FRIDAY, MARCH 6, 2026
She said it not once, but twice: It's been said that Plato wrote it, if only in translation:
"When I saw all this, and other things as bad, I was disgusted and withdrew from the wickedness of the times."
As we've frequently noted, Plato is said to have written that in the Seventh Letter, which may or not be authentic. Having said that, also this:
The lunacy of the current times was on display this week as Secretary Noem was shown the door. Regarding Secretary Noem herself, we'll make these brief observations:
Her refusal to Go Full Bondi: To her credit, she didn't Go Full Bondi during this week's congressional hearings. In fact, she didn't imitate Bondi at all. By possible way of contrast:
It's our impression that Senator Tillis (R-NC) is a good, decent person. But in his shouted inquisition about the way Noem once shot her puppy and also a goat, we thought he captured the craziness of the times during the first of the week's two hearings.
Of all the things Noem had done or had possibly done in office, he was shouting at her about that!
Insinuate, insinuate: In our view, Lawrence O'Donnell almost seemed to follow suit on Wednesday night's Last Word. On three separate occasions during the hour, he teased an upcoming discussion of a question he seemed quite eager to discuss—the question of whether Secretary Noem and Corey Lewandoski have been engaged in a sexual relationship.
He also offered an additional tease, this time (did he actually do it twice?) about "one of the most famous flying bedrooms since Jeffrey Epstein was grounded."
Just this once, we'll be honest. We don't especially care whether Noem and Lewandoski been so engaged. That said, after explicitly teasing Jeremy Raskin as the guest who would he discussing that topic, Lawrence never said a single word to Raskin about this thrilling question.
"Simplify, simplify," Thoreau once said. In the case of Lawrence's unfortunate outing, it was more like this:
"Insinuate, insinuate," especially about matters of sex.
The collection of scholars on The Five have been playing this game in the past week with respect to the Clintons. Backsliding into one of his unhelpful days—they've been very rare in recent years—Lawrence followed suit on Wednesday night. He was absent last night.
Costuming issues: It's been said that it was the massive cost of the Mount Rushmore ads which helped seal Noem's fate. In that instance, Secretary Noem had decked herself out, in some of the shots, as a wild west buffalo driver.
For our money, her most egregious costuming decision involved the pose she struck before a crowded cell full of half-naked male prisoners in the early El Salvador days.
As of this morning, the New York Times was still pretending that it was Noem's expensive watch which made those visuals so inappropriate. Do we Blues have any sexual politics at all? We're forced to suggest that, rather plainly, it was actually something else.
In search of "domestic terrorists:" We'll guess that it wasn't Noem who invented the mandated practice of referring to DHS shooting victims as "domestic terrorists." We'll guess that that rhetorical lunacy came from Stephen Miller, although that's merely a guess.
Last fall, when Marimar Martinez was shot five times in Chicago, she too was instantly called a "domestic terrorist," even way back then. That was long before Noem made herself famous by attaching that insane designation to Renee Good and Alex Pretti, the victims of fatal shootings in Minneapolis this year.
We'll guess that Noem was trying to stick to a pre-arranged messaging diktat. In the case of those fatal Minneapolis shootings, she instantly did so, in a way which took us toward the limits of previously known human dumbness.
The lunacy of the times has been on vivid display in these varied events. That general lunacy was part of the surroundings last week as we the people were moving toward our ongoing war in Iran.
We don't know how that war will turn out; we can imagine it flat or round. That said, the most puzzling episode in Noem's term was revisited a few weeks back.
They picked it up at Mediate. We saw it reported nowhere else. The lunacy of the times is lurking here. Michael Luciano's report started off like this:
Trump Official Disputes Kristi Noem’s Claim About ‘Cannibal’ Who ‘Tried to Eat Himself’ While in Custody
A wild tale about an undocumented immigrant told by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem “is completely false,” a senior federal law enforcement official told The Intercept for a story published on Monday.
Back in June, Noem went on Fox News and claimed that a U.S. marshal told her about a particularly bizarre deportation flight.
“I was talking to a U.S. marshal just yesterday, and he was talking about deporting a plane load of illegals, and one of them was a cannibal,” she said at the time. “He started to eat his own arms. He was such a deranged individual. This is the kind of people President Trump is getting off our streets.”
It's true! Inexplicably, Noem repeated that extremely strange tale during an appearance on Jesse Watters Primetime. How odd was her second-hand story about the cannibal who tried to eat his own arm, presumably as a means of escape?
It was so odd that it even seemed to give Watters pause!
What could explain the fact that a major federal official had gone on the nation's second most-watched "cable news" show and had repeated this "wild tale"—had seemed to believe that this crazy tale actually seemed to make some sort of sense?
We don't know how to answer that question—but a few days later, Noem repeated the same story with the president at her side. She did so at the high-profile, televised unveiling of the infamous "Alligator Alcatraz" detention site in the Florida Everglades.
A detainee had tried to eat his own arm, presumably as a means of escape! In what world does a major official repeat such a lunatic tale—and not just on one occasion, but in two major settings?
What can possibly explain the fact that Secretary Noem did that?
We reported those bizarre remarks by Noem in real time, when the remarks were made. In another peculiar sign of the times, the major news orgs of Blue America yawned and looked away.
A cannibal tried to eat his own arm! She said it not once, but twice!
In conclusion, we'll offer this:
Kristi Noem has to be better than this. We hope she ends up showing it.
Also, we don't believe in piling on people at times like these—for example, by nosing around about their sexual behavior. The lunacy of the current time really does start at the top—and for the record, we've long suggested that you should pity the child who became that powerful, dangerous man.
