THE SQUALOR(S): Squalor Red and Squalor Blue!

MONDAY, DECEMBER 29, 2025

Our nation's dueling squalors: Jeffrey Epstein died in prison, right there in New York City. He was found dead in his prison cell on Saturday, August 10, 2019.

Given the squalor of the time, what happened next was inevitable. In fact, it happened before the day was through. Inevitably, this is what came next:

The sitting president, Donald J. Trump, "used his Twitter account to spread a baseless conspiracy theory" about Epstein's death. Or at least, so said the Washington Post in an August 11 news report.

Instantly, the sitting president had chosen to spread a baseless "conspiracy theory!" According to that poisonous "theory," former president Clinton had somehow caused, or had somehow been involved in, Jeffrey Epstein's death.

Inevitably, that's what the sitting president had decided to suggest. That was the squalid behavior he instantly chose to engage in.

As usual, President Trump was drenched in moral and intellectual squalor as he performed this familiar task. As usual, one of his aides slithered out, working to justify his morally squalid behavior, even as she worked to spread another claim about former president Clinton, a claim which was plainly false.

In the passage we've posted above, we've quoted from that August 11 news report in the Washington Post. Headline included, here's the start of that report:

Trump retweets conspiracy theory tying the Clintons to Epstein’s death

President Trump used his Twitter account Saturday to spread a baseless conspiracy theory about the death of Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy and politically connected financier who had been facing multiple charges of sex trafficking involving underage girls.

Trump’s Justice Department announced that Epstein, who was being held in a federal corrections facility, died by “apparent suicide.”

But Trump appeared to disregard his administration’s statement, instead retweeting a message from conservative actor and comedian Terrence K. Williams, who suggested that Epstein’s death might be tied to former president Bill Clinton...

The claim is completely unsubstantiated, and federal officials say Epstein was not on suicide watch at the time of his death.

So began the Post's report about the sitting president's conduct. Later, the report described what Kellyanne Fitzpatrick had said about the president's conduct in an appearance on the Fox News Channel.

For the record, the headline in the Post report refers to "the Clintons" (plural), a reference which went unexplained in the body of the report. Perhaps for sound journalistic reasons, the Post's report never quoted the baseless claim the president chose to retweet. 

In its own new report, the New York Times was perhaps a bit less circumspect. Headline included, the August 11 report in the Times started off like this:

Trump Shares Unfounded Fringe Theory About Epstein and Clintons

President Trump used Twitter on Saturday to promote unfounded conspiracy theories about how Jeffrey Epstein, the financier accused of sex trafficking, died in a federal jail, even as the administration faced questions about why Mr. Epstein had not been more closely monitored.

For years Mr. Trump has brashly—and baselessly—promoted suspicion as fact and peddled secret plots by powerful interests as a way to broadcast his own version of reality. Those include the lie that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and that millions of votes were illegally cast for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

Hours after Mr. Epstein was found to have hanged himself in his Manhattan jail cell, Mr. Trump retweeted a post from the comedian Terrence Williams linking the Clintons to the death. Mr. Epstein “had information on Bill Clinton & now he’s dead,” wrote Mr. Williams, a Trump supporter. In an accompanying two-minute video, Mr. Williams noted that “for some odd reason, people that have information on the Clintons end up dead.”

There is no evidence to substantiate the claim, which derives from groundless speculation on the far right, dating to Mr. Clinton’s early days as president, that multiple deaths can be traced to the Clintons and explained by their supposed efforts to cover up wrongdoing.

So began the New York Times' report. In short: a flyweight comedian / blogger had offered a baseless (and poisonous) speculation about Epstein's death. The sitting president, Donald J. Trump, had rushed to move the morally / intellectually squalid messaging along.

Now for a bit of perspective:

As the New York Times' report correctly noted, President Trump had been engaged in this sort of conduct "for years" as of August 2019. His repeated baseless claims about President Obama's birth had begun in 2011. Through repeated appearances on the Fox News Channel over the course of four or five years, those absurdly disingenuous claims had been peddled to Red America over that period.

Now it was 2019,  and the president was peddling this claim. Soon thereafter, he was asked to explain or justify what he had done. On August 13, Politico reported what he said:

Trump defends sharing Clinton-Epstein conspiracy theory

President Donald Trump on Tuesday defended his decision to share a tweet suggesting Bill and Hillary Clinton were involved in financier Jeffrey Epstein’s suicide, and stoked speculation about the former president’s relationship with the deceased convicted sex offender.

