FORBIDDEN STORY: In 2006, Ezra Klein told the tale!


Part 4—He told it exactly once:
This morning, on Morning Joe, Joe Scarborough made a pronouncement.

Bill Clinton’s forbidden take is “preposterous,” the rank Clinton-hater said.

For our money, Clinton omitted one key part of the story he told on CNN last weekend. Still and all, we strongly disagree with the view of this rank Clinton-hater.

We think Bill Clinton’s forbidden story is simply crawling with merit. Consider what Ezra Klein wrote, on one occasion, nine long years ago.

Klein was still amazingly young—just 21!—when he wrote The American Prospect’s cover story in April 2006. We’ll offer a guess at this point

His youth and inexperience may explain why he told the forbidden truth.

In his lengthy cover report, Klein considered the possibility that the new and improved Al Gore might seek the White House again in 2008. At the time, this notion struck us as highly unlikely, largely because of the forbidden story the youthful Klein told in his piece.

Good God! Right at the start of his lengthy report, Klein described a speech Gore had given in the fall of 2005. And good God!

Right there, in his second paragraph, Klein told the forbidden story!

Good God! According to Liberal Pundit Law, this wasn’t—still isn’t—allowed:
KLEIN (4/06): The most important speech of Al Gore's post–non-presidency was neither well-covered nor particularly dramatic. He delivered it against a plain blue curtain, and when he finished, the applause rippled but never roared. None in attendance, however, would have dared call it boring.

The address was the keynote for the We Media conference, held at the Associated Press headquarters in New York last October and attended by an audience that included both old media luminaries and new media innovators. In attendance were Tom Curley, president of the AP, Andrew Heyward, president of CBS News, and New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof, all leading lights of a media establishment that, five years earlier, had deputized itself judge, jury, and executioner for Gore's 2000 presidential campaign, spinning each day's events to portray the stolid, capable vice president as a wild exaggerator, ideological chameleon, and total, unforgivable bore.
Was Ezra Klein permitted to say that?

Rather plainly, the answer is no. But we’ll guess that he still didn’t know that.

Good lord! Right there in his second paragraph, Ezra told the actual truth about Campaign 2000!

As you can see, Klein told part of the larger forbidden story Bill Clinton told last weekend. Clinton told the story to Fareed Zakaria, who reacted by playing it dumb.

(Zakaria to Clinton: “You think it's a Republican plot, really?” Correct answer: No, Code-of-Silence Breath! He said it’s an unholy alliance between the GOP and your own mainstream press corps!)

(“I think you know what happened,” Bill Clinton had said at the start of the session. When his host responded by playing it dumb, we suspected Bill Clinton was right!)

Let’s return to that cover story in April 2006:

What forbidden things did Ezra Klein say in the passage we’ve posted? With perfect accuracy, he said such things as these:

He correctly said that the “media establishment” had done an astonishing thing in its coverage of Campaign 2000.

He named the types of news orgs he had in mind—CBS News, the Associated Press, even the New York Times!

What did Klein say those news orgs had done?

He said the media establishment had “deputized itself judge, jury, and executioner for Gore’s 2000 presidential campaign.” It almost sounded like Klein was describing gross journalistic misconduct!

According to Klein, how had news orgs like the Times acted as “executioners” during that fateful campaign?

His portrait only got worse as Klein supplied the details! According to Klein, the nation’s elite news orgs had served as Candidate Gore’s executioners by “spinning each day’s events to portray the stolid, capable vice president as a wild exaggerator, ideological chameleon, and total, unforgivable bore.”

Just for the record, this spinning began in March 1999 and continued for twenty long months.

To state the obvious, Klein was painting an astonishing portrait of the press corps’ behavior. Rather plainly, he was describing gross misconduct on the part of our most important news orgs—gross misconduct in a fateful campaign which ended up being decided by a handful of votes.

Already, people were dead all over the world because of the way that campaign had ended up. And good God! Look at the astounding misconduct Klein had ascribed to the press!

