THE GREAT I-AM: Did it start when he was two years old?

THURSDAY, APRIL 24, 2025

In search of The Great I-Am: Last Friday evening, sure enough! There he went again!

The person once dubbed "The Great I-Am" made his latest unfortunate statement. As far as we know, his literal statement was false. Once again, here's what he said:

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump

This is the hand of the man that the Democrats feel should be brought back to the United States, because he is such “a fine and innocent person.” They said he is not a member of MS-13, even though he’s got MS-13 tattooed onto his knuckles, and two Highly Respected Courts found that he was a member of MS-13, beat up his wife, etc. I was elected to take bad people out of the United States, among other things. I must be allowed to do my job. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

As far as we know, the highlighted statement is false. That said, it's being blared all over Red America. There he went again!

Should major organs in Blue America be addressing this latest misstatement? Tomorrow, we'll offer the pros and the cons regarding that undiscussed question. For today, we'll focus on this:

 He once was mocked as "The Great I-Am." Today, he's known as the sitting president.

It was his latest ridiculous claim—the latest in an endless succession of ludicrous but widely repeated misstatements. Is something "wrong" with this powerful person? 

Also, how in the world—how in earth—did he get to be this way?

How did he get to be like this? In Monday morning's report, we started pointing you at one insider's explanation. In the summer of 2020, she offered her assessment of that puzzle in a major best-selling book. 

Simon and Schuster, start packing your bags! The best-seller in question was this:

Too Much and Never Enough:
How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man
By Mary L. Trump

About The Book

In this revelatory, authoritative portrait of Donald J. Trump and the toxic family that made him, Mary L. Trump, a trained clinical psychologist and Donald’s only niece, shines a bright light on the dark history of their family in order to explain how her uncle became the man who now threatens the world’s health, economic security, and social fabric.

Mary Trump spent much of her childhood in her grandparents’ large, imposing house in the heart of Queens...

For the record, that's Mary L. Trump, Ph.D. She actually is "a trained clinical psychologist"—and she said she considers her famous uncle to be "the world's most dangerous man."

Setting that assessment to the side, how did her uncle get to be the way he currently is? How did he become a person who would emit endless streams of ludicrous claims, like the apparently bogus claim he launched on the world last Friday?

We don't want to bury the lede! Early in her massive best-seller, Mary Trump asserted that, in her view, President Trump's father, Fred Trump, was "a high-functioning sociopath." 

She noted the widely-accepted fact that the children of sociopaths will often have a hard way to go. Be that as it may, she also offered his assessment of her uncle, the president:

Prologue

[...]

None of the Trump siblings emerged unscathed from my grandfather’s sociopathy and my grandmother’s illnesses, both physical and psychological, but my uncle Donald and my father, Freddy, suffered more than the rest. In order to get a complete picture of Donald, his psychopathologies, and the meaning of his dysfunctional behavior, we need a thorough family history.

In the last three years, I’ve watched as countless pundits, armchair psychologists, and journalists have kept missing the mark, using phrases such as “malignant narcissism” and “narcissistic personality disorder” in an attempt to make sense of Donald’s often bizarre and self-defeating behavior. I have no problem calling Donald a narcissist—he meets all nine criteria as outlined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)—but the label gets us only so far.

[...]

Does Donald have other symptoms we aren’t aware of? Are there other disorders that might have as much or more explanatory power? Maybe. A case could be made that he also meets the criteria for antisocial personality disorder, which in its most severe form is generally considered sociopathy but can also refer to chronic criminality, arrogance, and disregard for the rights of others...

The fact is, Donald’s pathologies are so complex and his behaviors so often inexplicable that coming up with an accurate and comprehensive diagnosis would require a full battery of psychological and neuropsychological tests that he’ll never sit for.

So the niece assessed. 

The fact that Mary Trump stated those views doesn't mean that those views are accurate, true or correct. Also, assessments concerning "mental illness / mental disorder" are, on a conceptual basis, more complex than are assessments of most matters of "physical illness." 

