SATURDAY: Mary Trump joins David Brooks!

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2026

The history of the era: History is moving quickly today, as you already know. We wish this was a more appropriate time for this morning's task, but if we might borrow from Donald Rumsfeld:

You report the intellectual history of your era within the time frame you have:

In last Saturday morning's report, we reported what David Brooks said.  Had we always known that David Brooks would be the one to break the rule about medical language? 

Possibly yes and possibly nobut right there on the previous night's PBS NewsHour, this was what he had said:

GEOFF BENNETT (2/20/26): Is there a point at which the president's rhetoric—maybe we're already there—becomes corrosive to the institution itself?

BROOKS: Well, Donald Trump has never had an honest disagreement with somebody. And where you say, "Oh, I disagree with you," and without him going ad hominem.

And that is just his nature. It is the nature of somebody with a narcissistic personality disorder to think, "I am the center, and everything that's an assault on me cannot be anything but a shameful attack on all that is right and good." 

Is the sitting president afflicted with the medical condition known as "narcissistic personality disorder?" Might that be a reasonable clinical diagnosis? 

We can't answer that question, but Brooks, a major mainstream journalist, was advancing that assessment. By using that technical medical language, he was also breaking every rule in the journalistic book.

At long last, Brooks had decided to abandon a basic rule of the guildand dear God! This past Thursday night, Mary Trump, the president's niece, broke that same rule during an interview on CNN. 

Mary Trump joined David Brooks! When she spoke with CNN's Erin Burnett, this exchange occurred:

BURNETT (2/26/26): A number of polls are now showing that Americans are increasingly questioning [the president's\ mental state. ... 

We're talking about a possible war about to happen, right? So, people are thinking about it. 

Reuters/Ipsos has a poll saying 61 percent of Americans agree that Trump has become erratic with age61 percent. Thirty percent of Republicans agreed with that. ABC/Washington Post/Ipsos poll last week had 56 percent saying Trump doesn't have the mental sharpness to serve effectively. That's up thirteen points since May 2023.

I mean, that's an incredible jump. ...You've known him your whole life. Do you actually see a decline?

M. TRUMP: I do, but I think it's important to remember that Donald has never been fit in any capacity. Obviously, what we're dealing with now are age-related cognitive declines. We're dealing with physical issues that the White House tries to cover over.

But this is somebody who for decades now has had serious, undiagnosed and untreated psychiatric disorders, which are only going to worsen, especially given the pressure he's under and given the cognitive and physical declines. So it's great that the majority of the American people are starting to wake up to this. But I have to say, it's a long time coming.

BURNETT: All right. Well, Mary, I appreciate you, and it's good to see you again. 

The fact that she said it doesn't mean that it's right. But that's what Mary Trump said, right there on CNN.

For ourselves, we never use the word "psychiatric." We use the word "medical" instead. Here's why:

Psychiatry is a (conceptually complex) branch of modern medical science. The leading authority on the topic puts it like this: "Psychiatry is the medical specialty devoted to the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of deleterious mental conditions. These include matters related to cognition, perceptions, mood, emotion, and behavior."

The (accurate) term which Mary Trump chose to use tends to shut down further discussion. The kinder/gentler term "medical" doesn't have that same effect. 

That said, it had been a long time since we saw Mary Trump, on cable TV, following the trail she blazed in her 2020 best-selling family memoir, Too Much and Never Enough

Mary Trump holds a Ph.D. in clinical psychology. She's an experienced clinical therapist. 

That doesn't mean that her assessments concerning her uncle just have to be correct. But in that best-selling book, she had offered far-reaching diagnostic assessments of her uncleassessments we have reposted many times

Specifically, she had said he met every criterion for a clinical diagnosis of narcissistic personality disorder. She said he also seemed to meet the criteria for antisocial personality disorder, "which in its most severe form is generally considered sociopathy." 

As she continued, she seemed to say that her uncle was likely afflicted by quite a few other "pathologies." 

The fact that she said it didn't make it correctbut the American press corps has long observed a rule which forbids such medical assessments with respect to political figures. After Mary Trump's book appeared, cable news host avoided discussing those diagnostic assessments in her many cable interviews. 

This past Thursday, those technical assessments were back! Burnett didn't seem to be surprised by what her guest said, and she didn't offer any disclaimers.

Is the sitting president afflicted by conditions which are still often referred to as "mental illnesses?" We would guess that the answer is yes, but we have no training and no experience in this area. 

Given the president's erratic behavior, we do think that Mary Trump was right when she made these remarks:

It's great that the majority of the American people are starting to wake up to this. But I have to say, it's a long time coming.

We think it's the American press corps, not the American electorate, which may be "starting to wake up to" the deeply unfortunate possibilities in question here. That said, it has been "a long time coming." 

For better or worse, these possibilities have been disappeared dating back to Dr. Bandy X. Lee's 2017 best-seller. And as Burnett said to Mary Trump:

We're talking about a possible war about to happen, right?

We've long advised you to "pity the child" with respect to such unfortunate matters. It's also true that a person afflicted with a diagnosable "personality disorder" may make perfectly reasonable decisions in particular circumstances.

Of course, some such state of affairs may also be quite dangerous. And tragically but unmistakably, the sitting president has been quite erratic in thought, word and deed.

The president has seemed to be quite erratic. First with Brooks, then with Mary Trump's exchange with Burnett, we may be seeing the upper-end press corps struggling to break away from a self-imposed conceptual straitjacket.

