WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 2026
The stigma of "mental illness:" Is this country currently dealing with an unfortunate but dangerous situation involving some form of "mental illness?"
Last Thursday night, on CNN, Mary L. Trump said yes. Back in 2020, she had offered similar thoughts about a presidential candidate in her best-selling family memoir, Too Much and Never Enough.
Before that, back in 2017, the Yale psychiatrist Bandy X. Lee had edited a collection of essays in which, correctly or otherwise, various medical specialists addressed the same set of concerns. Her book was a best-seller too. Her thumbnail reads like this:
Bandy X. Lee
Bandy Xenobia Lee is an American psychiatrist whose scholarly work includes a textbook on violence. She is a specialist in public health approaches to violence prevention who consulted with the World Health Organization and initiated reforms at New York's Rikers Island Correctional Facility. She helped draft the United Nations chapter on "Violence Against Children" leads a project group for the WHO's Violence Prevention Alliance, and has contributed to prison reform in the United States and around the world. She taught at Yale School of Medicine and Yale Law School from 2003 to 2020.
Unfortunately, yes! In 2020, she ended up losing her position at Yale. Wisely or otherwise, Dr. Lee had been breaking the rules.
The rules still say that issues of mental illness, disorder or health may not be brought across the borders which limit the reach of the American political discourse. Journalists have religiously followed that rule ever since (roughly) the 1960s, except during brief periods when the MSM decided they wanted to question the mental health of Candidate Al Gore.
(In such ways, they managed to drag Candidate Bush across the finish line. That story has never been told by major mainstream orgs, because that's the way games are played.)
Just a guess! It's largely the stigma associated with "mental illness" that has helped keep that rule firmly in place. Presumably, that stigma also lies behind this reported change in preferred language in this arena, as reported by the leading authority on such terminology:
Mental disorder
A mental disorder, also referred to as a mental illness, a mental health condition, or a psychiatric disability, is a behavioral or mental pattern that causes significant distress or impairment of personal functioning. A mental disorder is also characterized by a clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotional regulation, or behavior, often in a social context. Such disturbances may occur as single episodes, may be persistent, or may be relapsing–remitting. There are many different types of mental disorders, with signs and symptoms that vary widely between specific disorders. A mental disorder is one aspect of mental health.
[....]
Most international clinical documents use the term mental "disorder," while "illness" is also common. It has been noted that using the term "mental" (i.e., of the mind) is not necessarily meant to imply separateness from the brain or body.
And so on, at enormous length from there.
Stigma is as stigma does, Mother Gump always said—and in the area of "mental illness," stigma can do great harm. For that reason, one of those annoying Euro nations has undertaken a program described by the New York Times in a lengthy report which carries this dual headline:
A Danish Program Takes On the Stigma of Mental Illness
One of Us, run by Denmark’s health ministry, works with people with mental health conditions to share their stories in schools, hospitals and police stations, helping turn fear into understanding.
In his report, Simar Bajaj uses a variety of terms—mental illness, mental disorders, mental health challenges. He mainly deals with people suffering from the ravages of schizophrenia—people who understand, acknowledge and know that, through no fault of their own, they're afflicted with a very difficult mental health condition and challenge.
One such person is Giuseppe Parlatore. Here's part of his role in Denmark's undertaking:
For years after he was diagnosed in 2009, Mr. Parlatore, 42, felt like schizophrenia had swallowed him up, leaving him “more or less a vegetable,” he said. But he has worked hard to manage the voices he hears—making deals, setting boundaries—and to carve out a life beyond his illness.
Today he is one of Denmark’s leading mental health advocates, working with the country’s top health officials to change how the public sees mental illness.
This government initiative, called One of Us, works with people who have mental health challenges—the program calls them ambassadors—to share their stories in schools, hospitals and police stations, with a focus on their recovery.
Why would Parlatore be sharing his story in police stations? Hopefully, so police officers can learn better ways of dealing with the occasional situation in which some person may be responding to their interventions in ways they don't understand and may mistakenly see as threatening.
None of this directly relates to the situation Mary Trump and Bandy X. Lee have said we're currently facing. For today, we'll leave you with a supposition:
People who are "mentally ill" (OldSpeak) didn't choose to be so afflicted.
Some such people know they have a serious "illness" with which they must learn to deal. Depending on the specific condition in question, many other afflicted people one hundred percent do not.
"No people are uninteresting," the poet once said. He gave it voice all the way down.