That said, Mary Trump has the background of a trained specialist—and she has a second background as a member of the president's family. She was prepared to say that her uncle is the world's most dangerous man—but also that he seems to check the boxes for what we would call a "sociopath."

In her well-written, largely undiscussed book, she said that we should fear the adult—but she was also able to pity the child. Based upon family history which was apparentlty largely passed down by her aunt Maryanne (Donald Trump's older sister), she traces the story of the dangerous man back to his father's alleged sociopathy, but also to his mother's very serious medical issues, which began when the world's most dangerous man was just two years old.

Pity the child, she was able to say. At the start of Chapter One, she takes us back to the late 1940s. Her uncle is two years old as these events take place:

CHAPTER ONE: The House

“Daddy, Mom’s bleeding!”

They’d lived in the “House,” as my grandparents’ home was known, for less than a year, and it still felt unfamiliar, especially in the middle of the night, so when twelve-year-old Maryanne found her mother lying unconscious in one of the upstairs bathrooms—not the master bathroom but the bathroom she and her sister shared down the hall—she was already disoriented. There was blood all over the bathroom floor. Maryanne’s terror was so great that it overcame her usual reluctance to disturb her father in his bedroom, and she flew to the other end of the house to rouse him.

Fred got out of bed, walked quickly down the hall, and found his wife unresponsive. With Maryanne at his heels, he rushed back to his bedroom, where there was a telephone extension, and placed a call.

Already a powerful man with connections at Jamaica Hospital, Fred was immediately put into touch with someone who could get an ambulance to the House and make sure the best doctors were waiting for them when they arrived at the emergency room...

Shortly after Mary arrived at the hospital, she underwent an emergency hysterectomy after doctors found that serious postpartum complications had gone undiagnosed after Robert’s birth nine months earlier. The procedure led to an abdominal infection, and then further complications arose.

The niece's tale invites us to pity more than one child. "Maryanne spent the night crying alone in her room while her younger siblings remained asleep in their beds, unaware of the calamity," she writes. After that, also this:

She went to school the next day full of dread. Dr. James Dixon, the headmaster of Kew- Forest, a private school she had begun attending when her father joined the board of directors, came to get her from study hall. “There’s a phone call for you in my office.”

Maryanne was convinced that her mother was dead. The walk to the principal’s office was like a walk to the scaffold. All the twelve-year-old could think was that she was going to be the acting mother of four children.

There's more than one child to be pitied here. That said, the life of the president's mother had been saved. Here is the fuller account:

Mary would undergo two more surgeries over the next week, but she did indeed make it. Fred’s pull at the hospital, which ensured that his wife got the very best doctors and care, had probably saved her life. But it would be a long road back to recovery.

For the next six months, Mary was into and out of the hospital. The long-term implications for her health were serious. She eventually developed severe osteoporosis from the sudden loss of estrogen that went with having her ovaries removed along with her uterus, a common but often unnecessary medical procedure performed at the time. As a result, she was often in excruciating pain from spontaneous fractures to her ever-thinning bones.

According to Mary L. Trump, Mary Trump—the president's mother—never did fully recover. A bit later, she offers this account:

Mary never completely recovered. Restless to begin with, she became an insomniac. The older kids would find her wandering around the House at all hours like a soundless wraith. Once Freddy found her standing at the top of a ladder painting the hallway in the middle of the night. In the morning her children sometimes found her unconscious in unexpected places; more than once, she ended up having to go to the hospital. That behavior became part of the life of the House. Mary got help for the physical injuries she sustained but none for whatever underlying psychological problems made her put herself into high-risk situations.

We invite you to pity the children thrown into this circumstance. 

