FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2026
Republican voters choose Donalds: "These are the days of miracle and wonder?"
Paul Simon said it long ago. It was a key take-away from his Graceland album, (in part) an album about the miracle of worldwide human connection.
Could that statement be true today? The New York Times has imagined just that, in a lengthy report by Jess Bidgood which starts exactly like this:
Blue Texas? Battleground Kansas? Both Parties Wonder if the Map Has Shifted.
Texas. Kansas. Mississippi.
Democrats’ surprising midterm victories in states that had long seemed out of reach for them have dangled a fundamental question in front of both parties, one with major implications for the 2028 presidential election and maybe for the country’s understanding of itself: Could America’s political map, long defined by tribalism and calcification, be changing?
Since the Obama era, just seven states have really been battlegrounds in presidential elections. In the Senate, red-state Democrats and blue-state Republicans became endangered species. State lawmakers narrowed the amount of competitive House seats through redistricting. The nation was dug in.
But this year, seven of Democrats’ eight Senate flips have come in states that their party has not won in a presidential election since 2012. In another historically red state, Alaska, the Democrat is narrowly ahead but the race is uncalled. Democrats flipped House seats in districts President Trump won by more than 15 percentage points two years ago. They won every statewide office in Texas, broke the Republican gerrymander of North Carolina and even won two statewide races in deep-red Indiana.
Has the (political) map of America shifted? In the text of her essay, Bidgood mentioned Mississippi only once, right there in the opening line shown above. Almost surely, Scott Colom's historic win in that state's Senate race hadn't been decided or declared when Bidgood created her text.
Has the map of America changed? Has Texas turned blue? Have we moved on to Battleground Kansas?
In the most astounding question of all, has Mississippi turned purple? We're going to guess that the answer is no, for a fairly obvious reason:
Senator-elect Colom dared to struggle and dared to win, but he narrowly beat a stunningly unskilled incumbent in a very unusual year. The political backdrop of this year involved the endless bizarre behavior of a sitting president who is mentally ill in an untreated way—bizarre behavior which was so relentless that it surely drove many voters away from the Red American team.
That bizarre behavior isn't likely to stop, nor is it likely that Blue America's upper end press corps will ever be willing to discuss the fairly obvious medical source of that endless, unhinged conduct.
No one knows where his (untreated) disorders will take us. We note this report, for example:
Trump Says He Wants to Get Cuba ‘Done’ Before Leaving Office
President Donald Trump told conservative commentator Hugh Hewitt that he’s not ruling out military intervention to accomplish regime change in Cuba.
“I want to get Cuba done before I leave,” Trump told Hewitt in a phone call on Thursday.
“And we have a very good, talented guy for Cuba named Marco, because Marco’s parents are from—Marco Rubio—his parents are from Cuba, as you probably know and he would love to do that,” Trump continued. “So we’re watching it very closely. It’s doing very poorly. It’s essentially a failed, you know place, nation, whatever you want to call it.”
“It’s failed and we’re watching it. I would like to be able to do it. I won the Cuban vote by 94% in Florida and I think I’m more popular now than I was then and, frankly, I’d love to be able to do it..."
And so on from there. o, we aren'''t making that up.
For the medical reason cited above, the person in question will almost surely never come to realize that his judgment and instincts are disastrously poor. He thought Iran would be a snap, and he'll likely feel the same way about Cuba.
Domestic turmoil would likely follow as we head toward November 2028. Back to the Magnolia State:
Senator Colom, who dared to struggle, won by only one point. If we ever escape the force field of a president who is mentally ill, that fact suggests that Mississippi will still be a Republican state, if we ever make it that far.
For right now, consider this. Once again, consider the passage which opened Jia Lynn Yang's news analysis in that same New York Times:
NEWS ANALYSIS
They Made History as ‘Firsts.’ That’s Not What They Ran On.
The first Muslim senator. The first Black woman to be elected governor of any state. The first openly gay male senator. The first Black governor of Florida. The first elected Hispanic governors in Texas and in California.
The number of “firsts” achieved on Tuesday’s elections was extraordinary. Barriers came crashing down across the country. And yet during the campaigns, the candidates themselves hardly uttered a word about being on the precipice of history. There were no exhortations to vote for a particular person because “representation matters.”
