SATURDAY, AUGUST 2, 2025
Manifest nutcase speaks: By now, the reigning "King of 7 P.M." couldn't seem to hold it in for even a minute longer.
On Friday, July 18, Director Gabbard had accused Barack Obama of engaging in "a treasonous conspiracy" at the end of his second term in the White House.
That evening, Gabbard survived a tough grilling by Sean Hannity as she advanced her claim on his Fox News Channel program. The next day, she survived a gauntlet established by three inquisitors on that day's Fox & Friends Weekend broadcast.
On Sunday, July 20, she took her claims to the Fox Business show, Sunday Morning Futures, where Maria Bartiromo rolled over and died in support of her accusations. And then, on Wednesday, July 23, the Director hit the big time:
Gabbard appeared on the main stage right there at the White House! During that day's White House press briefing, Karoline Leavitt stepped aside and introduced her to the crowd.
As we noted in Monday's report, the Director then performed a thirty-minute briefing in which she continued to advance her claims—the accusations she quickly described as "stunning revelations."
Finally! Finally, the conduct by the traitor Obama had been laid out for all to see! And yet, "the left" kept insisting that the Director's presentations didn't quite seem to make sense.
For the king of 7 p.m., the frustration had apparently reached the point where he could no longer hold it in. As his program started on Thursday, July 24, he proceeded in the normal way—but it was clear that normal procedures, on this one day, just wouldn't be nearly enough.
He started with his normal array of strange, astoundingly dated jokes in which he denigrated a wide array of women, including women in general. In his very first joke, he compared the women of The View to a collection of cows.
(The View is going on summer hiatus, he said. During that time, "the cast will sun themselves in a field while slowly digesting an entire goat," after which "they'll be rounded up by border collies and outfitted with new cowbells.")
As you can see by clicking here, that's what the little guy said! And yet, something seemed to be wrong this night, and the studio audience seemed to have noticed.
That joke was much clumsier, and much more attenuated, than the normal fare in which he compares the women of The View to horses, cows, pigs and dogs, cattle and "livestock" and whales.
The audience laughed a bit tentatively at this clumsy first joke. They didn't cheer the fellow's insult nearly as much as usual.
For the record, the finer people of Blue America—Brooks and Kristof and Maddow and O'Donnell, but also Hayes and Wallace and Ruhle and even Anderson Cooper—have all agreed that we Blues must let such nightly behavior proceed without a word of reporting or comment. To appearances, nobody wants to tussle with Fox, and certainly not with the "fun, smart comedy" produced by one of its strangest "cable news" stars.
The little guy had started the program like that, but something didn't seem to be right. To his credit, he tried to continue his kampf.
Soon, he was telling a wonderful joke about Hillary Clinton—actually, about "women" in general. That pitiful bit of old world throwback went exactly like this:
GUTFELD (7/24/25): Tulsi Gabbard released info that suggests Russia had dirt on Hillary, claiming that she "suffered from fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness."
So basically, she's a woman.
AUDIENCE: [Groaning]
Fo the record, the "info" in question seems to have been a bit of Russkie dis-information. However you choose to score that particular point, the premise of the fellow's joke was so old world than even the people in his studio audience didn't quite seem to be buying.
Quickly, though still in throwback mode, he decided to go with this:
GUTFELD: Today is Amelia Earhart Day, commemorating the life of the woman who vanished while trying to fly around the world.
She was last seen in New Guinea trying to parallel park.
STOOGE TO HIS LEFT: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Women don't know how to parallel park! That's how far back in the annals of old world sexual politics this strange man was willing to go.
(A few weeks back, he even offered a joke based on the premise that Asian Americans are terrible drivers! We recall being amazed to see that premise floating around when we spent a few weeks in San Francisco comedy circles—in the summer of 1985.)
There's really nowhere this fellow won't go as he pursues his strange desire to denigrate women—most often, in his desire to denigrate the amazingly fat, unattractive women who don't agree with his own infallible pseudo-political views.
These inane acts of denigration take place every night, night after night, as his studio audiences cheer and applaud—and as the tribunes of Blue America cower and hide, in fear.
For a year or two, not long ago, we Blues pretended to have a sexual politics, though it was rather plain that we actually didn't (and don't). After a year or so, we Blues gave up that particular ghost:
The Fox News star with the endless collection of grievance parades in these ways every night. As you can see here, his next joke on that unsettled evening was directed at Ellen DeGeneres—more specifically, at the idea that she has unusually oversized ears.
Finally—dare we say mercifully?—he ended his handful of opening jokes with this attempt at a nonpartisan crowd-pleaser:
GUTFELD: Finally, the man who wrote "YMCA" claims the songs is not a gay anthem, as so many people believe.
Right! And "Stairway to Heaven" isn't about anal!
AUDIENCE: [Unsettled murmurs]
GUTFELD: Whatever.
To enjoy that performance, just click here. It was still just 10:02 p.m. Eastern (7:02 on the coast). Mercifully, his "fun, smart" collection of opening jokes had finally come to an end!
For the record, what you've just seen is pretty much all this strange person actually has. That said, something wasn't quite right this evening, and the studio audience seemed to be able to sense it.
Something seemed to be "off" this night. Meanwhile, this was the quartet of stooges who had been hired to support everything Greg Gutfeld would say and do in the course of this midsummer evening:
Gutfeld!: Thursday, July 24, 2025
Joe Germanotta: owner, Joanne's Trattoria
Kennedy: former VJ
Guy Benson: Fox News contributor
Michael Loftus: comedian
Those were the savants the channel had assembled for the apparent purpose of discussing the day's most important news topics.
The women of The View are cows. Also, women in general can't parallel park, and women in general are hopelessly emotional.
It was only 10:02 p.m., but the "cable news" titan had already established those essential points. Now it was time for his monologue—the monologue he delivers each night on one of the day's key issues.
It was Thursday evening, July 24, and on this particular evening, he could no longer hold it in. It was time to speak in support of Director Gabbard. The (60-year-old!) cable star started off like this:
GUTFELD (continuing directly): So once again, the media pretends that their corrupt, shameful behavior never happened. Which means it's time for:
ANNOUNCER: Yiiiikes! Well, nothing to see here!
