THE PROBLEMS WITH NOVELS: The problem with the omission of Geer!


Part 3—Picking and choosing examples:
John Geer was shot and killed by a Fairfax County, Virginia policeman in August 2013.

At this time, police shootings were becoming very hot in the national "press corps." In many ways, the shooting of Geer was especially egregious. Consider:

Geer was shot and killed, in broad daylight, as he stood in the doorway to him home in the Washington suburbs. He wasn't holding a gun. His hands were raised above his head. See yesterday's report.

Five police officers were present that day. One of the officers shot Geer through the chest. The other four officers all testified that there had been no reason to fire the shot. Civilian eyewitnesses agreed.

The testimony of the four officers made this case especially striking. But good grief! Despite the striking circumstances, the Fairfax police stonewalled the case for well over a year.

They refused to release the name of the officer who had fired the fatal shot. They "refused to cooperate with state and federal prosecutors who wanted to examine Torres's personnel files," the Washington Post later said.

In many ways, this unfortunate case should have qualified as an instant classic. As noted, it came at a time when the national press was feigning deep interest in the topic of police shootings.

Despite these facts, very few people have ever heard of John Geer. The names of several other shooting victims are known all over the country, as is appropriate. But no one has heard of Geer.

This helps us see where novels come from. It also helps us see the problems which may arise when the people who pose as our "journalists" choose to traffic in novels.

Everyone has heard of Michael Brown; this is completely appropriate. Why has no one heard of Geer? Presumably, the answer is obvious:

When Officer Torres shot and killed Geer, he killed someone who is classified within our culture as "white." This example would have undermined the press corps' prevailing novel, which dealt with the killing of people who are classified as "black."

In line with this novelization, the Geer example was disappeared. Other examples were broadcast far and wide—sometimes with basic facts rearranged, dropped or embellished, in service to preferred story-lines.

When a "press corps" picks and chooses its examples this way, it may create a convincing novel—a novel which is morally pleasing. But it also may mislead the public about the real facts of real life.

Just yesterday, we saw Gene Robinson, on TV, pretending that he can't think of any examples of the Geer type. When "journalists" lie to the public that way, enormous harm may be done.

At this point, we're going to make our first recourse to statistics. Once again, this will involve the Washington Post, the newspaper for which Robinson, the Morning Joe star, pretends to work as a journalist.

Last year, the Washington Post performed an extremely rare act. It engaged in a genuine act of journalism, for which it was appropriately awarded a Pulitzer prize.

To its vast credit, the Post compiled a record of all fatal police shootings around the nation in 2015. Under previous procedures, even the FBI lacked such statistics, as Comey the God had acknowledged, displaying his manifest greatness.

The Post compiled a list of fatal police shootings around the nation. A wonderful irony arose from this project, an irony which captures the way our "journalists" work as they pretend to inform us.

That irony was this:

The Post was awarded a Pulitzer prize for compiling those important statistics. But when journalists pretend to discuss this ongoing topic, the Post's most basic statistics are almost never cited.

Below, you see some basic data from the Post's compilation. Conservatives have started to cite these statistics in the past week:
Victims of fatal police shootings by race, 2015
Whites: 494
Blacks: 258
Hispanics: 172
For all Post data, click here.

The Post has continued to perform this important journalistic service in 2016. So far this year, last year's ratio has again obtained. So far, police officers have shot and killed approximately twice as many whites as blacks in the year 2016.

Is that a significant fact? Does it tell us anything about the degree to which the shootings of blacks may stem from racial bias?

On its own, that ratio can't tell us that—but it's a very basic statistic. That said, it's a fact the public rarely hears, in line with the press corps' enduring love for its ongoing novel.

Today, in cursory fashion, we've discussed two different ways in which the press corps can fashion a novel:

The press corps can pick and choose its examples. It can feed us a steady stream of one type of example, while disappearing examples of some other kind.

The press corps can also withhold the basic statistics which may complicate its preferred story-line. In each of these ways, the public may come to have a false impression about the way the world works.

Tomorrow, we'll start to look at a third way the press corps can fashion a novel. We'll even quote Candidate Clinton, a non-journalist, as she comes extremely close to telling the public a lie.

We'll also start to look at other relevant statistics. We'll mention that new research—research which suggests that common understandings of police shootings may in fact be inaccurate.

We'll do those things tomorrow. For today, we'll mention one possible problem with novels:

Last Thursday night, an unbalanced person opened fire in Dallas. Tomorrow, we'll pose a question we wish he had been asked.

Almost surely, many people have been misled by the press corps' latest novel. Was the killer one such person?

One of the problems with press corps novels is the fact that this is an obvious question. Beyond that, as we all know, it's a question which won't be asked.

Tomorrow: A possible survey question


  1. Thanks for posting those statistics. Would it be relevant to point out that blacks comprise about 12 to 15% of the population?

    1. What's the math on that? How do you figure out the ratios?

    2. Would it also be relevant to point out that blacks commit more than 50% of crimes despite their smaller % of the population?

    3. I'd like to know the rich/poor ratios.

    4. 10:45 is right to ask that question. The answer: Of course, it's relevant.

      Somerby doesn't come close to saying that it /isn't/ relevant.

      What he says -- what's undeniable -- is that the basic statistics, the raw numbers, on police killings by race "complicate" a narrative that's been prevalent in the media.

      It may be relevant as well, @10:45, to ask: Is there a reason the press so studiously avoid such "complication?"

    5. @10:54:

      Here is info about that:

  2. Yesterday I saw that new research being discussed in comments on a different blog. Someone said "You don't believe anything that comes out of Harvard University, do you?" What makes Somerby think anyone is going to be convinced by facts?

    Last week on local news there was a story about a woman arrested for getting three speeding tickets within an hour. Each time she was stopped she had been going more than 90 mph. She said she was arrested for being black.

    1. I saw you arrested three times for urinating in public.

  3. Will anyone in the media point out that Micah X. Johnson was murdered for exercising his 2nd Amendment right to fight the tyranny of the government?
    Probably not, because we live in a PC world, where we can't speak the truth because it might hurt the feelings of certain groups (in this case, White people and Police officers).

    1. I smell essence of troll.

    2. Seems those rights were way more important when we were trying to keep classrooms of 6-year olds from being shot to death.

  4. I've been reading about the questionable shooting of a youth in California as he lay prone on the street. I don't know what he was ethnically, but he wasn't black. His name was Dylan Noble, so even if he wasn't Irish, he may not have been Hispanic, either. It's all over the place, somehow seeping through the monolithic Press blackout by which Truth is kept from the masses who don't frequent this blog.

    In the 2015 stats cited above, twice as many non-Hispanic whites were fatally shot as blacks. But blacks are only about 12 percent of the populace while non-H whites are what -- 70 percent? Six times as many? Nothing to see here, folks. Move along. The Press is just being lazy. Follow me as I draw your attention to some anecdotal exceptions certain to invalidate even the most persistent storylines.

    I'm sure the real explanation here is that Black Americans have made themselves more technologically adept than their white counterparts, ever having their cell phones at the ready when the inevitable white-upon-black atrocity occurs. Indeed,the last time I saw a cop shoot a white guy for no good reason, I was busy trading pounds for euros and booking a room at the Manchebo Beach Resort in Aruba. By the time I had clumsily managed to switch to livestreaming, the incriminating event had been concluded and the cover-up begun.

    Could it possibly be that police shootings of blacks get more attention not because of Press novelizing, but because blacks are quicker on the draw? Ooh, please pardon the poor choice of words.

    1. There is both bystander video and cop video of the shooting of Dylan Noble. The bystander video doesn't show the whole event, so perhaps the bystander did fumble with his phone as you describe, Aruba or not.

      Blacks are 12% of the population but account for more than 50% of the crime statistics. That would make whites over-represented among those shot. The Harvard study makes the appropriate adjustments and calls the rates proportionate.

      Perhaps you are unaware that whites are overrepresented in suicide statistics compared to blacks. Dylan Noble appeared to have been committing suicide-by-cop, if you believe news reports at all. After a car chase in which he refused to stop for cops, he refused to put his hands up and exit the truck, then behaved as if he had a gun in his waistband, refusing to raise both hands but always hiding one. This is according to the cop story (which does have video of the entire event). He supposed said "I hate my effing life" before coming quickly toward the cops, again hiding one hand. Yes, this is the cop version of events, but there is video of the entire event on the police recording. Much is being made of the fact that the police have not yet made public that video. The bystander video shows him raising his arms off the ground before being shot two more times (again failing to comply with police instructions).

      I continue to find your humorous tone annoying. Death isn't funny and the grief of friends and relatives deserves respect, even if you didn't know these people and apparently don't care much about them.

  5. Dear Bob Somerby,

    I thought you might be interested in this piece from Jacobin, which would seem to align with what you're writing about police shootings:

    I will start by saying to all that have experience heart break and also can't do without their lover should please stop here and read up my story, So as you will know how to go solving or getting your ex back...Am writing this article to appreciate the good work of Dr GOODLUCK that helped me recently to bring back my fiance. My fiance broke up with me last three month because he thought i was cheating on him, so for the past three month now i have trying to plead with him but he still say the same thing that he does not want us to come back again that he can not trust me so i came in contact with Dr GOODLUCK, who told me that my lover is going to come back to me if i work with him so i did what he ask me to do,after that he will call me that within 17 hours that my lover is going to come back to me,can you believe that my lover is back to me ,he now love me more than before i am so happy, spell is good when you meet Dr GOODLUCK if you need his help contact him at his email and you can also whatapp him or call with his mobile +2349059610309 and i promise that he is going to help you with any problem OKay..

  7. was searching for help on the internet to get my ex lover whom will got divorced back, i came across this wonderful man called DR.AGBAZARA of AGBAZARA TEMPLE who did a nice job by helping me to get my divorced husband back within 48hours.. I never believe that such things like this can be possible but now i am a living testimony to it because AGBAZARA TEMPLE actually brought my lover back, If you are having any relationship problems why not contact DR.AGBAZARA TEMPLE via email on: ( ) OR on ( ), Then i promise you that after 48hours you will have reasons to celebrate like me.