The Manchurian (Vice Presidential) Candidate!

THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2024

We still say, Pity the child: A few years back—we're not sure how many—we watched The Manchurian Candidate (1962 version) maybe four or five times.

We came away thinking that it's a very deep, complex film. More and more, we find ourselves thinking about that film as we watch JD Vance in action.

We still recommend that you pity the child—the child who grew up in the profoundly dysfunctional family culture Vance described in his best-selling 2017 memoir, Hillbilly Elegy.

After Vance was selected to run for vice president, we scanned his memoir again. It wasn't as well written as some people are inclined to say, but it describes a culture of neglect and abuse dumped on the head of a child,

That child grew up to be JD Vance, who increasingly strikes us as one of the biggest demagogues we've ever seen. 

As we noted as the time of the Republican Convention, childhood trauma, and resident anger, may emerge later in life.

Is that what's happening in the matter described below? Dual headline included, this is the start of a New York Times news report:

Vance Says He Will Keep Calling Haitians Legally in Springfield ‘Illegal’
The immigrants are mainly in the United States under temporary protected status, which the executive branch can grant to people whose home countries are in crisis.

Senator JD Vance of Ohio, the Republican vice-presidential nominee, said on Wednesday that he would continue to describe Haitian residents in Springfield, Ohio, as “illegal aliens” even though most of them are in the country legally.

The immigrants are mainly in the United States under a program called temporary protected status, which the executive branch can grant to people whose home countries are in crisis. Mr. Vance claimed falsely that this program was illegal.

“If Kamala Harris waves the wand illegally and says these people are now here legally, I’m still going to call them an illegal alien,” he said in response to a reporter’s question after a rally in Raleigh, N.C. “An illegal action from Kamala Harris does not make an alien legal.”

Pity the child—but defeat the man! Increasingly, he strikes us as thoroughly damaged.

Increasingly, there seems to be nothing this guy won't say, especially on TV. For example, are Springfield's Haitians in this country thanks to "an illegal action from Kamala Harris?" 

That's what Vance is quoted saying in the Times report. We highlight one particular statement as the report continues:

Congress created the temporary protected status program in 1990 and presidents from both major parties have used it in response to wars, natural disasters and other humanitarian crises in various countries. The program allows people from countries designated by the Department of Homeland Security to live and work legally in the United States for 18 months, a period that the department can renew indefinitely. It does not include a path to permanent residency or citizenship.

The Obama administration granted the temporary protected status to Haitians living in the United States illegally after a 7.0-magnitude earthquake devastated Haiti in January 2010. Under President Biden, the Department of Homeland Security has granted or renewed temporary protected status to immigrants from a number of countries, including Haiti, Ukraine and Venezuela. Ms. Harris did not make those decisions.

Interesting! The Obama administration made a decision concerning Haitians in 2010.  Under President Biden, the Department of Homeland Security made certain additional decisions concerning Haitians.

"Ms. Harris did not make those decisions," the Times report says. As a general matter, that may be the most obvious observation available in the world. 

Duh! As a general matter, vice presidents don't call the shots! That's a blindingly obvious observation, but much of our journalistic discourse is devoted to blowing right past it when vice presidents run for the White House.

That said, no one plays this particular card quite like Candidate Vance. Here he was at the start of his interview with CNN's Dana Bash on last Sunday's State of the Union:

BASH (9/15/24): Before Donald Trump talked about eating dogs and cats on a debate stage, it was you, Senator, who first elevated this baseless rumor. These are your constituents. So, why are you putting them at risk by continuing to spread claims about Haitian immigrants, despite officials in your state saying that there's no evidence and pleading for you to stop?

VANCE: Well, Dana, first of all, what's putting the residents of Springfield at risk, which was a town completely ignored by the American media until Donald Trump and I started surfacing some of these concerns, is that they can't afford housing, they can't afford health care.