Look at David showing his ass before the election. What a creep.:
ReplyDeleteDavid in CalOctober 27, 2024 at 3:25 PM
Today's NYTimes Review section today has a big, main headline saying that Trump threatens to prosecute his political opponents. This is misleading, because he threatened to prosecute his political opponents if they cheat in the election.
Misleading political coverage makes me sad, but particularly when it's the NYTimes. I've been reading the Times for 70 years. Their decline into misleading partisanship is a tragedy.
I got my hopes up that it meant prosecuting them in general for being Democrats. Bummer.
DeleteTrump is not prosecuting his political opponents such as Obama, Biden, Harris, Walz, Pelosi, Schumer. Dishonest judges and prosecutors who appear to have broken the law in an effort to get Trump are being investigated.
DeleteWho and how did they break the law you fuckface liar? You got nothing but bullshit.
DeleteTrump’s campaign of retribution:
DeleteAt least 470 targets and counting
Reuters documented at least 470 targets of retribution under Trump’s leadership – from federal employees and prosecutors to universities and media outlets. The list illuminates the sweeping effort by the president and his administration to punish dissent and reshape the government.
By PETER EISLER, NED PARKER, LINDA SO and JOSEPH TANFANI Filed Nov. 26, 2025, 11 a.m. GMT
"Dishonest judges and prosecutors who appear to have broken the law in an effort to get Trump are being investigated."
DeleteYou left out all those "dishonest" jurors serving on the grand juries and civil trials. Shouldn't Trump investigate them, especially that aside from covering up the Epstein files, the DOJ's (and the FBI's) other apparent function is to serve his vengeful whims?
The main reason Trump prosecutions of opponents is not having a bigger impact is they are so fucking incompetent:
Delete"The autopen investigation was led by the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, which is run by a longtime Trump ally, Jeanine Pirro. The inquiry was quietly shelved in recent months, around the time that prosecutors under Ms. Pirro sought and failed to secure an indictment in a different case: one against six Democratic lawmakers who posted a video in the fall that enraged Mr. Trump by reminding active-duty members of the military and intelligence community that they were obligated to refuse to follow illegal orders."
The Wino also fucked up the indictment on the sandwich thrower. Maybe don't hire Fox News idiots to do the Governments work. Talk about DEI hires. What a bunch of maroons.
Need to learn about Mary Trump's analysis of the latest actions in Iran and what comes next.
ReplyDeleteAl Gore is weird and psychologically unfit for the presidency.
ReplyDeleteHis balls are tanned and rested!
DeleteTrump tweet, 10/9/2012:
ReplyDelete“Now that President Obama’s poll numbers are in tail spin, watch for him to launch a strike on Libya or Iran. He’s desperate."
Trump tweet, November 2013:
“Remember I predicted a long time ago, President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly, not skilled.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Nc9R-NqEmM
right around the 10:30 mark.
Thank you for the link to the Yevtushenko poem.
ReplyDeleteTrump, 3/3: "...we were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. They were going to attack. If we didn't do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that.”
ReplyDeleteSo here’s what our President is telling us:
The US had assembled a massive military force aimed at Iran, powerful enough that it was clear we would quickly take control of the Persian Gulf as well as the air space over Iran. We could then bomb them at will from the air and sea.
Iran, though knowing it would most likely be wiped out if a conflict broke out, was about to provoke a conflict by launching an attack on the US while negotiations were ongoing. Fortunately, the always prescient Trump intervened to avert catastrophe.
Thank you President Trump.
Trump's comment alludes to the exact time that the attacks would begin. As Trump said over and over, he decided to attack because Iran would not give up building nuclear weapons.
DeleteYes, Trump's comment refers to the exact time of the attack. It also makes zero sense.
DeleteIts senselessness seems further confirmation that Israel is the senior partner in this endeavor and I think it would save time, as a previous commenter astutely observed, if we would direct further inquiries about the timing of the attack directly to President Netanyahu.
David in Cal,
DeleteYou have a lot of nerve coming here in a few months to argue it's not the federal government's job to protect Americans from being killed by terrorists.
Hector, you may be right, but IMO the points you raise are minor. Looked at more broadly, Iraq refused to stop building nuclear weapons, so Trump attacked. Israel worked jointly with the US in a way that benefits both countries.