Every word in Klein’s indictment was accurate, of course. At other points in his lengthy piece, he occasionally fleshed out his claims in a bit more detail. Examples:

In one of history’s greatest known understatements, he said Candidate Gore’s “misreported comments on the Internet’s lineage were unfortunate for his campaign.”

He referred to “the anti-intellectualism Gore experienced in 2000,” apparently “on the campaign plane.”

He said Gore wouldn’t run again if he judged that a new campaign would be “just another round of dodging media-narratives and churlish characterizations.”

(By way of contrast, he suggested that Gore might run in 2008 if he thought he come create “an issue-based endeavor that allows him to continue speaking out on matters of substance.”)

Let’s state the obvious. Klein didn’t even begin to record the endless ways those news org acted as “executioners” during Campaign 2000.

Given the endless “misreported comments” which drove the coverage of Campaign 2000—given the ubiquity of the “media narratives and churlish characterizations” which formed the framework for all their reporting—no one could have done so in a few thousand words, and that wasn’t Klein’s principal focus.

Still, Klein had drawn an astonishing portrait of the mainstream press corps’ behavior. Might we now share an astonishing fact?

Ezra Klein never mentioned this matter again, not even in his interviews for his cover report!

Why did Klein mention this astonishing press corps misconduct just once? We’re willing to take a small guess at this time.

We’re willing to guess that a certain young man was quickly told, by mentors or friends, that this story was forbidden. But at any rate, the remarkable, accurate story he told completely disappeared.

In 2006, at age 21, Klein had told an astonishing story. Here’s our question:

What kind of person comes along and tells such a story just once?

Tomorrow, we’ll try to answer that question as we conclude our forbidden report. And uh-oh!Looking at the current landscape, we’ll try to show you what can occur when our favorite, most famous millionaire liberals agree to such codes of silence.

We’ll try to show you how Ezra Klein’s story is the same story Clinton just told. That said, our ultimate question turns out to be this:

How is it even possible? How can it be that this “preposterous” story is so rarely told?

Tomorrow: The wages of silence


  1. Does B.S. have any love feelings for VP Biden? Perhaps we will find out when Biden declares his candidacy and HRC falls behind Sanders and Biden.

    1. Somerby seems to like Sanders. He hasn't expressed any support for Clinton. Since Biden is more similar to Clinton than Sanders, I suspect Somerby wouldn't be much of a Biden supporter either.

      HRC is not going to "fall behind" Sanders or Biden. Biden is too late to gain much traction and Sanders is not a viable candidate, except among college students and people at Daily Kos. I expect that HRC will overcome the media opposition and win the general election, albeit in a closer election than would otherwise have occurred. There are not enough conservatives to stop her. Democrats will close ranks behind her when she is nominated.

      Most of the electorate is not reading the NY Times and not following the email scandals or any of these other day-to-day happenings. They will make their decision based on more superficial things, like whether they are personally doing well financially, how the candidates look in their saturation ad campaigns, and how they do in the debates (where Clinton tends to shine). Many do not even know that Biden is VP and cannot name what state Sanders comes from. To them, Sanders looks like the old scientist in Back to the Future, and doesn't seem presidential, though he may be amusing. Or they'll vote against the Republican candidate because of the nasty things they've said about immigration or blacks or poor people -- remarks that are being repeated at the community level, because they are so ugly and aimed at them.

      Both Democratic and Republican women will vote for Hillary. That will be more true the more unfairly she is treated.

      This is how I see the election shaping up, based on a long lifetime of elections and being a political junky.

    2. @ 1:42

      Biden is the only Dem who beats all the leading GOP candidates. If Carly were to win the GOP nomination and ran against Biden, why wouldn't GOP & Dem women vote for Carly? You get the extra X chromosome without the baggage of Willie.

