DEATH BY STUPID: Smartest person's greatest question!

TUESDAY, JULY 5, 2016

Part 1—We return to Maddow the clown:
In the past several months, MSNBC has been runnings ads about its biggest star.

Rather plainly, the ads are designed to con the liberal world's many gullibles about this biggest star. The star in question is Rachel Maddow, host of the low-IQ 9 P.M. weeknight entertainment/propaganda offering, The Rachel Maddow Show.

As we type, we're looking at the ad as it appeared in a recent New Yorker. With just a hint of Soviet realism, it presents a drawing of the star, set off against three blurbs concerning her manifest greatness.

"Arguably the smartest person on TV," the first blurbs says. It's sourced to this brief post in Vanity Fair, in which Bruce Handy discusses Maddow's interview in the March edition of Playboy.

Is Maddow the smartest person on TV? Arguably, she is! It all depends on the meaning of "smartest person on TV!" But arguably, it's she.

Having issued his provisional claim, Handy proceeded to quote this smartest person. This is the text he chose to reprint from her Playboy chat, one of the smartest ever:
MADDOW (3/16): It is weird to be in an industry where everybody is so good-looking. I do not think of myself as a physically attractive person. I think of myself as a goober. I dress like an eight-year-old with a credit card. . . . All those blondes at Fox. I mean, if I worked at a place where they did not allow you to wear sleeves, could you imagine? Or where all the desks had Lucite bottoms so you could show your shins. Jesus, I feel very lucky that at MSNBC they’re like, “You’re fine in the $19 blazer.”
Thus spake the arguably smartest one of them all.

Handy has been at Vanity Fair since 1999, when he came over from Time. The general dumbness of his post helps us see what "smartest" means to the people who constitute our upper-end "press corps."

As for Maddow herself, the smartest person was full of excitement at the start of last Wednesday night's TV show.

As she started, she pimped a "special report" that turned out to be anything but. First, though, we were goingt o get some exciting new poll results:
MADDOW (6/29/16): First of all, we've got a new Rachel Maddow Show special report on Flint, Michigan, tonight.

If you have wondered how Flint has been doing after the huge scrum of media attention they got a few months back when the country was briefly transfixed by that city getting lead-poisoned by Michigan state government, well, now we have gone back to Flint. And in our special report tonight, you will see that what has happened there in the last few months, and what is happening there right now is stuff that will surprise you.

That is coming up tonight.

We've also got exclusively some brand-new polling data in the presidential race, data that nobody else has got. We are debuting it here, hot off the presses tonight.
That "special report" was anything but, a point we'll review by the end of the week. Nor would it be "first of all,"despite what Maddow had said.

Before we got that "special report," we got those brand-new polling data, which were hot off the presses. Maddow had the data exclusively, as she excitedly said.

The hot new data came from PPP, a polling concern with which the Maddow Show has concocted some sort of arrangement. Needless to say, the new polling data were no more useful than any of the tons of data already available, but Maddow didn't tell the gullibles that.

Arguably, Maddow is too smart to provide that sort of information to the gullibles who tune her in. Instead, she entertained us this night with "the greatest polling question yet of the 2016 race."

What was that greatest question? Three minutes into his orange-shoed program, the smartest person was saying this, as a bit of a tease:
MADDOW: Here's the great thing, though, about having a first look at polling data specifically from PPP, as we do tonight. Because PPP is sort of—

"Eccentric" is not the right word. "Out of the box," that's the right phrase! They're not afraid to think outside the box. That's the way we'll put it.

PPP is the polling company that is most likely to ask burning, if weird, questions that real people actually talk about and actually worry about,
even if no other pollster wants to go there.
Interesting! We were about to see the data which resulted when PPP dared to ask one of "the burning questions that real people actually talk about and actually worry about."

According to the smartest person, this particular burning question was the greatest polling question yet! Here's what the smartest person said when she gave it to us verbatim:
MADDOW: This is truly amazing. Are you ready for what I believe is the greatest polling question yet of the 2016 race? Are you ready?

I'm going to read it to you verbatim. This is exactly how it was asked for, how it was asked for this nationwide poll of registered voters that we have got for the first time here tonight.

