THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2026
Then too, what happened in Florida: Will this unusual election year become a key part of the story? A key part of the evolving, imperfect American story?
A logger in Maine, a preacher in Kansas? An improbable giant-slayer in the former nation known as Texas? A pair of (lady) Democratic doctors flipping states believed to be red?
Will this year become a part of American history? For obvious reasons, Scott Colom's win in Mississippi is generating headlines like these, as seen online today in the New York Times:
Scott Colom, a Democrat, Wins Mississippi Senate Seat in Historic Upset
Mr. Colom, a prosecutor, will be the first Black senator elected from Mississippi since the post-Civil War Reconstruction period.
Even there, those headlines stress the fact of party offer the fact of race. Atop the front page of today's print editions, the pair of headlines flips the point of emphasis:
Colom Attains A Major Upset In Mississippi
Elected As Its First Black Senator Since 1800s
As indeed he was, at the age of 43. But which is the more newsworthy part of this upset? His party or his "race?"
Candidate Colom came through for the win. A great deal of the pain of American history is centered in Deep South states like the state from which he's emerged.
That said, we were struck last night, watching reaction on cable news shows, by the numbers of young Black Mississippians expressing their ongoing dedication to the state they regard as their home. Colom himself, at the end of his victory speech, made it clear that he was there to serve "every Mississippian—the ones that voted for me, the ones that didn't vote for me, and the ones that didn't vote."
"Mississippi matters," he said. He didn't sound like someone who saw himself as part of a winning tribe.
There were "firsts" all over the electoral map this year. In fact, there were so many that many such "firsts" have attracted barely a word of notice. We think, for example, David Crowley, governor-elect of Wisconsin, and of Debra Haaland, governor-elect of New Mexico.
Crowley and Haaland are both firsts, but in the flood of other such firsts, that fact has received little notice. For the record, Governor-elect Crowley will be the first Black governor of his state. Governor-elect Haaland will be the first Native American woman governor of any American state—and so on from there.
There were many firsts this year. That said, is the age of firsts perhaps reaching its end? Will that be a part of this year's story—a part of the evolving American story?
"These are the days of miracle and wonder?" (Paul Simon, Graceland album.) In a report last week for the New York Times, Jia Lynn Yang starts trying to puzzle it out:
NEWS ANALYSIS
They Made History as ‘Firsts.’ That’s Not What They Ran On.
The first Muslim senator. The first Black woman to be elected governor of any state. The first openly gay male senator. The first Black governor of Florida. The first elected Hispanic governors in Texas and in California.
The number of “firsts” achieved on Tuesday’s elections was extraordinary. Barriers came crashing down across the country. And yet during the campaigns, the candidates themselves hardly uttered a word about being on the precipice of history. There were no exhortations to vote for a particular person because “representation matters.”
Instead, most of them spoke relentlessly about household finances that had become impossible to manage, an unpopular war and corruption. They did not—and could not—hide their identities. But these facts were not central to their pitches to voters.
This is a major shift in the politics of identity...
Yang goes on in somewhat jumbled fashion from there, suggesting that we live in a new and different America: Even as the sitting president "has continued insulting entire racial and ethnic groups," Yang says that Democratic candidates "have downplayed identity" in the course of this year's campaigns.
It seems to us that Yang is hearing something which is actually there. She closes with a possible explanation for what she believes she has heard:
[I]n a way, the long-awaited demographic turnover finally arrived in American politics this week. The slate of winners broke so many barriers in part because the country itself has become far more diverse. Since opening up to immigrants from around the world in the second half of the 20th century, the country is now generations deep into a whole new demographic reality.
Baby Boomers, who have long dominated the country’s political scene, are about 70 percent white. Millennials are around half. Gen-Z is more ethnically and racially diverse than any generation in American history. People like Mr. El-Sayed (42 years old), Sen. Jon Ossoff in Georgia (39) and James Talarico in Texas (37) have simply grown up in a different country.
The story this week, then, is not only about racial or gender demographics. It’s about the arrival of a new generation. For these Americans, diversity is not a campaign slogan. It’s a simple fact of life.
In this portrait, America is moving away from "identity." Increasingly, talent is understood to emerge from every part of this sprawling, demographically complex nation, from every identifiable group.
Increasingly, voters understand this fact. Increasingly, nobody cares about which group a talented candidate hails from.
Inevitably, some firsts are still more noteworthy than others. Colom's first in Mississippi is a difficult first to ignore. Last night, he promised to carry his whole state into its future, not just members of his own political or racial group.
