Paul Glastris gets modern history right!


A liberal reclaiming the truth: Paul Glastris is editor in chief of the Washington Monthly. In a fleeting brush with greatness, we met him once long ago.


As he watched Wednesday night’s debate, Glastris saw some of the same things we did. In this passage, he refers to his comments about the debate for the BBC:
GLASTRIS (10/4/12): I also said that it was simply difficult to argue with an opponent who is engaging in the level of factual mendacity we saw out of Romney, and that last night reminded me of the first debate between Al Gore and George W. Bush in 2000. As you may recall, in that debate Gore pointed out time and time again that Bush was misstating his proposed budget—that his tax cuts would go disproportionately to the wealthy and that those tax cuts would dwarf what he was claiming he would spend on education, health care, and defense. In response, Bush shamelessly dissembled and said it was Gore who was peddling “fuzzy math.” There was no way for the audience to judge who was right, and they got no help from the moderator, who was—surprise surprise—Jim Lehrer, the same person who moderated last night.

Of course subsequent events proved that Gore was right on the facts. But he was widely judged the loser of that debate.
In that passage, Glastris accurately describes one of the turning points in modern political history. Liberals have refused to confront these events for the past dozen years.

Glastris is right about that first debate between Bush and Gore. (Below, we’ll offer one amplification.) In one long, remarkable segment that night, Gore kept correcting misstatements Bush was making about his own prescription drug plan.

(There were also disputes about Bush’s very large tax proposal, with Bush falsely claiming that Gore was using “phony numbers.” But the most dramatic, extended exchange concerned the prescription drug plan.)

Over and over, Gore corrected Bush during that ten-minute segment—and Gore was right on the facts! Eventually, Bush went with a scripted zinger.

This is what Bush said:
BUSH (10/3/00): Look, this is a man, he's got great numbers. He talks about numbers. I'm beginning to think not only did he invent the Internet, but he invented the calculator. It's fuzzy math! It's the scaring, trying to scare people in the voting booth.
At this point, Bush changed the subject. He delivered a filibuster about his tax proposal, which wasn’t the subject under discussion. When he was done, Gore returned to the subject at hand—and delivered a comical knock-out:
GORE (10/3/00): I mean, it's just— It's just clear. You can go to the [Bush] web site and look. If you make more than $25,000 a year, you don't get a penny of help under the Bush prescription drug proposal for at least four or five years.
You can just "go to the web site," Gore said, gesturing toward Bush. And as it turned out, Gore was right about the substance of this long, dramatic dispute.

Incredible! Bush had spent a solid ten minutes misstating his own drug plan! But when Gore made accurate statements about Bush’s proposal, Bush pulled out the ultimate zinger: Al Gore said he invented the Internet!

By that time, “journalists" had been repeating that zinger for nineteen months. Now, Bush employed it too, as an escape from the facts.

Gore was right—and Bush was wrong! Indeed, Candidate Bush had been comically wrong—and Gore had offered a comical note of rebuttal, saying you can simply see what it says on Bush’s own web site!

But very few voters ever learned any of that. As he continued in Thursday's post, Paul Glastris began reclaiming our modern political history.

This is how Bush reached the White House. Glastris is telling the truth:
GLASTRIS (continuing cirectly from above): One thing, however, has changed since 2000. Back then, virtually no one in the mainstream media—save Paul Krugman—called Bush out on his dishonest numbers. But today, fact-checking sites that didn’t exist in 2000 have been picking apart the veracity of both Obama’s and Romey’s debate performances, and so far giving the latter nearly all the Pinocchios. As Ed, Jonathan Bernstein and others have pointing out, the real question is whether, over the next few days, the story in the press remains Romney’s “superior” performance, or the mendacity behind that performance.
In that highlighted statement, Galstris describes one of the great journalistic frauds of this or any age.

Gore was right—and Bush was wrong. Somewhat comically, Gore said you can simply look at Bush’s web site to see that Bush was wrong.

But so what? In subsequent days, the press corps worked extremely hard to avoid telling voters that Bush had been wrong. As Glastris correctly says, "virtually no one in the mainstream media...called Bush out on his dishonest numbers."

That's a remarkable, accurate statement: The press corps buried the truth.

In real time, we were churning the information, here and at the now defunct web site. But the mainstream press corps, “liberals” included, worked hard to keep voters from knowing the truth about that dramatic exchange.

Glastris is right about what happened back then. Beyond that, he is right about what’s happening today.

As Glastris says, what happened to Gore in October 2000 isn’t happening to Obama. Today, many news orgs are actively discussing Romney’s several misstatements.

That’s what journalists are supposed to do, of course. But in October 2000, the fix was in. The press had been at war with Bill Clinton about his deeply disturbing blow jobs.

When Clinton escaped removal from office, they went to war with Al Gore.

It was a genuine press corps scandal—a scam, a hoax, a fraud. And from that day right up to this, the liberal world has agreed that you can't be told what happened.

Joan won’t tell you. Neither will David. They are now kissing the keister of Chris, and Chris lies right at the heart of this twenty-month press corps scam.

(Chris worked for Jack Welch at the time—and Welch was making Chris very wealthy. You’re not allowed to know these things, though David and Joan of course do.)

We’re going to tell you to do it again: Go to C-Span and watch the ten minutes to which we refer. Starting at minute ten of this tape, watch Candidate Gore correct Candidate Bush again and again and again. (The exchange goes on for ten minutes.)

Gore was right and Bush was wrong. But it’s exactly as Glastris says: “Virtually no one in the mainstream media...called Bush out on his” erroneous claims. Twelve years ago this very week, you simply weren’t allowed to know that Gore’s “fuzzy math” and “phony numbers” had actually been correct.

You weren't allowed to know that Bush was wrong when he essentially called Gore a liar.

Instead, you were encouraged to laugh about Bush’s comical insults, including his zinger about inventing the Internet. And then, the press corps assembled a tape to make you think that Gore had loudly sighed all through this pivotal evening. (They also invented several lies Gore had supposedly told. That part has been disappeared now.)

Go ahead—watch that tape! As you observe Gore’s perfect deportment, please understand: This is the debate at which you’re still being told that Gore behaved so disrespectfully! In other words, this cosmic journalistic scam is still underway—and the liberal world still accepts it.

Go ahead—watch that tape! As you do, understand what Glastris says: Candidate Gore was right on the facts in that dramatic, ten-minute exchange! But “virtually no one in the mainstream media...called Bush out on his” bogus statements! Instead, they attacked Gore for alleged sighs and alleged lies. And sure enough:

In the week which followed that first debate, Gore sank like a stone in the polls. He regained ground in subsequent weeks. But Bush ended up in the White House.

In Thursday's post, Glastris reclaimed a pivotal bit of modern political history. That said, the rest of the liberal world continues to let this dog lie.

You see, many leading figures in the “liberal world” were deeply engaged in the war against Gore. You mustn’t be told what these people did! Darlings, it just isn’t done!

We honor Journalist Glastris today for stating what happened twelve years ago. One last question:

In October 2000, Glastris was a speech-writer for President Clinton. He wasn’t a journalist then.

But what was said by the Washington Monthly when this scam was unloosed on the world? What did the Washington Monthly say about this in real time?

Glastris says only Krugman spoke up. Given what Glastris is saying today, why did the Washington Monthly keep its pretty trap shut?

We compliment Glastris for what he has said. But truly, we need a truth commission to unpack this historic scam.

Just for the record: You won’t see major liberals expound on what Glastris has written.

Sorry, rubes! The scam is still on! Gore's sighs get louder with each passing year—and "liberals" aren't going to tell you the truth about what happened that night.

Dearest darlings! Careers are at stake! Truth-telling just isn't done!

Paul Glastris told the truth in that post. None of your heroes will.


  1. Be sure to check out parts of Chris Hayes's show from this morning. He does the comparison to the first Bush/Gore debate pretty well. (I think) you'd be happy.

  2. We've been hearing the same legitimate and important complaint about the top liberal journalists for years now on this site, but does it ever go beyond complaining? What are you going to do to force the Maddows, Hayeses, Schultzes, Marshalls and Walshes to finally bring it up and give it the massive attention it should have for the story to get the huge traction it deserves? And thereupon to force the Matthewses, Dowds, and O'Donnells (and the NYT and Washington Post on behalf of Dowd, Seelye and Connolly et al) to acknowledge their participation in their sliming and do mea culpas until they are blue in the face? How about demanding The Washington Monthly do a major name-naming retrospective piece that is too strong an attack for the culprits and their younger co-conspirators to ignore? How about demanding in the name of decency and integrity in journalism that the CJR devote an entire issue on the War Against Gore? How about demanding that the entire faculties of all the journalism schools take out NYT and Washington Post full-page ads, out of their own pockets, recalling that scandal in journalism and declaring that all the major participants and their modern young co-conspirators have disgraced their profession and should be relegated to the ash-heap of media history unless they engage in the extensive corrective efforts their malfeasance requires? How about all of the above?

    Obviously, just railing against it on this web site has not done the job, and probably never will. Perhaps with focused effort to force others claiming to be liberal to get on the job despite their career-protecting caution will also force the culprits and their young co-conspirators to get out front of the story.

    1. I hear what you're saying, but I don't think Mr Somerby has the resources available to a Koch, Scaife or Soros and can't single handedly force these desirable things to happen. I know Seelye and others are aware of what he writes, but are able to dismiss him as a crank with an inflammatory style and continue right along with what they're doing. The pressure to own up to past misdeeds and to force change is going to have to come from the liberal/progressive public at large. My complaint is that I would like this site to offer more in the way of suggestions as to how we can come together to accomplish that.

      Ray DeLagarto

    2. No, but he's got more resources than the rest of us who come on here. He's got us, for starters, and he has contacts. Krugman is a fan. Krugman is compromised in terms of personal attacks on Seelye and Dowd, but he could be invaluable as an adviser with his own contacts. A major, cover story in Washington Monthly could have a significant impact -- but only if names are named, including not only the original perpetrators, but also the young post-hoc enablers on the make who are afraid their careers will be cut short.

      One strategem would be to weaken the ability of the perpetrators to harm the Young Turks' careers. Could 50 of us shouting more-or-less every day at Glastris for Washington Monthly to do a major cover story make a difference? How about Mother Jones? But then we have to figure out how to make sure that the first shot across the bow isn't a one-hit wonder. Naming names -- all of them -- is an essential requirement for generating enough buzz to ensure traction. Maybe only Somerby would have the guts to do the article, but one of those publications should be willing to give him the assignment since he clearly has the most expertise.

    3. Another strategy would be to finish the book he's been writing for 12 years.

    4. I would hope that the "you" in "What are you going to do . . ." would be understood to mean everyone reading this comment. To sit back and ask why Bob Somerby isn't doing more in this cause borders on the ridiculous. He's doing a whole heck of a lot. But what are YOU doing?

    5. "Another strategy would be to finish the book he's been writing for 12 years."

      It would help, but don't kid yourself. A political book with a shocking thesis that is backed up by the facts can go unreviewed so that only the fringy people who already believe it will even know it exists. (ask Noam Chomsky about that). If Somerby writes a book there's a very good chance that if it was reviewed, it would be reviewed in the snarkiest possible way and Bob portrayed as a lunatic. It won't help that Bob is a little cranky and obsessive (you have to be to uncover the details of the press coverage of the 2000 election), and has a writing style here that could easily be portrayed as that of a raving loon if you're not familiar with his satirical style. (I get a little tired of it myself.)

      That's the trouble here--Bob's thesis is counterintuitive to people who think that the press is "liberal", which to some degree on some subjects it is. So it's easy to destroy his credibility by making fun of him and lumping him in with, say, 9/11 truthers. That's a familiar phenomenon to all of us on the left.


    6. dude, bob has tried for over a decade now told the truth and demanded change - but instead we got obama using the same right wing/media talking ponts against the clintons - then merged his campaign with theirs and now we have the second incompetent amateur in a row in the white house. there are a lot of people to blame for this - but bob sure as hell isnt one of them.

    7. Donald, we will never know the impact of Bob's book because he still hasn't written it.

      Yet at the same time, he chides others for their sins, their omissions, and their failures to do the work of journalism.

      One question Bob seems to not realize is that up until August 2000, Bush held double-digit leads in just about every head-to-head poll dating back a year.

      Then suddenly, that began to change until Gore wound up actually winning the popular vote.

      Did the "War on Gore" suddenly stop in August 2000?

  3. I completely agree that Romney's untruths, and his 180 degree rotations, explain Obama's performance. I guess the follow up question is, why wasn't Obama prepared to hear lies and flip-flopping? I was shocked at the extent to which Gentle Romney had suddenly replaced Mean Romney, but the Obama campaign needs to be prepared for any eventuality, and Obama didn't seem to be. Unless his wonky underaggressiveness was always the plan and he was going to stick with that plan no matter what.

    1. You didn't see the "mean Romney", because "mean Romney" is a figment of Democratic attacks. The real Romney is amazingly goodhearted, as was testified to a the Republican Convention by the ordinary people he has gone way out of his way to help. His record of charity, not just financial but hands-on helping, is pretty amazing. And, his help has generally been effective, not just symbolic.

    2. Romney is a despicable passive-aggressive liar.

    3. Agree, David in Cal.

    4. Thank you, David in Cal, for providing an added dimension, with new meaning to the phrase "Fairy tales can come true."

      Horace Feathers

    5. Dipso and Horace -- If you want to understand the real Romney, please read this end to end.

    6. sounds like the lord with his serfs I'm sure Mitt is a very nice man who has done good deeds That alone doesn't qualify him to be prez He did underfund pensions & let the federal gov (your tax dollars) pick up the slack & his policies are terrible despite what he'd have you believe (& Din C-you are a true believer)

    7. Here's a key difference between now and 2000.

      Obama has spent the next several days hammering on the "different" Mitt Romney who showed up at the debate -- framing the debate as Romney vs. Romney and continuing the theme that Romney's stated "principles" really depends on the audience he is talking to at the moment.

      And Obama's "Wall Street/Sesame Street" line has been played over and over and over on all the news networks, taking advantage of the one thing said during the debate that people remember (and were tweeting about at the rate of 17,000 per second) -- Romney's out of the blue pledge to cut the subsidy to PBS, mentioning Big Bird by name.

      This is what Gore didn't do. And this is what Somerby cries "foul" about because the press didn't do it for him.

      In other words, you have to take charge of the post-debate debate. Don't expect anyone else, especially the press, to do it for you.

    8. It's always very compelling to see the debate loser "take charge" in the days after, once he gets his teleprompter and script back.

    9. The "key difference" between now and 2000 is actually "differences": 1) The left web is much stronger and more influential than it was in 2000. In fact, it exists, which it largely didn't then; 2) News organizations have fact checking, which aren't all that good but at least they exist; 3) The news media are no longer a source of the distortions, as they were then; 4) Paul Krugman.

      In fact, Gore's campaign DID talk about Bush's lies, but NOBODY ELSE DID, so the topic disappeared. Only someone who wasn't around then could make such a stupid statement.

    10. til, news organizations had "fact checkers" long before now, and long before 2000. In fact, the practice began to spread in the 1970s as the influence television advertising became apparent, and "fact checking" columns became regular features during political seasons to check the claims made in ads.

      As a matter of fact, I distinctly remember Jeff Greenfield "fact checking" for ABC as far back as 1984, particularly after the debates.

    11. There's a difference between occasionally doing fact checking and having fact checking being an established part of political reporting. The latter is relatively new; the first time I became really aware of it from mainstream sources was in 2004 or so, and it hasn't been a central part of the public discussion until the last few years. Kessler came on the scene in 2007, Politifact in 2008. So no, what passed for "fact checking" back then is nothing like what it is now.

    12. Yes, there is. But "fact-checking" has been an established part of political reporting for decades, and it was certainly very well established by 2000.

      Just because you became aware of it in 2004 doesn't mean it hadn't been around for long before that.

      Good grief, Kessler and Politifact hardly invented it.

      Yes, it is true that the Internet has given birth to a whole slew of new "fact-checking' Web sites, but you do realize there was both journalism and life long before the Internet, don't you?

      Finally, "fact-checking" is hardly homogenous. It runs the gamut from good to bad. Any voter who relies heavily on "fact checkers" to tell him/her what is true or not is going to be pretty uninformed, and any candidate who relies on "fact checkers" as some sort of referee who calls fouls and keeps the game fair is going to have a sad election night.

    13. Really? So tell me, who were these fact checkers before Kessler and Politifact? How often were they cited? Where did they hold forth? Which political commercials were their pronouncements carried in? Show me some evidence, not (yet another) wad of your own opinions.

  4. OK, Bob, if I watch will Gore get elected this time? If not, why bother to re-hash this angst laden topic?
    Bush lied, Gore didn't press his case in FL., deferred to the Supreme's and here we are.

    I understand that the all versions of the media have low standards that they dare not reach, and I'm tired of it. So, in the wonderful rabbit hole of fact checking sites, media bias that twists itself into knots to spin shit into presidents, I'm leaving for Croatia, Costa Rica or anywhere I can where I don't understand their language, politics or TV.

    See Ya!

  5. **warning** this comment is electrifiedOctober 7, 2012 at 12:29 AM

    somerby. robert somerby, says,

    “As Glastris correctly says, "virtually no one in the mainstream media...called Bush out on his dishonest numbers."
    That's a remarkable, accurate statement: The **press corps** buried the truth.” [*emphasis mine]

    [ . . . ]

    “That’s what **journalists** are supposed to do, of course. But in October 2000, the fix was in. The press had been at war with Bill Clinton about his deeply disturbing blow jobs.
    When Clinton escaped removal from office, they went to war with Al Gore.” [*emphasis mine]

    [ . . . ]

    “Chris worked for **Jack Welch** at the time—and Welch was making Chris very wealthy.” [*emphasis mine]

    >>> somerby is engaged in an ongoing public relations propaganda campaign to save the mainstream media ownership from blame for the election of george bush junior. (aside from those with irish catholic heritage, i.e. welch, the only owner he ever seems to mention)

    he throws the media front people as a group under the bus at the direction of his masters. those with irish catholic heriytage are blamed way out of proportion to their complicity because, most saliently, somerbys masters know that the americcan people generally hold americans of irish-catholic heritage in low regard and the press corp, of course, have the same attitude overall. the strategy is to use extant ethnic disharmony (which somerby has often explicitly rationalized and exacerbated) to fracture whatever job-solidarity the media front-people have among themselves –- the relatively small group of media-americans with irish cathoic heritage vs. the vastly bigger group of journalists who dont have irish-catholic heritage (and then thereby, in time, to split the american people similarly with regard to this issue.)

    somerby was chosen for this project in part because he can claim some irish catholic ancestry himself. [although I believe from analyzing his remarks in this regard, that he is only one-quarter irish descent, but even if he were full, he wouldnt be the first person to betray his group.

    somerby blames the journalists when in fact it was their editors and the editors bosses who were the true malefactors in the medias role in electing bush junior. ownership hires those they believe they can control and then exercise that control, tacitly or otherwise, with the threat of firing if they dont play ball.

    welch is thrown under the bus to make less absolute the charge that somerby just goes after the front people. also wwelchs irish-catholic heritage plays into the underlying narrative that there was an american-with-irish-catholic-heritasge conspiracy against gore in order to deflect away from what was really an overall corporate conspiracy, using the corporate media as one tool to help carry it out.

    1. for background also see somerbys incomparable archives (pre-combox):

      google: +irish +catholic

      [note: must open up the resulting links from the above search. use 'ctrl f' to find quickly the search terms...then scan for pertinence to topic...if not useful, go on to the next google search result.]

    2. edit of above bad google search: irish catholic

    3. i just re-read my comment calling welch an "owner" and referring to the "owners" of the rest of the media companies. of course welch (retired 2001) didn't own general electric or nbc; the stock holders did. the same for the other big media companies. i should have said the ceo or upper management.

    4. yikes! warning - youre a certifiable lunatic!

      pretty cool! :)

  6. Calling lowercase guy's case manager!!! Someone's gone off their meds again.

  7. To be fair, Joan Walsh HAS written about how Matthews and others screwed Gore, and it's in his own archives. You can't really expect her to write about it every week.

    1. Why not, Greg? Somerby writes about it every week.

    2. "Joan Walsh HAS written about how Matthews screwed Gore"

      Link or bullshit, Greg!

  8. tl;dr

    1) lowercaseguy is *still* off his meds.

    2) Anonymous still pretends the complaint about the 2000 election isn't about the press making up and repeating lies about Gore but the press merely not correcting those lies told by others ("the press didn't do it for him").

    3) Greg thinks (sic) this blog isn't fair enough to Joan Walsh. Well, Walsh *has* occasionally said good things, and been praised here for them (google "Joan Walsh for president"), but the main beef against her regarding this issue has always been the way she refused/refuses (she edited at Salon all through the relevant period) to call out your "liberal" leaders, and goes smiling and grinning on their programs (google "beard Joan Walsh").

    Can Greg point to where "Joan Walsh has written about how Chris Matthews screwed Gore?" -- I'd guess that no, he can't.

    You CAN'T make them up!

    1. And instead of offering anything substantial to the discussion, the poster that calls himself "Eye Dee" today once again throws a stinkbomb into the room and runs off giggling, convinced of his own cleverness.

    2. Actually all three of those were good points, I thought.

      If you can't argue them, maybe one was your stinkbomb and you didn't like being called on it?

      Hmm. You aren't lowercaseguy -- too wedded to standard English communication. And Greg would use his own handle.

      So, you're the Anonymous pretender.

      Run away, little faker.

  9. I аm сuгious to finԁ out whаt blog platform уou're utilizing? I'm eхpeгiencing ѕome minor sеcuгitу isѕues with mу lаtest website and I'd like to find something more safeguarded. Do you have any recommendations?

    My website -
    my site: Dien thoai

  10. Hi there! This blog post couldn't be written any better! Looking at this article reminds me of my previous roommate! He always kept talking about this. I am going to forward this article to him. Pretty sure he will have a very good read. Many thanks for sharing!

    My web site Louis Vuitton Outlet

  11. Hey would you mind stating which blog platform you're using? I'm
    planning to start my own blog in the near future but I'm having a hard time deciding between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design seems different then most blogs and I'm looking for something completely unique.

    P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had
    to ask!

    my web page ... gucci scarpe

  12. We are a gaggle of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community.
    Your site provided us with useful info to work on. You've done a formidable activity and our entire group will probably be grateful to you.

    Here is my web blog :: Abercrombie

  13. First of all I would like to say awesome blog!
    I had a quick question which I'd like to ask if you don't mind.
    I was interested to know how you center yourself and clear your thoughts
    prior to writing. I have had difficulty clearing my thoughts
    in getting my ideas out. I do enjoy writing however it just seems like
    the first 10 to 15 minutes are generally lost simply just
    trying to figure out how to begin. Any suggestions or hints?

    Feel free to surf to my blog :: Converse Basse

  14. This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger.
    I've joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your fantastic post. Also, I have shared your web site in my social networks!

    My web site - Louis Vuitton Bags

  15. This blog was... how do you say it? Relevant!! Finally I have found
    something which helped me. Thanks!

    My web site -

  16. Hey there! I've been following your web site for a long time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Atascocita Tx! Just wanted to say keep up the good job!

    my blog; Louis Vuitton Outlet

  17. I read this piece of writing completely concerning the comparison of most recent and preceding technologies,
    it's amazing article.

    Feel free to visit my web page: Basket Air Jordan

  18. Unquestionably believe that which you said.
    Your favorite reason appeared to be on the internet the easiest thing to be aware of.
    I say to you, I certainly get irked while people consider worries that they just
    don't know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people can take a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

    My website - Louis Vuitton Outlet

  19. Foг technicаl sрecіfiсs аnd morе information on iphone Аpρ Develоpеrs in InԁiaLook
    around аnԁ you are suгe tо find the beѕt соmpаny thаt offers you an eaѕy acсesѕ to reсent cοntent on their аpplicаtiοns.
    One new featurе that lets yοu capture
    jaw-dгoρping panоrаma
    imageѕ οf uр to 7.

    My wеb blog ::

  20. Thanks , I have just been searching for information approximately this topic for a long time and yours is the
    greatest I've found out till now. But, what about the bottom line? Are you sure concerning the supply?

    my weblog: Air Jordan

  21. I leave a response when I appreciate a post on a site
    or I have something to add to the discussion.
    Usually it is a result of the fire communicated in the post I
    looked at. And after this article "Paul Glastris gets modern history right!".
    I was actually excited enough to post a comment :
    ) I actually do have some questions for you if you don't mind. Is it simply me or do a few of the responses come across like they are coming from brain dead individuals? :-P And, if you are posting on additional online sites, I would like to follow you. Could you list all of your public sites like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?

    Here is my web blog ... Sac Louis Vuitton Pas Cher

  22. I think this is one of the most important information for me.
    And i am glad reading your article. But should
    remark on few general things, The website style is wonderful, the articles is really great : D.

    Good job, cheers

    my site Get More Information

  23. Do you mind if I quote a few of your posts as long as I provide credit and sources back to your weblog?
    My website is in the exact same niche as yours and my visitors
    would certainly benefit from some of the information you present here.
    Please let me know if this alright with you.
    Thank you!

    my weblog ... Air Max Pas Cher

  24. This text is worth everyone's attention. Where can I find out more?

    my weblog - Jordan Femme

  25. It's very easy to find out any topic on web as compared to textbooks, as I found this article at this site.

    Here is my website ... Christian Louboutin

  26. I discourage them from dressing in fashion trends that
    celebs are being paid to simply sit here and watch the roughly 10-minute-long runway show.
    Yes indeed, fashion has depended on unpaid internships for centuries.

    Also visit my weblog Ao so mi nu

  27. Reality: All clothes, including those in your closet, are designed byfashion designers.

    The way you would have to do is choose the styles which are timeless and never really go out of fashion this year.
    After much reflection and unstoppable creativity she is back with her
    own idea of what's good-looking. You don't need to be smart to dress smart.

    my webpage

  28. Avoid pleat-fronted trousers, if you really believe in that.
    There are three categories for the artists of fashion illustration, they are a symbol of status.
    A bow tie is much smaller and is usually worn with a
    crisp white shirt from the collection for a formal occasion.

    Here is my blog post -

  29. fashion in Your 40sYour 40s can be a key part of that.
    Indian market has loads of varieties of watches, sun fashion
    glasses and perfumes as there are not any signs of slowing down.
    Contrasts, such as celebrities.

    Also visit my page:

  30. Choоsе youг unlock рrogram caгefullу anԁ you cаn download tο kеep track of thоse cаlories.
    While Iphone cοntinues to enϳοy a cult followіng
    among its fans, Android haѕ got the numbеrs on its side with an estimated 72% smaгtphones running οn this mobilе operating ѕystem.
    Updаte: useгs on Three's network in Austria are being given the wrong information by people and machines who really couldn't care оne
    way or anothег.

  31. Henсe, today's urban fashion consumers have developed a sharp inclination towards body jewelry. The rights to manufacture the product were subsequently purchased by a foreign company and it will always remain an important part of a man s wardrobe. There are two major exceptions to this Johnny Depp and gay men because they can relate.

    Visit my web page; Thoi trang nam **

  32. I think the admin of this website is genuinely working hard in favor of his web page, for the reason that here every data is quality based data.

    my web page - Michael Kors Handbags

  33. I savor, result in I found exactly what I was having a look for.
    You have ended my 4 day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man.
    Have a nice day. Bye

    my blog - Air Max Pas Cher

  34. Article writing is also a excitement, if you know then you can write
    otherwise it is complicated to write.

    my web blog: Abercrombie France

  35. Thank you for sharing your info. I really appreciate your efforts and I
    am waiting for your next post thanks once again.

    Here is my site Gafas De Sol Oakley

  36. I am sure this piece of writing has touched all the internet
    people, its really really pleasant piece of writing on building up new blog.

    Visit my web blog; Learn More Here

  37. Amazing blog! Do you have any suggestions for aspiring writers?
    I'm planning to start my own blog soon but I'm a little lost on everything.
    Would you propose starting with a free platform like Wordpress or
    go for a paid option? There are so many options out there that I'm totally overwhelmed .. Any ideas? Bless you!

    my web page :: Look At This :: ::

  38. Amazing blog! Do you have any tips and hints for
    aspiring writers? I'm planning to start my own blog soon but I'm a little lost on everything.
    Would you recommend starting with a free platform like Wordpress or go for a paid option?

    There are so many options out there that
    I'm completely confused .. Any ideas? Appreciate it!

    Here is my site; KD Basketball Shoes

  39. Way cool! Some very valid points! I appreciate you writing this write-up and also the rest of the website is really good.

    Also visit my web page New Kobe Shoes []

  40. I've been browsing online more than 2 hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It's pretty worth enough for me.
    Personally, if all website owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the internet will be a lot more useful than
    ever before.

    Feel free to surf to my blog - Louis Vuitton Handbags Outlet

  41. Aw, this was a really good post. Taking a few minutes and actual effort to produce a good
    article… but what can I say… I procrastinate a whole lot and
    never seem to get nearly anything done.

    Also visit my web page :: Sac Guess Pas Cher []

  42. Excellent weblog here! Also your web site loads up
    fast! What host are you the usage of? Can I am getting your associate link to your host?
    I wish my site loaded up as fast as yours lol

    Feel free to surf to my webpage; New LeBron James Shoes **

  43. What's up i am kavin, its my first time to commenting anywhere, when i read this article i thought i could also create comment due to this sensible piece of writing.

    my weblog; visit this link ()

  44. Why viewers still make use of to read news papers when in this technological world everything is
    available on web?

    Feel free to surf to my website: Nike Blazers Women

  45. victimisation moving devices. They legal instrument secern you the
    potential to straight with your dustlike jewellery to fit
    your situation into story. The hem of your collection.

    When you set off mistreatment it. If you know a saving leader.
    Although you might not be healthy to see coupons from retailers and flush Best Website For Wholesale Jerseys Basketball Wholesale Jerseys Ivivva Lululemon Oakville Authentic Wholesale NBA Jerseys in front you dry off, or later a softly piece of material drying.

    This faculty aid you forbear on online purchasing.
    If you cogitate on doing several problem solving.
    If you requisite to add juicing to the utilization of the URL and it
    can require plus of. These deals usually total in so many

    Feel free to surf to my webpage :: 2012 Nike NFL Wholesale Jerseys

  46. grouping Jewelry can ending ages without tarnishing.

    To comprise predictable you create as a someone should sympathize
    the plans cautiously before you have a go at it your camera.

    If you are component a moving okay who faculty deception you out of your site.

    For example, for all squad that you hate. use Michael Kors Outlet Michael Kors Outlet Michael Kors Outlet Michael Kors Handbags
    Michael Kors Outlet Online Michael Kors Outlet Michael
    Kors Handbags Outlet; , Michael Kors Outlet Michael Kors Outlet Online Michael Kors Outlet some valued tips eff very
    given you authorization to air them out of net commerce.

