MONDAY, JULY 27, 2026
We Blues almost surely will: In fairness, his first remark, taken in context, was a bit self-deprecating. You could possibly call it good-natured.
The comment was actually funny. To our ear, it got an honest laugh.
The fellow had just been introduced by Weijia Jiang, the head of the White House Correspondents Association, at last Friday night's restaging of the association's annual dinner.
As part of her introduction, she made a reference to the cancellation of the first attempt. Below, you see what the sitting president said:
JIANG (7/24/26): ...President Trump, I've covered you for a long time and so have many reporters in this room.
When we ask questions, you push back. You give us answers, and we push back. You have always been a "deal" guy. Well, that's the deal—and the First Amendment is a done deal.
And that's what we toast tonight—the freedoms that brought us back together, even after they were threatened. So let's raise a glass to what makes ours a beautiful country.
[Jiang leads the toast]
And now, ladies and gentlemen, please join me in welcoming the 45th and 47th president of the United States, President Donald J. Trump.
PRESIDENT TRUMP: Wow! That was very beautiful, but this has not been an easy evening—all these awards.
AUDIENCE: [Laughter]
PRESIDENT TRUMP: [Grimaces, shakes his head]
As you can hear on the videotape, he got a very good laugh. We've been in many rooms where joking comments were offered. To our ear, the laughter he got was both authentic and earned.
In the earlier part of the evening, he'd sat in his seat at the head table as awards were given to various journalists who had challenged his endlessly disordered behavior. The awards were deserved, but the comment was rueful—and his rueful comments was rewarded with laughter, as you can hear on the tape.
His first comment received a good laugh. His presentation went downhill from there, screaming as it did.
(For Roll Call's transcript, click here.)
He started with endless, tedious recollections built from his astonishing degree of self-involvement. From there, he proceeded to long strings of inane, inappropriate insults, driven along by his standard array of absurd, long-corrected misstatements.
Governor Pritzker was "a fat pig." Governor Newsom's name was "Newscum." Jake Tapper was really "Fake Tapper."
Senator Schiff was said to have a "big fat ugly head." ("I call him watermelon head, because he has the largest head I've ever seen with the smallest neck.")
Rosie O'Donnell is "a sick older woman, I guess now I have to say."
We're omitting reams of other insults, not wishing to drive certain images and certain bogus claims forward. Pathetically, though, he even went with this embarrassing mess at one point:
PRESIDENT TRUMP: And I know Dumocrats—and the word "Dumocrat" is something that's come into fashion. I changed the E with a U. And most people don't know that "dumb" has a B. So, we don't have to worry about that.
It's very quiet [in the hall]. I thought it was quite good, but I haven't gotten much credit for that.
We'll offer a guess—most people do know that "dumb" is spelled with a B. This seems to have been a recent revelation to the sitting president, though perhaps to no one else.
The insults and the self-involved tedium went on and on and on. At roughly the 50-minute mark, C-Span's cameras began to pan to frozen faces in the audience, as you can see on the official tape.
As you can see on the tape, it panned to frozen faces in a silent hall at 10:22 p.m., then again at 10:23.
Out in that audience, there seemed to be nothing except frozen faces, many looking down. At 10:28, as the droning continued, C-Span even panned, for the first time, to frozen faces at the head table.
At 10:29, it showed another frozen face at the head table, along with a second person who was now sitting with his back turned to the president.
He had now been droning for 56 minutes. At the one-hour mark, he finally said it:
"It was a rigged election."
Roughly five minutes later, he closed with an unhappily accurate statement:
"Our country's doing things that no one's ever seen before."
The accuracy was unintentional as the gentleman finally stopped. With that, we pose this morning's question:
At this point, can any serious person really doubt it? Can anyone doubt that something is severely wrong with the president?
He had seemed to be sleeping about half the time as he sat through the earlier speeches and the aforementioned awards. Later, he seemed to have trouble opening his eyes even when he himself was speaking.