That said, another first should perhaps be hard to ignore—and Yang mentions it in her opening paragraph. We refer to her citation of "the first Black governor of Florida."
We wouldn't have voted for him ourselves, but a lot of Republicans did. We think his election helps flesh out an American story we Blues have unwisely ignored.
In the 2026 U.S. midterm elections, approximately 94% of U.S. counties shifted toward Democratic candidates compared to the 2024 presidential election, according to data from The New Republic.
ReplyDeleteMakes a person wonder what the fuck is Somerby thinking when he writes crap like this: "nobody cares about which group a talented candidate hails from." Is it time we pity Bob?
DeleteLong past time.
Delete"A group including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth broke decorum and was loudly admonished by the Army sentinel at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at Arlington National Cemetery on Wednesday."
ReplyDeleteBut at least he can order bombs to be dropped against defenseless third-world countries.
The person who laughed is a woman.
DeleteThe Hill says: "Hegseth was accompanied by his wife, Jennifer Hegseth, his chief of staff, Ricky Buria, deputy chief of staff Patrick Weaver and senior adviser Tami Radabaugh. It is unclear who laughed, but the incident was caught on television and went viral online. "
DeleteTo regain control of the situation, Hegseth awarded the sentinel a prestigious medal. Handing such medals out like candy, for political purposes, also shows disrespect for military sacrifice, in my opinion. That is why we shouldn't have morons in charge of the Defense Dept.
Hegseth takes his wife everywhere and allows her to conduct meetings for him. What's up with that?
DeleteHegseth has his own human binky. Perhaps Hegseth's wife performs the same services for him as Natalie does for Trump?
DeleteI don’t know what the medal is or whether it’s appropriate, but the soldier deserves some recognition for reprimanding the secretary’s party.
DeleteDo you really think that telling someone to keep it down deserves a medal when there are veterans who risked their lives to save the lives of others in battle who are typically the recipients of combat medals? This is like giving out a purple heart for a paper cut, or for being treated for STDs, as Trump brags he deserved a Purple Heart for his exposure.
DeleteThere is stolen valor but there is also watered down (diluted) valor and just-doing-their-job non-valor. Trump doesn't care whether medals or trophies or praise is earned or not. He just wants it and they give it to him. This is more in that vein. Meaningless trophies are fool's gold. It dishonors a service member to award such a trophy. And it spits on the legitimate trophies won by veterans for genuine bravery under fire.
Not all decorations are for valor. Some are for service.
Delete
ReplyDelete"Candidate Colom came through for the win."
No, Bob. Neither candidate Colom nor any other Dumbocrat pol "came through for the win". Rs fucked up, and, in a two-party system, that means that the other party wins the elections. The worse the fuckup the bigger the win.
Which mean that all this Dumbocrat candidate needed for "coming through" was a name that can fit on the ballot. That's all.
Thanks, Ghislaine. btw how's the pilates class?
DeleteAh, so our resident Mao admits that the R’s fucked up, royally! I say “Amen!” to that!
DeleteCalling someone a woman is not the deep insult you think it is @11:50. Indiscriminately calling unknown people pedophiles (like Ghislaine Maxwell) cheapens what is a serious crime of sex trafficking that we should care about, not use for trolling.
DeleteI stand in solidarity with 11:50.
DeleteI didn't call someone a 'woman'. I called them 'Ghislaine', a very specific woman.
DeleteAnd there was nothing indiscriminate about my use of 'Ghislaine' nor was I applying it to an unknown person since this is our very own trumptard, about which we know a great deal.
I agree with 12:56.
DeleteIt is becoming too stupid to reply.
DeleteI’m stupid. Reply to me.
DeleteEvidently you're too stupid.
DeleteI replied to you. In simple fairness, you must reply to me.
DeleteThe Daily Howler is irrelevant when Jensen Huang has resigned.
ReplyDeleteHuang is yet another person who was forced to resign from an organization that he founded, nurtured and led. There are more people like this than one might suspect. My ex-boss in Bermuda was one. The heads of two non-profits that I donate to also had this happen to them
DeleteDavid, you were prudent. You never founded any organization.
DeletePeople who found organizations should never subsequently be held to any standards, such as not sharing info with foreign spies.
DeletePeople who found organizations should not be bound by marital vows.
DeleteYou mean that fucking criminal in Bermuda, dickhead?
DeleteNvidia has 42,000+ employees. Jensen Huang resigning makes no fucking difference to the company. It's not like he's doing engineering work for them.
