SATURDAY, JUNE 6, 2026
Helen Lewis, superb again: As you may recall, it's the cover report in the June edition of The Atlantic. On the magazine's somewhat bluer than pale blue cover, the essay is described this way:
THE MEN WHO FEAR WOMEN
By HELEN LEWIS
We wrote about Lewis' essay last week. Online, it appears beneath this dual headline, and begins in the manner shown:
THE MEN WHO WANT WOMEN TO BE QUIET
A virulent form of misogyny has become the single most important force holding together the American right.
By Helen Lewis
Douglas Wilson has a modest proposal to improve American life: He wants to repeal the Nineteenth Amendment, which gave women the vote. In his ideal system, “we would do it in our politics the same way we do it in our church structure,” he told me recently. “And that is, we vote by household.”
Wilson is a co-founder of the Communion of Reformed Evangelical Churches, based in Moscow, Idaho. Over the past five decades, he has built a small empire there, dedicated to disseminating his theocratic vision for the United States: a publishing house, a school, a liberal-arts college, and a video-streaming service. His denomination, which has about 170 affiliated churches, counts Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as a member, and Wilson was invited to lead a prayer service at the Pentagon in February. So when the pastor casually suggests disenfranchising half of America, people listen.
That's the way the essay begins.
People have written about Pastor Wilson before—about the pastor whose denomination includes the perpetually furious Secretary Hegseth as a member. In her essay, Lewis goes into substantial detail, first about Pastor Wilson, but then about an array of pastors, podcasters and streamers, not excluding "a loose collection of trolls known as Groypers," all of whom are part of a burgeoning gender-based movement.
As you may recalls, Lewis is writing about a loose affiliation of millionaires and other furious men. They're sometimes said to belong to the movement she starts to describe in this passage:
Wilson is a prominent voice in what is sometimes called “masculinism”: a movement to fight back against the advances of feminism and reassert the primacy of men. His version is religious, influenced by the notion of male “headship” of the family and Saint Paul’s belief that godly women should “be quiet.” There are also plenty of secular masculinists, as well as nominally Muslim ones, such as the streamer Sneako, the self-proclaimed pimp Andrew Tate, and the podcaster Myron Gaines. Woman-bashing plays well on social media and sells lots of ads for crypto, sports betting, and supplements. You can make good money telling men that they’re the truly oppressed sex.
Masculinism! For ourselves, we'll go ahead and take a guess—the attitudes which Lewis goes on to describe are deeply bred in the bone. Some men are condemned to have a bit too much of the neural wiring which inspires them to loathe women in a significant way.
The chemicals float around in their brains, perhaps in slightly excessive volume. Such men are thereby inspired to a dimwitted loathing they may find it hard to quit.
The invention of podcasts and similar technologies have helped these afflicted parties find each other and become angrier still. They may end up going on the Fox News Channel and offering ugly insults posing as jokes—such self-revelations as this:
And finally, the New World screwworm, which eats animals from the inside out, has been finally found in America, inside a cow.
Scientists say this is just the latest of many reasons to avoid sex with Joy Behar.
[PHOTO of Joy Behar]
AUDIENCE: Cheering, applause
The Republicans Who Impugn Talarico’s ManhoodAttacks on the Democratic Senate candidate in Texas show the GOP’s narrow, anxious definition of masculinity.By Helen LewisThe attacks on James Talarico have not been subtle. In the weeks since the 37-year-old state representative won the Democratic U.S. Senate primary in Texas, Republicans have been describing him as “Low-T Talarico,” “James Talafreako,” and “Six-Gender Jimmy.” On May 28, the White House immigration czar Stephen Miller said on Fox News that it was “brave, courageous, that the Democratic Party would choose Texas, of all places, to nominate their first transgender Senate candidate.”The Republicans have long marketed themselves as the manlier party, but the anti-Talarico blitzkrieg is both obviously coordinated and unusually overt. The overarching strategy here, as the Democratic presidential hopeful Rahm Emanuel has previously pointed out, is to associate the entire left with being “weak and woke.” Not manly, in other words. Talarico’s aw-shucks niceness and youthful looks are reframed as the result of low testosterone, and his (admittedly mawkish and over-egged) statements of concern for gender-nonconforming children make him a “freak.” Worst of all, according to the Florida Republican Dan Weldon, Talarico looks as though he “couldn’t name a single obscure wide receiver from the early 2000s.” Supporters of the Republican candidate, state Attorney General Ken Paxton, portray Democrats as wusses, cucks, soy boys who don’t follow sports. One commentator mused about whether Talarico wears “frilly underwear.”
