DAYS OF IMPEACHMENT: Long day's journey into...

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2019

...the problem we all live with:
We're afraid that we've spent the bulk of the day watching the bulk of the hearings. Along the way, we even had a computer meltdown!

For today, we're glad that Fiona Hill spoke up on behalf of Kenneth Vogel's reporting. We were intrigued by her statement that Christopher Steele got played, though we still don't know to what extent that assessment may be accurate.

More than anything else, we thought we saw the current version of the problem we all live with. Since there will be no hearings tomorrow, we'll try to explain what we mean.

We'll probably start with the mugging and clowning we get on our own cable channel. Mugging and clowning is Trumpism too. Trumpism didn't begin with Trump, and the Trumpism could get worse before it ever gets better.

What is the problem we all live with? Of one thing we can be sure—your excellent question is anthropological, pretty much all the way down!

Tomorrow: Days of impeachment end

47 comments:

  1. Even if you consider Trump's actions assuming that his beliefs about the Bidens and the Ukraine are all true, his offenses are still impeachable. When you consider that the conspiracy theories were made up to manipulate him, then there are others who need to be held responsible beyond Trump and beyond Roger Stone. When you consider that the conspiracy theories were made up and spread to benefit Russia, then those actions rise to treason and the crimes are even more serious. But there is no way to see the facts as exculpatory, innocent or in any way justifying Trump's actions with respect to Ukraine.

    If we are to unite our country, it must be upon the bedrock of our constitution and our republic. Anything or anyone who works against that foundation can be judged as needing change. If that means we must throw out party labels and redefine what it means to be partisan, that's happened before.

    It won't matter who is nominated if we cannot hold Trump and his associates responsible for their crimes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Meanwhile, Somerby thinks that mugging and clowning are the problem.

      Delete
    2. Not really. We are torturers and warmongers. On both sides. Obama was a torturer and a murderer. Trump is a torturer and a murderer. Torture and murder are violations of the Constitution as are all of our illegal wars ane many other violations.

      Your little cherry pick is cute and pins you as one of the gullible. One of the TV babies. Enjoy your little fantasy show.

      Delete
    3. Anything goes!
      You're going to have to take a number to get in line to shoot a cop.

      Delete
    4. "bedrock of the Constitution", that has to be the dumbest defense of this idiotic impeachment sideshow.

      Delete
    5. So Trump shouldn't demand corrupt nations we're giving money to investigate corruption, in the event that said corruption involves potential political opponents?

      What even is the value of this whole Ukraine thing? What is the value in fighting Russia? What is the supposed point?

      Delete
    6. Well, maybe this is the point: a simple distraction PSYOP, to take attention away from what they do:

      Amid Impeachment Circus, Dems Sneak PATRIOT Act Renewal Past The American People

      Delete
    7. ...plus they are shitting bricks waiting for developments of that 'origins of russagate' investigation. Trying to inoculate themselves.

      Delete
    8. So Trump shouldn't demand corrupt nations we're giving money to investigate corruption, in the event that said corruption involves potential political opponents?

      Let’s leave aside the absolutely risible notion that the Grifter-in-Chief was interested in corruption, whether in Ukraine or anywhere else. Instead, let’s pretend that your question has merit, and rephrase it as “What should Trump have done if he felt that corruption in Ukraine was a problem and that said corruption involved his potential political opponents?”

      A number of things come to mind. Trump could have requested that US aid to Ukraine be contingent on a Presidential finding. Or Trump could have asked Congress for a recision of the aid. Or Trump could have invoked our mutual legal assistance treaty with Ukraine, which would have made his AG responsible for exchanging information with Ukrainian officials about criminal acts committed by Americans in Ukraine.

      The problem with these legal courses of action is that there was no evidence against the Bidens, père et fils. Outside of right-wing fever dreams, no one even suspected them of criminal activity.

      So instead, Trump withheld military aid in return for an announcement from the President of Ukraine of an investigation into the Bidens. This led thereby to two problems: (1) Trump requested the intervention of a foreign country in a US election and (2) Trump impounded Congressionally authorized appropriations. Both of these actions were illegal. The first violated US election laws; the second was an abuse of power under Train v City of New York, 420US35 (1975).

      What even is the value of this whole Ukraine thing? What is the value in fighting Russia? What is the supposed point?

      This is a separate matter, one not germane to the question of Trump’s treason, bribery, and high crimes and misdemeanors.

