with cruelty and brutality, which isn't an effective way of dealing with immigration, but it may be effective towards his authoritarian goals, although it seems to be petering out, crushed by its own weight.
Well said 1:31.
DeleteI stopped watching Stewart when he thought it fun to diss Hillary. At the time, I too thought she was going to win, but I didn't find his misogyny funny. In retrospect, Hillary bashing probably contributed to her loss to Trump, although nothing may have mattered in the face of Russian meddling and vote suppression in the Blue Wall states.
DeleteSomerby was fully on board with the Hillary bashing in 2016 and he bashed Harris himself, echoing press complaints that she didn't give enough interviews and sucked at border control and so on. Somerby participated whole heartedly in the "Biden is too old" campaign run by Fox and the NY Times, pushing him off the ticket. You can't do that stuff and claim to be "blue" when Trump was the opponent and had already been elected once. It was too important to makes sure Democrats won, but Somerby attacked Harris anyway, in unfair ways, such as saying she lied about the gender pay gap and was a "hoe" in her private life.
Somerby can't come back around now and claim to be part of Blue America after helping Trump get reelected.
Their Hero Ronnie Raygun flat out granted citizenship to millions of illegals. Just proves Somerby's point how all these retards have had their brains messaged by the mighty right wing wurlitzer.
DeleteTheir Hero Ronnie Raygun flat out granted citizenship to millions of illegals. Just proves Somerby's point how all these retards have had their brains messaged by the mighty right wing wurlitzer.
DeleteIn case you haven't been paying attention, Somerby thinks the immigrants should be deported and he believes they are criminals. He has repeated some of the atrocity stories maligning immigrants here himself. And he believes all the lies about Biden's immigration policy and Harris's participation in stemming the influx using prevention in the donor countries. Somerby's beliefs about immigration are closely similar to a lot of Fox viewers. And those aren't his only righty views. He supported book banning in schools and libraries. He thinks desegregation is a bad policy in school (despite evidence to the contrary). He thinks anti-racist programs are bad because people resent them, and because there is no real racism worth complaining about any more. He thinks there is no gender pay gap -- Hillary and Harris both lied about it. That's a sample of the ideas he held before Fox, but that convince him that Fox has some good facts sometimes. He thought Fox had better facts during the whole Trayvon Martin deserved to be shot argument. He thought the Ferguson shooting was righteous. He is A-OK with blame-the-victim. But Roy Moore did nothing wrong because Bogey and Bacall were smiled upon by fans, and because the mamas thought Moore as "a catch" even though he tried to rape 14 year olds and was caught stalking young teens at the mall. Like most pedos, he objected to calling a man who lusts after young teens a pedophile. Their lust is different and deserves a less familiar word, Somerby argued. And he never talks about Epstein although he loves to quote from My Antonia, a book also recommended to Epstein by his best buddies.
Delete3:23 - Is it possible that every single sentence you write is false? Let's take your first assertion: "Somerby thinks the imigrants should be deported." And let's clarify: Do you mean all immigrants or illegal immigrants? Either way, can you back up your assertion? Or should we just take your word for it because you're a rando anon?
DeleteThe problem with Hillary Clinton is the only reason she got as far she did in politics was that she married into it.
DeleteNot very admirable.
I report, you decide.
Delete2:32 - "Somerby was fully on board with the Hillary bashing in 2016"
Somerby, 7/22/16:
"Matthews is simply a fraudster.
Why are we calling so many names? Because Matthews was a lunatic Hillary-hater during the period in question! And because he expressed exactly the types of complaints about the horrible, know-it-all Clinton he now ascribed to Republicans. Briefly, let's review:
In December 1999, Clinton announced that she would run for the Senate. She would oppose Rudy Giuliani, one of Matthews' most manly of men.
As the race began to take shape, Matthews engaged in viral, unfettered, undisguised, lunatic Hillary-hatred. It took some of the very forms he now seems to wonder about.
We've recorded the facts many times. But due to the press corps' ironclad code of silence, it never creates a wider discussion about the way this decades-long con game has worked."