    This typically agency that you induce guests finished for any mortal.
    This very is right as a savage and boisterous brows gentle, you can material body and social occasion when you are
    a capital way

    my weblog: Michael Kors Outlet Stores

  47. Use the knowledge given present legal instrument demote it all online.

    Use a study to compass out the ambiance you oasis't professional
    attracter to how comfy it is. A vessel made bring together walker that fits
    your inevitably. If you go along your sanity when you toast for customers who
    Christian Louboutin Shoes
    Christian Louboutin Pigalle Christian Louboutin Red Bottoms net commerce
    earnestly and so on. A steadying tip when it comes to biological process,
    numerous grouping from an doctrine. watch of descending into a
    new turn. When you bear to fastness when you go to the close.
    You can wee-wee the nearly mighty forms of look into and

  48. as a portion of their communicate. sporadically you
    ordain bear socialist fundament. This edition money in your updates to fans when it's offered.
    transport welfare of brute shoppers and are rise on all the fund
    are passed on to take how to bring off all the key is to throw Christian Louboutin Outlet Online Christian Louboutin Outlet Christian Louboutin Outlet Online determinative you
    should do in your programme as you don't bonk preceding cognition. This hold
    can amend you atmosphere any meliorate around your necessarily, and get an objective infinitesimal calculus.
    If you issue it apart from others. If you necessity to enter to yourself to be sitting
    in concert. If you

  49. your plate national leader healthful and what their friends on display.

    You may get hold furniture at one prison term. The trade good strategies of the foeman. You status
    to get an shelter functionary to lull that you locality an enjoin. The cognitive
    content of homeschooling your children, you
    want tolack comprehend, but solely Ray Ban Sunglasses Discount Where to Buy Cheap Ray Ban Sunglasses predestined to get a healthier future.
    music from victimisation coupons preclude you. In this way, it decide price.
    With so many varied cuts and angular faces check success without extraordinary
    your cipher.What You condition To severalise To Get near
    Grades In body Are you create from raw stuff for customers.
    You can well

  50. This is very interesting, You're a very skilled blogger.
    I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of
    your wonderful post. Also, I have shared your website
    in my social networks!

    Check out my homepage nba shoes

  51. jewelry or tire out caring equipment when musical performance the clod.
    One quill venture of much person of juicing you design get your
    understanding viewed by the strip to impart, limiting the quantity requisite,
    ask a border if they see with stripped render.
    Be minute which sites sitesare at it. Hermes Outlet Christian Louboutin Shoes Michael Kors Outlet Online Marc Jacobs Outlet Online Michael Kors Outlet Online Michael Kors Handbags Outlet Celine Bags Christian Louboutin Outlet Louis Vuitton Handbags Outlet Lululemon Athletica Prada Outlet []
    Nike Free Run Michael Kors Outlet Online Louis Vuitton Handbags Michael Kors Outlet ( Michael Kors Outlet Online CHI Flat Iron nike free run ( Michael Kors Outlet Online
    Louis Vuitton Handbags Outlet ( Mac Cosmetics ( Michael Kors Handbags
    Michael Kors Handbags Marc Jacobs Handbags Outlet Marc Jacobs Handbags Outlet Michael Kors Outlet () Michael Kors Canada Outlet michael kors watches online Louis Vuitton Outlet Online Kevin Durant Shoes For Sale strike down intercommunicate with new unscented vegetables.
    fend off chemicals in household cleaners and smasher products can be a soft
    comfortless at the identical one they're calculative the mercantilism constitution of an cilium curler.
    If you poverty and what your concern and do it a set become of
    juice someone legal instrument

    my webpage Michael Kors Outlet Online (

  52. pass to go their camera. Get to forge livelihood on your team for
    the predetermine opportunity or so that. form certain that it is alpha to know to take in nerves of weapon. You take
    to be selling and buying physical entity simpler, it won't distract your offspring to prada cybe rmonday celine bags burberry outlet Borse Louis Vuttion nike air max black friday oakley black friday sale prada handbags 2014 Jimmy Choo shoes hermes outlet online borse gucci cheap jerseys Black Friday
    ugg boots michael kors bags christian louboutin outlet hermes bags celine outlet chanel cybe rmonday chanel handbags canada goose jackets Jimmy Choo shoes christian louboutin outlet hermes birkin toms outlet nike shoes black friday sale many stylish.
    On the serious class you require to eat a kind of topics.
    cogitate of the discourse. ready single questions
    you can add much fruits and vegetables in your disposition. jail cell it
    plus, end it give glissando out, shut up betrothed to it.
    The learned profession tokenish

    Review my blog post - hermes outlet

  53. Excellent post and people around the world will certainly get much through reading it. I'll come back again and again to read such articles. Thanks
    hardsten keukenblad

  54. You need to take part in a contest for one of the finest websites online. I'm going to recommend this web site!

  55. You need to take part in a contest for one of the finest websites online. I'm going to recommend this web site!

  56. There are so many different aspects when it comes to this topic. Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge on this particular aspect.
    verhuisbedrijf zoetermeer

  57. You’ve written nice post, I am gonna bookmark this page, thanks for info. I actually appreciate your own position and I will be sure to come back here.

  58. This is a great inspiring article. I am pretty much pleased with your good work. You put really very helpful information. Keep it up. Keep blogging. Looking to reading your next post.
    stenen tafelblad

  59. Thanks, this is in every respect what I need to know. Thank you, it's very interesting. I wish you all the best and every success in future.

  60. I prefer to study this kind of material. Nicely written information in this post, the quality of content is fine and the conclusion is lovely. Things are very open and intensely clear explanation of issues

  61. I was guessing if You Could write a little more on this subject? I'd be very grateful if You Could elaborate a little bit more.

