SONG(S) SUNG BLUE: O'Donnell wins the Pulitzer Prize!

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2026

Also, the president's Waterloo: Last evening, starting at 10 o'clock, Lawrence O'Donnel spent an hour winning the Pulitzer Prize.

We refer to the Pulitzer Prize for Not Being Asleep at The Wheel While Being Powder Blue. Before we describe O'Donnell's performance, let's return to one of the columns which appeared, over the weekend, at the New York Times.

As we noted in Monday's report, we thought we heard a familiar song as we read a few of those columns. In one column, Jamelle Bouie seemed to be dreaming a pleasant dream about a certain president's recent drop in the polls.

"Minneapolis May Be Trump’s Gettysburg," the headline on the column said. The president's current decline may be his Gettysburgperhaps even his Waterloo!

We thought we heard a familiar old song sung Blue. We thought we possibly heard that same song in the new column by Ezra Klein.

"Trump Has Overwhelmed Himself," the headline said on that column

At this site, we recalled the way Candidate Trump had supposedly doomed himself with what he said about John McCain! Also, we recalled the way he had doomed himself with what he said to Billy Bush on that Access Hollywood videotape!

We Blues! We've been singing that song of easy escape since at least 2015. As we read those two columnseven as we read this guest essay by Ruth Ben-Ghiatwe thought we might be hearing the newest version of that same old tribal song.

(At one point, we even flashed on On The Beach, the four major stars 1959 film about the last few months of human life after a nuclear war. That's the danger we apparently saw in the revival of that pleasing old song.)

Will reaction to the fatal shooting of Michael Pretti prove to be the downfall of the sitting president? Everything is possible! 

Without question, that decline could point the way to victory by Democrats in this year's congressional elections. But what happens after that?

Before we consider O'Donnell's performance, let's turn to several striking comments in the three columns we've mentioned. We'll start with the column by Bouie, in which he offers this portrait of MAGA defeat:

Minneapolis May Be Trump’s Gettysburg

[...]

The result was a catastrophic defeat for the Confederacy. Lee lost the initiative and would spend the rest of the war fighting on the defensive, unable to wage another strategic campaign. The Confederacy would not win foreign recognition, leaving it helpless against a Union blockade. And even with the tremendous loss of life—the Union Army suffered more than 23,000 casualties over three days of battle—the Northern public would be reinvigorated by victory, ready to continue the fight.

ICE and C.B.P. still roam the streets, and Trump’s authoritarian aspirations have not dimmed. But surveying the wreckage of Operation Metro Surge—of this reactionary administration’s crushing defeat at the hands of another band of tenacious Northerners—it does look to me like MAGA’s Gettysburg.

Everything is possible (at least until it isn't)! That said, that sounds a bit like wishful thinking. We almost thought we heard the lilt of a very old tribal song.

Full disclosure!  Assuming our scheduled elections take place this fall, MAGA may well get crushedbut President Trump will remain in the Oval Office! And in her balanced, academic presentation, Professor Ben-Ghiat makes a significant claim:

History Shows Trump’s Worst Impulses May Backfire on Him

[...]

“I follow my instincts, and I am never wrong,” said the Italian Fascist dictator Mussolini, shortly before he invaded Ethiopia in 1935. That war and Italy’s ensuing occupation initially made him popular at home, further inflating his ego, but eventually contributed to the bankruptcy of the Italian state.

[...]

It is well documented that strongmen are at their most dangerous when they feel threatened. That is why, as popular discontent with the Trump administration’s actions deepens, Americans should brace for heightened militarized domestic repression and more imperialist aggression abroad.

"I am never wrong," Mussolini said. President Trump makes similar statements pretty much every day of the week.

Could a type of (clinically diagnosable) delusion be present when he makes such grandiose claims? We can't answer that question, but Ben-Ghiat makes a claim which we ourselves have suggested in the past:

Strongmen are at their most dangerous when they feel threatened!

If MAGA does get mauled this November, how might the sitting president react? It would be a peculiar type of Gettysburg which led our struggling nation to "heightened militarized domestic repression and more imperialist aggression abroad."

It seemed to uswe could be wrong!that Bouie wasn't recognizing the full sweep of the possibilities at this dangerous time. Meanwhile, Ezra Klein, like Bouie, is very smartbut we thought the highlighted assertion was flatly, baldly inaccurate:

Trump Has Overwhelmed Himself

[...]

This is a presidency that is, by any measure, failing. Trump is unpopular; his brutality and his tariffs have turned immigration and affordability, once among of his strongest issues, into liabilities. Trump’s opposition is increasingly united and mobilized; Democrats are besting Republicans in elections all across the country and disciplined, brave, beautiful protest movements have emerged in the cities ICE has sought to occupy.