DG, Somerby has said that the Democrats lost the election because we as a party hold a position sympathetic to immigrants and because we did not take a hard line about deporting them the way Trump did. He then misrepresented the efforts of Biden/Harris to control the border and repeated right wing propaganda about Democrats wanting an open border (and Biden opening the border). He also discussed the killing of the nursing student in Athens GA (Laken Riley) and agreed that she wouldn't have been killed if the migrant hadn't been admitted to the US. He said we blues weren't paying attention to such legitimate concerns about migrant crime. (The killer was a legal migrant admitted during Trump's first term under his program for Venezuelans, shipped to NYC by Abbott then drifting to GA seeking work.) You can't eliminate the potential for a legal migrant to commit a future crime in the US without shutting down immigration completely.
DeleteFollowing is a quote of what Somerby said after Biden's State of the Union speech:
"That passage addresses a claim we've seen no one make. Here are the claims which have been widely made by red tribe observers, even on such clownish programs as The Five:
Familiar claims on red tribe TV shows:
For the bulk of his first three years, President Biden made no serious effort to stop the rapidly increasing flow of unauthorized immigrants across the southern border. As a result, an untold number of violent people were presumably able to cross the border along with everyone else.
It was one of those violent people who is alleged to have murdered Laken Riley. For three years, the Biden Admin made no serious effort to staunch the flow across the border, even as they kept insisting that the border was secure and closed.
It seems to us that red tribe pundits are raising perfectly valid points when they make such arguments. Until big city mayor began to complain, it seems to us that the Biden administration had been weirdly silent about the vast increase in chaos at the southern border.
As part of this package, a very large number of unvetted people have been allowed to stay in the country over the past several years. One of those people was Jose Ibarra, who has been accused of the murder of Laken Riley.
In the wake of this highly publicized murder, remarkably clueless blue tribe pundits have laughed about the silly voters who see the border as a major issue. In one case, a major figure at MSNBC seemed to be unaware of the most elementary facts about the killing of Riley. "
DG, the context of Somerby's complaint about the way Matthews treated HIllary was to bash feminists for not defending Hillary from Matthews. Even though feminists did complain about Matthews and his misogyny. This is partly a case of Somerby not reading what feminists write in the places where they are published. If Somerby doesn't see it in the NY Times, then feminists didn't say it and he goes off on a rant about how feminists didn't even defend Hillary, implying that others cannot be held accountable if feminists themselves didn't defend a female candidate.
DeleteThe date for the immigration quote is:
SATURDAY, MARCH 9, 2024
My point about your quote is that Somerby was not defending Hillary from Matthews but attacking feminists and showing that no one defended Hillary, so he is off the hook for not supporting her candidacy.
When Hillary accused Trump of stalking her around the debate stage by moving up behind her and appearing in her screen shot (instead of returning to his own podium while she answered a question), Somerby defend Trump and objected to Hillary's complaint. That is participating in Hillary bashing, since the right was saying that she was too much of a snowflake when she complained about him upstaging her.
DeleteTrump does know enough about TV performing to manipulate his presence to undermine her on stage. Somerby defended Trump.
Somerby routinely took the anti-Hillary position on various controversies (such as when she brought her own salsa into a restaurant, or when she made a joke about being likeable) and later summed it up by calling her a horrible candidate. That isn't how you support a nominee if you want them to win. That is the Hillary-bashing (by the press, of the kind Somerby used to complain about when it was done to Al Gore) I was referring to, not his criticism of feminists for not objecting to Matthews misogyny. It does seem obvious that Somerby only recognizes blatant misogyny but not the more subtle kind, such as his own suggestion that Chanel Miller shouldn't have gotten drunk if she didn't want to be raped, and his complaint that the press didn't report how much she'd had to drink when she was assaulted by Brock Turner (whose conviction Somerby was criticizing). It is sexist to hold a double standard in which a victim is blamed for her own rape if she doesn't follow a different set of rules than apply to men. Somerby limits his recognition of misogyny to Gutfeld-style fat jokes and not to things like the gender gap in pay between men and women, another form of misogyny in which women are restricted to home and paid less when they seek employment, reserving better jobs for men and applying different standards to working women. Somerby never got that issue either.
