FRANK: Gutfeld and Watters were at it again!

MONDAY, JUNE 1, 2026

But also, Barney Frank: Are maggots frequently found in the food at the Delaney Hall Detention Center, right there on the outskirts of Newark? 

Are they found in the food there at all? At this site, we can't necessarily tell you. That said:

Last Thursday, CBS News seemed to report that three United States congressmen had said that's what they saw:

Protests over inhumane conditions at ICE facility Delaney Hall in Newark become violent

[...]

A congressional delegation from New York and New Jersey Sen. Corey Booker visited Delaney Hall earlier Wednesday. They said they observed dire conditions, including a pregnant women not getting the proper medical care.

"This is a moral stain on who we hope to be and profess to be. It is a complete indictment of the president who lied to us about how he was going to conduct his immigration policies," Booker said.

Advocates say detainees inside have been on a hunger strike for almost a week. The Department of Homeland Security denies a strike is happening inside.

Maggots in the food?

Congressmen Adriano Espaillat, Dan Goldman, and Jerry Nadler say they observed a lack of medical treatment and small portions of food that very often contained maggots.

And so on from there.

According to CBS, three congressmen said they'd seen maggots in the food.  In fairness, none of the three was directly quoted. But that's what it seemed they had said.

The congressional reps had inspected the detention center on Wednesday. The following day, on The Five, Greg Gutfeld said he doesn't care if maggots are found in the food.

"Who cares if there are maggots?" the gentleman thoughtfully said. "Who cares if [detainees] don't like the food?" Jesse Watters soon added.

Citizens, can we talk?

Presumably, some people do care if there are maggots in the food. Also, it seems that some others don't. 

For now, let's stick to the factual question:

Are there maggots in the food at the Delaney Hall facility? And did the three congressmen actually say that that's what they actually saw?

Are there maggots in the food? And what was the source of that claim? In its own report about this matter, the Associated Press offered this:

Congress members say conditions dire at NJ detention center facing protests, reported hunger strike

Democratic members of Congress on Wednesday said they observed dire conditions within a federal immigration detention center in New Jersey where protesters have been demonstrating for days and asserting that detainees are on a hunger strike.

U.S. Rep. Jerry Nadler, a Manhattan Democrat, said detainees at Delaney Hall in Newark are being given small portions of food that “very often” contain maggots and that the only medication they receive is Tylenol.

One woman, he said, had a lump in her breast but was still waiting on a mammogram more than a month into her detention. Another detainee was suffering from colon cancer but wasn’t receiving any treatment.

“The bottom line is, if you are human, if you are American, you cannot support what is going on here,” said U.S. Rep. Dan Goldman, another Manhattan Democrat who toured the facility Wednesday. “They’re living in jail conditions, and none of these people are criminals.”

In this AP report, Rep. Nadler was cited as the lone source of the specific claim. And as with CBS, so too here:

Nadler wasn't directly quoted. Was he reporting his own observation, or had he merely been told? The AP didn't report the source of the congressman's claim.

What did congressmen actually see when they were inside the center? Gutfeld said he doesn't care if there are maggots in the food, but as of this morning, five days later, it isn't clear that major mainstream news orgs care about this either.

Using Google as well as the paper's search engine, we find no sign that the New York Times has ever reported this claim. In fact, we find no sign that the Times or the Wall Street Journal has ever reported last Wednesday's congressional visit at all.

Are there maggots in the food? Did one (or three) congressmen say as much? Did they observe this with their own eyes, or had they merely been told?   

We start with this question today because of what we saw on The Five when the godforsaken ersatz news program pretended to discuss the maggots on two successive programs.   

First on Thursday, then on Friday, the corporate buffoons who people this program offered their reactions to the report in question. Not long ago, the sheer stupidity put on display on Friday's program would have been hard to picture within the American news firmament.

In the next few days, we'll show you what Gutfeld and Watters said on Thursday, the again the next day. A key point:

According to the world's major experts, a nation which accepts such brain death as part of news culture has already become a failed state.   

The garbage can sold by the Fox News Channel rarely fails to amaze. It's an artefact of Red American corporate messaging cultureand The Five, as you well know, boasts an audience which almost triples the size of the typical MS NOW prime time audience.   

For a person who wants to leave a published record on How It Happened for the generations to follow, it's hard to avert one's gaze from the undermining of the culture which takes place on the Fox News Channel. 

That said, there's also this:

On May 20, just twelve days ago, the New York Times reported the death of Barney Frank. We're going to show you the dual headline, plus part of the way the lengthy report began:

Barney Frank, Gay Pioneer and Liberal Stalwart in Congress, Dies at 86
Often voted the “brainiest,” “funniest” and “most eloquent” member of the House, he was also the first to come out voluntarily and helped normalize being openly gay in public office.

Barney Frank, the brassy, lightning-quick former Massachusetts representative who for decades was the most prominent gay politician in the country and who was an author of the most significant overhaul of the nation’s financial regulations since the Great Depression, died on Tuesday at his home in Ogunquit, Maine. He was 86.

His friend James Segel confirmed the death. Mr. Frank said last month that he had entered hospice care with congestive heart failure.

