THE RATIONAL ANIMAL'S END: In search of the "blame Martha Washington" crowd!

THURSDAY, MARCH 5, 2020

Also, in search of the lust for those thighs:
Is it a good idea to introduce sexualized insult into the national discourse?

Basically no, it just isn't. Sexualized insults introduce a very fast track to the bottom. That's especially true of sexualized insults aimed at whole demographic groups.

That doesn't mean you can't state a case, if you actually have one. With that in mind, Alexis Coe makes this claim in her fraudulent but widely-praised best-seller, You Never Forget Your First:
COE (page xxxiii): The father of his country was no father. At least, not biologically. When Washington married the widow Martha Custis, he became the guardian to her two [surviving] children [of four]—a son named Jacky, age four, and a daughter naed Patrsy, age two—whom he appears to have loved and treated as if they were his own...

...[Washington] didn't avoid the subject of childlessness. or wax regretful over it, which suggests it wasn't a source of great tragedy in his life. Yet the Thigh Men are obsessed with it. They spend dozens of pages discussing why it happened and why it doesn't detract from his virility—as if that's a preoccupation everyone shares.
When she refers to "the Thigh Men," Coe is referring to Washington's white male biographers, four of whom she names. She calls them "the Thigh Men," she insultingly says, because "[Washington's] thighs drive them wild" (Coe's italics).

In Coe's book, the insults continue from there. These insults are delivered in the Preface and Introduction to Coe's pseudo-book—and they represent the only part of her pathetic best-seller which is being discussed.

The insults continue from there. There's "something hinky" about the Thigh Men's "repetitive insistence on Washington's conspicuous masculinity," Coe insultingly says. One of these fellows—Pulitzer-winner Ron Chernow—is said to "take every opportunity to remind readers that the great general was very, very manly."

Also, "the Thigh Men are a decidedly 'size matters' crowd!" The sneering insults Coe delivers are just so snarky, so cool!

In the passage we've just posted, Coe maintains that the Thigh Men "spend dozens of pages discussing why [Washington's childlessness] happened and why it doesn't detract from his virility." Sadly, as she continues from there, so does her theme:

She claims that, "after defending Washington [on this score], the Thigh Men usually turn their sights on Martha, blaming her for the couple's childlessness."

So it goes as Coe couples some decidedly odd-sounding claims to a drumbeat of sexualized insult. Basically, Washington's male biographers have just been a hinky bunch of closeted dirty old men.

Having said that, how odd! In her end notes, Coe doesn't tell us where we can see the Thigh Men behave in the manner described regarding Washingon's childlessness. In which of their books can we see them spend "dozens of pages" "defending" Washington and his virility, then "blaming Martha" for the couple's lack of children?

Coe has named four different men, and her insults continue from there. But how odd! She never tells us where we can go to see this scholarly misconduct as it occurs!

Because we aren't modern journalists or cosseted professors, we decided to fact-check this claim, which comes tinged with sexual insult. Since Ron Chernow is the male historian Coe names first and loathes the most, we searched his Pulitzer-winning 2010 biography, Washington: A Life, for passages in which he discusses this topic.

In the case of Chernow, Coe's accusation is strikingly bogus. It isn't that Chernow doesn't discuss the question of childlessness because, like others, he does. But he spends little time on the topic, and this is the way he comes down:
CHERNOW (page 103): The marriage thrived even though Martha and George lacked children. Many theories have been advanced to explain this barren marriage. Martha may have sustained injury during the birth of Patsy, her final child [of four], making additional births impossible. Some scholars have speculated that George's early bout of smallpox or some other disease left him infertile...
As Chernow continues, he says, perhaps a bit credulously, that Washington "didn't think he was sterile," based on something he once wrote in a letter. But you've now seen the "dozens of pages" Chernow devotes to this topic, and you've seen the way he defends Washington's virility while "blaming Martha."