DeleteHe was too dumb to notice that he was funneling chips to an obvious front company. Now, is it that big of a deal that the Chinese get their hands on some advanced GPUs? Probably not. On the other hand, if the US official policy was subverted because Lutnick and Trump needed to line their own pockets or prop up the market for a political gain, that is a much bigger deal.
Trump, apparently thinking he was offering some kind of exoneration, stated that Huang told him he had "absolutely no idea" the woman he had an affair with was a Chinese operative, before adding "and I believe him."
DeleteTo the extent Huang was uaware she was a spy, it is more likely he would have imparted valuable info to her. If he had had suspicions, he would have been more guarded.
So Trump's exoneration is actually a condemnation. But, big surprise, he's too stupid to see that.
Good point
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeletePretty much everyone in the state department knew that Alice Huang was some sort of an operative.
DeletePS: It was the best of times for Huang. It was the worst times for Huang.
Huang is a common name.
DeleteIt's a Tale of Two Huangs.
DeleteYou wonder how he gets all those girlfriends? You should see the size of his Haung. Sorry, that was so Wong.
DeleteDavid in Cal, why does a guy get fired for simply screwing a Chinese spy???; who he illegally sold tens of billions of chips to? Pathetic, even for a loser like you David.
DeleteSomerby says Mississippi is no longer burning. The election of Colom does not mean white Republicans are no longer trying to gerrymander away black votes, nor does it mean that the VRA is no longer needed. It does not imply that race relations in the South have improved or even materially changed. Yes, black voters came out in greater numbers due to Republican efforts to suppress black votes. It would be nice if that were to continue, but a backlash does not mean the effort to suppress black votes has ended.
ReplyDeleteSomerby is clueless when it comes to race relations and has consistently been on the wrong side of race-related controversies here on his blog. This is another instance where he makes a tone-deaf statement out of ignorance.
Well we learned MS goddamn disenfranchised 250,000 ballots or so by using a shitty privatized database instead of the USPS, and mailed generic postcards in hopes of them being thrown out, and in doing so the person removed from the voting rolls. Dems are getting good at getting disenfranchised voters to vote provisionally, that is why it took so long to cure the votes. In a bigger margin these votes are not even counted. Just more of your typical Repuke ratfucking as they concentrate the mailings in blue districts. Haha losers!
DeleteAfter Callais, Somerby tried to school us “woke” blues that Republicans weren’t trying to disenfranchise black voters because they’re black. No, they wanted to disenfranchise black voters because they vote for democrats. To a rational person, the disenfranchisement was happening to black voters, regardless of gop sophistry.
DeleteSomerby is tiresome.
DeleteAs usual for Republicans, Somerby is a bit over-eager to proclaim the civil rights era over because racism is no longer a thing. That IS a right wing talking point that Somerby has promoted here before.
ReplyDeleteRacism yesterday, racism today, racism tomorrow!
DeleteOf course nothing in Somerby's post implies that he thinks racism is no longer a thing, but don't let that stop you.
DeleteRemember when everyone was saying that Trump couldn't be racist because he appointed Omarosa, then he fired her and she wrote a book about how racist her experiences at the White House were? Saying that the election of Byron McDonalds as FL governor means racism is over is just like that. Trump and the Republicans think that their token black "friends" show that they cannot be racist, while they systematically dismantle DEI and fire the black generals. It is their little joke on black America and Somerby plays right into it today with his cheering.
DeleteMeanwhile, over at Mediaite, conservative opinion writer Brad Slager suggested that Wes Moore, Governor of Maryland (where Somerby lives) didn't earn his Bronze Star, choosing Veteran's Day to say so. THAT is how Republicans behave on a day when they should be honoring veterans, not calling the black heroes dishonorable because their paperwork wasn't processed properly back in 2006. The three-star general who led Moore's outfit ultimately corrected the oversight but Brad Slager insists that means Moore wasn't worthy.
This is how the Republican right behaves toward veterans and no, the fight against racism is not over.
Hegseth has been quite busy getting rid of Black people from command positions in the armed forces.
DeleteSomerby makes several statements implying that racism is no longer an American problem, such as this one:
Delete"In this portrait, America is moving away from "identity." Increasingly, talent is understood to emerge from every part of this sprawling, demographically complex nation, from every identifiable group."
and this one:
"We wouldn't have voted for him ourselves, but a lot of Republicans did. We think his election helps flesh out an American story we Blues have unwisely ignored."
And he bends Colom's pledge to work hard for all of his constituents into a supposed claim that things have changed for black people in Mississippi:
"Increasingly, voters understand this fact. Increasingly, nobody cares about which group a talented candidate hails from..
