Candidate Harris once dated Brown!


Malfunctioning minds want to know:
In a world which largely lacks talent among its elites, it has been an amazing thing to see new talent emerge.

Last year, we thought that campaign ad by Candidate Ocasio-Cortez was one of the greatest political statements we had ever seen. In part, its greatness lay in the way the candidate delivered the text of her ad.

We were thrilled to see her talent put on display once again when she spoke with Stephen Colbert last week.

More on that appearance below. To watch the first segment, click here.

We were also struck to see the way talent emerged when Kamala Harris held her initial rally in Oakland last Sunday. Harris displayed a rare command presence on stage—and the highly important ability to laugh and broadly smile.

When others liked Harris' lines of questioning in several Senate hearings last year, we found her a bit demagogic. That said, we were thrilled to see talent emerging last Sunday.

Because real talent is very rare, we've been thrilled to see it emerge. Then we found ourselves reading this, the start of a very short op-ed column by California honcho Willie brown, for whom we did radio spots for a number of months not that many years back:
BROWN (1/29/19): I've been peppered with calls from the national media about my "relationship" with Kamala Harris, particularly since it became obvious that she was going to run for president. Most of them, I have not returned.

Yes, we dated. It was more than 20 years ago...
That was the start of Brown's confession. Where we were thrilled to see talent emerge, the malfunctioning machines who constitute a large part of our upper-end press apparently wanted to talk about dating and sex.

These idiots simply can't help it. As we've told you again and again, this is the only type of topic they actually care about.

They care about who's zoomin' who. They also care about wardrobe and hair, and they acre a great deal about the phony quotations they choose as a group to invent.

These idiots simply can't help it. But neither can the corporate pseudo-progressives who are currently defining the scripts for our own floundering tribe.

We hate to criticize Monica Hesse again, but we think her new column in the Washington Post offers a case in point. Our analysis will run on this post-Aristotelian fuel:
"Man [sic] is the animal which lives by script alone."
We humans love to peddle our various tribal scripts. Under prevailing rules of the game, all the facts must be rearranged to fit these treasured narratives. It seems to us that this rule was in play even as Hesse got started:
HESSE (1/30/19): As of this week, women are running for president—multiple women—and lo, the country has been awarded the chance for a do-over. This time, we swear, we won’t order them to smile more if they really want our votes. This time, we’ll stop using phrases such as “likable enough?” when what we really mean is, “too many ovaries?”

Columnist, "sigh" right back at you! Hesse starts by pimping the silly idea that male candidates haven't been dogged, in recent decades, by the question of "likability." Beyond that, she pretends that Candidate Obama's giant smile wasn't correctly cited, again and again, as one of the secrets to his success.

Harris' completely believable smile and laughter will be an important weapon for her, just as large believable smiles have helped male pols in the past. Indeed, when we watched Ocasio-Cortez speaking with Colbert last week, we were struck by her amazing ability to bring the spirit of pleasure, enjoyment and fun to her discussion, as Bill Clinton did so long ago, agreeing to blow on his sax.

Beyond that, AOC's smile is very large, as was Obama's before her. This is a very large part of her talent, with which she's advancing important progressive ideas at an astounding rate.

A smile is a very important tool, in entertainment or politics. So is likability, even if the malfunctioning cyborgs of the upper-end press have massively overplayed likability in recent decades, routinely using it as a weapon against those pols they disfavor.

A smile is a very important tool but, in tribal journalism, the script is all there is. For that reason, we keep encountering inane discussions from everyone including Samantha Bee, in which progressives pretend that likability questions are visited on female candidates only.

Aristotle is said to have said that we human are "the rational animal." If he meant what he's often taken to have meant by that, it's clear that, for all his erudition, the great Greek never had cable.

All across the modern landscape, man [sic], including women, does little except peddle script. Every fact is made to fit the pre-existing story line. Distinctions will always be drawn to further the narrative, no matter how flimsy or tedious:
HESSE: Plenty of us have, after all, spent an awful lot of time discussing Bill Clinton’s willie and Anthony Weiner’s wiener: it’s not that we don’t talk about the sexual predilections of male candidates.