From what planet does that assertion hail? By the apparent "measure" of the sitting president, his presidency isn't failing at all On the planet where he seems to live, his presidency continues to be a miraculous success. 

(Clinical) delusion being what it is, we ourselves don't doubt the possibility that the sitting president truly believes his claims about his astounding success. For example, we don't doubt the possibility that he really does believe that he won the 2020 election! 

Does he really believe such things? On this campus, we have no idea, in part because Klein and Bouie have joined the rest of the guild in agreeing that medical specialists must never be asked to share what they know about the workings of (diagnosable) "delusional disorder."

We Blues! When we sing our tribal songs, echoing Achilles of old, we agree that such possibilities must not impinge on our tribal pleasure. We'll suggest that you ponder this:

As you may know, "Song Sung Blue" was and is one of Neil Diamond's most popular songs. To see him perform it, click here.

(We remember our conversation, long ago, with our friend, the comedian [NAME WITHHELD], in which we savants agreedDiamond could sing any page in the phone book and make it sound profound. It's an amazing performance skilla skill of high persuasion.)

In his popular "Song Sung Blue," Diamond was talking about a different kind of blue song. But in his lyrics, one key phrase almost seems to ring a bell in the present day:

Song Sung Blue

[...]

Funny thing, but you can sing it with a cry in your voice
And before you know it you get to feeling good
You simply got no choice...

Before you know it, you get to feeling good! Seeking such a type of deliverance is a well-known human tendency. 

We still haven't mentioned the way O'Donnell won the Pulitzer Prize last night. Also, we haven't had time to comment on the pathetic omissions which can be ascribed to this morning's report in the New York Times:

Also, we haven't mentioned that other column from the New York Times, the column by David French. That column also appeared this weekend. Yesterday, it appeared in print editions of the Times.

Blue Americans won't get to "feelin' good" in the course of French's column. French says the signs are abundantly clearthe sitting president isn't planning to permit a normal set of congressional elections to take place this year.

French could always be wrong, of coursebut he could also be right. We recently read this nostrum somewhere:

Strongmen are at their most dangerous when they feel threatened.

Attention, Blues! Our journalistic elites have failed us every step of the way. That dates all the way back to the invention of the Whitewater pseudo-scandal (now long forgotten), followed by the twenty-month war against Candidate Gore.

That said, what happens in the mainstream press corps' guild stays inside the guildand every guild member knows he or she must abide by that rule. 

We thought we heard a song sung Blue. Is there any possible chance that we're being ill-served again?

Tomorrow: What Lawrence O'Donnell (and only O'Donnell) correctly and angrily did

This afternoon: Gutfeld, off the wagon

In our view, a brilliant self-portrait: We never were Neil Diamond fans. But has anyone ever defined himself more brilliantly, or more concisely, than he did right here?

I Am, I Said

[...]

Did you ever read about the frog
Who dreamed of being a king
And then became one?
Well except for the names
And a few other changes,
If you talk about me,
The story's the same one...

Wow! Translation, within the context of the song:

Today, I'm a giant star in L.A.but that's not who I actually am! 


114 comments:


  1. Like I said before: President should deal with the globalist insurgency in MN by sending the army there. With a massive, massive show of force. Showing weakness would be catastrophic. It would be the end of the US of A, as a sovereign nation.

    Keep draining the swamp, Mr. President, keep draining the swamp. There is no other way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unhunh, A war in one of Americas most lovely and loving cities. Murder thousands of your own citizens for absolutely no fucking reason. Get the fuck out of here you stupid fucking troll.

      Delete
    2. It's good that you're so self-critical, Soros-monkey. But would take you, Soros-monkey, ages to become a troll. You're a spammer now, and you will stay a spammer for the foreseeable future.

      Delete
    3. 11:08 human garbage

      Delete
  2. I agree that the battle over illegal immigrants in Minneapolis is a PR disaster for Trump. One reason is that the biased mainstream media choose to leave out half the story. Only conservative media like the NY Post and National Review are reporting on the organized group that impedes ICE. The group is funded by billionaire George Soros. Good and Pretty were part of this group. They were not innocent victims. https://nypost.com/2026/01/08/us-news/heres-whos-really-behind-the-minneapolis-ice-resistance-movement/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. go take a flying fuck, dickhead, you fascist freak. you don't approve of the bad Jew's money, only the fucking fascist's money

      Delete
    2. Are you really accusing me of antisemitism?

      Delete

      Delete
    3. are you stupid, dickhead? did I accuse you of antisemitism? you are a self-hating Jew, we all know this, don't be so sensitive. I know, all you fascists have to say is Soros, and you wet your pants, fucking cowards cunts.