    3. Useless troll thinks polling now is relevant at election time. What a waste of Bozell's money.

    4. @5:46

      Polling means nothing which is why Dems are begging Biden to run and why HRC and Willie are apoplectic about Biden entering the race.

    5. Is the sky blue where you come from?

    6. @7:10

      When your privileges are restored and you get out of solitary confinement you will be delighted to discover the sky is still blue even where you are confined.

    7. When Brent Bozell gives you a raise, let me know.

    8. So cicero is saying the Dems have a problem with HRC's perceived lying, but Republicans have no problem with Carly's lying. i.e. Republicans don't care about the truth.

      Just like a conservative, always willing to agree with what liberals have been saying for 30 years*.

      * see the Tea Party agreeing that the GOP hasn't really been fiscally conservative, as another prime example.

    9. @3:45

      Dems have zero problem with HRC's lies. What they do have a problem with are her poll numbers. That is why there is a draft Biden contingent of liberals.

      Please cite these Carly "lies."

      The GOP hadn't been fiscally conservative during Bush 43 Administration. Not being fiscally conservative is a hallmark of liberalism.

  2. Replies
    1. @Perez

      "Hillary Clinton may feel like the press hounds and harasses her, but there’s one segment of the media from which she’s getting the kind of coverage you just can’t buy: women’s magazines.

      Better known for features like “10 ways to flatten your tummy” and lush fashion spreads, the magazines have been hiring well-connected Washington women lately in the hopes that having an inside political track will position them for could be a historic White House run."

    2. Today, one of the emails discovered among those supplied by Clinton is being used against her campaign.

      In her email she expresses her concern to a staff member about a change in the language on passport applications. This is being spun as a personal lack of support for gays. In the email, she states that she is worried about the heated questions that would be asked by conservatives during a congressional inquiry. She says nothing at all about gay marriage. She is clearly trying to avoid another firestorm of criticism, another conservative hissy fit. But it is being played in the press as ambivalence about gay marriage, while they disingenuously speculate about whether this will erode her support among gay voters.

      This is why it is unfair that Clinton had to turn over her emails, especially personal ones. As planned, the emails are being combed through and will be dribbled out in a steady stream of conservative criticisms, hit pieces, aided and abetted by the NY Times where today's story appears.

      This is so grossly unfair that I MUST send Clinton another campaign contribution, so that she will be able to run ads to counter the unfair tactics being used by conservatives in collusion with the mainstream media. That seems to be the only way to combat this journalistic and conservative malfeasance. I have noticed that on other websites the Clinton supporters have adopted this same response as a way to express their outrage.

    3. I might suggest that you also send a letter to L. Brent Bozell III, c/o Media Research Center, asking him to stop paying for trolls like cicero to infest political blogs such as The Daily Howler.

    4. @1:11,

      You are correct. What has happened is grossly unfair, extraordinary and unprecedented. I would wager more than 95% of the emails being released through this FOIA do not even meet the definition of Federal Record. (I keep saying this and I'm going to keep saying it, this is bullshit)

      There was no reason they had to release every single one of them. Some sense of judgment and reason should have been applied by those releasing these emails. Their own manual explicitly states that not every email need be preserved and those that are not Federal Records should be destroyed.

      But once again, Clinton Rules come into play. For her and only her, every goddamned email had to be released because Larry Klayman, racist lunatic backed by right wing billionaires wanted them. Fuck this.

      Secretary Clinton, in the middle of a campaign for POTUS, sucked it up and let it happen. Otherwise she would have been roasted by the press worse than she is now.

      Hillary for President is getting a few extra clicks from me and my family today.

    5. @mm

      As opposed to benighted lunatic (David Brock) backed by left wing billionaires ( Soros/Steyer ) that want HRC to extend the Obama Administration to a third term.

    6. "As opposed to delusional lunatic troll backed by right-wing pennypincher Brent Bozell to feign real insight."

      FTFY - next lame troll effort

    7. "to extend the Obama Administration to a third term."

      If only we could.