In the wake of this medical incident, an unfortunate state of affairs obtained inside The House. According to this nation's folk wisdom, "Motherless child sees a hard time when mother is gone." According to Mary L. Trump, this situation now obtained: 

During and after her surgeries, Mary’s absence—both literal and emotional—created a void in the lives of her children. As hard as it must have been for Maryanne, Freddy, and Elizabeth, they were old enough to understand what was happening and could, to some extent, take care of themselves. The impact was especially dire for Donald and Robert, who at two and a half years and nine months old, respectively, were the most vulnerable of her children, especially since there was no one else to fill the void. The live-in housekeeper was undoubtedly overwhelmed by the sheer volume of housework. Their paternal grandmother, who lived nearby, prepared meals, but she was as terse and physically unaffectionate as her son. When Maryanne wasn’t in school, much of the responsibility of taking care of the younger kids fell to her. (As a boy, Freddy wouldn’t have been expected to help.) She gave them baths and got them ready for bed, but at twelve there was only so much she could do. The five kids were essentially motherless.

"The five kids were essentially motherless." In the judgment of the clinical psychologist, the impact would have been especially dire for the fourth of the five Trump children, who was then only two years old.

So it started, Mary Trump writes, though it's also true that the child of a sociopath may be facing mental health danger under any circumstance. (Sociopathy can have "some or even a strong genetic basis." standard sources seem to say.)

In the family history she offers, Mary L. Trump goes on to describe the deeply unattractive way Fred Trump, the president's father, related to his children as the sole functioning parent. That complex story takes us up to the time when the current sitting president received an unflattering nickname and was even shipped off to "reform school."

In Monday's report, we showed you the passage in which Donald Trump, then maybe 11 or 12, came to be mocked as "The Great I-Am" by his brother, Freddy, who was eight years older. According to Mary L. Trump, the future president's behavior was already rather unattractive at this point in time. 

In Chapter Three of her best-selling book, she describes the state of play as adolescence drew on:

CHAPTER THREE: The Great I-Am

[...]

Encouraged by his father, Donald eventually started to believe his own hype. By the time he was twelve, the right side of his mouth was curled up in an almost perpetual sneer of self-conscious superiority, and Freddy had dubbed him “the Great I-Am,” echoing a passage from Exodus he’d learned in Sunday school in which God first reveals himself to Moses.

[...]

Though Donald’s behavior didn’t bother [his father]—given his long hours at the office, he wasn’t often around to witness much of what happened at home—it drove his mother to distraction. Mary couldn’t control him at all, and Donald disobeyed her at every turn. Any attempt at discipline by her was rebuffed. He talked back. He couldn’t ever admit he was wrong; he contradicted her even when she was right; and he refused to back down. He tormented his little brother and stole his toys. He refused to do his chores or anything else he was told to do. Perhaps worst of all to a fastidious woman like her, he was a slob who refused to pick up after himself no matter how much she threatened him. “Wait until your father comes home” had been an effective threat with Freddy, but to Donald it was a joke that his father seemed to be in on.

Finally, by 1959, Donald’s misbehavior—fighting, bullying, arguing with teachers—had gone too far. [The private] Kew-Forest [school] had reached its limits. Fred’s being on the school’s board of trustees cut two ways: on the one hand, Donald’s behavior had been overlooked longer than it otherwise might have; on the other, it caused Fred some inconvenience. Name-calling and teasing kids too young to fight back had escalated into physical altercations. Fred didn’t mind Donald’s acting out, but it had become intrusive and time consuming for him. When one of his fellow board members at Kew-Forest recommended sending Donald to New York Military Academy as a way to rein him in, Fred went along with it. Throwing him in with military instructors and upperclassmen who wouldn’t put up with his shit might toughen up Fred’s burgeoning protégé even more. Fred had more important things to do than deal with Donald.

I don’t know if Mary had any say in the final decision, but she didn’t fight for her son to stay home, either, a failure Donald couldn’t help but notice. It must have felt like a replay of all the times she’d abandoned him in the past.

Over Donald’s objections, he was enrolled at NYMA, a private boys’ boarding school sixty miles north of New York City. The other kids in the family referred to NYMA as a “reform school”—it wasn’t prestigious like St. Paul’s, which Freddy had attended. Nobody sent their sons to NYMA for a better education, and Donald understood it rightly as a punishment.