The schools have been overwhelmed. The hospitals have been overwhelmed. And they're overwhelmed because Kamala Harris allowed 20,000 Haitian migrants to get dropped into a small Ohio town of about 40,000 people, and it's completely overwhelmed the services. 

That was the first Q-and-A! Just like that, right out of the box, Vance was saying that Springfield is overwhelmed "because Kamala Harris allowed 20,000 Haitian migrants to get dropped into" that city.

During the interview, Vance played that card early and extremely often, as we'll show you below. But while we're at it, when was Springfield ever "a small Ohio town of about 40,000 people?" Here are the recent figures from the Census Bureau:

Population of Springfield, Ohio
2000 census: 65,358
2010 census: 60,608
2020 census: 58,662
2023 estimate: 58,082

Springfield is located in the state Vance represents in the Seate. When did its population drop all the way down to 40,000? Inquiring minds want to know!

At any rate, are some unknown number of Haitians living in Springfield, Ohio "because Kamala Harris allowed it?" In his session with Bash, Vance quickly cast himself in the victim's role, then proceeded to play that card again and again and again.

Seriously! Here's what he soon said:

VANCE: What we have said is that this town has suffered terribly under the problem—under the policies of Kamala Harris. Now, you just accused me of inciting violence against the community, when all that I have done is surface the complaints of my constituents, people who are suffering because of Kamala Harris' policies.

Are we not allowed to talk about these problems because some psychopaths are threatening violence? We can condemn the violence on the one hand, but also talk about the terrible consequences of Kamala Harris' open border on the other hand.

Now, let me just fact-check a couple of other things that you said, Dana, because it's important. You said that all of these migrants are in the country legally. They're in the country through what's called temporary protective status.

BASH: Right.

VANCE: That is when Kamala Harris waved a magic amnesty wand, taking people and giving them legal status. That is not a—that is not to say that they're here legally. That is a terrible indictment of her amnesty policies that have further opened the border and further caused terrible migration into this country.

BASH: But they're not—but it's not illegal. You might be—you might not agree with the policy and, obviously you don't, which is totally fair and legitimate. There are policy disagreements all the time. But the fact is, it is the law because President Biden and Vice President Harris are—

VANCE: Dana— The point is, Dana—

BASH: But I don't want to get— I don't want to, frankly, go down this conversation about policy, because—

VANCE: No, no, no, Dana, I— I— You made—you made a point. You don't—I agree, you don't want to talk about policy, Dana, which is why you're talking about other distractions, instead of about the fact that—

BASH: No, what I want to talk about—what I want to talk about— Senator, it was your distraction! You were the one who started talking about eating dogs and cats.

VANCE: —Kamala Harris, Dana, granted amnesty at a mass level. She granted amnesty at a mass level.

He said it and said it and said it again. Every decision of the past four years was made by Kamala Harris! 

Candidate Vance kept this up all the way to end of the session. Believe it or not, "murders are up by 81 percent because of what Kamala Harris has allowed to happen to this small community!" 

When you get right down to it, there's very little that Kamala Harris hasn't specifically done! Bash never challenged this sleight of hand. There was no sign that she even noticed.

In our view, one major problem was working here—Vance is quite good at this sort of thing. In our view, Bash unwisely began interrupting and arguing with Vance, but he's more skillful at this game. It's like the old saw about the wrestling match:

You don't want to get into a wrestling match with a pig. You'll each get muddy, but the pig will like it.

In The Manchurian Candidate, Raymond Shaw gets dragged away and gets brainwashed by the Chinese Communists. He has his soul (almost) taken away. The Frank Sinatra character sees that he deserves to be pitied.

It looks to us like a certain person emerged from a profoundly dysfunctional upbringing but, as it seems to have turned out, he didn't emerge unscathed.

We'll suggest that you pity the child. But we get the feeling that a whole lot of damage was done to that child and that it has begun to emerge.

Final point:

Looking back at that Times report, how many of the Haitians in Springfield, Ohio were actually in this country "illegally" when protected status was first declared back in 2010?

