BREAKING: Experienced pilot lands damaged plane!


Angry prize winner crashes and burns:
Last Wednesday, a Southwest Airlines plane blew an engine mid-flight.

An experienced, highly skilled pilot skillfully landed the plane. Four days later, the Washington Post treated readers like total fools in its Sunday Outlook section.

The foolishness came from Beverly Weintraub, "who won a Pulitzer Prize as a member of the New York Daily News editorial board, is a member of the Ninety-Nines, International Organization of Women Pilots, and the board of directors of the Air Race Classic."

To our ear, that doesn't quite make sense either. But that's what the Post reported in its author identity line.

Weintraub seems to think we're all six years old. In the high-profile Outlook section, she started her essay like this, sillybill headline included:
WEINTRAUB (4/22/18): Why call the Southwest captain a 'female pilot'?

A feeling of pride swept through the small community of female pilots Wednesday
as word spread that the captain who had safely landed Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 after an engine blew out in midair the day before was a woman. But disappointment tempered that sentiment: Virtually all news coverage of the incident put the word "female" before "pilot." As a private pilot, aircraft owner and airplane racer, I shared both the pride and the disappointment.

Why not call the hero captain simply a pilot?
Was Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger—to whom captain Tammie Jo Shults was immediately and aptly compared—referred to as a "male pilot" after landing US Airways Flight 1549 in the Hudson River? And why the surprise that a former Navy fighter pilot and seasoned airline captain, as Shults is, could handle an emergency situation calmly and competently?
Please note:

Within her opening paragraph, Weintraub uses the term "female pilot" herself, then complains that others have done so. Weintraub, who belongs to the International Organization of Women Pilots, was wondering why a news org might refer to Shults in a similar way.

As we'll see below, Weintraub's claim about "virtually all news coverage" simply isn't true. But why might some news orgs have described Shults as a "female pilot?"

Duh. As Weintraub continued, it became clear that—Duh!—she already knew:
WEINTRAUB (continuing directly): Part of it could be the numbers: In 1960, there were 25 female air transport pilots—those licensed to fly for the airlines—in the United States; in 2016, there were 6,888, a huge increase but still only 4 percent of the U.S. airline pilot population. Overall, of nearly 600,000 pilots licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration, approximately 39,000 are women. That's about 6 percent, a proportion that has held steady for decades.
Duh. Based upon that murky prose, it sounds like only four percent of "pilots licensed to fly for the airlines" are women—and that's way more than in the past.

Many people may not know that there are any such pilots at all, let alone a pilot who performed a brilliant feat of air rescue.

Meanwhile, why did news orgs call attention to Shults' gender? They did so to praise her for her feat, as the latest report along the lines of "women can do these jobs too."

Such reporting may tend to be overdone, but in appropriate situations, it's also highly instructive. People are interested in this sort of thing! See Hidden Figures, the best-selling book which became an Oscar-nominated movie.

As a former Pulitzer winner, Weintraub may have felt obliged to make a factual overstatement. In fact, the term "female pilot" appeared in reports about this incident less often than Weintraub alleged. For example, it had never appeared in the Washington Post until Weintraub's utterly silly complaint hit the streets.

That said, the term was used on one occasion in the New York Times. It appeared in a second-day "tick tock" report on the way the terror in the skies unfolded.

Below, you see the passage in question. It's very, very hard to see what's supposed to be wrong about this:
HEALY AND HAUSER (4/19/18): In the cockpit, Tammie Jo Shults, a veteran Navy pilot, flew on with one engine, displaying what one passenger would later call ''nerves of steel.''

Ms. Shults was well trained to handle stress in the cockpit. She had flown supersonic F/A-18 Hornets as one of the Navy's first female pilots at a time when women were still barred from combat duty, before leaving active service in 1993. Ms. Shults calmly radioed air traffic controllers in Philadelphia to discuss her approach. She told them the flight was carrying injured passengers and needed emergency medics on the ground.
According to Nexis, that's the only time the term "female pilot" appeared in either the Post or the Times concerning this incident. Who could possibly think that something was wrong with that brief, informative passage in the Times?

(We're glad we got to read that account. We're also glad that little boys may have had a chance to hear that this is the sort of the thing the little girls around them will grow up to do.)

Weintraub's essay was silly, childish, stupid. As such, it typifies the work which is becoming more prevalent as pseudo-liberal culture bends toward the ethos of Always Finding A Way To Be Offended on the basis of "identity" issues.

(Why did, and do, so many reports say that Jackie Robinson was black? Could anyone be silly enough to ask?)

Our culture is awash in "identity breakthrough" reports. This is often overdone, but it's also completely appropriate. In this silly piece in the Post, Weinstraub reports that she and her fellow "female pilots" swelled with pride about Shults' brilliance. Then she says that she was offended by the use of the term "female pilot."

(We know—that isn't a flat contradiction. But it comes pretty darn close.)

Sad! As the culture of Taking Offense At All Times gathers steam in the pseudolib world, the Weinstraub types are increasingly enabled. Even as "a feeling of pride swept through the community of female pilots," one such pilot took offense at the (largely non-existent) use of the troubling term.