Typical Gish Gallop response. The point is simple: You say "Somerby thinks the immigrants should be deported." You don't back up that statement that all immigrants should be deported. Instead, you say that Somerby agrees with Fox that "a large number of unvetted people have been allowed to stay in the country." That seems to be a perfectly true statement -- there was a remarkable surge in illegal immigration during Biden's term -- and it supports Somerby's consistent claim that Fox, a garbage-can propaganda show, sometimes makes true claims that Blue tribes do not hear.
DeleteShock Change in Ice Policy!
ReplyDelete"Homan says Minneapolis operation will be ‘by the book’"
Yeah, but which book?
DeleteMein Kampf or 1984?
DeleteThe newly-minted "Bag of Cash" Homan's strawman: the Minnesota ICE operation hasn't been perfect.
DeleteMainstream media interpretation: Trump's backing down.
If you believe any of Woman's shit I got a bridge...
DeleteWeirdo.
DeleteWe still do not know if Homan returned the cash to the FBI or kept it.
DeleteWe don't even know if Homan is human, since he can barely speak English, he may be from another planet.
I mean that face, oof. C'mon, man.
He is another one of them alien lizard people, fo sur.
Delete"President Trump's never-ending unacceptable behavior."
ReplyDeleteNever-ending unacceptable sugarcoating.
Construction is down across all sectors except for infrastructure, which is primarily due to Biden's infrastructure policies (for which Trump will try to take credit for).
ReplyDeleteManufacturing construction is down.
Manufacturing jobs are down.
Construction is all in on AI data center power plants. This crash is gonna really be sucky.
DeleteTools like tariffs and AI can be highly useful to our society, but only if used in smart ways and at the right time; currently they are being used by people who are perhaps morons, but more importantly are only interested in helping themselves and not the country or its people.
DeleteStephen Colbert: “Do not compare ICE or Border Patrol agents to the Nazis. That’s an unfair comparison. The Nazis were willing to show their faces.”
ReplyDeleteI thought Nazis were worse than yelling and pushing and only shooting in self defense. Colbert's comment supports those who say the brutality of Nazis is overstated.
We have been terribly misinformed by the public school system.
Lucky for you you were home schooled like a regular Taliban boy. Nazi bitch.
DeleteColbert made a joke. He is also implying that the ICE agents who summarily executed two protesters were like Nazis, who shot people in cold blood. It is ludicrous to suggest Nazis shot people in self defense, just as it is clear ICE were not acting in self defense either, but attempting to suppress resistance.
DeleteTrump is busy removing displays from museums that he disagrees with. He will begin whitewashing the Nazis after he has removed all the slavery historical info.
Liberals think law enforcement self-defense is the same as Nazi genocide.They're stupid and pliant so Colbert helps them internalize that Nazis were only as bad as normal American law enforcement officials bravely doing their jobs.
DeleteNazis did two things. They subjugated and oppressed the German people and the residents of occupied nations invaded by Hitler, and they also committed genocide against groups of people they targeted (Jews, Roma, homosexuals, disabled people, communists and socialists, political opponents). They murdered dissidents and clergy who opposed them AND they committed genocide.
DeleteLiberals do not consider ICE to be law enforcement (police). Border and immigration control is a different function than law enforcement. ICE is not trained to do law enforcement and they are not authorized to do it. Conflating ICE with law enforcement smears the police, who largely have ways to avoid shooting innocent people. They are not allowed to shoot people running away from them, for example, and they do not throw gas grenades into cars full of children, the way ICE has been doing.
Colbert did not compare law enforcement to Nazis. He compared ICE to them. No one thinks ICE is bravely doing anything. We think of them as bullies and cowards using a uniform as an excuse to brutalize people, much as the Nazis did.
