SATURDAY: Mayor Mamdani spoke with Nawaz!

SATURDAY, MARCH 21, 2026

You know it when you see it: "Presidential timber" is hard to find. You know it when see you see it. 

There are one hundred United States senators. Within the political realm, they're all extremely high achievers. 

Very few of them are real presidential timber. We don't mean that as a criticism.

Last night, we were surprised to see that elusive quality right there on our TV screen. We saw it in someone who's only 34 years old. 

By law, he can't ever run for president. We were surprised to see it, but there it was, unmistakably, right there on the screen.

Amna Nawaz conducted the interview for the PBS NewsHour. The first exchange went like this

NAWAZ (3/20/26): Mr. Mayor, welcome to the News Hour. Thanks for making the time. 

MAYOR MAMDANI: Absolutely. Thank you so much for being here.  

NAWAZ: So let's talk a little bit about your first few months in office. You really had to hit the ground running. You had a lot coming at you too. You had a major nurses strike to handle, a record-breaking snowstorm.

I know you have probably heard the difference between campaigning in poetry, governing in prose. Does that bring true to you? Have you found that to be true?  

MAYOR MAMDANI: I think there's still a little poetry in the day-to-day. I think it's important that we don't let our imagination become constrained by what we are inheriting.

Mamdani's term as mayor on New York could always turn out badly. Also, because he was born in Uganda, he can't ever run for the White House.

That said, you know it when you see it! The smile, the poetry, the look to the future? We were surprised to see that all the key timber was there.

Elsewhere, possibly not so much! Tens of millions of fellow citizens will disagree, but this is the way Chris Hayes began Thursday night's All In program:

HAYES (3/19/26): Good evening from New York. I'm Chris Hayes. 

You know, every once in a while, you just have to remind yourself that the president of the United States is a sociopathor at the very least, being charitable here, he just can't help himself from acting like one.

And that's particularly relevant right now as the man is directing the military might of this nation in yet another war in the Middle East, and that is not going well.  

Is the current sitting president a "likely sociopath?" Hayes floated that notion at least six times as his monologue continued. 

As we've noted, "sociopath" isn't a clinical term. Beyond that, we'd prefer to see this question discussed by (carefully chosen) medical specialistsand we'd rather see any such affliction portrayed as a deeply unfortunate (though dangerous) illness, not as a source of insult or denigration.  

That said, that's where Hayes began on Thursday night. Real Clear Politics transcribed the first several minutes of what he said. You can see fuller videotape at the All In site.

Beyond all that, we're forced to report that Greg Gutfeld, 61 years old, fell off the wagon again last night. For whatever reason, there he went again, opening his program on the Fox News Channel with a "joke" in which he compared Joy Behar to "a hippo." 

Soon thereafter, things got substantially worse. We remain amazed but instructed by the fact that no major journalist in the Blue American firmament thinks this endless cultural swill is worth reporting or discussing. 

Our big Blue stars let this garbage. Our Blue stars, and our Blue orgs, just plainly don't seem to care

Now for the latest postponement! We're going to wait until next week to show you what Gutfeld and Emily Compagno said about James Talarico on Tuesday's edition of The Five

Can Talarico win the Texas Senate seat? We have no idea! But it should have been shocking to see him instantly compared, on the grisly Fox News Channel, to Ted Bundy and David Koresh. 

It should have been shockingbut by now it almost wasn't. 

"At long last," do the people who run that imitation news channel "have left no sense of decency?" And how about the finer people who agree to avert their gaze from this swill?

We'll turn to one quick Q-and-A from last evening's NewsHour. As a bit of background, Amna Nawaz was born and raised in the state of Virginia, the daughter of South Asian immigrants:

NAWAZ: I have to ask you about your family before I let you go, because I think anyone familiar with the specific and what I would say very fortunate experience of being raised by Desi parents, South Asian parents, especially those with the courage and the hope to forge an entirely new life in new nations, you know that you can learn a lot from them.

MAYOR MAMDANI: Yes.

So the mayor said. We thought of that favorite passage from My Antoniathe passage in which Willa Cather's gender-switched narrator is discussing the Nebraska "immigrant girls" for whom Cather, in real life, had a lifelong high regard:

My Antonia: Book II, Section IX

There was a curious social situation in Black Hawk. All the young men felt the attraction of the fine, well-set-up country girls who had come to town to earn a living, and, in nearly every case, to help the father struggle out of debt, or to make it possible for the younger children of the family to go to school.