Can anyone doubt or deny that something seems to be wrong? The answer we'll give you today is this:
We Blues are going to do just that! We Blues aren't going to speak!
David French and David Brooks aren't going to say it. Nicholas Kristof isn't going to say it. Neither is Michelle Goldberg or Peter Baker or anyone else from the New York Times news division.
Rachel Maddow isn't going to speak, and neither is Nicolle Wallace. Joe and Mika aren't going to say it. Neither is Lawrence O'Donnell.
No one at The Atlantic is going to speak. Jeffrey Greenberg isn't going to give anyone that assignment.
Anderson Cooper isn't going to speak, and neither is Jake Tapper. We're sorry to say that the same is almost surely true of Kaitlan Collins, whose character we've admired since the first Covid year, when she alone was willing to challenge the endless blather being performed at the president's televised bullroar and blather events.
Is something wrong with President Trump? At this point, what sane person could really deny it? Consider:
As you probably know, the president tried to insult Collins at Friday night's event. The insult he tried to aim at her got more attention than any of the million additional insults which froze the faces of an entire ballroom that night.
He tried to insult her, but neither she nor CNN was bowing to his pathetic attempt. And so, inevitably, what did he do?
Of course! Turning to Truth Social, he went ahead and did it again! Over at Mediaite, here's the start of Joe DePaolo's report:
Trump Doubles Down on His Attack Against CNN’s Kaitlan Collins By Posting a Shocking New Meme
President Donald Trump doubled down on his attack against CNN’s Kaitlan Collins by posting a shocking new meme to his Truth Social account.
In a Sunday morning Truth post, the president shared a doctored photo depicting Collins in place of trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney in a 2023 Bud Light promotional campaign.
Trump’s new meme comes on the heels of his attack on the CNN anchor Friday night at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in which he compared Collins to Mulvaney.
Joe DePaolo's report for Mediaite continues along from there. To see the president's Truth Social post, you can just click here.
Just to be clear:
The president's Truth Social post says nothing "shocking" about Collins. With great valor, she led the way in the first Covid year.
We've been grateful ever since. The president's post says nothing "shocking" about her.
To the extent that the post is "shocking," it's shocking because of what it makes clear about the president himself. Simply put, it's no longer possible for reasonable observers to doubt the fact that something seems to be badly "wrong" with the sitting American president.
Now for the rest of the story:
No one could doubt or deny the fact that something seems to be wrong. No sane person could doubt or deny it, but We Blues almost certainly will!
Other parts of his recent conduct make this problem even more obvious. That said, We Blues are going to look away from this dangerous state of affairs.
In fairness, this is all part of the human condition. It's part of the imperfect wiring of our imperfect human species.
The Fox New News Channel is a giant slag heap, but We Blues are a piece of work too. Faces were frozen all through the hall.
We Blues aren't going to say that.
Tomorrow: "Other parts of his recent conduct make this problem even more obvious."
"an anyone doubt or deny that something seems to be wrong? The answer we'll give you today is this:
ReplyDeleteWe Blues are going to do just that! We Blues aren't going to speak!"
We have been denying the supposed silence since Somerby first proposed it. If Somerby chooses not to hear what the left has been saying about Trump, that is on him, not us Blues.
Why does Somerby keep repeating his own big lie? I believe it is so he can bash Blues on a daily basis and imply that it is our fault this person is still president, when the power to remove him rests with the Republicans.
Further, we Blues are not denying that there is something majorly wrong with Trump, when we call for Trump to be held accountable for his behavior. Whatever is wrong with Trump does not excuse what he has been doing as he breaks the law, ignores the Constitution, and volates norms of human decency.
"The Fox New News Channel is a giant slag heap, but We Blues are a piece of work too. Faces were frozen all through the hall."
This is Somerby's evidence that we Blues are responsible for Trump? No. It is evidence that the attendees at the dinner respect the press enough not to make a spectacle at the award ceremony honoring so many journalists. Nothing would be gained by such a public display. The press DID savage Trump's performance afterwards. Somerby knows that. And whoever the person was who turned his back to Trump, plus all those frozen faces, also tell the story of how we Blues and the rest of the media, and the good decent reds at that ceremony all felt about Trump's performance.
But Somerby is apparently not satisfied unless there is bomb throwing (or whatever display he implies should have happened). He doesn't say what he thinks the proper protest should have been, nor does he ever tell his readers what he thinks should be happening.
We Blues are talking about how to democratically defeat the right in the midterms and in 2028. That is what we think we should be doing. We are working overtime to do it. What is Somerby doing? To my knowledge, he has never urged his readers to vote Blue in their primaries. Why not? I think it is because he only wants to criticize Blues, not see Trump's misbehavior addressed and his power curbed. Somerby is working for the right, attacking the left, thereby advancing right wing objectives. That is why he manufactures a non-issue (blues don't speak, he says) when anyone here to list citations for Blues discussing what is wrong with Trump, any day of the week (going back to 2015 and before).
Well said.
DeleteSomerby phones it in again today. Kaitlyn Collins is not news, not important to anything happening in our country. The President made a sexist insult targeting her. She is a big girl and she can take it.
ReplyDeleteYup.
DeleteTiedrich is a Blue substack author. He spend every day of the week telling his readers that Trump is nuts. Here is today's offering:
ReplyDelete"Dear Leader is bugfuck nuts.
we know this. it’s not open to debate. we’ve all seen the erratic behavior. the pants-shittingly infantile tantrums. the utter lack of impulse control. the mood swings. the ever-shifting incoherence he wreaks on the world, as the family of raccoons that live inside his fat, waterlogged head randomly chew through all the wires."
How is this the silence Somerby claims exist over here in Blue territory? Obviously, it isn't. Here are some of the others commenting daily on Trump's insanity: Thom Hartmann, Heather Cox Richardson, Robert Reich, Simon Rosenberg, Aaron Rupar, the crew at Wonkette, Steve M., Digby (Heather Parton), Joyce Vance, American Prospect, David Pakman, Meidas Touch, Al Franken's podcast, Rachel Maddow's podcast, and a host of people commenting on specific issues including education, immigration, civil rights, health, environment.
Somerby doesn't seem to read any of these people. Perhaps he has lost the ability to read anything? Perhaps he is one of those old farts who sits in a recliner all day watching Fox 24/7, excerpt for a brief break when the Meals on Wheels people come to visit. That seems to be the only thing he can write about, while assuming that if he doesn't read it, it doesn't exist, when it comes to Blue media.
What is wrong with having a "frozen face" while someone is hurling stupid-ass insults that are obviously untrue at working journalists? Working journalists maintain similar frozen faces whenever a politician tells them a baldface lie in response to a legitimate question during an interview or at a presser. It is called "being professional". It doesn't mean they don't care about being lied to, about what is happening to our country. It means they are not supposed to react while collecting info for their reports, and certainly not while the president is lying to the American people on camera.
ReplyDeleteIt seems to me that Somerby has never understood how journalism works, the ethics and practices important to the work of reporting news. His criticism here today is silly and wrong. Somerby embarrasses himself with this nonsense, but he also reveals why he himself was never able to make a career in journalism, back when he quit teaching and was trying to find something else to support himself.
The question is, why in the name of all that’s holy, would the WHCA invite the nasty bastard to speak?
ReplyDeleteIt is a tradition. "Every president has attended at least one WHCA dinner, beginning with Calvin Coolidge in 1924." First Trump broke that tradition by refusing to speak at it during his first term. Now he thinks he is "owning" it by saying mean crud incoherently.
DeleteNote that the WHCA had great difficulty finding a comedian to roast Trump, so they substituted a magician act instead, to spare Trump's feelings. Somerby doesn't mention all those standup comedians with their frozen faces unwilling to speak truth to Trump -- these are Somerby's peers! Does he call them cowards? Crickets on that.