GUTFELD: They did it with the Covid lab leak, the "fine people" hoax, the Haitian whipping hoax, and of course Joe Biden's brain, where they claimed it was fine when it was missing more screws than a Mexican roller coaster.
Now it's the Russian collusion hoax.
He was tackling the claim of "Russian collusion"—a topic which doesn't seem to be implicated by the claims Gabbard had made.
A screen behind his blared these words:
RUSSIAN COLLUSION HOAX
As the screen announced his topic, the fellow continued as shown:
GUTFELD: So as we unravel the scheme to derail a Trump presidency, the media now wants all of us to move on after gaslighting us like Jerry Nadler with a Bic lighter near his butt hole.
And so, like the dead bird on Maxine Waters' head, we're supposed to ignore it! Right, Jeff?
There followed a very brief bit of tape of CNN's Jeff Zeleny as he started to fact-check Gabbard's press event.
In fairness, we should have warned you! The childish personal insults routinely continue even as the Fox News analytical giant delivers his major daily assessment. So it was as he launched his attempt to review what Director Gabbard had been saying about President Obama's treason.
What followed was one of the dumbest performance ever staged on an American news broadcast. That said, the studio audience cheered along, pleased by his performance at last.
We're going to leave it here for today. We'll continue our act of transcription on Monday.
We didn't want to move ahead and simply ignore those monstrously stupid throwback jokes about half the world's population. For today, we'll simply ask you to ask yourself this:
Women don't know how to drive! Also, women are hopelessly emotional!
The women who appear on The View should be rounded up by border collies and equipped with cowbells! Last night, we were even back to this old favorite:
Something seems to be wrong with Nancy Pelosi's face!
This goes on, night after night and year after year, on one of the most heavily watched TV shows in the American "cable news" firmament. As for the Blue American tribunes you've been told that you can trust, you've never seen even one of those people so much as mention this very strange cable star's name.
Hello stranger, the old song said. By norms which largely survived until the Trump era, most sensible people might have said the same thing when confronted with conduct like this.
For today, we're asking you to ask yourself why the people you've been told you can trust have been willing, year after year, to look away from this aggressive assault on the possibility of maintaining something resembling an American nation. Furious strangers keep coming over the walls, and our Blue stars keep looking away.
Hello stranger, the slightly mysterious old song said. Mysteriously, it soon added this:
You are a stranger, and you're a pal of mine.
Monday: What this manifest nutcase said on the evening in question
Bob is:suffering from GDS
ReplyDeleteSeriously.
DeleteBob needs to get some perspective. The Republican Party is circling the wagons around child rape, and Bob's complaining about the "talent" on Fox News.
Really? You're going with the "You libs can't take a joke" defense?
DeleteQuaker-- I do not question that Gutfeld is disgusting and repulsive. My point was that he isn't that important.
DeleteDavid in Cal-- I do not question that you are disgusting and repulsive. My point is that you aren't that important.
Delete***[JOIN US]***
DeleteHome cash earning job to earns more than $500 per day by working for 3 to 4 hours. Getting paid weekly more than $4.5k or more simply doing easy work online. No special skills required for this job and regular earning from this are just awesome.
GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE ====)> www.join.money63.com
ReplyDeleteIt seems odd, Bob, that you picked an obscure FoxNews comedian as Emmanuel Goldstein for your tribal two-minute-hate ritual.
There's been so many great candidates to choose from: Donald Trump himself of course, members of his cabinet, his friends and family. But you choose Gregory Gutfeld. What gives, Bob?
I applaud the choice and wish others would make it as well.
DeleteObscure?
DeleteHighest rated cable TV host in the land!
Then he must be doin' somethin' right!
Delete1:42 - akin to being the greatest golfer in Gerlach Nevada.
Delete@1:42, I'd be surprised if a quarter of the US population knew who he is.
DeleteThis blog reports on the media. Hope this helps out.
DeleteIf only, Ilya.
DeleteGutfeld is not "the media". He's a comedian.
DeleteHis sins, as I see it, are that
1. he's not a TDS-idiot Trump-hater, so he infuriates TDS-sufferers, and
2. he's infuriates brain-dead PC-idiots (e.g. calling The View cows "cows").
He's not great, but the way he owns the libs isn't too bad, really.
He’s a major bigot. That isn’t owning the libs, it is hate speech.
DeleteGutfeld is funnier, smarter, and more serious than any Right-winger ever.
DeleteI'd vote for him to be President, before the rest of the child rapist's in the Republican party.
Somerby can type as many words as he wants, can repeat the same tired attempt at deflection and distraction all he wants; it is all to no avail - Epstein is here to stay.
ReplyDeletewomp womp
You're a turd.
DeleteWhat is there to deflect from about Epstein?
DeleteTrump has been busily deflecting ever since Bondi said she wouldn't release any Epstein files. The latest deflection is Trump moving nuclear submarines around to menace Russia, threatening WWIII. AKA a diversion, a maneuver designed to draw attention away from Trump's past sexual abuse of minors, as part of a conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein.
DeleteSomerby has yet to mention Epstein here.
Why would you think that Trump sexually abused minors as part of a conspiracy with Epstein?
Delete“Somerby has yet to mention Epstein here.”
DeleteA quick use of Search showed me 10 posts by Somerby mentioning Epstein just in the past month.
Trump said 16 y.o. girls are property to be sold between men. He even mentioned a girl by name, that they both competed over, who recently committed suicide, you sick fuckers.
DeleteDG, how many of those mentions of Epstein were to complain because the press is obsessed with Epstein instead of focusing on other stuff? I would bet all of them. How many deplore the president's connection to Epstein and wonder whether Trump is a sexual predator with underage girls? None of them.
DeleteDG is taking the word "mention" too literally. The point of the commenter was clearly that Somerby should actually discuss the Epstein issue and Trump's culpability as a participant in Epstein's sex trafficking activities. DG must know that, so why is he trying to wiggle Somerby off the hook?
DeleteHere is what Somerby said about Epstein:
Delete"Fellow citizens, please! Everyone has always known that Trump and Epstein had a lengthy friendship. Plenty of photos already existed from their days as friends.
