THE ART OF THE CON: The problem our heroes will never discuss!

FRIDAY, MAY 6, 2016

Part 4—Our own tribe's art of the con:
Goofus and Gallant are fighting today in the New York Times.

Their columns appears on the same op-ed page. At issue is the way they regard tens of millions of voters.

Goofus likes to generalize about tens of millions of voters. In his hands, they quickly become Those People. He lets his bombs fly:
GOOFUS: I can almost guarantee that we’ll see attempts to sanitize the positions and motives of Trump supporters, to downplay the racism that is at the heart of the movement and pretend that what voters really care about are the priorities of D.C. insiders—a process I think of as “centrification.”

[...]

Trump support in the primaries was strongly correlated with racial resentment: We’re looking at a movement of white men angry that they no longer dominate American society the way they used to. And to pretend otherwise is to give both the movement and the man who leads it a free pass.
To Goofus, Those People are basically all alike—and, of course, they're evil. Amazingly, it even seems that Those People are all men!

Goofus is willing to generalize wildly as he discusses those people. Gallant is much more granular as he discusses some of their millions of lives:
GALLANT: [E]conomic loss has triggered a series of complex spirals...A few decades ago there were 175,000 coal jobs in the U.S. Now there are 57,000. That economic dislocation has hit local economies in the form of shuttered storefronts and abandoned bank buildings.

Everywhere there are local activists trying to rebuild, but it’s hard to hold off the dislocation, distrust and pessimism. Birthrates drop. Family structures erode. Life expectancy falls. People slip between the cracks and inevitably drug use rises. According to The Charleston Gazette-Mail, between 1999 and 2009, per-capita consumption of oxycodone, hydrocodone and fentanyl tripled. By 2009 West Virginians were annually filling 19 painkiller prescriptions a person.

Heavy opioid use often slides over into heroin use. Heroin overdose deaths tripled between 2009 and 2014. In those years the state had the highest drug overdose death rate in the nation.
West Virginia is a state with lots of Trump supporters. To Goofus, that support reflects only one thing—their virulent "racial resentment." (Warning! Shaky academic construct!)

Gallant describes a wider range of phenomena affecting those voters' lives.

Whatever! In our view, neither Goofus nor Gallant penned an especially insightful column today. Instead of scoring their fight, let's look at Paul Krugman's remarks today about the American press corps—about the way the press may cover the presumed Trump-Clinton fight.

Krugman starts his column discussing this topic. Halfway through, his attention wanders.

This frequently happens when we liberals discuss any part of the press which isn't called "Fox News." We liberals love discussing Fox News. But we have a very hard time focusing on the mainstream press, where some of our heroes reside.

In a way, it's just as well that Krugman's attention wandered. He offered very little of value about the press corps' work regarding Trump and Clinton.

How lazy can work like this get? Krugman speculates about what the press corps may do, while failing to note what they've already done! He names the names of no actual journalists. He names no actual news org.

He offers familiar speculations before his attention wanders. A few of our analysts leaped from their carrels as they read these parts of his column. Some of the youngsters even denounced him as a "grown-ass white man."

It's a term they learned from watching Maddow. We cuffed them aside for using the term, while admitting they had a bit of a point in their complaints about Krugman.

"Mother-f**ker!" one of these young people heatedly cried. "Why speculate about possible coverage? Why not mention the crazy things your own paper has already done?"

We explained that Krugman, a Times employee, possibly maybe can't do that. At the same time, we acknowledged that the fiery young analyst had a tiny bit of a point—for example, about this part of Krugman's column:
KRUGMAN (5/6/16): [O]ne candidate is engaged in wildly irresponsible fantasy while the other is being quite careful with her numbers. But beware of news analyses that, in the name of “balance,” downplay this contrast.
Have you seen any "news analyses" which have "downplayed this contrast" between Trump and Clinton? We aren't sure we have.

We have seen something much more remarkable. We've seen the New York Times and the Washington Post completely ignore Trump's crazy budget proposal, the craziest such proposal in modern political history.

Trump released his crazy proposal last September. But so what? Within the new borders of our "journalism," his proposal barely exists.

It would almost be refreshing to see someone "downplay the contrast" with Clinton's proposals. That said, Krugman doesn't seem to have noticed the amazing way the American "press corps" has disappeared Donald J. Trump's lunatic budget plan.

Trump's lunatic plan has gone unreported. Speculating about what the press corps might do, Krugman declines to note this fact.

