NO PEOPLE...: "They were always so happy and so polite!"

WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 2026

What the neighbor said: "They were always so happy and so polite," their neighbor in Biddeford, Maine has now said.   

They were a husband and wife and a 3-year-old child. The New York Times is reporting the neighbor's recollection in yesterday's news report:   

Colombian Immigrant Killed by ICE in Maine Had Legal Status, Father Says

The father of a Colombian immigrant shot and killed by a federal agent in Maine on Monday described him as “a good person raised with strong values,” who worked two jobs to support his wife and 3-year-old daughter.

“He had a great vision for getting ahead, so many dreams to fulfill,” Omar Duran, the father of Joan Sebastian Guerrero, told Noticias Caracol, a Colombian news outlet, on Tuesday, speaking in Spanish. “My son is a wonderful son—I don’t know why they did that to him.”

Mr. Guerrero, 25, lived in Biddeford, a small city south of Portland, where he worked as a food delivery driver and a late-night cleaner at a veterinary clinic. Mr. Duran said his son was in the United States legally.

[...]

“They were always so happy and so polite,” Don Gregoire, 69, a hairstylist, said of Mr. Guerrero and his wife. “I’d be watering my flowers in front of the house, and they would stop and say, ‘Very nice flowers.’ And their little girl would wave.”  

Did the deceased "have legal status?" As far as we know, that still isn't clear. It's also true that many people seem to have learned, in the past eighteen months, that "legal status" under one president may suddenly be something different under the subsequent president.   

“They were always so happy and so polite,” their neighbor has told the Times. Polite may often follow from happy, and it's good to be happy and young. 

Hemingway wrote about happy and young in his beautiful recollection, A Moveable Feast. In its original version, the memoir ends with this:  

A Moveable Feast

[...] 

This is never any ending to Paris and the memory of each person who has lived in it differs from that of any other. We always returned to it no matter who we were or how it was changed or with what difficulties, or ease, it could be reached. Paris was always worth it and you received return for whatever you brought to it. But this is how Paris was in the early days when we were very poor and very happy.   

That's the memoir's final paragraph. Until the sudden astonishing end of the story, he and Hadley were poor and happy, and they were very young.   

No people are uninteresting, Yevtushenko said. We came upon his poem in a book, way back when we ourselves were somewhat younger. When we first read it, we found it deeply moving in a way we still do, though we still can't begin to say why.   

No people are uninteresting! We'll change one word in the translation as we recall the way the poem starts:

People   

No people are uninteresting.
Their fate is like the chronicle of planets
Nothing in them is not particular,
and planet is dissimilar from planet.
And if a [person] lived in obscurity
making his friends in that obscurity
obscurity is not uninteresting.

Or if a person lived "in obscurity" complimenting his neighbor's flowers as he walked down the street with his wife and his 3-year-old child.  

(Many people in southern Maine grow flowers in their shorter, cooler summers. We've seen it with our own eyes.)   

No people are uninteresting! Presumably, Yevtushenko was thinking of the millions lost under Stalin, or of the tens of thousands of men, women and childrennone of them uninterestingmassacred at Babi Yar.   

Presumably, that's who he mainly had in mind. Presumably, though, he was also thinking of this young couple in Maine, and of their 3-year-old child.   

That said:   

Can it possibly be true? In the simplest colloquial sense, can it be true that no people are uninteresting? None of us people at all?

How about the furious fellow whose video rant was recently reposted by the sitting president? As we noted yesterday afternoon, the 49-minute rant started off like this:   

DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM MUST BE CRIMINALIZED; LEADERS DEPORTED  

Right now in America, politically, we are in the late stage of the disease of Communism. The smirking con man from Uganda had the audacity to sit behind George Washington's desk in New York City the other day, basically declaring a revolution on America, surrounded by no Americans, none of them were citizens. 

These were all invaders.  

I'm going to tell you a story today about a little man, just like this smirking bastard in New York City, named Pol Pot...  

And so on from there. For the record, this man chose "Savage" as his pen name. Over the weekend, the sitting president chose to report his 49-minute rant on his own Truth Social site.

At this site, we're willing to wait to see how Mayor Mamdani's tenure turns out. According to the furious Michael Savage, the mayor is a "smirking bastard"a smirking con man from Ugandawho is planning to oversee the slaughter of millions of people, just as Pol Pot did.  

No people are uninteresting? Does Michael Savage count? And how about the high official who chose to repost that rant?  

Regarding the high official in question, we've suggested that it would be effective politics, and more accurate on the merits, to pity him for his "mental disorders." 