Mostly, the attacks on Talarico have taken the form of 99,999 dog whistles implying that he is gay. On Fox News, Jesse Watters laughingly observed that the Democrats had rebuffed rumors that Talarico is vegan by posting photos of him “swallowing large sticks of meat.” He added: “He’s also 37 and not married.” When the New York Post confirmed that Talarico’s girlfriend exists by revealing her identity, the attack line mutated—did you know that she’s vegan? Pretty gay.By the way, I recommend watching the clip of Watters and [Stephen] Miller in full, because Miller has the kind of natural comic gifts that usually persuade people to forsake a career in stand-up and become a funeral director instead. Watters underlines the pathos by providing what I can describe only as live-action canned laughter. And yet, Miller must have some sense of humor, because his (vegan) roast of Talarico concluded with the assertion that the people of Texas, “some of the toughest, roughest, strongest men and women” in America, would never vote for “somebody with that much soy to be a U.S. senator, compared to a real conservative, patriotic, God-fearing, and truly beloved statewide figure in Ken Paxton.”
Ken Paxton? Truly beloved? Now, that’s comedy. Ken Paxton is not even truly beloved in Ken Paxton’s own party...
"In fairness, he didn't invent the brain chemistry, the chemical torrent, which leads some men, even today, to succumb to such acts of loathing"
ReplyDeleteTrue enough. Gutfeld didn't invent this or any other sort of brain chemistry.
What he does is he goes on Fox nightly to reassure men who are thus afflicted that they needn't make any effort at all to cope with such conditions--they can feel free to let their behavior be as juvenile and offensive as it can possibly be.
It used to be that part of growing up was learning to moderate one's impulses as a way to join a wider community filled with different kinds of people.
That, apparently, is woke. Go ahead children. Indulge yourselves. Let your inner toddler have his tantrum. That's what real men do.
News headline: “Wall Street ends sharply lower as chips slide, jobs data fuel rate hike fears”
ReplyDeleteThe stock market tanked yesterday due to rising inflation, stagnant wages, and weak employment - a complete and total reversal from where we were headed back in 2024.
Yeah but the reflecting pool has been painted blue and Ghislaine Maxwell has been sent to a summer camp
DeleteNever forget, we also lost our war with Iran on day one and we have no cards and Preznit is bored of the whole dum(b) thing.
DeleteTrump can be rightfully proud of the big rise in the stock market since he took office. Faulting him for a big one day drop is naive.
DeleteThis is the first drop of many. Trump has been involved in a pump and dump scheme where he artificially increases the value of specific stocks by making public statements or engaging in acts that influence the stock prices. Then he has associates buy large amounts of the stock whose price he has manipulated. I fault him for that stuff. It is corrupt.
DeleteNo, not the first drop.
DeleteThe NASDAQ today is up 30% from its highs in 2024.
Delete"The Nasdaq Composite tumbled 4.2% (down 1,121.53 points) to close at 25,709.43 on Friday, June 5, suffering its worst selloff since April 2025. The drop was triggered by a surprisingly strong May jobs report that reignited fears of Federal Reserve interest rate hikes and was exacerbated by a massive sell-off in AI and semiconductor stocks.Because Friday was the final trading day of the week, this remains the current status of the market heading into the weekend."
DeleteYou can pick any date for comparison to suggest that the NASDAQ is doing well, but it too fell yesterday.
10:46 picked 2024 as a point of a comparison.
DeleteAre you making an argument that the NASDAQ is not doing well?
DeleteI am saying that it tanked on Friday. 2024 was a long time ago, at the end of Biden's term. I don't think it is easy to compare markets with then because of Trump's blatant manipulation of markets. We haven't yet experienced the longer term consequences of Trump's incompetence, so I don't think you should brag yet.