      Delete
    4. Go away stupid troll David. We all hate every time we see another trollish stupid fucking post. You dumbfuck.

      Delete
    5. You have established that you are a self hating Jew David. And you hate ni-grows. Now that you have accomplished your mission you can get the fuck out of here you fucking unrelenting piece of shit troll.

      Delete
    6. David in Cal,
      Of course the media is liberally biased.
      The media is owned by corporations, so they are naturally going to side with the Left, who understand basic mathematics, and not a bunch of mouth-breathing Right-wing losers.
      When balance sheets and P&L statements are calculated using shitheads whining because they are losing their white privilege, and not basic math, corporations will become biased towards the Right.
      Bet on it.

      Delete
    7. TLDR DiC: Trump is a disaster. Get the fuck out of here troll.

      Delete
  3. This article explains 19 different types of election fraud. I don't know to what degree they've happened in various areas, but we cannot be certain that they were not used nor to what degree they have have been used. Potential election fraud is all around us. It must be opposed with the utmost vigor.

    https://ljagilamplighterwright.substack.com/p/election-fraud-101

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. go fuck yourself, dickhead, you fascist freak. Is "black votes counting" on that fucking list, u racist bastard?

      Delete
    3. you are a fucking fascist, dickhead. you would sell out your own mother for trump

      Delete
    4. https:/ruanutcase?/.com

      This article explains the activities the Abominable Snowman does to disrupt our lives.

      I don't know which of them are true, in fact I have no idea what I'm talking about, but I do know potential Snowman disruption is all around us and must be opposed with the utmost vigor.

      FBI agents will soon travel to the Himalayas to collect more information.

      Thank you President Trump.

      Delete
    5. The states "are agents of the federal government". Donald J Chickenshit, 2/3/26

      are you swallowing that, dickhead, you motherfucking fascist freak? you buying that???

      Delete
    6. Unlike Hector, I think election fraud is a big risk. Elections can be so important that it stands to reason some people will resort to fraud. I've heard people say that if they could kill Trump without risk to themselves, they would do it. Some of these people would commit election fraud if they could. If Trump is Hitler, aren't you morally obliged to do whatever you can to help defeat him and his candidates?

      Or, look at all the frauds by which people steal money: FTX, Binance, Theranos, Somali schools, etc. It's reasonable to worry that there may also be a lot of election fraud.

      Delete
    7. Fuck off. Democrats are not plotting to kill Trump. Nothing justifies Republican fraud.

      Delete
    8. Just get the fuck out of here David. God you are a stupid fucking troll.

      Delete
    9. Evection fraud is the only way globalists-serving Democrats can get any votes.

      Delete
    10. 12:22 absolutely you stupid fucking troll.

      Delete
    11. Triggered, Hillary?

      Delete
    12. David thinks that election fraud is such a significant concern, he won't mind when Trump cancels the elections altogether. We cannot be too sure.
      Did you actually read the page to which you linked, David? It's hilariously stupid.

      Delete
    13. Shorter DiC: "I don't know." Go away useless troll.

      Delete
    14. Trump was the original instigator of the "election fraud is a problem" propaganda in 2016. He appointed a committee headed by a like minded republican to ferret out the problem; after a year of work they came back empty handed. There has never been any subsequent study to suggest that election fraud accounts for any meaningful amount of ballots in any audited study. Moreover the miniscule number of illegitimate ballots cast that have been discovered have not been for the democratic candidate specifically. This concern is entirely manufactured by MAGA . Like the voting machine lies that Fox played out for handsomely, it is the usual garbage disseminated by bullshit artists like DiC.

      Delete
    15. In the wise words of Mr. T: I pity the fool who buys into the nonsense that David linked to.
      There's one obvious reason why non-citizens wouldn't attempt to vote: they have everything to lose and nothing to gain.

      Delete

    16. Ha-ha. Denial is not a river in Egypt, Soros-monkey.

      What they gain, of course, is money. Money from a certain billionaire-currency-speculator-and-former-Nazi-minion-in-Budapest, Soros-monkey.


      Delete
    17. Fuck off idiot troll. Go play in your sewer.

      Delete
    18. The people have already asked for a Billionaire Wealth Tax of 35%, to fund the government tracking down each and every eligible voter and giving them a free Voter ID.
      The Republican Party has the votes in both the House and Senate to make it happen, as soon as they feel stopping election fraud is as important to sucking-up to the nation's elites who fund them.

      Delete
    19. My understanding is the January 6th insurrection was caused by economically anxious Republican voters pissed off at Congress for not taxing billionaires to fund the Voter ID program. That's probably the reason Trump pardoned them.