DeleteDestroying nuclear capability, according to Trump and his cheerleaders, took one day last year. Now it didn't, apparently. So how many days should it take? Three at most would be a liberal guess. So now we are shooting down 20,000 dollar drones with 1-3 million dollar anti aircraft missiles. Regime change will not happen without 500,000 boots on the ground according to Gen. Petraeus. So what are we doing in a country of 93 million for upwards of a month except potentially exhausting our arsenal and spending billions of dollars? Not to mention the US lives that Trump glibly concedes will be lost. This was not thought out, Netanyahu was the trigger for it according to the secretary of state, and many are saying that this conflict conveniently distracts from credible accounts in the WSJ, NYT, and NPR that Trump raped teenagers. There is zero reason for this country to be engaged in this war. Mission accomplished was the mantra after the air strikes last year and it could have again been the case with retargeting the uranium sites, case closed. But we are now in a potentially protected war for no benefit to the safety of this country. And much to be lost. We've been suckered into it while the Saudis watch from the sidelines and Trump's gets some respite from the Epstein files, which will not go away.
DeleteNew Democrat Platform
ReplyDelete"White skin gives me and every white American immunity from the virus. But we spread it wherever we go—through our words, our actions, and our systems. We don’t have to be showing symptoms—like a white hood or a Confederate flag—to be contagious."
Little faggot James Talarico who gave us the gifts of wiping Jasmine Crockett off the political landscape and defining the Democrat party for a decade.
Meanwhile the Republicans will be having a runoff to determine who is going to lose against Talarico. It won't be close.
DeleteSomerby suggests that stigma is the reason why mental illness, as a term, is no longer preferred. This is what happens when ignorant people speculate instead of educating themselves. The term mental illness has fallen into disfavor because the comparison to physical illness to describe mental and cognitive disorders has been found to be a poor one with fewer parallels than originally thought. Physical illness has different causes and can be cured with physical treatments. The idea of mental illness was first criticized by Thomas Szasz, who suggested that the idea of eccentricity due to failure to conform to societal demands earned a label of illness when there was nothing wrong with a person's mental functioning beyond the cultural misfit and value judgments about conformity. Szasz ignored the suffering of those with mental disorders in his suggestion that adjustment was the main cause of so-called mental illness. Later researchers of the causes of mental illness found that it makes no sense to call something a disorder when the person's behavior does not cause the patient or anyone else major distress. Further, there are no perfecting adjusted people, only people with different coping styles and personalities, and these cause difficulties in some circumstances and not others, especially cross-culturally. That means there is no set of symptoms to point at, as with measles or polio, and say that this is the cause of a person's malfunctioning, without also considering the situational context.
ReplyDeleteThis idea of mental illness does not apply to brain injury or birth defects affecting the brain (such as cerebral palsey or genetic anomalies producing development delays). Defects in the neural substrate that produces behavior and consciousness can be organice, physical in cause, but not all produce disorders, much less illness. For example, those on the autism spectrum can function at a genius level of IQ while having a very different brain organization from more statistically frequent normies. Are left-handed people mentally ill because their brains are organized differently, especially those with divergent language functioning? It makes no sense to talk about that as any kind of mental illness either, nor are those with dyslexia or acalculia ill in any way.
Somerby's obsession with name-calling Trump using a term generally reserved for talking about schizophrenia, major depression, bipolar disorder and OCD, is both offensive and unhelpful when Trump has personality problems exacerbated by his childhood parenting and his obscene wealth, a societal problem, not anything like mental illness. People with these serious mental illness suffer greatly, as do their families. Yes, we are suffering under Trump, but not in the way common to those who are diagnosable with Axis I major mental problems.
Somerby needs to either learn something or stop making a fool of himself and perpetuating inappropriate language use that causes suffering to those with real problems. Yes, Trump has problems, but nothing that treatment or medication or therapy can change. He needs to be tried for his crimes and put in jail, as people with similar problems are treated in our society. The mistake is that Trump has been allowed to slide, receiving no negative feedback for his transgressions in early childhood and has become a monster because we accord wealthy people special privileges, include the right to become wealthier at other people's expense.
There's also the fact that Trump's campaign manager has admitted he gave Trump campaign polling data to his buddy a Russian who then gave the data to the Kremlim.
DeleteMeanwhile, somewhere in the world at any given time, a fanny-burp occurs.
ReplyDeleteThey put sensors on folks butts and they found fanny burps twice as often as previously thought!
DeleteMister Fanny?
ReplyDeleteWho has time to talk about war (ho-hum American soldiers died), when the Epstein Files are turning out to be a "Who's Who of the Republican Party"?
ReplyDeleteTrump's cognitive decline is nothing a guillotine won't fix.
ReplyDelete