Had KFiles turned up some photos which no one seen before? In fact, the new photos shed exactly zero new light on Epstein's relationship with President Trump. But on CNN, in the hands of Burnett, they were treated as BREAKING NEWS.
The photos were treated as BREAKING NEWS. But all through Burnett's hour-long programs on Monday and Tuesday nights, Tulsi Gabbard was never mentioned. Viewers were never told about the remarkable things she had said."
Somerby is complaining because the Press is talking about Epstein. He mentions Epstein's name to make that complaint. He is complaining because Somerby himself thinks the press should be following Trump's Gabbard distraction instead of talking about Epstein. Somerby says, nothing to see here about Epstein, the press should move on and ignore the Epstein connection to Trump. Old news. Talk about Gabbard. That is Somerby's mention of Epstein.
DG is an idiot, as always.
DeleteThe Corporation for Public Broadcasting announced that it is shutting down after being defunded.
ReplyDeleteYou love to see it.
If you had told me Republican voters would be running around like their team just won the Super Bowl, because Trump and the GOP gave a huge tax break to businesses which hire illegal immigrants, instead of white people, I'd have thought you were crazy.
DeleteYet, here we are.
I for one pity Gutfeld. His mother probably prevented him from having a cookie at one point.
ReplyDeleteHe's lucky his mother didn't drown him in the bathtub.
DeleteLittle guy/big mouth syndrome.
DeleteHe snagged his wife by vandalizing her car, the sick fck.
DeleteGutfeld is riding a gravy train.
Delete
ReplyDelete"And yet, "the left" kept insisting that the Director's presentations didn't quite seem to make sense. "
Co-conspirators refuse to confess, quelle surprise. Give it time, Bob, give it time. Enhanced interrogation techniques never fail.
Yes yes yes. Time. Lots and lots and lots of time. So much time. Like the indictments for the 'stolen' election. They'll be along any day now. Santa's bringing them.
DeleteHe who laughs last, laughs best. Six months have passed, three and a half years to go. We'll see.
DeleteHow can Trump properly prosecute treasonous Obama when the left keeps clamoring for the Epstein files? Thwarted again! Trump just can't get a break.
DeleteJust rehashing the same Russia agitprop that slightly less insane asshole Republicans in the DOJ working on similar smear campaigns during Trump 45 figured, nope, this shit is too dumb rooskie misinfo to prosecute. No there there. But for dirt balls like fucking jagoff weirdo Comey, who relied on Russian spies at Congressional hearings on da Biden's, it's all good. Jaggoffs and weirdos the whole lot of you.
Delete"too dumb rooskie misinfo to prosecute."
DeleteMueller got convictions on all his prosecutions, so what's your point, Boris?
https://youtu.be/DDo4CA13LbY?feature=shared
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/IFwU2qlEttg?feature=shared
"President Trump plans to add a massive $200 million ballroom to the White House."
ReplyDeleteSo, you've got an extra $200 million lying around. You can spend it on peanut paste for starving kids or a new ballroom. Trump went with his gut.
And you, 12:43, could be hauling heavy furniture right now, and then sending the earned money to starving kids. Instead, being the soulless asshole that you are, you prefer spamming blog comment threads with demagogic drivel.
DeleteSoulless asshole? Okay, you've done your research.
DeleteBut 'demagogic drivel'? Points for alliteration sure, but if anything I'm criticizing the demagogue with my drivel. You lack coherence.
Why don't you sell one of you kidneys to feed starving kids? How selfish of you. Yes, demagogic drivel, is exactly what it is.
DeleteDo I understand correctly that unless you sell a kidney and give the proceeds to the needy you lack any standing to criticize the president’s spending choices?
DeleteI would understand objecting to the ballroom if it were funded by government money.
DeleteGo fuck yourself, Dickhead in Cal.
Delete**************
Trump is now “robbing the ground-based nuclear missiles’ safety and modernization budget — for himself,” Maddow said.
Although the plane renovations could take years to complete, Trump has insisted he wants to use the lavish jet as Air Force One during his time in office. After his term, the plane is expected to be transferred to his future presidential library.
“So our aging, leaky, ground-launched nuclear missile system needs some attention, needs a little TLC. ... But Trump is taking the money from that program for himself to instead fix up this plane that he wants,” Maddow said.
She added: “Diverting $934 million in taxpayer funds from the Pentagon for nuclear weapons safety to instead making sure he gets the gold inlay he knows he deserves, on the plane he plans to take with him when he goes.”
Maddow said Trump’s priorities put him in line with other authoritarian leaders, who share an affinity for luxury over governing.
https://www.msnbc.com/top-stories/latest/trump-nuclear-safety-funds-qatari-jet-air-force-one-rcna221725
DiC - Do you think the donors are contributing out of pure patriotism, or do you worry that they may be seeking enhanced “access” or, heaven forbid, even return “favors”?
DeleteI mean, if we need a ballroom in the people’s house, the people should pay for it.
Jesus the fat orange turd has the taste of the fucking sheik of Arabic. His fucking addition is double the size of the current white house. What a ignant douche.
Delete"I would understand objecting to the ballroom if it were funded by government money."
DeleteWhat kind of person goes out of his way to cut $ to feed starving kids then does private fundraising for hundreds of millions of $ to build a ballroom that no one has asked for?
(and lest someone question my moral bona fides, I'm writing this weakened from my recent kidney extraction).
Hector - there's a difference between taxpayer money and donated money. Federal spending must be dramatically cut to save the country from fiscal collapse. You should be urging Trump and Congress to cut spending a lot more than what they're doing.
DeleteIt's usual for Presidents to make changes in the White House or its grounds. Normally they're paid for with taxpayer money. In this case, donors are saving you and me the cost of the ballroom. We should be grateful, not critical.
DG - I agree that donors might be buying influence. Of course, people have so many legal ways to buy influence. E.g., campaign donations, party donations, paying a VP's son millions of dollars for no possible purpose except influence, buying the President's son's paintings, when the son has no reputation as an artist.
"In this case, donors are saving you and me the cost of the ballroom. We should be grateful, not critical."