      Delete
    9. "The problem with these legal courses of action is that there was no evidence against the Bidens", blah, blah, blah, zombie talking point.

      The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

      https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthpoll_us_100219/

      "The Monmouth poll also finds that 43% of registered voters believe Trump’s claim that Biden probably did pressure Ukrainian officials to keep them from investigating his son’s business interests there. This compares to 37% who say that Biden probably did not do this and 20% who are unsure. Among self-identified Republicans and Republican-leaning voters, 67% say Biden probably did this and 15% say he did not, with 17% being unsure. Among self-identified Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters, 21% say Biden probably did this and 60% say he did not, with 18% being unsure. Among true independents, 39% say Biden probably did this and 27% say he did not, with 34% being unsure."

      Delete
    10. deadrat - start on page 33 and read carefully from there.

      Get back to the herd, sheep boy.

      Delete
    11. Mao, thanks for making my point for me. If there were evidence, you could cite it. Polls of what people believe are evidence of nothing more than what people believe.

      Delete
    12. You're welcome, dembot. If your "outside of right-wing fever dreams, no one even suspected them of criminal activity" is a zombie newspeak equivalent of 'a large plurality of the registered US voters', then yes, the point stands. Sorry, I'm not as fluent in your newspeak as I would like to be.

      As for the strict legalsms that you require (though only for this particular category of crimes: crimes associated with your zombie cult), you may want to examine the sworn affidavit of Mr Shokin, direct witness of the above-mentioned criminal activity. You can find it here: witness statement of Viktor Shokin, among many other places.

      Excerpt:
      “The truth is that I was forced out because I was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into Burisma Holdings, a natural gas firm active in Ukraine, and Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, was a member of the Board of Directors.

      On several occasions, President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the criminal case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company, but I refused to close this investigation. Therefore, I was forced to leave office under direct and intense pressure from Joe Biden and the Obama administration. In my conversations with Poroshenko at the time, he was emphatic that I should cease my investigations regarding Burisma. When I did not, he said that the US (via Biden) were refusing to release the USD$ 1 billion promised to Ukraine. He said that he had no choice, therefore, but to ask me to resign.”

      Hope it helps.

      Delete
    13. https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/427618359-Shokin-Statement-1.pdf

      Delete
    14. What difference does it make if Biden is guilty as fuck? Investigate his ass. Fine. But that doesn’t require Trump to engage in an illegal shakedown of Ukraine to get that to happen. Even if Biden is guilty, Trump is also guilty of crimes.

      Delete
    15. What crimes, dembot?

      Delete
    16. “56 percent of Americans agree that Trump has committed an impeachable offense.”

      (Share of respondents in an Ipsos/FiveThirtyEight poll who said they think Trump has committed an impeachable offense)

      If public opinion is good enough to convict Biden, it’s good enough to convict Trump.

      Replace “crime” with “impeachable offenses” if it makes you feel better.

      Delete
    17. First of all, dembot, 56 percent of Americans do not agree that Trump has committed an impeachable offense. I don't know where you got this dembottery.

      And who said that public opinion is good enough to convict anyone? Voices inside your zombie head?

      The dembot above claimed that "outside of right-wing fever dreams, no one even suspected them [Bidens] of criminal activity", and I demonstrated that it was a dembot lie. That's all.

      Delete
    18. Poll: 70% of Americans say Trump's Ukraine actions were 'wrong,' 51% want him removed

      (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/18/poll-seventy-percent-trump-ukraine-actions-wrong/4227312002/)

      If you want to play the poll game...

      Delete
    19. No, I don't, dembot.

      I'm quite satisfied with you admission that Creepy Joe and his son are very likely a couple of criminals, who should be investigated and, with any luck, tried and convicted. And then sentenced to a jail term with confiscation of property. Actually, I'd be satisfied with just the confiscation of property.

      Karma, man. Karma.

      Delete
    20. You, just like Trump, want Biden convicted and removed from the race. Coincidentally, Biden leads Trump in all head-to-head matchups, so it’s no wonder you and Trump want Biden gone or tainted. Trump is terrified he’ll lose in a fair election.

      I feel your pain.

      Delete
    21. But dembot, I thought you believe that “56 percent of Americans agree that Trump has committed an impeachable offense”.

      And if that's true, your zombie cult has nothing to worry about: it's virtually impossible for your zombie cult to lose.