Are you ready? Here it is. I am quoting directly:

"If the choices for president were Democrat Hillary Clinton, Republican Donald Trump, or a giant meteor hitting the earth, which would you choose?"
To watch this nonsense, click here.

As the smartest person continued, she gave us the relevant data. She told us what happened when PPP asked that greatest question of all, the question the others won't ask.

Briefly, we'll review those data when we return to this topic tomorrow. For today, please understand the focus of this week's award-winning, four-part report.

Manifestly, the smartest person on TV is a corporate con man, a clown. She seems to be convinced that her liberal audience is arguably quite dumb. She seems quite happy to work from that self-dealing premise.

By the way:

In PPP's new nationwide poll, Candidate Clinton was leading Candidate Trump, but only by one point. That result was an outlier, but it wasn't a massive outlier.

How did we ever reach the point where such a poll result could occur? For ourselves, we'd point to a long-standing culture of dumbness—the culture in which we're told that this manifest music man is just extremely smart.

In fairness, Maddow has become rich and famous playing this low-IQ game. Arguably, though, Candidate Trump could end up in the White House.

Tomorrow: The dumbness was present all week

52 comments:

  1. The troll will post a reasoned, sensible rebuttal below.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It took 41 minutes for Anon.@ 10:46 to realize a new day had dawned allowing fresh tribute to be paid at the Daily Howler to Troll, God of the Sun and Patron Saint of Commentary.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Of course, Trump is a terrible candidate, for many reasons, one of which is media bias.

    Nevertheless, there are two reasons why Trump could wind up in the White House:

    1. Barack Obama (More precisely, his results)
    2. Hillary Clinton.

    Many things have gone badly in the last 8 years: mediocre economic growth, especially weak economy in certain lower middle class areas, rise in crime in many cities, middle east falling apart, Russia expanding, continuing Islamic terrorist mass killings here abroad, etc. Also, some of Obama's radical policies have upset a lot of people, such as demanding that men be allowed to use girls' bathrooms and changing rooms.

    Meanwhile Hillary Clinton is weak candidate: poor speaker, not well-liked, not good-looking, lack of accomplishments in office, regarded as dishonest, has put her own interest before the country's interest in choosing to use a pesonal e-mail server.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you are at the wrong blog.

      How "good looking" does a 68 year old former Secretary of State have to be? How good looking was Henry Kissinger, for example?

      To my knowledge, no one has demanded that men be allowed to use girls bathrooms (by girls, I assume you mean women). A transwoman is not a man.

      The remainder of your comment is similarly idiotic -- and off topic.

      Delete
    2. Keep in mind that Dave the Republican's solution includes first and foremost slashing taxes for billionaires and eliminating the minimum wage.

      The last time we had a President of Dave's liking in the White House the economy was shrinking at a depression level -8.9% rate and was shedding -750,000 jobs a month.

      Delete
    3. "...Trump is a terrible candidate... [because] of media bias"?
      More and more I am convinced that the contents of your cranial cavity is more likely to be fecal matter rather than gray matter.

      Delete
    4. 11:03 - I am not espousing that good looks be a qualification for President. In fact, I wish that weren't the case. But it seems to me that good looks are a big asset in this day of TV.

      2:08 -- omitting part of a quote to make it sound ridiculous was pioneered by Maureen Dowd. Some people call this practice "Dowdification."

      Delete
    5. Hillary Clinton is weak candidate: poor speaker, not well-liked, not good-looking, lack of accomplishments in office, regarded as dishonest, has put her own interest before the country's interest

      Completely opposite that eloquent, handsome, public-minded philanthropist, D. Trump.

      Delete
    6. As I said, Trump is a terrible candidate, for many reasons.

      Something is wrong with a primary election process that produced these two as their party's candidates. I suspect one problem is that it's a huge advantage to start be widely known.

      Delete
    7. David's good looks got him in the door, but his talent and hard work brought success as an actuary.

      Delete
  4. Even Oprah conformed to gender norms for on-camera journalists at the beginning of her career. She is arguably a lot smarter than Maddow.