The event is supposed to show that the President and the press can be cordial and respectful to each other despite their sometimes adversarial roles in our democracy. Trump doesn't understand that, so he went for his version of blood in his own talk. Then Somerby faults the press attendees for being polite, in keeping with the purpose of the dinner.
DeleteThey didn’t have difficulty, those CHOSE not to have a comedian
DeleteA real comedian would have shown up Trump.
DeleteTiedrich to the rescue! If Rachel and Anderson won't say it, Tiedrich will:
ReplyDelete"isn’t that charming? Donny and the diaper nurse [Natalie Harp] are doubling down on the childish ‘Kaitlan Collins and Dylan Mulvaney, who can even tell them apart’ crack that Donny made at the Correspondents’ Dinner. why? it wasn’t a particularly clever — or even remotely accurate — remark. it’s just a sad reminder that we’re dealing with the most infantile administration ever. it’s just sewer clowns and bridge trolls."
Is that blunt enough for Somerby? In response to the meme posted last night entitled "The Man who Saved America," showing Trump at different ages, Tiedrich says:
"which man, exactly, ‘saved America’? the psychotic teenager who was so out of control that his cold and distant parents shipped him off to a military academy, so he’d be out of their hair? the serial predator who used to fight with his dead pedo bestie over which one of them had the right to ‘own’ the Motel-a-Lago ‘spa girls’? the racist game show host? or the current doughy pantload in the Oval Bordello?"
Is that enough truth for Somerby? Then Tiedrich discusses the lies being told about the Iran war by Waltz, Hegseth and Trump, something Somerby has never done. Somerby has just turned his own frozen face to the wall whenever Iran is mentioned. You would think it doesn't exist based on what Somerby writes about ever...you'll never hear about it from Somerby.
Spot on.
DeleteIt is Somerby's frozen face that is notable.
"WE BLUES: Can anyone deny the fact that something is wrong?"
ReplyDeleteSomerby's headline today is a bit ambiguous. Are we supposed to deny that something is wrong with "we blues" or with Trump? Both or neither?
I deny that there is something wrong with We Blues. It is not our job to keep Trump in line -- the reds have been doing a bad job at that, but it is their responsibility, given that they control both houses of Congress. Somerby should be asking whether anyone can deny there is something very wrong with Republicans, red America.
We Blues have the strong poll numbers that suggest we will be retaking the House after the midterms. That means something is right with we blues. We have new candidates who are exciting voters. We have an invigorated resistance and victories in most of the special elections held so far. Why would Somerby claim there is anything wrong in blue America, unless he were shilling for the reds?
Exactly.
DeleteThere is something seriously wrong with Somerby. Can anyone deny that?
ReplyDeleteThere is trouble in red paradise because the incumbents jilted by Trump are now making trouble for Trump's programs and appointees:
ReplyDelete"Now freed of any threats of being primaried by a Trump-endorsed opponent, Cornyn has already used his “newfound political freedom” to extract concessions, having threatened ambassador nominees last week to secure a commitment for international AIDS relief funding. He also issued a vague threat that he was only getting started in wielding his newfound power under threat of tanking the White House’s plans.
“You ain’t seen nothing yet,” Cornyn said, per Punchbowl News.
Cornyn joined what The Washington Post called a growing number of GOP “apostates,” Republican lawmakers perfectly poised to undercut the White House’s agenda after having been ousted by Trump-backed opponents.
“They now have nothing to lose if they stand up against him,” the Post’s Karen Tumulty previously wrote of the growing list of ousted GOP lawmakers burned by Trump, which includes Cornyn, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Sens. Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Bill Cassidy (R-LA)."
This is no more than what Republican congress members should have been doing from the beginning, but better than never exerting control on the President.
Today Somerby suggests Trump is charming but also insulting and tedious.
ReplyDeleteTrump is the least popular president in history, primarily due to the "blues".
That suggests that Somerby is also insulting and tedious; but perhaps he is jealous of Trump, lacking his supposed "charm".