“The retweet—which is what it was, just a retweet—was from somebody that’s a very respected conservative pundit, so I think that was fine,” Trump told reporters, referring to a conspiratorial message by comedian and commentator Terrence K. Williams, which he re-posted Saturday.

Trump, who has been criticized for promulgating the unfounded theory that the Clintons had a hand in Epstein’s death, said on Tuesday that he had “no idea” whether they played a role in the high-profile prisoner’s demise, and accused former President Bill Clinton of lying about the extent of his air travel on Epstein’s planes.

It was just a retweet, the president said. What could be wrong with that?

He said that he had "no idea" if the insinuation in question was accurate! He had simply decided to retweet the flyweight comedian's poisonous tweet:

So what was the big freaking deal?

As noted, this squalid behavior by this president occurred in August 2019. The final part of the excerpt from the Times report explains why we're discussing it today.

Even then, the Times reported, the sitting president had been "accusing former President Bill Clinton of lying about the extent of his air travel on Epstein’s planes." In the endless hurly-burly which passes for the American discourse, this squalid behavior by President Trump re-emerged with a vengeance this past summer, but then again in the past few weeks.

The moral squalor of this president's conduct would seem to speak for itself. For the purposes of this week's reports, we'll refer to that as Squalor Red.

Unfortunately, Squalor Red has been enabled by Squalor Blue over a period of at least fifteen years. Sadly, the New York Times is deeply committed to that second type of squalid behavior.

A nation is sinking beneath the seas of these dueling acts of squalor. President Trump in deeply sunk in Squalor Redbut what the heck is Squalor Blue, and will it ever end?

Tomorrow: The ubiquity of the whale

Important fuller disclosure: Neither one of these Squalors is ever going to change. This week's reports are being offered for informational purposes only.


42 comments:


  1. "So what was the big freaking deal?"

    Indeed; I completely agree. The Clintons have been implicated in so many murders, that one more shouldn't attract all this attention.

    More to the point, why do you, BlueAnons, care what the President tweets or retweets at all? Are you watching your own BlueAnon politicians' social media activities with the same zealotry?

    Or is all this just another manifestation of your unfortunate TDS condition? I strongly suspect that's exactly what it is...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. U a deranged cult freak idjit. Sad.

      Delete
    2. "Are you watching your own BlueAnon politicians' social media activities with the same zealotry?"

      No, cause our politicians aren't batshit crazy.

      Not such a tough question.

      Delete
    3. "The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal is dismissing a conspiracy theory about 2020 election integrity in Georgia that has gained more traction among Republicans in recent days."

      Wow, the 'everyone' that knows the 2020 election was stolen keeps getting smaller and smaller. Soon 'everyone' will mean 'no one'.

      Except for trumptard, because in his mind he is everyone.

      Delete
    4. The irony that per Trunk the election was stolen while he was President, but the elections were fine when Obama & Biden were President - is lost on his idiotic deranged dumbass cult.

      Delete
  2. The Republican Party is the party of White Supremacy, Corporate Supremacy, and now we know they are all either sexual predators or defenders of sexual predators.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Squalor red is justified by squalor blue, Somerby says. But he doesn't explain what squalor blue is. But the New York Times is to blame for squalor blue, even though it is not a blue media source. Again, no evidence of the blueness of the NY Times is presented. We on the left who read the NY Times do not consider it blue or part of Blue America or a blue media source. The Times has consistently attacked Democratic candidates and promoted Trump and drifts more to the right with each passing day. But more to the point, Somerby cannot assert that the NY Times is blue and that justifies red squalor without some argument, some facts supporting his case. Otherwise it is just an attack on we blues. But what else is new?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The purpose of today's Somerby essay is to promote the idea that Bill Clinton had something to do with Epstein's death, because Clinton rode on Epstein's plane 20 times and was embroiled in Epstein's activities. If this were not the case, Somerby might have spent a few sentences describing Clinton's response to Trump's attacks on him. It has been to tell Trump to release the entire unredacted Epstein files, including any and all places where his name is mentioned. Somerby might also have pointed out that attacking Clinton by calling him a murderer goes way back to his first term in office as president. This is the right's go-to attack on the Clintons. And if the right believed it then, it will now believe that Clinton would have Epstein murdered to protect his own complicity.

    But remember that every right wing accusation is a confession. This is the surest evidence we can have, that Trump had Epstein killed to protect himself and his friends.