DeleteSome days, like today, Bob claims it’s bred in the bone, other days he says it’s due to upbringing; in reality, Bob hasn’t a clue but that doesn’t stop him from mouthing off his ignorant nonsense with a distinctly masculine unearned confidence.
ReplyDeleteThink he is pissed he is too old to make bank as a choad influencer.
Delete"For ourselves, we'll go ahead and take a guess—the attitudes which Lewis goes on to describe are deeply bred in the bone. Some men are condemned to have a bit too much of the neural wiring which inspires them to loathe women in a significant way."
ReplyDeleteIt must be comforting to Somerby and to men who hate women to believe that their social problem arises from too much testosterone, but that isn't the case. Somerby also believes that dominance is bred in the bone, his term for innate, physiologically based.
Unfortunately, psychological science does not support this view. Boys who are bullies are disliked. They are ostracized and do not become leaders. They tend to have no friends in childhood or manhood. The ability to coerce others does not lead to satisfying male or female relationships. Men dosing themselves with testosterone because they think it will make them alpha males are not helping themselves but may create health problems.
Some of Trump's health problems are similar to what happens when men take too much testosterone: (1) thick blood leading blood clots, stroke and heart problems, (2) heart muscle damage, bad cholesterol, elevated blood pressure, (3) low sperm counts, shrunken testicles, and can lead to impotence, prostate enlargement and cancer; (4) acne, oily skin, baldness; (5) fluid retention, swollen legs and feet, man-boobs; (6) uncharacteristic aggression, extreme mood swings, irritability, and impaired judgment; (7) severe insomnia and worsened sleep apnea, (8) liver damage.
Compare these testosterone-related risks to Trump's recent medical exam results. Trump takes excessively large doses of aspirin daily because he doesn't want "thick blood." How does he even know that term unless he is concerned about testosterone supplement side effects? His latest report mentions prostate concerns. He has swelling of his extremities and manages his cholesterol using drugs. He has unexplained skin problems. He displays the psychological symptoms of irritability, mood swings, aggression and impaired judgment, and he has severe insomnia.
While there can be other causes of each of these symptoms, the pattern is there. It seems probably that Trump may have been taking extra testosterone for years. Now there is a men's movement forming that may encourage other men to follow that same path. The last thing we need is a bunch of socially inadequate men hyped up on drugs that make them more aggressive and less reasonable. This seems like a really bad idea, especially when these men are being placed in positions of power.
Just as corporations have routinely administered drug tests to job applicants, testing largely for recreational drugs and street drugs that may impair their job performance, it seems time for men in power to be administered tests for these hormone altering drugs, explicitly testosterone supplements. And they can test for ketamine and adderall while they're at it.
Somerby doesn't seem to understand the difference between "neural wiring" which refers to interconnections among neurons in the brain, and hormones, which are released by the brain communicating with the pituitary gland and hypothalamus but circulate in the blood stream to control functioning of other organs in the body.
DeleteThere are some good books on the subject of how the brain and body work, but I doubt Somerby will ever read one. He could have taken a psychology course at Harvard, where they also each this stuff, but he obviously didn't bother.
"Some men are condemned to have a bit too much of the neural wiring which inspires them to loathe women in a significant way. "
DeleteThe ignorance in this statement, even if you accept the brain as a metaphor.
Does a person who dislikes dogs have too much anti-dog neural wiring?
Most scientists accept evolution as a theoretical framework for explaining how our species (and others) developed its characteristics. What would be the survival advantage of men hating women when it is necessary to reproduce and propagate the species? Some men argue that rape evolved for that reason, but is there an advantage to force rather than cooperation? Is there no pleasure in relationships that would serve the purpose of glueing together a couple for the advantage of the children (who need care until they can survive independently). And what about the huge amount of evidence that positive social interactions (encouraged by smiling and talking not hitting) are bred in the bone, not violent conflict?