We've repeatedly praised O'Donnell of late. On Wednesday, we'd say he briefly crashed and burned, along with one or two guests.
“Kristi Noem has to be better than this.” Really, Bob? Do you have any empirical evidence?
ReplyDeleteUmm, her boss just fired her, Capeesh?
DeleteCredit to DiC for telling us that Trump would not be able to sustain the Biden Boom! The shockingly abysmal jobs report -- 97K jobs lost in Feb -- proves his point!
ReplyDeleteUnder Biden -- peace and prosperity. Under Trump -- war and want.
DeleteExcuse me: 92K jobs lost in Feb, not 97K.
DeleteThe number of far right wing blogs that DiC goes to for his opinions is shrinking by the day. At this rate he will be talking to himself in short order.
DeleteInvading Cuba would be a good practice for going after Greenland. And the trolls here would be applauding both.
DeleteBy 2:05, I mean the number of far right wing blogs that support Trump are shrinking daily.
DeleteBob says to not focus on Noem's behavior in killing animals and cheating on her husband with a known abuser, but instead to focus on Noem's story about a cannibal, which Bob seems to delight in retelling in great detail.
ReplyDeleteLordy, Bob is out of touch.
As a Republican I am proud that my leaders handwave credible accusations of sexual assaults (Trump, Hegseth, etc) and instead chest thump about bombing schoolchildren and hospitals around the world.
ReplyDeleteTrue, we Republicans are bloodthirsty people, but sometimes, after engaging in some manly war activities, we have to blow off some steam, and hey, we know how to have a *good time* with the females (consent/age be damned).
Hmm...you make a compelling case for joining the Republican party.
DeleteIf someone will mistreat a puppy the way Noem did, she will mistreat human beings too, including elderly, sick, disabled, children and pregnant women. She also mistreats citizens and doesn't care who she deports. She condones her agents shooting protesters in the face and back. That is why the puppy-killing incident is important. Trump knew who and what she was before he appointed her.
ReplyDeleteSomerby's pretense that the outrage over the way she killed an innocent dog doesn't matter shows that Somerby doesn't understand basic human decency himself. No one should have to explain to Somerby why the puppy's death mattered to Congress. But Somerby isn't very good at interpreting symbolism or recognizing analogies. He thinks Plato is relevant here when that quote has nothing whatsoever to do with anything he goes on to discuss.
The affair with Corey (which both he and Noem are married) matters because it is taking place in a love-nest consisting of a luxury jet purchased and maintained at taxpayer expense. No one cares who she sleeps with, but it does matter that she is essentially embezzling DHS funds to carry on her affair with a subordinate on her staff. That is corrupt in several ways. That Somerby doesn't recognize or care about this kind of corruption suggests he is Republican to the core. Those are the people who don't care when their officials do or how much they graft, not Democrats, who expect accountability, even from known puppy killers.
Somerby has an odd notion that it is somehow virtuous to ignore other people's wrongdoing, even when they are elected officials.
ReplyDeleteSomerby thinks there are insinuations about sex concerning Noem and Lewandowski. No. There are facts about an affair between them that is inappropriate because she is his supervisor and they are using federal property to conduct their sexual activities.
ReplyDeleteInsinuate refers to the circumspect language being used to describe their activities. That is to avoid being crude or clinical or explicit when there is no doubt about the details of their sexual activities. It is not to suggest that something is happening that isn't obvious to everyone around them.
But Somerby will not even call an obvious lie, a lie. So he isn't going to call an obvious affair, an affair either. Maybe he thinks that if no one talks about it out loud, all can pretend it isn't happening. Life doesn't work that way. And no, these people are not being maligned when others call out their inappropriate behavior. They are not the victims. The public who pays their salaries is the victim and these two miscreants (Kristi and Corey) are the wrongdoers.
Juxtaposing this situation with the deaths of the innocent people shot by ICE is obscene. It angers me every time Somerby pulls this shit. Somerby is morally bankrupt. That makes him a right winger as surely as any ID card he carries in his wallet or red hat hanging in his closet.
This is important news today. Crickets from Somerby about it.
ReplyDelete“Let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be.”
According to an interview with a woman conducted by the FBI as part of an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, those were some of the first words Donald Trump directed at her before he began a sexual assault that ended with Trump reportedly hitting her and pulling her hair.
Overshadowed by Thursday's firing of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, the Department of Justice quietly released previously missing FBI interviews with an Epstein victim whose explosive allegations have sent shockwaves through Washington.
According to Politico, the unidentified woman alleged she was a teenager when Epstein introduced her to Trump.
In files dated between August and October 2019, the woman—whose name is redacted—claims that when she was between 13 and 15 years old, Epstein took her to either New York or New Jersey. In "a very tall building with huge rooms," he introduced her to Trump. Trump, she said, "didn't like that I was a boy-girl," which interview notes interpreted to mean tomboy.
According to the woman's account, other people were present initially, but she could not recall who they were. Trump asked them to leave the room, then said "something to the effect of, 'Let me teach you how little girls are supposed to be,'" according to the interview notes. Trump then unzipped his pants and placed her head "down to his penis," she recalled. She said she "bit the s--- out of it." He then pulled her hair and punched her on the side of her head, she stated.
"Get this little b---- the hell out of here," the woman recalled him saying. At that point, others reentered the room. The FBI interviews contain no information about how the incident concluded or how the woman left the encounter."
Why hasn't Trump been impeached and prosecuted? This is illegal behavior for any man, much less our president.