This is part of the unimpressive intellectual history of this deeply troubled era. Even on this difficult day, we think it should be recorded. 

("Somewhere ages and ages hence," someone may find this of value.)


32 comments:



  1. "Mary Trump joined David Brooks!"

    You're an idiot, you know that? A boring one too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. About 90 percent of the obsessive Bob haters here have some extremely serious personality disorders as well. Just cram it you guys, ok?

      Delete
    2. The hero worship for Bob is ridiculous.
      Anyone can repeat Right-wing grievances. Just look at the mainstream media.

      Delete
  2. Bob, turn on the TV. Something is happening.

    ReplyDelete
  3. David Brooks has to use the magic words ("Liberals were correct all along."), if he wants us to start buying his act now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Operation FAFO
    Let's GOOOOOOOOO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So the reason for spending hundreds of billions and putting our soldiers in harms way is what Beavis?

      Delete
    2. To prevent the evil Iranian regime from having nuclear weapons. It is not complicated.

      Delete
    3. Dickhead David, we already "obliterated" their weapons you asshole troll. Try again fuckhead.

      Delete
    4. The President told us the nuclear weapons were previously "obliterated" you fucking idiot troll. Make some more stupid shit up. What a maroon.

      Delete
  5. Iran threatened to release the entire Epstein Files to the American public.
    Trump had no choice but to ask Israel to bomb Iran.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What does Mary Trump think about Operation EPIC FURY?
    We're on the edge of our seats.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It’s quite silly to think bombing other countries will deflect public attention away from the connection between Epstein’s criminal enterprise and Trump (and his wealthy cronies), and the way those same people are hell bent on destroying our country in order to make themselves richer and ease the general emotional discomfort of their sad existence.

    But it’s no joke, many people will be killed.

    All because Trump couldn’t keep it in his pants, couldn’t resist his trauma-borne urges to dominate others, couldn’t stop himself from raping minors and sexually assaulting a slew of female victims. Trump is a repugnant and revolting criminal, but it’s also really sad what happened to Trump to make him that way, how our society, dominated by right wingers and their twisted and demented values, keeps producing, reproducing, these monsters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Everyone I know is talking about Iran now and no one is talking about Epstein. In fairness no one was talking about Epstein before. No one cares about Epstein. Democrats think they have a cudgel against Trump but they don't. It's an IQ test. No one but gullible wine moms care already Democrats and they believe every wild conspiracy about everything.

      Delete
    2. If that's what the troll stinks.

      Delete
    3. It's better to wait for Mary Trump to weigh in on the whole Epstein matter.

      Delete
    4. Why is Trump condemned for his past relationships with women, epstein, and immigration, when Clinton and many others did far worse crimes of the exact same nature, then moralize and condemn Trump?

      Americans question the hypocrisy of the Democratic Party they once supported.

      Delete
    5. Lock all the guilty up. Capeesh? dumbass

      Delete
    6. Trump could literally give black people reparations for slavery, and lose every Republican voter.

      Delete
  8. Bob loves him some David Brooks, that right wing/Republican pundit infamous for his views that blow in the win; both engaging in empty careers spent chasing clout and coin.

    Today Bob puts his thumb in the scale, pushing a false narrative about Brooks trailblazing on Trumps incredibly obvious behavioral issues.

    Brother, please.

    Who is Bob trying to fool?

    Typical of right wingers, Bob’s poor thinking is tedious, and, considering the circumstances, wildly out of touch.

    ReplyDelete
  9. That’s a take: By highlighting Trump’s mental disorder, Somerby reveals that he secretly supports Trump.

    ReplyDelete
  10. David Brooks overlooks Trump's tendency to use ad hominem a arguments along with valid arguments, rather than as a replacement for valid arguments.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fuck off dumbass troll.

      Delete
    2. "...ad hominem arguments along with valid arguments..."

      That doesn't make the ad hominem ok.

      Delete
  11. Arguers sometime skirt the issue. The issue is whether attacking Iran today is good policy. But, some people ignore the main issue and focus on side issues: Did the attack violate international law? Did it violate American law? Should Congress have been part of the decision? Is Trump mentally ill? Was Epstein the real purpose of the attack? Is the US in the pocket of Israel and Zionists?

    Give me a break. Critics: please give us your analysis and evaluation of the attack itself. Don't hide among side issues.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is the nuclear program being bombed to oblivion just a few months back a side issue. You dopes immediately switch your opinion with every felon flip flop. Losers all.

      Delete
    2. Yes, Quaker, especially because the claim here is frivolous. There is no clear "international law" that applies to this attack. Is there some law book that's applicable to the United States? I do not know of any.

      Domestically it's no doubt that a President has the power to order a military strike without Congressional approval. A power that has been routinely used by many Presidents of both parties.

      Delete
    3. The right thing to do is hang a half a dozen high-ranking Republicans from light poles in gas stations, so the rest will run to prison.
      Today is Day One.

      Delete
  12. Yes, you fucking whore troll.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "Perhaps the most bizarre part of the approximately three minutes that Trump spent talking about Iran was the president’s claim that Tehran wants to make a deal, “but we haven’t heard those secret words, ‘We will never have a nuclear weapon.’” Iranian officials have repeatedly said that they have no intention of building a nuclear weapon. After Trump’s speech, the country’s foreign minister said it again." Dipshit troll

    ReplyDelete
  14. "Secret words" putzes, the whole lot of you.

    ReplyDelete