The first Black governor of Florida? That of course is Governor-elect Byron Donalds, the incoming Republican governor of the Sunshine State, the red state which hung on.
It was Republicans who voted Donalds in, making history as they did. Up in Michigan, that state's Republicans voted for another Black nominee, Candidate John James—but where Candidate Donalds won, Candidate James lost.
We wouldn't have voted for Donalds or James, but we note that Republicans in two major states did. Let's move to South Carolina, which elected a Democrat, Dr. Annie Andrews, in its Senate race:
This year, South Carolina's Republicans foolishly followed the sitting president's nutty advice in that Senate race. They nominated a poorly qualified candidate. Almost surely, that helped Andrews win.
Earlier, though, South Carolina's Republican voters sent Tim Scott to the Senate. They did so in a 2014 special election. They re-elected him in 2016 and 2022. In November 2028, they may even do it again.
(How was Scott first elected to the House? In the 2010 Republican primary, a run-off was held between Scott and Paul Thurmond, who was—yes!—Senator Strom Thurmond's son! Were those the days of miracle and wonder? South Carolina's Republican voters could have elected the son of Strom Thurmond. But they decided, way back then, that they'd go with the Black guy instead.)
We wouldn't have voted for Scott, but South Carolina's Republican voters did.
There's much, much more to be said about South Carolina's Republican voters, who sent Nikki Haley to the governor's mansion when she was just 39. There's mountains more to say about the larger topic of race in America.
We're omitting the mystery ride of Frederick Douglass—his history-altering, daring train ride out of the city in which we live. We're omitting the letter the Los Angeles pen pal sent to one of our own fifth grade students long ago, in the bicentennial year.
("You must be very proud to be growing up in the city where a great man like Frederick Douglass lived," that Los Angeles girl had written, after being told that the Baltimore girl was reading a book about Douglass. If memory serves, she and her family were living in Westwood. The letters of those antique pen pals were being written across the "racial" lines the pair had been forced to grow up with. The Baltimore girl to whom we refer, like her friends NAME WITHHELD and NAME WITHHELD, had an extremely kind heart. When we were shown the letter she'd written, the Los Angeles girl impressed us in a way we haven't forgotten.)
This year, Democrats ran candidates who grew from the cultural soil of their respective states. It turned out very well in this, a spectacular, sprawling continental nation with a wide array of varying culture zones.
Almost surely, the untreated disorders of the sitting president helped pull some of those candidates into the winner's circle. With respect to Governor-elect Donalds, we wouldn't have voted for him ourselves. On the other hand, we Blues haven't always been gracious enough to take yes for an answer when it comes to the way Red America's Republican voters have moved away from the past.
The state of Nebraska didn't come through in this year's Senate races. Tomorrow, without disrespecting the candidate in question, we'll consider one possible reason. We'll also recall what Paul Thurmond later said.
Democrats went with Colom. Republicans went with Donalds.
Tomorrow: What Paul Thurmond said
Somerby is dum.
ReplyDeleteSomerby is racist.
DeleteYou're both stupid.
DeletePerhaps.
DeleteBut Somerby is still a racist.
I’m stupid. Somerby is misogynist.
DeleteBy definition, a flip of a state has to involve a state that Dems have not been winning lately. That makes Somerby's statement sound majorly fatuous.
DeleteFatuous and flatulent.
Delete"the untreated disorders of the sitting president"
ReplyDeleteI wonder what type of treatment Somerby supposes Trump should be given and what its likely effects would be.
Electroshock. 5000 volts.
DeleteSomerby recommends pity, in the form of rolling over for Republicans.
DeleteDuh.
Delete
ReplyDelete"But they decided, way back then, that they'd go with the Black guy instead."
Your, and your fellow retarded Dumbocrats', constantly essentializing race is really unpleasant. No one cares about your skin tone, Bob.
...otherwise, sure, celebrate, enjoy your "shifting map" or whatever you choose to call it. While it lasts.
The best Mao could come up with while dodging drones.
Delete"While it lasts."
DeleteScientist have calculated that, given the known half-life of Trump-Stench isotopes, it will be several decades before voters will be able to vote Republican without being overpowered by the fumes.
Haha loser Mao. Everybody hates you.