    Yes, Somerby implies that Trump's retweet is specious, but why does he not report Clinton's side of the matter, what Clinton said about the Epstein files? That is Somerby squalor and it is always how he operates here. He quotes some right wing atrocity, then ignores the lefty response to it while saying that the left is as bad as the right (bothsides dontcha know). That leaves the right wing view fully fleshed out without rebuttal by the left, while Somerby says he is being even-handed because we on the left are just as bad. Unfortunately, that is untrue. There is no left wing equivalent to Epstein's sex ring. The left has not been trying to hide Epstein's facts and keep the files buried. The left is not protecting Clinton or anyone else. And it is both malicious and advances the right wing talking points to write what Somerby did today, in the way he has done it.

    MTG said that she hasn't spoken to Trump since he yelled at her to stop supporting the Epstein victims, because it would hurt his friends to release the files. She has broken with Trump because she realizes how she has been treated and that he is implicated. That takes courage because she had to resign her office to prevent retribution for her break. By going public, as she is currently doing, she is protecting herself from a vindictive man who is guilty as hell. That is how we know the Epstein files are not about Clinton but about the president. In contrast, Somerby advancing of today's right wing talking point is rancid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said. MTG likely was tipped off to Trump being named in the Epstein files, saw how other women were being threatened when they dared to speak out about Trump's crimes, so she rerouted her career and ambitions accordingly.

      Delete
    2. Grifter Trump shut down MTG's Senate bid, so grifter MTG shut down kissing his orange ass.

      Delete
  5. We have learned some interesting things in the past few weeks from this blog:

    -Emily Compagno, who earlier this year was embroiled in a controversy at Fox News with leaked material pointing to a toxic work environment, heavily embellished her CV (“Emily Compagno’s situation is the latest in a pattern of dysfunction,” said media analyst Grace Laramie)

    -the MN fraud case was masterminded by a White Christian woman, who was caught by the Walz admin and then prosecuted by the Biden admin

    -psychological conditions like ASPD, while possibly having some correlation to heritability, are not bred in the bone; Mary Trump points out that Donald Trump likely turned out the way he is, not from genes, but from having an abusive father - his father endorsed both the KKK and the Nazi German American Bund - as part of a cycle of generational abuse

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. slight correction: it isn't that Trump turned out the way he is from his abusive father and not genes, but from a combination of genes and that abusive father together. It takes more than an abusive father. An absence of protective other adults in his life, the lack of coping skills, and a combination of unfortunate circumstances are needed (such as the model of his older brother becoming alcoholic when stigmatized by the father and not wishing to be similarly treated). Trump identified with his father whereas his brother did not.

      Personally, I do not believe that Trump is a non-drinker. I do believe that his family had no effective way of constraining his bad behavior, given that he learned from his father that nothing he did would be punished. I believe he also has a learning disability that was never addressed in childhood, leaving him unable to learn but also with a lack of desire to learn anything not directly related to himself and his goals. This left him both paranoid and susceptible to others who steer him toward their own interests, from Epstein to the mob to Russians. His abuse of women didn't come from his father, but his racism obviously did. I am interested in his lack of sense of humor and inability to find pleasure in anything, his lack of closeness with his family (wife and children) and his lack of interest in anything not related to himself. That doesn't come from his father's abuse but from personality disorders you say are not bred in the bone, yet have been with him throughout his life. Trump's father is a handy scapegoat but Trump's mistreatment as a child is not the whole story.

      Delete
    2. If this bred in the bone, his father was a bad guy theory gains traction, it will be impossible to convict him of crimes that were freely chosen and committed for his own gain, not because he couldn't help himself. This is why I object to Somerby's constant attempts to excuse Trump by calling him mentally ill. Trump has the same free will as anyone but chose to become a criminal and a traitor to our nation. That's on him, not his daddy.

      Delete
    3. I love how Trump always refers to his 3rd son as Melanoma's kid. Disgusting pos.

      Delete
    4. Fair enough. Your rejection of genetic determinism and emphasis on developmental context, aligns with my understanding; however, the genetic research can only establish correlations, not causation, and it is riddled with selection and reporting biases.

      Furthermore, rejecting free will does not collapse the justice system. We already incapacitate, deter, and quarantine dangerous behavior without appealing to metaphysical choice. Modern criminal law already operates on this distinction (mens rea, competency, mitigation vs innocence).

      If we insist on preserving the fiction of freely chosen evil in order to justify punishment, we ensure that we never address root causes, and that guarantees repetition rather than prevention.

      Delete
    5. Determinism (primarily environmental), as opposed to free will, does not imply innocence, it implies that punishment should be justified by prevention and safety, not by metaphysical blame.

