ONE PART OF WHAT REMAINS: "Effeminate, gay," the children cried!

THURSDAY, MAY 28, 2026

You're already in a failed state: As we've suggested in the past, the historical record suggests a conclusion:   Sexuality has always been challenging. Sexuality has always been challengingwithin the male sex drive. 

Forget the news reports you read every day about the misconduct of fellows in charge. European literature, let it be said, starts with a story about the behavior which may emerge from the bit of imperfect human wiring to which we've already alluded.   

King Agamemnon, lord of men, has kidnapped the daughter of a priest to Apollo. He's employing her in the standard waysand when her father comes to beg for her return, the lord of men is of course offended.

Professor Fagles presents the translation:    

And all ranks of Achaeans cried out their assent:
"Respect the priest, accept the shining ransom!"
But it brought no joy to the heart of Agamemnon.
The king dismissed the priest with a brutal order
ringing in his ears: "Never again, old man,
let me catch sight of you by the hollow ships!

Not loitering now, not slinking back tomorrow.
The staff and the wreaths of god will never save you then.
The girl? I won't give up the girl. Long before that,
old age will overtake her in my house, in Argos,
far from her fatherland. slaving back and forth
at the loom, forced to share my bed!
                                                              Now go,
don't tempt my wrath, and you may depart alive." 

Right there, at the dawn of the west, he refused to give up the girl! Slaving back and forth at the loom, the girl would also be forced to share the conqueror's bed!

"The old man was terrified," the war poem now says. "He obeyed the order, turning, trailing away in silence down the shore where the battle lines of breakers crash and drag."

To his credit, Agamemnon doesn't try to disguise the shape of his motives. But this is where western literature begins, with the Argive forces under this lord of men ten years into a brutal campaign in response to an earlier sexual insultin response to the (willing) flight of Helen from Greece to Troy, where she now lives as the wife of feckless Paris, son of that city's King Priam.    

That's where the culture begins! Centuries later, the children routinely become upset when related versions of "masculinity" are perhaps referred to as "toxic." 

In modern times, the process of democratization has made it easy for boys and girls of this type to find each other and join forces as a societal subgroupas a tribe. Before, it would have been very hard. Today, such outreach and bonding come easy.

It's in that context that the latest essay by Helen Lewis has appeared in the Atlantic. In her lengthy essay, Lewis is describing the world Where The Podcasters Arebut also the children of Fox:  

The Men Who Want Women to Be Quiet
A virulent form of misogyny has become the single most important force holding together the American right.  

There you see the dual headline which sits atop her lengthy piece. As Lewis starts, she says she'll be describing a movement which is no longer fringea movement which "is sometimes called 'masculinism.' ”

Masculinism? As an inkling of where democratization has taken us, she offers this example, among many others, of the way the human project may now take form if you go Where The Podcasters Are:

The Men Who Want Women to Be Quie

[...] 

The male podcasters who got behind Trump in 2024 now host outright misogynists: Consider the career of the Christian debater Andrew Wilson, who in January appeared on arguably the most popular podcast in America, The Joe Rogan Experience—the manosphere-influencer equivalent of singing the national anthem at the Super Bowl.

Wilson, who appeared on Rogan’s show to promote his online debating courses, originally became famous for appearing repeatedly on Whatever, a dating podcast with 4.6 million YouTube subscribers.

In one episode, Wilson told a female fellow guest that she was too stupid to understand him, so she raised the fact that Wilson’s wife, Rachel, has children with three different men. He went thermonuclear. “You lick snizz,” he barked. “You’re a fucking dyke. Don’t talk shit about my wife, you stupid bitch.” He added, “I’m better than you.” It was an extraordinary display of uncontrolled aggression. In another clip, he mocked a female guest for being unable to open a pickle jar. She handed it to him, and he failed too. “Your hand greased the whole top of it,” he complained. Wilson has one of the most unpleasant internet personas I’ve ever encountered, and I’ve been on Bluesky. (He did not reply to my request for an interview, which was a relief.)  

As with Agamemnon's fury, so it may sometimes go with these modern lords of men. Or you could have watched yesterday's edition of The Five, the most-watched "cable news" program within our modern failed state.   

Sexuality has always been challenging! For the children the Fox News Channel sends out on the air each day, the boundaries of masculinity will be defended in the soul-draining ways the children displayed on yesterday's pitiful program.  

Where did Mediaite go to come up with Willa Pope Robbins? Wherever they went, they need to go there looking for others like her. 