Somerby is an idiot. He is unable to introspect on the ways this explanation appeals to him in his own personal life so that he can evaluate masculinism objectively. He knows very little about social science and even less about how his own mind works. But that doesn't stop him from pontificating -- much the way Trump does when he explains that magnets won't work if you get them wet.
"You can make good money telling men that they’re the truly oppressed sex."
ReplyDeleteSomerby appears to have bought this message hook, line and sinker himself. Gratuitously adding the adjective "furious" before the word "men" is a symptom of where Somerby stands on this issue. He thinks men have a lot to be angry about, based on his essays over the past 10 years.
Not only can a conman make good money off men's entitled sense of grievance, but men can be manipulated using this same message. People are making a bundle selling supplements on the internet, but Trump gained office telling white men they were unfairly treated and should be the rightful owners and rulers of our planet. Women are being presented as the symbol of men's impotence. A woman who is "allowed" to work, much less be successful emasculates her husband. A woman who speaks out is an embarrassment to the man she is attached to.
Feminists understand the men's movement and they have analyzed and written about it. Hannah Lewis didn't invent this stuff -- she is reporting on it. Somerby obviously feels like she "gets him," but he has obviously not been reading any feminist writing on the subject of patriarchy and misogyny or even men blaming women for the problems in their lives (scapegoating).
Women have been ahead of the curve on this subject. That is partly why women now favor Democrats by 20 points and have been among the first to abandon MAGA on the right. Women can see the dangers for themselves in this encouragement of male whining at their expense. If there is any protection for women, it is on the left, not the right.
Does Barney Frank understand that? I don't think so.
You can make money by telling anyone that they are oppressed. It’s like our national sport.
DeleteSome people actually are oppressed while others clearly are not. How much money do you believe civil rights activists make compared to Trump?
DeleteNo one has ever had to tell black people or women that they have been historically oppressed. The writing about oppression from the times when civil rights were forefront were written by black people and women themselves, not by white men trying to make money off of them.
DeleteBut David, your racism and sexism are showing again.
“You can make money by telling anyone that they are oppressed.”
DeleteJust ask Grand Wizard John Roberts
"The Atlantic has thereby decided to bite the bullet and join the human race! That said, the New York Times still seems to cower in fear. So do the silent stars at MS NOW, from Rachel and Lawrence on down."
ReplyDeleteThis is Somerby's big lie. The Atlantic publishes controversy in order to get clicks. It does not stand behind the ideas of its authors. This was not an editorial by Lewis.
It is a joke to claim that Rachel Maddow has never talked about feminism or the men's movement -- long ago, before it became the operating philosophy of the Trump regime (in 2015, not just lately).
Jeffrey Epstein surrounded himself with sociobiologists like Pinker in order to provide a pseudo-intellectual justification for their abuse of young girls. That too is part of this masculinism and it goes way back, even if Somerby is just discovering it.
Trump is the least popular president in history and MAGA is splintering as increasingly Dems are finding their spine.
ReplyDeleteIt’s looking pretty gloomy for those of us in the Republican Party.
We had a wild party all night fueled by the drug of dominance, and now are waking to the worst hangover ever, stumbling out into the bright sun as we do our walk of shame.
Sure thing bud.
Delete"That said, our own Blue America, as a group, has never had a sexual politics."
ReplyDeleteWe have another long time North/South ideological split when it comes to women's rights. Democrats finally supported women's suffrage back in the day:
"Democrats had a highly divided relationship with the women's suffrage movement. While the party eventually provided key support to pass the 19th Amendment, this backing was largely driven by Northern Democrats and President Woodrow Wilson, as a powerful faction of Southern Democrats strongly opposed the measure."
Since the Southern Democrats slithered over to the Republican party, the remaining Democratic party has supported women's rights consistently, including pro-choice, equal pay, and various women's issues in its ongoing party platforms during each presidential election. Democratic candidates on the state and local levels also have tended to support women's civil rights and health issues.