Mr. Frank, a liberal Democrat who represented a diverse suburban Boston district for 32 years, starting in 1981, was the first gay member of the House to come out voluntarily; others had been outed in scandals. His public declaration of his sexual orientation in 1987—spurred by a fear of being outed, by the death of a closeted colleague and by his own determination to show that homosexuality was nothing to be ashamed of—helped normalize being openly gay in public life.

He was "an author of the most significant overhaul of the nation’s financial regulations since the Great Depression." He was also the first gay member of the House to come out.

(One commenter comments here: "He saved many lives of gay young people because of his honesty. It took courage and it saved lives.so rare these days.")

No one ever doubted that Rep. Frank was extremely sharp. The Times obit went on at great length. As it ended, it offered this recent point:
As Mr. Frank was entering hospice care in late April, he had just finished writing a book, “The Hard Path to Unity.” Its premise was that the political left, of which he was a member in good standing, had sometimes gone too far in pushing divisive causes...

Slow down, he advised, and find common ground. Rather than focusing on cultural flash points, build support with something practical; instead of demanding Medicare for all, for example, start by reducing the age of Medicare eligibility.

Too frail to travel, he nevertheless happily spoke with interviewers about what he had written, and said he was pleased that the book’s message was having some resonance.
“Frankly,” he told The Times, “if I weren’t dying, people wouldn’t be paying as much attention.”
That's what he'd recently said.

The inanity of Red American corporate messaging was on display again last week. Quite recently, Frank had been saying that we Blues have sometimes made extremely large mistakes.

He said we Blues have made large mistakes! What could this very important figure possibly have meant by that? 

Tomorrow: Watters, equipped with the menus

15 comments:

  1. CBS News reports:

    "Congressmen Adriano Espaillat, Dan Goldman, and Jerry Nadler say they observed a lack of medical treatment and small portions of food that very often contained maggots."

    Somerby says:

    "Are they found in the food there at all? At this site, we can't necessarily tell you."

    Is Somerby actually saying that he doesn't believe reporting of politician statements, when quoted? Does he not believe those politicians said what they said? On what basis does he dispute their statements?

    If Somerby cannot believe that an elected official said what he or she is quoted as saying, how can he discuss anything at all that is reported in our mainstream press? He cannot go on and discuss maggots when he won't even believe the words a politician is reported to have said.

    "According to CBS, three congressmen said they'd seen maggots in the food. In fairness, none of the three was directly quoted. But that's what it seemed they had said." However Cory Booker was directly quoted by CBS. Just not specifically about maggots. So Somerby's complaint is a bit misleading.

    Do there have to be maggots in order for unacceptable conditions to exist at the NJ detention center? I don't think so. But why does Somerby question the veracity of what these men said? He has no proof they are lying and no cause even for suspicion. Playing a game of questioning whatever isn't directly quoted means the men would have to have been quoted in full, which is not generally possible in news media due to space constraints.

    Somerby stance that nothing can be known for sure undermines his attempts here to discuss anything meaningful. Beyond that, how do we know for sure what Gutfeld actually said? Yes, there is video available, but that can always be manipulated in our day of deep fakes and editing. How do we discuss Gutfeld when he only seems to be saying things?

    And then Somerby has the nerve to imply that the dying Barney Frank agreed with anything Somerby has said. I care about Barney Frank, I admired him and voted for him. Somerby has no right to use his memory this way.

    It is time for Somerby to hang up his own spurs. If he cannot believe anything said by media, he cannot function as a media critic. We do not need an apologist for the worst president in history, much less another asshole promoting Gutfeld. Why doesn't Somerby take down this worthless blog and toddle down to his local senior center, where he can rant at will and might find someone who will agree with him.

    For that matter, how do we discuss Somerby? He only seems to be saying things himself. If we quote him, how do we know what he meant?

    This has to be the stupidest game on the planet.

    Last Thursday, CBS News seemed to report that three United States congressmen had said that's what they saw..."

    Why discuss anything at all if all is illusion? Because Somerby has a purpose here. He wants to undermine public faith in all media except Gutfeld. He wants us to disbelieve the stuff we read, especially when describing Trump's malfeasance in caring for detainees in his camps. We are supposed to suspend belief in anything negative we read about Republican failures. He wants us to think Cory Booker may be a liar, CBS too, because it chose to quote Dan Goldman's remark that people were living in jail conditions without being criminals instead of Nadler's exact words about maggots. That is called editorial discretion and the point is the incarceration not the maggots.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "He wants to undermine public faith in all media except Gutfeld."

      Stupidest comment of the year.

      Delete
  2. " Quite recently, Frank had been saying that we Blues have sometimes made extremely large mistakes."

    Where does it say in the quote of Barney Frank's words that we Blues have made "extremely large" mistakes? I see him saying that we might make more progress by slowing down and being less divisive, but where does he talk about mistakes at all, much less extremely large ones?

    Somerby seems to be putting words into Frank's mouth, which is generally frowned upon when it comes to dead people who can no longer correct the record by defending themselves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somerby’s analyses never make sense.

      But Frank also seems a bit out of touch; his incrementalism lacks the mobilization impact required by electoral politics, and the notion that “common ground” can be found with Republicans lacks credibility.

      Delete
    2. Common ground with Republicans is a huge joke. Look at the bipartisan immigration reform legislation Biden worked out with the House, only to have it nixed by Trump and abandoned by Republicans before it could go up for a vote. Republicans under Trump are not capable of negotiating any changes in good faith.

      Delete
    3. Republicans are incapable of governing -

      Delete
  3. Have the Republicans gone too far in demanding the release of Tina Peters, to the point where the Democratic Governor Polis of CO commuted her sentence under duress? Her own town of Grand Junction doesn't want her back there and even Colorado Republicans are upset with her acts. The governor's action is a unifying act -- it has unified right and left against him and Peters, but it has also gone too far. Obviously someone can also go too far in unifying people, not just in divisiveness.

    Maybe we should be looking at our actions in a different frame. What is good for people, what is moral or ethical or kind or helpful to our communities, what helps us toward our goals, what makes us a better people. Unity as a goal is empty if you do not consider unity toward some purpose that is worthwhile in itself. It is understandable that Frank would think about political goals such as winning elections, but if we sacrifice our adherence to principles and let go of important Democratic values, we may win without having accomplished the progress our party aspires to create.

    Any one of us can take a step toward unity by joining MAGA, buying a red cap and a RUMP watch. It might feel good to have supporters around us who also voted for our cruddy president, but beyond that what would we be accomplishing? Does anyone believe that adding Democrats to the extreme right wing is going to make those detention camps go away? The govt has already invested in buying them, so they are certainly going to use them, even if we are there in MAGAland on the fringes urging Trump to slow down and seek unity ourselves.

    What does Somerby gain by promoting this message telling us Blues to back off and slow down? I hope he is well paid by his right wing handler because he will be the only one who gains by this fatuous message from a politician who thinks less woke would have gained more votes rather than repelling the already disgusted lefties who think our party sold out and make an extremely large mistake by abandoning Biden and Kamala, moving too slowly to prosecute Trump (Merrick Garland's fault) and tolerating Trump's corruption in office.

    The low approval ratings of the Democratic party are not due to too much woke but due to the failure of Democrats to oppose Trumpism.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Tone Police Officer Somerby, walking his beat, oblivious to all the actual crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. They showed pictures of the small portions. Does it matter if they come with maggots or not? No one has proven the portions don't come with maggots, so it seems premature to imply that the congressmen were lying, especially when Somerby cannot quote them saying maggots were present. So what exactly is the point? Does Somerby think he can discredit all of the criticisms of detention by showing the claim of maggots was exaggerated? Is he justifying the detainment or trying to say it isn't really that bad?

    Would Somerby want to eat that food himself? That's more to the point. It is the nature of being a detainee that they HAVE NO FUCKING CHOICE about what they eat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are numerous news reports about detainees in these concentration camps describing maggots in their food from all over the country, and for some time, that’s part of why they are going on hunger strikes like at the facility in NJ.

      Somerby ignores that to push his right wing agenda.

      Delete
  6. Republican men come in two main varieties: those that engage in sexual predation, and those that live on the down low.

    These categories are not mutually exclusive.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "In this AP report, Rep. Nadler was cited as the lone source of the specific claim. "

    How many sources are needed? Is Nadler's word not good enough for Somerby?

    There have been similar reports at other ICE detention centers, such as Farmville Detention Center in Virginia:

    https://nipnlg.org/news/press-releases/new-reports-rotten-food-worms-farmville-detention-center

    Tacoma Washington:

    https://jsis.washington.edu/humanrights/2020/03/27/nwdc-sanitation-of-food-laundry/

    Laredo Texas:

    https://www.adn.com/nation-world/2026/03/01/worms-in-food-poor-medical-care-lights-on-247-families-tell-of-life-in-texas-detention-center/

    At Alligator Alcatraz in FL:

    https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/national-international/detained-immigrants-alligator-alcatraz-say-worms-in-food-wastewater-on-floor/3866748/

    Some of these reports include photos of maggots in food. Because of the variety of places this has occurred it suggests that procedures are either deficient or not being followed in these facilities.

    Given the abundance of evidence supporting these claims (read the articles), Somerby's idiotic doubting of the inspection in NJ strikes me as politically motivated, not skepticism.

    ReplyDelete
  8. How would Somerby like to eat food with maggots? If such a charge were being leveled by someone with Nadler's stature, shouldn't there be further investigation?

    ReplyDelete
  9. At first it seemed like Trump was being clever in criticizing Talarico for being vague, but no it turns out Trump doesn’t know how to pronounce “vegan”.

    I guess coming from the guy that thinks you need an ID to buy bread at the grocery store, that’s very on brand.

    Turns out Talarico is not a vegan but his hot girlfriend is, sending Republicans into a tizzy.

    ReplyDelete

  10. The cruelty is the point.

    For those interested, The Majority Report with Sam Seder will be covering the ICE crisis in NJ today at noon as well as the crimes against humanity this country is committing on Cuba as we speak. Why does a Cuban immigrant like little Marco get the right to torture the poor people living in Cuba now?

    ReplyDelete