We've suggested that a (serious) mental illness is, in fact, an illness. We've also said that we would guess that his niece's assessment is right:   

BURNETT (2/26/26): You've known him your whole life. Do you actually see a decline?

MARY TRUMP: I do, but I think it's important to remember that Donald has never been fit in any capacity. Obviously, what we're dealing with now are age-related cognitive declines. We're dealing with physical issues that the White House tries to cover over.

But this is somebody who for decades now has had serious, undiagnosed and untreated psychiatric disorders, which are only going to worsen, especially given the pressure he's under and given the cognitive and physical declines.   

For the longer exchange with CNN's Erin Burnett, you can just click here.

In the passage posted above, Mary Trump said her uncle is experiencing an obvious cognitive decline, layered atop decades of untreated psychiatric disorders. She went into much more detail in her best-selling 2020 family memoir, Too Much and Never Enough

"No people are uninteresting?" As he blusters and keeps changing his mind, does her uncle count?    

The so-called democratization of mediathe rise in technologies which Jeffrey Rosen has now discussedhas brought many savage voices into the public square. At present, we'd say that most of these voices come from Red America, but those of us in Blue America have our own decidedly mixed track record.   

Is there a way to get out of this messa way "back out of all this now too much for us?" For today, we'll return to what one Maine resident said:   

"They were always so happy and so polite." 

They were always so happy and so polite! So how do we deal with this mess?

Tomorrow: Additional people

75 comments:

  1. "Did the deceased "have legal status?" As far as we know, that still isn't clear. It's also true that many people seem to have learned, in the past eighteen months, that "legal status" under one president may suddenly be something different under the subsequent president. "

    Why would Somerby doubt their status? This knee-jerk tendency to side with an obviously corrupt administration is one of Somerby's worst traits. It is up to ICE to show that this man did not have legal status (preferably before shooting him dead). We do not live in a society where people must show their papers upon demand.

    Somerby belief that the president can change the legal status of people at will is also wrong. Trump has not changed anyone's legal status, except by terminating a special asylum program for Haitians and Venezuelans (which is not the same as being a permanent resident or immigrant). It takes legislation to change immigration status, not a presidential whim or fiat. No Democratic Socialist leaders are going to be deported. That is a red pipe dream expressed by nutcases. Why does Somerby entertain these statements as if they were anything more than noise?

    Trump is not interesting. He is horrifying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Showing papers is too cumbersome. Shoot first and ask questions later. USA!

      Delete
    2. Don’t even ask questions.

      Delete
  2. If Somerby were a person in my circle of acquaintances, I would have nothing to do with him. He is himself demented. His reactions to each day's ugly news are weirdly off center. He holds no good, decent opinions and has no sense of outrage about what the right is doing these days. It would feel bad to be around him, to hear him say the kinds of things he says every day here, as if he were serious and not a blood-thirsty UFC-admiring asshole.

    I have no doubt that Somerby voted for Trump and approves of what Trump and his cronies, the blighted ignorant MAGAs have been doing. He could not say the things he does here without being a warped person who would vote for scum.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. anon 9:43, you "have no doubt that [TDH] voted for Trump" - just like Trump has no doubt that he won the 2020 election.

      Delete
    2. And that there is "no doubt" a Republican voter who isn't a bigot.

      Delete
    3. 9:43 completely agree. Somerby is such a gloomy right wing asshole.

      Delete
  3. "For today, we'll return to what one Maine resident said:

    "They were always so happy and so polite."

    Why does it sound like Somerby is gloating?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a very good question that you should ask yourself -- What is it about you that leads you to conclude Somerby is gloating?

      Delete
    2. I'm rubber and you are glue.

      Delete
    3. Somerby's raison d'etre is to finger wag at and then feel morally superior to Dems.

      Delete
  4. For Pete's sake! The point isn't to back out of what is happening because we feel overwhelmed -- it is to fight what is happening and change it for the better, because we know what should and needs to be done and have the will to do it. The left is not clueless. We know how to fix this.

    We need elections not dominated by billionaire money and foreign meddling, so that we can put Democrats back in office. Then we will undo all the bad changes Trump has been making and put the country back on course, as it was during Biden's term. We will start by restoring Bear Ears national monument and the Escalante Plateau, then restore public health measures to prevent cyclospora on vegetables. We will protect our kids from measles. We will restore scientific research funding. And we will erase every single harmful measure persecuting immigrants and the poor. And so on, until every vestige of Trump's administration is gone. And we will prosecute corruption, as we failed to do under Biden.

