SATURDAY: Mayor Mamdani spoke with Nawaz!

SATURDAY, MARCH 21, 2026

You know it when you see it: "Presidential timber" is hard to find. You know it when see you see it. 

There are one hundred United States senators. Within the political realm, they're all extremely high achievers. 

Very few of them are real presidential timber. We don't mean that as a criticism.

Last night, we were surprised to see that elusive quality right there on our TV screen. We saw it in someone who's only 34 years old. 

By law, he can't ever run for president. We were surprised to see it, but there it was, unmistakably, right there on the screen.

Amna Nawaz conducted the interview for the PBS NewsHour. The first exchange went like this

NAWAZ (3/20/26): Mr. Mayor, welcome to the News Hour. Thanks for making the time. 

MAYOR MAMDANI: Absolutely. Thank you so much for being here.  

NAWAZ: So let's talk a little bit about your first few months in office. You really had to hit the ground running. You had a lot coming at you too. You had a major nurses strike to handle, a record-breaking snowstorm.

I know you have probably heard the difference between campaigning in poetry, governing in prose. Does that bring true to you? Have you found that to be true?  

MAYOR MAMDANI: I think there's still a little poetry in the day-to-day. I think it's important that we don't let our imagination become constrained by what we are inheriting.

Mamdani's term as mayor on New York could always turn out badly. Also, because he was born in Uganda, he can't ever run for the White House.

That said, you know it when you see it! The smile, the poetry, the look to the future? We were surprised to see that all the key timber was there.

Elsewhere, possibly not so much! Tens of millions of fellow citizens will disagree, but this is the way Chris Hayes began Thursday night's All In program:

HAYES (3/19/26): Good evening from New York. I'm Chris Hayes. 

You know, every once in a while, you just have to remind yourself that the president of the United States is a sociopathor at the very least, being charitable here, he just can't help himself from acting like one.

And that's particularly relevant right now as the man is directing the military might of this nation in yet another war in the Middle East, and that is not going well.  

Is the current sitting president a "likely sociopath?" Hayes floated that notion at least six times as his monologue continued. 

As we've noted, "sociopath" isn't a clinical term. Beyond that, we'd prefer to see this question discussed by (carefully chosen) medical specialistsand we'd rather see any such affliction portrayed as a deeply unfortunate (though dangerous) illness, not as a source of insult or denigration.  

That said, that's where Hayes began on Thursday night. Real Clear Politics transcribed the first several minutes of what he said. You can see fuller videotape at the All In site.

Beyond all that, we're forced to report that Greg Gutfeld, 61 years old, fell off the wagon again last night. For whatever reason, there he went again, opening his program on the Fox News Channel with a "joke" in which he compared Joy Behar to "a hippo." 

Soon thereafter, things got substantially worse. We remain amazed but instructed by the fact that no major journalist in the Blue American firmament thinks this endless cultural swill is worth reporting or discussing. 

Our big Blue stars let this garbage. Our Blue stars, and our Blue orgs, just plainly don't seem to care

Now for the latest postponement! We're going to wait until next week to show you what Gutfeld and Emily Compagno said about James Talarico on Tuesday's edition of The Five

Can Talarico win the Texas Senate seat? We have no idea! But it should have been shocking to see him instantly compared, on the grisly Fox News Channel, to Ted Bundy and David Koresh. 

It should have been shockingbut by now it almost wasn't. 

"At long last," do the people who run that imitation news channel "have left no sense of decency?" And how about the finer people who agree to avert their gaze from this swill?

We'll turn to one quick Q-and-A from last evening's NewsHour. As a bit of background, Amna Nawaz was born and raised in the state of Virginia, the daughter of South Asian immigrants:

NAWAZ: I have to ask you about your family before I let you go, because I think anyone familiar with the specific and what I would say very fortunate experience of being raised by Desi parents, South Asian parents, especially those with the courage and the hope to forge an entirely new life in new nations, you know that you can learn a lot from them.

MAYOR MAMDANI: Yes.

So the mayor said. We thought of that favorite passage from My Antoniathe passage in which Willa Cather's gender-switched narrator is discussing the Nebraska "immigrant girls" for whom Cather, in real life, had a lifelong high regard:

My Antonia: Book II, Section IX

There was a curious social situation in Black Hawk. All the young men felt the attraction of the fine, well-set-up country girls who had come to town to earn a living, and, in nearly every case, to help the father struggle out of debt, or to make it possible for the younger children of the family to go to school.

Those girls had grown up in the first bitter-hard times, and had got little schooling themselves. But the younger brothers and sisters, for whom they made such sacrifices and who have had ‘advantages,’ never seem to me, when I meet them now, half as interesting or as well educated. The older girls, who helped to break up the wild sod, learned so much from life, from poverty, from their mothers and grandmothers; they had all, like Ántonia, been early awakened and made observant by coming at a tender age from an old country to a new.

They had learned so much from poverty! Has a more beautifully crafted statement ever been placed in print?

And yes, we'll admit it again. Yesterday, we took Francine Prose's book to the medical mission, where there's a lot of sitting around. 

We hadn't reread it in several years. We could spend weeks writing about every page in the parts of the book where Prose discusses who the real Anne Frank actually was:

("A demanding and often sickly baby, Anne grew into a challenging child—mercurial, moody, humorous, alternately outgoing and shy." Also, though, a much-loved, precocious child who was a gifted, determined young writer.)

Also, the parts of the book in which in which Prose discusses the remarkably complex way Anne Frank's famous book actually came to be written. 

Also, the part of the book in which Prose describes the serendipity thanks to which the famous writing in question wasn't carried away and discarded by the people who arrested Anne Frank, along with her parents and her older sister, Margot Frank. (Only her father survived.)

Postponing the torture of transcribing the latest statements of the Fox News Channel Two, we'll leave you today with Prose's description of the one tiny bit of film which remainsa piece of film which can be seen, even today, right there for the whole world to see on YouTube:

A FLICKER of a home movie. June 22, 1941. The whole thing lasts ten seconds.

The bicycles slipping by provide the only indication that we are in Holland. The brick Merwedeplein apartment block looks more like married students’ housing on an American state university campus than the quaint center-city canal houses we associate with Amsterdam.

The camera waits outside a door, peering up a stairwell. In search of something to focus on, it pans up the side of a building. In the open windows are neighborhood residents, girls and young women, their elbows propped on the sills, waiting. The women at the windows alter the look of the street, so the scene begins to look more like a village in southern Europe.

The newlywed couple appears, arm in arm, the groom in a top hat, cane, and formal wear, the bride in a flattering pale suit, a jaunty white fedora, and gloves; she carries a bouquet. They walk down the stairs and pause like movie stars obliging the paparazzi. Passersby lean against their bicycles, staring.

Suddenly, the camera zooms toward the sky and finds Anne Frank, watching from her window. She turns and speaks to someone inside the apartment. She looks back at the couple, then away. The camera appears to lose interest. It glances at a few more spectators, then returns to the Amsterdam street.

On the Web site for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, you can watch those few seconds of Anne on film, in blurred and grainy close-up. Anne’s body language is quick, electric. A breeze, or maybe the motion of her body, lifts her hair as she turns, and her eyes smudge into dark ovals as she gazes down at the bridal couple.

As familiar as we are with images of Anne Frank, as inured as we may think we are to the sight of her beautiful face, the film pierces whatever armor we imagine we have developed. It is always shockingly short and always the same, and yet you are never entirely sure what you have, or haven’t, seen. It’s less like watching a film clip than like having one of those dreams in which you see a long-lost loved one or friend. In the dream, the person isn’t really dead. You must have been mistaken. You wake up, and it takes a few moments to understand why the dream was so cruelly deceptive.

We're with Prose every word of the way. We regard that as sacred film, sacred film of a sacred being.