    Maddow is being coy. She doesn't want to come right out and say that she dresses as she does because of her sexual identity. Instead she mocks women who do not pick their own clothing or hairstyles, because they are doing what their show runners tell them to do. That doesn't make her smart. It makes her not only dumb, but mean-spirited.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Art Styles of the Old Evil EmpireJuly 5, 2016 at 11:56 AM

      "Even Oprah...."

      Well, with an opening like that you seem more intelligent than both Maddow and Winfrey. So tell us, what are "gender norms for on-camera journalists", and how did Winfrey conform to them at the beginning of her career? At what point did her non-conformance begin?

      When you have finished with that, be sure to e-mail Bob Somerby some tips about what else Rachel Maddow "doesn't want." It could freshen up his Maddow routine which he obviously plans to revisit this week.

      Delete
    2. Does Maddow freshen up her routine?

      Delete
    3. Only when her "show runners" tell her to do so according to past Somerby offerings.

      Does your inability to answer indicate your intellect was not quite what was presumed at first reading of your comment?

      Delete
    4. Winfrey conformed at the beginning of her career via hairstyle and dress and by maintaining low weight. You can tell when she gained control over her career because she began gaining weight.

      For Maddow, who can dictate terms about her appearance, to mock the women who cannot do that is particularly insensitive given that any liberal woman should understand gender politics. I am disappointed in her.

      Delete
    5. Art Styles of the Old Evil EmpireJuly 6, 2016 at 10:25 AM

      Your sole criteria for not conforming to "gender norms" is Oprah getting fat? Didn't she start wearing bib overalls and sporting a stovepipe haircut as well?

      For you, commenting on Maddow, aren't her remarks somewhat like Hillary Clinton's dismissal of women who bake cookies and reflect marital values of some Tammy Wynette lyrics? I'm disppointed you didn't mention this. That said, given your silence during Bob's mocking the wage gap issue, I am not surprised.

      Delete
    6. Art (but your real name is Slippery Dishonesty),

      Somerby never mocked the wage gap issue. He mocked the people who were so stupid as to get the numbers wrong, so could easily be dismissed by conservatives.

      You only win arguments with Strawman Bob.

      Delete
  5. FBI Director Comey proved to those Americans in denial that HRC lied when she claimed she never sent emails marked classified or sent emails that were classified at the time sent. Comey also stated his staff found evidence that HRC violated the security act, but will let HRC slide. Good news for Loretta Lynch.

    No word on Clinton Foundation investigation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Does "let her slide" mean no criminal wrongdoing found? Who knew the FBI was such a pushover.

      Delete
    2. Negative. Comey said the FBI will not advise the DOJ to prosecute HRC. He did say HRC was "extremely careless" which is the same standard as 18 USC 793 subsection F "gross negligence." Comey figured it would take a deliberate action by HRC to win the case against her, not that HRC didn't meet the standard of "gross negligence."


      But you have zero to say about HRC lying all this time about Top Secret info on her numerous private email servers?

      Delete
    3. This is what I have to say about HRC: She'd make a much better president than Trump.

      Delete
    4. The classified documents were determined to be classified later, not at the time they were sent. Further, Clinton received those emails -- she didn't send them to anyone.

      Surely it matters what someone was negligent about. Negligence about preserving public records in conformance with archival regulations is different than negligence in safeguarding sensitive information, for example.

      I don't believe HRC has lied "all this time" about anything. I believe this is another conservative attempt to slander the most viable Democratic candidate for president. The political motives are obvious and once again, there is no substance to the attacks.

      Maybe Bernie Sanders will concede now?

      Delete
    5. @2:23

      Continuing to repeat HRC's lies in the face of FBI Director Comey's press conference suggests you are incapable of rational thinking.

      "From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification." FBI Director Comey July 5, 2016

      Delete
    6. Maybe this portion substantiates HRC's fairy tale?

      "In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail." FBI Director Comey July 5, 2016

      Nope.

      Delete
    7. cicero, you are wrong as usual.

      This is what Comey said in reference to emails marked as classified:

      "Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information."

      This does not indicate HRC lied. Her claim is that she did not send or receive emails marked as classified. Comey saying that a small number of emails bore markings indicating the presence of classified information, does not contradict HRC's statement. It is a precisely worded sentence conveying vague information. Comey pointedly does not say that Clinton sent or received emails "marked as classified". Clearly had that occurred, Comey would have said as such very precisely.

      This is now a dead issue for Republicans. It never was going to gain traction and now it is over. Clinton continues the trend in rising poll numbers over her opponent.

      Delete
    8. @8:50

      Comey's statement is unambiguous. HRC lied about not sending or receiving emails marked Top Secret, Secret or Confidential. HRC lied about the emails were not classified at the time they were sent or received.

      Remember when Howler libs insisted the FBI investigation was not about HRC's criminality in handling classified info on her private server(s) ? HRC also lied about this being a "security review."

      Dead issue? Not even on MSNBC is it a dead issue. Even though Rachel Maddow didn't cover Bill Clinton meeting with Loretta Lynch, the rest of MSNBC is still talking about Comey's reprimand of HRC and describing her as incompetent as well as Foggy Bottom when it comes to handling U.S. secrets.

      Delete
    9. cicero, you "lie" in the same way you accuse of HRC.

      HRC did not lie, she did not send or receive emails marked classified. At worst "Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information."

      Republican Comey has never accused HRC of lying. Comey did not say HRC sent or received emails marked as classified. He made a different statement, instead of simply and directly saying HRC received emails marked as classified, he made an oblique statement. Why? You betcha, HRC did not send or receive emails marked as classified!

      Wrong, cicero. It turned out the FBI investigation was not criminal, and in fact was referred to the FBI as a security review. Republican Comey refused to term it as a criminal investigation, even under intense pressure from Fox News clowns (some of whom he has more than a passing interest).

      Dead as a doorknob, cicero. The media want a horse race more than anything. They will indulge a modicum of angry republican coverage of Comey's statement briefly, and then it will be dropped, by all, with the possible exception of bitter Republicans.

      Delete
    10. @8:21

      Comey appeared before Congress today and did indeed say that the answers HRC gave during the FBI interview were not consistent with what she has told the public and Congress about her private email server(s).

      Of course the investigation was about HRC and it was about possible criminal violations of security. If it were not, there would be no recommendation by the FBI to DOJ to prosecute or not prosecute.

      If Comey is such a tool of the GOP as you imagine, why were all the Dems questioning Comey today extolling his virtues as a non partisan?

      Delete
  6. She lied about the $19. Puffing her bio like Brian Williams.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These hacks like Maddow, Williams and OReilly lie about themselves to their viewers. Pathetic.

      Delete
    2. She puffs to the max with the humble brags etc. what a sad, sad sack.

      Delete
    3. I noticed that too. She wears Prada jackets already. She certainly assumes her viewers don't know expensive clothes when they see them.

      Delete
    4. I wonder about her propensity to lie. Specially about the cost of her blazer. Makes her seem more normal maybe. Less false that the Fox hosts.

      Delete
    5. I wonder what you were chomping down for lunch in between comments to yourself. Central Time Zone, right?

      Delete
    6. Very far from it.

      Delete
  7. Looksism rears its (excuse me) ugly head in a variety of ways. It's no secret good-looking people have all kinds of advantages. OTOH, no one ever thinks they're as smart as the dweeb in glasses. Nonsense. For every brainiac who looks like Bill Gates, there's some decent-looking Steve Jobs ready to kick intellectual sand in his face. Not all beauties are Sarah Palin in the smarts department.

    Take the number of hot blondes in the world who want to be on TV. Then take the number of women smart enough be mouth the party on cue. Take those few who fall into both categories and statistically you've got plenty of hot babes for Fox News to take care of the party line as well as the panty lines. Who needs slags for intellectual credibility? Thanks, Mary Matalin. We'll phone you.

    But look at MSNBC's current "Catchy News, Fabulous Babes" line up. At times Rachel is forced to sit among MSNBC's "K" Girls, including Kasie "Kiss Me" Hunt, top heavy Katy Tur, exotic Kristen Welker, and slightly older and plumper Irish beauty Kelly O'Donnell. Not to mention Hallie Jackson, whose "K" falls in middle of her name. You could write a Beach Boys song about these honeys.

    All these women are credible capable journalists who manage to look great at the same time -- and not in that plastic, vaguely cheap way that's so appealing to the dirty old men watching Fox. No hiked up dresses or cleavages like rising dough for the MSNBC K Girls, and no sitting around mewing about Hillary and other designated villains like they're in some sewing circle. No, the K girls get out there and find out what's happening while the wind blows invitingly through flowing locks and they bring those microphones gently to their voluptuously lips as if they were... as if they were....

    As Mark Twain once said (or was it Hal Holbrook?): "Heaven for climate; Hell for society." I used to say: MSNBC for news; Fox for sex." Thanks to the K Girls, I no longer have to switch back and forth. In her VF interview, Rachel either spoke too soon or was guilty of calling the Fox kettle ... Gorgeous.



    ReplyDelete
  8. You know this,how?The puffing part is pure RWNJ blathering point.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The smartest person on tv is like the most honest person in congress. Ignorance is a requirement of the form.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The NYTimes is insisting that Clinton is severely damaged by Comey's complaints. The Wash Post is talking about trust issues. Meanwhile Clinton gave a speech about education yesterday that no one covered.

    If Bill Clinton wanted to make a deal with Lynch, he could have called her. This is the silliest "optics" problem ever.

    What is wrong with people?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Huffington Post won't give up on Sanders. Today they are saying that Clinton's promise of debt-free college education came from Sanders. I heard her speech and she promised debt renegotiation and forgiveness after 10 years of public service (such as teaching). That isn't what Bernie Sanders was suggesting at all. It is what Clinton has proposed all along.

    But the fantasy lives on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And the pictures. One showing a stern, pointing, angry Clinton with nothing but overweight women in the background. The other showing her with plastered down hair like Flo from Progressive ads and shadows that make her look like the Beareded Lady.

      Delete
    2. Paragraph 2 of the HuffPo article:

      "The new plan, announced by her campaign Wednesday, incorporates a major plank of Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-Vt.) platform and is a direct result of the private meeting Clinton had with the Vermont senator in June, THE CAMPAIGN SAID."*

      * Caps and highlights added by commenter for benefit of one of Hillary's 'biggest problems.'

      Delete
  12. Hey everyone....I'm very excited sharing this amazing testimony about how i save my marriage and get my husband back today....And you can also get your Ex Lover back right now no matter how hopeless your situation seems with the help of best online spell caster that is powerful and genuine Dr.Unity....My husband and I have been together for 33 years before he divorced me and i was so upset because i thought i have lost my marriage forever… i did all i could to please for my husband to bring me back home but all to be in vain.. i had to travel away from my state because i was not having anywhere to stay because my home was not conducive for me to stay because my husband want me out of the house, i travel to a friend of mine in California, one night, when i was searching on a good spell caster results that help in bringing back lost lover’s and husband’s, i found an interesting story that was shared by Santana Valdez From Texas Huston, about a good spell caster called Dr.Unity, and how he helped her in getting her husband back home, and i decided to put a try in contacting him… he replied me back.. i thought at first these was just normal and he told me that i was going to get back my husband after a period of 28 hours i still doubted him…. But today as i am sharing these good news is for me to express my experience to all the whole universe that these is a good spell caster that helps in bringing back lost lovers and he is ( Unityspelltemple@gmail.com ) I am happily with my husband and my 3 kids, TARRY, WENDY, JEFF… great Dr Unity i thank you for helping me to get my family back…. his email address is: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com ..

    ReplyDelete
  13. My Husband divorce me for no reason, Thanks to Dr happy for bringing back my husband,and brought me great joy to my family once again, My name is crystal . i live in USA New Jersey, I`m happily married to a lovely and caring husband,with three kids A very big problem occurred in my family 2 weeks ago,between me and my husband so terrible that he took the case to court for a divorce he said that he never wanted to stay with me again,and that he did not love me anymore So he packed out of my house and made me and my children passed through several pain. I tried all my possible means to get him back,after much begging,but all to no avail and he confirmed it that he has made his decision,and he never wanted to see me again. So on one evening,as i was coming back from work,i met an old friend of mine who asked of my husband So i explained every thing to her,so she told me that the only way i can get my husband back,is to visit a spell caster,because it has really worked for her too So i never believed in spell,but i had no other choice,than to follow her advice. Then she gave me the email address of the spell caster whom she visited.(happylovespell2@gmail.com}, So the next morning,i sent a mail to the address she gave to me,and the spell caster assured me that i will get my husband back the next day what an amazing statement!! I never believed,so he spoke with me,and told me everything that i need to do. Then the next morning, So surprisingly, my husband who did not call me for the past seven {2}weeks,gave me a call to inform me that he was coming back So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me and my children. Then from that day,our relationship was now stronger than how it were before,by the help of a spell caster . So, i will advice you out there to kindly visit Dr happy ,if you are in any condition like this,or you have any problem related to "bringing your ex back. So thanks to Dr happy for bringing back my husband,and brought great joy to my family once again. { happylovespell2@gmail.com }, Thanks you Dr happy, i will always be testifying about your good work. also call him on +2348133873774.your spell is really a 100% Guarantee sure and safe

    ReplyDelete
  14. My Husband divorce me for no reason, Thanks to Dr happy for bringing back my husband,and brought me great joy to my family once again, My name is crystal . i live in USA New Jersey, I`m happily married to a lovely and caring husband,with three kids A very big problem occurred in my family 2 weeks ago,between me and my husband so terrible that he took the case to court for a divorce he said that he never wanted to stay with me again,and that he did not love me anymore So he packed out of my house and made me and my children passed through several pain. I tried all my possible means to get him back,after much begging,but all to no avail and he confirmed it that he has made his decision,and he never wanted to see me again. So on one evening,as i was coming back from work,i met an old friend of mine who asked of my husband So i explained every thing to her,so she told me that the only way i can get my husband back,is to visit a spell caster,because it has really worked for her too So i never believed in spell,but i had no other choice,than to follow her advice. Then she gave me the email address of the spell caster whom she visited.(happylovespell2@gmail.com}, So the next morning,i sent a mail to the address she gave to me,and the spell caster assured me that i will get my husband back the next day what an amazing statement!! I never believed,so he spoke with me,and told me everything that i need to do. Then the next morning, So surprisingly, my husband who did not call me for the past seven {2}weeks,gave me a call to inform me that he was coming back So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me and my children. Then from that day,our relationship was now stronger than how it were before,by the help of a spell caster . So, i will advice you out there to kindly visit Dr happy ,if you are in any condition like this,or you have any problem related to "bringing your ex back. So thanks to Dr happy for bringing back my husband,and brought great joy to my family once again. { happylovespell2@gmail.com }, Thanks you Dr happy, i will always be testifying about your good work. also call him on +2348133873774.your spell is really a 100% Guarantee sure and safe

    ReplyDelete
  15. HOW TO RESTORE YOUR BROKEN MARRIAGE
    Life is all about good and bad experience...i was hurting REAL bad when my husband left me but now i can't really believe that i am with my Ex-Husband again and With this little short time and just want to use it in thanking the great man that brought joy back to my life within 48 hours by bringing back my lover. Yes it was true that i had some difficulties with my lover but today i am back here to tell the world that Dr.goodluck brought my lover back to me. I have always heard of love spell but i never had an idea of how effective it can be. Well my time is up just contact Dr.goodluck at his email goodluck05spellcaster@gmail.com and you can also whatapp him or call with his mobile +2349059610309. To enable you have a taste of his great work.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hi everyone, I'm so excited my husband is back after he have left me for another woman, My husband and I have been married for about 7 yrs now. We were happily married with two kids, a boy and a girl. 3 months ago, I started to notice some strange behavior from him and a few weeks later I found out that my husband is seeing someone. He started coming home late from work, he hardly care about me or the kids anymore, Sometimes he goes out and doesn't even come back home for about 2-3 days. I did all I could to rectify this problem but all to no avail. I became very worried and needed help. As I was browsing through the internet one day, I came across a website that suggested that Dr Unity can help solve marital problems, restore broken relationships and so on. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and and told him my problems and he told me what to do and i did it and he did a spell for me. 24 hours later, my husband came to me and apologized for the wrongs he did and promise never to do it again. Ever since then, everything has returned back to normal. I and my family are living together happily again.. All thanks to Dr Unity.If you have any problem contact him and i guarantee you that he will help you. He will not disappoint you. Email him at: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com or call him on: +2348072370762..I am Donna Murray by name and I reside here in United States..Contact Dr.Unity for help via email: Unityspelltemple@gmail.com .

    ReplyDelete
  17. My Husband divorce me for no reason, Thanks to Dr happy for bringing back my husband,and brought me great joy to my family once again, My name is crystal . i live in USA New Jersey, I`m happily married to a lovely and caring husband,with three kids A very big problem occurred in my family 2 weeks ago,between me and my husband so terrible that he took the case to court for a divorce he said that he never wanted to stay with me again,and that he did not love me anymore So he packed out of my house and made me and my children passed through several pain. I tried all my possible means to get him back,after much begging,but all to no avail and he confirmed it that he has made his decision,and he never wanted to see me again. So on one evening,as i was coming back from work,i met an old friend of mine who asked of my husband So i explained every thing to her,so she told me that the only way i can get my husband back,is to visit a spell caster,because it has really worked for her too So i never believed in spell,but i had no other choice,than to follow her advice. Then she gave me the email address of the spell caster whom she visited.(happylovespell2@gmail.com}, So the next morning,i sent a mail to the address she gave to me,and the spell caster assured me that i will get my husband back the next day what an amazing statement!! I never believed,so he spoke with me,and told me everything that i need to do. Then the next morning, So surprisingly, my husband who did not call me for the past seven {2}weeks,gave me a call to inform me that he was coming back So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me and my children. Then from that day,our relationship was now stronger than how it were before,by the help of a spell caster . So, i will advice you out there to kindly visit Dr happy ,if you are in any condition like this,or you have any problem related to "bringing your ex back. So thanks to Dr happy for bringing back my husband,and brought great joy to my family once again. { happylovespell2@gmail.com }, Thanks you Dr happy, i will always be testifying about your good work. also call him on +2348133873774.your spell is really a 100% Guarantee sure and safe

    ReplyDelete
  18. HOW TO RESTORE YOUR BROKEN MARRIAGE
    I will start by saying to all that have experience heart break and also can't do without their lover should please stop here and read up my story, So as you will know how to go solving or getting your ex back...Am writing this article to appreciate the good work of Dr GOODLUCK that helped me recently to bring back my fiance. My fiance broke up with me last three month because he thought i was cheating on him, so for the past three month now i have trying to plead with him but he still say the same thing that he does not want us to come back again that he can not trust me so i came in contact with Dr GOODLUCK, who told me that my lover is going to come back to me if i work with him so i did what he ask me to do,after that he will call me that within 17 hours that my lover is going to come back to me,can you believe that my lover is back to me ,he now love me more than before i am so happy, spell is good when you meet Dr GOODLUCK if you need his help contact him at his email goodluck05spellcaster@gmail.com and you can also whatapp him or call with his mobile +2349059610309 and i promise that he is going to help you with any problem OKay...

    ReplyDelete
  19. I just want to give a quick advise to any one out there that is having difficulty in his or her relationship to contact Dr.Agbazara because he is the only one that is capable to bring back broken relationship or broken marriages within time limit of 48 hours. You can contact Dr.Agbazara by calling him on his mobile +2348104102662 or write him through his email at ( agbazara@gmail.com )

    ReplyDelete
  20. Just few weeks ago I saw a comment about Dr. Ekpen Temple, someone talking about how he has help him in his relationship break up, I also contacted him because i was facing the same problem in my relationship, today i can boldly recommend Dr. Ekpen Temple to someone who is also facing break up in his or her relationship to contact him for help today because he has help me restore my relationship back to normal, here is he contact details (ekpentemple@gmail.com) or WHATSAPP him on +2347050270218

    ReplyDelete