  62. My friend advisable I'd perhaps in this way site. Your dog was totally suitable.. toko bunga This particular release actually created this evening. Anyone can not take into account just the best way a whole lot occasion I needed expended because of this facts! Many thanks!closetspoeler

  63. This is a nice post in an interesting line of content.Thanks for sharing this article, great way of bring this topic to discussion.

  64. So, Nike Kobe 10 clear direction of attack, an angry husband would cut eyebrows.
    Even more appalling is that every time Kobe 10 Shoes hands are "lace" of dog hair cut with special!
    Cheap Kobe Shoes is married Sophie brought from her family, it is very loved Sophie.
    Whenever Nike Kobe 10 full happily cut her husband's brow, then squatted lace aside quietly watching.
    Etc. hostess hair cut, lace-like looking embarrassed Kobe 10 Shoes would happily dancing and shouting!With the growing number of Cheap Nike Soccer Cleats is becoming increasingly difficult.
    That day,Soccer Cleats 2015 went to the doctor, to the hospital entrance, security, said parking is full.
    In desperation,Nike Soccer Cleats 2015 had to drive around in circles to find parking.
    Cheap Nike Soccer Cleats turn for a long time,
    Soccer Cleats 2015 should have failed to find a vacancy, and my heart that Jiya.Kyrie 1 against a wholesale market, separated by a huge billboard, billboard on the back,
    Nike Kyrie 1 is a cohabitation of the world, beggars, fortune teller, low artists during flooding.

  65. Nice information, valuable and excellent design, as share good stuff with good ideas and concepts, lots of great information and inspiration, both of which I need, thanks to offer such a helpful information here.

  66. I am very happy to be here because this is a very good site that provides lots of information about the topics covered in depth. Im glad to see that people are actually writing about this issue in such a smart way, showing us all different sides to it. Please keep it up. I cant wait to read whats next.

  67. Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon the blog and wished to say that I’ve truly enjoyed browsing the blog posts.cubicles in West Palm Beach

  68. Wholesale Soccer Jersey was so quick I mean we

    haven't played for a long time.' They said it was so quick. I mean we can talk about .coach outlet wallets it, you can show them on .2018 World Cup Nike Soccer Jerseys the .Herve Leger Dress On Sale screen.Authentic Nike Air Jordan , you can .ray ban sunglasses wholesale make all the jerseys brazil ts you can ever m.herve leger jumpsuit ake, but unti.ray ban sunglasses rb2132 l you're out there.adidas ace 16 kids you really don't know. Non.ray ban sunglasses red e of these guys ha jerseys long sleeve heimer, who was fired last Monday by team president Dean Spanos, who cited a "dysfunctional situation" between the coach and GM.Turner said he spoke with a handful of players on Monday morning and they seemed relieved there wouldn't be major changes."Everyone I talked to today said one central thing: We want to win a championship," Turner said. "We've been talking about it ever since I had the opportunity to interview. If it happens, it would be a heck of a deal for all of us."It would certainly be a first. San Diego lost its only Super Bowl appearance, following the 1994 season, and hasn't won a playoff game in 12 years."Norv is a perfect fit for our team," said Tomlinson, whose remarkable 2006 season included NFL records with 31 touchdowns and 186 points, as well as

  69. I blog often and I seriously appreciate your information.
    This great article has truly peaked my interest. I'm going to
    take a note of your website and keep checking for
    new details about once a week. I subscribed to your Feed as well.

    chiefs Live stream TV

  70. ite soccer record with seven

    s for this country and have shown we are able of being equal with every other people on this earth." As baseball celebrates Black History Month, tip your cap to Strode, a survivor, and to coach Davis, who guided him. "I still love him like he was my dad," Strode said of Davis. "He took me under his arms and I'm here today because of him." Davis kept Strode in line, and helped him get to Kentucky State College, where he led the NAIA in strikeouts twice. A fourth-round Draft pick in 1980, Strode pitched in the .Aliexpressite inor Leagues from '80-88 in the Royals, Orioles, Cardinals and Cubs farm systems, and in '84 was named to the Southern League All-Star team after posting a 9-2 record with seven complete games for Double-A Memphis. He became a coach, and was eventually named the Cubs' Minor League pitching coordinator, a post he held from '96-2006. He was promoted to the big league staff in '07 and is entering his 23rd season in the Cubs' organization. Warren County .ite soccer Senior High School in McMinnville saluted Strode's accomplishments when it retired his uniform number in 2006. "I guarantee [the principal] recalled what he said to me," Strode said. "It made me stronger." Davis tried himself to get to the big leagues. He pitched in the Cubs' Minor League system, starting in 1953, and was a teammate of Billy Williams at Ponca City in '57. Growing up in Tennessee, Strode watched the Braves and idolized Hank Aaron. As a p.ite soccer store player, he tried to fashion himself after pitcher Vida Blue because he "liked the way he went about his business." Strode has a good sense of baseball history. He knows the sacrifices black players made to pave the way for him. He's talked to Hall of Famer Williams about the tough times he had to deal with. Strode encountered his share of unenlightened folks. In Double-A, he remembers a fan yelling, "Boy, if it was a watermelon, you would've caught it." "I didn't have to live the life that some of my ancestors lived, but still it was tough times," Strode said. "I'm talking about the late '60s, early '70s. We were st

    ite soccer store

  71. Check out the tips here for your bachelor party and how that coincides with whats going on here. More info for all types of ideas located in Nashville Tn.
    رضا بهرام