Those girls had grown up in the first bitter-hard times, and had got little schooling themselves. But the younger brothers and sisters, for whom they made such sacrifices and who have had ‘advantages,’ never seem to me, when I meet them now, half as interesting or as well educated. The older girls, who helped to break up the wild sod, learned so much from life, from poverty, from their mothers and grandmothers; they had all, like Ántonia, been early awakened and made observant by coming at a tender age from an old country to a new.

They had learned so much from poverty! Has a more beautifully crafted statement ever been placed in print?

And yes, we'll admit it again. Yesterday, we took Francine Prose's book to the medical mission, where there's a lot of sitting around. 

We hadn't reread it in several years. We could spend weeks writing about every page in the parts of the book where Prose discusses who the real Anne Frank actually was:

("A demanding and often sickly baby, Anne grew into a challenging child—mercurial, moody, humorous, alternately outgoing and shy." Also, though, a much-loved, precocious child who was a gifted, determined young writer.)

Also, the parts of the book in which in which Prose discusses the remarkably complex way Anne Frank's famous book actually came to be written. 

Also, the part of the book in which Prose describes the serendipity thanks to which the famous writing in question wasn't carried away and discarded by the people who arrested Anne Frank, along with her parents and her older sister, Margot Frank. (Only her father survived.)

Postponing the torture of transcribing the latest statements of the Fox News Channel Two, we'll leave you today with Prose's description of the one tiny bit of film which remainsa piece of film which can be seen, even today, right there for the whole world to see on YouTube:

A FLICKER of a home movie. June 22, 1941. The whole thing lasts ten seconds.

The bicycles slipping by provide the only indication that we are in Holland. The brick Merwedeplein apartment block looks more like married students’ housing on an American state university campus than the quaint center-city canal houses we associate with Amsterdam.

The camera waits outside a door, peering up a stairwell. In search of something to focus on, it pans up the side of a building. In the open windows are neighborhood residents, girls and young women, their elbows propped on the sills, waiting. The women at the windows alter the look of the street, so the scene begins to look more like a village in southern Europe.

The newlywed couple appears, arm in arm, the groom in a top hat, cane, and formal wear, the bride in a flattering pale suit, a jaunty white fedora, and gloves; she carries a bouquet. They walk down the stairs and pause like movie stars obliging the paparazzi. Passersby lean against their bicycles, staring.

Suddenly, the camera zooms toward the sky and finds Anne Frank, watching from her window. She turns and speaks to someone inside the apartment. She looks back at the couple, then away. The camera appears to lose interest. It glances at a few more spectators, then returns to the Amsterdam street.

On the Web site for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, you can watch those few seconds of Anne on film, in blurred and grainy close-up. Anne’s body language is quick, electric. A breeze, or maybe the motion of her body, lifts her hair as she turns, and her eyes smudge into dark ovals as she gazes down at the bridal couple.

As familiar as we are with images of Anne Frank, as inured as we may think we are to the sight of her beautiful face, the film pierces whatever armor we imagine we have developed. It is always shockingly short and always the same, and yet you are never entirely sure what you have, or haven’t, seen. It’s less like watching a film clip than like having one of those dreams in which you see a long-lost loved one or friend. In the dream, the person isn’t really dead. You must have been mistaken. You wake up, and it takes a few moments to understand why the dream was so cruelly deceptive.

We're with Prose every word of the way. We regard that as sacred film, sacred film of a sacred being.

Anne Frank is so viewed in certain cultures around the world. But what could possibly make us think that she was, or that she is, some sort of "sacred being?"

We'll admit that you're asking a very good question. You know it when you see it, we'll thoughtfully say. Though we don't see it much around here!

For today, we chose to stay with Prose and Anne Frank. Ted Bundy, David Koresh?  

Fellow citizens, thank you for asking! We'll present that disaster next week, Blue American silence included.


33 comments:

  1. "As we've noted, "sociopath" isn't a clinical term. Beyond that, we'd prefer to see this question discussed by (carefully chosen) medical specialists—and we'd rather see any such affliction portrayed as a deeply unfortunate (though dangerous) illness, not as a source of insult or denigration. "

    With these words, Somerby absolves Trump of responsibility for his actions. Why? Because illnesses are not chosen, they happen to a person. And because insult and denigration are withheld from people who cannot help themselves for what they do. But is this true of Trump?

    We all have a personality and a set of innate characteristics with which we are born. Then life happens to us and our experiences mold us. But we also learn and we have the ability to control our actions and choose how we will cope with our circumstances. There is no one who cannot make their lives better or worse through those choices. We can and do hold people responsible for what they do in the face of their own life's challenges.