DeleteDiC,
I characterized the ballroom as a thing "no one asked for." Indeed, this has apparently been an obsession of Trump's for years, which he first pitched unsuccessfully to Obama (link below), who said thanks but no thanks.
The private funding will be yet another opportunity for those with money to curry favor with Trump.
In sum, you tell me to be grateful for what will undoubtedly be a swamp-enhancing, Trumpian glitz bomb of tacky splendor and overdoneness.
I will withhold my gratitude.
https://www.npr.org/2025/07/30/nx-s1-5425497/trump-whitehouse-ballroom
Great news for America!
DeleteTrump's health is deteriorating so rapidly, his doctors say his days of raping pre-teens might be behind him.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThere's another name for donated money, which is much more descriptive: bribes.
DeleteHector -- Do you have evidence that nobody ever asked for a ballroom? It's hard to prove a negative like this one. BTW The White House pointed out that Presidents have had to use a tent for some large functions. A ballroom is not essential, but it will be useful ro current and future Presidents.
DeleteIlya -- Some donations are not bribes. Donated campaign money is not a bribe. Donating money to the country is surely not a bribe.
Why, again, isn;'t Trump taking donations for the James Baldwin and Harriet Tubman statues, he and the people want built in every town plaza?
DeleteI guess Dickhead in Cal thinks he can just ignore the fact that Donald J Chickenshit is stealing about $1billion taxpayer dollars from the Pentagon that was earmarked for nuclear arsenal maintenance. This is why I have repeated explained Dickhead in Cal is not here for good faith honest debate.
DeleteDiC,
DeleteI bow to your pedantic logic.
David in Cal,
DeleteSerious question. Would you vote for a child rapist.like Trump most definitely is, if he wasn't a bigot, too?
I miraculously managed to parallel park during the test for my drivers license. That’s because they allowed kids to practice at the spot after hours. My next attempt was not so successful, but was highly entertaining to a bunch of men sitting on benches outside of a courthouse. There were several incidents that made me quit trying. I think most women are able to parallel park, but proportionately a higher percentage of women can not parallel park. (Just my opinion, but please go ahead and kill yourself over it.)
ReplyDeleteI think at least in the good old days "they" said boys are generally better at spacial relationships than girls, generally is the key word. Pro tip - slide up uncomfortably close to the side of the font car, 6 - 12 inches. As you rear wheel gets to the other cars back bumper backing up, turn the wheel hard. It's all in the set-up.
DeleteYou OK Cecelia?
DeleteAnonymouse 7:09pm, you’re on your own with that.
DeleteIt has been found that the advantage of males in spatial tasks is an artifact of the way such studies were designed, reliant on reaction times. Men do have a speed advantage in reaction time tasks. That translated to a spatial advantage when spatial tasks relied on reaction times as a dependent variable (measurement). There is also a tendency of women to translate a spatial task into verbal info, which takes longer to perform. When women are constrained from doing that (via instructions telling them not to do it), their performance on spatial tasks is the same as men's and the male advantage disappears. That would not happen if men were cognitively better at spatial tasks.
DeleteThose earlier findings were used to keep women out of jobs using spatial abilities (airline pilot) and out of video gaming and toys for boys emphasized spatial abilities whereas those for girls did not, increasing a perceived sex difference.
Jokes about women being poor drivers predate these cognitive studies (both confirming and disconfirming spatial skills). Who gets to drive the car is a power and control issue and men do not like to give up control to women. Today, there are many women who are school and city bus drivers without any increase in the number of accidents.
When someone brings this stuff up, it signals sexism, whether it is Gutfeld or Bill Maher making the stupid jokes at women's expense.
Because immigrants around the country are being snatched off the streets and detained by masked ICE agents without any due process, and because the United States remains committed to aiding Israel’s genocidal grip on Gaza, it isn’t easy to write the words, “Donald Trump was right.” But Barack Obama did use the surveillance state apparatus in an effort to undermine the first Donald Trump administration with the Russiagate fraud.
ReplyDeleteHillary Clinton and Barack Obama did great damage in their effort to undermine Trump and no one should shrink from saying so, regardless of opinions about Trump’s actions in his terms in office.
Delete"Immigrants" are green card holders. They are not being snatched/detained by anybody.
DeleteAnd with Israel, this administration is not doing anything different than any other administration since Nixon.
Poppycock. It is a statement of fact that Don Jr and other in Trump's campaign had reached to a handful of Kremlin-connected apparatchiks. Undermined Trump's presidency? How?
DeleteDid it prevent Trump from:
1. Building the wall?
2. Replacing Obamacare with something great?
3. Fixing the immigrantion.
4. Creating a proper Covid response?
How was Trump hampered?
If you feel like Trump's accomplishments are proof Clinton and then Obama did not work to undermine his presidency?
DeleteTrump's "accomplishments"? Huh? I am not aware of any accomplishments. Again, how was his presidency undermined?
DeleteIt was undermined by accusations that he was colluding with Russia,.
DeleteHe did have an impressive domestic Covid kill rate to hang his hat on.
DeleteHe did an impressive job of blowing up the deficit.
DeleteHis one legislative accomplishment was cutting taxes for the richest among us, i.e. his donor base. Man of the people and poopulist he bee.
DeleteYou can pretty much do anything you want to Republican voters, now,.
DeleteThey are so busy cheering on the rape of children, they don't have the time to fight back.
That’s true, no denying it.
DeleteIt was undermined by accusations that he was colluding with Russia,.
DeleteWe are going in circles here. How, specifically, was it undermined? What does this mean?
What don't you understand? During the 2016 presidential campaign Hillary Clinton initiated a campaign to tie Trump with Russia using ridiculous, cartoonish, McCarthyite rhetoric. She colluded with the press and the FBI as part of a strategy to defeat him in the election. Then, in a worldwide shock, she lost and Barack Obama picked up where Hillary Clinton left off by having the intelligence community embellish or hide their true assessments about the matter so accusations about it, leaked to the press by the intelligence community, would distract and undermine his presidency. Best case was it would end it.
DeleteIt's the whatever it is. The January 5th meeting.
Delete12:47
DeleteEveryone knows the Right-wing, corporate-owned media (AKA the mainstream media) concocted the Russiagate story, so they wouldn't have to report that Trump was elected President due to his bigotry.