      Delete
    20. 2:49; why don’t you come back with some evidence, douchebag, instead of pulling shit out your ass? Funny, every time you maggots go looking for voter fraud you end up finding some retired maggots in Florida doing it. Lol



      Delete
    21. TLDR David in Cal: "Kill Trump"

      Delete
  4. "Before we describe O'Donnell's performance..."

    O'Dopnnell is a journalist not a performer. Gutfeld is a performer. How is Somerby so confused about the basics of journalism?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. "O'Dopnnell" is a Soros-monkey.

      Delete
    2. Fuck off troll.

      Delete
    3. Yes, "O'Dopnnell" is a Soros-monkey, Soros-monkey.

      Delete
    4. Why do idiot trolls hate Jews? Could they just go fling poo in their own playpen and leave us the fuck alone?

      Delete
    5. Calling O'Donnell "a Soros-monkey" is the smartest, most well thought out economic idea the Republican Party has had, since Putin took it over.

      Delete
  5. "Also, we recalled the way he had doomed himself with what he said to Billy Bush on that Access Hollywood videotape!"

    Trump thought he was doomed. That's why he engaged in suppressing the Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal stories using fraud to cover up payments to them.

    Would those stories have ended his campaign, without the Russia-funded social media campaign targeting black voters in the blue wall states (which Trump so narrowly won)? Would Trump have won without paying third party candidates to stay in the race? Would he have won without Wikileaks of hacked Democratic computers, without Comey's last-minute letter, played up by the press as new info, when it had nothing to do with Hillary at all?

    Trump thought he was in trouble. Why doesn't Somerby?

    Now we are hearing that there is new proof of Russian meddling in US politics. Why isn't Somerby interested in that, instead of blaming Democrats for thinking Hillary was going to win in an election she should have won?

    Somerby is as annoying as David in Cal, which isn't surprising given that they both focus on trolling Dems while pretending to discuss political issues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You had me until "Somerby is as annoying as David in Cal." The fucking idiot David is an unrelenting nasty ass troll.

      Delete
    2. Somerby has been here longer than David in Cal. Somerby is nasty ass too. Today he is complaining because some press is talking about Trump's decline.

      Delete
    3. You say potato...

      Delete
  6. "Will reaction to the fatal shooting of Michael Pretti prove to be the downfall of the sitting president? Everything is possible!"

    You've got to love how Somerby takes a bold stand. The statement "Everything is possible" does a lot of heavy lifting in Somerby's essays. It takes the place of argument and evidence while simultaneously denying what he has said, in a semi-satirical, sardonic, ironic, sarcastic kind of way. So Somerby can have it all ways at once, in case whatever he is proposing turns out not to be possible at all.

    The downfall of the sitting president is that he is mentioned on every page of the Epstein files, named as a rapist of young girls and co-sex trafficker in a scheme that is now being tied to Russian kompromat. The downfall of the sitting president is his massive corruption and grifting, while he destroys public monuments and historical buildings for sport. More importantly, the downfall of the sitting president is that his own age and poor health are catching up with him and he may not be sentient by the time impeachment catches up with him. But Somerby focuses daily on nothing important to any of this.

    Pretti's death was a tragedy for our nation. It symbolizes the way this sitting president has trampled on our constitutional rights, but it is far from the most important crimes and far from what will ultimately remove Trump and bring our country closer to normal. Meanwhile, it is offensive that Somerby uses Pretti's death to further his own talking points. Whatever Somerby says, Pretti is important to use blues and doesn't deserve to be one of Somerby's incoherent rambling points today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't really think Somerby is a Russian asset, like most of the Republican Congress, but anything is possible.

      Delete
    2. Somerby is among the other standups who became Russian shills in 2015 and on.

      Delete
  7. If anyone is a frog, it is Somerby.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The Howler gets results (at long last)!:

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/washington-post-begins-sweeping-layoffs/

    ReplyDelete
  9. Oddly, Somerby blames journalistic attacks on blue candidates on the journalists, not the right wing that originated them.

    "Attention, Blues! Our journalistic elites have failed us every step of the way. That dates all the way back to the invention of the Whitewater pseudo-scandal (now long forgotten), followed by the twenty-month war against Candidate Gore."

    Note that both the Clintons and Gore are Democrats. The opposition that fed journalists the dirt was organized right wing ratfuckery. Somerby seems to expect some partisan help from the press, which it couldn't provide. The lies told by the right wing noise machine are not created by the press. And yet Somerby is reluctant to blame the right for what obviously originated there and has been part of their modus since Tricky Dick. The last honest Republican campaign was Eisenhower's.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I remember when Somerby blamed the press for uncovering Gary Hart's infidelity, causing him to leave the presidential race. I don't recall Somerby musing over the double standard, that Hart should have to drop his campaign while Trump's infidelities make him more appealing, even to his evangelical supporters who supposedly believe in family values. Why do Republican scandals make them stronger, not ineligible?