Do we live in an idiocracy? Work this silly appears in Outlook pretty much all the time. The Sunday Review is even worse. Once again, an award-winning question:

What kinds of creatures are we?


  1. ' the Washington Post treated readers like total fools in its Sunday Outlook section.'

    In the case of SOmerby, probably rightly so.

    1. Hello everyone out there, i want to testify of the great and wonderful work of DR harry has done for me with his herbal cream , in the past few years i have being going through a lot of hard times in many relationship am always into, because of the small size of my dick which was not big enough to satisfy a woman in bed , so which always end up in series of breakup in my relationship with women,because of this i have tried so many drugs and medicine enlarge my dick but did not work out, then i decided to search online for solution to my problem and then i came across so many testimony on how Dr HARRY HERBAL CREAM have helped them find solution to their problems,so i contacted him on his email and told him about my small penis and ejaculation issue, he told me not to worry that he will help me to be a real man again, i did not believe he can help me but i gave him a try,he told me what to do and then send me his herbal cream and medicine which i used for two weeks and it worked for me,now am a happy man. He can also cure diabetes,H.I.V and any kind of sickness you have. you can contact him on his email on ( This will be the end of your sexual problems and other problems or call his mobile phone +2349036417079 for more prove whatsapp me on +1(715)(303)(0893) thank you Dr Harry may God bless you ...      

  2. Look, She takes pride just like a Woman,
    But She breaks offened just like a
    little girl.

  3. 'Always Finding A Way To Be Offended on the basis of "identity" issues.'

    Perfect description of Somerby.

    Weintraub, a woman and a pilot,
    recounts several incidents of bigotry and negative stereotypes that she or her friends faced. She is speaking from personal experience.

    She asks the question " Why call the Southwest captain a 'female pilot'?" obviously as a way of highlighting the very facts that Somerby quotes and as a starting point for assessing the current state of affairs and the hurdles that she and others have faced. She NEVER says she was "offended" by the term "female pilot." She uses the word "disappointed." But the piece is also very emphatically celebratory.

    Weintraub is uniquely qualified to discuss this and Somerby comes off seeming like a cranky scold.

  4. "As the culture of Taking Offense At All Times gathers steam in the pseudolib world, the Weinstraub types are increasingly enabled."

    1. it has gathered steam decades ago. And
    2. There's nothing 'pseudo' about it. Normal liberal world, full of zombies.

    1. God is figment of dim-witted imaginations.

    2. For once Mao is right. And by that we mean RIGHT. The politics of resentment was mastered by conservaties in the post war years, Mao is a sniveling, blind, moronic child of those politics.

  5. "the Weinstraub types are increasingly enabled."

    (It's "Weintraub" not "Weinstraub" by the way.)

    What "type" would that be, Bob? Pulitzer Prize winning journalist? A member of the Ninety-Nines, International Organization of Women Pilots, and the board of directors of the Air Race Classic?

    Or an uppity woman who won't just be grateful she gets to be a journalist and a pilot, and who won't refrain from making herself heard on matters of discrimination? That "type?"

    1. I think you know exactly the "type" being referenced. The type who has to find some nit-picky bs to whine about in every little thing in life.

  6. “WEINTRAUB (4/22/18): Why call the Southwest captain a 'female pilot'?”

    “A feeling of pride swept through the small community of female pilots Wednesday…”

    Yes, from headline straight to opening paragraph. That really does say it all. Right there. So yes, “Weintraub's essay was silly, childish, stupid.” From the get go, that is I mean, immediately. It would be difficult to go much further, given an attentive reader.

    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

  7. What kind of creatures are we? Get your copy right here:

    1. Nice. I liked his reply re: religion in this bit.

      Sage of our times, an unparalleled blender of ideas and morality. Speaking for myself, of course.


    2. I prefer the Ninja Super.

      To the question - What's it all about, Alfie? - here's the answer:

  8. Hello Every One Out Here.

    I'm from USA Dallas. Am writing this great article to appreciate the good work of Dr IyaryI. I have been married for 2 years with pain and agony because my husband left me for another lady. I was reviewing some post on the internet on how i could get back my husband then, i saw a post by Kim Carberry from Canada. who testified of Dr IyaryI the almighty spiritual caster. I contacted Kim Carberry to confirm about Dr IyaryI and she guaranteed me and gave me the courage to contact Dr IyaryI for help. So, i contacted him and he assured me that my days of sorrows are over that i will get back my husband within 24 hours. I did all what he told me and am very happy today that my husband is back to me and we are now living happily like never before and i can boldly and proudly testify to the world that Dr IyaryI is a good and remarkable helper that specializes on different kind of spells. If you need his help, then contact him on E-mail: ( And also Reach him on WhatsApp Number: +2349057915709 Thanks Dr IyaryI


  9. Sir I am the happpiest woman today in this whole wide world. Dr. joy you really did it..Yes.. Its a miracle and everlasting pleasure and cheerfulness for me and my family today..Thank you Sir for your precious help. You are a genuine spell caster and you will never be forgotten for making me a fulfilled woman once again.. You are my hero.. The kids are overjoyed to have their father come back home for him if you need urgent help in your relationship.via or can also call him or add him on Whats-app: +2348100452479.