Perhaps you confused them with Hillary Clinton, because she was the one who got Trump to squeal, "You're the puppet", during a Presidential debate.
This matter hinges on whether Russia actually meddled in the 2016 election. There is plenty of evidence they did. That makes the right wing attempt to spin this as a hoax pitiful. It is not surprising that Trump's ego won't allow him to admit that he cheated in 2016 and again in 2020 and 2024, never winning fairly but only with the collusion of Russia. In 2024, he was also obviously aided by various billionaire oligarchs who were afraid of Biden's (and later Harris's) promise to tax them at higher rates.
DeleteIlya wanted to ferret out specifically how Clinton undermined Trump, not how the Clinton campaign subsequently spun those efforts.
Delete12:57,
DeleteInterestingly, none of what you say is true. Weird, huh?
It's all documented, sourced, backed up and corroborated. You may be referring to the propaganda campaign that was created to make people think none of it was true. That is still going on to this day so I could see where you would make that mistake.
DeleteYou know, the whole polling data Trump Tower thing.
DeleteThe 'Russia did interfere' thing. Part of the propaganda is to make people think that that means Clinton didn't create a plan to tie Trump to Russia, etc. It was very orchestrated so I could see where you would have difficulty.
DeleteNone of this is new information. It's in the public record. But you won't hear about it from outlets and journalists and history professors that participated Clinton's plan from the very beginning to tie Trump to Russia. They're not going to rat on themselves.
DeleteWhat a load of Tulsi Gabbard 'look!-a squirrel! bullshit.
DeleteGabbard released files that offer more proof that that is exactly what happened. if your first thought is, but "But Manafort gave polling data to Russian spies", I regret to inform you, you are still in the congregation of the propagandized. Definitely nothing to be ashamed of.
DeleteOr the Trump Tower one.
DeleteA plan to make the public aware of an opposing candidate's deficiencies is called a campaign.
DeleteIt can be difficult to discuss Trump as he bullies other nations with tariff threats and U.S. universities and law firms with financial shake downs, and builds concentration camp immigration detention facilities and names them Alligator Alcatraz. It is easy to condemn someone who is so openly racist and vulgar and it can be harder to condemn someone like Barack Obama, who was as smooth as Trump is rough. He is the master of image making and, in this case, can appear to be the victim of Trump when, in fact, Trump was the victim of Obama and the democrats. Actually the democracy which we are told is sacrosanct was victimized by the Russiagate witch hunt. Suppression of dissent was legitimized, lawfare against political opponents was legitimized and so was endless war. The corporate media became even more dependent on the state for access and approval and they still uphold the Russiagate lie at every opportunity.
DeleteHillary Clinton and Barack Obama did great damage in their effort to undermine Trump and no one should shrink from saying so, regardless of opinions about Trump’s actions in his terms in office. The fight against Alligator Alcatraz and all the other violations of human rights must go on. At the same time, the people who harmed the little bit of democracy we have must be exposed. Don’t condemn Trump for exposing Clinton and Obama. Let the chips fall where they may.
Delete"Alligator Alcatraz" is a detention facility; what's "the fight against" it? Do you have nothing better to do? Or, are you suggesting that violators of the immigration law shouldn't be detained but summarily executed on the spot or something?
What's with this endless liberal jerking off; will there ever be the end to it?
"Don’t condemn Trump for exposing Clinton and Obama."
DeleteHow can you be 'exposed' for doing the right thing?
@2:19
DeleteBananas.
Russia did, in fact, attempt to tamper with the 2016 election. I refer you to the five-volume report of the Senate investigation into the matter.
As for your hallucination that Hillary Clinton attempted to cook up a bogus connection between Russia and the Trump campaign, I refer you to the Durham investigation which searched exhaustively for evidence of such a plot and came up empty.
Quaker, you are still in the congregation of the disinformed.
DeleteBy their own accounts, Trump and his family have extensive financial ties to the Russians, Trump implored the Russians publicly to work in favor of his campaign, Trump made no secret of his admiration of Putin, Trump favored Putin's word over his own intelligence agency, Trump described Putin 's decision to invade Ukraine as brilliant and cast Zelensky as responsible for the war, Trump gave Russia favored nation status of zero tariffs, and Trump had phone conversations with Putin during his third presidential campaign, which is illegal. And of course there is the matter of Russia, in fact, meddling to favor Trump in all three elections. But Hillary and Obama did great damage to our democracy. So says 2:19.
DeleteYes, they did. Denying it or not understanding it puts you in the congregation of disinformed. There's no shame in that. Unless you are in the congregation of the disinformers, of course.
Delete
DeleteI don't know about the "our democracy" shit. American politics has always been rather ruthless. For chrisssake, John Kennedy was assassinated with, in all likelihood, active participation of the CIA and his VP. Can't get more damaging that that. Or the story of getting rid of Wallace in 1944.
"Russiagate" apparently started as a coverup, distraction, for the Clinton email scandal, and grew into the monster it has become from there. Nothing super-dramatic, really, normal politics of the American slaveholder's party.
Russiagate started as a way for the corporate-owned Right-wing media (AKA the mainstream media) to use as an excuse for why Trump was elected President, without blaming it on the rampant bigotry of Republican voters.
DeleteIt wasn't even the MSM's first excuse. Remember when the MSM claimed Republican voters were "economically anxious"? That didn't work, because imagining there's a Republican voter who understands economics is a fool's game.
It's going to be partly cloudy here today.
DeleteAt least, that's what Hillary Clinton told the weather service to report.
"It's all documented, sourced, backed up and corroborated."
DeleteYeah, in your butt.
Gutfeld is all about hate. If he weren't, he wouldn't appeal to Republican audiences.
ReplyDeleteSomerby used to chide the left for calling people sexists for pointing out disparaging remarks about women in general. Now he blames the left for Gutfeld's material, claiming the left hasn't complained enough about sexist material.
Once again, he claims the left has no "sexual politics" when the left still supports feminism and human rights for women -- in fact we are the only ones doing so now that Trump is dismantling DEI and threatening anyone who still has a female CEO or leadership or a focus on encouraging women in non-traditional roles.
