SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2026
Eighth-graders bypass Lourdes: We'd call it one of his weak spots.
As we noted in Monday's report, Nicholas Kristof has endorsed the claim of that "Mississippi miracle" in a recent column for the New York Times.
(To his credit, he didn't use the term "miracle," nor has he done so in the past. Almost everyone does.)
The miracle involves the miraculous Naep scores produced by that state's (good, decent, deserving) public school kids. As you may know, the Naep is a highly regarded federal program which tests reading and math, every few years, in Grade 4 and Grade 8.
(For most purposes, there are reasons to skip the Grade 12 scores.).
The Naep is a highly regarded program. On Tuesday, we focused on this miraculous finding, as cited in Kristof's column:
These Three Red States Are the Best Hope in Schooling
[...]
Black fourth graders in Mississippi are on average better readers than those in Massachusetts, which is often thought to have the best public school system in the country (and one that spends twice as much per pupil).
Say what? Mississippi's black fourth graders outperformed their counterparts in Massachusetts?
At least on its face, that claim is correct! Whatever the explanation might be, here are the relevant scores from the most recent testing:
Average scores, 2024 Naep
Black kids, Grade 4 reading
Massachusetts: 202.86
Mississippi: 205.93
If genuine, that may or may not constitute a miracle. But given the circumstances mentioned by Kristof, it looks like a major accomplishment.
(According to a very rough rule of thumb, a gap of 10-11 points on the Naep is often said to correspond, very roughly, to one academic year.)
As if to prove that everyone makes mistakes, we then uncorked a whopper. (As we've mentioned several times, the incessant flooding of the zone has had us feeling overwhelmed. Plus, the Super Bowl!)
As of today, a double groaner has been corrected in Tuesday's report. What we had meant to present can be seen below—Mississippi's white fourth graders also came fairly close to matching the kids up north:
Average scores, 2024 Naep
White kids, Grade 4 reading
Massachusetts: 233.21
Mississippi: 230.85
(By the way: When we look at the giant gaps between white and black kids in each of those states, do we really want to claim that anyone's producing a miracle at this point in time?)
At any rate, there you see the fourth grade scores from the most recent Naep. Mississippi's black kids outscored their peers in Massachusetts. Mississippi's white kids came close.
If nothing is "wrong" with those test scores, that result would seem to represent a substantial, surprising accomplishment. That said, adult life doesn't begin after fourth grade—and here are the corresponding scores from that same year for eighth grade students in those two states:
Average scores, 2024 Naep
Black kids, Grade 8 reading
Massachusetts: 252.03
Mississippi: 242.94
Average scores, 2024 Naep
White kids, Grade 8 reading
Massachusetts: 275.88
Mississippi: 263.83
Borrowing from the early Dylan: But oh, what kind of miracle is this, which goes from great to worse?
There you see a puzzling aspect of this alleged miracle. Over the course of quite a few years, Mississippi's fourth graders have been racking up surprising, nearly miraculous test scores. But by the time the state's kids reach Grade 8, the scores continue to look quite a bit like what they were in the past.
Quickly, let's state the obvious:
The fourth graders who performed so well in 2024 may still be performing that well when they reach the eighth grade and are tested in 2028. But Mississippi's well-intention education reforms have been in place for a long time, and this same pattern keeps showing up:
A miracle seems to be present in Grade 4. But there's no sign of any such phenomenon when you look at the scores from Grade 8.
Why might such a pattern obtain? After fifty years of flogging varieties of this horse, we won't waste our time going there today. For today, we'll only ask you this:
If kids are doing well in fourth grade, but have regressed by the time they finish eighth grade, then what good was that early achievement—assuming it really existed?
Kristof cited the Grade 4 scores; he didn't cite Grade 8. In the process, he retold a type of story which has been told ever since the 1960s, when we the people began to pretend that we actually care about black kids.
It's the story of the (alleged) public school miracle, allegedly produced by the handful of people who actually care! Versions of this story have floated around at least since 1967, when 36 Children appeared.
In the early 1970s, by total coincidence, we stumbled upon one of the ways miraculous test scores will sometimes appear. (Two friends described the outrageous cheating taking place in their high-scoring, low-income school—a school which was endlessly praised in the Baltimore Sun.)
By the early 1980s, we had stumbled into a telephone relationship with a top executive at one of that era's major testing companies. He was the first to tell us how bad this phenomenon can sometimes get.