  3. It pales in comparison to the treatment pizza magnate Bernard Herman Cain receives.

  4. The Clintons haven't always followed the usual rules. E.g., no other President received oral sex in Oval Office. All the rest of Obama's cabinet used the government e-mail system for their official work, as the Obama White House had asked them to.* What's special about Hillary's e-mail decision is that she isn't getting away with her misbehavior.

    *See "White House says Clinton did not heed e-mail policy"

    1. cicero's blowup dollOctober 1, 2015 at 3:54 PM

      Resident lunkhead continues to lunk along in the "blue dress" era.

    2. D in C how do you know no other president received oral sex in the Oval Office?

      As far as the e-mail controversy, it's an utterly bogusmanufactured nothing story, that illustrates what's wrong with our media and political system. You sound like a complete sap when you act as if this is anything other than that.

    3. I tend to doubt Clinton was the only President to ever receive a BJ in the Oval Office. Legend has it Nancy Reagan was an especially gifted fellationatrix. During her studio days, capable of bringing a smile to the face of even the most discerning Hollywood playboy, or gruff studio exec. Hell, even Sinatra was said to drop by the White House on occasion in his later years for a sample of her skills. I suspect we've had more than a few randy First Families in the White House as it should be.

    4. @ Anonymous

      Willie was the first POTUS to lose his law license for lying under oath about autographing Monica's blue dress. At least JFK used the White House pool instead of the Oval Office to play slap and tickle with Fiddle & Faddle.

    5. Shorter cicero: if Bozell could see me now, he'd fire me again.

  5. Would Secretary of State John Kerry qualify as another Cabinet member?

    And what the fuck is wrong with you David? Are you keeping a diary of who had what form of sex and where in the White House. How the fuck would you know, you little voyeuristic cretin?

    WASHINGTON — Secretary of State John Kerry occasionally uses a private e-mail account to conduct State Department business, a department official acknowledged Wednesday, a disclosure that comes amid heightened scrutiny over how government officials secure potentially sensitive information.

    State Department spokesman John Kirby didn’t directly respond to a question about whether Kerry had ever sent or received classified information via his private account. Instead, in a statement, Kirby said: “With respect to any classified material, he regularly receives such material through properly safeguarded briefings and papers.”

  6. In response to a FOIA from Larry "the racist lunatic" Klayman, the State Department released 5 separate spam emails.

    You can't make this shit up.

    1. @mm

      Where are the ones about Chelsea's wedding and HRC's yoga mat?

    2. "Where are the ones about Bozell being so hard up that he employs the likes of cicero even if for bottlecaps and bubblegum wrappers."

      FTFY - you get what you pay for Brent

    3. From Reuters (more trivia):

      Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton once struggled to convince a White House operator that she was on the line, according to an email unearthed Wednesday.
      In the 2010 email to her close aide Huma Abedin, Clinton wrote that she wanted to reach out to a retiring congresswoman but was too distracted by the situation with the operator.

      "I'd like to call her," Clinton wrote.

      She added:

      But right now I'm fighting w the WH operator who doesn't believe I am who I say and wants my direct office line even tho I'm not there and I just have him my home # and the State Dept # and I told him I had no idea what my direct office # was since I didn't call myself and I just hung up and am calling thru Ops like a proper and properly dependent Secretary of State---no independent dialing allowed.

      The email was part of an end-of-the-month batch of Clinton communications released Wednesday. Because Clinton exclusively used a personal email as secretary of state, her emails were not initially included in government archives, and the State Department continues to release Clinton's messages on a rolling basis as she campaigns for president.

    4. "...the State Department continues to release Clinton's messages on a rolling basis as she campaigns for president."

      Classic State Dept. rat%ucking.

    5. Isn't the "classic rat%ucking" exactly what Hillary Clinton asked for when she said she wanted the State Dept. to make all her emails public?