Much later, on page 493, discussing a possible paternity matter, Chernow states his general view of this matter again. "There is also the problem that Washington was likely sterile," he writes, "although the problem with having children may have come from Martha."

On page 593, he refers, once again, to Washington's "apparent sterility." This is how Chernow comes down on this question, to which he devotes little space.

"Washington was likely sterile!" In this way, Chernow devotes dozens of pages to blaming Martha first.

Inevitably, this seems to be the very view on which the ridiculous Coe herself settles. "In all likelihood, Washington was left sterile from an illness in his youth," she writes on page xxxiii, immediately after penning her imagined version of what the Thigh Men have said.

Nowhere does she direct us to a place where even one of history's many Thigh Men has spent dozens of pages defending George and "blaming" Martha on this point. And sure enough!

Along comes Professor Kars in Sunday's Washington Post. She blows directly past this problem—a problem which appears again and again in this disordered book, forming an inexcusable pattern.

Has any historian ever discussed this matter in the way Coe describes? If so, she doesn't tell us where this has occurred—and she slimes three others, along with Chernow, for conduct she doesn't quote and won't direct us to in her notes.

This is ugly, stupid behavior. Possibly for that reason, it's currently being promoted by the New York Times, the Washington Post and by cable stars like Brian Williams, who never met a shifting tribal/corporate narrative he couldn't get behind.

Others have failed to fact-check too. We'll mention some tomorrow.

We still haven't examined a basic question—to what extent do the Thigh Men actually obsess on Washington's thighs? When first we looked into Coe's strange book, this was the first of the strange-sounding claims we decided to fact-check.

In the case of TV's Patty Duke, "a hot dog made her lose control." In the case of these male historians, do Washington's thighs really "drive them wild" (Coe's italics)? We decided to try to find out.

The allegation is so imprecise that there's no literal way to fact-check it. But the claim was larded with sexual insult. Beyond that, it struck us as perhaps a bit unlikely. We decided to search the books of the Thigh Men Coe names, if only to see how often they even mention George Washington's thighs.

How often do the Thigh Men actually mention his thighs? We'll speak in the type of language Coe might be able to process:

Not real f**king often.

Coe names four Thigh Men by name. Three of them get named in the passage about the way they allegedly obsess about Washington's manly thighs. (To peruse that passage, click here.)

One of the three is Joseph Ellis. The book in question is His Excellency: George Washington (2004). According to an electronic search, the word "thigh" or "thighs" appears in the book three times, only twice with reference to Washington.

One of the references concerns a tumor which appeared on Washington's left thigh during his first term as president, seeming to threaten his life. The reference is fleeting and medical.

That leaves the single reference to Washington's thigh which made Ellis a Thigh Man. Below, you see the sentence in question:
ELLIS (page 12): No full physical description exists for the period, but accounts from a few years later allow us to project backward to envision a very tall young man, at least six feet two inches, which made him a head higher than the average male of the time. He had an athlete's body, well proportioned and trim at about 175 pounds, with very strong thighs and legs, which allowed him to grip a horse's flanks tightly and hold his place in the saddle with uncommon ease.
That's the only reference to Washington's thighs in this entire book, except for the later, fleeting reference to the tumor which seemed to threaten his life in 1789. In the fertile imagination of Coe, that single reference was enough to identify Ellis as a Thigh Man.

It also qualified him for the attendant sexualized insults and insinuations—insults and insinuations Kars waves off as "playful" in her review of Coe's book.

Ellis barely mentions Washington's thighs, but the same is true of Chernow—and he is Coe's most-reviled Thigh Man. She mocks him for writing a book of "almost one thousand pages," but fails to note that he barely mentions Washington's thighs in this enormous text.

According to an electronic search, the word "thigh" appears in Chernow's text nine times. Seven of those usages appear late in the book, when Chernow discusses the "fast-growing tumor" on Washington's thigh and the way it was treated. (He also discusses a later reappearance.)

That leaves exactly two (2) non-medical references to Washington's thighs in Chernow's lengthy book..

On page 30, Chernow presents his own description of Washington as a young man. In a passage which also reports that "his body was oddly shaped" and that he "spoke with a weak, breathy voice," Chernow tells readers this:

"He possessed strong but narrow shoulders and wide, flaring hips with muscular thighs that made him a superb horseman."

It's that one sentence, all by itself, which makes Chernow king of the Thigh Men. His only other use of the word occurs on page 106, when we're told, again in passing, that Washington's "wide hips and powerful thighs" created a problem when he had to order clothing, by mail, from his London tailor. (There was no Internet then.)

One relevant sentence in Ellis' book; two in Chernow's massive tome. The third Thigh Man, Richard Brpokhiser, uses the word exactly once in the book Coe cites.

The final Thigh Man, Harlow Giles Unger, never uses the word at all in the book Coe cites in her notes. Like Chernow (see yesterday's report), he does talk about Washington's teeth. In fact, he does so early and often.

This flies in the face of the brilliant insight Professor Kars took away from Coe's book. In her review in the Washington Post, Kars told us, in her own voice, that the Thigh Men ignore Washington's defective teeth but can't get enough of his thighs.

Can a modern nation expect to survive when even its professors behave this way? When professors, behaving like Donald J. Trump, think waves of inaccurate sexualized insult are just a "playful" affect?

Tomorrow: The end of the line

17 comments:

  1. "Is it a good idea to introduce sexualized insult into the national discourse?"

    Into your holy-sacred "national discourse", dear Bob?

    Why, certainly isn't a good idea if we live in Spain in times of the Inquisition. They might burn you alive for that.

    Otherwise, it really depends on the genre you are writing in, dear Bob.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby wants to live in a world where it is OK for men to make sexualized insults but not women.

      What man hasn't called a woman a lesbian because she wouldn't go out with him? What man referred to Rachel Maddow as "stuffing money down her pants" instead of being greedy?

      The things Somerby said about Chanel Miller were as gross as the things Matthews said about Hillary, in my opinion.

      True, Somerby isn't part of the "national discourse" but it isn't for lack of trying.

      What good Catholic boy likes it when girls talk dirty? But Somerby should have outgrown that attitude by now. And, yes, it is sexist because it embodies a double standard.

      Delete
    2. He also said this about Maddow "She isn't telling you about the astonishing costs pf American health care. She isn't discussing the climate crisis, which is on track to kill so many children around the world"

      And it is true that Maddow spent three years wasting everyone's time on Russia which as we all know from reading the Mueller report added up to nothing. During which time she obsequiously lapped up every word ex CIA and ex-FBI agents told her which makes her either gullible or complicit in the DNC/CIA Russiagate propaganda effort.

      So she's not above criticism. There's a lot of contemptuous behavior on the part of that particular broadcaster no matter what is hanging between their legs.

      Delete
    3. Women may be lacking in education and accomplishments, extravagant in tastes, conspicuous in apparel, something more than self-assured in bearing, devoted to trivialities, inclined to frequent malls etc. It is, nevertheless, not without cause that art has always shown the virtues in woman's dress, and that true literature teems with eloquent tributes and ideal pictures of true womanhood—from Homer's Andromache to Scott's Ellen Douglas, and farther. While Shakespeare had no heroes, all his women except Ophelia are heroines, even if Lady Macbeth, Regan, and Goneril are hideously wicked. So it is interesting to see Somerby cast Maddow in the light that he does, reproaching her as if she were an equal to men.

      Delete
    4. Dear dembot, your dembot supervisor will not look kindly on your copy/pasting word-salads directly from the web, y'know.

      Delete
    5. I never believed that i will be happy again after much frustration. I have been rejected by my husband after Six(6) years of marriage just because he met another woman and he left me and the kids to suffer. One day when i was reading through the web i stumbled at a post on how chief dr lucky the great spell caster has helped people to restore broken marriages and relationships and curing of diseases. I emailed him immediately to help my situation via: chiefdrlucky@gmail.com He told me not to worry that my husband will return to me begging and shedding tears of forgiveness. I am so happy that my husband actually returned to me in 48 hours after i obeyed the words and instructions of chief dr lucky. contact him today in any of your problems for a lasting solution:
      If you want your ex lover back.
      If you want to be cured of Herpes, Fibroid Cancers and other diseases.
      You want to be rich and famous.
      You want to be promoted in your office.
      if you want to win the troubling court cases.
      You want your husband/wife to be yours forever.
      if you want to divorce or stop your divorce.
      Pregnancy spell to conceive and bear baby.
      Contact chief dr lucky via: chiefdrlucky@gmail.com or call/whats app +2348132777335 for lasting spell solution to all your problems. His website: http://chiefdrluckysolutionhome.website2.me/  

      Delete
    6. Hello viewers around the Globe, Herbal Penis Enlargement product is 100% guarantee to Enlarge and get a better ERECTION ,the reason why most people are finding it difficult to enlarge Penis is because they believe on medical report, drugs and medical treatment which is not helpful for Penis Enlargement . Natural roots/herbs are the best remedy which can easily Enlarge your Penis permanently Contact Dr Olu via Email : Drolusolutionhome@gmail.com or via Whats App : +2348140654426 for Natural root and herbal remedies put together to help you get Enalarge and Erect healthy. Thank you.  

      Once again God bless you Dr. Olu for what you have done in my life.  

























      Hello viewers around the Globe, Herbal Penis Enlargement product is 100% guarantee to Enlarge and get a better ERECTION ,the reason why most people are finding it difficult to enlarge Penis is because they believe on medical report, drugs and medical treatment which is not helpful for Penis Enlargement . Natural roots/herbs are the best remedy which can easily Enlarge your Penis permanently Contact Dr Olu via Email : Drolusolutionhome@gmail.com or via Whats App : +2348140654426 for Natural root and herbal remedies put together to help you get Enalarge and Erect healthy. Thank you.  

      Once again God bless you Dr. Olu for what you have done in my life.  

      Delete
    7. Good day to all viewer online am so happy sharing this great testimony on how i was checking for solution in the internet then miraculously i came Across Dr.LOSA the powerful herbalist that Cure Numerous individuals Herpes Simplex Virus,so I contacted him base on the testimonies I?m seeing about him on the internet, I was cured too by him, kindly contact him actoday through his email he can help you email ; dr.losaherbalhome@gmail.com and so he can cure types of diseases like,HEPATITIS B,DIABETICS,CANCER,HPV,LOW SPERM CAM HIV/STDS FIBROSIS LOST OF WEIGHT .. all thank to you Dr LOSA for your kindly help in my life his Mobile number +2349056464736

      He cure listed diseases
      CANCER
      HEPATITIS A AND B
      DIABETIC.
      HERPES





















































      Good day to all viewer online am so happy sharing this great testimony on how i was checking for solution in the internet then miraculously i came Across Dr.LOSA the powerful herbalist that Cure Numerous individuals Herpes Simplex Virus,so I contacted him base on the testimonies I?m seeing about him on the internet, I was cured too by him, kindly contact him actoday through his email he can help you email ; dr.losaherbalhome@gmail.com and so he can cure types of diseases like,HEPATITIS B,DIABETICS,CANCER,HPV,LOW SPERM CAM HIV/STDS FIBROSIS LOST OF WEIGHT .. all thank to you Dr LOSA for your kindly help in my life his Mobile number +2349056464736

      He cure listed diseases
      CANCER
      HEPATITIS A AND B
      DIABETIC.
      HERPES

      Delete
  2. The references to "thigh-men" is figurative language, not literal. Swooning over Washington's thighs is proxy for all of the adoring, aggradizing, grandiose claims and language used by male biographers about Washington (coupled with their tendency to ignore or minimize less flattering details about his life). Counting the mentions of "thigh" in the books is ridiculous. If Somerby is serious, he needs to examine whether the biographers show a bias in favor of their subjects, which is a common failing and a no-no among historians. Coe suggests that the bias arises because of male-identification with their subjects, and because of a tendency to shift blame to women and to ignore contributions of women (such as when Ellis considers Washington's older half-brother to be the main formative figure in his youth after his father's death, not his single mother who actually raised him, who is maligned).

    Somerby looked for footnotes about thighs. He didn't mention the footnotes for the other complaints that Coe enumerates. Somerby does tend to leave out anything exculpatory when accusing female writers of crimes of scholarship.

    I was once thrown out of someone's house at a party because I suggested to a physicist that Einstein may have had help from his wife, who was also a top physics student when he married her. I didn't realize the guy was so emotionally involved in the discussion, but I learned from that experience that men do tend to identify with famous figures in their fields, perhaps envisioning themselves as similarly great. When you challenge the "manhood" of such a figure, you are challenging them too, and their defensive is proportionate to their idealization of that figure (who they see themselves in).

    And then there is a sexual overtone. Men don't like it, ever, when women laugh at their sacred idols (which represent their own embodied vision of themselves), whether it is Einstein (for a phsycist) or Washington (for a historical biographer) or Mozart (for a classical musician) or Malala (for Somerby?).

    The surest way to get beaten up or killed by a man, is for a woman to laugh at that man during or immediately after sex. Impugning Washington's thigh's as not as massive as tree-trunks (contributing to his great horsemanship) comes a close second.

    Somerby mainly thinks that women shouldn't make fun of men who write biographies of the sacred father of us all. The sexualization by those biographers (with their massive thighs) and Coe (who writes about dad-history and mocks males for their man-crushes), just adds heat by making it very very personal. It should go without saying that men who are more secure in their own sexuality wouldn't be as upset by such a thing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Professor Kars didn't write a book about Washington. All she did was comment on Coe's work, from the perspective of a professional historian. She liked it and recommended the book.

    If you were going to decide whether to read Coe's book or not, who would you trust? The opinion of a stand-up comedian with a hard-on against female writers and professors, or the opinion of a professor of History whose area of expertise is the time period covered by Coe's review?

    Here is the broader question. Does the opinion of an uninformed man with a bad track record when it comes to discussing women's accomplishments outweigh the opinion of a trained historian with relevant expertise, who happens to be female?

    Somerby thinks we should join him in spitting on Coe. We should also spit on Kars because she consider's Coe's book worth reading, even though Kars is more qualified to make a judgment about the book than Somerby is.

    That is an example of male hubris. Somerby is utterly unqualified to make any judgment about Coe or Kars, except whether he personally wants to read the book, and whether he personally enjoyed it or found it interesting. He has no basis for judging the historical veracity of Coe's book or her criticisms of other biographers. His silly claim that the word thigh doesn't appear frequently enough, or that none of the footnotes (in 40 pages of endnotes) are about thighs, shows his lack of qualification to evaluate the book, not Coe's malfeasance.

    Somerby won't have seen it, but I posted a similar evaluation of Chernow's work from Publisher's Weekly, which shows that Coe isn't the only person to consider Chernow excessively enamored of Washington, to the pointing of exhibiting a crush. This is called bias and historians are supposed to avoid it, as part of their training. Further, the review comes from when Chernow's book was first published, so it is not any example of current PC liberal tribal thinking or feminist excess. It is simply a more competent evaluation than Somerby's.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm starting to wonder if Bob might have a pissed-off ex who likes to post here. Problem is, I can't tell which troll might be the one.

    Leroy

    ReplyDelete
  5. I never believed that i will be happy again after much frustration. I have been rejected by my husband after Six(6) years of marriage just because he met another woman and he left me and the kids to suffer. One day when i was reading through the web i stumbled at a post on how chief dr lucky the great spell caster has helped people to restore broken marriages and relationships and curing of diseases. I emailed him immediately to help my situation via: chiefdrlucky@gmail.com He told me not to worry that my husband will return to me begging and shedding tears of forgiveness. I am so happy that my husband actually returned to me in 48 hours after i obeyed the words and instructions of chief dr lucky. contact him today in any of your problems for a lasting solution:
    If you want your ex lover back.
    If you want to be cured of Herpes, Fibroid Cancers and other diseases.
    You want to be rich and famous.
    You want to be promoted in your office.
    if you want to win the troubling court cases.
    You want your husband/wife to be yours forever.
    if you want to divorce or stop your divorce.
    Pregnancy spell to conceive and bear baby.
    Contact chief dr lucky via: chiefdrlucky@gmail.com or call/whats app +2348132777335 for lasting spell solution to all your problems. His website: http://chiefdrluckysolutionhome.website2.me/  

    ReplyDelete
  6. Did you hear there is a 12 word phrase you can say to your partner... that will trigger deep feelings of love and instinctual attractiveness for you buried within his chest?

    Because deep inside these 12 words is a "secret signal" that triggers a man's instinct to love, cherish and look after you with all his heart...

    12 Words Who Fuel A Man's Desire Response

    This instinct is so built-in to a man's genetics that it will make him work harder than ever before to build your relationship stronger.

    Matter of fact, triggering this all-powerful instinct is absolutely important to having the best ever relationship with your man that the second you send your man one of these "Secret Signals"...

    ...You'll soon find him expose his heart and soul to you in a way he haven't expressed before and he will perceive you as the only woman in the world who has ever truly attracted him.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello, my name is RITA CARMEN and I have been trying to get pregnant for over 12 years. i have been looking for ways online for so long, I first did Depo Provera Shot which i consecutively took every three months in order to get pregnant or fertile, but there was no way from it. I did Depo shot for 3 years constantly until my Doctors in Australia told me to try IVF because I had Endometriosis stage 4 and I resulted to try IVF (In Vitro Fertilization). For months after my IVF no progressed and my situation became worse that my husband had already had plans or getting married to another woman because I was barren. I read a testimony about Prophet Abulele how he had helped so many women with pregnancy problems and also how he usually casts return spells to bring back partner and make one fertile. Of all options tried, I gave Prophet Abulele a try. I am now a mother of a baby boy. For over 13 years of my marriage I received my help from this spell caster. I want to impact on someone's life and make the person get help from a good spell caster. Prophet Abulele's email is:- prophetabulelehealingtemple@gmail.com and his WhatsApp is +2349022406159 once you contact him, he will help you fast.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Good day everyone my name is Catherine I'm from Los Angeles. I'm here to tell you about how I lost my husband to a fellow woman after 5 years of marriage with 1 child. My husband left me for a reason I do not know, I worried and cried because I love him and I couldn't live without him,losing him troubled my mind so I told my dear friend Julia about my problem and she told of this man who helps people in a similar situation. I contacted with the man,after he did his job,I started to receive calls and texts from my husband telling me to forgive. Now I'm happy and fulfilled living with my husband and my child now got the opportunity to live with her father. So if are in a similar situation or facing marital difficulty, you can contact him via(dr.alusistanley@gmail.com). He will give you his WhatsApp number himself.

    ReplyDelete

  9. LOTTO, lottery,jackpot.
    Hello all my viewers, I am very happy for sharing this great testimonies,The best thing that has ever happened in my life is how I win the lottery euro million mega jackpot. I am a Woman who believe that one day I will win the lottery. finally my dreams came through when I email believelovespelltemple@gmail.com and tell him I need the lottery numbers. I have spend so much money on ticket just to make sure I win. But I never know that winning was so easy until the day I meant the spell caster online which so many people has talked about that he is very great in casting lottery spell, . so I decide to give it a try.I contacted this great Dr Believe and he did a spell and he gave me the winning lottery numbers. But believe me when the draws were out I was among winners. I win 30,000 million Dollar. Dr Believe truly you are the best, all thanks to you forever

    ReplyDelete