      The answer to that question isn't part of journalism. It rests with Republican voters and I can't see anything admirable about it when the voters refuse to look for non-criminal and non-sexually aberrant candidates in favor of someone like Trump. Is winning everything, or do they just not care about living in accordance with values.

      Republicans are never held accountable. Why is that? The press doesn't hold anyone accountable -- the voters do that. Why don't Republican voters hold their candidates accountable for their malfeasance?

      Delete
    2. Because it is about power with them. Not morality. It's never been about justice or morality. Always about power and punching down on people.

      Delete
    3. Eisenhower campaigned on strengthening Social Security and expanding Union membership. Haha

      Delete
  10. "We thought we heard a song sung Blue. Is there any possible chance that we're being ill-served again?"

    Who are the songs being sung by? Somerby seems to think they come from the journalists, but it is the politicians and voters who make the news, not those who report it. But if we, the blues, sing our own songs, how then are we being "ill-served"? And why does Somerby never call upon the right to reject the journalism that is supposedly ill-serving them? Maybe because Fox is not actually journalism but "state run media," the propaganda arm of the right wing and Trump's presidency, whereas the mainstream and legacy media are not "blue" at all but also working for the right, when not furthering its own self interest. Who serves the left? Some independent media (which Somerby never discusses) but otherwise no one. And that makes us less able to direct lies and propaganda at voters -- we have to convince them instead of gaslighting them. It is more difficult and causes us to lose when we should win more often, but at least we have integrity in blue America.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Neil Diamond's lyrics about becoming a king just by wishing for it, does not describe Trump. For one thing, Diamond is describing feeling like an imposter, being a frog inside still and recognizing it while being applauded by fans. Trump's grandiosity makes him the opposite -- he feels like a king inside and is strugging to become one outside by acquiring power, frustrated when others do not applaud him.

    How does Somerby misread Diamond's intent? In both cases, the men are frogs. The difference is that Diamond knows he is still a frog, while Trump does not, thinking himself a king who deserves more accolades that he struggles to receive.

    Somerby often gets stuck in superficialities, not looking deeper once he is hooked by a word or phrase. At least he refers to context here, but he doesn't seem able to think about why these two men are not similar at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Deep down inside, Trump knows that he's a fraud, which is why he cannot deal with any criticism. Although, at this time, Trump is descending rapidly into dementia, so hard to say how he views the world.

      Delete
    2. Neil Diamond was never a fraud, no matter what he felt like inside. I don't like his style either but he earned his fans.

      Delete
    3. Trump, a businessman and entertainer, thinks that he's President of the United States and the most powerful human being on the planet. That's reality, not dementia.

      Delete
    4. David, this is only true if Trump is actually the president, and not being manipulated by Stephen Miller on behalf of Putin. Trump is using his "power" to order McDonald's hamburgers in the middle of the night, and play with his military as if they were toy soldiers, not to achieve anything on behalf of the people. That's fantasy. Compare this term to his first term, when he didn't have dementia. The changes are obvious. Look at the East Wing to see what Trump has become.

      Delete
    5. And Trump is still deep in the throes of dementia, regardless of whether his title is president.

      Delete
    6. Do you hate Stephen Miller because he's Jewish, Soros-monkeys?

      Delete
    7. You, Soros-monkey, are deep in the throes of TDS.

      Delete
    8. Troll logic, blues hate Miller because he is a Jew, and post about it to get paid by Jew Soros. Get the fuck out of here weirdo.

      Delete
    9. Shorter DiChead, Trump is a fraud. Get the fuck out of here you mindless troll.

      Delete
    10. Yeah, like the only reason to hate Stephen Miller is because he's Jewish. What a stupid argument.

      Delete
    11. Stephen Miller hates himself because he's a Jew. I was talking with my partner about it. The example that came to mind was Henry Kissinger. Kissinger was in the army unit that liberated one of the concentration camps. Kissinger did not feel pity or empathy for the Jews who survived or perished there. They had no one to blame but themselves. Miller rejects his Jewishness, as did Kissinger. That's why Miller has this dead look in his eyes. He has killed his inner Jew and now he's just pure fascist evil.

      Delete

    12. It's so sad that you Soros-monkeys hate Stephen Miller just because he's a Jew.

      You Soros-monkeys need to do some soul searching (assuming you have souls) and look deeeeep into yourself.