Anne Frank is so viewed in certain cultures around the world. But what could possibly make us think that she was, or that she is, some sort of "sacred being?"

We'll admit that you're asking a very good question. You know it when you see it, we'll thoughtfully say. Though we don't see it much around here!

For today, we chose to stay with Prose and Anne Frank. Ted Bundy, David Koresh?  

Fellow citizens, thank you for asking! We'll present that disaster next week, Blue American silence included.


211 comments:

  1. "As we've noted, "sociopath" isn't a clinical term. Beyond that, we'd prefer to see this question discussed by (carefully chosen) medical specialists—and we'd rather see any such affliction portrayed as a deeply unfortunate (though dangerous) illness, not as a source of insult or denigration. "

    With these words, Somerby absolves Trump of responsibility for his actions. Why? Because illnesses are not chosen, they happen to a person. And because insult and denigration are withheld from people who cannot help themselves for what they do. But is this true of Trump?

    We all have a personality and a set of innate characteristics with which we are born. Then life happens to us and our experiences mold us. But we also learn and we have the ability to control our actions and choose how we will cope with our circumstances. There is no one who cannot make their lives better or worse through those choices. We can and do hold people responsible for what they do in the face of their own life's challenges.

    But Somerby doesn't want to do that with Trump. He accepts whatever Trump does as illness and he argues that we should pity Trump, not try to protect our nation from his bad choices, his wrongdoing, his criminal activity and his mistakes. Somerby wants a doctor to get on TV and explain to us all why Trump is not to be held to account for what he does to us. And worse, Somerby does not believe we should try to do anything to remove Trump, to prevent him from starting unnecessary wars, spending money foolishly and hurting immigrants. There is no logic to this. It makes no sense at all. And I do hold Somerby responsible for the things he says here. His approach to Trump is very wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby has already written many times that we are stuck with Trump, because every Republican voter is a gigantic bigot. What more do you need him to say about the pieces of shit on the Right?

      Delete
    2. Having us listen to "the Others", and report back how they are as racist as fuck, is when Somerby realized all Republican voters are bigots.
      Before then, Bob was in denial about who they are.

      Delete
    3. Somerby tells us he believes Trump may be afflicted with an illness which is “dangerous.” Why in the world would this lead you to say that “Somerby does not believe we should do anything to remove Trump, to prevent him from starting unnecessary wars, spending money foolishly and hurting immigrants”?

      You just made all that shit up. Why? What’s wrong with you?

      Delete
    4. DG, nobody cares that you ignore Somerby's obvious attempt to manufacture ignorance.

      We all recognize you are a dope that simps for Somerby. We already know what is wrong with you, it is just not an interesting topic, you chasing your pretend butterflies.

      Delete
    5. Somerby directly said he did not support the last two impeachments.

      Delete
    6. Hey Ignorance Manufacturer: How long do you think you can con people into thinking that you're saying something profound by repeating this utterly meaningless phrase?

      Delete
    7. 4:24 - Show your work or I'll assume you're just making shit up.

      Delete
    8. Fuck off. No one cares what you believe.

      Delete
    9. 6:03 - So, I take that as confirmation that my assumption was true.

      Delete
    10. Do your own research.

      Delete
    11. I just did and discovered that you like to make shit up. But you''re an Anon; you can hide and make shit up another day without consequence.

      Delete
    12. So, post your quotes where Somerby supported impeaching Trump.

      Delete
    13. You enjoy carnal relations with goats. I don't have to prove it; you have to disprove it. Right?

      Delete
    14. “ Somerby directly said he did not support the last two impeachments.” He said impeaching Trump would violate the will of the voters who elected him. Many of us were here when Somerby said that.
      You are making a fool of yourself.

      Delete
    15. You say it’s so and so it’s so. Got it.

      Delete
    16. Others here can read too.

      Delete
    17. We all read. Some can support what they write; others can’t. The latter tend to fall back on the Trumpian “Everybody Knows!” formulation.

      Delete
    18. Or instead of supporting what they wrote, they challenge me to disprove what they wrote.

      Or they start name-calling. Or tell me to fuck off.

      You know — the usual.

      Delete
    19. On that point, I rest my case.

      Delete
    20. You never go away.

      Delete
    21. I'm with DG.
      If you think Somerby is making some kind of particular point, that's on you, not Somerby.

      Delete
    22. "What we have here is failure to communicate."

      Delete
    23. Children!, Please!

      Delete
  2. Somerby has decided he likes Mamdani. He quotes some stuff Mamdani said, but I don't see anything special or unusual, much less presidential, in what Somerby has quoted here. I suppose there is some element of charisma that doesn't come across in words on a screen. If so, I think Somerby should be careful -- charisma has nothing to do with the thoughtful judgment, wisdom, intelligence and expertise that a person brings to the presidency.

    Trump has charisma for many of his supporters. Has that made him a good president? Absolutely not. It has fooled people into thinking Trump has the ability needed to run our country, when he plainly does not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To be fair it is not clear Somerby likes Mamdani; it is more likely that he likes to use Mamdani, to push his own agenda.

      Delete
    2. Can you read?Somerby noted Mamdani cannot be President for chrissakes.

      Delete
    3. By "his own agenda," we mean that Somerby is yanking someone's chain with his references to Mamdani.

      Delete
  3. "Anne Frank is so viewed in certain cultures around the world. But what could possibly make us think that she was, or that she is, some sort of "sacred being?"

    We'll admit that you're asking a very good question. You know it when you see it, we'll thoughtfully say. Though we don't see it much around here!"

    There is nothing sacred about being a victim. There is nothing sacred about being 13 years old either. If we are lucky, we all grow past that age and get on with our lives. Anne Frank was unlucky to be Jewish in a place of war. There are children in that same situation today, including those girls at that Iranian school. Somerby spares no thoughts for them today, or he might have been more outraged at Trump's careless bombing. That war is no more justified than Hitler's was, with its targeting of Jews as scapegoats. Trump's scapegoats are immigrants and brown people who own oil that he covets. Or maybe Trump is just doing this to help out Putin. Whatever his reasons, Somerby should focus on today's atrocities. There is nothing he can do for Anne Frank today except make Prose a little wealthier by selling her book.

    People are suffering today because of Trump and Somerby is too busy mooning over Anne Frank to consider their plight. Whatta guy our Somerby is!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Someone explain this constant preoccupation with a thirteen year old girl.

      Delete
    2. 12:47 - Because you think he likes to whack off to her picture, right? Just have the courage to say it openly, rather than insinuating with all this coy bullshit. That way we know for sure that your mind is way, way down in the slimy sewer.

      Delete
    3. Is that your explanation? It makes sense because we know from the Epstein files that some men do that. If you have an alternative explanation, please let us know.

      What is Somerby himself coyly insinuating when he ridiculously calls Frank sacred? Is that perhaps his way of keeping his own mind out of that sewer? It is obvious he is obsessed with her, almost as much as with Gutfeld.

      Delete
    4. My "alternative explantion" is he admires her spirit. Now go slithering back where you came from, please!

      Delete
    5. OK, the frequency of posting about her and his own extravagant language are inconsistent with that belief. Try again.

      What other people has Somerby obsessed over because he likes their spirit?

      Delete
    6. Malala, but she was 13-14 yo also.

      Delete
    7. Not Chanel Miller or Stormy Daniels. They had spirit but are too old.

      Delete
    8. Just tell us why Somerby is so obsessed with Anne Frank, Malala, and Antonia. It isn’t because they had spirit. What is he trying to tell us?

      Delete
    9. Somerby has been going on about Anne Frank for years and uttering such garbage at times that it is difficult to parse exactly what his intentions are. As usual, however, he saves the best for last: that he will discuss "Blue American silence " at some point in the future. Be advised: don't hold your breath waiting..