DeleteYes, Trump's judgment was poor when he said Iran would be a snap. OTOH in other ways, his judgment is excellent:
ReplyDelete-- preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons is extremely important.
-- Ending the rule of the Mullahs and the IRGC would be of enormous benefit to the Iranian people and to the entire middle east.
-- And, Trump understands that Iran is our enemy and Israel is our friend. As compared with Obama who's policies foolishly helped Iran and punished Israel.
Israel is not our friend. It’s our tool. It’s worn and broken now, and we need to discard it.
Delete"Israel is our friend."
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.
Thanks for your comment, @1:12. I believe a great many people share your POV.
DeleteYet, your POV is without basis. Friendship between countries can be measured by amount of trade, military cooperation, technical cooperation, shared cultural values, travel between the two countries, etc.
On all these measures the US and Israel are close allies. Yet, somehow some people are promoting a message that there's something wrong with the US-Israel alliance.
DeleteHopefully there is no shared cultural values between the US and the ethnocentric settler-colonial entity in Palestine.
As for the trade and cooperation, that can (and should) change quickly. In a matter of days or weeks. And what "trade"? That entity is so small, as far as the the US is concerned, any trade with it must be a rounding error. Same with travel.
Israel is a country that is engaged in an ongoing genocide, something Iran has never done.
DeleteIsrael is a country that refuses to sign the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty, something Iran has signed.
Israel is a country that has developed and stockpiled nuclear weapons, something Iran has never done and has never even planned to, Iran literally has a fatwa against nuclear weapons, even the US Intel agencies recognized this (Tulsi Gabbard was pushed out for hinting at the truth of this).
Israel operates an apartheid country, something Iran does not do.
Israel is allied with Gulf dictatorships some of whom were involved in the 9/11 attack on America.
Leading Republican influencers say Israel was involved in killing Charlie Kirk.
Most countries fall short of the American model of religious freedom, but Israel falls shorter than Iran does.
Israel attacked a US Navy ship, killing 34 Americans, wounding 170 Americans and leading to the destruction of the ship.
Iran is no angel, but for the region they are the most democratic and "westernized" country in the area, supporting an educated middle class with some civil rights and culture.
The worse thing Iran has done is be a Muslim country, which White Christian Nationalists find terrifying. However, Iran is a Shia country, the Muslims that tend to cause problems are Sunni extremists, found in countries like Saudi Arabia.
Iran should be our friend.
Countries like Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Israel are our enemies.
When we don't recognize good potential allies like Iran, they wind up turning to our enemies. If America was run by smart and competent people, we would be trying to develop Iran as an ally.
Never forget the big dump Trump admin took on the heroes of Ukraine!
DeleteHey David, what is your take on the felon making millions selling early access to his "Truth's" so AI bots can place market trades seconds ahead of everyone else. That kind of blatant criming deserves impeachment correct?
DeleteIran has had a nuclear program since 1955, and has been weeks to months away from bomb production for many years. Hahahahaha.
DeleteWe cultivated the Iranians as an ally, but they didn’t like the ruler we supported, so they turned against us.
DeleteHey David what did the Felon do when he learned the chip guy was fucking a Chinese spy and sold her $20B worth of chips to illegally route to China? He dumped his fucking stock holdings. Is this the reason you support impeaching the treasonous bitch?
DeleteThe shared values we hold so dear are those related to overrunning the indigenous population.
DeleteSarcasm aside, to clarify:
DeleteIran has never had a nuclear weapons program, they have had a nuclear energy program, one we used to surreptitiously help them with. Yes, Netanyahu and neoconservatives have been falsely fearmongering over Iran for decades; Iran has been as close to a nuclear weapon as Trump has been to passing a good health plan.
Iran has on rare occasion enriched uranium beyond energy level, but this was obviously done for leverage not for developing weapons, and this is according to all the US Intelligence agencies, they all agree there is no ongoing nuclear weapons program.
Iran actually opposes nuclear weapons on principle. If anything would motivate them to develop nuclear weapons, it would be Trump's actions.
We never cultivated Iran as an ally, we forced them to be an ally by causing a coup and installing a dictator, which Iranians then overthrew in 79. Even so, Obama was able to mend fences enough to make an excellent deal, but Trump tore it up and instead bombed an Iranian girl's school. Bull in a china shop is too charitable.