Somerby has never used the term "sexual politics" in the way it was defined by its originator Kate Millett. Her definition is:
"Sexual politics refers to the power dynamics and social hierarchies embedded in relationships, gender roles, and sexuality. It highlights how cultural norms, societal structures, and institutions dictate who holds power in romantic, social, and professional spheres based on sex and identity."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_Politics
In order to claim that someone like Rachel Maddow has never discussed sexual politics, Somerby himself needs to understand what that term means. Somerby has no idea. He refers to the rapes and murders of women in The Iliad as sexual politics. His ignorance while appropriating a serious term and topic is itself insulting and an example of attempted mansplaining.
But we already know he is an asshole on this topic because of the many ugly things he has said in this blog.
Here is Tiedrich's view on too much testosterone:
ReplyDelete"here’s a sure sign you’re trapped in the shittiest timeline ever: every single thing has to be dumbed down and cartoonized.
[AI enhanced photo of Mike Rogers]
that’s Mike Rogers. he’s some low-wattage Republican yutz running for Senate in Michigan.
Mike’s a big ball of who fucking cares, am I right?
he can’t run on his record as a member of the House, because — like all MAGAfied Republicans — his record sucks. so Mike’s handlers had to figure out some way to make their underwhelming nobody stand out. look at what they did: they used AI to beef him up, and turn him into some garish cartoon version of himself.
how annoying is it that we live in the dumbfuckiest nation on the planet, where Republican shitwits see something like this, and go ‘yeah, absolutely. let’s vote for Mister Beef.’"
The memes of Rogers are hilarious:
https://www.jefftiedrich.com/p/this-week-in-stupid-june-6-edition
This one is also funny:
Delete"here are a couple more reasons why you should never let the six-fingered plagiarism robot crank out your bigoted propaganda.
when using the Holy Umbrella of Righteous Hatred to keep your family from being soaked by all the gayness pouring down from the sky, it always helps to have three hands."
You have to look closely at the image to see that there are actually three hands, because how else can the dad hold that umbrella?
Symbolically, it does seem unfair that all of the duty to protective wife and kiddies falls on a guy who may not be up to the task, given the complexities and dangers of our modern world. That is why people evolved the ability to work in groups, something Somerby has never mastered and does not recognize is important, based on his diatribes here.
If we create a brave new world in which men are back to being the one responsible for all that happens to his family, no safety net and no help (on pain of being a wuss) that is going to create huge stress on the guys experiencing the results of job loss due to AI, invasion of the US by Russia, another Great Depression, and unbridled violence by other male predators who might like to concubinize that pretty young daughter (see image). Gays are not the biggest threat.
Correct, in fact, I am the greatest threat.
DeleteThe last time Somerby mentioned Helen Lewis (before this current article came out), was a year ago. She was talking about Louis C.K. in Saudi Arabia at the Riydah Comedy Festival. No wonder he thinks she is superb.
ReplyDeleteI misread "Republican" as "Reptilian" - or maybe not...
ReplyDeleteSame thing, take a close look at the lizard women of Mar-a-Lago. Scary shit man!
Delete"If misogyny is what's fueling the GOP's ongoing destruction of democracy, then we should recognize that women's voting rights have gone too far." -- Barney Frank from the grave
ReplyDeleteHa!
DeleteTrump has been praising men's physical attributes lately. At the Agriculture Roundtable on Friday he referred to the farmer next to him as "one hell of a specimen" saying "I thought I was big until I met you!" He also referred to Olympic speed skater Jordan Stolz: "I forgot to touch his leg. His leg is like a rock."
ReplyDeleteDo Republicans understand how gay this sounds? It is like their personal way of celebrating Pride Month.
This isn't new with Trump. Last week he was asking if some man was a male model, since he look so beautiful. Did someone perhaps suggest to Trump that it was inappropriate to comment on beautiful women around him, and he misunderstood the instruction? His obsession with no fatties at his 250th rally is pretty weird too. Is it an attempt to show dominance?
I suspect he thinks he is praising them by commenting on their physical attributes, size or leg hardness. Or he may have been confused about what he was fondling.
DeleteThere was that time when Trump publicly told a story about Arnold Palmer’s giant schlong…
DeleteWhy is our president acting so gay? Did he decide to celebrate Pride Month after all? Doesn't this make his accomplices feel uneasy?