      Relax.

      Well, unless, of course, all of you, zombies, are concentrated in New England, NY, and California.

      As for "tainted", didn't you, at 11:17 AM, called him "guilty as fuck"? And if it wasn't you, what are you doing masquerading as someone else?

      Delete
    22. Right-wingers waiving away treason against the United States of America is the least surprising thing to happen in my lifetime.

      Delete
    23. I wasn’t careful enough. And, of course, I deserve what I get for engaging with a troll. No one suspected the Bidens of criminal activity before trumpbots like you started broadcasting your nonsense.

      And speaking of criminal activity, trumpbot, where’s the evidence? Hell, I’ll settle for any specific allegation, something any legitimate criminal case starts with. Got anything, troll?

      I didn’t think so.

      I don’t know what “strict legalisms” means here. This isn’t something I require. The law in this country requires very strict legal guidelines. Trump strayed over the line. I notice you don’t even try to gainsay that claim.

      Imagine my surprise.

      No, I’m not interested in the self-serving “sworn affidavit” of Shokin, a notoriously corrupt prosecutor. His own deputy repudiated the claims in that affidavit. The Ukrainian legislature removed Shokin for his corrupt operation of the prosecutor’s office. The “investigation” Shokin claimed he was conducting into Burisma covered a time period before Hunter Biden took his position on Burisma’s board.

      You may want to examine the statement of Shokin’s successor, Lutsenko. You can find it here:

      “From the perspective of Ukrainian legislation, he did not violate anything,” former Ukrainian prosecutor general Yuri Lutsenko told The Washington Post in his first interview since the disclosure of a whistleblower complaint alleging pressure by President Trump on Ukraine’s president, Volodymr Zelensky.

      Hope it helps.

      If you don’t mind, I’m going back to ignoring you, troll.

      And even if you do.

      Delete
    24. "And speaking of criminal activity, trumpbot, where’s the evidence?"

      Dembot, are you dumb? We've already gone through this: the sworn affidavit signed by Mr Shokin, the person in the center of the affair.

      "No, I’m not interested in the self-serving “sworn affidavit” of Shokin, a notoriously corrupt prosecutor."

      That's fine. However, if you aren't interested in something, it doesn't disappear from the universe.

      Also, wasn't it you who just yesterday passionately insisted that calling someone corrupt doesn't make it so? Not to mention that it's utterly irrelevant whether Mr Shokin is corrupt or not. It only matters if the affidavit is accurate.

      "The Ukrainian legislature removed Shokin for his corrupt operation of the prosecutor’s office"

      That's another dembot lie. The parliament voted precisely to approve his resignation on his own free will.

      " The “investigation” Shokin claimed he was conducting into Burisma covered a time period before Hunter Biden took his position on Burisma’s board."

      It's irrelevant what crimes of Burisma were investigated. Buisma paid Creepy Joe's Mafia Family to protect Burisma, and that's what Creepy Joe did.

      "former Ukrainian prosecutor general Yuri Lutsenko told The Washington Post"

      Someone who has no direct knowledge of the events in question expressed his opinion, in an interview. That's fine, but irrelevant.

      Lutsenko also said Yovanovitch ordered him not to prosecute criminals under her protection. In that one, he was a direct witness. So, then, Lutsenko is the one to be trusted by you dembots? Good.

      Delete
    25. We've already gone through this….

      Sorry, I so rarely read your comments that I probably missed your previous attempts. But this effort actually seems like an argument. Not one supported by fact, but not simply trollery either. Are you feeling all right?

      Mr Shokin, the person in the center of the affair.

      Mr Shokin was in the center of many affairs. Look up the Diamond Prosecutor affair.

      [I]i you aren't interested in something, it doesn't disappear from the universe.

      Trumpbot, please. I’m not claiming Shokin’s self-serving statement has disappeared from the universe. I’m saying that it’s not good evidence of anything.

      Also, wasn't it you who just yesterday passionately insisted that calling someone corrupt doesn't make it so?

      Don’t think so, but I’m getting decrepit in my old age. Of course, calling someone corrupt doesn’t make it so, just as a demonstrably-corrupt prosecutor signing an affidavit doesn’t make the claims of the affidavit so.

      The parliament voted precisely to approve his resignation on his own free will.

      Bwahahahaha. Of his own free will! Oh, Trumpbot, that’s adorable.

      It's irrelevant what crimes of Burisma were investigated.