The New York Times has worked rather hard to disappear other matters. Amazingly, neither the Times nor the Post has offered a front-page report about the episode which launched Trump's current political career—the astounding, disgraceful birther campaign he launched in 2011.

There has been zero reporting on this disgraceful episode. Did Donald Trump really send investigators to Hawaii to probe the facts of Obama's birth? Were they really amazed by the things they discovered there?

Almost surely, Trump was lying about all parts of that extended story. But the New York Times has agreed to pretend that none of this conduct ever occurred. So has the rest of the stooge-filled guild we still describe as a press corps.

Eventually, we called security to the damp basement where the young analysts sleep at their carrels. This had the expected calming effect. But as they continued, the analysts mentioned the recent episode which has occasioned barely a peep from our liberal world.

We refer to the recent case of Trump's invented fact.

Alas! This recent episode took place at Krugman's own paper, not Over There at Fox News. For that reason, we liberals have barely managed a peep of protest about this peculiar conduct.

Within the span of a week, the Times recited a phony fact Trump has invented. Indeed, the Times recited it three separate times, in three high-profile locations!

It appeared in a news report right at the top of the paper's front page. It appeared in a Maureen Dowd column on the front page of the Sunday Review.

It even appeared in a cover story in the New York Times Sunday magazine. But so what? The liberal world, now including Krugman, yawned and looked away.

Kevin Drum cited one of the recitations, failing to note that it had appeared at the top of the Times front page. In comments to Drum's post, you'll see his readers wander off topic, just as Krugman does today midway through his column.

In a brief post at Slate, Daniel Politi mentioned Dowd's recitation of the fake fact, skipping the other two mentions. Have you seen anyone ask the obvious question:

How can a newspaper like the Times print a plainly bogus fact three different times in just one week, in three high-profile locations? How can such nonsense happen?

How on earth could the New York Times do that? Your liberal heroes will never ask. We love to rail about Fox News. When it comes to the Times, we sleep.

Krugman can't or won't mention this episode because he gets paid by the Times. Other players won't mention it because they want to get paid by the Times.

Donald J. Trump opposed the war in Iraq! As with his claims about the Hawaiian probe, Candidate Trump has rather plainly been lying about this. We saw him do so again last night.

Candidate Trump has been lying about Iraq. But if the New York Times hired a plane to write his claim across the sky, the Krugmans, Chaits and Marshalls would never complain. Or notice!

These people have been conning you in this way for years. Rachel Maddow also knows the art of this familiar con. So does Christopher Hayes and everyone else at their channel.

Will Trump's invented fact matter? Quite possibly, no—it will not.

"Al Gore invented the Internet" is an invented fact which took many lives. If we trust the current polls, "Donald Trump opposed the war in Iraq" may not make a difference.

That said, we liberals are asleep in the woods, as has long been our custom. At Slate, Jamelle Bouie has offered this formulation:
BOUIE (5/4/16): Romney wasn’t a bad candidate. He ran a competent and largely professional campaign against an incumbent who presided over high unemployment and slow growth. No, Romney wasn’t favored, but he also had a better shot than most candidates who run against a sitting president. If you believe that Trump can win—absent an exogenous shock like a terrorist attack or recession—you need to show how he beats Romney. You need to move this from the realm of speculation and into the world as it exists.
In Bouie's judgment, Candidate Trump can't win this year "absent an exogenous shock." That seems to mean that Trump could win in the event of a shock.

(Bouie imagines two types of shock, fails to imagine the possibility that a shock could emerge from the email matter.)

According to Bouie, Candidate Trump is behind. Also according to Bouie, an exogenous shock could make the election close. (We disagree with Bouie's apparent certainty that nothing else could do this.)

If the election gets close, Donald J. Trump's invented fact could tip the scales and let Trump win! But so what? Nothing will ever inspire our leaders to push back against the New York Times—to protest the horrible work by the silly people who work for that ludicrous newspaper.

Dearly beloved, it just isn't done! The Times could write it across the sky. Our heroes and stars wouldn't notice.

The pattern involving our leaders is clear. They'll feed us pabulum about Fox News; we will love them for this. When it comes to the crazy work of the Times, they will do what they've always done:

Our leaders will avert their gaze. Our fiery leaders will clam.

Meekly, we'll accept this. Rachel and Christopher are our heroes. Despite their massive corporate salaries and their possible love of success, we liberals are secure in our knowledge:

These major stars play on our side. They're part of our circle of cable news friends. They play it straight, close to the vest.

27 comments:

  1. Email? The FBI has found no evidence of malicious intent.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-prosecutors-in-virginia-assisting-in-clinton-email-probe/2016/05/05/f0277faa-12f0-11e6-81b4-581a5c4c42df_story.html

    OK, scant evidence. Whatever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad to know that there was no intent that enemies be able to get confidential info. If there had been intent, Hillary would be guilty of treachery. Without intent, she merely committed a few felonies.

      Delete
    2. Without intent, she committed no crime at all, David.

      But you go ahead and believe the fantasy that the people who do your thinking for you want you to believe.

      Delete
    3. "Glad to know that whatever the real facts are about virtually anything, you commit any notion you are anything but a witless troll to the dustbin."

      FTFY - NFO

      Delete
  2. Bouie's comparison between Romney's chances and Trump's implicitly (explicitly? I haven't yet checked the source) compares Obama and Clinton.

    Once again, one would want to check the data, but were Obama's negatives in 2008 as high as Clintons's are today? I rather doubt it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ""Al Gore invented the Internet" is an invented fact which took many lives."

    "took many lives" is an invented "fact" from Bob
    "took many turns in the wrong direction" Somerby.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Once again Bob Somerby complains of failure to discuss a non-existent budget proposal, proving he either does not know what a budget is, he makes mistakes due to careless laziness like his fellow pretend commentator Rachel Maddow, or deliberately invents/misrepresents facts to support his propaganda.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dave the Guitar PlayerMay 6, 2016 at 1:55 PM

      I think Bob might have meant Trump's "tax" proposal. Did that make Bob's point that difficult to follow? Or do you prefer to continue to believe that Bob deliberately makes these gaffes to mislead the American people.

      Delete
    2. "I think Bob might have meant ..." ZZZZZZzzzzz.

      Delete
    3. Tax receipts are an element of the budget. Trump hasn't released a complete detailed budget of course, but the term is accurate enough in this case for the sake of discussion.

      I've had some success raising doubt in tepid Trump supporters' minds by bring up his non-serious tax proposals. More persuasive I imagine than just declaring "you're a racist", especially when I have no real reason to believe the person is in fact a racist.

      Delete
    4. "Trump hasn't released a complete detailed budget of course...."

      Well @ 11:01 allow me to correct you.

      Less than 24 hours after you penned this lazy, dumb, liberal comment the Great Bobinski penned this great truth:

      "Trump released his formal budget proposal late last September."


      Delete
  5. Think whatever you like Dave. Bob has repeatedly called "tax" proposals "budget" proposals throughout this election cycle.

    You can ask if "I prefer to continue to believe" something. I quite clearly stated a set of alternatives that indicate I do not prefer a continuation of belief in anything you suggested, an indication of a possible reading problem on your part.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Goofus is willing to generalize wildly as he discusses those people."

    Bob Somerby, accusing Paul Krugman of stereotyping.

    "We liberals are cowards and ditto-heads, the emptiest type of camp followers."

    Bob Somerby, gallantly analyzing a group of people he has noted are lazy, of dubious morals, and disliked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you agreeing or disagreeing with Somerby?

      Delete
  7. Mr. Somersby - Sharing, on the slim chance you haven't seen it, this link - http://www.vox.com/2016/5/5/11589262/2016-general-election-is-going-to-suck .

    ReplyDelete
  8. Donald Trump's reaction and comments to the Central Park Five case were covered in the New Yorker and other places. As a story, it never gained traction. Bob, I don't believe has ever noted the case and Trump's reaction to it.
    It is possible a Trump supporter has never heard of this matter.
    It is possible a Trump supporter has heard of this matter, and is
    familiar with the facts surrounding it.

    The later Trump supporter is a racist asshole.
    If Bob Somerby is familiar with this matter, and downplays
    the "Trump as racist" meme, he is also a racist asshole.

    Now, the first person who I saw go on record as approving
    Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton is a News personality that
    we know Bob knows well.

    But, you wouldn't have heard about it here, because
    "O"Reilly gets a pass."

    Any questions?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When did O'Reilly become a liberal pundit? Why is being a racist a worse threat to our country than threatening to nuke the Middle East, defaulting on the national debt or being a sexist, for that matter? If you don't think being a sexist is worse thsn being a racist then you are a sexist asshole. How does that feel to you?

      Delete
    2. Here's a thought.

      Let's not pretend that Trump's racism has been discussed any more than his sexism or religious bigotry, or his nutty "ideas" if you can call them that about the national debt and national defense.

      And further, if your stated purpose is to discuss "the mainstream 'press corps' and the american discourse" don't give a pass to O'Reilly or anybody else because they are not "liberal pundits."

      Otherwise, drop the facade.

      Delete
  9. "Our own tribe's art of the con"

    The only con is BS pretending to be a liberal when he is really an old, angry, conservative, white southerner.


    "Rachel and Christopher are our heroes. Despite their massive corporate salaries"

    Bob exposes his massive jealousy and envy here. He can't handle that he never amounted to anything while Maddow is an award winning journalist.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Maddow#Honors_and_awards

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi, my girlfriend of a year had a bit broke up with me and went back to her EX-boyfriend. She said our relationship lacked the conversation piece because am a very quiet person and she don't feel loved by me. I felt heart broken and it affected me that i couldn't concentrate properly at my place of work for i very much loved her and need to get her back and my last chance was getting a love spell. I entered on the website http://doctorokpamenpowerfulspelltemple.webs.com and made contact with the Doctor for i read that he has a lot of positive feedback with his spells. I’m not disappointed because my lover came back to me within 24 hours after getting a love spell from the Doctor called Osemu Okpamen. We are happy couples now and if you need any kind of help, Email him on ( doctorokpamenspelltemple@hotmail.com or whats-app +2348135254384 ). Michael Snapp, +1 (305) 647-6660 USA.

    ReplyDelete
  11. My life became devastated when my husband sent me packing, after 8 years that we have been together. I was lost and helpless after trying so many ways to make my husband take me back. One day at work, i was absent minded not knowing that my boss was calling me, so he sat and asked me what its was all about i told him and he smiled and said that it was not a problem. I never understand what he meant by it wasn't a problem getting my husband back, he said he used a spell to get his wife back when she left him for another man and now they are together till date and at first i was shocked hearing such thing from my boss. He gave me an email address of the great spell caster who helped him get his wife back, i never believed this would work but i had no choice that to get in contact with the spell caster which i did, and he requested for my information and that of my husband to enable him cast the spell and i sent him the details, but after two days, my mom called me that my husband came pleading that he wants me back, i never believed it because it was just like a dream and i had to rush down to my mothers place and to my greatest surprise, my husband was kneeling before me pleading for forgiveness that he wants me and the kid back home, then i gave Happy a call regarding sudden change of my husband and he made it clear to me that my husband will love me till the end of the world, that he will never leave my sight. Now me and my husband is back together again and has started doing pleasant things he hasn't done before, he makes me happy and do what he is suppose to do as a man without nagging. Please if you need help of any kind, kindly contact Happy for help and you can reach him via email: happylovespell2@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hi, i would like to comment on Doctor Osemu Okpamen and his dealing with my need. I contacted him in desperation over my girlfriend of a year that broke up with me and went back to her EX-boyfriend. Consequently the break up has been devastating so much so that I've considered and still consider suicide as my only option to relieve the pain and agony in me. I felt heart broken and it affected me that i couldn't concentrate properly at my place of work for i very much loved her and need to get her back and my last chance was getting a love spell. I entered on the website http://doctorokpamenpowerfulspelltemple.webs.com and made contact with the Doctor for i read that he has a lot of positive feedback with his spells. I’m not disappointed because my lover came back to me within 24 hours after getting a love spell from the Doctor called Osemu Okpamen. We are happy couples now and if you need any kind of help, Email him on ( doctorokpamenspelltemple@hotmail.com or whats-app +2348135254384 ). Michael Snapp, +1 (305) 647-6660 USA.

    ReplyDelete

  13. I am Bob Odia i want to say a big thanks to Pa Oba who brought back my wife after she divorced me two years ago, i love this woman so much because she is the mother of my kids and i love her so much, but I never knew what came over her that made her thinks that i was cheating on her, so she asked for divorce, but i want to give a big appreciations to the great Pa Oba who brought her back to my life, and now myself and my wife and kids are living happily like never before, so i want you people to thank Pa Oba for helping me.
    If you are have any problem and you are confused and you do not know what to do, just try Pa Oba and contact him on obastarspell@gmail.com or visit http://obastarspell.webs.com for more info he can help you out of that your problems.