("The Obama administration granted the temporary protected status to Haitians living in the United States illegally after a 7.0-magnitude earthquake devastated Haiti in January 2010.")

The Times report blows past that question. Because facts are no longer a part of our discourse, the answer will never emerge. 


57 comments:

  1. I cannot recall an election where there was more lying by all four candidates. Tim Walz told this amazing lie:
    “Trump is trying to create this new government entity that will monitor all pregnancies to enforce their abortion bans.”

    Not only did Trump never say this, he repeatedly has said that abortion should be handled by the states. So, Trump's statements show opposition to a federal agency to have anything to do with abortions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trump is a well-known truth teller, is that what you’re saying, DiC? Whatever happened to that wonderful new healthcare system that he promised us in 2016?
      …?

      Delete
    2. Kavanaugh, Alito, and Thomas ALL said Roe vs. Wade was settled law.
      That's how you know Roe vs Wade is still the law of the land.
      You did hear them declare it was settled law, right David?
      BTW, don't respond to me until tomorrow, I'm going out on the town tonight, for dinner and a dozen abortions.

      Delete
    3. David in Cal,
      The USA is great. Don't let some Loser, who is being blackmailed by Vladamir Putin, convince you otherwise.

      Delete
    4. will monitor all pregnancies to enforce

      He selected JD Vance as his VP who argued while in the Senate in favor of police monitoring women's menstrual cycles. That's what Dickhead would call "smaller government".

      Delete
    5. That's hard to believe. Do you have a link, @7:34?

      Delete
    6. DIC is shocked, I tell ya, he is shocked:

      https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-vance-abortion-surveil-pregnant-women-1235072063/

      Delete
    7. The easiest thing to do when DiC makes these claims is to ask him if it would make any difference if he is proven wrong.

      Delete
  2. Here are a million reasons to vote for Trump. Trump prevented Russia from invading Ukraine. A million people are dead who would probably be alive if Trump had won the 2020 election.
    https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/1-million-casualties-ukraine-war-1-deadliest-european-history-212787

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What would have happened to Ukraine if Trump had won, David?

      Delete
    2. Putin was unwilling to invade Ukraine when Trump was President. So, I think Putin would also have been unwilling to invade Ukraine if Trump had been re-elected.

      Delete
    3. What does Trump have to do with it?

      Delete
    4. Putin feared Trump. He didn't fear Biden. I doubt that Putin fears Harris.

      Delete
    5. Why do you believe Putin feared Trump?

      Delete
    6. Putin's actions show that he feared Trump. He invaded Ukraine when Obama was President. He invaded Ukraine when Biden was President. OTOH he left Ukraine alone when Trump was President.

      Why fear Trump? Trump showed a willingness to take actions formerly unthinkable. One was moving our Embassy to Jerusalem. This move was actually required by law, but all former Presidents chose not to move Our Embassy.

      Another example: Trump approved the assassination of General Soleimani, someone who richly deserved to be killed.

      Delete
    7. Trump did not prevent anything. That's entirely speculation on your part. Putin "feared" Trump? That's just nuts.

      Delete
    8. "A million people are dead who would probably be alive if Trump had won the 2020 election."

      Here's a question: if Putin feared Trump so much, if Putin wanted to invade Ukraine but couldn't because Trump was in office, then why did Russia continue to work on Trump's behalf in 2020?

      That literally destroys your theory. But it won't change your mind.

      https://www.npr.org/2021/03/16/977958302/intelligence-report-russia-tried-to-help-trump-in-2020-election

      Delete
    9. David,
      Has Trump said what he would do to keep police officers and other gun-owners from selling/ trading/ giving guns to criminal on the black market?

      Delete
    10. J.D,.Vance is no more responsible for bomb threats in Ohio, than he is for all the pregnant women who have died because they can't get medical treatment for ectopic pregnancies.

      Delete
    11. @7:02 Not to my knowledge. Of course selling/ trading/ giving guns to criminals on the black market is already illegal.