      Oh, that goes without saying. It’s even irrelevant whether “crimes of Burisma” existed at all. All that matters, as Zelensky found out, is that a nebulous, unsubstantiated charge be made and a non-existent “investigation” be announced.

      Someone who has no direct knowledge of the events in question expressed his opinion, in an interview. That's fine, but irrelevant.

      Trumpbot, please. Lutsenko succeeded Shokin as Prosecutor General. It’s your opinion that’s fine but irrelevant.

      So, then, Lutsenko is the one to be trusted by you…?

      Right back atcha, Trumpbot. I’ll see your Shokin and raise you a Lutsenko. Whaddaya got?

      Bupkis.

      Delete
    26. "I’m not claiming Shokin’s self-serving statement has disappeared from the universe. I’m saying that it’s not good evidence of anything."

      Dembot, you demanded a legal evidence. A sworn affidavit signed the direct witness, who is also the main participant, in the center of the affair in question, is definitely legal evidence, as good as anyone could possibly hope for.

      If it doesn't satisfy you, an anonymous commenter, tsk, alas, it's not possible to please everyone. Not to mention: to please a dembot.

      However, if you're implying that Mr Shokin was lying in a sworn affidavit, then you're accusing Mr Shokin of a crime.

      Plus, if indeed Mr Shokin lied in that affidavit, he is certainly guilty of defamation, damaging your granddaddy's, Creepy Joe's, good name and reputation.

      Naturally, I suggest this crime should be thoroughly investigated, and Mr Shokin, should he be found guilty, is severely punished.

      So, I guess it's investigation either way, dembot. And since your granddaddy has nothing to fear from this investigation, I am puzzled - puzzled! - that he's fighting tooth and nail to avoid it...

      Delete
    27. A sworn affidavit signed the direct witness, who is also the main participant, in the center of the affair in question, is definitely legal evidence, as good as anyone could possibly hope for.

      Oh, Shokin was definitely a “main participant,” a most amusing euphemism. And “as good as anyone could possibly hope for”! Bwahahahahahaha! Oh, Trumpbot, please stop. You’re killing me with this. I will say that Shokin’s affidavit is at least as reliable as Michael Flynn’s statements to the FBI about his contacts with the Russian ambassador.

      Naturally, I suggest this crime should be thoroughly investigated, and Mr Shokin, should he be found guilty, is severely punished.

      Sure thing, Trumpbot. Take your suggestion to the Ukrainian authorities.

      (By the way, Trumpbot. If Shokin’s affidavit ever made it to a US court to be laughed out of, it would be testimony, thereby privileged, and ineligible for an action for defamation.)

      Is Biden “fighting tooth and nail to avoid investigation”? How could he even do that? An investigation would be initiated by the Department of Justice, an agency over which neither Biden has any influence. I wonder why they haven’t started an investigation? No evidence, absolute immunity, and no jurisdiction would be my guess, but hey, what do I know?

      I’ll tell you what, Trumpbot. After your errand at the Ukrainian embassy (3350 M St NW), drop by the Department of Justice (950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW) to tell them to investigate. It’s less than three miles. You could walk it. You could even pass the White House on your way.

      Let me know how that works out for you.

      Delete
    28. Here, dembot, Creepy Joe affair update, for your reading pleasure:

      https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/state-department-releases-detailed-accounts-biden-ukraine-corruption

      Contact your spiritual zombie-adviser, and ask for more doubleplusgood talking points.

      Delete
    29. Thanks, Trumpbot, for the link to right-wing site for anonymous wingnuts.

      Detailed account? Bwahahahahahaha!

      You mean the account where Yuriy Lutsenko, former Prosecutor General of Ukraine and now under indictment for abuse of power, says that he believes that Hunter Biden got lotsa money from Burisma. backing this claim with some unposted document from Latvia (!) that doesn’t list any amounts?

      The Yuriy Lutsenko, the Prosecutor General with no legal training, who hassled Marie Yovanovitch, our Ambassador to Ukraine, whom Rudy Giuliani slimed and got fired? The Yuriy Lutsenko who claimed Yovanovitch gave him a do-not-prosecute list that he admitted didn’t exist? The Yuriy Lutsenko who has said that any legal action against the Bidens must be initiated by the US?

      That Yuriy Lutsenko?

      Trumpbot, please. When I asked for evidence, I expected at least the section of the United States Code that Hunter Biden was supposed to have violated.

