SATURDAY: The miracle suddenly looks like this!

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2026

Eighth-graders bypass Lourdes: We'd call it one of his weak spots. 

As we noted in Monday's report, Nicholas Kristof has endorsed the claim of that "Mississippi miracle" in a recent column for the New York Times.

(To his credit, he didn't use the term "miracle," nor has he done so in the past. Almost everyone does.)

The miracle involves the miraculous Naep scores produced by that state's (good, decent, deserving) public school kids. As you may know, the Naep is a highly regarded federal program which tests reading and math, every few years, in Grade 4 and Grade 8. 

(For most purposes, there are reasons to skip the Grade 12 scores.). 

The Naep is a highly regarded program. On Tuesday, we focused on this miraculous finding, as cited in Kristof's column:

These Three Red States Are the Best Hope in Schooling

[...]

Black fourth graders in Mississippi are on average better readers than those in Massachusetts, which is often thought to have the best public school system in the country (and one that spends twice as much per pupil).

Say what? Mississippi's black fourth graders outperformed their counterparts in Massachusetts? 

At least on its face, that claim is correct! Whatever the explanation might be, here are the relevant scores from the most recent testing:

Average scores, 2024 Naep 
Black kids, Grade 4 reading

Massachusetts: 202.86
Mississippi: 205.93

If genuine, that may or may not constitute a miracle. But given the circumstances mentioned by Kristof, it looks like a major accomplishment.

(According to a very rough rule of thumb, a gap of 10-11 points on the Naep is often said to correspond, very roughly, to one academic year.)

As if to prove that everyone makes mistakes, we then uncorked a whopper. (As we've mentioned several times, the incessant flooding of the zone has had us feeling overwhelmed. Plus, the Super Bowl!)

As of today, a double groaner has been corrected in Tuesday's report. What we had meant to present can be seen belowMississippi's white fourth graders also came fairly close to matching the kids up north:

Average scores, 2024 Naep
White kids, Grade 4 reading

Massachusetts: 233.21
Mississippi: 230.85

(By the way: When we look at the giant gaps between white and black kids in each of those states, do we really want to claim that anyone's producing a miracle at this point in time?)

At any rate, there you see the fourth grade scores from the most recent Naep. Mississippi's black kids outscored their peers in Massachusetts. Mississippi's white kids came close.

If nothing is "wrong" with those test scores, that result would seem to represent a substantial, surprising accomplishment. That said, adult life doesn't begin after fourth gradeand here are the corresponding scores from that same year for eighth grade students in those two states:

Average scores, 2024 Naep
Black kids, Grade 8 reading

Massachusetts: 252.03
Mississippi: 242.94
Average scores, 2024 Naep
White kids, Grade 8 reading

Massachusetts: 275.88
Mississippi: 263.83

Borrowing from the early Dylan: But oh, what kind of miracle is this, which goes from great to worse?

There you see a puzzling aspect of this alleged miracle. Over the course of quite a few years, Mississippi's fourth graders have been racking up surprising, nearly miraculous test scores. But by the time the state's kids reach Grade 8, the scores continue to look quite a bit like what they were in the past.

Quickly, let's state the obvious:

The fourth graders who performed so well in 2024 may still be performing that well when they reach the eighth grade and are tested in 2028. But Mississippi's well-intention education reforms have been in place for a long time, and this same pattern keeps showing up:

A miracle seems to be present in Grade 4. But there's no sign of any such phenomenon when you look at the scores from Grade 8.

Why might such a pattern obtain? After fifty years of flogging varieties of this horse, we won't waste our time going there today. For today, we'll only ask you this:

If kids are doing well in fourth grade, but have regressed by the time they finish eighth grade, then what good was that early achievementassuming it really existed?

Kristof cited the Grade 4 scores; he didn't cite Grade 8. In the process, he retold a type of story which has been told ever since the 1960s, when we the people began to pretend that we actually care about black kids.

It's the story of the (alleged) public school miracle, allegedly produced by the handful of people who actually care! Versions of this story have floated around at least since 1967, when 36 Children appeared

In the early 1970s, by total coincidence, we stumbled upon one of the ways miraculous test scores will sometimes appear. (Two friends described the outrageous cheating taking place in their high-scoring, low-income schoola school which was endlessly praised in the Baltimore Sun.)

By the early 1980s, we had stumbled into a telephone relationship with a top executive at one of that era's major testing companies. He was the first to tell us how bad this phenomenon can sometimes get. 

(He told us that school districts can pay to have their students' answer sheets scanned for unusual erasure patterns. Three decades later, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution blew the whistle on the "erasure parties" staged within Atlanta's schools, in which teachers gathered to change reams of wrong answers on students' completed answer sheets to the answers which was correct.)