      Delete
    13. Soros monkeys post their hatred of Jews so Jewish Soros pays them. Idiot fucking trolls gotta go.

      Delete
    14. It is true: I don't have a soul.

      Delete

    15. As for you, immigrant Soros-bot, tell me: how retarded one has to be for not understanding that talking shit, publicly, about the country that kindly accepted you as immigrant is disgraceful?

      I hope your green card or naturalization certificate will soon be cancelled, relieving you from the necessity to live your life in this fascist hellhole.


      Delete
    16. "It's so sad that you Soros-monkeys hate Stephen Miller just because he's a Jew."

      Whatever it takes.

      Delete
    17. The apostle Paul had this in common with Stephen Miller - both are Jews who enjoyed (enjoy) using the power of the state to harm others. Paul found God and worked to atone for his sins. Miller is just a nasty fuckwit with zero concern for his crimes. I don't know about hell, but hopefully Nuremburg is in that assholes future.

      Delete
  12. "We thought we heard a familiar old song sung Blue."

    Somerby then describes a couple of headlines describing declining poll support and political damage to Trump. The first question is not whether Dems like hearing such results, but whether they are true. Trump has been declining in the polls and losing support over things like the Pretti shooting, including on the right. So, such songs are factually true -- polls results are increasingly unfavorable to Trump (who denies it).

    When Somerby dismisses such articles as "songs sung blue," he implies that they are fabricated to please blue readers. That doesn't seem to be the case. Beyond that, why shouldn't blue advances be described when they are true? There are some benefits to us from reading stories positive to our cause. Reminding the public that there is strong Democratic support helps us in upcoming midterms. Is that why Somerby denigrates such stories? Because they encourage blue voters and support the belief that we will continue to flip seats in elections later this year? Predictions of victory help create a bandwagon effect that can help blue candidates.

    Those who suggest that Somerby is not advancing right wing memes and talking points, please explain why Somerby is mocking songs sung blue when they are justified by polling and helpful to blue candidates this Fall. His mockery, his suggestion that the press does not serve us blues well by such headlines and stories, only benefits the right. If someone makes a prediction that doesn't pan out, no one is hurt by that. We are just disappointed. But the mismatch between predictions based on polling and actual results can direct attention to the campaign-related misbehavior that occurred in Trump's prior campaigns. And that is helpful to blue America.

    What is the harm in encouraging persistence among those who oppose Trump? Are we supposed to give up and give in to him?

    Tomorrow's question: Why didn't Somerby campaign for Al Gore, the way Tommy Lee Jones did?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Here is the way O'Donnell and every other leftist "won the Pulitzer Prize." There is precedent with Walter Duranty.

    Duranty's prize-winning dispatches were praised by the Pulitzer committee for their "dispassionate interpretive reporting" on Soviet plans like the Five-Year Plan. However, his work has been exposed for downplaying or denying the emerging famine and broader horrors of Stalin's regime.

    In subsequent reporting during the famine's peak (e.g., a famous 1933 article titled "Russians Hungry But Not Starving"), he dismissed reports of mass starvation as "exaggeration or malignant propaganda," claimed there was no actual famine (only food shortages and malnutrition-related diseases), and echoed Soviet propaganda lines.

    Privately, he admitted to diplomats that millions (possibly up to 10 million) had died, showing he knew the truth but chose to mislead publicly—often attributed to access privileges from Soviet authorities, personal sympathies, or careerism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Times has only gotten worse since then.What do you call 500 freshly laid off Washington Post staffers? A good start.

      Delete
    2. If you think the demise of mainstream journalism is good, think about what will replace it.

      Delete
    3. 1:03 is an idiot troll pining for the end of America.

      Delete
    4. Anyone want to try to make the case that Mao is less moral than any other standard-issue Right-winger?

      Delete
  14. Democratic Party Approval Rating

    🟢 Approve: 29% (-42)
    🔴 Disapprove: 71%

    Marquette | 1/21-28 | 1,003 A

    Trump approval among Hispanic voters

    🟤 January 26: Disapprove -41
    🟤 February 2: Disapprove -18

    🟢 23% shift among Hispanic voters to approve Trump

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Asshole troll. Fuck off.

      Delete
    2. If posting that garbage makes you feel happy, go ahead and be delusional. The downward spiral for Trump and his enablers is recorded every special election. Trump's approval rating after his presidency, in 2021 was at 31%. He is heading back there. An utter disaster.

      Delete
    3. In that Marquette poll, Democrats showed disappointment with their party's functioning in Congress, but loyalty to Democratic candidates in future elections (higher than Republicans). So Dems are planning to vote Democratic in midterms despite being unhappy with Dems in Congress.