      Delete
    10. The whole world is a silent place when you are deaf. Why does Somerby decide to selectively listen only to red America, ignoring the torrent of voices on the left?

      Delete
    11. Anne Frank and Malala. You make it sound as though they’re girls from the neighborhood. There are endless and tedious things to be annoyed about. It’s March Madness. God help us.

      Delete
    12. Somerby did once write a similarly gushing article about two young girls in his middle school class. I tried to find it but couldn't, using the search feature. He talked about their courage in leading their lives in urban Baltimore, using similarly icky language.

      Delete
    13. Cecelia, are you unaware that pedos use kiddie porn to express their urges? It is illegal to do that (no least because children are exploited to produce it). How would those who care about the Holocaust feel knowing someone like Somerby was using Anne Frank's picture in such a way? It seems to me it would compound the insult to Jews by those who mistreated and then killed them, Nazis and other haters. It is a way for Somerby to show his true feelings in a disguised way, if he felt that way about Jews and other targets of abuse. We can assume that Somerby is perhaps xenophobic, but what if he is worse? How would we be able to tell, given that he is so coy and sneaky about expressing himself on any topic? What we do know is that something is off about the way he discusses these young girls. We don't know why and he isn't saying. Those who are outraged on his behalf (ignoring that we are outraged on Anne Frank's behalf) need to supply some alternative explanation that makes sense. So far they haven't come up with anything plausible.

      Delete
  4. It's super easy to get people to deny the existence of climate change. All you need is red state governors begging Daddy Federal Government to bail them out from bad weather.
    Works like a charm.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Somerby, if you're listening, please don't talk about Ted Bundy or David Koresh again. They have nothing to do with anything and you don't know how to discuss their mental illness or their criminality. Are you even aware that most mentally ill people do not become criminals? They suffer pain and need treatment.

    If you want to focus on criminals, how about talking about Pam Bondi's pathology, or what is wrong with Kristi Noem, or Pete Hegseth's similarity to Brett Kavanaugh, or Epstein's pathology (is there such a thing as a sex addict?), or Melania's mental illness? Is it criminal to get in so deep with Russian oligarch's that you wind up money laundering and owing the rest of your life to them? Was it Trump's charisma that let others manipulate him into the presidency to the point where he is now enriching billionaires and facilitating huge corruption that our country will spend decades rooting out? Is all that too much for you to think about, that you come back day after day to dote on Anne Frank?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I never appreciated Biden before he was elected and could show his talent for governing. He doesn't have charisma, apart from appearing to be a good man. He did know what to do to help our country through covid. That is worth a great deal more to me (and our country) than whatever it is that attracts Somerby to Mamdani or Trump. Perhaps we should switch to a system where presidential candidates take a written test, instead of telling stories about serpents and Hannibal Lecter in front of crowds wearing red hats and adult diapers (outside their clothes)?

    Mamdani may have potential but he hasn't had the chance to show what he can do by governing yet. Newson has served as governor of CA (now the 4th largest economy in the world) for eight years. He is showing that he can resist Trump and do what is best for his state, filing lawsuits but also speaking truth to Trump's insanity and resisting the troops that Trump sent to harrass the people of Los Angeles and Sacramento.

    Unlike Somerby, I respect action not words. And unlike Mamdani, Newsom is elegible to run for president. I don't agree with every one of his positions, but I can tell competence when I see it, and that is worth a whole lot more than charisma.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Newsom, a well-spoken White man, would waltz into the presidency if he adjusted his views to support something like Medicare for All, taxing wealth more progressively, and holding Israel responsible for the harm they are causing.

      Delete
    2. "Medicare for All, taxing wealth more progressively, and holding Israel responsible for the harm they are causing"

      I support all of these. But if you think Newsom would "waltz into the presidency" if he adjusted his position to support these more strongly, then I feel you are not in tune with the median voter in the crucial swing state.

      Delete
    3. Democrats on other sites have recognized that we do not need a perfect candidate to beat the Republicans now that Trump has dug them into a hole. They have all done too much that is venal, including blocking the Epstein files, supporting this war, supporting DHS, allowing the tariffs to ruin the economy, failing to do their jobs in Congress, and not recognizing Trump's obvious decline. Republicans are going to lose because of these things, no matter who Democrats nominate. Pretending Newsom is just not quite right is ridiculous.

      We need to show enthusiasm for our party and rally the campaign workers so that we can get out the vote. If you can't get behind that, you are not one of us.

      Delete
    4. And the best way to rally the Party is to throw people out of it, right? And, BTW, who chose "Rando Anon" to be the arbiter of who gets to be in the tent?

      Delete
    5. So, now, expressing an opinion contrary to yours is "throwing people out of the party"? You are a fraud. No one can throw you out of anything. If so, you would be long gone for being an asshole. Your concern with nyms makes no sense and is just your excuse for attacking other people here. It seems to be a standard tactic on the right, given that Cecelia and AC/MA use it too.

      Delete
    6. Honest to God, 5:09, you have to keep up. It is 3:43 who said "You're not one of us." I mocked that by asking who this Rando was to throw people out of the Party. I'm arguing for a big tent -- anybody who wants to be a Dem is a Dem, even if they hold opinions that differ from mine. It is 3:43 who wants to kick people out.

      Delete
    7. Anyone who wants to register Democratic can do so. Anyone who wants to vote Democratic can do so. But you cannot be a Democrat and come here arguing Republican points of view, urging people not to vote for Democrats, spreading right wing memes and talking points. That makes you a fraud, if you say you are a Democrat. No one is kicking anyone out of anything, but if you claim you are liberal, the way Somerby does, and then use every opportunity to not only knock Biden but also Harris and Clinton and other elected Democrats, then you are not behaving like a Democrat and your claims are suspicious (at best). 3:43 has as much right to their opinion as you do to yours.

      When the problem in 2024 was low Democratic voter turnout, calling for more enthusiasm and GOTV effort seems like a natural. I don't see what your criticism of that is.

      Dems have pointed out that the right does not have a purity test. Why should we as Dems have one either? That is what 3:43 seems to be saying. Hold your nose and vote Democratic or we get someone much worse, like Trump. I hope all those Bernie and Jill Stein voters kicked themselves after 2024. And what could those Tulsi Gabbard voters have been thinking?

      No one here thinks you are any kind of Democrat, DG. Do or say whatever you want. You have no credibility here.

      Delete
    8. If you give me $10, I'll give you $100 for every time you can show that I "urged people not to vote Democratic."

      Delete
    9. And that's my persistent complaint here: Why do you feel the need to make shit up?

      Delete
    10. Fuck off. You are a troll. Go away.

      Delete
  7. Why is Somerby touting someone who cannot run for president, after showing little support for our actual candidates during the past 3 elections?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Now Somerby is complaining because Blue America doesn't talk about Ted Bundy enough? This is getting bizarre.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, that's not it. He's complaining that Blue doesn't talk about the sewage distributed by Fox News.

      This has been Your Host's preoccupation for decades

      Delete
    2. Ok, but that also makes little sense and has no connection to reality.

      So, same difference.

      Delete
    3. Perhaps it does make sense but you can't see it.

      Delete
    4. DG you are wasting people’s time again. Fuck off.

      Delete
  9. There are quite a few surviving diaries of teens who experienced the Holocaust or lived in Nazi Germany under Hitler but there are also books by adults in the same circumstances. Reading one of these shows a stark difference between the diary of Anne Frank and an adult experience. Diaries by teens include:

    Helga's Diary: A Young Girl's Account of Life in a Concentration Camp by Helga Weiss: Documents her journey through four Nazi concentration camps with her mother.

    The Diary of Petr Ginz, 1941-1942: Chronicles the experiences of a teenage boy before his deportation to Auschwitz.

    Rywka's Diary: Written by Rywka Lipszyc, a Jewish girl in the Łódź Ghetto, found at Auschwitz and published decades later.