But we do talk about them in a different way.
We talk about men abusing power. We talk about women not even deserving power. The distinction matters...
These peddlers will always find a distinction designed to Keep Script Alive.

The idiots of the mainstream press have been chasing the sex lives of male pols ever since they literally hid in the bushes to take out Gary Hart. On liberal cable, the deranged Rachel Maddow just couldn't stop playing the Bentley telephone sex tape. She'd cover her ears and play "little girl" to pretend that she hated doing it.

These idiots have been doing this since 1987. They've changed the course of world history as they play their childish games. People are dead all over the world because they misfire this way and no, they don't plan to stop.

But in the mind of the reader of script, the current preferred tribal story line must always prevail. In the world of script-readers like Hesse, female pols have been attacked in unique, special ways—and that assertion must be the end of the story.

Citizens, can we talk? It isn't that these manifest idiots need to stop discussing the sex lives of female pols. They have to stop diddling themselves in this way in general.

They need to get their small, empty heads our of the nation's underwear drawers. But if you're the Washington Post "gender columnist," you will never say such a thing. Instead, you'll end your column peddling script in this way:
HESSE: [Willie Brown] wasn’t her boss. The relationship was consensual. Dating a technically still-married man 30 years one’s senior might not be the relationship choice that most of us would make, but it’s understandable that smart government officials in San Francisco’s political scene would end up socializing with each other. Was Harris supposed to date only morons with whom she had nothing in common?

Welcome to the 2020 campaign. I’m not saying there are easy answers to all of my questions. But the only way a woman is ever going to be elected to the top of anything is if we stop making insinuations about how she got there.
Hesse isn't claiming that there are easy answers to all her questions. That said, here's the last question she asked:
"Was Harris supposed to date only morons with whom she had nothing in common?"
Is Hesse so broken that she means to imply that we should be trying to answer that question? Aristotle's error is on full display whenever these script-readers scrawl.

Actual talent has been emerging, on TV and in the public square. As it does, the broken machines of the national "press corps" struggle to drag it on down.

Tomorrow: At the childish, Hamptons-based New York Times, script must now rule all


  1. We're in a race to the bottom. Ocasio-Cortez has wildly succeeded by saying outrageous things, regardless of whether they're true or not. She actually said, "Facts don't matter when you're morally correct." This was also Trump's approach Now that fact-free speaking has worked so well for both of them, we can expect other politicians to follow suit. This is not a pleasant thing to contemplate. 😞

    1. David finally notices the Right-wing has created a stampede to the bottom.
      Happy 1987, David. I hope it turns out to be a learning year for you.


      DAinCA is a moral and intellectual idiot. You may safely ignore anything he has to say. There’s no right-wing piece of nonsense he won’t swallow whole and then regurgitate here.

      Did AOC “actually” say, “"Facts don't matter when you're morally correct."

      Of course not. Save yourself the time and ignore DAinCA. For the record, here’s what she actually said

      There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right.

      I will propose the following hypothetical to illustrate:

      Suppose a reporter asked some Trump administration official, “Why have you taken thousands of children away from their parents seeking asylum?” and the official said, “It’s only 1,987 children.”

      Now, supposing the number is accurate, the official is being precise and factual because 1,987 is less than two thousand, which is the number required to make the plural noun thousands semantically correct.

      But that wouldn’t be the issue, would it?

      Don’t waste your time on this commentariat’s village idiot.

    3. David - "now" you say!???

      Do you know who Frank Luntz is? Facts have not mattered to Republican leadership for multiple decades .

      "The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. "That's not the way the world really works anymore." He continued "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors … and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."

      Karl Rove to Ron Suskind,2004

    4. One political hack invented a story about another political hack, and then it's somehow important to know the name of the third political hack?

      Obviously, the 'facts' (whatever that is) don't matter to political hacks (at least from the time of Ancient Greece, I'm sure), but what is your point, demot?

    5. AnonymousJanuary 30, 2019 at 3:20 PM - I pretty much agree with you that facts don't matter to Republican leadership. Same for Democratic leadership. And, even more so for Socialist leadership, e.g., Venezuela. One way to deal with this situation is to not let the government take on optional duties. Fact-deprived political leaders are apt to screw them up.