The essentially motherless child had been renditioned to what his siblings called "a reform school." According to Mary L. Trump, his behavior had exceeded the bounds of what was tolerable at the local private school he attended, even though his wealthy father sat on the school's board.

In that passage, Mary Trump describes the conduct of the 12-year-old child. A fairly obvious complaint could be made about this familiar, unflattering portrait:

He talked back. He couldn’t ever admit he was wrong; he contradicted [his mother] even when she was right; and he refused to back down. He tormented his little brother and stole his toys. 

A person could wonder if that unflattering portrait had perhaps been "reversed engineered"—had perhaps been composed, intentionally or otherwise, with the familiar behaviors of the sitting president in mind.

Was that passage "reverse engineered?" Everything is possible! That said, the young person in question was sent off to NYMA, which he attended through his high school graduation. 

(Years later, as reported by Slate, he made ludicrous claims about the athletic greatness he displayed while playing first base on that school's baseball team. Such conduct rarely stops.)

Last Friday, the person in question made his latest odd claim. It seems fairly clear that his claim was  false on the literal level, and that a second, more fanciful interpretation of what he had conceivably meant was also simply absurd.

There the president went again, making his latest ludicrous claim. When he did, braindead adepts repeated his claim on the Fox News Channel, and the permissive organs of Blue America agreed to just stare into air.

To her credit, Mary Trump is able to pity the child. She also said that we should fear the dangerous adult who emerged from her family's tortured history.

By the age of 12, he was being mocked as "The Great I-Am." Today, at the age of 78, major organs of Blue America afford him a much wider berth.

His latest claim was almost surely false. It's being bruited all over Red America, but then again, so what? Over here in Blue America, this latest familiar misconduct has been almost completely ignored.

Should the organs of Blue America find a way to confront this practice? Tomorrow, we'll examine that question—though by tomorrow, without any doubt, the beat will have gone on.

Many citizens believe what the president said. "Something we were withholding made us weak," Robert Frost once alleged.

Tomorrow: A few things we've perhaps been withholding


55 comments:

  1. In an astonishing escalation of the Trump family’s efforts to profit from crypto, a website promoting $TRUMP, the president’s so-called memecoin, announced on Wednesday that the coin’s largest buyers would be invited to meet him. The effort was, in effect, an offer of access to the White House in exchange for an investment in one of Mr. Trump’s crypto ventures.

    “Have Dinner with President Trump and the $TRUMP Community!” the invitation said. “Let the President know how many $TRUMP coins YOU own!”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I guess it's not corruption if president does it. In fact, this type of open corruption is another key way in which Trump is flaunting his powers. Playing with tariffs is another example of open corruption. ProPublica has a story about how the raw materials needed by a private Coca-Cola botting, whose owner is a major Trump contributor, were exempted from the tariffs.

      Delete
  2. Somerby sounds downright pissed he didn't get a thank you note from Trump.
    Sorry, Bob. If you didn't know Trump's loyalty is a one-way street, that's on you.
    Better luck next time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So, Somerby is a loyal Trumper who suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome. Do I get that one right?

      Delete
    2. DG, this is one long rationalization for Trump's bad behavior.

      Delete
    3. DG,
      Weird, huh?
      It's like how people who are against the rigged economy cheered along Trump's HUGE tax break for richest of the rich and corporations (and will do so again).
      Face it. We live in weird times.

      Delete
  3. Can we Democrats take a break from advocating for bringing violent illegal gangbanger human traffickers who beat their wives to our country to beat, rape, and kill your daughters, and focus for a moment on pitying the poor homosexual perverts who are trying to convince the Supreme Court that your Kindergarten children must be taught about leather clad drag queens and sodomy?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The butt-hurt from Right-wingers over drag queens protecting pre-teens from the sexual predations of the Republican Congressional caucus, speaks volumes about the modern Conservative movement.

      Delete
  4. Only children and the childless don't understand how normal male children and siblings work. Whatever alchemy of military school and family dynamics formed Donald Trump, he turned out to be one of the most courageous, effective, powerful, and interesting figures of our times.

    TDS and EDS reflect 50% each of envy and failure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Republican men have penis envy.

      Delete
  5. Today's Dems are not trying to solve real problems the way they did many years ago. In fact, they're working against Trump's efforts to solve problems. Years ago Dems worked with Reps to solve problems, just as Reps worked with Dems for civil rights laws. Today, Dems mostly just criticize and thwart Trump's attempt to solve problems. Here are some problems Trump is working to solve, without Dem help:
    -- Ukraine war.
    -- Gaza war.
    -- Illegal immigrants coming into the country.
    -- Illegal immigrants already in the country.
    -- Enormous deficit and national debt.
    -- Waste and fraud in government.
    -- Inequitable treatment of US in international financial affairs.
    -- Loss of manufacturing in US

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes Dems should work with Trump to help Putin reclaim the Eastern Bloc for Mother Russia you fascist pig. Every time you bullet point you point out how ignorant you are about how things are. Sad fascist. Sad.

      Delete
    2. Good example. Trump's solution is the wrong way to do it. But, where's the Dem plan to solve the war in Ukraine?

      Delete

    3. Yes, we idiot-Democrats are the best judges and enforcers of Eastern European affairs. Because we already ruined America, we now need some other place where men can be turned into women and sodomites unleashed to freely roam the streets.

      Delete
    4. Let him who said “I alone can fix it” , fix it.

      Delete
    5. Dems didn’t say they could fix the problem so they have no obligation to fix the problem.

      Delete
    6. The Dem plan is to send more poor saps to slaughter before the inevitable Putin victory, which is going to happen.

      Delete
    7. Trump's peace plan, as I understand it:
      - Ukraine cedes all captured territory.
      - Cannot join NATO.
      - There are some non-specific security guarantees.
      - Sanctions are lifted on Russia, allowing it to prop up its staggering economy.

      Since de-nazification of Ukraine is not complete -- and Ukraine is not really a country, according to Putin -- Russia conducts another "special military operation".

      In the meantime, Trump gets rich from extracting minerals from Ukraine.

      Delete
    8. Trump doesn’t want any help. If you don’t agree with his “plan,” he doesn’t want to hear from you. He is bypassing congress with his tariffs. He killed a bipartisan border bill back in 2024. The current GOP budget, like during his first term, adds to the debt/deficit. Democrats represent a lot of people who don’t want massive cuts to Medicaid or education, for example. Trump doesn’t care and will not compromise. He and the gop want massive tax cuts for the wealthy, again. It isn’t that Democrats “don’t want to fix” things; they have different ways of trying to fix them. Biden and Harris both campaigned on a message of bipartisanship. Trump wants to exclude Democrats.

      Delete
    9. “ The Dem plan is to send more poor saps to slaughter before the inevitable Putin victory, which is going to happen.”

      So Trump has no influence with Putin? Or does he agree with Putin’s aims? Because Trump could use his position to pressure Russia and to offer Ukraine something other than outright capitulation. The Ukrainians are fighting for their country.

      Delete

    10. Ukraine was a country, back when it was neutral, and friendly with its neighbors. And then it was destroyed, by the Nazi neocon-Democrats; Victoria Nuland did most of the work, apparently.

      It happened in February 2014. Whether the Russian Federation will manage to recover (de-nazify) it, remains to be seen. If not, it'll probably be split between the RF, Romania, Hungary, and Poland.

      Delete
    11. Thanks for the kremlin line,1:26. Apparently, ukraine doesn’t get to align itself with whom it chooses, especially if that happens to be Europe or the West. Describing the massive protests that led to the Maidan Revolution in February 2014 in the way you do is mere absurd propaganda.