      None of this says that Hunter Biden is on the side of the angels. But you’re gonna have to do better than claims about Latvian documents that don’t even specify the amounts of corrupt money that Biden was supposed to have handled.

      Hey, Trumpbot! Who do you suppose will be indicted first, Hunter Biden or Rudy Giuliani?

      C’mon, Trumpbot, ‘fess up. You’re just trolling me, right?

      Well, troll better.

      Delete
  2. 'Mugging', dear Bob? I'm glad you realize that your zombie politicians are muggers, but I don't see how it's a 'Trumpism'. In fact, it's the opposite of Trumpism. Trumpism is peace and prosperity and minimum bullshit.

    You're talking like a word-salad dembot, dear Bob, and you really should try to avoid becoming one.

    And same goes for clowning, incidentally. He does much less of it than your zombie politicians, and, unlike them, he even occasionally tells the truth, straight-up, which is refreshing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't get your panties in a bunch, Mao. Republicans in the Senate aren't going to vote to convict Trump. You couldn't find 20 people of the 100 million who call themselves Republicans in this country, who have a problem with treason against the United States of America.

      Delete
  3. I'm guessing TDH will ignore impeachment and complain about Maddow or about something that happened in 1999, which is par for the course for the Trumptard that he is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You'll rue the day you didn't appreciate his wise council as you're pressed into the camps. I'll laugh, and will not feel sorry. Not a bit sorry.

      Delete
    2. What makes you think you won’t be in those same camps, anon 11:24?

      Delete
  4. tinfoil hats for fifty, alexNovember 22, 2019 at 12:27 AM

    "... we're glad that Fiona Hill spoke up on behalf of Kenneth Vogel's reporting."

    https://www.cjr.org/public_editor/biden-vogel-nyt-ukraine-hunter.php

    What's next, Somerby: a 3-week series on John Solomon's journalistic greatness?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And Somerby has never praised Vogel himself. As a matter of fact, Somerby never once mentioned Vogel’s recent stories about the Bidens, all while he was complaining that news orgs weren’t looking into it.

      Delete
  5. Hey Bob. Another one of you favorite subjects:

    NYTimes Pans "Cult Leader" Gabbard's White Pant Suit After Praising Hillary For Same Outfit

    Alas, it's not one of your zombie gods who is being smeared here, so you'll probably nod in agreement...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ha ha ha ha.
      The Times didn't even refer to her white hood.

      Delete
  6. Mugging and clowning are part of teaching. It is hard to imagine Somerby was a good teacher when he abhors mugging and clowning.

    ReplyDelete
  7. i am ERIC BRUNT by name. Greetings to every one that is reading this testimony. I have been rejected by my wife after three(3) years of marriage just because another Man had a spell on her and she left me and the kid to suffer. one day when i was reading through the web, i saw a post on how this spell caster on this address AKHERETEMPLE@gmail.com have help a woman to get back her husband and i gave him a reply to his address and he told me that a man had a spell on my wife and he told me that he will help me and after 3 days that i will have my wife back. i believed him and today i am glad to let you all know that this spell caster have the power to bring lovers back. because i am now happy with my wife. Thanks for helping me Dr Akhere contact him on email: AKHERETEMPLE@gmail.com
    or
    call/whatsapp:+2349057261346










    i am ERIC BRUNT by name. Greetings to every one that is reading this testimony. I have been rejected by my wife after three(3) years of marriage just because another Man had a spell on her and she left me and the kid to suffer. one day when i was reading through the web, i saw a post on how this spell caster on this address AKHERETEMPLE@gmail.com have help a woman to get back her husband and i gave him a reply to his address and he told me that a man had a spell on my wife and he told me that he will help me and after 3 days that i will have my wife back. i believed him and today i am glad to let you all know that this spell caster have the power to bring lovers back. because i am now happy with my wife. Thanks for helping me Dr Akhere contact him on email: AKHERETEMPLE@gmail.com
    or
    call/whatsapp:+2349057261346

    ReplyDelete
  8. My Name is Dr sebi you can Contact Me via Email drsebicurecenter@gmail.com For Penis Enlargement Product to help you get as long as 8inches Long with good Erection. Contact Me Via Email : drsebicurecenter@gmail.com Via WhatsApp +2347010538590