As Robbins reports today, James Talarico is running for the Senate in Texas, and the children on our most-watched "news" program now hurried to call him gay.   

Robbins' report starts like this:

Jesse Watters Mocks James Talarico’s ‘Totally Not Fake Girlfriend’: ‘Does She Exist?’

Fox News host Jesse Watters mocked Texas Senate candidate James Talarico’s love life on Wednesday, heavily implying that the state senator is lying about having a girlfriend by asking, “Does she even exist?”

The host made his remarks on The Five during a segment on Talarico in light of Tuesday night’s primary that saw Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton defeat Senator John Cornyn (R). The scandal-ridden Paxton had snagged President Donald Trump’s unexpected endorsement last week, a move that triggered widespread backlash from many within his party. Paxton is now set to face Talarico in November, and both have already gone on the offensive.

Watters went on an extended rant against Talarico, calling him “effeminate” and mocking his attempts to beat back allegations of being a vegan. He then turned to the candidate’s dating life, noting a recent interview Talarico gave in which he discussed his partner and his choice to keep her identity private.  

That's the way Robbins' report began. She provides videotape of some of what occurred, along with an extended (though incomplete) transcript.  

At this point, we'll take a guess:

We'll guess that Robbins' frankness may have been curtailed by editorial standards at Mediaite. Presumably by editorial dictum, the site doesn't ever report the astounding conduct which occurs on the Gutfeld! program.

That includes the ludicrous imitation of a news discussion which we ourselves surveyed in yesterday's report.  

(Just a guess! The editors have decreed that Gutfeld! is a comedy show, and that its various players are therefore "performing artists." Stating the obvious, Gutfeld! is not a comedy show, but we'll guess that some such editorial judgment explains the program's total absence from the posts at Mediaite.)   

At any rate, sure enough! With the battle lines finally drawnit will be Talarico versus PaxtonThe Five's gay-baiting got started.  

Inevitably, the ludicrous Jesse Watters took the lead, with Dana Perinoshe's supposed to be the sane onepassive-aggressively helping him along. Here's some of what was said:

WATTERS (5/27/26): Jesse, I know you are, you are just ready to go on Talarico, so take it away.

WATTERS: Correction, it's "Tala-Freako." They nominated someone more effeminate than Beto, and I can't wait for this race to get under way. Did you know that he looks prepubescent?   

[...]

WATTERS: He’s also thirty-seven and not married. 

PERINO: [Laughs]

WATTERS: Let’s get into this. 

He says, just recently, that he has a girlfriend. And they have been together for four years. And he called her his best friend, and she was his rock. And he’s not revealing her identity, because he wants to respect her privacy and keep her safe during the campaign.

GUTFELD: Does she live in Canada? 

WATTERS: She lives– 

[LAUGHTER]

WATTERS: Now, if the campaign has only been going on for less than a year, and they have been dating for four years, why haven’t we ever seen this woman before? Basically, what I’m saying is, Does she exist? 

We’re going to find out because, if he wins, are they going to have a coming out party? Or is she still going to stay the secret girlfriend? And is this totally not-fake girlfriend also a vegan? This race–  

This is a great race to cover.

This is a great race to cover! On our nation's most-watched such show, the silly child seemed to think that he was "covering" the Texas race by launching this examination.

He's even more effeminate than Beto was, the silly child had said. Greg Gutfeld now tried to throw to lone Democrat Harold Ford:

GUTFELD (continuing directly): So Harold, I’m willing to bet that Jesse’s strategy of attack will help Talarico win, because none of the things he says has any bearing–like, that’s what the Democrats want. Is–

WATTERS: Yes, a gay vegan is definitely going to win in Texas! Not gay and not vegan, for the record. 

In that way, Watters pretended to try to establish the fact that Talarico isn't gay. He did so after signaling to millions of viewers that they should start baiting the candidate in precisely that way. 

Needless to say, the dissection of this "effeminate," "not gay" man didn't end there. 

Eventually, Kennedy spotted her chance to play. Based on her endless performances, the former VJ was made by God for precisely this line of work. 

Kennedy seems to be smarter than the others, but she rarely lets that hold her back. When the cup was passed to her, the wine spilled down her front:  

PERINO: Cornyn said last night that he's gonna, he's like, "I'm on board. I'll get behind Paxton."

FORD: We'll see.

KENNEDY: I think James Talarico has heard, "I'll get behind it" before.