    Anthony Acevedo's Diary: Detailed records kept by a POW in the Berga slave labor camp.

    Other notable diaries include those by Rutka Laskier, Renia Spiegel, and Dawid Rubinowicz.

    Elie Wiesel's "Night," about his camp experiences and Viktor Frankl's "Man's Search for Meaning," and Primo Levi's "Survival in Auschwitz" are important books by adult Holocaust survivors.

    Anne Frank's diary gained such attention because of its promotion by her father, who survived her. There was an Anne Frank industry, encouraged by making her diary required reading in US schools.

    But Anne Frank was no more sacred than any of the others who wrote books or who died in the camps. This is why Somerby's obsession with her comes across as creepy. His focus is on the girl, not the atrocities, not the coping as Frankl's was, not the suffering as Wiesel's was. Teen girls do not exist for men to crush on, the way Somerby does. Anne Frank's death is a lesson about mistreatment of people, including children. Given that the mistreatment is being repeated now in our own country in the ICE detention camps, and that it may escalate to include political prisoners if Trump gets his way, without Somerby saying a single word about such possibilities, is outrageous.

    Exaggerating Frank's talent compounds the atrocity. She was not a young Jane Austen. We have surviving novels written by Austen for comparison. Many girls keep diaries. With time on her hands, it is not a wonder that Frank did too. But calling her sacred instead of tragic is creepy. All children are sacred to their parents. This Holocaust was evil. So is Somerby's refusal to look at what is happening to teens and children in our own ICE detention facilities. Those people are describing their experiences but Somerby doesn't care about them. How do we know that? He hasn't talked about it at all.

    I am sorry Anne Frank didn't live to adulthood. She would likely have died by now, as many Holocaust survivors have done, after their immigration to the US and other places. Somerby does not honor that immigrant experience or respect the difficulties of those fleeing Nazi Germany who were refused entrance to the US. Talk about averting eyes! It is sickening that Somerby gushes over Frank while holding such negative views about immigrants in general and refusing to help today's saints and martyrs. He should be ashamed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Somerby does not honor that immigrant experience or respect the difficulties of those fleeing Nazi Germany who were refused entrance to the US."

      You just made this up out of whole cloth, right?

      Delete
    2. 3:57 -- You know, "Mini-Me" is available as a nym, in case you're interested.

      Delete
    3. Somerby is anti-immigrant. Everyone here knows that because of his criticism of Biden/Harris on border control and his disinterest in ICE abuses.

      Delete
    4. Ah - the "Everybody knows it" dodge. That's a favorite of Trump's: Everybody knows the election was rigged, etc.

      But you can't wiggle away that easily. You made a specific accusation: Somerby does not honor the experience of Holocaust survivors who came to the US or those Germans fleeing the Nazis who were refused entrance to the US. You can back that statement up; you can admit you made it up; or you can deflect with bullshit. Your choice.

      Delete
    5. See “Why we Watched: Europe, America and the Holocaust” by Theodore Hamerow. It is relevant context for our current dealings with Israel and neo-Nazi anti-semitism on the right (Stephen Miller).

      Delete
    6. Is Dogface saying Somerby supports immigration? I think that requires a quote.

      But the similarities between today’s immigrants and those in previous centuries is pretty obvious. Anne Frank was a saint who most Americans didn’t want to rescue. She died before Somerby was born but he shows no interest in today’s asylum seekers. We all read the same blog.

      Delete
    7. "Is Dogface saying Somerby supports immigration? I think that requires a quote."

      This is a transparent dodge. The subject is not what I said, it's what you said. Either support the quote you made; admit you made it up; or continue with your transparent deflections. I'll bet on the last choice, because I don't think you're honest enough to admit you made it up.

      Delete
    8. No one cares what you think. This is a run-around. If I post quotes you say they don’t say what they clearly do say. It is a waste of time. So fuck off.

      Delete
    9. Sure you did…

      Delete
    10. I really don't think DG is Somerby acting as his own biggest fan, but since Somerby's main point of this blog is that "anything is possible", I wouldn't bet on it.

      Delete
    11. Anything may be possible, but that doesn't mean anything is true.

      Delete
    12. Actually, I don't feel I'm defending Somerby at all. I'm defending truth. When someone states, for example, that Somerby doesn't honor the experience of Holocaust survivors who came to the US, that statement does not comport with my recollection of anything that Somerby has written, so I call that apparent falsehood out.

      If someone could show me where Somerby said that, I'd say, "You're right!" But when challenged, commenters here generally try to change the subject through various strategems of distraction rather than to directly support the statement they made.

      Delete
    13. "Actually, I don't feel I'm defending Somerby at all. I'm defending truth."

      Thanks for setting the record straight. I thought you were defending the propriety of being a pedantic annoyance.

      Delete
    14. Dogface, you are either Somerby or a paid troll. You are not any kind of Democrat. You are too lazy to go back and read what Somerby said, but that doesn't stop you from denying what the rest of us read.

      I have posted plenty of quotes but I am no longer a sucker. Whatever anyone posts quoting Somerby, you won't admit it says what we claim, so it is a waste of our time to do that. Meanwhile, you do not know what is true and should stop claiming your lack of info is setting anything straight.

      DG, you do not have the integrity to admit when Somerby has done what we claim.

      Most egregious, several of us here have asked why Somerby keeps saying creepy things about Anne Frank. You have no credible response. It is obvious that he not only does it, but keeps doing it, more frequently than ever. Along with Antonia. Fess up that this is weird and stop defending the guy.

      Delete
    15. Somerby says that Frank is a "sacred being." You find that "creepy." Does your reaction tell us more about you or about Somerby?

      Delete
    16. He also called her picture beautiful and worth the price of the book. She was not a sacred being. She was a young girl caught in a political tragedy, killed for being Jewish. That makes her little different than the young girls in other conflagrations worldwide. It is a tragedy but the word sacred is insulting, offensive. I find Somerby's focus on these 13 year olds, his gushing over them, majorly offensive because it is the kind of thing pedophiles do. And if he doesn't want to be considered a pedo, he needs to cut it out. It comes across as, at best, sarcasm or mockery. It is neither reverent nor sad. He is using their memory for his own purposes, whatever they may be, and he does not respect them or the sincere feelings we hold about the Holocaust and the need to never repeat what happened there. (Note that Somerby has never expressed concern over ICE atrocities or any other major violent tragedy in more recent history.) If Somerby does not know how to express that respect, he should shut the fuck up.

      Why mockery? Somerby does express some interest in topics followed by neo-Nazi bros who follow Fuentes, Groyper and white supremacist bro culture. The obsession with Ancient Troy and Greeks (Iliad) for one. But there are others too. His quotation of conservative and fascist poets (Yeats, e.e. cummings) and his odd quoting of My Antonia (another Nazi favorite) and his long-standing advocacy of child-marriage and revision of age-of-consent laws (see the essay on Bogey and Bacall for an example), also espoused by neo-Nazis and white supremacists concerned about the white birth rate.

      This is fringe stuff that Somerby coyly hints about, but there is too much in his references over time for this to be all accidental, a big coincidence. And then there is his abrupt shift rightward with Trump's entry into the presidential primary in 2015. There is a pattern of behavior that you do not acknowledge DG. I don't know if you are a right wing troll, a fellow traveler, or Somerby himself, but whatever you are, you are not on the right side of history.

      Delete
    17. "There is a pattern of behavior that you do not acknowledge DG."

      We agree on something. I think the "pattern" is a product of your fevered imagination.

      Delete
    18. I guess you're successfully trying to conceal the vast range of your wit.

      Delete
    19. Fuck off asshole.

      Delete
    20. There you go! You do have some range! (Or did your mom have to help you?)

      Delete
  10. "Our big Blue stars let this garbage. Our Blue stars, and our Blue orgs, just plainly don't seem to care [about Gutfeld calling Joy Behar a hippo]"

    Does Somerby seriously think we in Blue America are going to call for government interference in media, abrogation of first amendment rights under our constitution, suppression of an asshole like Gutfeld for being an asshole? We aren't the right wing. We believe in individual freedom, even to call an innocent woman an African animal. We don't believe in that.

    We on the left do not condone what Gutfeld is doing. We show our opposition by refusing to watch Fox News. Somerby should do the same, if he truly cares about Behar's right to be whatever weight she wants (her body, her choice). I do not speak for the blues or left (obviously), but it is entirely inconsistent for Somerby to call for whatever he thinks we are not doing. He doesn't say what he thinks we should do, so it is unclear what action he is advocating. I suppose he wants blue media to talk about Gutfeld's bad behavior 24/7. If we did that, there would be no time left to report actual news. I think it is more important to get the word out about other stuff. There are way too many obnoxious and ugly people on the right, for blue news to talk about them all. And it would get tedious pretty quickly. Somerby's repetitive nonsense here is already tedious itself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I doubt Behar cares what Gutfeld says about her.

      Delete
  11. Thanks to TV, people with a certain type of aura or presence are regarded as "Presidential." People without that aura are not. Unfortunately a leadership aura may not correlate with the characteristics we most need from a leader: judgement, intelligence, knowledge, motivation, goo work habits. Hillary had these valuable characteristics but lacked the aura.

    It's great for Mamdani that he comes across so well on TV, but he has so far shown no achievements that would measure his actual ability.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe he could start a war. That would get your respect, wouldn't it?

      Delete
    2. Yes, if Mamdani started a war against an evil enemy, who had been attacking us for decades, and defeated that enemy, that would earn my respect. However, given that his wife posted her appreciation of the Oct. 6 atrocities, I am fearful about who Mamdani would start a war with.

      Delete
    3. We are not at war with Gaza or the Palestinians. Mamdani is an American. You seem to be implying that American muslims have foreign alliances. That’s the accusation anti-semites tend to raise about Jews. That makes you bigoted in the same way.

      Delete
    4. Before the real life former actuary convinced me the Jewish faith's major tenet is ethnic cleansing of entire populations, I had respect for Jewish people.

      Delete
    5. Quaker in a BasementMarch 22, 2026 at 4:51 PM

      "...his wife posted her appreciation of the Oct. 6 atrocities..."

      This is too stupid to even look up. I'll just go with my gut and say this never happened.

      Delete
    6. I looked it up and you are right, it never happened.

      Delete
  12. "...another war in the Middle East, and that is not going well." Not going well? Of course, it's going well. In less than three weeks we destroyed the enemy's entire navy, air force, and air defenses. We destroyed 90% of their missiles, missile launchers and drones. We weakened their ability to manufacture weapons and killed many top leaders. With only a couple of dozen casualties on our side.

    Sadly, the left has such control over our media and institutions that they can present obvious falsehood and have them regarded as unquestionably true.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Go take a flying fuck, dickface

      Delete
    2. And yet our president is still demanding help (after saying it wasn't needed) from our allies (whom he neglected to consult before launching this war) by way of social media posts

      Yeah, man! It's going great!

      Delete
    3. If Trump wasn't such a huge anti-semite, he would have thrown Israel a victory parade.
      Of course, if Trump wasn't such a huge anti-semite he couldn't have possibly won the Republican Presidential primaries, in the first place.

      Delete
  13. Speaking of false statements that are treated as gospel, @10:36 wrote, "People are suffering today because of Trump." On the contrary most Americans are better off, because their wages grew faster than inflation, for the first time in several years. Also, they're paying less income tax. There is no especial suffering.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How many people are suffering compared to how many are better off? Saying there is no suffering at all is ridiculous and shows David is not a serious person.

      Delete
    2. "Also, they're paying less income tax."

      That's our DiC. Terrified at the prospect of deficits when it suits his purpose, but roots them on when it doesn't.

      Delete
    3. Yep, no “especial” suffering. Everybody has great, affordable healthcare, just like Trump promised them 10 years ago.

      Delete
    4. The midterms and ongoing approval ratings for Trump will tell us how well the US populace is doing. The fact that he does better with the elderly is in large part attributable to their support by what republicans call socialist programs.

      Delete
    5. The “Ive got mine, fuck you” mentality of the generation that has continually heaped burdens on their successors and done nothing about the major issues confronting this country, while supporting war after war and skyrocketing deficits is what is in process of ruining this country. The sooner they disappear the better.

      Delete
    6. I anticipate a big Dem victory in the mid term elections. Trump is totally focused on making the country a better place. The Dems are totally focused on demonizing Trump and winning the election. I expect both sides to get what they're working for.

      Delete
    7. Trump is totally focused on making the country a better place for Russian oligarchs.

      Fixed for accuracy.

      Delete
    8. You’re an imbecile, dickface. You think democrats want the country to continue suffering under trump? Every right wing accusation is a confession. That’s what you guys did yo Obama and Biden

      Delete
    9. @1:53 - The Dems are focused on resisting Trump rather than making people's lives better. That's why there are 3 hour lines at airport TSA.

      Delete
    10. Sure Dickhead

      Delete
    11. It’s just a coincidence that there’s been more government shutdown days under orange chickenshit than under all other presidents combined. Cause orange chickenshit is such a great deal maker. Fuck you, dickface

      Delete
    12. “Trump is totally focused on making the country a better place.”

      Yes, he only spends 60% of his focus on corruptly enriching himself and his family, 20% on going after his enemies, and another 20% on giving himself awards and commemorating himself. The rest of the time, sure, he focuses on making the country a better place.

      Delete
    13. "that's why there are 3 hour lines at airport TSA."

      There are 3 hour lines at airport TSA because the Democrats want to ensure ICE doesn't commit any more murders.

      Delete
    14. Resisting Trump is patriotic when Trump behaves like a crooked grifting cognitively impaired codger. Whose approval rating is tanking for good reason.

      Delete
    15. Trump raised taxes on many in the middle and upper middle class to then give a tax cut to rich people. Wages are not going up. Many are going to zero as we shed jobs.

      Foreign trolls like David are only here to trigger you with lies, best to ignore him and his lies.

      Delete
    16. Trump hates the same people I do (i.e. Republican voters and U.S. soldiers).

      Delete
    17. David in Cal,
      The United States of America could afford to feed, clothe, and house everyone in the entire world.

      Pro-tip:
      Don't let the people who hate America with a fiery passion, tell you otherwise.

      Delete
  14. "MAYOR MAMDANI: I think there's still a little poetry in the day-to-day. I think it's important that we don't let our imagination become constrained by what we are inheriting."

    Somerby just likes him because he mentioned poetry.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "... we'd rather see any such affliction portrayed as a deeply unfortunate (though dangerous) illness, not as a source of insult or denigration."

    Boo-fuckin'-hoo.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "The earnings gap between men and women slightly widened last year, according to a new analysis published Thursday.

    The left-leaning Economic Policy Institute calculated women last year earned 18.6% less than men per hour on average. That’s up slightly from 2024, when the wage gap narrowed slightly to 18%.

    The wage analysis, which examines several federal data sets and independent research papers, controls for race, ethnicity, education, age, marital status and geography.

    The findings were published ahead of Equal Pay Day on March 26, a symbolic date marking how far into 2026 women would have to work on top of their 2025 hours to match what men earned in 2025.

    The new analysis found the wage gap is smallest among lower-wage workers, in part because minimum wages create a uniform wage floor. But women are paid less than men across all education levels — women with a graduate degree on average earn less than men with only a college degree, it said.

    The analysis found the widest wage gap among Black and Hispanic women: Black women are paid only 68.3% of white men’s median wages. That’s a gap of $9.87 per hour — translating to roughly $20,500 lower annual earnings for a full-time worker. " [Colorado Newsline]

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Controlling for education based on degree level is not adequate. A PhD in women’s studies is not equal to a PhD in Nuclear Engineering.

      Delete
    2. Fuck off, dickface

      Delete
    3. David is saying that a man with a PhD in Women’s studies would be paid more.

      Delete
    4. Here, asshole troll DiC:
      “ Women Earned the Majority of Doctoral Degrees in 2020 for the 12th Straight Year and Outnumber Men in Grad School 148 to 100”

      https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/women-earned-the-majority-of-doctoral-degrees-in-2020-for-the-12th-straight-year-and-outnumber-men-in-grad-school-148-to-100/

      Why don’t you shut up sometimes and get some facts? Oh, I forgot, you’re a Trump worshipper.

      Delete
    5. David in Cal will say anything to make Jews look ridiculous.

      Delete
  17. In one week, people across the country will gather for No Kings rallies because the actions of this administration have crossed lines that cannot be ignored, minimized, or allowed to become normal.

    Over the past year, Republicans and Donald Trump have escalated their efforts to consolidate power, restrict who gets to vote, target vulnerable communities, and rewrite the rules ahead of the 2026 elections because they know their agenda is deeply unpopular and one they cannot win on.

    That is exactly why this moment demands a visible, collective response that cannot be ignored.

    Find a No Kings rally near you and make a plan to attend on March 28. >>

    https://www.mobilize.us/?tag_ids=29581&utm_source=peoplefortheamericanway

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Find a No Kings rally near you, that takes place Monday through Friday.
      The rich (who pay Congress) don't care what you do on your weekends.

      Delete
    2. The system is set-up so that if you have a problem (like say, the government harassing all non-white people), you need to make your problem the problem of rich people.
      You (with 50 thousand other people) do that by not showing up for work.
      By the next weekend, the Board members of your employer have called Congress, and told them to "cut the shit, or else".

      Delete
    3. We need a general strike but it will never happen in this country

      Delete
    4. TSA has sort of been on strike, given that they haven't been paid and are thus not going to work. It is hard to see how that has had any impact other than Trump sending ICE to screen passengers (without training). I suspect people don't see how a strike would put pressure on anyone, especially given that it would at best be partial.

      Delete
    5. A lot of them are going to work even though republicans don’t want to pay them until Dems agree to all conditions demanded of the new gestapo Orange king has generated

      Delete
  18. Trump, aside from his corruption and criminality, is a low performer with a high error rate, which partly explains why he often gets a pass in life.

    ReplyDelete
  19. “Trump has more plans for the ballroom in the East Wing than he does for the war in the Middle East.”

    ReplyDelete
  20. If Somerby is playing some personal joke with his over-the-top admiration of Anne Frank, it is in really bad taste. It is ugly to the point of exhibiting hatred of women and girls. Did a girl who looks like Anne reject him in youth? Or does he hate the girls in his last middle school classes? Did one of them get him fired? Is this elaborate sarcasm over the sacredness of young girls, attacking a martyr figure by reminding us all that she is dead? Who is he trying to hurt with this ongoing ugliness?

    DG, you know Somerby best. Ask him and let us know.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can’t have this all ways. Either he’s a pedophile or an asshole. It is clear he doesn’t believe in asylum for girls like Anne and her family or he would have mentioned it.

      Delete
    2. Bob and I were hanging out, having a few laughs and beers, so I asked him about what you said. He told me you two were well-meaning and harmless, just vicious and vindictive as hell because of your past difficulties with men.

      Delete
    3. 5:59 is one messed up human being.

      Delete
    4. More name-calling. Must be DG.

      Delete
    5. Dogface George,
      Who do you think you're fooling?
      Somerby would never, in a million years, actually take a real stand on something.

      Delete
    6. Really? He’s taken clear stands that Fox News is a vulgar propaganda outlet, and that Blue elites are scared to say much about that.

      I think the main problem is that Somerby is writing a blog about the media and the American discourse, and so many here are wanting a strident, left-leaning political blog.

      Delete
    7. Lawrence O’Donnell regularly calls Fox News the Fox propaganda network.

      Also, Somerby seems to restrict his Fox commentary to Gutfeld and the five, and then judges (ahem: judge not lest ye be judged anyone?) that it is cowardice that causes “blue” (whoops … mainstream) media not to … what? Report on these shows, one of which is ostensibly a comedy show and the other a talk/blather shows? What should the reporting be? That gutfeld called Joy behar a cow again? Really?

      Delete
    8. How courageous to say something so obvious!

      Somerby is not writing a blog about the media. Gutfeld is not the media. The shakeup at CBS is about the media. Crickets from Somerby about that. The right wing opinion writers at the NY Times are not what anyone would call American discourse.

      Here is Steve M. at No More Mister Nice Blog, discussing Jamelle Bouie's suggestion about the role of gender in right wing American discourse. It contains thoughtful ideas, not repetition of ugly Gutfeld jokes while blaming blue America for "looking away." Somerby is one of the only bloggers to discuss Blue American discourse without mentioning anything said by anyone blue.

      https://nomoremister.blogspot.com/2026/03/gender-insecurities-become-policy.html

      Delete
    9. “How courageous to say something so obvious.”

      Well, he also told us, well before it was obvious to us Blues, that Biden would be unable to mount a vigorous reelection campaign and that there was a big surge of illegal immigration during Biden’s term. For his trouble, he was lambasted by the usual suspects here as a Russian stooge and worse.

      Delete
    10. How observant to say something so obvious as Biden is old. It is ridiculous to say that a man who did such a good job as president couldn't have campaigned well. Shoving him aside was a huge mistake -- look at what is happening now with Trump, who is not only feeble but demented. Are you really patting Somerby on the back for this?

      So, you are the conservative who has been posting about the so-called big surge in immigration as the result of covid and blaming it on Biden, as evidence of his lack of concern for the border! You are no Democrat. You are a lying piece of shit pretending to be what you are not. Just like Somerby does and AC/MA and David in Cal.

      For the record, what is worse than being a Russian stooge? Being a Russian troll?

      Delete
    11. It is ridiculous, of course, to say that Biden could have campaigned well. He DID campaign and it was an epic and abject failure. But — believe what you will.

      Delete
    12. He had one bad debate. So did Obama but he wasn't run out of town because of it.

      Delete
    13. Sure, believe your stab-in-the-back rationalization if you find it soothing. Alternatively, you could simply admit that Somerby warned us, even in the face of an onslaught of vicious criticism, about something that turned out to be quite true.

      Delete
    14. Do you remember how many people warned republican voters to not nominate a reality tv lying sack of shit?

      Delete
    15. And Biden was such a bad campaigner (as opposed to being a really, really good president, imo) that he scared Dem leadership and donors into thinking that he would lose in a landslide to a reality tv lying sack of shit.

      Delete
    16. DG, I just mourn that we could have had another 4 years of excellent presidenting and we got Trump with his destruction instead. So many people are dead because you guys pushed Biden off the ticket. I hold you accountable, personally, for that huge mistake. This is on you and Somerby. If Biden had been reelected, Pretti and Good would be alive, we wouldn't have the persecution of immigrants, the TSA would be working, Musk would be building a better Tesla instead of fucking around, and we would have the Epstein answers, all of them. You are to blame for your part in this, along with Somerby.

      Delete
    17. Here's what scared Nancy Pelosi and other Dem donors -- Biden said he would raise taxes on the wealthy to 38%. Instead, Trump has destroyed our economy and is pushing us into a recession. But billionaires didn't want to pay their fair share. This isn't about Biden. It is about greed.

      Delete
    18. I remember when Biden first took office in 2021, within 3 months the media were saying we were already in a recession. It never happened and Biden was bringing us for a smooth landing. For his efforts the fucking people threw him out because the price of eggs was high. We’re a very stupid country.

      Delete
    19. When you guys were too delicate to vote for Biden, here is what you ushered in:

      "“Now with the death of Iran, the greatest enemy America has is the Radical Left, Highly Incompetent, Democrat Party!”

      — President Trump, on Truth Social."

      We had a proven leader who had just set the country on the right course after dealing with the covid pandemic. Our economy was "the envy of the world" but instead of looking at Trump and being scared shitless, some Democrats were manipulated into abandoning our nation to the clutches of the assholes who follow money wherever it leads.

      Any Democrat who couldn't get behind Biden owes the rest of us an apology. Big time! I don't want to be associated with those of you who gave us Trump. You are too stupid to walk this earth without a keeper. You deserve what Trump has done to our nation. The rest of us do not.

      Delete
    20. Trump is too old, and his associates are too evil. Think about that before you claim that Newsom needs to tweak his campaign promises before you'll support him.

      Delete
    21. "I hold you accountable, personally, for that huge mistake."

      That's right. I personally stabbed Biden in the back, leading inexorably to the downfall of the world! HA-HA! HA-HA! HA-HAAAAA!!!!!

      You feel that Biden would have won if I had not pushed him off the ticket. I, on the other hand, feel that Biden would have lost in a landslide, and Repubs would have taken over the House and Senate by huge, possibly filibuster-proof majorities, and that Dems would have had no real hope of ever retaking them for years or, possibly, decades, meaning that a super-solid majority of the Supreme Court justices would be Red zealots for the rest of our lifetimes.

      Our difference in opinion rests on what we think would have happened if Biden had remained on the ticket.

      Delete
    22. Biden himself feels he would have won. There are many Democrats who agree, largely due to the lack of turnout on the left after disillusionment with the way Biden was treated, and the rejection of Harris.

      There was no indication of a landslide brewing until the NYT and Republicans ginned up the "Biden is too old campaign" aided by Russia-produced deep fake videos promoted by the Washington Post. The lack of push back against this swiftboating is what cost Dems the election. YOU and Somerby aided that. You should be ashamed and express some chagrin over what has happened since. At least the rest of us tried to keep Trump out of office. You guys ushered him in. I do not forgive you.

      Delete
    23. "There was no indication of a landslide brewing until . . . ."

      I guess that's your way of acknowledging that there was a landslide brewing.

      Delete
    24. I am acknowledging that, without pushback, the Biden is too old campaign was effective at getting Biden removed from his own nomination (after he had already won it by winning primaries and was the party's official nominee). That never should have happened.

      Campaigns have not been the same since 2015 when Russia and billionaires funded Trump's social media efforts, flooding Facebook and other spaces with propaganda. Other Russian efforts included using polling data to identify specific precincts vulnerable to phone calls and media efforts to suppress black voting and promote 3rd party candidates such as Jill Stein. Entire campaigns by third party candidates were funded by Russia and billionaire donors, to interfere in primaries and in voting. That is why Clinton lost in those Blue wall states (which she did visit, contrary to smears).

      Russia funding and interference, including Wikileaks publication of stolen emails constituted illegal interference in the 2016 election. Covid made the 2020 election unusual, but the right was back with its Russia-funded bots and social media targeting of vulnerable groups (black and disaffected Democrats) and its "Biden is too old" videos and memes, to effectively suppress voting in 2024. There was no "landlside" brewing but a coordinated attack on Biden, as the most effective threat to Trump, organized and funded by billionaires like Musk and Thiel, and Russia-provided social media assistance. It was illegal and wrong.

      For you to pretend that 2024 actually reflected voters opinions is outrageous. Giving Harris 3 months to campaign against major media saying he was avoiding interviews and slept her way to the top, shows no understanding of what actually happened. And no, there was no landslide brewing, given that even with all the cheating, the election was exceptionally close. That you use the word landslide suggests you are listening to conservatives talk, when under the worst possible circumstances Harris still almost won.

      This is not how American elections are supposed to work. The lack of prosecution for Trump after his crimes in 2015 is part of the problem. The interference by Russia is treason on the part of Trump, but what else is new? He has been doing Putin's dirty work ever since they recruited him.

      I dislike you DG because you are either one of these bad guys or too stupid to know you are being used. I suspect you are paid, like Somerby. But the evil being done these days makes you pure scum regardless. There may possibly be someone who reads Somerby and doesn't know what is happening and that is the only reason I bother to dispute anything you say.

      I want my country back. Trump will die eventually and his supporters will come to their senses and we will be able to return to being a democracy again.

      Delete
    25. You are so perceptive: I'm a paid, stupid, bad guy who doesn't know what's happening -- pure scum indeed. Don't you feel so much better getting that off your chest? Smiting the Evil Other is such a liberating feelling! Go forth with your flaming sword of righteousness and bring Peace and Joy to a Grateful Nation!

      Delete
    26. Isn't it about time for you folks to start lecturing me about civility again?

      Delete
  21. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Q: What's the difference between Nick Fuentes and the Hindenberg?

    A: One's a flaming Nazi gasbag, and the other is just a dirigible.
    😎

    ReplyDelete
  23. Jon Stewart has recently offered up a smart analysis of how the media plays to Trump's benefit by aggregating his absolutely batshit crazy blatherings. He is possibly the best at media analysis. Back in the day, when he was regularly on the Daily Show, he adroitly roasted the clowns over at Fox, often by juxtaposing clips of their content that showed their hypocrisy. Regularly meandering into Anne Frank territory is not on point for anyone who wants to engage in serious media criticism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not a Bob-whisperer, like Dogface George, but even I know Somerby could totally roast the clowns on Fox if he ever wanted to.

      Delete
  24. It has to be said and Tiedrich says it right:

    "Donny Convict is cordially invited to fuck off.

    no, seriously. fuck straight off, Donny. fuck all the way off. start fucking off over here, and then just fuck yourself all the way over to there — and then keep on going, until you’ve fucked yourself right to the very edge of the universe.

    and when you get there, eat the bowl of fuck that’s waiting for you.

    there are no words to adequately describe just much of a repulsive little spite-fueled homunculus Donny is."

    ReplyDelete
  25. Bob praises Mamdani's elusive quality of showing real presidential timber on TV. This is a critical skill if he ever auditions for the new version of West Wing. However, a Mayor or any executive must deal with real world problems. For Mamdani, bond ratings are a current problem. Moody’s Ratings this week revised its outlook on New York City to "negative" from "stable." How will he keep NYC's borrowing costs from escalating? He cannot solve this problem by just looking Presidential on TV.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hahahahaha. You concern yourself with NYC bond ratings while your idol and his enablers devalue the dollar and massively escalate the national debt. Which you never comment on. The biggest threat to this country is economic but you rave about a costly war over a threat to this country that is minuscule, if it exists at all. The Chinese are laughing at us.

      Delete
  26. A victory for Trump and every American. (Even a victory for the ungrateful TDS folks.)
    Over 20 Nations Announce Readiness to Help Open Strait of Hormuz

    More than 20 nations spanning from Asia to Europe to the Gulf have expressed a “readiness to contribute” to the effort of opening up the Strait of Hormuz amid threats to ships by the Islamist regime in Iran.

    In a joint statement released on Saturday morning, the nations of Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Republic of Korea, Romania, Slovenia, Sweden, United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom condemned in the “strongest terms” the recent attacks by Iran against unarmed, civilian shipping vessels, its attacks on oil and gas infrastructure throughout the Gulf, and its move to shut down traffic in the Strait of Hormuz.

    “We express our deep concern about the escalating conflict. We call on Iran to cease immediately its threats, laying of mines, drone and missile attacks and other attempts to block the Strait to commercial shipping, and to comply with UN Security Council Resolution 2817,” the group of nations said.