      Delete
    12. The Ukraines are not fighting for their country they are fighting because Zelensky is forcing them to fight. Trump has little influence on Russia other than slight mitigation of any post war consequences. He sees the writing on the wall and wants the killing to stop, and knows it isn't going to stop on Zelensky's terms which benefit Zelensky at the cost of meat shields he is continuing to force to die.

      Delete
    13. The Ukraines are not fighting for their country they are fighting because Zelensky is forcing them to fight.
      This statement win the most tone deaf, irony unaware pronouncement of the week.

      Delete
    14. Ukraine is still going strong, being supported by the US and most other countries in the world.

      The fix for Ukraine is for Putin to stop attacking Ukraine. Aside from not wanting Ukraine to join the EU, Putin has imperial ambitions; Putin is a fascist that wants to rule the world. Not going to happen, though, too fucking bad for Putin, boohoo.

      Most of the "fighting" involves Ukrainian drones killing Russian soldiers and destroying their equipment and bombing strategic military targets in Russia, with Russia responding by bombing civilian locations like schools and hospitals.

      Putin/Russia has been exposed as a paper tiger.

      NATO has been strengthened.

      Russia is collapsing.

      Biden's plan was/is working, Trump has no plan.

      Delete
    15. The Dem plan to pay our military contractors to build munitions for the Ukrainians to use to blow up Russian shit was working fairly well, Dickhead.

      Delete
    16. Ilya - I doubt that anyone will get rich from Ukrainian minerals. But if anyone does, it’s the US that will get rich. That is, you and will share in the riches.

      Delete
    17. You're welcome 1:56 PM. If this is the kremlin line, good for the kremlin, because it's all true.

      Alas, because of the Nazi-neocons Ukraine didn't get to align with whom it chooses. It was split exactly 50/50 between pro-EU (West & Center) and pro-Russia (South & East) sentiment, which is why the country broke up after the Nazi-neocon coup in Kiev in 2014. A civil war started. In 2022, the RF recognized the pro-Russian republics in the East, and entered the conflict on their side.

      And so it goes.

      Delete
    18. @2:50 - I don’t think that prior policy was working well at all . Russia was gradually gobbling up Ukraine. Thousands of people were being killed each week. The US was spending billions of dollars, although we don’t have the money to do so. We were borrowing money to pay for the war.

      Can you explain how that was working fairly well?

      Delete
    19. David, Putin ordered the invasion of Ukraine. He has ignored every call for a ceasefire. Even if Ukraine accepts every aspect of Trump's so-called peace plan, what evidence leads you to think Putin will abide by it?

      Just "trust him"?

      Delete
    20. I agree with you, Quaker. Putin is entirely untrustworthy. Somehow the peace agreement must contain something to prevent a new incursion by Russia. I'm afraid that may not happen.

      I am not convinced that Trump's idea that the minerals deal would be sufficient to deter Putin. The idea of having some unarmed European troops stationed in Ukraine seems totally inadequate.

      Delete
    21. The U.S. holds a weak hand to counter Russian aggression against Ukraine. Trump campaigned on the idea that Putin respects (or alternately, fears) Trump and Trump alone would be able to rein Putin in,

      So what can the U.S, do? First, there are a few actions that we can safely say are off-limits. Sending American troops to counter the Russians isn't going to happen, A shooting conflict with a nuclear-armed adversary would constitute a dangerous escalation Similarly, pushing for Ukraine to become a NATO member would be a serious provocation.

      The U.S. can forcefully denounce Russia's invasion. We can organize our allies to engage in pushback with sanctions and boycotts. We can exclude Russia from international financial and trade agreements. And we can demand concessions before we relent on any of the above. Lastly, we can make sure Ukraine has the resources they need to resist a total Russian takeover.

      Is there anything else that can be done? Does this outline sound familiar? It should. It's been U.S. policy for the past three years.

      All Trump has added is a cessation of material support and a demand that Ukraine surrender the territory Russia has seized--but without any assurance that will be the end of Russia's ambitions.

      Delete
    22. And then we go back to dic’s argument, which is that zelensky and the Dems apparently don’t want peace, aping Trump’s line, so why won’t zelensky just capitulate? It’s insanity.

      Delete
    23. This is what you get when you make the world's biggest bullshit artist president. When trump said he could shoot someone in the face in the middle of the day on 5th Avenue and wouldn't lose his support, trump was thinking of Dickhead in Cal.

      Delete
    24. The reality is that Russia is stuck in a quagmire that is bleeding its human and material resources. Did Russia help us out in Vietnam? No, because if your enemy is self-destructing, you stand by and watch. So why should we help Russia out in Ukraine?

      Delete
    25. David complains that prior U.S. policy wasn't working. That's how the world is sometimes. If you remain true to your principles and do all that you can, you don't get the result you want right away--or ever, sometimes.

      Trump, Vance, and Rubio have hinted that the time is coming for the U.S. to simply give up and walk away.

      Delete
    26. The war in Ukraine was a terrible debacle that the United States walked into by expanding NATO, despite Russia’s continued objections. All the United States has to do is guarantee them that NATO will not be expanded to their border and the whole thing is over. But we can’t do that because we are the bullies of the world and the people running our government have gone long ago mad.

      Delete
    27. It can be said with 100% certainty that if Trump backed Ukraine and labeled Putin the illegitimate aggressor, the MAGAs, including DiC would uniformly back the invaded country, rather than capitulate to the invaders.

      Delete
    28. And the Loaded Comment of the Night goes to 6;53!!!

      Delete
    29. Trump has been seen collaborating with Travis Tritt.

      Delete
    30. One would think Ukraine taking on our enemy, the World's 2'nd Military, with a leader promising to restore the Soviet Empire, that eliminating 10,000 tanks, 25,000 artillery systems, 6,000 officers, 950,000 soldiers and reducing it to launching attacks on dirt bikes and electric scooters with supplies moved by mules is working fairly well for us at least. And it is all about us right DiC?

      Delete

    31. Only war-mongering Nazi-Democrats see the Russian Federation as their enemy. And no Russian President was ever "promising to restore the Soviet Empire".


      Delete
    32. "Did Russia help us out in Vietnam? No, because " blah, blah.

      Jeez, you idiot-Democrats are ignorant. During the Vietnam war, Russia was one of the 15 republic comprising the Soviet Union. It didn't conduct its own foreign policy.

      The Soviet supreme leader of most of that time, General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Leonid Brezhnev, in his youth self-identified as ethnic Ukrainian.

      Delete
    33. "Yes, we idiot-Democrats are the best judges and enforcers of Eastern European affairs. Because we already ruined America, we now need some other place where men can be turned into women and sodomites unleashed to freely roam the streets."

      Cope, Soros-bot.

      Delete
    34. Trump could literally give black people reparations for slavery in private, and he'd still lose the support of every single Republican voter.

      Delete
    35. Only all war-mongering Nazi-Republican Presidents after WWII and before the fascist felon saw the Russian Federation as their enemy.

      Delete
    36. Here is the thing DIC. I don't know if you know the R's have the Congress, Courts, and Presidency (those would be the three branches, dummy). So instead of asking what the Dem plan is to end the war, please explain what the R plan is? And Trump saying give everything to Putin and me is not an acceptable answer, you Nazi swine.

      Delete
  6. It is Phone It In Thursday, offered with a dollop of copy/pasting, from a really poor thinker that fails to understand that corporate media will never play a significant role in solving unresolved childhood trauma.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I just finished reading Anthony Beevor's book, a history of the Spanish civil war. This was a war between fascists led by Franco, supported by monarchists and the Church, Hitler and Mussolini against the elected liberal government, supported by communists, socialists, anarchists, and Stalin. This was a brutal war which Franco won. If you think things are bad here between the reds and the blues - Spain was worse, a real civil war with thousands getting killed. This book is more relevant than the Iliad or Camus when it comes to understanding what is going on here now.
    In the last chapter of the book, in the second to last page, Beevor writes: "facts gathered so painstakingly by Spanish hisotirans over recent years leave little further doucbt about [the war's] scale or its cruelty. The only question left to answer covers the thought processes of those who perpetrated such a regime. But to speculate about the mental state of such oppressors, whether Nazi, Soviet or nationalist, si to risk assuming the dubious mantle of a long-distance psychiatrist."
    TDH has been donning this mantle somewhat obsessively for some time. It seems an exercise in futility.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mary Trump, with her PhD, does not speculate about Trump's psychological state (as Somerby implies) but states explicitly that his pathology is complex and must emerge from a battery of tests. She does not call him a sociopath and doubts that malignant narcissist fully describes him. Somerby plow right ahead and pretends that Trump endorsed his own suggestion that Trump is sociopathic.

    Somerby seems to believe that difficult childhood circumstances necessarily produce indviduals like Donald Trump. They don't. Bad childhoods and rotten parenting are not determinative of personality types (which many personality theorists consider genetic) because different children respond differently to their parents and their childhood circumstances. They cope differently. They explai their lives differently. They form different identities and develop different skills because they have different attributes. Boys and girls respond differently from each other. Concluding, as Somerby frequently does, that losing a parent or having an abusive parent must necessarily result in a child growing up to be JD Vance or Tucker Carlson, is not justified by the evidence of people's lives.

    Another major problem with Somerby's approach is that it depends on him looking backward into Trump's life and cherry-picking events that explain his current behavior. That is the logical fallacy of confirming the consequent and it is what got the Repressed Memory fanatics into trouble when they concluded that if someone is a mess today, then they must have been sexually abused as a child, because they have current symptoms like those of some (but not all) abused people. But someone can be a mess for entirely different reasons and they can emerge unscathed from horrific conditions too. So, Somerby's reasoning about this is wrong, unjustified if only by the fact that he has other siblings who turned out more of less normal and a lot better than Trump did (when Trump was his father's favorite and heir apparent).

    Why does Somerby keep tooting this horn? I think he is working overtime to present Donald Trump in a better light. If he were less biased, he might be talking about Trump's obvious signs of dementia and hounding blue media to call for Trump's retirement, the way he did for Biden on a lot less evidence.

    And ultimately, at the end of his essay, Somerby's point is that blue media isn't talking about Trump's childhood enough, even though Mary Trump got a lot of exposure when her book came out (which is how it became a bestseller, duh!).

    Trump is the worst leader since Hitler but Somerby still thinks the problem is the blue media. That makes no sense at all, which puts Somerby squarely in the red tribe. You may disagree with blue voters but we generally make sense. Somerby does not, and that is a key diagnostic criterion for whether or not someone is pushing red lies.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Programs for alcoholics and drug addicts, people who frequently have very difficult childhood circumstances, do not permit them to pity themselves or use their pasts as an excuse for their poor coping skills. Neither would any therapist working with Donald Trump. Pity has no place in psychotherapy or any kind of behavior change. And when Somerby pities Trump without pitying his victims, he enables both the wrongs Trump commits, and the neglect of efforts to prevent such harm, provide restitution to those wronged, and put someone better in charge of our country. Excusing Trump allows the abuse of our nation's citizenry to continue and that is a huge wrong that must be corrected. It may be that only we, the citizens and voting public can do something about Trump. If that means treating Trump harshly, we need to do it and not waste emotional energy pitying an asshole like Trump (and assholes like Somerby who identity with him).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Biden was spotted hand gliding with Mookie Blaylock. Newsweek said they are running a meme coin scam.

      Delete
    2. Meanwhile President Poopy Pants, can't waddle five steps, without stopping for an Adderall pick me up.

      Delete
    3. Lynyrd Skynyrd said it best, ooh-ooh that smell, can't you smell that smell?

      Delete