  7. I know he's not part of the mainstream media but John Stamos, the actor has repeatedly taken to both print and broadcast media to speak about the treatment described here with great lucidity and passion. Meanwhile Somberby sits and stares as if it didn't happen. This is why I'm leaving the Democratic Party and putting all of my suwpport behind Herman Cain, pizza titan.

  8. mm -- your comment illustrates my point. In most organizations, (including the Federal Governmen) just watching porn in one's office is a firing offence. Also, sex with a subordinate is supposed to sexual harassment per se. I'm not saying that Clinton's affair with Monica in the Oval Office was grounds for impeachment. I'm saying that it was appalling behavior. It undermined the dignity of the Office of the President. That's a big loss.

    And, yet, Clinton seems to have lost little popularity. And, when I criticize his grossly inappropriate behavior, mm responds with an ad hominem attack, calling me a "little voyeuristic cretin."

    OTOH Clarence Thomas was accused of something much less serious -- supposedly crudely propositioning Anita Hill. There's no supporting evidence that this actually happened, and there are several good reasons to think think that accusation was false. Yet, Thomas will never be forgiven for his (alleged) bad behavior.

    "If liberals didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all."

    1. cicero's blowup dollOctober 1, 2015 at 7:16 PM

      Our resident sewer dweller wallowing in the septic tank that is his recollection of the 1990s.

    2. mm is going easy on you and is just being honest. I don't know about :little", but you are a voyeuristic cretin, among many other accurate characterizations of your lunacy.

    3. D in C, you said Clinton was the only president to have oral sex in the oval office. You ducked the question how you know that. The story about Clinton's junior high level relationship with Lewinsky was treated by the media like the biggest story since world war II. Clinton paid an enormous price for it. My impression is that if you check it out, Anita Hill's story was corroborated. My issue with Thomas isn't his alleged sexual harassment of Hill but that he was a terrible choice for a Supreme Court Justice. This constant whining by right wingers about a purported double standard is devoid of validity.

    4. What DinC is saying is that the corporate-owned media is liberal.
      If you want to support corporations, vote for the most liberal politician you can.

      Have I got that right, DinC?

  9. But your party most certainly did impeach President William J Clinton and in the process dragged this country through the mud and begging for them to stop to no avail. Just cause they could.

    The Republican Party: Batshit Insane and Incapable of Governing:
    Case Study No. 9764: Mr. Speaker

    On December 19, 1998, the House of Representatives impeached Bill Clinton on two charges related to his extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky. (The charges were for perjury and obstruction of justice.) The historic vote, and subsequent trial in the Senate, involved the work of three men who were elected Speaker of the House Of Representatives by the Republican majority, Newt Gingrich, Bob Livingston and Dennis Hastert.

    Newt Gingrich

    Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) led the push for Bill Clinton’s impeachment. Following a disappointing election in November 1998, he announced he was stepping down as Speaker and resigning from Congress.

    Gingrich later admitted that, while he was pushing for Clinton’s impeachment, he was engaged in an affair with a Congressional aide. “There were times when I was praying and when I felt I was doing things that were wrong. But I was still doing them,” Gingrich said in 2007. He later said the situation was “complex and, obviously, I wasn’t doing things to be proud of.”

    Bob Livingston

    After Gingrich announced his resignation, Republicans unanimously selected Rep. Bob Livingston (R-LA) to succeed him. Livingston represented the party as Speaker-elect in the led up to the impeachment vote.

    On the day of the impeachment vote, Livingston announced he was resigning following revelations that he had engaged in an extramarital affair. According to Hustler Magazine Publisher Larry Flint, who offered a reward for information about the sex lives of members of Congress, he “found four women who said they had been involved with Mr. Livingston over the last 10 years.”

    Dennis Hastert

    Following Livingston’s resignation, which occurred on the same day the House voted on impeachment, Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-IL) quickly gained support of the Republican leadership to succeed him as Speaker-designate. He began formally serving as speaker in January 1999, and held that role while the Senate conducted their trial on the articles of impeachment.