What is wrong with the US - Israeli alliance amounts to over 3 billion dollars given annually to a country that is directly responsible for involving this country in an illegal and unwanted war. The Israelis count on this country to go to the mat for it, no questions asked, and AIPAC and wealthy Zionist donors have enabled this one sided relationship. Let them stand for themselves or form regional alliances that promote their safety. They would be far less prone to genocidal and regionally destabilizing activity if they didn't have the unquestioning support of this government. The page is being turned by clear headed America first citizens and those who rightly think that sticking our nose into this quagmire perpetually has been counterproductive and frankly dangerous US foreign policy.
Delete"Donald Trump is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I've ever known in my life.”
Delete@4:46 wrote "Iran has never had a nuclear weapons program." @4:46 is accusing President Obama of being an idiot for giving Iran a huge amount of money to persuade them to delay their nuclear weapons program. I do not agree. I think both Presidents Obama and Trump were right to view Iran's nuclear program as threat.
Delete@2:51 right ridicule the continuing exaggerated claim that Iran has been very close to a nuclear program. But, the fact that some people exaggerated the imminence of Iran's nuclear risk, does not mean that the risk wasn't real. Nevertheless, nothing ever happens until it happens. India and Pakistan never had nuclear weapons until they did.
DeleteThe Iranian leaders are acting like people who want to develop nuclear. They're permitting a lot of economic suffering in order to maintain their program.
"@4:46 is accusing President Obama of being an idiot for giving Iran a huge amount of money to persuade them to delay their nuclear weapons program."
DeleteHow many @4:46's are there on this thread? Because the one I see said, "Obama was able to mend fences enough to make an excellent deal".
The words "excellent deal" preclude the interpretation that @4:46 thought Obama was an 'idiot'.
Try to read and think more carefully.
"is right to ridicule"
DeleteWrong, dickface in cal, Trump is the idiot for tearing up the JCPOA, you fucking treasonous cunt
DeleteStating that Obama gave Iran a huge amount of money purposely neglects to mention that the money was frozen Iranian assets. The right wing likes to suggest that federal money was involved in this transaction because it keeps in line with their fake narrative. Likewise we are to believe that this ongoing war is to prevent the acquisition of nuclear weapons after Trump already had proclaimed that the Iranian capacity to produce them had been destroyed. The 8:23 post is nothing but speculation serving Israeli interests. As if the only way to obtain weapons grade uranium is by enriching it in Iran. Iran’s allies include bad actors who have such stockpiles in abundance, including the Russians whom they have supplied with a steady stream of drones with which to attack Ukraine.
DeleteGod bless Jewish people.
DeleteAlso, fuck Israel.
Somerby: Republicans have voted for a couple of Black people, so racism is over y'all.
ReplyDeleteThis kind of idiotic analysis exemplifies a pernicious form of racism called tokenism.
Frederick Douglass would find Somerby's racism repugnant. Somerby knows this and rubs our noses in it.
Somerby going slightly mask off today, still reeling from and coping with the midterm results.
Exactly.
Delete"Exactly." Duh.
Delete"so racism is over y'all"
DeletePerhaps you could point me to where Somerby said this. I seem to have missed it, but I feel sure you wouldn't have just made up shit about Somerby, right?
Today's post hand-waves the midterms, then tries to scare us about Cuba, and then instead of focusing on all the minorities the Dems historically elected, he focuses on the few minorities Republicans have supported, suggesting this represents "days of miracle and wonder" and how Republicans electing 3 minorities in the recent past speaks to "the larger topic of race in America."
DeleteThen he ends it with a smug both sides snark.
Somerby is clearly connecting a handful of minority Republicans getting elected over the past years with a rosy picture of race in America.
Btw, I grew up and have close ties in SC, racism is as strong there as it ever was.
1:48 is spot on, not only is this braindead analysis, but it is also a nasty form of racism itself. Somerby isn't even bothering to hide it much, he is fairly open with his racism. Some people just have their head in the sand.
Racism in SC is as strong as it ever was. So they still enslave Black people, and they’re likely to shell a U.S. base.
DeleteGive them time...
DeleteYes if it was legal, SC would go back to slavery in a heartbeat.