      Delete
  6. "For years, violence intervention was the work of loosely organized, underfunded groups. Then gun violence spiked during the covid pandemic and the Biden administration and Congress poured in money to better integrate such programs within cities. It appeared to help: In Baltimore and beyond, gun violence has plummeted.

    The number of homicides in the city dropped 41%, from more than 300 a year in 2021 to 201 in 2024, according to the U.S. attorney’s office in Maryland.

    “Gun violence is a sticky, hard problem to solve,” said Daniel Webster, a researcher at the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions in Baltimore. “We’re getting it right finally.”

    Now President Donald Trump’s administration has gutted funding for that work." [Daily Kos]

    Instead of promoting Trump's talking points, Somerby might notice that this particular funding cut affects him in Baltimore and understand that Trump doesn't care about murders when he sends in troops to American cities. This is about controlling demonstrators and resistance via a show of power. If Trump care about murders in Baltimore, he would have continued funding this effective program that reduced shootings by 40%.

    Elsewhere in the news, there is the report of a shooting in Washington DC. The family of the person killed is bewildered because Trump is saying there are zero murders in DC after he stationed the troops there. That is obviously untrue, just as it is a lie when Trump says there are zero border crossings since he closed the border.

    I suspect that I will wait a very long time before Somerby complains about Trump's attempt to place troops in Baltimore to control murders there. And I'll wait even longer before Somerby praises programs that are decreasing murders. Because, ultimately, it isn't about the murders in blue cities, is it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They were 5 homicides in D.C. over the past weekend. King Orange Chickenshit was playing War in the Caribbean

      Delete
    2. The result of the National Guard in DC on violent crimes is that the rate went slightly up since a low in March.

      The rate had been trending down for the past few years, much of that is attributable to the Mayor (D) instituting new policing strategies.

      But typical of Republicans, Trump avoids all blame and takes credit for other people's work.

      Delete
  7. Trump's play at the time, externalizing blame to Clinton, seemed like a smart move; however, increasingly the public is aware that Trump was involved with Epstein's crimes and possibly had him murdered to keep him from testifying.

    This, and the economy tanking, is why Trump's polls are in the toilet.

    This is primarily due to the democratization of media, since corporate media will happily sane-wash Republican misdeeds in order to keep their elite positions in society.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Now for a bit of perspective: ...."

    LOL. Good one, Bob.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Somerby’s media whataboutist posts are comically pathetic at this point. Substanceless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree. This is now Somerby's brand.

      Delete
  10. You Know He's Lying Because His Lips are Moving

    "Mr. Trump, who had been calling for the Kennedy center to be renamed for months, expressed surprise that his handpicked board had moved to change the name. “I was surprised by it,” he told reporters."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hideously, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt congratulated Trump — and Kennedy — on the change.

      Yes, King Orange Chickenshit's press secretary congratulated President J. F. Kennedy - war hero - , assassinated in 1963, for teaming up with King Orange Chickenshit. What kind of fucking grotesque country are we living in?

      Delete
    2. Answer- we get to live in the best country in the world, baby. We is blessed!

      Delete
    3. 1:41. If that's not sarcasm it's sad.

      Delete
    4. @2:38 - Please provide a list of all the better countries to live in. Thx

      Delete
    5. Every country that is not being run by a fascist megalomaniac grifting motherfucking bullshitter, Dickhead. Go take a flying fuck, troll boy./

      Delete
    6. Canada and Greenland you dumb wretch.

      Delete
    7. Hideously, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's baby will have an 80 y.o. dad (if he's still alive) when they are in High School. Why are all these deranged Thrump cultists so weird?

      Delete
    8. Please provide a list of all the better countries to live in. Thx.

      Any country whose president doesn't lie like an automaton. Glad I could help.

      Delete
    9. Any country whose President doesn't lie? So, you agree that no other country is a better place to live? :)

      Delete
    10. Anonymices, I’m absolutely sure that Somalians agree with me.

      Delete
    11. I think any govt that exists to serve the people is better. My list includes Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Iceland, New Zealand, Ireland.

      Delete
    12. 3:57. Why don't you look up what country's residents poll as most happy? Or wallow in your jingoistic ignorance.

      Delete
    13. Somalia's President is black, so we know that's at least one country that isn't a shit hole.

      Delete
    14. Somalia's President doesn't even rape children or triple the national deficit in a year, while being cheered-on by the Right-wing.
      How great of a country could it possibly be?

      Delete
    15. Wake me when Somalia's President self identifies as sexual predator.

      Delete
    16. If Somalia was better than the USA, Putin would be blackmailing their President, instead of the President of the United States.

      Delete