Inevitably, some firsts are still more noteworthy than others. Colom's first in Mississippi is a difficult first to ignore. Last night, he promised to carry his whole state into its future, not just members of his own political or racial group."
And he notes in his headline that Mississippi is "no longer burning," which is a reference to an important civil rights film about murders that were not prosecuted even though everyone knew who had done them, because the victims were black.
The Republican backlash against civil rights progress, Trump's visceral hatred for Obama, the expulsion of immigrants based on their skin color (where Trump admits white South Africans but deports black citizens), the persecution of Ilhan Omar because she came here from Somalia and Trump's ongoing disgusting comments about African nations. All of this shows and far outweighs the fortunate election of a single black man in a racially gerrymandered state that is 40% black during a blue tsunami.
Racism is not over and it is insulting when Somerby points to these trivial examples while ignoring the ICE persecution of dark skinned people in a racially hostile environment across the nation.
Anyone who thinks Somerby isn't suggesting that Democrats needs to rethink identity politics in the context of this sweeping victory needs to go back and reread his essay, then think about prior Somerby essays where he opposed Democratic concerns about racism. He wrote an essay supporting the parents in Boston who were against busing for racial equality. He has consistently opposed efforts to desegregate NYC's schools to allow more black students in elite science high schools. He once suggested that black students shouldn't be given scholarships for athletics to open entry universities, because they wouldn't be able to compete and would struggle too much academically. He suggested that black students concerned about microaggressions were experiencing too little daily racism and had to make up trivial slights in order to feel discriminated against. He opposed summer training for racial sensitivity in college programs. He wrote that Kamala Harris had a nice smile but was a bad campaigner because she didn't interview well and was avoiding interviews (a verifiable untruth). He has routinely objected to anyone being called racist, including obvious racists, as a matter of Demcoratic tactics in elections, claiming that we Dems were pushing red voters toward Trump by embracing civil rights issues.
The historic races this midterm have been the number of female candidates being elected, especially to governorships.
DeleteSomerby has never written here about women's issues, especially women's health (and abortion rights), domestic violence, and Trump's DEI firings of women in high positions earned through performance.
Black and gender issues both motivated the blue tsunami.
DeleteSelby,
Deleteread your entire post. Completely unconvincing. Somerby is innocent of all charges.
Anything is possible, 2:44.
Delete@2:44, there is more that could have been mentioned.
DeleteSomerby is clearly guilty of what hasn’t been mentioned.
DeleteSomerby long ago convinced deadrat that he, Somerby, was a racist. He was a tougher sell than anyone else here.
Delete““an American story we Blues have unwisely ignored”
ReplyDeleteYes, we “blues” have ignored the election of Donalds, if you overlook that major analysis in the New York Times that Somerby quoted.
“They Made History as ‘Firsts.’ That’s Not What They Ran On.”
ReplyDeleteAnd
“most of them spoke relentlessly about household finances that had become impossible to manage, an unpopular war and corruption.”
(Most of them, that is,…, except Donalds)
This passes as news analysis at the New York Times.
JFK didn’t ask voters to elect him because he would be the first Catholic president, now did he? It was recognized after he was elected. Candidates generally … talk about issues. Duh.
It’s also true that Colom prominently featured civil rights leader Medgar Evers in the closing days of his 2026 U.S. Senate campaign, so he was clearly tapping into that history as part of his outreach.
JFK was criticised by the right as a puppet of the vatican.
DeleteAnd el-sayed was labeled a jihadist by the right. He still, as a candidate, asked people to vote for him, based upon the issues that he campaigned on, not on the fact that he would be the first Muslim senator.
DeleteIt’s what a candidate does. Yang acts as if this is a profound insight.
DeleteAt Catholic events JFK would emphasize his shared religion, as would El-Sayed at Muslim community events.
DeleteSo? Neither one asked the general public to vote for them because they would be the first for their respective religions.
DeleteExcessively literal again. Everyone in the general public must be addressed says @3:22, when politicians of all ethnicities and religions emphasize their similarities with voters when it is appropriate. Hillary got criticized because her legitimate Arkansas accent became more Southern when she campaigned in the South. Kamala was criticized because they thought she sounded more black when speaking to a black audience. Race, ethnicity, gender, birthplace, social class all are aspects of identity. They ALL get emphasized when speaking to audiences that share those aspects. People who have more in common with a broader segment of the public have an electoral advantage (i.e., white, male, Christian, middle class (because everyone aspires to be that), etc. Saying that it is unfair for a minority to emphasize their minority identity when speaking to a minority group, is trying to take away an advantage an opponent holds in addressing that group. That is what gerrymandering is about and that is what ridiculing someone for being a minority is about, but it is NOT wrong for minorities to use their identities to connect with communities, neighborhoods, voting blocs and those who perceive them as like themselves. That is how politics works.