Meanwhile, it is Somerby who failed to support Harris in the last election, who has said absolutely nothing about Trump's attack on women's rights, and who now ignores the issue of Epstein's targeting of young girls as if they were not female and part of the movement to protect women from predatory male behavior.
Somerby himself is no champion of women ever. Recall his remark that if Chanel Miller didn't want to be raped, she shouldn't have been drinking alcohol at a frat party. Somerby doesn't care about women's rights at all. So, his pretense at criticizing Gutfeld just gives him a chance to repeat Gutfeld's routine for his readers while pretending that Epstein never existed.
I think the reason no one laughed at Gutfeld's joke about women on the View being cows is because it makes no sense that cows would be eating goats while out to pasture. Cows are vegetarians not carnivores. So it just made no sense.
“Somerby himself is no champion of women ever. Recall his remark that if Chanel Miller didn't want to be raped, she shouldn't have been drinking alcohol at a frat party.”
DeleteHe never stated that. That’s a lie.
To my abject horror, I have to agree with Cecelia.
DeleteIIya, so you’ll be right at least once in your life….
DeleteFor some reason this particular Anon likes to repeat and repeat and repeat her slanders of Somerby. I feel for her, however, because I suspect she suffered sexual trauma herself and it clouds her ability to process Somerby’s writings when it touches similar themes.
DeleteWhat's the matter with repeating slanders of Somerby?
DeleteThe day after she lost, a humiliated Clinton instructed her campaign managers to engineer a way to spin her loss, one of the biggest upsets in history. They created the false narrative they would give to the press and the public: Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.
DeleteFirst, Hillary Clinton tried to spin her loss on Trump voters being economically anxious, but that went over like a lead balloon, because everyone knows Trump voters are morons, when it comes to the economy.
DeleteSomerby’s entire focus on defending Brock Turner was about how much Miller had to drink, as if that excused what Turner did.
DeleteTHE AGE OF THE NOVEL: New York Times readers get misled!
DeleteMONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2019
Here is where Somerby discusses Miller's drunkenness as a contributor to Turner's assault on her, which he was convicted of by a jury. Somerby focused on that drunkenness repeatedly in a series of essays. Somerby's contention was that the press disappeared her blood alcohol level, but that reveals Somerby's mistaken belief that there is any amount of alcohol that permits a man to rape a women just because she is incapacitated.
Those of you who think Somerby did not say this need to go back and read what he said before assuming that Cecelia is correct about what Somerby said. Her job here is to clean up after Somerby when he puts his foot into messes like this one.
Hillary Clinton reported the Russian interference before the election, both to the press and to then-president Obama. They declined to make an issue of it because it would seem politically biased and self-serving for Democrats. That doesn't mean Russian interference didn't happen, nor does it make it "spin" when it was finally investigated much later, after Trump was declared winner.
DeleteRecall that everyone assumed Hillary would win anyway.
DeleteHillary Clinton's biggest mistake was getting the mainstream media to make believe they cared about Republican voters pretending to care about her email protocols.
DeleteShe must have learned from her mistake, because she made the mainstream media whitewash Trump's corruption.
"She must have learned from her mistake, because she made the mainstream media whitewash Trump's corruption."
Delete????
9:34,
Deleteit comes from the fever swamps of MAGA.
8:18 - Somerby did not defend Turner. He did not excuse what Turner did. You are just factually wrong about these two assertions.
DeleteWhat Somerby said was that he had a difficult time understanding how Miller’s lack of consent could be established beyond a reasonable doubt when Miller was blackout drunk during the encounter and could not testify whether she had consented or not. Despite this reservation, however, Somerby accepted the jury’s verdict.
But I realize I am whistling into the wind and you’ll repeat these same slanders again and again in the future.
Do you understand the problem with what you said here, DG? And why the jury found the way it did?
DeleteFor one thing, she was passed out. No one can give consent under those circumstances. She was lying on the ground next to a dumpster when Turner found her. Somerby said it was her fault for drinking too much, as if women are fair game in such conditions. He made a big point of saying the media didn’t report on her drinking, as if that were a mitigating circumstance for Turner.
DeleteSomerby does not understand why her drinking was irrelevant to what Turner did. DG wishes to defend Somerby but Somerby is repeating sexist tropes that men use to excuse assault.
I myself get drunk and pass out every Saturday, but no one has raped me so far. Disappointing.
Delete9:49,
DeleteYou must not be a pre-teen, for the Republican Party to give you a pass.
I would say that nothing illustrates the right-left news commentary divide than Guttfled-Stewart comparison. Guttfeld is a "comedian" who comments on news as well. So, is Jon Stewart. Guttfeld is neither funny in the least nor is his commentary accurate or truthful. Stewart, on the other hand, is quite funny and is incredibly accurate and insightful in his reporting.
ReplyDeleteWIth that said, reporting on Guttffeld's inanity is a very low return investment. Mostly no one who takes the news seriously pays attention to what he says; it's probably even the case with conservatives. And whoever takes him seriously is more than likely impervious to the actual facts.
Bartiromo is marginally better; just by a thin margin.
Other than that, I've read plenty of debunking of Gabbard's whacky claims. I mean, she gets kudos for writing a long report, and I am sure that she would get at least a C+ for it in college. However, it contains no useful information.
It's too bad you researched the matter so poorly that you think she wrote a report.
DeleteIt's 200 pages of something.
DeleteShe would have been expelled from college for using A1 for her report; but she would still be welcome in her freaky fcking cult and in Mother Russia, or with other deranged weirdos.
DeleteIlya, it's not that Gutfeld is all that newsworthy on his own account. What deserves more attention is that a major cable "news" channel platforms his hateful stupidity nightly.
DeleteOne is inclined to ask what such an organization's real purpose is. Informing the public doesn't seem a plausible possibility'
Quaker: Just like with all of their programs, they call it entertainment. The purpose of such a program is to feed their viewership little bits of addictive garbage and get them more addicted. Maybe in some distant future, congress will mandate that there be a continuous disclaimer running: "This program is for entertainment only. Nothing that is stated on this program can be considered accurate".
DeleteYes, Ilya. But the question remains: Why do they do that?