    6. Well, in this particular case, this clown-ness - if she really did say "facts don't matter when you're morally correct" - she freely and openly admits that she's not planning to appeal to reason, but to push emotional hot buttons instead.

      Now, that unusual, I'd say. Either pre-enlightenment or postmodern. Well, or both, I suppose...

    7. 5:10 She didn't say "Facts don't matter when you're morally correct." That is a false claim. Do your research dumbass.

    8. "And to demonization of all opponents, obviously."

      Hillary Clinton says "Hello". She also asked how fucking stupid do you have to be to not realize every Right-wing accusation is a confession.

  2. Somerby, playing dumb once again. Hesse’s column is a response to crap like this *from the right wing* (quoted in Hesse’s column):

    “Hey @KamalaHarris given that you’re so vocal about the #MeToo movement, what are your thoughts on sleeping your way to the top of your political career?” queried right-wing pundit Tomi Lahren in a representative tweet.

    Hesse is *defending* Harris from this bullshit, not sliming her with it.

    Can Somerby really not see the difference?

  3. I’m glad to see Somerby finally expressing some positive opinions about someone. But will he criticize Ocasio-Cortez for this:

    “Do you believe President Trump is a racist?" Cooper asked.

    "Yeah, yeah, no question," Ocasio-Cortez replied.

    "When you look at the words that he uses, which are historic dog whistles of white supremacy. When you look at how he reacted to the Charlottesville incident where neo-Nazis murdered a woman, versus how he manufactures crises like immigrants seeking legal refuge on our borders, it's night and day," she continued.”

    Racism? White supremacy? Is she right? Somerby has denounced liberals for using this kind of language previously.

    1. Her smile was so nice he didn't notice. Feel the Power Of The Smile.

    2. Ocasio-Cortez is a Bernie supporter so Somerby will push her here just as he shoved Bernie at us. Smiles have nothing to do with good ideas, experience or competence. If all you want is a nice smile, you are voting for the wrong reasons.

  4. Ah yes, the current lib-zombie super-demigoddess, establishment puppet wannabe. Sure, sure.

    But what about the previous super-demigoddess establishment puppet wannabe named 'Michelle Obama'?

    She has gotta be awfully jealous, right about now. Eh, Bob?

    1. Yeah. What about Mao's gibberish, Bob?

  5. Finally I found a great post with interesting topic. I read every points of this post that is really so enjoyable and I have bookmark your site for get back again here Essay writing service

  6. For those of you who seem misguided about recent events in Venezuela, here is a tiny serving of info to aide in gaining some historical context:

    Trump on Libya: "We should attack it for 50% of oil"

    "Y'know in the old days....."

  7. No matter how old you are, family history is important. While you might not think so at the time, as you get older there will be things you and your grandchildren will want to know. Most of us don't realize it until the older generations are gone and you can't replace first hand comments. Don't just put in about the good times, add in the harder times and how you overcame those trials. Another thing to remember is what caused the deaths of those you loved. There are many things that have been found to continue into future generations that knowing it runs in the family can be helped with now or possible in the future. prevention starts with knowing where to start. I wish someone had taken the time to write these things down for mew to be able to go back to. My Grandmother and my mother told us many stories of what things happened in their lives and about the people in their lives. I now wish someone had written those things down since both have passed now. But I never thought at that busy point in my life that I would one day want to remember all those things. So much family history is lost when the older generations are gone. Please pass it on to your family while you can. You can even just do it digitally so it can be accessed by family later on.Family pictures are something to cherish also. Just be sure to write down who is pictured in them, where they are taken and when. I have found family pictures that no one now even knows who is in them.

  8. I Read You Post I Love This Blog And Bookmark Your Blog

    Pakistani Escorts in Dubai

  9. In our simple life love play a major role in it, going through a heartbreak can course you to lose focus, being in love doesn’t means that there will not be challenges or argument but it take a mature minds to handle the situation, if you are having issues in your relationship or going a break up, you can simply contact Dr Ekpen for solution he will help you bring love back into your relationship. Contact him via or whatsapp +2347050270218.