    “Freedom of navigation is a fundamental principle of international law, including under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The effects of Iran’s actions will be felt by people in all parts of the world, especially the most vulnerable.”

    “We emphasise that such interference with international shipping and the disruption of global energy supply chains constitute a threat to international peace and security. In this regard, we call for an immediate comprehensive moratorium on attacks on civilian infrastructure, including oil and gas installations,” they continued.

    “We express our readiness to contribute to appropriate efforts to ensure safe passage through the Strait. We welcome the commitment of nations who are engaging in preparatory planning.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is the word for people who praise everything Trump does? Let’s say TLS:Trump lickspittle syndrome.

      Delete
    2. Preparatory planning. Bwahahaha!!

      Fuck you, dickface.

      Delete
    3. 'Readiness to contribute.' 'Appropriate efforts.' 'Preparatory planning.' Condemnation of behavior 'in the strongest terms'

      Truly my heart trembles at the awful might such phrases will soon inflict on the evildoers.

      Let no straw remain ungrasped.

      Delete
    4. Fair point, Hector. Time will tell how much help these countries actually provide. Still, a few days ago these countries were saying they would not help with the the Strait. Now they're saying they will help. That's a step forward.

      I wonder what the European leaders are thinking now that Iran has shown that its missiles can reach Europe. Are they grateful to Trump for helping to prevent them from being at risk of Iranian nuclear tipped missiles? Are they resentful at being dragged into a war? Do they wish their militaries were stronger?

      Delete
    5. DiC, you can use this thing called the internet to find out what European leaders are thinking. And no, they’re not happy that Trump and Netanyahu have provoked Iran into lashing out.

      Delete
    6. And why would Iran aim nuclear missiles at Europe unless they declared themselves enemies to Iran? You can’t even grasp simple logic.

      Delete
    7. 2:30: Dickface has a good answer for your question, he says it’s because Iran is suicidal so we must kill them all to save them from themselves

      Delete
    8. @2:30 - Why would Iran threaten Europe with nuclear missiles? For any reason they felt like. There's an ∞ of conceivable things they might feel like doing. Look at how they treat their own population. They might decide to treat Europeans as badly or worse. Use your imagination.

      Delete
    9. That is one of the stupidest comments coming off your keyboard ever.

      Delete
    10. And that's saying something.

      Delete
    11. 3:13, it’s ok, dickface is shameless. Tomorrow he’ll exceed the stupidity

      Delete
    12. Quaker in a BasementMarch 22, 2026 at 4:14 PM

      "Use your imagination."

      There's a basis for a sound foreign policy.

      Delete
  27. Anyone paying attention to the genocide we’re committing in Cuba?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obviously, few are. We're swept away by the flood of horrible things happening and we can't seem to keep track of each and every one, can we?

      Delete
    2. It’s horrific and criminal. People are forced to queue up potable water.

      For my entire life the politics in this country has been twisted and warped by the Cuban exile community

      Delete
    3. Wehn you're right, you're right. Did you see that the American Embassy in Havana had the brass balls to ask Cuba for permission to import diesel fuel for its generators because of the blackout?

      Delete
  28. "President Trump's shocking post celebrating the death of former FBI Director Robert Mueller has not received a single on-air mention over at Fox News." [Mediaite]

    ReplyDelete
  29. I guess they're in a silo over there.

    More generally, If I were to critique Somerby's silo theory, I'd say that the Red silo produces propaganda while the Blue silo produces journalism. They are silos only because of self-segregation by the audience. Reds go to Fox, Blues go to the NYT, etc. Fox caters to Reds, but the NYT thinks of itself as producing straight journalism, not as catering to Blues.

    Some here criticize Somerby for calling it "Blue media" when its mission is fundamentaly different from Fox's. It's "mainstream media that only Blues consume" is closer to what I think Somerby means.

    (And to forestall quibbles - of course some Reds read the NYT, et al. But most are glued to Fox.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The NYT is not part of blue journalism. It is legacy mainstream media now own by billionaire oligarchs who are conservative. The NYT was majorly biased against Democrats and Biden, Harris, Clinton in previous elections. Calling it blue is a mistake that calls into question your own motives. What is blue media? Now it is independent media.

      It is not true that only blues consume mainstream media. Somerby clearly reads it and conservatives tend to read the opinions pieces by conservative writers. That is why they are there. Beyond that, I believe many non-voters and independents also read the legacy media. If Somerby thinks that only blues consider mainstream media, he is incorrect.

      Being "glued to Fox" does not preclude also being glued to podcasts and other conservative sources, such as Newsmax, OAN, CBS (now) and independent conservative sources.

      Places like Ground News and the Ad Fontes Media Bias Chart will show you the much wider variety of sources red by both the left and right. Just because Somerby never mentions these, does not mean they exist. Somerby himself has been pushing Mediaite, for example.

      Delete
    2. red = read in last paragraph
      exist = do not exist (words " do not" omitted)

      Delete
    3. DG gets this wrong because Somerby has it wrong. He is either Somerby or pushing Somerby's views.

      Delete
    4. The huge left slant of the NYT was shown when they asked an editor to run a column with a conservative pov. The editor chose a column by Senator Cotton. It was not terribly conservative. I think a majority of Americans might agree with it. But, the Times is so far left that they fired this editor. Even though he had been told to run a conservative op ed.

      Delete
    5. What an odd slanted view of what happened. The editor was fired for not reading the editorial before approving its publication, by his own admission. The editorial called for using the military to quell civil protest. Bennet resigned. The context was police brutality that killed George Floyd. I doubt a majority would agree with that illegal use of the military.

      Delete
    6. The right doesn't care how it abridges 1st amendment rights of protesters:

      "Former FBI agents are suing bureau head Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi, alleging that they were unjustly fired for kneeling during a racial justice protest in 2020.

      The suit, filed on Monday by the Washington Litigation Group on behalf of the 12 agents, names Patel, Bondi, the Justice Department, the FBI and the Executive Office of the President as defendants responsible for the agents’ “unlawful terminations.”

      The defendants violated the agents’ First and Fifth Amendment rights after internal reviews by the FBI cleared of wrongdoing the agents, who at one protest “avoided triggering violence by assuming a kneeling posture associated with de-escalations between law enforcement officers and their communities,” the complaint asserts."

      Delete
    7. I am old enough to remember when Patel and Bondi both testified at their confirmation hearings that they in no way had an enemies list

      Delete
    8. More fractured fairy tales from dickface

      Delete
    9. From Politico:
      Armed with extensive email correspondence and verbatim quotations from his final days at the Times, Bennet accuses the Times’ leadership — especially publisher A.G. Sulzberger and former executive editor Dean Baquet — of betraying him in the heat of the controversy over Cotton’s op-ed, which called on then-President Donald Trump to use the military to suppress violent protests and looting during the Black Lives Matter protests in the summer of 2020.

      Bennet recounts that Baquet was at first “taken aback” by the mounting criticism of the piece in the days after its publication, even going so far as to ask Bennet, “Are we truly so precious?” (“The answer, it turns out, was yes,” Bennet writes.)


      Read the whole thing at https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/14/james-bennet-nyt-firing-00131826

      Delete
    10. Fuck Baquet. He single-handedly went a jihad against President Clinton. Go fuck yourself, dickface, you whiney little fascist freak

      Delete
  30. Op-ed writers on both sides are writing columns forecasting the results in Iran, with reasoning based on what happened in some other, different situations. The anti-Trump side points to the quagmires in Iraq and Afghanistan. The pro-Trump side points to the Allies' failure to stop Hitler earlier, thus saving tens of millions of lives.

    If the US and Israel do succeed in preventing Iran from getting an arsenal of nuclear weapons, there will be no way to prove what would have happened if Iran had been left alone. One side can continue to claim that the war was unnecessary. The other side will continue to claim that Trump prevented WW3.

    ReplyDelete