YEAR(S) IN REVIEW: Utter dismay in Tinton Falls!

SATURDAY, DECEMBER 31, 2016

Conclusion—Those by whom you've been failed:
Last Sunday—it was Christmas morning—Name Withheld was pulling very few punches.

Her letter, to the New York Times Book Review, came from Tinton Falls, New Jersey, a borough in Monmouth County. We reprint that letter in full:
To the Editor:

I was utterly dismayed when I read the list of the 10 Best Books of the year. This is the worst selection in over 40 years. However, I should not have been surprised, as I have been very disappointed in the Book Review for some time.

Name Withheld
TINTON FALLS, N.J.
We're not sure why you'd publish that letter. But publish that letter they did!

On that same day, the Book Review published responses by 47 people to a hard-hitting year's-end question.

"In this season of giving," the Book Review said, "we asked some notably avid readers—who also happen to be poets, musicians, diplomats, filmmakers, novelists, actors and artists—to share the books that accompanied them through 2016."

Hours north of Tinton Falls, at least one reader had an uncharitable reaction to the sharing which ensued.

"These are the notably avid readers who failed us through all these year(s)," this tough-talking analyst said.

On the penultimate page of that same Book Review, The Year in Reading 47 were joined by The Bookends 16, who'd been asked a similar question.

"All those avid readers and not a drop to drink," one underwhelmed thought leader said.

Down through the years, these are (among) the many people who failed you! In fairness, we counted fourteen of The Year(s)' End 63 who found a way to signal membership in the club by saying how awful this past year has been. But we found very few notably avid readers who went even one step past that.

At the start of that Book Review section, Open Book columnist John Williams discussed his own year in reading. This is the way he began:
WILLIAMS (12/25/16): This year we asked some notable writers, musicians, actors and others to tell us about their year in reading.

I started the year vowing, arbitrarily, to read more philosophy. If this sounds overly ambitious, that’s only because it was. After chewing on just a bit of Kant and an even smaller bit of Hegel, I satisfied my appetite with something more digestible: “Irrational Man,” by William Barrett, a 1958 primer on existentialism’s roots and branches that might pair well with one of our 10 Best Books of 2016, Sarah Bakewell’s “At the Existentialist Café.”
"The foppishness is everywhere," at least one reader said.

For ourselves, the Bakewell book may have been the most memorable book of the year. That said, we found it memorable due to its highly instructive and world-class complete total incoherence.

Needless to say, this caused reviewers all over the world to praise the book's lucidity. Inevitably, this caused the Times to pick it as one of the year's ten best!

In Tinton Falls, one tough-talking reader pushed back hard. But make no mistake:

The Times had assembled a gaggle of giants to discuss The Year in Reading. Over the past twenty-five years, these are the people who didn't have a thing to say about the trends which have now produced the ascent of Donald J. Trump.

The foppishness was general as we read Sunday's Book Review. So were the scripted howls about this extremely bad year, which gave at least one avid reader "a feeling akin to seasickness."

Or so this reader said.

Next week, we'll start up again; we may start with the pleasing phrase, "mass poisoning of the entire city." That said, a bottom line is already clear. Simply put, our self-impressed tribe simply lacks the tools to perform on the national stage.

Some may suspect this in Tinton Falls. Possibly nowhere else.

18 comments:

  1. "Over the past twenty-five years, these are the people who didn't have a thing to say about the trends which have now produced the ascent of Donald J. Trump."

    A lot of people had a great deal to say about the ascent of Donald Trump. If they didn't attribute it explicitly to the causes Somerby explores, they fought those forces vigorously, in all media.

    They are now being reviled for being elitists. Isn't it enough punishment that they lost and now we have Trump?

    I don't like the books the NY Times tells me to read either. I chalk that up to my own tastes, not to a general decline in the functioning of the intelligentsia. The golden age in NYC disappeared when rents became too high to be affordable by bohemians. It has been all downhill since then.

    NY went for Hillary -- in spite of the NY Times best efforts. Few people read the paper outside NY these days. Maybe Somerby should be criticizing all those papers in Michigan and Wisconsin and PA? They may not be foppish, but I'm sure they have done other things to contribute to the triumph of fake news in the mainstream media.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Many small town papers reprint columns by the NY Times editorial page writers and NY Times news reports, which is part of the reason the Times is still so influential (and a part of our media problem).

      Delete
    2. "part of the reason the Times is still so influential (and a part of our media problem).'

      Rubbish. I see few newspapers as being "influential." The non-voters and third party nihilists which enabled Trump have little to do with the NYT.

      Delete
    3. I see things differently, I guess.

      Delete
    4. "Blind fools usually do" see things differently from the all-wise Lewis C, who is here to tell you don't forget about those smaller papers and when you don't forget them, remember too that they're not influenced by the NY Times, fools!

      Delete
    5. "The non-voters and third party nihilists which enabled Trump have little to do with the NYT."

      I agree with Lewis.

      It doesn't matter whether the NY Times articles were printed in smaller papers if those papers were not read and didn't influence the people who decided not to vote for Hillary.

      Out of all the papers in the US, only 1 (Sheldon Adelson's paper in LV) endorsed Trump. Who won? Trump. Shall we conclude that papers are influential? On what basis?

      Delete
  2. "our self-impressed tribe"

    Speak for yourself. You're a 3rd-rate Howard Beale.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Self-impressed is a word that applies most to Donald Trump, not to liberals. It may apply to NY Times columnists but I don't think it applies to the many men and women who are gravely concerned about what will happen now that Trump is elected.

      I don't think Somerby is showing much empathy for them. That makes it offensive when he is so very concerned about the people who did this to us all. They at least got the president they voted for.

      Delete
    2. The word Somerby applies to liberals is dumb.

      Delete
  3. "The foppishness is everywhere." These people praise books that are incoherent and create social battles where no serious problem exists. It's all about wearing a fashionable politics and signaling wonderful-personnness to other tribe members through avatar filters. The advent of Trump has them deliriously satisfied in one respect for the opportunity to emote about imagined persecution of others they can proclaim they "stand with."

    Whatever anyone thinks about Trump, watching someone win with every major media star opposing him was worth any downside especially after 8 years of Democrats, including their candidate, standing for nothing but lobbing "RACIST" and the other libels. Voters figured out that it wouldn't matter if Trump never said anything objectionable, anyone opposing Obama and then Hillary was going to be smeared as a racist sexist whateverophobe and the election of Trump was a long overdue middle finger to that tactic. Trump might not be a better president than Hillary but he won't be worse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hate to sound like an elitist, but you don't know what foppish means, do you?

      Delete
    2. The thing about elitists is they're usually foppish yet dumb, not actually elite in any way they imagine. You do sound like one.

      Delete
    3. And yet you still don't know what foppish means!

      Delete
    4. Foppish means having a tendency to fop.

      Sorry, I love bad jokes. Benny Hill is my hero

      Delete
  4. Trump's triumph is in large part due to the media's self destruction of it's credibility. No one believes in the media as a source of accurate news. Trump did not do this to them. He just used it against them and devised a way to get out his message without them. About all thats left for the media is to sit on the sidelines spitting and sputtering as events pass them by. Their access to Trump is pretty much limited to reading his tweets.

    Could not have happened to a more deserving bunch of people.

    ReplyDelete
  5. How i got my Husband back Thanks to Lord Alika for bringing back my Husband ,and brought great joy to my family??? My name is Kathryn Louise, My Ex-Husband dumped me two weeks ago after I accused him of seeing someone else and insulting him. I want him back in my life but he refuse to have any contact with me. I was so confuse and don't know what to do, so I reach to the internet for help and I saw a testimony of how a spell caster help people to get their ex back so I contact the spell caster and explain my problem to him and he cast a spell for me and assure me of 48hours that my ex will return to me and to my greatest surprise the third day my ex came knocking on my door and beg for forgiveness. I am so happy that my love is back again and not only that, we are about to get married. Once again thank you Lord Alika , You are truly talented and gifted. Web:http://lordalikaspelltemp8.Wix.Com/http is the only answer. He can be of great help and I will not stop publishing him because he is a wonderful man.Email: lordalikaspelltemple@yahoo.Co.Uk or +19287694882. Web:http://lordalikaspelltemp8.Wix.Com/http

    ReplyDelete
  6. My ex and I were together for 5 years. We lived together and were engaged. We went on a trip with friends and his family and had a nasty fight and broke up. We both moved out of our home and with our parents. We decided to go no contact for a month and 2 weeks in he started dating a girl and took her on a trip to California ( where we’ve gone the last 2 years on my bday) on my birthday weekend! After battling it out thru emails and a few meetings we finally came to see each other all of last week, i love him so much and i was so desperate to have him back coz i new that girl was not the right person for him so i have to save my relationship and reunite with me ex again so i try all i could to bring him back but all to avail i have be in contact with so many spell caster who only too my money and still nothing good work out of it, i ws so confuse and devastated one day trying to search on facebook, i come across a wonderful testimony of a lady on how a spell caster who she contacted also for love spell help her and bring her husband back to her with-in less day 2 days after the spell i was so fill with joy coz this lady meant my day and i regain my hope back so i directly and desperately email http://happyspelltemple.webs.com/ coz i love my ex so much and i want him back all to my self so with-in 5 min,Dr happy email me back with hope and told me that i have found solution in him that i should worried no more so i did all he ask of me and he gave me assured and guarantee that my ex will come back so i believed and was so gifted all to my surprise after the spell my ex call, come to my working beg and apology for his mistake,and he said sorry for the nasty break up that he was inconsiderate of my feelings nt in tend to hurt me. i can testify with the power love spell of Dr happy me and my ex are happily married now thank you Dr happy i will for ever be grateful to you and keep sharing your testimony if you need help or love spell fine it difficult to get back with your ex, email happylovespell2@gmail.com or call his mobile number on +2348133873774

    ReplyDelete