(He told us that school districts can pay to have their students' answer sheets scanned for unusual erasure patterns. Three decades later, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution blew the whistle on the "erasure parties" staged within Atlanta's schools, in which teachers gathered to change reams of wrong answers on students' completed answer sheets to the answers which was correct.)
We know of zero reason to assume that any such fraudulent behavior ever took place in Mississippi. As far as we know, no such misconduct is even possible with respect to the Naep, given the way the Naep is administered.
That said, one event after another, through many long years, convinced us that no one should ever accept these miracle claims on their face. Simple story:
Our journalists love to tell these stories—and repeatedly, these stories turn out to be bogus.
We the humans have pleasing stories we simply love to tell! The story of the educational miracle engineered by the handful of people who actually care is one of these treasured tales.
Note to Kristof, whose overall work we marvel at and greatly admire:
Our "education experts" were endlessly asleep at the switch, down through the many long years, as these feel-good stories came and went. So was the New York Times! When the whistle was finally blown on major cheating scandals in Atlanta and (apparently) in D.C., it was the Atlanta paper, and the much-maligned USA Today, which finally did the work.
(When Michelle Rhee was nominated to be chancellor of the D.C. schools, it was obvious that something was crazily wrong with the test score gains she was claiming from her short teaching career. It was obvious that her claims didn't make statistical sense—but so what? The Washington Post agreed to roll over and pretend that nothing was wrong.)
Yes, Virginia! We were even present, behind the scenes, when Dr. John Cannell unveiled his Lake Wobegon Reports in the late 1980s—when he reported, perhaps a bit inaccurately, that every state in the nation was reporting that their statewide test scores were, in fact, above average!
That was a wonderfully comical narrative hook, and the nation's journalists briefly took note. After that, our education journalists went back to sleep, snoring loudly alongside our education experts.
(Back in 2006, we demonstrated that the miracle story concerning one Washington area elementary school was in fact horribly wrong. The Washington Post's Jay Mathews, with whom we share the old school system tie and whose work we greatly admire, told the tale right here.)
Full disclosure: There are certain feel-good stories we humans love to tell! We continue to tell those stories, no matter how often such stories turn out to be bogus.
As to the apparent anomalies in Mississippi's scoring patterns, we know of zero reason to think that overt acts of fraud have ever been part of the story. (Repeat—we know of zero reason.)
That said, the scoring pattern doesn't seem to make sense. Still, the story lives on.
Anthropologists crowd our dreams at night, telling us things like this:
This is who, and this is what, we actually are as a species!
For the record, there's a different possible explanation for those anomalous Mississippi scoring patterns. We don't know if it's right or wrong.
(Then too, we can think of one or two more.)
We're no longer going to bother with such maddening explorations. That's especially true at this point, as the entire American political structure may be crashing to the ground.
Is something "wrong" with those Grade 4 scores? To this day, we can't answer that question. We can say that Mississippi's eighth grade scores don't seem to be playing along.
Again, we apologize for Tuesday's dispiriting blunder. We've corrected the blunder in Tuesday's report. The flooding of the zone!
Now for the rest of the story: Still in the early 1980s, that high executive told us that he was leaving the testing business. He said that his company was losing market share to a rival testing company—and he said they felt they couldn't compete, because the rival company was allegedly faking its data (its "norms") so as to produce better test scores.
The executive, who is no longer living, went on to a different public career. Just for the record:
At that time, it was publicly reported that the Iowa Test of Basic Skills was losing substantial market share to the California Achievement Test. At some point, the switch was made here in Baltimore, perhaps because it was widely bruited that urban systems ended up with better scores on the latter test.
We're telling you what the executive said. We don't know if his suspicions were accurate.
ReplyDelete"We don't know if it's right or wrong."
Nobody cares. As long as their education doesn't turn children into woke zombies, it's fine.
Besides, in this day and age, in this world controlled by Democrat-globalist vermin, education has lost all of its value in the West: you can easily find a well-educated serf, in India or Thailand, who will work for a bowl of rice.
Tell your children to quit school and learn a fucking trade!
It is telling that foreign students are being blocked from higher ed (grad programs) by Trump's immigration policies. Our universities used to be the best in the world and now our own students are being handicapped in their ability to do the work required at that level. Without grad students, research will be disabled and without innovation our businesses and technology will be slowed in its progress. The stupidest people in our country (Trump and his buddies) are destroying what has made our American economy strong, the innovation and technological progress that has led in so many industries. If you block the pathway to learning in the early grades, kids don't succeed in higher grades and they cannot compete.
DeleteYears ago, Eisenhower recognized that America would need better education to compete in a world economy. He invested in schools. Later, Ronald Reagan commissioned a study called A Nation at Risk, again recognizing the need to invest in all students, including gifted and talented, and pushed schools to nurture talent. George W. Bush temporarily derailed such efforts by linking teacher pay with student performance and revising curriculum, but our schools were doing well before covid, especially in math improvement.
Trump doesn't value education and he doesn't recognize the link between education, innovation, technological progress and a booming economy. He is a stupid man who inherited money and then learned to grift and con. We do not want our kids to acquire those skills, but to learn how to accomplish real and lasting contributions to our nation's success (and their own) through effort and knowledge, not branding and lying.
Somerby has been anti-intellectual and anti-expertise just like Trump and others in his kakistocracy. They think they can appoint unqualified people to high positions and fake their way through crises. So we have a screw up like the El Paso use of anti-drone tech against party balloons, and DOJ prosecutors who can't get a grand jury to bring indictments, and other screw ups due to lack of expertise. Trump is the screw up in chief.
That Somerby does not link our govts failures to lack of expertise shows that he does not understand what education is for. Neither does 10:56. First, kids can't learn a trade if they can't read or write or do math. Second, kids in manual labor jobs can't afford to buy Oura rings or other high tech goodies, because they can't even afford rent, much less buy a house. Third, the people who consider "woke" worse than illiteracy don't know what it takes to create a satisfying life, without lying, cheating and stealing.
The connection between lack of education is most visible among prison inmates. They take shortcuts via crime because they can't succeed any other way, but being stupid and uneducated, they get caught and wind up as wards of the state. Now imagine more of our population unable to succeed at work and thus being imprisoned at public expense. That is where we are headed after Trump and his cronies destroy public education.
Trump paid to have someone take his tests for him, enabling him to claim that he graduated from some top schools. Does that discredit those schools or our education system in general?
ReplyDeleteHere are some things that Somerby neglects to mention. The Department of Education, which administers the NAEP nationwide, has been disbanded by Trump's administration. In general, cheating in schools occurs under two conditions: (1) students do not feel they can succeed with reasonable effort, (2) high stakes are tied to success. During the cheating scandals Somerby refers to, school districts were being funded according to formulas that tied student progress to school funding, and teachers were being evaluated based on "value added" formulas that linked their pay to student improvement. Unfortunately, neither districts nor teachers have all of the influences on student performance under their control. That meant they were being held accountable for things they could not influence, including student family income (strongly associated with student performance) and means of improving student success in their classrooms (dictated by administrators not teachers). So, you have a situation where teacher pay and district funding are based on student test scores but teachers and districts did not have control over improving student performance. Those are exactly the circumstances under which student cheat, so it should be no surprise that some districts would cheat too, because people are people.
Teacher who are reasonably well trained (as Somerby was not), are taught how to prevent cheating and eliminate the conditions that made students desperate enough to attempt it. It is part of good teaching to do that. Somerby's model is to blame the profession and our educational institutions. He appears to have been horribly disillusioned by the scandals of the 1970s & 1980s, but as he notes, these did not involve NAEP, and in fact had nothing to do with NAEP. NAEP does not report individualized results for specific students and it is not tied to district funding. It is a measure of educational progress nationwide and no one cares enough about those results to cheat on the test. But Somerby has an ulterior motive -- to suggest that reading improvement in MS is bunk and that schools in generally are crapping and unreliable.
It is very odd that a man who spent 10-12 years teaching (depending on which bio you believe) would have no little faith in the ability of schools to help children acquire knowledge. Yet Somerby never misses an opportunity to attack education, from K through college. I am daily thankful that Somerby left teaching. I only wonder about the circumstances that caused him to finally pull the plug and become a comedian instead of an educator. The usual tenure of a new, poorly trained teacher is about 3 years and most such teachers do leave before the 10 year mark. I tend to believe Somerby when he says he stayed to avoid the draft, given that the Vietnam war ended about the time he quit teaching. But I also think his suspicion of the teaching establishment may have prevented him from learning how to teach well, leading him to assume that all teachers were as bad as he was, working with the most difficult students (inner city black kids from poor families and lacking educational resources in the home). He was apparently indoctrinated by Teach for America, believed that experienced educators had nothing to teach him, used dubious approaches (some of which he has described here), and was unable to produce miracles of any kind. So he gave up on the teaching profession, his kids and himself. Too many people give up on poor black kids but Somerby used to claim that he was the only one who cared about them. That is as ridiculous as today's screed.
Education is going through some rough times today. Covid was devastating to students and teachers. Now the attack by Trump on public education is doing more damage. Somerby could have written about that, but has chosen not to. Attempting to shift to use of technology in the classroom is not going to work any better now, than in the past, and we are entering a time of upheaval with AI that will affect student job prospects. Teachers know that human interaction is needed for learning but those inventing new machines think kids can learn from screens. That didn't work when TV was introduced into classrooms, nor did it work with learning machines or laptops, and AI is not going to help either, no matter how great the appeal of cost-reducing measures.
DeleteThese are difficult times. What Somerby is doing here by attacking MS's investment in reading, will hurt, not help, students and their families.
Men don't like women because women do better than them in school, even in math. Women have to be confined by restrictive social rules that benefit the patriarchy, because otherwise they would dominate men and men are afraid of that. So they limit the competition.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile, here is Nick Fuentes (a neo-Nazi friend of Trump) who is very concerned about declining birthrates among white people:
“...the number one political enemy is women. straight up, I’m telling it like it is. people might say it’s Jews, it’s Democrats, it’s white liberals, it’s leftists, it’s the Chinese. our number one political enemy is women. because woman constrain everything. every conversation, every man, everything. they have to be imprisoned. they are the ones that are hurting the fertility rate, they are the ones making us sympathetic to poor people — which are also brown people.” [Tiedrich]
Black Dick,
DeleteFuentes and the Republican Party are deathly afraid of you for some reason.
David R. Lurie at American Prospect says:
ReplyDelete"We are all passengers in Trump’s death cab, The nihilism of the regime is its most terrifying attribute."
He then lists the destruction of America's strengths under Trump and his apparent lack of concern about it.
https://www.publicnotice.co/p/trump-polling
Lurie doesn't mention education but it should be on his list.
One of my ongoing grudges against Somerby is his own nihilism. His lack of caring about any of the things that are important and valuable about our nation, our strengths, and his willingness to follow Trump and the right in their destruction of both material and abstract positive attributes of our nation. Somerby's doom and gloom moaning over the death of democracy, our lack of virtue as human beings, our "earning our way out" when trying to enact positives on the left, and never mentioning the stench, corruption and filth of our Dear Leader, any of his many screwups, his incompetent staff installed in every important office and the way Trump exhibits evil traits (not just delusions and personality defects). Somerby ignores all that is bad and wrong with Trump's administration, the right that fails to hold Trump accountable, in order to attack the press (mostly on the left) while repeating Gutfeld's worst jokes. None of this makes any sense except as support for Trump, since Somerby simultaneously attacks remaining good in our country.
Somerby would be driving Trump's death cab, if they offered him the job. Look at what he has written today about reading improvement in MS. He doesn't know whether it is real, but there has been educational cheating in other circumstances, but he can't say it isn't real, he just doubts all over it, like Trump farting through a cabinet meeting. Because education isn't really working, he says, so MS is probably lying and cheating, even if he can't prove it. Because that's what teachers do.
Gosh, how would it benefit Somerby's ego to believe that no one can teach poor black kids and the ones who make some progress must be cheating?
I watched an Olympics-related movie on Prime yesterday, Raising the Bar: The Alma Richards Story. It was about a young Mormon farmer who won a gold medal in high jumping at the 1912 Stockholm Olympics. It shows how he dropped out in 8th grade to be a ranch hand, met a college professor accidentally at a hotel who convinced him to figure out what his "calling" in life was, which caused him to return to high school. There, he was recruited by the track and field coach and discovered his athletic ability. He went from there to BYU's prep school where he was bullied by other students (for being big and stupid) but went on to try out for the Olympic team at the urging of his coach. He again was bullied by the team members and that undermined his ability to do his best, until he was encouraged by Jim Thorpe (also on the team) and overcame his concern over what other people thought about him.
ReplyDeleteWhat the film doesn't show is that he continued in the sport by attending college, obtained a degree and ultimately a law degree, but chose to teach school in Venice High School, CA for 30+ years, because he believed it was important to give to others, and vanity to pursue fame and accolades in the form of awards.
The desire to be of service motivates most teachers. Not Somerby, since he was motivated to avoid the draft and avoided acquiring skills to be useful to his students. Someone who denigrates the efforts of others is not suited to teaching because it undermines confidence and does nothing to encourage perseverance. Somerby exemplifies the bullies who taunted Richards, to bring him down even after they themselves washed out of the competition. Alma (a name with religious significance) Richards taught science. His own school experiences no doubt gave him empathy for the struggles of his students with difficult subject matter. Teaching is always about motivating students, not just conveying information.