We know of zero reason to assume that any such fraudulent behavior ever took place in Mississippi. As far as we know, no such misconduct is even possible with respect to the Naep, given the way the Naep is administered.

That said, one event after another, through many long years, convinced us that no one should ever accept these miracle claims on their face. Simple story:

Our journalists love to tell these storiesand repeatedly, these stories turn out to be bogus.

We the humans have pleasing stories we simply love to tell! The story of the educational miracle engineered by the handful of people who actually care is one of these treasured tales.

Note to Kristof, whose overall work we marvel at and greatly admire:

Our "education experts" were endlessly asleep at the switch, down through the many long years, as these feel-good stories came and went. So was the New York Times! When the whistle was finally blown on major cheating scandals in Atlanta and (apparently) in D.C., it was the Atlanta paper, and the much-maligned USA Today, which finally did the work.

(When Michelle Rhee was nominated to be chancellor of the D.C. schools, it was obvious that something was crazily wrong with the test score gains she was claiming from her short teaching career. It was obvious that her claims didn't make statistical sensebut so what? The Washington Post agreed to roll over and pretend that nothing was wrong.)

(Also, Philadelphia.)

Yes, Virginia! We were even present, behind the scenes, when Dr. John Cannell unveiled his Lake Wobegon Reports in the late 1980swhen he reported, perhaps a bit inaccurately, that every state in the nation was reporting that their statewide test scores were, in fact, above average! 

That was a wonderfully comical narrative hook, and the nation's journalists briefly took note. After that, our education journalists went back to sleep, snoring loudly alongside our education experts.

(Back in 2006, we demonstrated that the miracle story concerning one Washington area elementary school was in fact horribly wrong. The Washington Post's Jay Mathews, with whom we share the old school system tie and whose work we greatly admire, told the tale right here.)

Full disclosure: There are certain feel-good stories we humans love to tell! We continue to tell those stories, no matter how often such stories turn out to be bogus.

As to the apparent anomalies in Mississippi's scoring patterns, we know of zero reason to think that overt acts of fraud have ever been part of the story. (Repeatwe know of zero reason.) 

That said, the scoring pattern doesn't seem to make sense. Still, the story lives on.

Anthropologists crowd our dreams at night, telling us things like this:

This is who, and this is what, we actually are as a species!

For the record, there's a different possible explanation for those anomalous Mississippi scoring patterns. We don't know if it's right or wrong.

(Then too, we can think of one or two more.)

We're no longer going to bother with such maddening explorations. That's especially true at this point, as the entire American political structure may be crashing to the ground. 

Is something "wrong" with those Grade 4 scores? To this day, we can't answer that question. We can say that Mississippi's eighth grade scores don't seem to be playing along.

Again, we apologize for Tuesday's dispiriting blunder. We've corrected the blunder in Tuesday's report. The flooding of the zone!

Now for the rest of the story: Still in the early 1980s, that high executive told us that he was leaving the testing business. He said that his company was losing market share to a rival testing companyand he said they felt they couldn't compete, because the rival company was allegedly faking its data (its "norms") so as to produce better test scores.

The executive, who is no longer living, went on to a different public career. Just for the record: 

At that time, it was publicly reported that the Iowa Test of Basic Skills was losing substantial market share to the California Achievement Test. At some point, the switch was made here in Baltimore, perhaps because it was widely bruited that urban systems ended up with better scores on the latter test.

We're telling you what the executive said. We don't know if his suspicions were accurate. 


4 comments:


  1. "We don't know if it's right or wrong."

    Nobody cares. As long as their education doesn't turn children into woke zombies, it's fine.

    Besides, in this day and age, in this world controlled by Democrat-globalist vermin, education has lost all of its value in the West: you can easily find a well-educated serf, in India or Thailand, who will work for a bowl of rice.

    Tell your children to quit school and learn a fucking trade!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is telling that foreign students are being blocked from higher ed (grad programs) by Trump's immigration policies. Our universities used to be the best in the world and now our own students are being handicapped in their ability to do the work required at that level. Without grad students, research will be disabled and without innovation our businesses and technology will be slowed in its progress. The stupidest people in our country (Trump and his buddies) are destroying what has made our American economy strong, the innovation and technological progress that has led in so many industries. If you block the pathway to learning in the early grades, kids don't succeed in higher grades and they cannot compete.

      Years ago, Eisenhower recognized that America would need better education to compete in a world economy. He invested in schools. Later, Ronald Reagan commissioned a study called A Nation at Risk, again recognizing the need to invest in all students, including gifted and talented, and pushed schools to nurture talent. George W. Bush temporarily derailed such efforts by linking teacher pay with student performance and revising curriculum, but our schools were doing well before covid, especially in math improvement.

      Trump doesn't value education and he doesn't recognize the link between education, innovation, technological progress and a booming economy. He is a stupid man who inherited money and then learned to grift and con. We do not want our kids to acquire those skills, but to learn how to accomplish real and lasting contributions to our nation's success (and their own) through effort and knowledge, not branding and lying.

      Somerby has been anti-intellectual and anti-expertise just like Trump and others in his kakistocracy. They think they can appoint unqualified people to high positions and fake their way through crises. So we have a screw up like the El Paso use of anti-drone tech against party balloons, and DOJ prosecutors who can't get a grand jury to bring indictments, and other screw ups due to lack of expertise. Trump is the screw up in chief.

      That Somerby does not link our govts failures to lack of expertise shows that he does not understand what education is for. Neither does 10:56. First, kids can't learn a trade if they can't read or write or do math. Second, kids in manual labor jobs can't afford to buy Oura rings or other high tech goodies, because they can't even afford rent, much less buy a house. Third, the people who consider "woke" worse than illiteracy don't know what it takes to create a satisfying life, without lying, cheating and stealing.

      The connection between lack of education is most visible among prison inmates. They take shortcuts via crime because they can't succeed any other way, but being stupid and uneducated, they get caught and wind up as wards of the state. Now imagine more of our population unable to succeed at work and thus being imprisoned at public expense. That is where we are headed after Trump and his cronies destroy public education.

      Delete
  2. Trump paid to have someone take his tests for him, enabling him to claim that he graduated from some top schools. Does that discredit those schools or our education system in general?

    Here are some things that Somerby neglects to mention. The Department of Education, which administers the NAEP nationwide, has been disbanded by Trump's administration. In general, cheating in schools occurs under two conditions: (1) students do not feel they can succeed with reasonable effort, (2) high stakes are tied to success. During the cheating scandals Somerby refers to, school districts were being funded according to formulas that tied student progress to school funding, and teachers were being evaluated based on "value added" formulas that linked their pay to student improvement. Unfortunately, neither districts nor teachers have all of the influences on student performance under their control. That meant they were being held accountable for things they could not influence, including student family income (strongly associated with student performance) and means of improving student success in their classrooms (dictated by administrators not teachers). So, you have a situation where teacher pay and district funding are based on student test scores but teachers and districts did not have control over improving student performance. Those are exactly the circumstances under which student cheat, so it should be no surprise that some districts would cheat too, because people are people.

    Teacher who are reasonably well trained (as Somerby was not), are taught how to prevent cheating and eliminate the conditions that made students desperate enough to attempt it. It is part of good teaching to do that. Somerby's model is to blame the profession and our educational institutions. He appears to have been horribly disillusioned by the scandals of the 1970s & 1980s, but as he notes, these did not involve NAEP, and in fact had nothing to do with NAEP. NAEP does not report individualized results for specific students and it is not tied to district funding. It is a measure of educational progress nationwide and no one cares enough about those results to cheat on the test. But Somerby has an ulterior motive -- to suggest that reading improvement in MS is bunk and that schools in generally are crapping and unreliable.

    It is very odd that a man who spent 10-12 years teaching (depending on which bio you believe) would have no little faith in the ability of schools to help children acquire knowledge. Yet Somerby never misses an opportunity to attack education, from K through college. I am daily thankful that Somerby left teaching. I only wonder about the circumstances that caused him to finally pull the plug and become a comedian instead of an educator. The usual tenure of a new, poorly trained teacher is about 3 years and most such teachers do leave before the 10 year mark. I tend to believe Somerby when he says he stayed to avoid the draft, given that the Vietnam war ended about the time he quit teaching. But I also think his suspicion of the teaching establishment may have prevented him from learning how to teach well, leading him to assume that all teachers were as bad as he was, working with the most difficult students (inner city black kids from poor families and lacking educational resources in the home). He was apparently indoctrinated by Teach for America, believed that experienced educators had nothing to teach him, used dubious approaches (some of which he has described here), and was unable to produce miracles of any kind. So he gave up on the teaching profession, his kids and himself. Too many people give up on poor black kids but Somerby used to claim that he was the only one who cared about them. That is as ridiculous as today's screed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Education is going through some rough times today. Covid was devastating to students and teachers. Now the attack by Trump on public education is doing more damage. Somerby could have written about that, but has chosen not to. Attempting to shift to use of technology in the classroom is not going to work any better now, than in the past, and we are entering a time of upheaval with AI that will affect student job prospects. Teachers know that human interaction is needed for learning but those inventing new machines think kids can learn from screens. That didn't work when TV was introduced into classrooms, nor did it work with learning machines or laptops, and AI is not going to help either, no matter how great the appeal of cost-reducing measures.

      These are difficult times. What Somerby is doing here by attacking MS's investment in reading, will hurt, not help, students and their families.

      Delete