    ReplyDelete

  14. I am Bob Odia i want to say a big thanks to Pa Oba who brought back my wife after she divorced me two years ago, i love this woman so much because she is the mother of my kids and i love her so much, but I never knew what came over her that made her thinks that i was cheating on her, so she asked for divorce, but i want to give a big appreciations to the great Pa Oba who brought her back to my life, and now myself and my wife and kids are living happily like never before, so i want you people to thank Pa Oba for helping me.
    If you are have any problem and you are confused and you do not know what to do, just try Pa Oba and contact him on obastarspell@gmail.com or visit http://obastarspell.webs.com for more info he can help you out of that your problems.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hello, I am Sheryln Coleman I’m the most happiest person on the face of the earth, after 6 months of sadness and sorrow without being with the one i love, i tried all my possible best to make sure i make my lover happy but it never seems to work out well it was like am doing everything in vain but all thanks goes to Dr Osinbajor for coming to change all my worries and sadness to Joy. i knew the great man when i read some wonderful testimony about Dr Osinbajor how he has helped lots of people on their relationship problems i was reading a magazine when i saw great testimonies, as well my predicament then i decided not to waste time because i have missed my lover so much i decided to contact him and share all my problem with him which he told me not to worry that he is assuring me that within 48 hours everything would be sorted out i believed Dr Osinbajor‎ so much because of how he has been helping many people, my boyfriend who left me for good suddenly replied my text and returned my calls and asked me to please forgive him i was so happy am so grateful to Dr Osinbajor for what he has done for me and I promise to testify his goodness all through my life. If you are there passing the same problem or any kinds of problem contact this great man on his email address: osinbajorbabatunde@gmail.com‎
    1. Getting your lover or husband back
    2. Money spell/ good luck spell
    3. If you can’t satisfy your partner 
    4. Weight loss spell
    5. Get a job spell
    6. Promotion spells
    7. Getting your money back
    8. Freedom spells
    9. Love spell
    10. Avenging spell
    11. Lottery spell ‎

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hello, I am Sheryln Coleman I’m the most happiest person on the face of the earth, after 6 months of sadness and sorrow without being with the one i love, i tried all my possible best to make sure i make my lover happy but it never seems to work out well it was like am doing everything in vain but all thanks goes to Dr Osinbajor for coming to change all my worries and sadness to Joy. i knew the great man when i read some wonderful testimony about Dr Osinbajor how he has helped lots of people on their relationship problems i was reading a magazine when i saw great testimonies, as well my predicament then i decided not to waste time because i have missed my lover so much i decided to contact him and share all my problem with him which he told me not to worry that he is assuring me that within 48 hours everything would be sorted out i believed Dr Osinbajor‎ so much because of how he has been helping many people, my boyfriend who left me for good suddenly replied my text and returned my calls and asked me to please forgive him i was so happy am so grateful to Dr Osinbajor for what he has done for me and I promise to testify his goodness all through my life. If you are there passing the same problem or any kinds of problem contact this great man on his email address: osinbajorbabatunde@gmail.com‎
    1. Getting your lover or husband back
    2. Money spell/ good luck spell
    3. If you can’t satisfy your partner 
    4. Weight loss spell
    5. Get a job spell
    6. Promotion spells
    7. Getting your money back
    8. Freedom spells
    9. Love spell
    10. Avenging spell
    11. Lottery spell ‎

    ReplyDelete
  17. Strong Love spell to get your ex back fast.
    I’m extremely happy that my broken Marriage has been restored…
    "We recently made up, even though it was difficult. It's been more than a month now, and everything feels like it’s returned to normal. He has begun to treat me better, and it’s been a healing process for both of us. The nightmare that had lasted for almost 2 years before we broke up is finally over. It’s like we fell in love all over again! We’ve both put the past behind us, and are trying to move forward – and for the first time in a long time, the future looks a lot brighter.
    I can’t express in words how grateful I am Dr Unity! It’s like we’ve finally rediscovered those things about each other that made us fall in love in the first place. All of the worrying and stress has simply vanished. Thank you Dr Unity for saving my broken Marriage and brought my husband back to me!".
    Me and my husband are living together happily again.. All thanks to Dr Unity. If you have any problem contact Dr.Unity now and i guarantee you that he will help you.Email him at: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com ,you can also call him or add him on whats-app: +2348071622464.
    Sarah, 26 years, Texas, USA.

    ReplyDelete