      Delete
    12. Hector, how does that destroy the theory? Putin could have helped Trump in 2020 for lots of different reasons. You seem to think the only reason could have is because was to show he didn't fear Trump? So his plan was to help Trump get elected and then invade Ukraine? Could Putin not have preferred Trump's foreign policy approach compared to Biden's confrontational approach? Or felt a preference for the uncertainty Trump created globally or the perceived weaknesses in U.S. alliances under his leadership? Or maybe that Trump's second term would continue to divide the country which would continue to weaken U.S. institutions?

      The Russian interference of 2020 does not really directly correlate with the idea of fear or non-fear of Trump. Does it?

      Delete
    13. Trump is opposed to providing Ukraine with what it needs to defend itself, so no, Putin does not fear Trump. In fact it’s just the opposite, Trump is Putin’s puppet.

      Trump often engages in fear mongering about a nuclear attack (Trump says it’s the biggest threat to manufacturing jobs, what a genius!), in contrast to Biden, who stands strong against obvious bluffs from the likes of Putin. In reality, during Trump’s reign, Putin had his way, whereas under Biden, Putin has been exposed as a paper tiger and is getting his ass handed to him.

      Trump is weak; Harris swatted him around like a plaything in the debate.

      Trump recently met with Netanyahu and told him to “finish the job” in reference to the genocide of the Palestinians, which is likely the same thing he would say to Putin concerning Ukraine.

      If Trump were to be re elected (idk suppose Harris gets abducted by a UFO) Putin would take possession of Ukraine, and probably Poland after, and more after that. Netanyahu would take possession of Gaza and the West Bank and try for Lebanon too. True, these wouldn’t be wars, Trump would just let them walk all over him and the US and take whatever they want.

      Having said that, notably, there were more American military deaths under Trump than with Biden. So while Trump quakes in his lifted boots over authoritarian leaders, he’s doing no favors to those that serve in the military (he thinks those that died in war protecting us, are losers and suckers).

      Trump is all lies and bluster; he recently went on Gutfeld and said the audience attending the debate went crazy in response to his performance, except there was no audience. Then Trump made up a story that Walz called him because his house was surrounded by protestors, but this never happened, Walz only spoke with Trump when Trump called him to thank Walz because he did a good job in handling the Floyd riot, with Walz calling out the National Guard (Trump made up this story to explain why he praised Walz, similar to how he just made up a new path for that hurricane with his Sharpie).

      Wounded lost souls like DIC (and Somerby) feel threatened and intimated by women and people of color, so they cling to con men like Trump, hoping Trump will act like a personal bodyguard and soothe their emotional discomfort from having their dominance challenged. But Trump is not up for the job, he’s a weak old man with a billion grievances and a prison term he is desperate to avoid, shirking personal responsibility, a common trait among most right wingers.

      Delete
    14. 9:23 You probably meant “intimidated”.

      Trump’s day of being “intimate” with a woman are long over, and he strictly avoids any intimacy with a person of color.

      9:06 you torture reasoning unnecessarily, the relatively bone simple point is, if Putin feared Trump then it is highly unlikely that he would support Trump in the manner that he does. Putin does not fear Trump, it’s a laughable notion. Americans fear Trump because he seems ready and willing to put our country at risk for his own personal benefit.

      Delete
    15. 9:23 - what do you think of Hector's logic that Putin was not afraid of Trump because Russia continued to work in his favor during the 2020 election? Isn't a claim that foreign interference can be motivated solely by fear or confidence in a specific future action like an invasion is kind of an unique and original form of reasoning? What say you?

      Delete
    16. 9:34 I'm glad to see we agree that the point is bone simple and lacks complexity.

      Delete
    17. "Could Putin not have preferred Trump's foreign policy approach compared to Biden's confrontational approach?"

      Of course he did. But that question is better directed at David in Cal, not me.

      DIC is the one who made the obscenely stupid statement that one million Ukrainians and Russians would be alive now if Trump had won in 2020 (because Putin would have been quaking in his boots at an addle-brained dissembler in a red ball cap).