    Somerby says it is all too much for him, but it is not to much for the rest of us. All we have to do is vote for Democrats.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It isn't all we have to do. We need to recognize and improve Democrats too, but it is a good start.

      Delete
  5. This blog attracts vile comments.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe you are visiting the wrong blog.

      Delete
    2. For sure I’m visiting the wrong blog.

      Delete
    3. It's what I do you fucking idiot. I only comment on retarded sites that have no comment moderation.

      Delete
    4. I quickly get banned from decent sites.

      Delete
    5. This is a right wing vanity blog.

      The comments from the right wing trolls/fanboys are hardly surprising.

      Delete
  6. Why does Somerby further Mike Savage's message by reprinting it here in his own blog? Are these words that need a wider audience? It is easy enough to summarize and then refute them, instead of broadcasting them to his own audience.

    If you found a pile of dogshit on the sidewalk, you wouldn't bring it into the house to show your family, to prove it actually existed out there. You would clean it up. If you did bring it into your home, people would suspect you had a weird attraction to dog shit, just as I suspect Somerby is happy to pass along Savage's words and is just protesting a bit too much when he gives us every loathsome word of what Savage said, smelly and slimey in its fullness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha! On point and funny analogy.

      Delete
  7. A family man working two jobs? The worst of the worst! They come here and suck up "goodies" (for which they are not, in fact, eligible, but never let the truth interfere with riling up the rubes! Need their votes so those tax cuts will go through!).

    I'd rather live with this guy as a neighbor than someone so talentless and without morals the best job they can get is working for ICE.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To be fair, after 30 years in, let's say, actuary work, one can no longer find work in the field, and being older and overqualified can not get a job even as a delivery driver or in fast food.

      The job market is dead, especially for those that are older - post 50 - and needing a second career.

      The employment numbers this last year are atrocious.

      Delete
  8. How is Russia both a paper tiger and an imminent threat of accomplishing a full military takeover of Europe? How does that work? Logically speaking. Or are these just words on a screen? Toy soldiers, maneuvered by children playing a game? Do tell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How is a fire dangerous when it can be put out?

      Delete
    2. Not "dangerous". Capable of a full military takeover of Europe.

      Delete
    3. Did Somerby mention Russia in this post?

      Delete
    4. How can Russia take over Europe if it cannot defeat Ukraine?

      Delete
    5. Why are you talking about Russia?

      Delete
    6. Taking over Europe would qualify as "dangerous," at least, if you're a European and see the shithole that is Russia.

      Delete
    7. Russia is either a paper tiger or an imminent threat to take over all of Europe depending on the argument being made. Those are the shifting sands of logic upon which we have all been thrust here by our friendly neighborhood righteously indignant partisan media consumers whose ego's rest completely on their preferred political party being portrayed as virtuous.

      Delete
    8. Russia defeated Nazi Germany.

      Delete
    9. Russia can’t seem to succeed in Ukraine after 4 years, but that doesn’t mean they haven’t inflicted a lot of damage and loss of life there. It isn’t an either-or situation.

      Delete
    10. Ukraine could have steered clear of NATO. Just sayin’.

      Delete
    11. Russia should have steered clear of Ukraine. Just sayin'

      Delete
    12. The $70 billion of taxpayer money Democratic and Republican politicians have handed over to Ukraine has played a part in staving off their defeat. Even though we could use that money here to help voters and citizens, some people are afraid that the paper tiger Russia will invade and rule all of Europe without it. One of those war is peace kind of deals.

      Delete
    13. "Even though we could use that money here to help voters and citizens..."

      And be called"Communists" by a bunch of white supremacists?
      Better to save Ukraine from the people blackmailing Trump and the Republican Congress.

      Delete
    14. The USSR didn't take over all of Europe. The USSR did make all of Europe, in fact the entire world, a shittier place, and the USSR set parts of Europe back by decades. Next logical fallacy troll, please.

      Delete
    15. 1:40 - 90% of that $$ was spent here to make stuff to blow up Russian invaders. Russian casualties are approaching 1.5 million, with over 12,000 tanks destroyed. After taking out hundreds of air defense systems Ukrainian drones have destroyed 40% of Russia's refining capacity. Recently Ukrainian drones have been hitting sanctioned oil and gas tankers, something like 120 in two weeks. They are awesome innovators. If we had any sense at all we would cut the defence budget in half and concentrate on cheap drones, not $200 million Predator drones. Fuck Putin. Fuck traitor Trump.

      Delete
    16. The USSR defeated Nazi Germany. That historical fact can’t be erased.

      Delete
    17. The world's second greatest Army invaded Ukraine and is getting its ass handed to them. That historical fact can’t be erased..

      Delete
    18. I'm glad to see you are so excited about the casualties and billions we are spending.

      Delete
    19. Paper tiger does not mean no threat exists - Russia has the largest stockpile of nuclear weapons.

      So while generally speaking Russia's military and specifically Putin are paper tigers in most respects, they are also loose cannons that still require others to have some preparation.

      However, the effort required to defeat Russia/Putin is now quite minimal, this is one of the main takeaways from the Ukraine war. Duh.

      Granted you may need to have a triple digit IQ to grasp this distinction, but if you do have a triple digit IQ, then it is quite trivial and obvious.

      Delete
    20. My IQ is an irrational number, it has infinitely many digits.

      Delete
    21. Only after a decimal point, so that does not necessarily suggest "a triple digit IQ" - meaning ≥100.

      Go eat a slice of humble π.

      Delete
    22. I was referring to their capabilities of a full military takeover and occupation of Europe, the threat of which has been suggested to be a reason to send scores of billions of dollars of our money to Ukraine, notoriously one of the most corrupt countries on Earth.

      Delete
    23. Fuck Russian trolls. They got nothing else to do as they have no gas. Haha.

      Delete
    24. If Russia is a paper tiger and the effort to defeat them is minimal, why do we have to pay for it? What threat would they be to Europe if that is true?

      Delete
    25. Ukraine is Europe. Poland is Europe. Georgia is Europe. The Baltic nations are Europe. Hungary is Europe. Romania is Europe.

      Why do you keep asking the same questions no matter how many times they've been answered? Because you're a troll.

      Delete
    26. 5:31 you present a non sequitur.

      Russia can be a paper tiger - it is - and still require some money and effort to defeat.

      For example, recall the Wagner incident where a ragged army of a few thousand men threatened Putin and had him quaking in his boots and he totally backed down - you know, like a paper tiger.

      Putin later got his revenge by murdering their leader on a plane flight. So Russia/Putin are still a threat in some limited way; their opponents should steer clear of windows on higher floors, but that is pretty puny.

      Other countries are not paper tigers, for example no country is going to invade the continental US or China or the UK, because everyone knows those are not places to mess with. But after Ukraine, everyone knows Russia/Putin is a paper tiger; they can easily be invaded and defeated but of course it will take some funds and effort.

      If you are trying to make a claim that ignorant people like you can make moronic comments like you have, ok, you have proven your point.

      Delete
  9. I take issue with Somerby's return to Yevtusheko's claim about people. Somerby says:

    ""No people are uninteresting?" As he blusters and keeps changing his mind, does her uncle [Trump] count?"

    Here is the definition of interesting:

    ""Interesting" is an adjective used to describe something that holds your attention or arouses curiosity. It typically implies a subject or object is engaging, unusual, or stimulating."

    Can we say that Trump is any of that? Not exactly. He is horrifying, deplorable, ugly, banal (in the sense that there is a banality of evil), wrong. But not interesting. We would turn away from Trump if he didn't hold our lives in his hands, if he weren't hurting people, breaking the law and destroying our country (and now Iran, Ukraine, NATO, and others worldwide). People who find this interesting need to question their own motives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree.

      The line from the poem speaks to those frightened over being inconsequential.

      Delete
  10. F*uckups in context:

    ICE has been enormously successful. Since Trump took office, the number of illegal immigrants ICE has deported or arrested or otherwise gotten to leave the country is over 2,500,000. In these millions of interactions, an occasional, tragic mistake has occurred.

    https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/12/10/thanks-president-trump-and-secretary-noem-more-25-million-illegal-aliens-left-us

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The number of Americans killed each year in large truck accidents involving illegal immigrants may be in the hundreds.

      The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) mandates English proficiency for CDL holders, requiring drivers to read signs and understand regulations (Web ID 3). Yet, as Web ID 1 (ckflaw.com) reports, hundreds of truckers lack sufficient English skills, causing “dangerous and potentially deadly situations.” Non-English-speaking drivers—many of whom are undocumented—cannot read signs for lane closures, hazardous conditions, or city-specific rules, leading to accidents. The NHTSA reports that large truck crashes killed 5,700 people in 2023, with 15% of fatal crashes (814 deaths) involving drivers with language barriers or inadequate training (NHTSA, 2024). The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) adds that 1 in 7 fatal truck crashes in 2023 involved a driver with a non-U.S. license or unknown documentation status, often linked to these issues.

      Delete
    2. Traffic signs should be in Hebrew.

      Delete
    3. So, 85% of the fatal accidents do not involve “illegal immigrants” in any way? Is that what you’re saying? Of the 15% that might involve “undocumented immigrants”, how many actually involve undocumented immigrants?

      Commercial truck drivers taken together in the United States log 300 billion miles every year in total. You can use your actuarial skills to figure out what percentage of the voluminous number of trips involve fatal accidents.

      Who is hiring these undocumented immigrants, if it’s true that they really are being hired to drive trucks? Why are they being hired? Why are the people hiring them not being targeted by ice?

      Delete
    4. D in C - you ignore all the negatives of the deportations. there is a cruelty to what this is doing. Some people are shipped off to countries where they have never been and don't speak the language. The Trump administration imposes quotas for daily arrests by ICE agents. Undocumented aliens do work that US citizens don't want, for low pay/ Yet they pay taxes and social security while being ineligible to ever collect. Nursing homes, hospitals, group homes for the disabled depend significantly on undocumented staff. The birth rate of US citizens is in serious decline. The hard right is unwilling to make any compromise to address this serious issue by authorizing some type of reasonable compromise. What about undocumented who came over as children. The MAGA administration uses vile propaganda top demonize immigrants. It's a good thing for you that Trump wasn't in charge when your forebears came to the US. That said, the "blue" side seems to go overboard in the other direction. We do have laws, yet it seems the approach is to not enforce them. There are valid reasons to oppose unrestricted immigration. I would note that Obama and Biden administrations deported a lot of people. You seem to immersed yourself in right wing propaganda, much of which is ghastly.

      Delete
    5. DiC - no fucking shame and proud of it

      Delete
    6. October 7th was 1 measly day out of 365, but that won't deter Israel from committing genocide.

      Delete
    7. I was really hoping DiC was dead.

      Delete
    8. Has anyone seen any difference in their day to day life with the deportation of 2.5M people? I mean conservatives have been clamoring for years and now we are up to 2.5M assuming DiC is correct, and honestly, I have not seen one lick of difference in my daily life that I can attribute to this. Please, someone tell me what it is all for?

      Delete
    9. The intellectual paucity of a person who is not able to see the difference between accidents and state-sanctioned execution is just staggering; it defies all attempts to understand it. Not to mention that the statistic itself is misleading, as mentioned above.
      ICE just shot a random person in front of his wife and three year-old daughter. Yet, we should accept it as something that contributes to a greater good. Un-fucking-believable.

      Delete
    10. "Has anyone seen any difference in their day to day life" the fuckers have devastated the Somalian marketplace in Minneapolis. Also too, it's less than 0.1% of the USA population. So it is localized in brown communities . Glad everything is all white with you. Fucking assholes anyway.

      Delete
    11. @3.42 you assume i am white and that i live in a white community...for the record, the City I live in is about 45% hispanic/latino, 30% white, 16% black, 5% asian, and the rest "other'. about 1/3 of the population is foreign born.

      I was trying to get to the point of the fact that conservatives have said that illegal immigration is the reason for all the ails of this country from crime to budget deficits to everything else. so here we are, 2.5M deportations in. Has crime been reduced because of it? has the budget deficit been reduced? That's the only point I was getting at. that illegal immigration is not the silver bullet it has been portrayed to be. And you are yelling at me but ultimately, I think we are on the same side.

      In case it's not clear, I am not for deportations, I am not for donald trump, and i am not for shooting people. Stop yelling at me please.

      Delete
    12. 2:18

      "DiC" represents comments from a troll farm, it is not an actual individual.

      Delete
    13. Anybody dumb enough to believe DHS numbers, I've got a bridge to sell you.

      Delete
    14. I need a good bridge. Let’s talk.

      Delete
    15. I remember David in the 90s was here claiming to be retired and living off social security.

      David is a character - literally, nothing he says is genuine or accurate.

      Delete
    16. "Have you seen the bridge?"

      "I ain't seen the bridge!"

      "Where's that confounded bridge?"

      The Crunge (1973)
      https://youtu.be/W711RXvFwmI?si=htvLDeBF7t6lQ1he

      Delete
    17. If Ronald Reagan was alive today, he could only shake his head at DiC and say, 'there you go again.'

      They aren't 'fuckups' and they aren't 'tragic mistakes'. They are murders.

      Delete
  11. Any Democrat voting for this needs to be primaried:

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/house-republicans-push-90-billion-iran-war-election-measures-farm-aid-rcna587635

    ReplyDelete