WATTERS: [Laughter]  

For those who are lucky enough not to know, that's a gay joke too. As she continued, Kennedy provided such news analysis as this: 

KENNEDY: He looks prepubescent. He looks like such a beta male... 

PERINO: They'll say, they'll say, "But he's a seminarian! How dare you not support him?"

KENNEDY: He put the semen in seminarian! 

WATTERS: [Laughter]

When this is the shape of a nation's news culture, that nation isn't "in decline." It has already become a failed state.

As The Five went off the air, Watters gay-baited one last time. Two hours later, the baiting continued on Jesse Watters Primetime, our second most-watched "cable news" program:

Benny Johnson was brought on the air to provide the comedy stylings about how low in testosterone (how "low T") the effeminate "Tala-Freako" is.

Johnson is a classic post-democratization figure. His summation for the simpering Watters went exactly like this:

JOHNSON (5/27/26): So once again, the reason why Democrats are failing is they've given up on masculinity. They've given up on testosterone. They've given up entirely for effeminate, astrogenetic, catty and totally embarrassing candidates like Beto O'Rourke and "Beta" here.

We don't know what "astrogenetic" means in this context (if anything). But there you see a form of modern "masculinism" being robustly expressed.

Earlier, Jonson had offered this:

JOHNSON: Clearly, Michelle Obama has more testosterone than Talarico. James Talarico is a guy who could be played by Eliot Page in a new Christopher Nolan move, or a Subaru ad.

This plays on a standard Gutfeld! hook, in which Michelle Obama is said to secretly be a man while her husband is said to be secretly gay. Eliot Page was once the very popular Ellen Page, so you can see where that comes in.

This is who and what these fellow citizens are. You won't learn about the things they say and do in the timorous New York Times (or on MS NOW), but this is the relentless shape of their reactions and of their discourse. 

Johnson is the sort of person who never would have emerged before the democratization came into our lives. The leading authority on his life offers this instant thumbnail

Benny Johnson (columnist)

Benny Johnson (born May 27, 1987) is an American right-wing political commentator and YouTuber. He has contributed to several conservative media outlets such as Breitbart News, TheBlaze, National Review, and The Daily Caller.

Johnson was previously employed with BuzzFeed but was fired in 2014 due to several instances of plagiarism, where he used text from sources such as Yahoo Answers and Wikipedia without giving due credit.

Johnson has also worked for Turning Point USA and hosted for Newsmax TV.

How does a fellow like that gain prominence? Later, we're told about the way the discourse currently works:

Johnson runs three YouTube channels: "Benny Johnson," "Benny On The Block" and "Benny Brews." Johnson also hosts a podcast called The Benny Show. His main YouTube channel, titled "Benny Johnson," has amassed 6.01 million subscribers and 4 billion views as of September 2025.

Three YouTube channels, with a podcast to boot! In such ways, the democratization has given life to modern-day "masculinism." 

Lewis describes the movement in her essay for the Atlantic. We'll return to her findings tomorrow, but our literary culture began long ago on the plains outside Troy.

It all began on the plains outside Troy. With Agamemnon's fury concerning "the girl," it all began in this same general way.

Tomorrow: Able to find each other


22 comments:

  1. Quaker in a BasementMay 28, 2026 at 11:41 AM

    Paxton engineered a plea deal to let a convicted child rapist off with one day in prison.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Surely Watters mentioned that..?

      Delete
  2. No Kings on June 14th to counter program the garish UFC fight on WH grounds on demented Shitler's 80th birthday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find the planned UFC fight bizarre. What does it have to do with our 250th anniversary? What is it's justification?

      Delete
    2. Why are you asking this question here, DiC? It’s what your party has become.

      Delete
    3. What the fuck is wrong with you, dickhead? King Chickenshit is doing this to honor King Chickenshit! Bizarre?
      You fucking did this to us.

      Delete
  3. So just i can gauge the political acumen of those on this site, is there anyone here who really believes that Talarico has any chance of winning in Texas?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I met someone at a luncheon last week who thought he had a chance. I didn't say anything.

      Delete
    2. 12:15, fuck no, have you ever listened to those maggot imbeciles in Texas?

      Delete
  4. Bob's term "failed state" is overly dramatic. The government is not the whole state. The media is not the whole government. One minor TV show is not the whole media.

    In the US, most citizens are living normal, comfortable lives. That's not the case for many other countries -- countries where a lousy TV show is not their biggest problem.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's funny how when we are deciding who will control the government and will make the decisions affecting all our lives, it's a matter of life and death to dickheads who is chosen. But when it is observed that the government is the hands of a raving lunatic, dickhead will nonchalantly comment how unimportant that is.

      Why don't you go take a flying fuck, dickface.

      Delete
    2. Two things, DiC. One, Somerby didn’t say that Gutfeld was our biggest problem.

      Two, what I think you can take away from the rhetoric of Watters and Gutfeld coupled with the success of a criminal and serial adulterer like Paxton (impeached by his own party) is an insight into today’s Republican Party, your party, where a single minded focus on toxic, childish insults about a candidate’s “masculinity” apparently works for your party. (also, you asked above why is Trump throwing UFC event at the White House? It’s all about toxic masculinity and appealing to that crowd of morons. )
      And that’s no way to run a country.

      Delete
    3. “ normal, comfortable lives.”

      Really?

      Delete
    4. Compared to the rest of history, people are living abnormally comfortable lives. Even poor people live lives of extravagant comfort compared to the rest of history. Eg. even the poor today are wearing clothes and shoes that the most powerful Kings and Queens could have only dreamed of wearing 500 years ago.

      Delete
    5. In the US, most citizens are living normal, comfortable lives.
      How do you know that, David?

      Delete
    6. I agree that the term "failed state" used by Somerby is inappropriate.

      Delete
  5. Sexuality is no more challenging for men than for women. This idea that it is challenging has been used as both an excuse for sexual misbehavior and a justification for male privilege. As long as Somerby thinks like this, he is not going to understand "sexual politics."

    ReplyDelete
  6. A nice Trump achievement for DC and for America. Columbus Circle at Union Station is completely restored
    https://x.com/reaganreese_/status/2059993271523242458?
    This may not be the biggest thing in the world, but it's something past Presidents and Mayors were never able to do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why must you always lick Trump’s ass, DiC?

      Delete
    2. Sure dickhead, no other person ever could have cleaned the statues by giving our corrupt no bid contracts to his buddies.

      Fuck you straight to fucking hell.

      Delete
  7. "...European literature, let it be said, starts with a story about the behavior which may emerge from the bit of imperfect human wiring to which we've already alluded."

    European literature, especially English literature starts with Beowulf not Homer. It is significant that Somerby omits the role of the Greek Gods in the story Homer tells. Perhaps he does that because we in the USA do not believe in those Gods any more, but they are nevertheless important as motivators of the behavior that occurs. THAT, not men's desires, are the reasons for what happens to women.

    Here is the story of the start of the Trojan War, which Somerby has never described here:

    "Because of the intervention, the gods start the war between Trojans and Achaeans and the reason of the war leads them to take sides. Before the start of the war, the gods hold a wedding feast for the honor of Thetis and
    Peleus, the parents of Achilles and the goddess Eris is not invited to wedding. Eris, in revenge, throws a golden apple inscribed "for the fairest" into the banquet hall, knowing it will cause trouble. All the goddesses claim it for themselves and the goddesses Aphrodite, Hera and Athena ask Zeus to make the final decision but Zeus decides that the task should be delegated to a mortal, Paris who is one of the princes of Troy and a son of Priam. Each of the three goddesses offers Paris a bribe so that he will name her the fairest: Hera promises him a large kingdom; to make him lord of Europe and Asia, Athena promises him a military glory and rampage all over Greece, Aphrodite promises him to give the most beautiful woman in the world, Helen, the wife of Menelaus, who is the king of Sparta. Paris visits
    Menelaus in Sparta and falls in love with Helen, taking her back to Troy with him, thus the war starts between Trojans and Achaeans."

    By omitting this part of the Iliad in which female gods have agency, Somerby limits his consideration to what men do in a fight they did not themselves start. Further, Somerby has mused here about Helen's regrets about going with Paris, when she was at the mercy of the gods and did not make that choice herself. The neglect of the meddling by the gods that Somerby indulges here makes analysis of what is happening on the human level impossible, so flawed that it can have no relevance, especially to modern behavior.

    Somerby would do better to learn some psychology. There is a large literature on relationships and behavior that he seems largely unaware of. That makes him underqualified to express opinions here, especially given that he has obviously read nothing in the large literature that includes feminist philosophers and social scientists.

    He is just going to embarrass himself with his sexist garbage. It has already started with this return to "sacred Homer" who was himself not anything close to an expert on men or women's behavior. He may not even have existed as a historical person, according to experts.

    ReplyDelete