DeleteAs it is, Black people suffer more in SC than most places. And they are still used as slaves via the 13th amendment. Racism in America is alive and kicking. The more Dems address this issue, the better they do in elections. Whites tend to favor Republicans so when Dems win it is usually due in large part to minority support.
Most SC rednecks are fine with fighting another Civil War, many look forward to it. “The South will rise again” is a common refrain in SC.
Somerby's contention is both baseless and racist.
Spot on.
DeleteWhen someone whines about Dems addressing racism, that is someone who wants Dems to lose.
5:04 - So you've told me that, in your view, Somerby is racist, and I guess we're all entitled to our opinions. But, really, that's a deflection, isn't it? You still haven't pointed out where Somerby says racism is over, have you?
Delete"Somerby isn't even bothering to hide it much, he is fairly open with his racism. Some people just have their head in the sand.'
DeleteSome have their head up their ass. Like you, for instance.
"we Blues haven't always been gracious enough to take yes for an answer when it comes to the way Red America's Republican voters have moved away from the past."
Delete5:04, 5:07, 5:44, 5:53 - I think Somerby is talking about you here.
How many Americans have even a clue about how this evil Administration is hurting Cuba for years?
Delete"Somerby's contention is both baseless and racist."
DeleteThe commenter doesn't tell us exactly what Somerby's contention is, but let's suppose it's something like 'Recent Republican victories are evidence of a dramatic improvement in race relations in the US.'
Suppose further that this hypothetical statement of Somerby's is incorrect. Does this make Somerby a racist? Is it racist to be overly optimistic about the state of race relations?
And, as a followup, does overuse of an accusation like 'racist' cause the people being falsely accused to dislike the people falsely accusing them? Does it add to the political polarization Somerby laments?
It is racist for a white person to deny the existence of racism, given that he doesn't experience it himself and refuses to accept the views of those who do. Of course white racists are defensive and feel hostile toward those who point out their racism. White racists would prefer to go their racist ways, undisturbed, except that they harm others by doing so.
DeleteThis is not the time of miracles and wonder. It is 40 years since Paul Simon released his album. In 1986, we had a voting rights act and a Justice Depart that was not busily rolling back DEI, removing black generals from their earned positions in our military. Today is not an improvement in terms of race relations while bigots are doing horrible things to black people, such as Ilhan Omar, who had her home searched because Trump hates American citizens of Somalian heritage (i.e., black people). We are not that far removed from BLM and the murder of George Floyd by a cop, on video using excessive force, not because Floyd was a terrible criminal (he passed a fake $20 bill in a convenience store, perhaps unknowingly).
Somerby is so racist he cannot talk about race relations in our country and make any sense. Trump had his token Omarosa, who he fired. Byron Donalds is another Trump suckup who will be shoved under the bus when he becomes inconvenient. Trump loves to hang around with black athletes who are stupid enough to think he respects them. That is not racial progress. Trump is dismantling the college financial aid that black students relied upon. That is not progress for black colleges or students.
Somerby is an asshole. His defenders should be ashamed of themselves. DG asking for exact quotes doesn't prove anything about Somerby's racial attitudes. Somerby's own word choices and arguments reveal his racism. And no, Democrats are not going to stop calling out racism because anti-racist activities work to reduce racist attitudes in our culture overall -- studies show that and election stats show it. So Somerby's fear that using the word racist is going to upset Republicans is true of hard-core bigots, but good decent people change their ways when confronted with racist behavior.
I couldn't help notice that in four substantial paragraphs, you didn't answer my question:
DeleteIs it racist to be overly optimistic about the state of race relations?
Not to deny racism (your straw man). But is it racist to be overly optimistic, because that is all Somerby can be fairly accused of, based on his post today, or his post on any day for that matter.
10:02- Perhaps I should be ashamed of myself, perhaps not, but I would think that if you are going to be so boorish as to throw the R-bomb at Our Host you’d accurately quote him, or at least accurately paraphrase him.
DeleteRemember: You premised your accusation that Somerby is racist by claiming that Somerby said racism is over. That was false — and it’s still false even if you write several paragraphs of mean-spirited obfuscation.
We'll all be dead before Somerby says not all Republican voters are bigots.
DeleteSurely there must be a Somerby post somewhere discussing the continued existence of racism and how we as a nation must continue the fight against it.
