What does it mean to live in a Babel?

MONDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2023

Here's where the story starts: What does it mean to live in a "Babel?" According to the leading authority on the topic, here's where the well-known locution got its start:

Tower of Babel 

The Tower of Babel narrative in Genesis 11:1–9 is an origin myth and parable meant to explain why the world's peoples speak different languages.

According to the story, a united human race speaking a single language and migrating eastward, comes to the land of Shinar. There they agree to build a city and a tower with its top in the sky. Yahweh, observing their city and tower, confounds their speech so that they can no longer understand each other, and scatters them around the world.

[...]

The story's theme of competition between God and humans appears elsewhere in Genesis, in the story of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.

The story of Babel dates back to Genesis. According to that same leading authority, quite a few other cultures feature "comparable [origin] myths."

The story of Babel is an attempt to explain the existence of the world's many human languages. According to the Genesis text, the creation of this state of affairs was, in effect, a type of punishment, or perhaps a type of restraint, visited upon us grasping humans:

Now the whole earth had one language and the same words. And as they migrated from the east, they came upon a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there. And they said to one another, "Come, let us make bricks and fire them thoroughly." And they had brick for stone and bitumen for mortar. Then they said, "Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves; otherwise we shall be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth." The LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which mortals had built. And the LORD said, "Look, they are one people, and they have all one language, and this is only the beginning of what they will do; nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. Come, let us go down and confuse their language there, so that they will not understand one another's speech." So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city. Therefore it was called Babel, because there the LORD confused (balal) the language of all the earth, and from there the LORD scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth.

According to that passage from Genesis, the deity decided to "confuse [human] language," apparently as a way to make it harder for us humans to work together and thereby get out of line.

At any rate, that's where the specific locution starts. Today, we Americans are living in an obvious type of Babel.

Red tribe members are told about certain events. Blue tribe members hear about other, different events.

Meanwhile, to the extent that red and blue tribes do hear about the same events, they hear vastly different accounts of those events.

It's very, very, very hard for a large modern nation to function this way. In our highly diverse modern nation, the presence of a wide array of identity groups makes it that much harder for us the people to achieve a common understanding of basic facts and events.

All the way back in 2006, Babel was the name of an Oscar-nominated motion picture. The moving finger writes upon the wall:

Babel (film) 

Babel is a 2006 psychological drama film directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu and written by Guillermo Arriaga. The multi-narrative drama features an ensemble cast and portrays interwoven stories taking place in Morocco, Japan, Mexico, and the United States. An international co-production among companies based in the United States, Mexico and France, the film completes Arriaga and Iñárritu's Death Trilogy, following Amores perros (2000) and 21 Grams (2003).

Babel was selected to compete for the Palme d'Or at the 2006 Cannes Film Festival, where González Iñárritu won the Best Director Award. The film was later screened at the Toronto International Film Festival.... Babel received positive reviews and was a financial success, grossing $135 million worldwide. It won the Golden Globe Award for Best Motion Picture–Drama, and received seven Academy Award nominations, including Best Picture, Best Director, and two nominations for Best Supporting Actress... 

The film of that name explored the difficulties involved in attempts to communicate across the cultural lines of a rapidly shrinking global village. The Babel in which we Americans now live is just one part of that larger design.

The so-called "democratization of media" has hardened the lines which define the Babel in which our nation now lives. Given the rise of talk radio, cable news, the internet and social media, each person is now able to hear only the conceptual language he or she is predisposed to hear.

Seldom is heard a discouraging word as we ingest our tribe's preferred factual claims, stories and myths. Can a large modern nation hope to function this way? It seems to us that the answer is no.

We'll continue to explore this rather obvious sociological / cultural problem in the weeks ahead. As far as we know, the deity didn't send us this scourge. In large part, the problems of this American Babel stem from the behavior of many self-interested parties within our nation itself.

(Some of those parties are well-intentioned. Some of those parties are not.)

It's hard to succeed as a very large modern-day Babel. Blue tribe members speak one language, red tribe members another.

Under current arrangements, very seldom is the twain required to meet. It's quite hard for a nation to function this way. 

In our view, this is an existential problem. It should be discussed as same.


30 comments:


  1. Listen, Bob, just try to think about it clearly: how much worse would it be if everyone was listening to exactly the same bullshit, like in Orwell's dystopia.

    You should be happy that some are still getting somewhat different (albeit coming from the same source) narratives. Okay? Alas, probably not for long.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Weirdo Mao, do you really think "Orwell's dystopia" is what Bob has in mind? Of course not. Talk about bullshit.

      Delete
    2. Yes, sweet Corby, that's exactly what, realistically, he has in mind. He wants everyone to be exposed to the same bullshit. And that's exactly the direction where things are going.

      Delete
    3. We don’t know what Somerby has in mind because he doesn’t tell us.

      Delete
  2. Americans’ blasé attitude about Israel’s attack on Gaza is astounding.

    Israel is closing in on having killed 20k innocent civilians in just a few weeks of bombing. Many more have been maimed or otherwise injured.

    Half of those being killed are children.

    Israel has become one of the most monstrous states, daily committing war crimes.

    Yet many Americans say ho hum.

    IT’S A FUCKING DISGRACE.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. American’s blase attitude toward the Hamas attack on Israeli women and children is also a fucking disgrace given that they started it and they broke the ceasefire perpetuating the violence they are complaining about.

      Delete
    2. At the very least, a liberal college president was made to pay for it all. Jesus F Christ.

      Delete
  3. “The film of that name explored the difficulties involved in attempts to communicate across the cultural lines of a rapidly shrinking global village.”

    Here Somerby puts his thumb on the scale.

    Thematically, the film was a bit of a mess, it’s mostly about how interconnected different cultures are, and throws in a childish view of the concept of coincidence.

    Here is how the filmmaker described his movie: “How do four people who have never seen each other in their lives, who are never on the screen together, who are geographically on different sides of the planet affect each other's lives."

    In reality, red vs blue is about the 1% maintaining their dominance.

    Somerby wants a hierarchical world where there’s a higher class of people that rule the rest of us, exploiting a labor class that he thinks are only capable of being worker bees.

    Somerby’s world view is bad for society, is inhumane, and is fascistic.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sometimes Somerby rails against corporate media, good on him.

    Other times Somerby rails against the “democratization of media”.

    Yo, Somerby, pick a side. Your muddled thinking is an embarrassment.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Somerby says the problem is that there are many self interested parties, and that while some of these parties are well intentioned, others are not.

    A self interested party that is yet well intentioned is an interesting concept (being charitable).

    Somerby then struggles to imagine a society where different self interests, even competing self interests, could be viable.

    Somerby’s assessment is as clear as mud; at a minimum, it’s incredibly ignorant.

    ReplyDelete
  6. is the twain —> are the twain

    ReplyDelete
  7. So God prevented people from co-operating. Why is God such a jerk?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because otherwise He would have to take away our freedom of choice.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. Anonymouse 8:33pm, well said.

      And a monolithic society would be tyrannical.

      Delete
    4. 8:33,
      That's also why praying to God for something is nothing but virtue-signaling.

      Delete
    5. Anonymouse 8:25am, in the context of public performance, sho’nuff.

      Delete
    6. Even in private.
      He gave you free will. What more do you want?

      Delete
    7. God just wants to be left the fuck alone.

      Delete
    8. Anonymouse 10:16am, His Spirit.

      Delete
    9. When facing a difficult choice, I always ask myself: what would Joe Biden do?
      And I smell my fingers. I am Corby.

      Delete
  8. Was watching what's happening with the Texas anti-abortion laws and Kate Cox's situation, when I noticed , yet again, the lack of good guys with guns in this country.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The "good guy with a gun" meme, is as phony as calling the anti-women people "pro-life".

      Delete
    2. I am pro-women. I lack good guys with guns.
      I am Corby.

      Delete
    3. "I lack good guys with guns."
      And unicorns, and good-faith arguments from Right-wingers.

      Delete
    4. "I lack good guys with guns."
      And unicorns, and good-faith arguments from Right-wingers.
      I am the USA.

      Delete
    5. Go back to Russia, Boris.
      I am Corby.

      Delete
    6. But we don’t lack anonymices.

      Delete
    7. I am a proud anonymouse. I am not Corby.

      Delete