    On Thursday, Hastert was indicted on charges that he illegally structured $1.7 million in payments to an individual in an attempt to cover up prior misconduct. According to reports, the payments were allegedly intended to “conceal sexual abuse against a former male student he knew during his days as a teacher in Yorkville, Ill.” The LA Times also reported that “investigators also spoke with a second man who raised similar allegations that corroborated what the former student said.”

    1. You left out David "Diaperboy" Vitter, a piece of hypocritical work if ever there was one.

    2. Vitter was never prosecuted for his criminal behavior. It's very dangerous when a public official, in this case one of the highest law makers in the nation delves into the world of organized crime.

  10. Yes, AC the Lewinsky scandal was treated as a huge story, and IMHO properly so. It wasn't just the relationship. It was having sex in the Oval Office. If a President was caught having sex with his wife in the Oval Office, that would be shocking, or, it would have been shocking Before Clinton (BC). Then, there was the blatant lying to the nation, lookng directly at us on the TV screen. Integrity was considered essential for Presidents BC. From a legal POV, his admitted perjury in the Paula Jones lawsuit was important. Felonious behavior by Presidents was a no-no BC.

    Compare Clinton's misdeeds with the Republicans mm lists above. Clinton's behavior was more shocking because it took place in the Oval Office, because it involved perjury, and because he was President. The 4 Republicans were booted off the stage, and properly so. Clinton remained popular. I can't prove it, but I suspect that the media may have punished Gore for Clinton's misdeeds. I wonder whether Hillary is also getting worse media treatment because of what her husband did.

    1. I wouldn't even compare consensual sex between adults, regardless of where it occurs, with a teacher having sexual relations with an underage student. Even paying "hush" money, while presiding over the people's House of Representatives to conceal his crimes.

    2. D in C no, the story was overcovered to the extreme, a tabloid story wet dream. Clinton was outed by a perversion of the special prosecutor system. Which reporters, public figures and politicians, or average people are unfaithful at one time or another? We don't know because usually they don't have kenneth starr spending millions and millions year after year finding nothing until thanks to clinton's stupidity this thing fell in his lap.

    3. Where he's coming from:

      David finds pedophilia and attendant financial misdeeds covering it up to be LESS shocking than consensual adult relations.

      Please, never forget this about him. We all deserve to be reminded of it, often.

  11. Here's another theory. Maybe the media give Hillary a less than stellar treatment, because they don't like her. According to investigative reporter Ronald Kessler, she is truly unlikeable when she's off-camera:

    "Good morning, ma’am,” a member of the uniformed Secret Service once greeted Hillary Clinton. “F*** off,” she replied....

    Kessler writes flatteringly and critically about people in both parties. Regarding the Clintons, Kessler presents Chelsea as a model protectee who respected and appreciated her agents. He describes Bill as a difficult chief executive, but an easygoing ex-president. And Kessler exposes Hillary as an epically abusive Arctic monster. “When in public, Hillary smiles and acts graciously,” Kessler explains. “As soon as the cameras are gone, her angry personality, nastiness, and imperiousness become evident.” He adds: “Hillary Clinton can make Richard Nixon look like Mahatma Gandhi.

    Read more at:

    1. A buddy told me she routinely spits in the faces of uniformed service men and women for, in her words, "not letting the terrorists win".

    2. Internet troll: a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion,[3] often for their own amusement.

      (See David in Cal

  12. I heard she murdered Vince Foster.

  13. So Ezra in one sentence summarized the War on Gore but never mentioned it again. Isn't the War on Gore the part of the Forbidden Tale that Clinton never mentioned? Unless you count its inclusion in this broader description.

    Bill Clinton:

    "So this is just something that has been a regular feature of our presidential campaigns—except 2008, for unique reasons. Ever since Watergate, something like this happens."