DeleteWhy is the narcissist who wears orange makeup caked on and spends hours arranging the bird’s nest he wears on his head acting so gay?
DeleteHis body is failing fast, and he is admiring what he doesn't have.
DeleteOther elderly men do not go around saying and doing stuff like this, so this also shows Trump's dementia that he says what he is thinking out loud, without shame and in such an undignified way.
DeleteTurns out, the proper reaction to Republican's whining about Joe Biden's inflation was to tell them to go fuck themselves with a rusty saw.
ReplyDeleteWho knew?
Simon Rosenberg explains that Trump has the worst jobs record of anyone since Hoover (with data):
Deletehttps://www.hopiumchronicles.com/p/reality-check-trump-has-the-worst
Trump has negative job growth across his two terms (so far). Comparing Democratic presidents to Republican presidents, Democrats have 84.5 million new jobs compared to 32.5 million for Republicans.
Rosenberg says:
"As of this morning my bottom line on the week - Trump is in profound political and physical decline; we have the wind at our backs and strong candidates running all across the country; they are going to fight like hell and do “whatever it takes” to stay in power; and we must fight like hell every day to beat them this November and ensure there is a peaceful transfer of power in January.
Trump got a goods job report yesterday and then the stock market tanked. So that little bit of good news the White House got was tempered by the broader damage their domestic policies - tariffs, health care cuts, mass deportation, tax cuts/bigger deficits - and his failed war have done to the economic lives of Americans and our overall economy - soaring inflation, slowing GDP growth, real wage decline, rising health care costs and reduced access to care, struggle for farmers and small businesses.
It’s was a powerful and sobering reminder that there is no easy way out for Trump and the Rs from the historic failure of their government, and even the one thing that has gone right - the stock market - may be on shakier ground than they understood."
As Krugman explains, the stock market tanked because the jobs report (and other indicators) do not justify cutting interest rates. Instead they are likely to rise, which the market did not like.
DeleteSomerby acknowledges that there is misogyny, although he tends to localize it to specific instances like Gutfeld and Watters. He never acknowledges that “blue America” has generally fought against it, preferring to claim that “blue America” has no sexual politics. (I still have no idea what he means when he says this.)
ReplyDeleteWhat he misses is that misogyny is part of the straight white male dominance ethos. He dislikes and rarely discusses racism and homophobia, attacking liberals when they notice, and telling them they need to stop.
If he thinks blue America is lacking a sexual politics, and his “proof” is that people on MSNOW ignore Gutfeld and Watters, is he asking liberals to make broader attacks on misogyny, or just on Gutfeld and Watters?
"SATURDAY: The Atlantic joins the human race!"
ReplyDeleteSomerby has a lot of nerve presuming to define who is and is not a member of the human race. That was the road the Nazis went down. It led to genocide.
It is interesting that Somerby has been calling Trump crazy without noticing the sexual-politics implications of using that term against a man such as the president.
ReplyDeleteAs feminist philosopher Kate Manne notes, the word crazy is usually applied to women and has a disproportionately negative impact on women when it is used against them.
Manne says:
"What is someone saying when they call you crazy? They’re saying you’re so unreliable and erratic in your habits of mind and your behavior that you should be written off as a person. They are saying that you are a threat, a liability, and a danger to yourself and others. The application of the term “crazy,” when it gets uptake, can serve to cancel a person in one fell swoop. The term is not just descriptive of an unspecified kind of mental illness and deviant behavior: it functions as a pejorative, and also a kind of warning label. Calling you crazy tells others not to tangle with you. You are at best to be managed, and likely simply avoided.
But the term “crazy” can also serve to justify violence: arrests, incarceration, institutionalization, and forced sterilization are the fates that have often befallen people tarnished with this label. If you’re crazy, it’s for your own good and vital for the protection of others.