    ReplyDelete
  9. I Can’t still believe that i got cured from Genital Herpes through herbal treatment from Dr Oyagu who I met through the internet, I actually couldn’t believe it at first because it sounded impossible to me knowing how far I have gone just to get rid of it. Dr Oyagu send me his medicine which I took as instructed and here I am living a happy life once again, a big thanks to Dr Oyagu, I am sure there are many herbal doctors out there but Dr Oyagu did it for me, contact him oyaguherbalhome@gmail.com , also call or whatsApp him on +2348101755322

    ReplyDelete
  10. HELLO EVERYONE.. FEW MUNINETS TO REDY THIS INFOR ON HERPES CURE 2018..
    2017 MY MOTHER WAS DIAGNOSED OF HERPES/ KNOWN AS GENITAL WARTS ,I SPENT A LOT OF MONEY ON HER MEDICATION TILL A POINT I EVEN LOST HOPE,BECAUSE MY MOTHER WAS GRADUALLY DYING AND LOST HER MEMORY TOO, I WAS SO DESPERATE TO GET MY MOTHER BACK TO NORMAL, ONE DAY MY UNCLE WHO LIVES IN LONDON UNITED KINGDOM TOLD ME ABOUT DR OLIHA ,WHO HELPED HIM GET RID OF HERPES /GENITAL WART WITH HERBAL MEDICINE AND HIS HERBAL SOAP ,I WAS SO SHOCKED WHEN HE TOLD ME ABOUT THIS ,ALTHOUGH I NEVER BELIEVE IN HERB BUT, I KEEP TO BELIEVE BECAUSE MY UNCLE CAN'T TELL ME LIES WHEN IT COMES TO HEALTH CONDITION I CONTACTED DR OLIHA VIA HIS EMAIL; OLIHA.MIRACLEMEDICINE@GMAIL.COM , YOU CAN TALK TO HIM VIA CALL OR WHATSAPP MESSENGER ON +2349038382931 , HE REPLIED AND ASK ME TO SEND MY HOME ADDRESS AND MY MOTHER'S DETAIL AND THEN I PURCHASED THE HERBAL MEDICINE,SENT ME THE HERBAL MEDICINE THROUGH COURIER SERVICE, WHEN I RECEIVED THIS HERBAL MEDICINE USED IT FOR 2 WEEKS, AND 4 DAYS OF USAGE THE WARTS FELL OFF, MY MOTHER I NOW TOTALLY CURED AND MY MOTHER IS LIVING FREE AND HAPPY AGAIN. YOU CAN TALK TO DR VIA HIS MOBILE NUMBER OR WHATS APP HIM ON +2349038382931.ALL THANKS TO DOCTOR DR OLIHA  

    ReplyDelete
  11. I Can't still believe that i got cured from Genital Herpes through herbal treatment from Dr Oyagu who I met through the internet, I actually couldn't believe it at first because it sounded impossible to me knowing how far I have gone just to get rid of it. Dr Oyagu send me his medicine which I took as instructed and here I am living a happy life once again, a big thanks to Dr Oyagu, I am sure there are many herbal doctors out there but Dr Oyagu did it for me, contact him oyaguherbalhome@gmail.com , also call or whatsApp him on +2348101755322

    ReplyDelete
  12. My name is Louis Edmond, I am from USA. I want to share a testimony about Dr Aluya, a great spell caster who is very straight forward with his words of casting spells. When my Wife left me for another Man i was so confused,but one a day a friend of mine gave me the email address of this great spell caster called dr Aluya, I contacted this man and explained to him all that i was going through,he then told me to be calm and not worry anymore because my case is a very easy one. At first I never believed all that he was saying until when my husband returned home two days later begging me to forgive him for all that he had done to me and to please accept him back into my life,I was so amazed,I never believed it was going to happen that fast.
    This man is truly great indeed. Contact him today for a perfect solution to your love problem, aluya.48hoursspelltemple@gmail.com.  or whatsApp him  +2348110493039

    ReplyDelete
  13. i want to recommend Dr Eromosele as the best spell caster from Africa, he is a good and guanine man who love help people, i came across his testimonies online and how he help people bring back their lover, at first i thought he was one of those scammer but i decried to try but to my greatest surprise he didn't have a good job and my love is back and will a living together as one. all this was because of dr eromosele, you can contact him today and get your problem solved you him on whatsapp at +2348075799423 or email him at: dreromosele156@gmeil.com

    ReplyDelete