      Delete
    18. Yes, I saw that but was just curious about the reasoning of you response. If you say now of course Putin preferred Trump's foreign policy approach, could that not be the reason he supported him in 2020? And possibly fear or lack thereof did not factor at all?

      Delete
    19. From a diplomacy standpoint, Trump prevented Putin from invading Russia and Biden did not which was a diplomatic failure on Biden's part. Both had the agency of being the most powerful men in the world.

      Delete
    20. Hector in the Basement 😂

      What kind of insecure fag posts under multiple nyms?

      Delete
    21. 10:20 Makes perfect sense. Putin meddled in the 2020 election, promoting Trump, in order that if/when Trump was in office, Putin's fear of Trump would prevent him from invading Ukraine. And when Trump lost, Putin couldn't control himself , invading Ukraine. When Trump then called him brilliant for doing so, that was code for Trump saying it was brilliant to do so when Trump wasn't president because if he had won the election and Putin then invaded, there would have been hell to pay. Trump is like a sponsor in AA for Putin. Whenever he thinks about invading another country he wishes that he could call the White House and Donald would answer the phone and talk him off the ledge by threatening him, a tactic which always works with Putin. He knows himself so well that without Trump to fear he realizes that he is self-destructive. Hence the ongoing meddling in this election to get Trump elected. Putin realizes that Trump is the only one who will stand in the way of his self-destructive ambition to acquire more territory in Eastern Europe.

      Such is the magical thinking of DIC and his ilk.

      Delete
    22. “an addle-brained dissembler in a red ball cap”

      That’s good. That’s very good.

      Delete
    23. Over 1 million casualties? Over 600,000 of those are Russian soldiers. If only Putin had feared Biden, he wouldn’t have suffered those massive casualties.

      Delete
    24. "Of course selling/ trading/ giving guns to criminals on the black market is already illegal."
      The selling of guns to criminals is a huge side hustle for cops and other gun owners.

      Delete
    25. That's exactly why I'm voting for Dr. Jill Stein.

      Delete
    26. Check it out, David in Cal.
      Trump is such a Loser, that people are voting for the other Russian-backed Presidential candidate (Jill Stein), rather than him.

      Delete
    27. Check it out - people are voting for Democrats not realizing Democrats spent the last 15 years turning into Republicans. Supporters of Democrats are voting for Republicans and they don't even know it. As Liz Cheney said of Harris's' convention speech "“It is a speech Ronald Reagan could have given ... it is a speech George Bush could have given."

      Delete
    28. Idiot, try again.

      Delete
    29. Democrats spent the last 15 years turning into Republicans. Democrats are the party of Dick Cheney now. Democrats give speeches "that could be given by Ronald Reagan or George Bush". Democrats are pro-CIA, pro-war, pro censorship, pro-corporate Republicans now. That's the way it is. Not my problem if you haven't realized it yet.

      Delete
    30. Once Reagan turned the Republicans into Confederates, Democrats rushed-in to fill the vacuum.

      Delete
    31. Hector, I’ll take it for granted, as liberals take it, that the CIA is gold-plated during a Democratic presidency, but suspect under a Republican one. Unless, of course, that Republican is Trump.

      I don’t know where the disconnect is that Russia might have preferred Trump because Trump’s rhetoric was openly cautious as to Ukraine becoming a part of NATO and Trump has opined that he thinks Ukraine should stay neutral.

      Delete
    32. @Anon 10:24

      "What kind of insecure fag posts under multiple nyms?"

      What kind of spineless, cowardly weirdo anonymously posts homophobic slurs without any nym at all?

      And for the record: Wrong! I am not Hector. Hector is not me.

      Now, shoo!

      Delete
    33. Trump has opined that he thinks Ukraine should stay neutral.

      And what better way to keep Ukraine neutral than to launch a fucking barbaric invasion. Cecelia, you really are one dumb sonofabitch..

      You and Dickhead in Cal should tune in tonight - Rachel Maddow has a new documentry,

      From Russia with Lev

      From Executive Producer Rachel Maddow, "From Russia With Lev" reveals the outrageous scheme that led to former President Donald Trump's first impeachment. It follows the much, much larger-than-life journey of Lev Parnas, a Ukrainian-born hustler and former small-time mafia operator whose random, almost accidental association with Trump and Trump attorney Rudolph Giuliani took him around the world, and ultimately to prison. Lev reveals the ham-handed workings of the furtive campaign to dredge up false but damaging allegations against then-candidate Joe Biden. Tune in to the broadcast premiere of “From Russia With Lev” on Friday, Sept. 20 at 9 p.m. ET on MSNBC.

      Delete
  3. Raymond Shaw was forcibly brainwashed by an evil regime. Who are vance’s brainwashers and puppeteers? Peter Thiel? But Vance and Thiel seem to have a certain fondness for one another. There seems to be, one could say, a mutual interest.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed, Vance does not wear eyeliner just for any old couch.

      Delete
  4. These are interesting stats considering the D-List comedians (lost boys and girls- Bob’s heart bleeds…) AND the disingenuous argument that blogging on Gutfeld! Is a waste of time:

    Top Ten Prime Time Telecasts in Total Viewers: Gutfeld! (Fox News, 10:00 PM-11:00 PM, 60 min.) • 4.894 million viewers Survivor (P) (CBS, 8:00 PM-9:59 PM, 119 min.) • 4.721 million viewers Jesse Watters Primetime (Fox News, 8:00 PM-9:00 PM, 60 min.) • 3.279 million viewers Hannity (Fox News, 9:00 PM-10:00 PM, 60 min.) • 3.101 million viewers The Golden Bachelorette (P) (ABC, 8:00 PM-10:01 PM, 121 min.) • 2.814 million viewers Big Brother (Wed.) (CBS, 9:59 PM-11:00 PM, 61 min.) • 2.390 million viewers Chicago Med (R) (NBC, 8:00 PM-9:00 PM, 60 min.) • 2.362 million viewers Chicago Fire (R) (NBC, 9:00 PM-10:00 PM, 60 min.) • 2.272 million viewers Chicago PD (R) (NBC, 10:00 PM-11:00 PM, 60 min.) • 2.025 million viewers All In with Chris Hayes (MSNBC, 8:00 PM-9:00 PM, 60 min.) • 1.806 million viewers — Top Ten Prime Time Telecasts in Adults 18-49: Survivor (P) (CBS, 8:00 PM-9:59 PM, 119 min.) • 0.73/10 A18-49 rating/share (Range: 0.972-0.986 million adults 18-49; 0.78/10 F18-49, 0.69/10 M18-49) Big Brother (Wed.) (CBS, 9:59 PM-11:00 PM, 61 min.) • 0.46/7 A18-49 rating/share (Range: 0.610-0.623 million adults 18-49; 0.54/8 F18-49, 0.38/6 M18-49) Gutfeld! (Fox News, 10:00 PM-11:00 PM, 60 min.) • 0.34 A18-49 rating (Range: 0.449-0.462 million adults 18-49; 0.30 F18-49, 0.38 M18-49) The Golden Bachelorette (P) (ABC, 8:00 PM-10:01 PM, 121 min.) • 0.29/4 A18-49 rating/share (Range: 0.382-0.396 million adults 18-49; 0.39/5 F18-49, 0.20/3 M18-49) MasterChef (Fox, 8:00 PM-10:00 PM, 120 min.) • 0.26/4 A18-49 rating/share (Range: 0.342-0.355 million adults 18-49; 0.26/3 F18-49, 0.27/4 M18-49) AEW Dynamite (TBS, 8:00 PM-10:06 PM, 126 min.) • 0.22 A18-49 rating (Range: 0.288-0.302 million adults 18-49; 0.14 F18-49, 0.31 M18-49) Chicago Med (R) (NBC, 8:00 PM-9:00 PM, 60 min.) • 0.20/3 A18-49 rating/share (Range: 0.262-0.275 million adults 18-49; 0.27/4 F18-49, 0.13/2 M18-49) The Challenge Battle of the Eras (MTV, 8:00 PM-9:30 PM, 90 min.) • 0.20 A18-49 rating (Range: 0.261-0.275 million adults 18-49; 0.23 F18-49, 0.18 M18-49) Chicago PD (R) (NBC, 10:00 PM-11:00 PM, 60 min.) • 0.19/3 A18-49 rating/share (Range: 0.248-0.261 million adults 18-49; 0.18/3 F18-49, 0.21/3 M18-49) Chicago Fire (R) (NBC, 9:00 PM-10:00 PM, 60 min.) • 0.19/3 A18-49 rating/share (Range: 0.248-0.261 million adults 18-49; 0.25/3 F18-49, 0.14/2 M18-49)