  14. My Ex-Husband Broke My Heart. Here's How I Healed, My name is Michelle Robert from USA, i am testifying to the general public how my married was restored back by the great power's of Chief Nwaluta Mallam Zack after heart broken, My husband and I are both directors and shareholders in our family business. We have been married for 20 years but my husband is now going for a divorce, i agreed in the first place but i later realized what happens to my family and what rights will I have in the business if my husband divorce me, and i have worked so hard for my family and this business, i was incomplete and wondered what to do because he already went to court. I was browsing on the internet when i saw a post on how a spell caster called Chief Nwaluta Mallam Zack helped someone bring back her ex, so i wondered if he can help me, i gave him the try and contacted him at his email, he told me not to worry that everything would be alright, i gave him the chance to cast the spell, he told me that in 48 hours my husband will come back and beg me, i never believed it at first, surprisingly completing 48 hours he came back and started to beg me not be to be annoyed about what he did, and now we are happy again. Thank you Chief Nwaluta Mallam Zack today my home is restored back if you are going through similar problem you can contact him at his private email {}.


  15. A broken marriage can be one of the most painful things to heal from and can take a very long time to heal. During these times it can feel like the whole world could light up in flames and it still couldn't compare to the pain inside. My name is Nicole Cottrell form UK, I have been in great bondage for almost 2 years suffering in the hands of a cheating husband, we were happy and leaving well until he meant his old time girl friend and he started dating her outside our marriage before you knew it he stopped caring and taking care of his own family to the extent that he was planning to get married to her and divorce me, i cried and reported him to his family but he never listened to any one but to cut my story short i came in search for a real spell caster who could destroy their relationship and make him come back to me and our 2 kids on my search i saw people making testimony on how their marriage where restored by Chief Nwaluta Mallam Zack i pick his email and i narrated my story to him and he agreed to help me and after performing a spell on the second day both of them had a quarrel and he beat his girlfriend up and he came home begging for me and our little kids to forgive him that his eyes are clear now that he will never do any thing that will hurt his family again and promise to be a caring father and never cheat again. I am so happy that i did not loose him to the girl. all appreciation goes to Chief Nwaluta Mallam Zack for he is a Great spell caster and to whom this may concern if you have a cheating husband or wife or you need your ex lover back again. you can as well email him on { } and this man made me to understand that there are only 8 real spell caster in Africa.


  16. Hello everyone i want to share a live testimony on how
    Dr orbo kosie was able to bring my husband back to me,
    myself and my husband were on a serious breakup,
    even before then we were always quarreling fighting
    and doing different ungodly act.. My husband packed
    his things out of the house and we had to live in
    different area, despite all this i was looking for a way to
    re_unite with my husband, not until i met Dr orbo kosie the
    great spell caster who was able to bring my husband
    back home, Dr orbo kosie cast a love spell for me, and after
    some time i started seen results about the spell....
    Today my family is back again and we are happy living
    fine and healthy, with Dr orbo kosie all my dream came
    through in re_uniting my marriage, friends in case you
    need the help of Dr orbo kosie kindly mail him on
    ( ) or call him on
    +2349081784898, Sir i will forever recommend you

  17. Take every chance you get in life, because some things only happen once
    Cara Mengobati Nyeri Ulu Hati Seperti Ditusuk Tusuk

  18. 5 years ago I had warts, I was treated with some liquid applied to the warts they continued to grow and spread... The next 2 doctors did laser surgery to remove them. 1 year after the surgery, they grew back close to where the 1st ones were' so I was finally told it was hpv. I have had it for very long time, I contract it from my cheated boyfriend and I found out he was also infected and I end up the relationship between us. the warts was so embarrasses because it started spreading all over I have be dealing with this things for very long time the last treatment I take was About 2 years ago I applied natural treatment from Dr onokun herbal cure, a week after applying the treatment all the warts was gone. it's now 2 years and some months I don't have single wart or any symptoms of hpv. wow"" it's great, Dr onokun has finally cured me. Anyone living with hpv contact Dr onokun for natural treatment.
    His email address: