THREE-CARD MONTE, TRIBAL SCRIPT: Tribal leaders, tell us a story!


Part 4—Sources of tribal belief:
Increasingly, it's becoming clear. Like the very bad people known as The Others, we liberals love our tribal stories.

Melinda Anderson told a good one at The Atlantic this week. As you may recall, the story started like this:
ANDERSON (12/7/15): Tunette Powell travels across the country counseling families and mentoring youth. An award-winning motivational speaker and author, her professional work in the education field ranges from training nonprofit leaders to consulting for colleges and universities. But none of Powell’s career-related skills could prepare her for the frustration and helplessness of seeing her two sons suspended from preschool, which she pegged to overly harsh and racially biased discipline. In a July 2014 Washington Post opinion piece that gained national attention, Powell relates how her boys—ages 3 and 4—were suspended from their Omaha preschool program eight times total in one year. Once published, the essay resonated with readers nationwide. “So many parents reached out [to me]...a lot of black mothers” who shared her experience with excessive suspensions, said Powell. “We live in a time when we just say, ‘Suspend them, get rid of them.’”

A glance at news headlines confirms that Powell and her sons are not an anomaly...
Increasingly, we liberals seem to love stories of that type, even when such stories are false. For yesterday's report, click here.

Alas! Contrary to what we were told, Powell's experience with her sons' preschool seems to have been a giant anomaly. We base that judgment on a statistic Anderson mentioned early in her report, and on a few other statistics she apparently chose to withhold.

Alas! According to Anderson's cited sources, only one preschooler in every 400 gets suspended more than once in the course of a single school year. If Powell's sons got suspended four times each in that single school year, her experience had moved past the realm of the merely anomalous. She had entered the rarified statistical air of near impossibility.

Alas! We liberals simply adore stories of this type. We seem to love these stories so much that we're willing to overlook the "false notes" which would suggest, to honest brokers, that the stories we're inclined to love are quite possibly wrong.

In the case of Anderson's story, the first "false note" was throbbing and flashing right there in paragraph 3, as we described in yesterday's report. We began to click and seek withheld facts, as we frequently do.

Sure enough! The story, of a type we love, turned out to be crazily wrong. But there it is, in The Atlantic!

Alas! We've had this experience with great frequency as we the liberals have continued to build a culture of true belief. In the case of Anderson's story, two questions come to mind:

First, does The Atlantic still employ editors? If so, what editor would have failed to spot the "false note" which throbbed and flashed and sounded so loudly in Anderson's paragraph 3?

That's a fairly narrow question. Here's a broader question:

What explains why we liberals are such suckers for such inaccurate tales? What makes us blow past a story's "false notes? What makes us swallow the "con?"

In last Sunday's New York Times, Maria Konnikova sought to answer that question. Having said that, we once again note a difference:

Konnikova wasn't discussing erroneous tribal belief. She was asking a somewhat similar question: what makes otherwise sensible people fall for the stories of "con men?"

What made an otherwise sensible college student blow all her money in a game of three-card monte? What made two otherwise sensible people fall in love with romantic hoaxers?

What made an otherwise sensible person fail to spot the warning signs in an art forgery scheme? On their face, Konnikova's case studies struck us as relatively trivial. But when we started reading her explanations for the power of the con, we felt that she was answering some of the questions we've been asking for years:

What makes us liberals fall in love with tribal stories which are grossly simplistic, perhaps to the point of being false? What makes us such easy marks?

What makes us liberals such easy marks? We were struck by the broad shape of Konnikova's implied answer.

Why do people fall for the stories of con men? Konnikova's explanation has two basic parts.

First, she notes the sheer power of stories. Good "con men" are skilled at telling false stories, Konnikova says. And stories are powerful tools.

"Stories are one of the most powerful forces of persuasion available to us," Konnikova writes. "Caught up in a powerful story, we become blind to inconsistencies that seem glaring in retrospect."

A well-told story is highly persuasive. "Faced with incongruous evidence, you dismiss the evidence rather than the story," Konnikova says. She quotes psychologist Seymour Epstein:

“It is no accident that the Bible, probably the most influential Western book of all time, teaches through parables and stories and not through philosophical discourse.”

A well-told story can sweep the listener away. As we noted long ago, Jesus employs no charts or graphs at any point in his ministry.

That said, why do we find some stories highly convincing—so convincing that we blow past their glaring "false notes"—while other stories may not grab us at all?

We were struck by Konnikova's suggestive answers. She was trying to explain why people fall for con men and hoaxers. But we kept reading phrases that sounded familiar to us.

According to Konnikova, we humans tend to have "a deep need to believe in a version of the world where everything really is for the best—at least when it comes to us." For us liberals, that may be a world where everyone else is abusing black kids, while we, the very good people, are appalled by those peoples' misconduct.

According to Konnikova, one of her victims "wasn’t greedy [for money]; she was just greedy for a certain reality." And that's where the talented con man comes in. For us, this passage rang quite a few bells:
KONNIKOVA (12/6/15): The stories the grifter tells aren’t real-world narratives—reality-as-is is dispiriting and boring. They are tales that seem true, but are actually a manipulation of reality. The best confidence artist makes us feel not as if we’re being taken for a ride but as if we are genuinely wonderful human beings who are acting the way wonderful human beings act and getting what we deserve. We like to feel that we are exceptional, and exceptional individuals are not chumps.
Con men make us feel "as if we are genuinely wonderful human beings who are acting the way wonderful human beings act?" We've long suggested that the need to feel that way seems to lie at the heart of our liberal tribe's familiar tribal tales.

We humans! “When people want to believe what they want to believe, they are very hard to dissuade.” So says David Sullivan, a professional cult infiltrator Konnikova quotes in her piece.

“There’s a desire to have a coherent worldview," Sullivan further says. Later, Konnikova quotes him again:
KONNIKOVA: Nobody thinks they are joining a cult, David Sullivan explains. “They join a group that’s going to promote peace and freedom throughout the world or that’s going to save animals, or they’re going to help orphans or something. But nobody joins a cult.” We don’t knowingly embraces false beliefs. We embrace something we think is as true as it gets. We don’t set out to be conned. We set out to become, in some way, better than we were before.
In Konnikova's view, "we set out to become, in some way, better than we were before." Might this lead us to believe the worst of everyone else, even where "false notes" are blaring, with warning lights flashing, in one of the stories we love?

The world of conservative talk became a bit cultish decade ago. There's nothing so dumb that it won't be believed as long as it comes from a tribal leader—and as long as it reinforces a certain highly simple-minded view of the wider world.

Are we liberals designing a similar culture? If so, can our all-too-human instinct and impulse really be good for the world?

Tomorrow: A well-received book

Small world department: Way back when, we took a freshman seminar, "Theory of emotions," from Professor Epstein, who Konnikova quotes. Improbably, we refer to the school year which started in September 1965!

Professor Epstein was extremely nice to us clueless freshmen. We always felt our work with him would eventually pay off!


  1. These lies serve a greater purpose. If the coloreds don't feel hopeless, how are we white progressives going to enjoy the good feelz of coming to their rescue and notifying the other Good People on social media?

  2. "Increasingly, we liberals seem to love stories of that type, even when such stories are false. For yesterday's report, click here."

    And here goes ConMan Bob, playing his rubes.

    He has no evidence, and has presented no evidence, that liberals love stories of any type, nor that they increasingly do so. Nor has he given any evidence that any story is false in the link provided.

    1. How do trolls con other commenters into replying to their nonsense?

    2. Like the good Bobfan, @ 2:19 can't think of a thing to say to justify this type of lie from the idol, Bob.

      "Sure enough! The story, of a type we love, turned out to be crazily wrong. But there it is, in The Atlantic!"

      Bob has demonstrated nothing about the story which was crazily wrong. He has demonstrated that he himself is more deserving of adjectives casting doubt on sanity.

    3. "Powell and her sons are not an anomaly"

      That was crazily wrong.

      Like our trolls.

  3. What explains why we liberals are such suckers for such inaccurate tales? What makes us blow past a story's "false notes? What makes us swallow the "con?"

    Of course conservatives also fall for inaccurate tales. I don't think Bob means to imply that conservatives aren't being conned. So, why does Bob ask specifically about liberals being suckers?

    1. Despite your presence here, this is a liberal blog. That's why he asks about liberals.

    2. What makes a blog "liberal"?

    3. Did you oversleep and miss Political Science 101?

    4. Despite your presence here this is a smart blog. That is why Bob makes fun of dumb people like you.

    5. The way people feel so free to insult David in Cal is very Maddow-like, by the way. Bob doesn't make fun of people like David in Cal;he is making fun of arrogant people like Anon 8:18.

    6. He invites insult. It would be impolite to refuse.

    7. Anon @ 11:12 you are as dumb as @ 7:53, who I believe was the commenter who isulted David in Cal th4e found himself unable to answer a question so offered more insults.

  4. For the record [LINK].

    [QUOTE]>>> My son has been suspended five times. He’s 3.

    By Tunette Powell July 24, 2014

    [Editor's note:] Tunette Powell is a motivational speaker and author. She is co-founder of The Truth Heals, a nonprofit for individuals and families affected by fatherlessness.

    [Picture caption:] Tunette Powell’s sons, JJ (left) and Joah, have been suspended from school eight times combined.

    I received a call from my sons’ school in March telling me that my oldest needed to be picked up early. He had been given a one-day suspension because he had thrown a chair. He did not hit anyone, but he could have, the school officials told me.

    JJ was 4 at the time.

    I agreed his behavior was inappropriate, but I was shocked that it resulted in a suspension.

    For weeks, it seemed as if JJ was on the chopping block. He was suspended two more times, once for throwing another chair and then for spitting on a student who was bothering him at breakfast. Again, these are behaviors I found inappropriate, but I did not agree with suspension.