    Read more: https://programminginsider.com/wednesday-ratings-cbs-leads-prime-time-and-more-than-doubles-the-runner-up-in-demos-with-survivor-47th-premiere-and-big-brother/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is shocking.

      Delete
    2. Trump was featured on Gutfeld!

      Delete
    3. The polls are tied but I have a feeling Democrats are in trouble.

      Delete
    4. Survivor got a big rating. Why not blog about that?

      Delete
    5. Cecelia,
      I stopped selling ad space in 1987, but thanks anyway.

      Delete
  5. Vance is a man after Somerby's own heart:

    "During an interview with Breitbart news in June 2021, Vance said he wanted to "destroy the universities," claiming 4 year college degrees make people "deranged" and "worse people." According to Pew Research Center, nearly 4 in 10 adults in the United States have a 4 year degree, that's about 125 million people.

    The Breitbart interviewer, while noting that JD Vance has a Yale law education himself, asked Vance what he thought about the state of education, associating it with "division in the country." Vance acknowledged that certain degrees and credentials are needed for opportunities that exist in society and even stated that he himself has benefitted from getting those credentials, but then attacked that system."

    And a man after Hitler's heart too, since the first thing he did after taking power was destroy the German university system, persecuting Jewish scholars in particular, many of whom fled to the US.

    Somerby doesn't like elites and is careful to mention which journalist went to which Ivy League school in which year, so that we know how they got to be so bad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now I understand Somerby’s antipathy towards Vance. It’s a Yale vs Harvard things.

      Delete
  6. Roger Ebert said:

    "Seen today, “The Manchurian Candidate” feels astonishingly contemporary; its astringent political satire still bites, and its story has uncanny contemporary echoes."

    Somerby seems to be taking the film a lot more literally than its makers intended. He seems to have lost the sense that it was satirical, treating it as historical.

    ReplyDelete
  7. When Somerby was discussing the emperor's new, he kept discussing the emperor's new clothes, but in the actual story the emperor is persuaded to appear in the nude, believing he is wearing magical cloth while in reality is naked. The point of the story is that no one will tell him that he is wearing nothing, except a small child who doesn't know any better than to participate in the emperor's delusion.

    Somerby refers to the press being deluded when the press has no power to enforce belief (while an emperor does). Meanwhile, it is Vance and Trump who are advancing delusional stories which the press may either repeat or debunk, while puts the press into the story as the child telling the truth, not the delusional emperor. So that metaphor makes no sense at all.

    Today, I have no clue who Somerby thinks is the Manchurian Candidate.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I wonder if Bob saw the remake with Denzel.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The Manchurian Candidate is very interesting film, fatally flawed by the casting of Frank Sinatra as a Cold War general. Love Sinatra's music, I'd nominate Songs for Swingin' Lovers as his best Big Band album, and Only the Lonely his best "saloon" album... but just couldn't get past "the Frank Sinatra character" in that movie.

    Useful of analysis of Vance by Bob in this post. He's a sadly damaged soul.

    ReplyDelete