DeleteWhen Somerby defines identity politics as wrong, he is trying to remove a key advantage of Democrats, who are made up of a big tent coalition of immigrants, working people, minorities, women, and union members (with a work identity). Of course Somerby wants us to abandon identity politics. It is an advantage Democrats have over Republicans, who do not embrace divergence and thus tend to be more homogenous. We Dems should not listen to people like Somerby, who claim to support us but use every opportunity to work against Democrats.
Is it necessary to point out that this is a way in which Somerby claims to be liberal, one of us, while promoting right wing talking points that would injure Democrats if taken seriously?
DeleteCatholicism is the best faith.
DeleteNo, atheism is the best religion. Prove me wrong.
DeleteAtheism has no Pope.
DeleteMy point, exactly.
DeleteSo we agree, Catholicism is the best faith.
DeleteJust fyi, Donalds, while in Congress, was an election denier and voted against certifying Biden‘s victory.
ReplyDeleteTom Emmer, Republican majority whip of the US House of Representatives:
ReplyDeletethe military should remove Ilhan Omar from Congress;
There should be no burkas;
Somalis seem like such a scar on the face of Minnesota
Also, remember that time Natalie posted an image of Obama as an ape to Trump’s social media account?
It seems unwise to ignore this stuff, which seems like the default position of the GOP.
"A logger in Maine, a preacher in Kansas?"
ReplyDeleteThese choices make sense when you realize that both Republicans and Democrats are trying to avoid corruption. That means avoiding career politicians who are likely to engage in insider trading in stocks or benefit from bribes to their children, spouses or crypto companies. A logger is less likely to have international finance connections and sons-in-law named Jared with Saudi buddies. There does seem to be an assumption that someone who is religious like Talarico will avoid corruption, which is not necessarily true on the right, but it is voter hope that motivates such choices.
For those of us who are disgusted by ICE and its persecution of brown skinned people, even though who are hardworking or have been here since childhood, the hope is that electing someone with a Spanish surname, such as Talarico, will provide a check and balance against Trump's nasty ICE campaign, and against the detention centers being built in the heartland where locals don't want them. Trump radicalized his own base as anti-red Democratic voters by taking for granted that rural and small town voters would accept the disruption of detention activities.
Somerby thinks this is just about the manly qualities of loggers, but it is also about finding candidates who are the opposite of those who have upset red voters. To the extent that Somerby and Republicans think this is only about religion or being salt-of-the-earth, they will not understand the patterns we are seeing in the midterms. Women get elected because they are unlikely to commit sex crimes like rape and assault and because they are not going to engage in the toxic masculine posturing of Hegseth and Kash Patel (setting aside Kristi Noem). Amy Acton won because Vivek was so over-the-top. Republicans and Democrats both are sick of those ugly performances, no matter how much they might please Trump himself.
Somerby wants to reframe this as a transcending of identity politics, but he is mainly confused about the identities that voters are now seeking and the ones being avoided. It is a dangerous misconception to think that voters don't care about traditional identities such as race and ethnicity. Look at the huge movement to remove South-Asian (Indian subcontinent) immigrants to America (right wingers call them dot-heads and J.D. Vance is trying to remake his wife as a Christian tradwife). The right is gung-ho on identity politics when it attacks immigrants and descendents of immigrants, but Somerby race is no longer a discriminated class (or women). He is so wrong about that.
Talarico is an Italian name.
DeleteAll Americans, even indigenous Americans, are descendants of immigrants.
DeleteTroy Jackson, AKA the logger, came to Washington dressed in an $88 dollar suite from Target! My kind of guy!
DeleteTroy Jackson, AKA the logger, came to Washington dressed in an $88 dollar suite from Target! My kind of guy!
DeleteDressed in a suite?
DeleteWhen Obama was elected, the saying was “America: no longer racist.”
ReplyDeleteAnd yet some analysts are saying that Trump would never have run for president if it hadn't been for Obama's election. This whole era may be characterized as a racist backlash to civil rights progress (and women's gains) by future political historians.
DeleteObama ridiculed Trump, who was in the audience, at the White House correspondents’ dinner. Trump did not take it well.
DeleteAKA Trump is a pussy.
DeleteIt’s unwise for democrats to focus so much on Colom and not on Donalds. Because…reasons.
ReplyDelete