    Still, I kept quiet. I knew my history. I was the bad preschooler.

    I was expelled from preschool and went on to serve more suspensions than I can remember. But I do remember my teachers’ disparaging words. I remember being told I was bad and believing it. I remember just how long it took me to believe anything else about myself.

    ...I believed my experience was isolated. I searched for excuses. Maybe I was just a bad kid. Maybe it had something to do with my father’s incarceration, which forced my mother to raise me and my brothers alone.

    ...Then, two months later, I was called to pick up my 3-year-old son, Joah. Joah had hit a staff member on the arm. After that incident, they deemed him a “danger to the staff.” Joah was suspended a total of five times. In 2014, my children have received eight suspensions.

    I blamed myself, my past. And I would have continued to blame myself had I not taken the boys to a birthday party for one of JJ’s classmates. At the party, the mothers congregated to talk about everyday parenting things, including preschool. As we talked, I admitted that JJ had been suspended three times. All of the mothers were shocked at the news.

    “JJ?” one mother asked.

    “My son threw something at a kid on purpose and the kid had to be rushed to the hospital,” another parent said. “All I got was a phone call.”

    One after another, white mothers confessed the trouble their children had gotten into. Some of the behavior was similar to JJ’s; some was much worse.

    Most startling: None of their children had been suspended....

    After that party, I read a study reflecting everything I was living.... <<<[END QUOTE]

    1. Anecdotal, but if you were yourself suspended and if your kids were getting suspended frequently, you should as a parent be meeting with school staff and perhaps a parenting counselor to figure out how to teach your kids better control. A parent who excuses the behavior as "just kids being kids" may be communicating that such behavior is OK when it will instead get them kicked out of schools, one after another.

      School staff do not have to put up with being kicked or bitten or spat on or otherwise harmed as "all in a day's work." It is reasonable for them to expect that parents will intervene so that the events don't happen again, over and over, as in this example.

      Not all black kids are being treated in a racist way. If they were, the stats would be different. If her kids are being treated more harshly because they are black, perhaps that means they have a greater need to learn self control at home before venturing into preschool to be stigmatized by their misbehavior. This mom needs to care more about her kids and less about curing a racist world that won't put up with her kids the way she imagines they do with white children (assuming that is at all true).

      I would be shocked if a mother permitted her kid to be suspended 5 times (or 3 times) without doing anything to help her child deal with the expectations for non-violent solutions to interpersonal conflicts. It is NOT normal for kids to kick, throw chairs, spit, etc. Just like it is not normal for a teen like Michael Brown to cuss out an officer. Those moms were shocked at her admission because they wouldn't let their kids engage in such behavior without doing something about it.

    2. Until you come up with a plan to get business to stop stiffing labor, STFU about parenting (or lack thereof).
      Parents don't have the time to spend with and teach their kids. They're too busy working multiple jobs and/ or longer hours due to being stiffed for their labor by business.

  5. "Alas! According to Anderson's cited sources, only one preschooler in every 400 gets suspended more than once in the course of a single school year. If Powell's sons got suspended four times each in that single school year, her experience had moved past the realm of the merely anomalous. She had entered the rarified statistical air of near impossibility."

    C'mon, Bob - Have you SEEN her kids ?!?

  6. I don't know why Bob did not pick up on this false tale when it was first getting started back in July 2014 in the Washington Post.

  7. !!! How To Get Your husband Back & Avoid Divorce !!!

    Glorious be unto Dr. Ukaka the great man and ever, my name is Sarah from Taxes city usa. since 1 and a half year I have witness what is called heart broken. my boyfriend that promised me marriage failed me and impregnate me and leave,he dump me,he stop calling" he stop picking my calls,and he no longer respond to me. I have be looking for solution,I fall into the hands of fake spell caster,they rough me off and took my money without help.I have cried,I have weep"and tears runs out of eyes. The silentness in my heart brought me to the deepest path of failure that I lost my job. Crying all day,because of my life was lonely. So thanks to Ukaka that came into my life and brought me the greatest joy that was lost. I saw his mail while browsing and I contact and tell him what I am passing through with no doubt because what saw about him,was enough to believe. And I was given words of solution on what to do. I can't really help thinking about it I have tried to see what I can do, I manage to provide him some materials and he help me with the rest,after casting the spell, 12hrs later he came with rose on his hand and I was even about going out,i saw him in front of my door when he sees me he knee and said he is dying I should forgive him and accept him back he was crying,I can't wait to let him finish I quickly crab him and kiss him, just then" he said he is restless without me, just as the prophet has said he will be. He brought out a ring and put it on my hand. Our wedding day was scheduled,1week after we got married. today makes it 2weeks and we are living happily I don't know how to praise him enough, he has done me a thing I can never forget. And I can't really share to myself alone, I want y'all to help me praise him because if it is wasn't for him I already plan of committing suicide. But right now I am now so happy more than I was before. And you out there crying for help you've already got one,Ukaka is the man that you need in all rampart. contact his address if you need his service, also contact him on his web site: