BATTLES: The battles are fought by people like these!

THURSDAY, MARCH 19, 2026

Gutfeld's medical specialists: James Talarico is 36. If anything, he may look somewhat younger.  

Adjusting for age, he strikes us as an obvious high achiever. Yesterday, we turned to the leading authority on his career for this assortment of basics

James Talarico

James Dell Talarico (born May 17, 1989) is an American politician, Presbyterian seminarian, and former educator who has served since 2018 as a member of the Texas House of Representatives. Talarico is the Democratic nominee for the 2026 U.S. Senate election in Texas...

Talarico graduated from the University of Texas at Austin with a Bachelor of Arts in government. He later joined Teach For America, where he taught sixth-grade English language arts in San Antonio. Afterward, he served as the Central Texas executive director for Reasoning Mind, a nonprofit focused on bringing technology to low-income classrooms. He later graduated from Harvard University with a Master of Education degree in education policy.

Talarico serves as vice chair of two bodies in the Texas House: the Trade, Workforce, and Economic Development Committee and the Subcommittee on Academic and Career-Oriented Education under the Public Education Committee. He also serves on the Public Education Committee and the House Administration Committee. 

[...]

Talarico's maternal grandfather was a Baptist preacher in South Texas who Talarico says taught him that Christianity "is a simple—though not easy—religion, rooted in two commandments: 'Love God and love your neighbor.' " 

At age 36, Talarico "is the Democratic nominee for the 2026 U.S. Senate election in Texas!" Like President Clinton before himThey rarely voted for me, but you'll never meet a finer bunch of people than the Arkansas Pentecostalshe knows how to talk about Christianity, as a Democrat, to a southern red state audience. 

At age 36, he's the Democratic nominee for the Texas Senate seat! We'll take it as obvious that certain Red American elites are afraid he could possibly win. 

We don't know if Talarico really can possibly win. That said, we'll take it as obvious that such fears explain what happened on Tuesday's edition of The Five, where the candidate was compared first to a deranged mass murderer / sexual pervert, then to the lunatic leader(s) of one or two lunatic cults. 

Those astounding comparisons were given voice by a pair of people we regard as rather strangeby Greg Gutfeld, age 61, but also by Emily Compagno, age 46. 

In the main, we're inclined to regard Gutfeld and Compagno as corporate messenger children for the profit-seeking Fox News Channel. Setting that impression aside, we'll offer this assessment with a high degree of confidence: 

Judged by any traditional standard, Gutfeld and Compagno belong on this nation's most-watched "cable news" program in much the way we should be hired as artistic director for Moscow's Bolshoi Ballet. 

We don't think they belong in their posts; others find their behaviors refreshing. Today, let's offer two quick examples of what those behaviors tend to be. 

Quickly, we'll start with the Christianity. Concerning the southern border, Talarico said this in a Democratic debate back at the start of the year: 

So, my family is from the border. My mom grew up in Laredo, Texas. I feel like Texans understand this issue of immigration more so than people in other states, because we live with it, both the benefits and the challenges. 

So, what I have said is that our southern border should be like our front porch. There should be a giant welcome mat out front and a lock on the door.

We can welcome immigrants who want to live the American dream, we can build a pathway to citizenship for those neighbors who have been here making us richer and stronger, and we can keep out people who mean to do us harm.

So said Talaricounless you watch the Fox News Channel, in which case he said something quite different:

On March 3, Talarico won the Democratic Party's nomination for the Texas Senate seat. Two days later, right there on The Five, Dana Perino, age 53, introduced a doctored bit of videotape in which Talarico was shown saying this:

Our southern border should be like our front porch. There should be a giant welcome mat out front.

Full stop! The Fox News Channel had disappeared the part of his statement about having a lock on the door!

In fairness to Perino, she probably didn't know that her corporate owners had created a doctored bit of tape. Also, the pay can be extremely good at the "news channel" where Perino is cast, on this nation's top-rated show, as the co-host who isn't nuts.

(For a fuller account of the doctoring of Talarico's statement, see this fact check by AFPby Agence France-Presse. Needless to say, Elon Musk, age 54, is part of this pathetic story. Somewhat instructively, we had to travel across the pond to find a formal fact-check of this pathetic misconduct.)

We'll assume that Perino didn't know that Talarico's statement had been doctored. We'll assume that Gutfeld and Compagno are unaware of this matter too.

There's no real assumption, on a show like The Five, that the four pro-MAGA co-hosts have any idea what they're talking about. With that, we move on to this:

With apologies, we're going to cite some conduct we regard as ugly and destructive, but also as deeply stupid. With apologies, we're going to take you on a brief trip inside Gutfeld's mind.

We'll start with Monday night's (primetime) Gutfeld! program. As always, the gentleman started with a few minutes of "jokes."

Most simply put, the fellow simply can't seem to quit a certain type of loathing. With apologies:

At 10:03, his final "joke" went exactly like this:

GUTFELD (3/16/26): And finally, the Best Picture [Oscar] went to One Battle After Another.

And no, that's not the name of the documentary about Rosie and her gynecologist.

In such ways, this undisguised nutcase conducts his own disordered battles everywhere all at once. Last night, at 10:03, he shoved his grimy little nose where it doesn't belong once again:

GUTFELD (3/18/26): And finally, comedian Chelsea Handler says that the house that she bought from RFK Jr. was deemed "toxic and unlivable." 

Which are the same words used by her gynecologist.

The man is 61 years old! Except for its effect on the world, we regard this as sad and pathetic. 

Simply put, he just can't seem to quit this general practice! On Tuesday night, no gynecologists were mentioned. But in his first three minutes of jokes, he compared Michelle Obama to a horse; he complained about Rosie O'Donnell's unbelievably hairy back; and he told us what President Macron thinks about his wife's penis.

We've advised you to pity the child. Let's return to our starting place:

On Tuesday's edition of The Five, this same person said he gets "Ted Bundy vibes" from the vastly more accomplished Talarico. Moments later, Compagno described Talarico as "a terrifying child" who makes her think of David Koreshand, apparently, of this second cult leader.

Over the next few days, we're going to post fuller transcripts of what these two people said about Talarico. We think a record should be created for future generations, assuming such people are going to exist.

That said:

All around the ramparts of Blue America, the strange behavior of people like Gutfeld and Compagno is met by complete, total silence. We leave you today with a question:

Whose behavior is stranger, uglier, less excusable? The behavior of the peculiar people who play the game the Fox News Channel way? Or the behavior of the self-impressed Blue elites who insist on averting their gaze?

("Thank you, silence," Alanis Morissette said. We don't think she meant this.)

Tomorrow or Saturday: What Gutfeld and Compagno said, not that anyone cares

Additional bonus language: Within the context of the song and the larger body of early work, we regard this as profound implied advice:

Thank you, India
Thank you, terror
Thank you, disillusionment
Thank you, frailty
Thank you, consequence
Thank you, thank you, silence

"You learn," this youthful seer also said. People, where in the world did that very bright person ever get that idea?

108 comments:

  1. It was despicable for an ad to curtail part of what Talarico in order to change its meaning. However, what he did say is not really satisfactory. "We can welcome immigrants who want to live the American dream ... and we can keep out people who mean to do us harm." I agree, butmthat's a cop out. The biggest challenge with illegal immigration is good people who do want to live the American dream and do not want to do us harm, but who do not meet the legal standards. Is Talarico willing to enforce the law in these cases? He did not say so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unlike Trump, Talarico abides by his oath of office, which is to uphold the Constitution and laws of the USA.

      Delete
    2. "The biggest challenge with illegal immigration is good people who do want to live the American dream and do not want to do us harm, but who do not meet the legal standards."

      What exactly is the challenge?

      Delete
    3. The challenge is how will dickhead get his lettuce picked.

      Delete
    4. Quaker in a BasementMarch 19, 2026 at 1:07 PM

      "It was despicable for an ad to curtail part of what Talarico in order to change its meaning."

      Not an ad, David. A presentation by Fox News personalities.

      Delete
    5. BTW the left uses this ugly technique more effectively than the right. How many Americans still believe that Trump called Nazis and white supremacists "good people?

      Delete
    6. Quaker in a BasementMarch 19, 2026 at 1:42 PM

      That's exactly what he did, David. Oh, sure, he made a pretend gesture at differentiating between the people who marched with tiki torches chanting "Jews will not replace us," and the people who showed up to preserve Confederate "heritage," but there isn't a difference. They were all white supremecists.

      Delete
    7. I still believe it because I heard Trump say it. It was obvious what he meant. If Trump didn't believe Nazis and white supremacists were good people, he wouldn't have given so much power to Stephen Miller. Trump wouldn't be patterning his ICE after the SS. He wouldn't have had to be advised by his staff NOT to say that Hitler did some good things. Trump isn't just Nazi-adjacent. He is one of the boys in the band.

      Delete
    8. Quaker - did your media ever tell you Trump's exact words? Snopes points out: He said in the same statement he wasn't talking about neo-Nazis and white nationalists, who he said should be "condemned totally."

      Trump could not have been more clear. There can be no ambiguity in Trump's words, "Condemned totally."
      https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/

      Delete
    9. Trump has invited Nazi's to lunch with him. Explain why that is fine David, with bullshit only you can muster...

      Delete
    10. Quaker in a BasementMarch 19, 2026 at 2:28 PM

      David: Then he explained who he thought the "good people" were.

      Delete
    11. Trump isn't special.
      No one can tell the difference between Neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and the "fine people" on the Right.

      Delete
    12. David in Cal,
      Are you intimating that Republican voters put up with Trump's disdain for Neo-Nazis, because they love that he rapes children?
      I was under the impression they put up with his raping of children, because they love his bigotry.
      I defer to your years of experience being a Republican voter.

      Delete
  2. Fox doctored a quote. That is mild behavior considering that they tell outright lies without shame or hesitation. Why does Somerby waste his time with this when there are important things to be discussed?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Give Somerby credit, Bob-slapper.
      He knows the Epstein Files aren't going to disappear themselves.

      Delete
  3. Alanis Morissette has written some obviously personal lyrics. Somerby presumes to know what she means. He doesn't.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is good news for America. Don't forget that it was not really Trump who asked for help clearing the Strait of Hormuz, it was the US making this request.
    Leading ⁠nations ⁠in Europe ⁠said in a joint statement ​with Japan on Thursday they would ‌take steps to stabilise ‌energy markets and were ⁠ready ⁠to join "appropriate efforts" to ensure safe passage ​through the Strait of Hormuz. The statement from Britain, France, Germany, Italy, the ​Netherlands and Japan, condemned attacks by ⁠Iran and ⁠called on it ⁠to ​halt its actions immediately. It also said ​they would ⁠work with certain energy producing nations to increase output and stabilise markets.
    https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2026-03-19/european-countries-and-japan-ready-to-help-on-hormuz-stabilise-energy-markets
    https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2026-03-19/european-countries-and-japan-ready-to-help-on-hormuz-stabilise-energy-markets

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Crude tops $120 - yippee, dickface

      Delete
    2. @11:58 - the higher oil price hurts you. It makes you poorer. Some people are so fixated on Trump that they're happy when something goes wrong for Trump, even when it hurts them personally.

      Delete
    3. Fuck you, dickhead! How do you figure I am happy you motherfucking cunt?

      Delete
    4. Dickface pretends he doesn’t understand sarcasm.

      Delete
    5. Yippee 1. Used to express joy or elation.

      Delete
    6. Sarcasm is a form of verbal irony used to mock, ridicule, or convey contempt, often by saying the opposite of what is actually meant.

      What a well informed wonderful commenter you are DiC.

      Delete
    7. Quaker in a BasementMarch 19, 2026 at 1:10 PM

      "...it was not really Trump who asked for help clearing the Strait of Hormuz, it was the US making this request."

      No, it was Trump. It wasn't Congress, the State Department, or the American people. It was Trump--on Truth Social.

      Delete
    8. You really are an imbecile, dickface. Orange chickenshit and Israel light the gulf on fire and you come chirping here “good news”, you jackass

      Delete
    9. Something didn’t “go wrong” for Trump. He idiotically acted to guarantee it would happen and stupidly forgot to fill the SOR before acting rashly starting WW3, fuckface

      Delete
    10. And then captain chickenshit claimed nobody could have predicted the outcome

      Delete
    11. Quaker - you know what I mean. Getting help to more quickly clear the strait was not to benefit Trump personally. It was to benefit you and me and the rest of the American people. It's true that Trump made the request, but it was on our behalf.

      Delete
    12. I think Trump made the request on his own behalf. Trump's actions to support the oil and gas industry is to benefit those businessmen. I own an EV. Trump has been doing everything possible to undermine renewable energy, including wind and solar, the sources of the power for my auto and home. Clearing the strait was to rescue Trump from his political hot water, not the American people. Trump doesn't give a damn about us.

      Delete
    13. Quaker in a BasementMarch 19, 2026 at 1:48 PM

      "We express our readiness to ​contribute to appropriate ​efforts to ensure safe ⁠passage through the Strait. We welcome the commitment of nations who are engaging in preparatory planning."

      Wake me when we see them seTrump so politely asked. These countries aren't backing Trump. They're working around him.

      Delete
    14. So David, do explain to us how the Trump admin preplanned for drone and missile attacks in the Straight? Please explain to us how is is OK with Trump to have Russia ship Shahed drones back to Iran and Russia provide targeting information to Iran to kill our soldiers. Your boy has said he is fine with Russia directing the killing of our troops. Again, explain why you support this!

      Delete
    15. Even if the idiot gets help, who the fuck will insure the doomed transport tankers? US taxpayers of course will be the only ones assigned that risk. We are such suckers for electing Republican warmongers again and again.

      Delete
    16. Hey Dickhead, I'm so old I remember you telling us we won this war just three seeks ago. How's that working out for you?

      Delete
    17. @2:05 IMO it would have been irresponsible to NOT attack Iran. They pretty much told us that they would build nuclear weapon unless stopped military. The Mullahs are evil people. We all still remember Tianamin Square massacre. Well, the Mullahs killed more of their own citizens just a few weeks ago. And, that's not something that will be remembered for decades, because it's just one of the many evil things done by Iran. Evil people should not be allowed to have nuclear weapons if there's any way to prevent that.

      Not only did Trump get the most important thing right, the attack itself could hardly be going better for the good guys. Iran already lost its air force, its navy, its air defense, most of its missiles and missile launchers, most of its arms manufacturing capability. and much of its human leadership. The US has had only a handful of casualties.

      Delete
    18. Quaker in a BasementMarch 19, 2026 at 2:32 PM

      "They pretty much told us that they would build nuclear weapon unless stopped military."

      I'll ask you to show your cards on this. A wide range of sources said they weren't building nukes.

      Delete
    19. “Both the Iranian negotiators said to us directly with, you know, no shame, that they controlled 460 kilograms of 60% [enriched uranium],” Steve Witkoff told Fox News host Sean Hannity, “and they’re aware that that could make 11 nuclear bombs, and that was the beginning of their negotiating stance.”

      "Unless stopped military" is clear, since this was non-negotiable.

      I guess one could quibble about the difference between "would build nuclear weapons" vs. "would have the capacity to rapidly build nuclear weapons." I grant you there's a slight difference.

      Delete
    20. “Both the Iranian negotiators said to us directly with, you know, no shame, that they controlled 460 kilograms of 60% [enriched uranium],” Steve Witkoff told Fox News host Sean Hannity, “and they’re aware that that could make 11 nuclear bombs, and that was the beginning of their negotiating stance.”

      "Unless stopped military" is clear, since this was non-negotiable.

      I guess one could quibble about the difference between "would build nuclear weapons" vs. "would have the capacity to rapidly build nuclear weapons." I grant you there's a slight difference.

      Delete
    21. Does owning a uranium mine mean that a nation is ready to drop bombs on people too? Why did the US need a Manhattan Project to develop a bomb that would work, if all it takes is having enough enriched uranium to make 11 bombs? What is all the testing for? This is idiotic.

      Delete
    22. Iran did not rebuild its uranium enrichment capability following joint U.S.-Israeli strikes against its nuclear program last year, U.S. Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard told a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Wednesday.

      "As a result of Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated. There has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability. The entrances to the underground facilities that were bombed have been buried and shuttered with cement," Gabard wrote in an opening statement ahead of the hearing. https://time.com/article/2026/03/18/tulsi-gabbard-iran-nuclear-trump/

      Fuck off, dickhead.

      Delete
    23. "quibble" dickhead? "quibble" about a cause to start WW3 you fucking fascist cunt?

      This is the 3rd time I am replying to you about that, Iran was not hiding the fact that they 60% enriched. You cannot make a bomb with 60%, dickhead. Before Orange Chickenshit tore up the agreement Obama had with them they were enriching to less than 3 %. What the fuck is wrong with you?

      Delete
    24. @2:49 - Separate two issues
      1. Should we go to war to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons?
      2. If so, when should we do that?

      #1 can certainly be argued either way. For the sake of discussion, let's assume that the answer to #1 is Yes and go on to #2. That is, assume we are totally committed to using military means to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons. What's the best time to attack? I would say the best time is now. Waiting means that Iran would have time to build even more weapons. And, it risks the possibility that unknown to us Iran might get nuclear weapons. In that case, we would have failed in our goal.

      Delete
    25. No. 1 you are a fucking idiot troll.
      No. 2 No.

      Delete
    26. Why are Witkoff and Jared pimping around the mideast asking for $5 Billion in investments instead of negotiating for a peace deal? Where is the US negotiating team of physicists who understand what is involved instead of these two flimflam men? Unqualified money grubbing goons top to bottom. This is what happens when you have a cult running the Government.

      Delete
    27. Jared promised he would never be involved in US government foreign affairs after it was revealed the Saudis dumped $2 000 000 000 in his coffers.

      Delete
    28. Quaker in a BasementMarch 19, 2026 at 4:54 PM

      "They pretty much told us that they would build nuclear weapon unless stopped militar[il]y."

      By you're own account, they didn't say that. They said something, as reported by Steve Witkoff to Sean Hannity, that can be twisted into that--if you squint just right.

      Are you really this credulous, gullible, and incurious? Must be hard for you.

      Delete
    29. Quaker - If you don't think the right time to attack Iran was now, when or under what circumstances do you think we should attack?

      Delete
    30. Stay the fuck away from the comments you fucking fascist freak dickhead,

      Delete
    31. DiC - If you don't think the right time to attack Ireland is now, when or under what circumstances do you think we should attack?

      Delete
    32. How about Switzerland? Is this a good time to attack the Swiss?

      I mean, there was no particular reason for attacking either Venezuela or Iran, right? So if we don't need reasons, how about if we go after Antartica? We could teach those penguins a lesson!

      Delete
    33. George - I guess your comment means the US should not attack Iran. I am sure a lot of people agree with that POV. I respect it. You may be right. The current attacks may turn out to be a mistake.

      The ones I am disappointed in are the people who haven't thought through and figured out what needs to be done, so they just kick the can down the road

      Delete
    34. But you're the one who cheerleads for our bombing the holy hell out of Iran. You must acknowledge that Iran posed no threat to us, because that is the assessment of Trump's intelligence director and his counterterrorism director. So if we're going to obliterate countries that pose no threat, why not Holland?

      Delete
    35. And it's hard for me to believe that Repubs are going with the evergreen "They were thinking about building Weapons of Mass Destruction" justification for yet another war of choice in Asia.

      Delete
    36. Someone invites David to go away and you type abunch of questions inviting him to stay?

      Delete
    37. David in Cal,
      I'd rather focus on our common understanding that you'd still support the self-admitted sexual predator, even if a gallon of gas cost $175, because you crave his bigotry--rather than focus on our differences, like I'm okay with admitting that in public.

      Delete
    38. Quaker in a BasementMarch 20, 2026 at 7:56 AM

      David, Iran had accepted "zero-stockpiling" of enriched uranium during negotiations. Trump attacked anyway.

      https://thehill.com/policy/international/5759623-iran-nuclear-deal-stockpiling/

      Delete
  5. Nick Shirley shamed the mainstream media into finally investigating government corruption. CBS News wrote
    State records show 89 hospice companies at one Los Angeles office plaza. We went to look for ourselves.
    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hospice-fraud-investigation-los-angeles-office-plaza/?ftag=CNM-00-10aab7e&linkId=921434297

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hospices are not illegal. They help dying people and their families.

      Delete
    2. Hospice fraud causes death of people and their families by diverting funds from health care and other programs. Democrats love Hospice fraud.

      Delete
    3. 12:20: It’s republicans who happily elect health care fraudsters. Just ask Rick Scott.

      Delete
    4. 12:20: It’s republicans who happily elect health care fraudsters. Just ask Rick Scott.

      Delete
    5. Quaker in a BasementMarch 19, 2026 at 1:12 PM

      Nick Shirley did squat.

      Delete
    6. If the current version of CBS is mainstream, I am the Czar of Russia

      Delete
    7. Nick Shirley and David are both distracting attention from the latest Epstein news.

      Delete
    8. So is Somerby.

      Delete
    9. The stupidest comment in the history of stupid comments on Somerby's blog: "Hospice fraud causes death of people and their families by diverting funds from health care and other programs. Democrats love Hospice fraud."

      Please do go on. Let us know the sordid details you stupid ass troll.

      Delete
    10. CBS News, huh?
      Was Baghdad Bob not available?

      Delete
  6. Why does Somerby not care about the coverup by the DOJ of Epstein's investigation by the DEA on drug charges? Epstein was guilty of far more than sex trafficking and so is Trump.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. anon 11:51 - what leads you to say that TDH doesn't "care' about this? what makes you think he even knows about it?

      Delete
    2. so far, he has avoided discussing anything about Epstein

      Delete
    3. “what makes you think he even knows about it?”

      Delete
    4. You’re fucking kidding, right AC?

      Delete
    5. anons above - TDH has discussed Epstein to some extent. but why does he have to address it more? It's his blog. No, anon 1:02, I'm not kidding. I follow the news but apparently not in enough detail; I haven't heard about any cover up by the DOJ of a DEA investigation of drug charges concerning Epstein, so can't say that TDH is aware of it himself.

      Delete
    6. It is in the news AC/MA. Also too, there is a thing called the "Google" on the intertubes.

      Delete
    7. You can catch up on the DOJ's suppression of DEA investigation of Epstein's drug activities here:

      https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/march-18-2026

      Delete
    8. I would guess a good chunk of Somerby's commenters -- say 10%-20% -- want to apply to be his assignment editor. They're always telling us what Somerby should really be talking about. (And they usually draw the inference that because he isn't talking about their pet issue, he's a closet foreign agent.)

      Delete
    9. Better trolling DG

      Delete
    10. Asking Somerby to continuously discuss the Epstein Files he's ignoring, makes as much senses as asking the media to discuss "Gutfeld!".

      Delete
  7. BREAKING
    After pressure from President Trump, six American allies just pledged support to secure the Strait of Hormuz shipping lanes

    "That's counter to what they previously said!"

    They are: Japan, Britain, France, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands.

    So sorry Democrats. It appears Americans will be safer thanks to President Trump. Better luck next time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. “Iran war escalation sets key gas sites, and the world's energy prices, ablaze
      American ally Qatar is livid with Iran but also the United States and Israel, a senior official close to its leaders told NBC News. ”

      Thanks, President Trump.

      Delete
    2. When asked by a Japanese reporter why the U.S. didn’t tell allies about attacking Iran prior to the strikes, President Trump responded “Who knows better about surprise better than Japan. Why didn’t you tell me about Pearl Harbor?”

      Never forget Pearl Harbor.

      Delete
    3. Sorry but our Military Industrial Complex has been busy building $50M Predator Drones that are being shot down by cheap missiles and attack drones. We are in no way prepared to fight a drone war as we spend billions in a few big things, instead of spending millions on billions of small things. We should have begged Ukraine for help. We are fucked. We also have 14,000 troops in Qatar and those poor bastards are fucked as well. You can now see the fear in the fucking idiots in charge of this colossal budget busting fuck-up. Congratulations Republicans. Another endless war. USA! USA! USA!

      Delete
    4. The expensive drone f*ckup is bipartisan. The us should have been building affordable drones during Biden's Administrations also. Better late than never, I guess.

      Delete
    5. So why should Trump repeatedly refuse Ukraine's drone help, and say he is OK with Russia killing our soldiers David? And now another endless war - a World War now David. How have you all of a sudden flipped your flop and become all good with this nonsense?

      Delete
    6. "Better late than never, I guess."

      Especially if Trump's sons get paid.

      Delete
    7. @2:21 I commented on this here a couple of weeks ago. Our drones were costing $200 million each, while Ukraine and others built them for a small fraction , maybe $30 million. No doubt our drones were superior, but we were running out of them.

      Delete
    8. "the (six) countries said they would take coordinated steps to stabilise energy markets" and "we express our readiness to contribute to appropriate efforts to ensure safe passage through the Strait."

      Hmmm. A little skimpy on actual details of actual military help to be actually, militarily provided.

      Sounds like another example of what countries constantly do to Trump: issue a vague statement of support that involves no concrete commitment but puts a smile on the man-baby's face.

      Delete
    9. Drones were built during the Biden Admin. AI lists a long series of drone initiatives under Biden, and says:

      "Yes, drones were actively developed, manufactured, and procured during the Biden administration, with a significant emphasis on AI-enabled, low-cost, and "attritable" (expendable) systems for the U.S. military and allies."

      Why do Republicans lie about things like this?

      Delete
    10. David @ 2:35 still a clueless misinformed idiot. Ukraine does not build any drones anywhere near $30M a pop, <$30K you constantly lying POS. Just give it up already. Your boy has simultaneously engaged in an endless world war and has bankrupted our nation morally and financially as directed by Putin, Bibi, and the billionaires boys club. Sadly we all lose because of a committed minority of idiot zealots like you.

      Delete
    11. Who taught David the Dickhead troll the Charlie Kirk arguing formula? Sound sane for a second, and then spray the fucking bullshit all over the place.

      Delete
    12. David in Cal hates war like he hates the deficit and inflation, not like the way he hates when a black person gets a fair shake.

      Delete
  8. James Talarico said it’s “existential” to reduce meat consumption to fight climate change.

    "I am proud to say that our campaign has officially become a non-meat campaign... We are only buying vegan products from our local vegan businesses."

    What a faggot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is this a parody of a right wing troll? Hard to tell.

      Delete
    2. 14:45 My wife and I have been vegan for 37 years, you faggot.

      Delete
  9. A super super majority of House Democrats (186) voted NOT to deport foreigners who commit criminal welfare fraud against the American People.

    All 211 Republicans voted for deporting illegals who steal from the mouths of American children and enslave their parents.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This sounds like a parody too.

      Delete
    2. It is parody. Performance art. Everyone knows that all 211 Republicans are in favor of stealing food from the mouths of American children. In fact, no one has does more to entrench poverty in the US than GOP.

      Delete
    3. What the fuck with 186 House Democrats? Why do you weirdos always make stupid shit up?

      Delete
  10. Once again, too many troll idiots here to discuss anything.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "Thank you, India
    Thank you, terror
    Thank you, disillusionment
    Thank you, frailty
    Thank you, consequence
    Thank you, thank you, silence"

    This is a list of the words "Thank you" followed by words that may mean Morissette but meaning nothing to anyone else out of some context. We do not know her meanings and neither does Somerby but he thinks she has learned something and so should we, from this meaningless list.

    Ooooooh, deeeeeep!

    Somerby is an asshole for suggesting that any of us can learn from something he himself is clueless about, whatever events in Morissette's life made her write such lyrics. Is there value in gratitude. Some psychologists think so, others not so much. Who is being thanked for what? God, maybe. But whose God, given that India is one of the words? There is nothing much to work with in these lyrics when it comes to understanding Morissette, and Somerby tells us nothing either.

    This kind of nonsense is mental masturbation. It is offensive that Somerby should lecture his readers about our learning when he is too cyptic about his own, sharing nothing about why Morissette has anything to do with Gutfeld, Fox lies, and the other topics of today's essay. It is just empty filler accompanied by chiding, as if we readers have no lists of our own.

    This kind of BS is part of why I dislike Somerby so much. I'll bet he doesn't even like Morissette's music.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How about coming here every day just to slag Somerby -- would you call that kind of nonsense "mental masturbation"?

      Delete
    2. What do you come here every day to do? Asking for a friend.

      Delete
    3. DG, what does that Alanis Morissette lyric mean to you?

      Delete
    4. 1:46 - I come here to read Somerby's thoughts and, hopefully, for intelligent comments about his thoughts. Instead, in the comments I'm doused by the daily Bobslapping.

      Delete
    5. So, it means nothing?

      Delete
    6. I come here to read Somerby's thoughts, and then some intelligent thoughts too.

      Delete
  12. For those who thought Biden was not sharp enough to serve another term, here are his remarks at Jesse Jackson's funeral, given extemporaneously. Compare them to any Trump speech. This is the good man we could have had as president, if we hadn't let swiftboating derail his nomination.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/jesse-jackson-funeral-chicago-president-joe-biden-full-remarks/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I blame Somerby, among others.

      Delete
    2. Shh.
      Don't explain Somerby is a Right-wing rat fucker, or you know who will get upset.

      Delete