      Also, the poll shows that Independent voters are swinging left not right, with most planning to vote Democratic in the midterms.

      Delete
    4. Shorter 1:48: Asshole troll, fuck off.

      Delete
  15. "Will reaction to the fatal shooting of Michael Pretti prove to be the downfall of the sitting president? Everything is possible!"

    Who is Michael Pretti? Are you confusing him with another hoax, Michael Brown who violently threatened the lives of LEO's forcing them to act with lethal force in self defense?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why focus on Pretti? Epstein will be Trump's downfall. The worsening economy will be Trump's downfall. Trump's worsening health will be his downfall. The impeachment bills already filed in the House will be his downfall. Or perhaps Putin will get tired of him and drop some kompromat. Everything is possible!

      Delete
    2. Fuck off troll 1:07.

      Delete
    3. What kompromat do you think would do the trick? Like if there's a recording where Putin patiently explains to Trump how to destroy the US? And Trump goes: can you go over it one more time, Vlad? I doubt that would make any difference.
      In any case, why would Putin get tired of Trump?

      Delete
    4. Trump has not been able to achieve success in Ukraine because Trump has no influence with NATO or Zelensky. Putin's lingering goal of dismantling the UN is unlikely to happen while Trump's Board of Peace is seen as a joke. Trump is getting more troublesome to manipulate due to his increasing dementia and obsession with his own goals (Nobel Prize, building a ballroom) that have no overlap with Putin's interests. Trump cannot run again, so he is useless to Putin politically, especially given Trump's increasing political problems.

      Delete
    5. Pretti is no Micah X. Johnson, but it's hard to compete with the person voted "The Greatest American of the 21st Century".

      Delete
    6. TLDR 3:53: I'm so sad I had to go to the way back machine.

      Delete
    7. Try reading instead of making shit up.

      Delete
  16. https://digbysblog.net/2026/02/04/its-millers-time/

    Digby discusses polling showing that most people, including many Republicans, want to see Stephen Miller gone and want changes to ICE procedures.

    This is not a "song sung blue" when the polling shows bipartisan support for something Dems have been wanting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People are beginning to feel the chill of fascism in their bones. Around 25% are fine with it. Some are just too obtuse to notice.

      Delete
  17. When he advocates anything, Somerby seems to favor a bothsider centrist or moderate viewpoint. G. Elliott Morris finds that such a political group does not exist. He says that most so-called moderates are non-ideological:

    "The vast majority of the “moderates” are just completely non-ideological. Just over 80 percent of the respondents who scored between a -2 and 2 on either economic or social ideology had an ideological thinking score of 0 or 1. These “moderates” are not moderate, they’re disengaged. They didn’t express centrist views balancing left and right, or a preference for moderation on policy. They expressed no ideological views at all.

    I took all 4,500 classified respondents in Steve’s data and calculated the following composition of the electorate based on voters scores on the three variables (”ideological thinking,” left-right economic policy, left-right social policy).

    Disengaged (34%): Low ideology scores and no clear issue positions

    Issue-focused but not ideological (25%): Mention economic or social concerns without ideological framing

    Ideological right (19%): Clear conservative positioning

    Ideological left (16%): Clear liberal positioning

    Mixed/moderate (6%): True centrists or ideological misfits

    The “center” of American politics isn’t populated by careful centrists weighing “both sides” of the policy debate, or people who want the Democrats or Republicans to retreat from extremism. It’s populated by people who want their daily lives to be easier and aren’t really thinking about politics at all."

    https://www.gelliottmorris.com/p/more-evidence-of-non-ideologues

    "As Morris writes:

    The median voter isn’t moderate, at least in how they describe what they like about the two major parties. Our data suggests that when it comes to how they feel about parties, the average American isn’t thinking ideologically at all.

    Instead, most people are thinking about conditions: prices, wars, group conflicts, and whether things just feel like they’re getting better or worse. This suggests that a campaign more about conditions of daily life and the country would be more successful than seeking out issues or groups you can campaign against to seem ideologically “heterodox” (the 2025 word of the year for DC strategists and pundits).

    This also explains why “moderate” candidates don’t automatically win. Contrary to the strategy implied by Median Voter Theorists, if you’re pitching yourself as the sensible centrist, you’re appealing to a constituency that barely exists. Just as the No Labels candidate for president. The voters in the middle aren’t there because they carefully weighed the options; they’re there because they’re not paying attention to the ideological debate at all."

    Somerby has formerly preached that we should be listening to The Others and trying to find a middle ground. That doesn't work ideologically and there is no middle waiting to be appealed to among non-ideological voters. Just people with their own self-interest and concern about their own well-being. Digby thinks the Independents are swinging left because the vibe of the country is chaotic and negative (with fears of imminent war, economic problems, unrest over immigration).