Disability scholars have done fascinating work on reclaiming the terms “mad” and “madness,” which are linked to the controversial possibility of embracing rather than trying to assuage certain forms of mental illness. But I don’t know of any efforts to do this with the word “crazy.” I suspect it is a term that really cannot be revived—you can’t breathe new life into a term that marks you for social death, to use Orlando Patterson’s notion. When pop culture flirts with any ambivalence about craziness, it’s usually in a circumscribed form: we are crazily in love or are crazy about someone or something. The primary acceptable way of losing our minds and acting erratically is in service of heteronormatively-sanctioned romantic narratives. And there’s always a danger of being written off in the process—as a crazy ex, a crazy stalker, a crazy fan, and so on."
This is clearly not what Somerby intends when he has called Trump crazy. He has used the term to rehabilitate Trump, to excuse him. But what does it imply when a man who is a sociopath and criminal is instead described using a gendered term mostly used to control women? It weakens the seriousness of Trump's illness and can be dismissed since Trump is not female or feminine but has a cultivated image of manliness that conflicts with the term. Is that deliberate, to mock the idea that Trump is insane, or is it his way of deflecting all criticism, or both?
https://katemanne.substack.com/p/when-youre-called-crazy
DeleteHere is an excerpt from Katie Johnson's testimony against Donald Trump:
ReplyDelete"[Trump] ripped off all my clothes and he started to basically have sex with me and I was screaming. I’d never had sex before, it was my first time and [Epstein’s handler] Tiffany was yelling at him too. She was saying I was a virgin and he told us to just shut the fuck up and just basically took my virginity while I was crying and telling him to stop and basically begging for him to just stop...
[Afterward] I was crying and Tiffany was consoling me and she was apologizing. She told me that she would never put me in that situation again. But he comes over mad because I was crying and he said that I should be thankful that someone like Donald Trump took my virginity. Well, he didn’t say took my virginity. He said, I should be glad that someone like Donald Trump popped my cherry and not some pimply little 14 year old. And I just was like, “What if I get pregnant?” Not even talking to him. I didn’t want to talk to him. I was talking to Tiffany and he said, “Well you’ll get an abortion then, bitch.”
These are the acts of an evil person, not a crazy person. This is misogyny, not calling Joy Behar a cow. This is why Congress needs to release the unredacted Epstein files and bring men like Trump to trial. It is wrong that these men have escaped prosecution for their crimes.
https://katemanne.substack.com/p/the-actual-conspiracy-theory-surrounding
If Somerby wants to use the word "furious," women are furious about what was done to the Epstein victims and are not going to forget Republican obstruction of justice. I do not forgive Somerby's efforts to defend Trump from his own actions by calling him insane, by ignoring this issue while reducing misogyny to trivial bad jokes and too much male wiring. He isn't fooling anyone with this garbage.
DeleteManne: "trans people are currently fighting a major political battle to not be labeled crazy (or delusional) for simply being who they are and demanding social recognition"
ReplyDeleteFrom an economic POV, private sector jobs are good: they create wealth. Government jobs are bad: they consume wealth. Trump has done pretty well at increasing private sector jobs and reducing government jobs.
ReplyDeletePeople with govt jobs spend their salaries in the economy just like people with private sector jobs. The jobs report includes 55,000 local govt jobs, that is nearly 1/3. 70,000 were tourism jobs likely related to the World Cup. Those two sources account for 72% of job growth.
DeleteGovernment worker salaries are paid from taxes on businesses and their workers. Without businesses, there is no money for government or anything else.
DeleteWho suggested eliminating all businesses? Not me. When businesses are taxed, they contribute to the infrastructure needed to run their business. Workers pay taxes in order to receive govt services too.
DeleteI think it was very bad when Trump let DOGE do away with important govt services that businesses and taxpayers depend on. That is bad for our economy.
People in democratic socialist countries, who pay extremely high taxes, wouldn't give up their free health care, plentiful vacations, free child care, free higher education for their kids, pensions, and other govt benefits, to be taxed less. They are happy with the tradeoffs.
Delete@3:24 - yes, people in some socialist countries are happy with the system. But there are many socialist countries where people are not so happy. E.g., Cuba, Zimbabwe. The problems with socialism isn’t just high taxes. The problem often is that it leads to poverty instead of wealth.
DeleteSpoken like someone who has never been outside of the USA. A real moran.