Delete"Donald Trump is showing all the signs of suffering from dementia. If this were a neighbor, a parent, or a family friend, you would have no trouble seeing it. We should not turn our heads just because it is the president."
ReplyDelete--Chris Truax, appellate attorney who served as Southern California chair for John McCain’s primary campaign in 2008.
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/5429516-trump-confabulation-dementia-signs
Interesting. It may be that Trump is showing signs of dementia. However, there's another significant factor in Trump's wild "confabulations". Trump has never been taken to task for any of his stories. This lack of accountability and lack of being shamed for spouting nonsense and lies has become Trump's environment. For Trump, there's no such thing as reality or facts that do not comport to his desires.
DeleteToday, a small outlet like The Hill asks the important question right out loud.
DeleteWho will ask next?
Not Somerby. He avoids the word "dementia" like the plague.
DeleteIlya, in psychiatry, the term confabulation refers to creating a memory in response to a question that someone cannot remember the answer to. The more cognitively inact someone is, the more plausible and appropriate their fabricated responses will sound. Trump's responses to questions have become unresponsive, inappropriate and fantastical (not grounded in reality) over time. That suggests dementia as much as his inability to remember stuff does. Also, Trump is a deeply ignorant man but in the past he was able to cover up his ignorance more skillfully than he does now. The fact that he now just walks away from the press or says angry things to them shows that he is no longer coping well in these situations.
Deleteinact = intact, typo
DeleteDon't be silly, @1:58. Our Host asks practically every day.
DeleteNo, he asks what’s wring and suggests he is a crazy sociopath but he never mentions dementia. Compare to his treatment of Biden.
DeleteAnon@2:05 -- Yep, I can see your point.
DeleteThe biggest difference between the Right and the Left, is that the Right are sexually attracted to children.
ReplyDeleteGutfeld is no stranger to us women. We have been encountering their type forever.
ReplyDeleteThis is the conspiracy theory that Somerby is defending Trump from when he complains that Epstein gets too much attention and Gabbard too little in the press:
ReplyDeletehttps://katemanne.substack.com/p/the-actual-conspiracy-theory-surrounding
There is some ugly stuff in Trump's past. It should have prevented him from ever being considered as a presidential candidate, much less elected to any office. It is why Trump was frightened when Stormy Daniels came forward and why he has an army of minions defending him today. Trump is a very bad man. Now he is a very bad old man with dementia. Why on earth is anyone in either party defending him, much less allowing him to damage our nation in the way he has done?
The answer needs to rest in the activities of the raft of bad people who have been installed in positions of govt power under Trump's coattails. A better man, even though a Republican, would never have permitted the criming being done with Trump's blessing. A better man, even a Republican, would not have made Putin boss and done his bidding to destroy America.
We have the means to remove Trump from office because of this Epstein "scandal" and we should use it.
Somerby's defense of Trump is despicable. Somerby says "look over here, Gutfeld! Gutfeld hates women!" but we are not distracted. Trump is a bad person over and above his sexual predation, but the sex crimes can be used to remove him from office. That process needs to start ASAP, before our economy tanks further and our global security is compromised. Epstein is the key.
Read Kate Jackson's testimony. That is the real Trump.
Sorry, that is Katie Johnson (not Jackson):
Deletehttps://web.archive.org/web/20160625140503/https:/jezebel.com/heres-how-that-wild-lawsuit-accusing-trump-of-raping-a-1782447083
"Her story, if we take her word for it, goes like this: for decades, she was silent, after Trump allegedly raped her at the age of thirteen, at the home of Jeffrey Epstein, in 1994. She also alleges that Trump sexually abused her there on three prior occasions. Katie never planned to speak about this publicly until 2016, when Trump was running for president. Katie met a TV producer at a party who offered to tell her story: Norm Lubow, who adopted the pseudonym Al Taylor. He shopped around her video testimony to multiple media outlets, who found—upon vetting him—that he had once been a producer on the Jerry Springer show and that he had an anti-Trump agenda, among other red flags. The story fizzled out and Katie was assumed to be a liar who Lubow had coached or scripted. At the same time, her lawsuit in California was filed incompetently, and her lawsuit in New York (filed by a respectable attorney, who met and video conferenced with Katie) was dropped, after she received threats, including death threats. For the same reason, she cancelled her planned press conference in LA a few days before the presidential election, where she had planned to warn America about the kind of man they were on the verge of electing.
DeleteAgain, that’s all if we take Katie’s word for it. Another possibility, of course, is that Lubow did coach or script Katie’s lengthy video testimony. A few points, however: that testimony is compelling, at least in my view. It was widely dismissed when it surfaced in 2016 partly because what Katie was saying was judged just too incredible when it came to Epstein’s sex trafficking of teen girls. Remember, the full story about his crimes didn’t emerge until late in 2018, thanks to Julie K. Brown’s trenchant and prize-winning reporting in The Miami Herald. We now know that what Katie said about Epstein was not only plausible but completely true. Moreover, Katie wouldn’t be the first woman to mistakenly rely on an unscrupulous huckster in order to tell her story: the same is true, notoriously, of the former sex worker Stormy Daniels. People initially dismissed Daniels’s account because she was represented by the huckster lawyer, Michael Avenatti. But Daniels was clearly telling the truth about Trump’s hiring her in 2006 and then, a decade later, paying her hush money. To cite the fact that her lawyer was shonky was, intentionally or not, dismissing Daniels via guilt by association. Many people may have made the same mistake vis-Ã -vis Katie Johnson. After all, as we’ll consider shortly, numerous women have testified in ways that corroborate her story."
"Somerby's defense of Trump is despicable."
DeleteYour own attempts at rational thought leave a lot to be desired.
That's your opinion.
DeleteSee what I mean? What else could my post have been, other than my opinion? Yet you wasted your time and your readers', by typing that post.
DeleteIt never hurts to remind you and others that you don’t know everything.
DeleteAre you seriously suggesting that Somerby attacks Gutfield to distract us from a decade-old story by some unknown woman who filed but then hurriedly dismissed lawsuits rather than prosecuting them?
DeleteSomerby attacks Gutfeld to avoid discussing Trump’s sex crimes, yes. And so what if he has been doing this stuff for decades?