    But Somerby doesn't want to do that with Trump. He accepts whatever Trump does as illness and he argues that we should pity Trump, not try to protect our nation from his bad choices, his wrongdoing, his criminal activity and his mistakes. Somerby wants a doctor to get on TV and explain to us all why Trump is not to be held to account for what he does to us. And worse, Somerby does not believe we should try to do anything to remove Trump, to prevent him from starting unnecessary wars, spending money foolishly and hurting immigrants. There is no logic to this. It makes no sense at all. And I do hold Somerby responsible for the things he says here. His approach to Trump is very wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby has already written many times that we are stuck with Trump, because every Republican voter is a gigantic bigot. What more do you need him to say about the pieces of shit on the Right?

      Delete
    2. Having us listen to "the Others", and report back how they are as racist as fuck, is when Somerby realized all Republican voters are bigots.
      Before then, Bob was in denial about who they are.

      Delete
  2. Somerby has decided he likes Mamdani. He quotes some stuff Mamdani said, but I don't see anything special or unusual, much less presidential, in what Somerby has quoted here. I suppose there is some element of charisma that doesn't come across in words on a screen. If so, I think Somerby should be careful -- charisma has nothing to do with the thoughtful judgment, wisdom, intelligence and expertise that a person brings to the presidency.

    Trump has charisma for many of his supporters. Has that made him a good president? Absolutely not. It has fooled people into thinking Trump has the ability needed to run our country, when he plainly does not.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Anne Frank is so viewed in certain cultures around the world. But what could possibly make us think that she was, or that she is, some sort of "sacred being?"

    We'll admit that you're asking a very good question. You know it when you see it, we'll thoughtfully say. Though we don't see it much around here!"

    There is nothing sacred about being a victim. There is nothing sacred about being 13 years old either. If we are lucky, we all grow past that age and get on with our lives. Anne Frank was unlucky to be Jewish in a place of war. There are children in that same situation today, including those girls at that Iranian school. Somerby spares no thoughts for them today, or he might have been more outraged at Trump's careless bombing. That war is no more justified than Hitler's was, with its targeting of Jews as scapegoats. Trump's scapegoats are immigrants and brown people who own oil that he covets. Or maybe Trump is just doing this to help out Putin. Whatever his reasons, Somerby should focus on today's atrocities. There is nothing he can do for Anne Frank today except make Prose a little wealthier by selling her book.

    People are suffering today because of Trump and Somerby is too busy mooning over Anne Frank to consider their plight. Whatta guy our Somerby is!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Someone explain this constant preoccupation with a thirteen year old girl.

      Delete
  4. It's super easy to get people to deny the existence of climate change. All you need is red state governors begging Daddy Federal Government to bail them out from bad weather.
    Works like a charm.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Somerby, if you're listening, please don't talk about Ted Bundy or David Koresh again. They have nothing to do with anything and you don't know how to discuss their mental illness or their criminality. Are you even aware that most mentally ill people do not become criminals? They suffer pain and need treatment.

    If you want to focus on criminals, how about talking about Pam Bondi's pathology, or what is wrong with Kristi Noem, or Pete Hegseth's similarity to Brett Kavanaugh, or Epstein's pathology (is there such a thing as a sex addict?), or Melania's mental illness? Is it criminal to get in so deep with Russian oligarch's that you wind up money laundering and owing the rest of your life to them? Was it Trump's charisma that let others manipulate him into the presidency to the point where he is now enriching billionaires and facilitating huge corruption that our country will spend decades rooting out? Is all that too much for you to think about, that you come back day after day to dote on Anne Frank?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I never appreciated Biden before he was elected and could show his talent for governing. He doesn't have charisma, apart from appearing to be a good man. He did know what to do to help our country through covid. That is worth a great deal more to me (and our country) than whatever it is that attracts Somerby to Mamdani or Trump. Perhaps we should switch to a system where presidential candidates take a written test, instead of telling stories about serpents and Hannibal Lecter in front of crowds wearing red hats and adult diapers (outside their clothes)?

    Mamdani may have potential but he hasn't had the chance to show what he can do by governing yet. Newson has served as governor of CA (now the 4th largest economy in the world) for eight years. He is showing that he can resist Trump and do what is best for his state, filing lawsuits but also speaking truth to Trump's insanity and resisting the troops that Trump sent to harrass the people of Los Angeles and Sacramento.

    Unlike Somerby, I respect action not words. And unlike Mamdani, Newsom is elegible to run for president. I don't agree with every one of his positions, but I can tell competence when I see it, and that is worth a whole lot more than charisma.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why is Somerby touting someone who cannot run for president, after showing little support for our actual candidates during the past 3 elections?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Now Somerby is complaining because Blue America doesn't talk about Ted Bundy enough? This is getting bizarre.

    ReplyDelete
  9. There are quite a few surviving diaries of teens who experienced the Holocaust or lived in Nazi Germany under Hitler but there are also books by adults in the same circumstances. Reading one of these shows a stark difference between the diary of Anne Frank and an adult experience. Diaries by teens include:

    Helga's Diary: A Young Girl's Account of Life in a Concentration Camp by Helga Weiss: Documents her journey through four Nazi concentration camps with her mother.

    The Diary of Petr Ginz, 1941-1942: Chronicles the experiences of a teenage boy before his deportation to Auschwitz.

    Rywka's Diary: Written by Rywka Lipszyc, a Jewish girl in the Łódź Ghetto, found at Auschwitz and published decades later.

    Anthony Acevedo's Diary: Detailed records kept by a POW in the Berga slave labor camp.

    Other notable diaries include those by Rutka Laskier, Renia Spiegel, and Dawid Rubinowicz.

    Elie Wiesel's "Night," about his camp experiences and Viktor Frankl's "Man's Search for Meaning," and Primo Levi's "Survival in Auschwitz" are important books by adult Holocaust survivors.

    Anne Frank's diary gained such attention because of its promotion by her father, who survived her. There was an Anne Frank industry, encouraged by making her diary required reading in US schools.

    But Anne Frank was no more sacred than any of the others who wrote books or who died in the camps. This is why Somerby's obsession with her comes across as creepy. His focus is on the girl, not the atrocities, not the coping as Frankl's was, not the suffering as Wiesel's was. Teen girls do not exist for men to crush on, the way Somerby does. Anne Frank's death is a lesson about mistreatment of people, including children. Given that the mistreatment is being repeated now in our own country in the ICE detention camps, and that it may escalate to include political prisoners if Trump gets his way, without Somerby saying a single word about such possibilities, is outrageous.

    Exaggerating Frank's talent compounds the atrocity. She was not a young Jane Austen. We have surviving novels written by Austen for comparison. Many girls keep diaries. With time on her hands, it is not a wonder that Frank did too. But calling her sacred instead of tragic is creepy. All children are sacred to their parents. This Holocaust was evil. So is Somerby's refusal to look at what is happening to teens and children in our own ICE detention facilities. Those people are describing their experiences but Somerby doesn't care about them. How do we know that? He hasn't talked about it at all.

    I am sorry Anne Frank didn't live to adulthood. She would likely have died by now, as many Holocaust survivors have done, after their immigration to the US and other places. Somerby does not honor that immigrant experience or respect the difficulties of those fleeing Nazi Germany who were refused entrance to the US. Talk about averting eyes! It is sickening that Somerby gushes over Frank while holding such negative views about immigrants in general and refusing to help today's saints and martyrs. He should be ashamed.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Our big Blue stars let this garbage. Our Blue stars, and our Blue orgs, just plainly don't seem to care [about Gutfeld calling Joy Behar a hippo]"

    Does Somerby seriously think we in Blue America are going to call for government interference in media, abrogation of first amendment rights under our constitution, suppression of an asshole like Gutfeld for being an asshole? We aren't the right wing. We believe in individual freedom, even to call an innocent woman an African animal. We don't believe in that.

    We on the left do not condone what Gutfeld is doing. We show our opposition by refusing to watch Fox News. Somerby should do the same, if he truly cares about Behar's right to be whatever weight she wants (her body, her choice). I do not speak for the blues or left (obviously), but it is entirely inconsistent for Somerby to call for whatever he thinks we are not doing. He doesn't say what he thinks we should do, so it is unclear what action he is advocating. I suppose he wants blue media to talk about Gutfeld's bad behavior 24/7. If we did that, there would be no time left to report actual news. I think it is more important to get the word out about other stuff. There are way too many obnoxious and ugly people on the right, for blue news to talk about them all. And it would get tedious pretty quickly. Somerby's repetitive nonsense here is already tedious itself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I doubt Behar cares what Gutfeld says about her.

      Delete
  11. Thanks to TV, people with a certain type of aura or presence are regarded as "Presidential." People without that aura are not. Unfortunately a leadership aura may not correlate with the characteristics we most need from a leader: judgement, intelligence, knowledge, motivation, goo work habits. Hillary had these valuable characteristics but lacked the aura.

    It's great for Mamdani that he comes across so well on TV, but he has so far shown no achievements that would measure his actual ability.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "...another war in the Middle East, and that is not going well." Not going well? Of course, it's going well. In less than three weeks we destroyed the enemy's entire navy, air force, and air defenses. We destroyed 90% of their missiles, missile launchers and drones. We weakened their ability to manufacture weapons and killed many top leaders. With only a couple of dozen casualties on our side.

    Sadly, the left has such control over our media and institutions that they can present obvious falsehood and have them regarded as unquestionably true.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Go take a flying fuck, dickface

      Delete
  13. Speaking of false statements that are treated as gospel, @10:36 wrote, "People are suffering today because of Trump." On the contrary most Americans are better off, because their wages grew faster than inflation, for the first time in several years. Also, they're paying less income tax. There is no especial suffering.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How many people are suffering compared to how many are better off? Saying there is no suffering at all is ridiculous and shows David is not a serious person.

      Delete
    2. "Also, they're paying less income tax."

      That's our DiC. Terrified at the prospect of deficits when it suits his purpose, but roots them on when it doesn't.

      Delete
    3. Yep, no “especial” suffering. Everybody has great, affordable healthcare, just like Trump promised them 10 years ago.

      Delete
    4. The midterms and ongoing approval ratings for Trump will tell us how well the US populace is doing. The fact that he does better with the elderly is in large part attributable to their support by what republicans call socialist programs.

      Delete
    5. The “Ive got mine, fuck you” mentality of the generation that has continually heaped burdens on their successors and done nothing about the major issues confronting this country, while supporting war after war and skyrocketing deficits is what is in process of ruining this country. The sooner they disappear the better.

      Delete
    6. I anticipate a big Dem victory in the mid term elections. Trump is totally focused on making the country a better place. The Dems are totally focused on demonizing Trump and winning the election. I expect both sides to get what they're working for.

      Delete
    7. Trump is totally focused on making the country a better place for Russian oligarchs.

      Fixed for accuracy.

      Delete
    8. You’re an imbecile, dickface. You think democrats want the country to continue suffering under trump? Every right wing accusation is a confession. That’s what you guys did yo Obama and Biden

      Delete
    9. @1:53 - The Dems are focused on resisting Trump rather than making people's lives better. That's why there are 3 hour lines at airport TSA.

      Delete
    10. Sure Dickhead

      Delete
    11. It’s just a coincidence that there’s been more government shutdown days under orange chickenshit than under all other presidents combined. Cause orange chickenshit is such a great deal maker. Fuck you, dickface

      Delete
  14. "MAYOR MAMDANI: I think there's still a little poetry in the day-to-day. I think it's important that we don't let our imagination become constrained by what we are inheriting."

    Somerby just likes him because he mentioned poetry.

    ReplyDelete
  15. "... we'd rather see any such affliction portrayed as a deeply unfortunate (though dangerous) illness, not as a source of insult or denigration."

    Boo-fuckin'-hoo.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "The earnings gap between men and women slightly widened last year, according to a new analysis published Thursday.

    The left-leaning Economic Policy Institute calculated women last year earned 18.6% less than men per hour on average. That’s up slightly from 2024, when the wage gap narrowed slightly to 18%.

    The wage analysis, which examines several federal data sets and independent research papers, controls for race, ethnicity, education, age, marital status and geography.

    The findings were published ahead of Equal Pay Day on March 26, a symbolic date marking how far into 2026 women would have to work on top of their 2025 hours to match what men earned in 2025.

    The new analysis found the wage gap is smallest among lower-wage workers, in part because minimum wages create a uniform wage floor. But women are paid less than men across all education levels — women with a graduate degree on average earn less than men with only a college degree, it said.

    The analysis found the widest wage gap among Black and Hispanic women: Black women are paid only 68.3% of white men’s median wages. That’s a gap of $9.87 per hour — translating to roughly $20,500 lower annual earnings for a full-time worker. " [Colorado Newsline]

    ReplyDelete
  17. In one week, people across the country will gather for No Kings rallies because the actions of this administration have crossed lines that cannot be ignored, minimized, or allowed to become normal.

    Over the past year, Republicans and Donald Trump have escalated their efforts to consolidate power, restrict who gets to vote, target vulnerable communities, and rewrite the rules ahead of the 2026 elections because they know their agenda is deeply unpopular and one they cannot win on.

    That is exactly why this moment demands a visible, collective response that cannot be ignored.

    Find a No Kings rally near you and make a plan to attend on March 28. >>

    https://www.mobilize.us/?tag_ids=29581&utm_source=peoplefortheamericanway

    ReplyDelete