DeleteSurely, DG?
DG, claiming that someone didn't say something simply because they didn't use your exact wording, is a dick move.
Delete9:13 - Somerby never said or implied that racism is over. It’s a dick move to falsely say that he did.
DeleteI've been providing evidence. You have not. You just keeping insisting he must say the exact words "racism is over" not just imply it while arguing that black candidates need only dare to win, for white Republicans to support them.
DeleteActually, I don’t care about exact words at all. You made a claim — that Somerby said that racism is over. That claim is false.
DeleteNow it is true that you’ve made a multitude of other false claims in an effort to confound and confuse, but I’ll have to let those go for lack of time and interest.
'You just keeping insisting he must say the exact words "racism is over"'
DeleteIf you accuse someone of saying 'racism is over,' I suppose it's not necessary that they have expressed it in those exact terms, but you have to be able to point to SOMETHING they said that directly supports your accusation.
So how come you can't?
Somerby never used the words "The Right are reactionaries", but we all knew what he meant when he wrote that our insistence on equal rights for all is why Trump is President.
DeleteSo, you tell us that Somerby said, or implied, that Trump is president because Blues insisted on equal rights? You’re just baiting me, right?
DeleteYes, I’m baiting you, master.
DeleteSomerby is claiming that Red America has moved away from the past, meaning racism. His evidence: republicans have voted for black candidates here and there. If you agree with this, you must feel that red America is no longer racist.
DeleteWell, you agree that Republicans have voted for blacks here and there, right? So by your “logic,” you must feel that red America is no longer racist, right?
DeleteDG,
DeleteWhy do you think Somerby spent months telling us the election of Trump was caused by us Blues, if he wasn't inferring Republican voters are reactionaries?
What is the key to Magat political skill? Being "a stunningly unskilled" person.
ReplyDeleteQuestion: if there was, as our President has told us, voter fraud in the midterms, will the DOJ be investigating? Can we expect indictments over this POTUS-attention-grabbing fraud? Or is Trump full of shit?
ReplyDeleteTrump keeps saying he can end his Iran war at any time, and his supporters clap and cheer this, which is wild.
DeleteSo.......
Yes, no, and yes - maybe.
ReplyDeleteSo, we “blues” are advised by Somerby to congratulate Red America for voting for a black man in Florida? For overcoming their past bigotry to do so?
ReplyDeleteThis seems patronizing and damning with faint praise. The task of overcoming racism must continue, and the Republican Party still has a lot of work to do to root out its white nationalist contingent.
Starting with Stephen Miller.
DeleteTrump’s FAA issued a ground stop. They still have no idea what hit them.
ReplyDeleteThey rolled out new AI software to replace air traffic controllers today. They are blaming it on Verizon. We will see. Or with these evil clowns probably not.
DeleteWhat’s up with the DEI, dickface in cal?
Delete7:06 incorrect
DeleteThis administration always lies.
DeleteI hate it when Somerby takes song lyrics and applies them to situations they were not written to describe. It is lazy and slapdash, expecting the songs to do the heavy lifting on ideas Somerby never thinks through.
ReplyDeleteThe album Graceland featured African musicians and musical style. Although Simon credited them for their collaboration with him, he was accused of cultural appropriation to revive his stagnating career. The music is great but there is considerable irony in Somerby grabbing this song lyric to tout the demise of racism on the right, while Simon himself was being accused of racial insensitivity for that same album.
This is too subtle to be deliberate irony on Somerby's part, but it isn't beyond him to ignore the racial aspects of Simon's controversial album while also blindly calling racism over.
"• Apartheid Cultural Boycott: Organizations like Artists United Against Apartheid (including Jerry Dammers, Dali Tambo, and Billy Bragg) condemned Simon, arguing that breaking the boycott undermined international pressure to end apartheid. The African National Congress (ANC) did not clear his trip. Simon countered that the album was a celebration of cross-racial collaboration that put global focus on South African artists.
Delete• Cultural Appropriation & Exploitation: Critics accused Simon of appropriating indigenous South African styles for his own career revival after a commercial slump. Conversely, collaborators like Ladysmith Black Mambazo, Hugh Masekela, and Miriam Makeba defended the project, noting it launched or elevated their global careers and brought massive international exposure to South African music."