    Somerby likes to quote conservative editorial writers who he considers centrist/moderate, but these people have no real constituency

    ReplyDelete
  18. Thom Hartmann is worried about the concentration camps that Trump is creating:

    "Over 70,000 People Detained in 225 Concentration Camps, With Plans to Double Them: Why Isn’t This a National Emergency?

    ICE’s nationwide detention system continues to expand under plans that would double its size while shielding it from meaningful accountability…

    As people testified before Congress yesterday about the brutality and violence they’d suffered at the hands of ICE, that massive paramilitary organization was shopping for giant warehouse-style facilities they can retrofit into what they euphemistically call “detention centers.”

    Cable news people call them “prison camps” or “Trump prison camps,” but look in any dictionary: prisons are where people convicted of crimes are held. As Merriam-Webster notes, a prison is:

    “[A]n institution for confinement of persons convicted of serious crimes.”

    Jails are where people accused of crimes but still waiting for their day in court are held, as Merriam-Webster notes:

    “[S]uch a place under the jurisdiction of a local government for the confinement of persons awaiting trial or those convicted of minor crimes.”

    But what do you call a place where people who’ve committed no criminal offense (immigration violations are civil, not criminal, infractions)? The fine dictionary people at Merriam-Webster note the proper term is “concentration camp”:

    “[A] place where large numbers of people (such as prisoners of war, political prisoners, refugees, or the members of an ethnic or religious minority) are detained or confined under armed guard.”

    -------------------------------

    This is entirely in line with the Nazi White Supremacist plans of Stephen Miller and Trump's other Nazi appointees, in line with the harrassment of people with brown skin, whether immigrants or citizens. Who are these being built to hold? We should all be asking that and we should all oppose the creation of such camps in our country. We are not the Third Reich and we should have learned during WWII where this kind of authoritarian abuse leads. I think Thom Hartmann and others are right to be worried about this. At the least, it is a waste of money to bully and persecute a segment of our population, including the people our President is sworn to protect not abuse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every migrant policy is wrong. Yes, current policy is bad. Deporting suspected illegal immigrants without a hearing would be very bad. And, letting all the illegal immigrants stay here is wrong. I don't know which of these policies is the least bad, but this impossible decision shows how important it is to not let illegal immigrants in going forward. Trump and Homan are doing well at this duty. A wall could only help

      Delete
    2. President Biden worked with Congress to develop comprehensive true immigration reform, but that fucking fascist abomination who was screaming maniacally about Haitians eating our pets squashed the legislation. Now we have insanity and the government terrorizing American citizens.

      You can go fuck yourself, dickhead.

      Delete

    3. "Deporting suspected illegal immigrants without a hearing would be very bad."

      I don't understand this. There's no presumption of legal residency; the burden of proof is on you. You need to have a ssn, and some ids. And if you don't, you're an illegal alien. Simple as that.

      Delete
    4. Duh. Not as simple as that trumptard. Do you think there are any bureaucratic processes involved that might leave you in limbo for a year or 2?

      Duh.

      Delete
    5. Anyone who can't make-up nine digits off the top of their head deserve to be deported.

      Delete
    6. And, letting all the illegal immigrants stay here is wrong.
      Why? This has literally been the US policy for decades. It was understood that when someone was plugged in into the society, we would leave them alone, unless some exigent circumstances came up. George H.W. Bush was asked whether we should pay for undocumented children to go to school and he said -- "yes" -- that was back in '88.

      Delete
    7. TLDR David in Cal: Trumps migrant policies are wrong.

      Delete
    8. If you don't get a hearing, how can you show your documentation proving citizenship? ICE agents won't look at your papers -- they want their bonuses.

      Delete

    9. You show your documentation proving citizenship just like you show your license and registration to the cop who stopped you on a road, retarded Soros-bot.

      Delete

    10. It doesn't matter what any Bush said, Soros-monkey. What matters is what the congress said. And the congress said that illegal aliens should be deported.

      Delete
    11. Congress said no such thing.

      Delete
    12. lol, maggot, since when does king orange chickenshit care what Congress does

      Delete
    13. ICE doesn’t look at documents.

      Delete
  19. Twice I tried to quote from Rude Pundit and it was disappeared. It didn't even have any profanity, but it did legitimately ask why the guys listed in the Epstein Files were still working in govt positions. They have embarrassed themselves and shown very poor judgment. Those are grounds for firing them, so why are they still here?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TLDR 4:32 - Trump and his advisors are child rapists.

      Delete
    2. Why do they still have jobs?

      Delete