DeleteTrump was shown to both threaten and buy off women in the trial testimony of Stormy Daniels and others. He was convicted by a jury.
Delete"It never hurts to remind you and others that you don’t know everything."
DeleteBut not everyone is as dumb as you, and needs to be reminded.
"The U.S. Office of Special Counsel has launched an investigation into former Special Counsel Jack Smith for potential violations of the Hatch Act during his criminal inquiries into President Donald Trump, POLITICO confirmed on Saturday."
ReplyDeleteThis is just adorable. It almost sounds like a real, grown-up investigation.
For Smith investigating a fucking autogolpe and theft of stolen classified toiletries, er documents. Clearly a completely fabricated political attack. The nerve of these lousy trumpcocksuckers. And his imbecile supporters of raping children.
DeleteNo one is above the law.
DeleteRelevance?
DeleteAnd Trump's pick to lead the special counsel's office? A 30-year-old wingnut who passed the bar a year ago.
Delete3:04 The USSC literally just ruled Trump orangutans is above the ducking law. Pay attention!!!
DeleteHere is the truth about the media, expressed in a more entertaining way than Somerby has ever managed:
ReplyDelete"at the end of the day, the worthless scribblers of our corporate-controlled press are a bunch of gutless fucking cowards. they’re gutless cowards at the beginning of the day, too, and every second in between.
you can’t tell me that reporters who deal with Donny on a daily basis don’t know they’re watching a deteriorating old shitforbrains in advanced cognitive decline. how can they not, after listening to him repeatedly prattle on about whatever fever-swamp nonsense is pinballing inside his big dumb pumpkin head, day after day?
of course they know. it’s got to be an open secret that the Emperor has no brain. but they can’t say shit about Donny’s mind having gone fuckity-bye, because their livelihoods depend on pretending that America’s Mad King is perfectly normal. so they dance around Donny’s crazypants incoherence, and sanewash it as best they can."
Jeff Tiedrich
Jeff Tiedrich, who has never dealt with Trump, claims to know more about Trump's cognition than the Reporters who deal with Trump on a daily basis. Color me unpersuaded.
DeleteThat was totally not your outlook when the subject was Biden.
DeleteQuaker— That was different. The reporters very well knew about Biden’s declining mentality; they were all lying.
DeleteI'm rubber and your glue. The convicted felon, autogolper breaks shit; and Biden worked for good in red states too. Biden got ten things done for good for every two things this nitwit accomplishes for evil. But nobody wrecks the economy or makes more temporary tariff announcements than the Orange TACO King, emperor of child rape. I mean besides shitting on the economy, alienating allies, and gifting his donor base trillions to steal from the poor and our children, what the fuck this weirdo do?
Delete6:11 Since his inauguration, Donald J. Trump has personally ended 5 wars, according to the unbiased presidential historian, Donald J. Trump. Whenever excrement like that comes out of the Orange Jesus's pie hole it is against the rules followed religiously by DiC and his ilk to question the mentation of their idol.
DeleteWhether Biden's "mentality" is anything more than just slowing down at an advanced age is not at all established. From what we can observe, Trump's decline is more obvious.
DeleteYou seem to be plodding along, David, fully confident that Biden is senile. You can't quite tell the difference between lies and things that are murky. That's you being confused.
"That was different. The reporters very well knew about Biden’s declining mentality; they were all lying."
DeleteAnd there we have it.
DeleteAnyone who watched a Donald Trump's presser vs. a horror-show of zombie-like Dementia Joe knows that you TDS-victims are insane, dumb as bricks.
The only question is, why do you keep making fools of yourselves? Have you completely lost all sense of reality? How did it happen? Is it the "boosters"?
The measure of a president is not the entertainment value of his pressers.
DeleteDavid in Cal,
DeleteWhen, do you think, Trump will do something about the nation's epidemic of post-birth abortions?
Trump is a lying punk. He hasn't arrested a single Haitian for eating our cats and dogs. False promises.
DeleteHamas forces starving hostage to dig his own grave. Hamas releasing the video makes it even worse.. Hamas wants the world to know about their barbaric cruelty.
ReplyDeletehttps://x.com/ScottJenningsKY/status/1951986630010491104
Where's the condemnation from the world?
Eat a bag of dicks fascist David.
DeleteAt one time fascists were people who mistreated Jews. Now people who object to the mistreatment of Jews are called “fascists”
DeleteBrilliant, and who would know better than a fascist lay Jew like youself? Do you dream about Herr Miller, your idol?
DeleteI cannot speak for the world, but let me with my one voice say that I condemn Hamas. Not as much as I condemn Israel for their decades of apartheid, west bank Zionist settlers killing Palestinian farmers and stealing their property, and ongoing genocide of Palestinians in Gaza, aptly named the largest open air prison in the world. But yeah, I condemn Hamas. They are barbaric. No less than IDF snipers picking off teens at food distribution sites. But not a peep out of DiC about that. Always wanting to play the victim. Insufferable.
DeleteTo convincingly condemn Hamas you need to spend some time (preferably a lifetime, preferable in several generations) in the situation, under the conditions, people who join Hamas exist.
DeleteOtherwise, your condemnation is nothing but virtue signaling.
Weird. It's almost like the meaning of "fascist" doesn't depend on whether or not you're Jewish.
DeleteLabeling your lot as "the chosen people" gives license to certain indiscretions, shall we say.
DeleteLeave David in Cal alone.
DeleteHe was the one who taught me that genocide of entire populations is a bedrock tenet of the Jewish faith.
Trump says: "Trump wrote. “He’s a Low IQ individual, has no idea what words are coming out of his mouth, and knows nothing about me or what I have done "
ReplyDeleteLow IQ individual is Trump-speak for "black".
You're a low IQ individual, 2:28.
DeleteThat's dark humor 3:07.
DeleteIn a match of wits with a "low IQ" blogger, I am putting all my money on the blogger. Watching this escalate will be fun, as the sinking economy provides the blogger with more commentary that will be irrefutable.
Delete"Low IQ individual" is my-speak for "dark", 6:15.
DeleteRussia, if you're listening, find the Republican voter who isn't a bigot.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your attention to this matter.