"while Simon himself was being accused of racial insensitivity for that same album."
DeleteWhat if those accusations were just woke bullshit?
You mean like, "We're better than this"?
Delete8:56: Woke is the new Maga, loser. Christopher Rufo is married to a foreign Asian, it was all a lie, loser.
Delete
ReplyDeleteMama aborted me for my down syndrome, but I survived.
Haha
How about this for racism? Somerby recently wrote that the solution to gerrymandering is for black politicians to work harder to be acceptable to white voters. That's what he explained with "dare to struggle, dare to win." Somerby supported dismantling the Voting Rights Act and failed to be outraged by racial gerrymandering because he thinks it is no longer necessary, given that racism is over. Today he says that Byron Donalds election in FL proves that. All that was needed is for black candidates to appeal more to white voters. If a black candidate is right wing enough, white Republicans will vote for him, thus there is no need to worry about vote suppression of Democratic voters who happen to be black. It is just partisanship, tribalism, Somerby claims. Not racism.
ReplyDeleteBut what else is partisanship than racism? Republicans are Republican because they want to dismantle DEI and hurt blacks, women, immigrants. That is what it means to be a Republican -- not fiscal conservatism (which seems to have been abandoned by the right in favor of bigotry and corruption).
Somerby is racist because he refuses to take a stand against bigotry.
"we Blues haven't always been gracious enough to take yes for an answer when it comes to the way Red America's Republican voters have moved away from the past."
ReplyDeleteHow exactly has Red America moved away from the past, meaning their racism? By voting for a couple of black candidates? Wow. Congrats, Red America. Now address the systemic racial problems America faces.
86% of the black voters in Florida last Tuesday voted for the Democrat, David Jolly.
ReplyDeleteSomerby is back to admiring young teen girls again, with this story about penpals, which he has told before. He thinks racial boundaries have been crossed because a young girl in California has written to one in Baltimore about Frederick Douglass. Somerby notes that the young girl in CA is from Westwood, a part of Los Angeles. He does not seem to know that Westwood is the home of UCLA and University High School, surrounded by a large upscale Jewish community. That little girl knows about Frederick Douglass because of woke DEI efforts on a campus known for anti-racist activism, and perhaps because her parents are professors or progressives immersed in left-wing political views. They are hardly examples of the demise of racism but of the parenting efforts or university environment that promotes awareness of civil rights and the struggle for equality by black people.
ReplyDeleteThat makes Somerby's use of this penpal example as much a joke as his Paul Simon example.
But this does bring to mind yet another essay Somerby wrote extolling the virtues of a young woman who longs to participate in a surfing contest while working as a hotel main in Hawaii to support her younger sister. Lots of young girls in bathing suits on surfboards (and off them). Somerby repeatedly described this as his favorite movie. Wink wink, nod, nod. I'm sure Somerby's attraction to this film is the surfing prowess, amirite?
Blue Crush is the film's name.
DeleteThis is the kind of story about a young girl that actual Democrats like:
Delete"When money threatened to become a barrier to Joyce Chisale's education, The K.I.N.D. (Kids in Need of Desks) Fund stepped in, awarding her a full, merit‑based scholarship that helped her complete high school and graduate at the top of her class. The K.I.N.D. Fund began in 2010 when Lawrence O'Donnell, host of "The Last Word" on MS NOW, partnered with UNICEF to provide desks to schools in Malawi, where learners typically sit on the floor. Since then, The K.I.N.D. Fund has delivered over 420,000 desks to classrooms across the country and awarded more than 52,000 scholarships to keep girls like Joyce in school."
Meanwhile, Republicans in the US live in terror that one of these black girls with high school diplomas might come to the US to live. And Trump thinks that Africa is a country, not a continent.
Africa was a province of the Roman Empire, in what’s now Tunisia, with parts of Algeria and Libya.
DeleteSomerby likes to look at young women. What a pervert.
DeleteHe and Roy Moore.
DeleteSean Duffy explaining why their fuckup yesterday was not their fault
ReplyDeletePerhaps this is one reason everyone hates them.
DeleteSean went to his spreadsheet last night and quickly calculated he would need $50 billion for Orange Mighty Mouse to “come save the day “
Delete