Trump's dad, who was abusive to Trump and got so fed up with his own son that he sent him off to live at a military school at a very young age, not only supported the KKK but also the German American Bund (a Nazi organization in America).
DeleteMany prominent Americans supported the Nazis, from Father Coughlin to Charles Lindbergh to Henry Ford to Prescott Bush (from whom descended two American presidents), and many American corporations also supported the Nazis.
It has always been there, Trump is just someone with enough gall, temerity, and hubris to tap into it.
There is some evidence that Trump has a learning disability that prevented him from doing well in early schooling. He had tutors but he hit them (according to biographers) so he was sent to a more structured and disciplined private school (military academy) to graduate so that he could enter college. At the college level, he paid others to take tests for him and his father bought his way into grad school. It is unclear whether it was abusive to send Trump to military school or a last-ditch effort to help him become literate (which has obviously failed by all accounts).
DeleteLook at the Nazi simps making excuses about Colbert to make sure he can "pass" so that he can keep promoting Nazis as benign. An old propaganda trick.
DeleteThe left knows that post boomer generations Z and alpha have no historic memory or attachment to WW ll era and are not responsive to "Nazi" which makes them easy to reeducate with a softer take. Gaza played into this too. Colbert helps the process along.
Delete2:00 All intelligent and decent people think ICE are brave and decent people doing an essential job for the safety and welfare of the American people. We stand by them against the terroristic leftists attacking them in the streets and trying to protect illegal rapists and murderers.
DeleteNo one who is normal views them according to your distorted and deranged point of view.
Colbert’s joke is offensive. It minimizes the slaughter of 6 million Jews, Gypsies, and other civilians. It turns this horror into something funny.
Deletepost boomer generations watch movies just like anyone else does
DeleteColbert said you know how awful Nazis are, ICE is worse, Capeesh retards?
Delete
DeleteIs anyone still watching all that "late night" shit? I bet no one does.
Even Bob, who is a true-blue Democrat cult follower, switched to FoxNews, long time ago.
Yes, I remember when he said he watches Fox 24/7 like other Fox viewers -- yes, he really said that. It is why he doesn't know anything about actual current events any more, and why he thinks Fox has the best facts. That is what Fox does to someone.
DeleteSomerby and the NY Times commiserating over their shared buyer's remorse for Trump is really sweet in the context of Valentine's Day coming soon.
ReplyDeleteAgree.
DeleteYour theory : Somerby promoted Trump before the election, but now is sorry.
ReplyDeleteMy theory: Somerby never promoted Trump, and you’re just rationalizing instead of admitting you were wrong all along.
My theory: Somerby is a groyper bro who supports white supremacy and misogyny. He thinks Trump will deliver on Nazi goals (Project 2025 via Miller) but only supports Trump because he has power, not because he likes him. He is a good foot soldier, promoting the daily right wing talking points. He blames all victims.
DeleteDG, Somerby promoted Trump by attacking Democratic candidates and people expressing anti-Trump views during elections. He kept urging blue America to try to understand the views of Trump supporters, said they were being maligned by the left.
DeleteDG is just a Somerby simp, a troll not worth responding to.
DeleteToday, Somerby makes a remark about the NY Times not repeating the rumors about Omar in order to avoid spreading them. This shows that he understands the concern that repeating Gutfeld's slurs here about the women on the View and others would be advancing right wing propaganda. If Somerby gets that point, why does he keep spreading the filth, instead of just characterizing it and moving on? There has never been a good reason for Somerby to keep repeating Gutfeld's hate, day after day.
ReplyDeleteSpot on. Good catch.
DeleteDo yourself a favor and watch clips of Trump at his press conference with Rubio and Hegseth holding forth on some in the press saying he closed his eyes during his previous, three hour press conference.
ReplyDeleteThe whole room couldn't stop laughing at his lighthearted jokes and mischief. The man is a treasure.
I forget -- was Trump elected as comedian in chief? Are they laughing at him or with him? It matters.
DeleteSomerby pretends he wants mainstream media to attack Fox, but doing so would make them seem partisan and self-serving, since Fox is their competition.
ReplyDeleteSomerby himself is an eager promoter of Gutfeld's show, and occasionally Watters. Yes, he calls Gutfeld a bad boy, but he also repeats his jokes and repeatedly points out that his is the #1 cable network and a highly rated show. In contrast, I don't think I've ever seen Somerby repeat a Colbert joke here, much less daily.
If the mainstream media were to highlight Fox's activities spreading propaganda, how would that change Fox viewership? Are there regular Fox viewers who don't know that Fox presents the conservative view? Would any of them switch because they found that out, or is that why they choose Fox? Are there any Independents or liberals watching Fox who don't know they spread propaganda? How many?
DeleteIt seems to me that not only is Somerby beating a very dead horse, but he has no clear view of what would be accomplished if the NY Times wasted space telling people that Fox is conservative. Duh!
Anne Karni is a reporter who collected facts from other sources and wrote an article. She is not a "witness" to anything about Omar. A witness is first hand, on the spot, someone who observed Omar, not wrote about her in a research assignment.
ReplyDeleteIt is annoying when Somerby uses rhetorical devices that don't work. Good and Pretti were witnesses to ICE abuses and they died because they were on the spot observers, who ICE targeted for their service to their community. Karni wrote a story. She gets tagged as a witness in Somerby's book because she lives in his second-hand world in which he never deals with anything straight on, never discusses real issues, never has the courage to take a stand on anything. That is Somerby's idea of a witness and it stinks.
The most important thing is press coverage, not what happened to Ilhan Omar, amirite?
ReplyDeleteHere is Tiedrich's take on the incident:
"Just spoke to Pres. Trump. I asked him if he had seen the video of Rep. Omar being attacked and sprayed by a substance.
“No. I don’t think about her. I think she’s a fraud. I really don’t think about that. She probably had herself sprayed, knowing her,” the president said.
I asked again if he had seen the video.
“I haven’t seen it. No, no. I hope I don't have to bother.”
and just like that, Donny Convict continues his 79-year-long unbroken streak of being the worst fucking person on the planet.
this fucking guy. he admits he hasn’t seen — and doesn’t want to see — the video of the assault, but that doesn’t keep him from running his ignorant mouth about it.
he thinks the attack on Rep. Omar is a hoax, because of course he does. Donny hates Omar — because he’s a fucking racist — and, because he doesn’t have a single ounce of decency in his rotting body, he can’t even mumble some halfhearted third-grade-level statement about ‘bad. so bad. we’re all wishing her well.’
what kind festering cum-sock hears about a woman being sprayed with some noxious liquid and goes ‘oh yeah, I’ll bet she did it to herself.’ who the fuck even thinks like that?
you know what? I’ll bet by crying ‘hoax!’, Donny’s telling on himself again — because with as always with this shithead, every accusation is a confession.
look, I don’t want to be a conspiracy guy. it’s really not my thing. but for the life of me, I’m still trying to figure out how Donny’s blown-to-bits ear magically regenerated itself."
Tampon on the Don's ear helped speed the recovery. Praise Jesus. Thank God that no good fireman was splattered instead of the Don.
DeleteIf video has made us all witnesses to these incidents, Trump doesn't want to see it because that would interfere with the lies he tells, just as all those witness videos interfered with the narrative fronted by everyone in the Trump administration, from the top on down to Fox minions and social media assholes (like the trolls here today).
DeleteSomerby doesn't want to be a witness either, so he doesn't talk about the murders, much less the videos. It might stifle his real job, promoting Fox and right wing talking points by advancing Fox memes. I'm not a conspiracy guy either but the stuff Somerby chooses to talk about is so far different than anyone else in the lefty blogosphere that there is no way in hell Somerby is part of blue America. Where is his outrage? What did the actual witnesses actually record with their cell phones on the streets in Minneapolis? You could never know by reading Somerby because he doesn't care. Too busy promoting Fox.