DeleteYes, it helps to be wealthy under any system. Socialism does not lead to poverty. There is no consensus on that, and when socialism is combined with an authoritarian system, as it was in the USSR, it is difficult to identify what failed.
DeleteNo, I agree. Government jobs are bad. Get rid of the military, the FBI, the CIA, the DOJ, meteorologists, scientists, statisticians, etc,
Delete"People in democratic socialist countries, who pay extremely high taxes, wouldn't give up their free health care, plentiful vacations, free child care, free higher education for their kids, pensions, and other govt benefits, to be taxed less. They are happy with the tradeoffs."
DeleteWhat makes you say this? What is your basis for saying this? Do you even know what the trade-offs are? What are they? Do you know?
"Masculinism! For ourselves, we'll go ahead and take a guess—the attitudes which Lewis goes on to describe are deeply bred in the bone."
ReplyDeleteLewis herself suggests, immediately before Somerby's idiocy, that there is good money in telling men they are oppressed, selling crypto, betting markets and supplements. SHE is not saying these attitudes are "deeply bred" in anyone's bone. She is saying the manosphere is a grift.
Somerby hears what he wants to hear and puts words into Lewis's mouth that she clearly did not say. No one believes that being a male supremacist is a biological function.
This is akin to saying that white people are racist because they are so obviously better than black people, so racism is the natural outcome of living alongside black people.
Somerby is implying that it is natural to hate women when a man is so well-endowed or hormonally sexy he just can't help but feel that way, bonewise. Some men are born to dominate, Somerby hints, and he claims that hating women is the natural outcome of being so deeply male. What a crock!
This bred in the bone stuff is Somerby's confession that he is a consumer of manosphere propaganda. Not a surprise given his Fox News addiction. These things go together.
DeleteWhen a man holds noxous attitudes toward women, women are repelled by those ideas and will reject him and treat him poorly. That creates a vicious circle where the rejection fuels the hate, justified and supported by the bros online who share that experience.
DeletePart of fatherhood used to be teaching a son about how to interact with women in order to form positive relationships, as friends and romantic partners, wives and daughters. Somerby had no father to speak of (according to himself) so he perhaps missed out on the advice and the example of a man interacting positively with his mother. That is no excuse. Most boys will week out other positive role models. Somerby seems to have transferred his resentment toward his mother to women in general. The manosphere tells him it is OK to hate women. But holding such views is ultimately self-defeating if a man is heterosexual. He has no choice but to avoid women or abuse them. That is perhaps sad, but there is no one to blame except Somerby himself, if only for not visiting a shrink at some point. Meanwhile, the manosphere keeps damaged men trapped in a vicious circle that benefits no one but their gurus. To the extent that the manosphere feeds violence against women, it is evil and bad for society.
In fact, there is plenty of scientific research that shows women are attracted to dark triad traits -- what people call "toxicity" and the like. Not understanding, or refusing to admit, that women and men are fundamentally different -- not unequal, but different -- is the single biggest contributor to the divergence of the genders.
DeletePlease cite some of that research. Dark triad traits have nothing to do with similarity or differences.
DeleteIt is a myth that women are attracted to abusers. There is a lot of wrong info circulating in the manosphere. Rapists & pedos always say the victim wanted it.
DeleteJust search "women attraction to dark triad traits"
DeleteAnd yes, there is. The idea that women are "repelled" by men who exhibit these traits is simply false. Men who believe the socially promulgated idea that what women really want is a "nice guy" who will treat them with respect, and then find out the hard way they actually don't, end up on the bitter edges of the manosphere.
No, you said there were studies. Cite one.
DeleteIf you're unable to do a simple search and read the results, you're not worth the effort.
DeleteThose search terms produce nonsense not research findings.
DeleteStudies show most women want to be raped.
DeleteWeirdo.
DeleteTest that idea and you'll go to jail.
DeleteI'm sorry. I phrased that wrong. Studies show most women have rape fantasies.
DeleteEg:
Deletehttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18321031/
Ari Melber talked about it on MSNOW.
David Brooks wrote his last column for the NY Times last January and he is going to work for The Atlantic. No wonder Somerby now thinks they are human.
ReplyDelete