Major professor crashes and burns!


Gitlin emulates Trump:
Almost surely, Donald J. Trump is our least articulate modern president—and you can start the "modern" era pretty much wherever you please.

Briefly, let's be fair. In part, the problem stems from the fact that Donald J. Trump rarely knows what he's talking about. During the campaign, he promised "something terrific" in health care, full stop.

Almost surely, Donald J. Trump was holding back no details. Donald J. Trump rarely seems to know what he's talking about.

For whatever reason, Donald J. Trump is highly inarticulate. At Bill Moyers and Company, and then again at Salon, Professor Gitlin has now pretended to discuss this state of affairs.

We say "pretended" for a reason. Professor Gitlin's critique of Trump is almost as weirdly incompetent as a typical Trump remark. When it comes to incompetence and disingenuinity, Professor Gitlin seems to be emulating President Trump.

We've often said that the liberal world has been failed by our professors. Professor Gitlin, a major professor, has now established us as a major seer.

Professor Gitlin starts his critique is a sensible way. The bulk of what's said here is accurate:
GITLIN (3/27/17): Once upon a time, there were presidents for whom English seemed their native language. Barack Obama most recently. He deliberated. At a press conference or in an interview—just about whenever he wasn’t speaking from a text—his pauses were as common as other people’s “uh’s.” He was not pausing because his vocabulary was impoverished. He was pausing to put words into sequence. He was putting phrases together with care, word by word, trying out words before uttering them, checking to feel out what they would sound like once uttered. It was important to him because he did not want to be misunderstood. President Obama valued precision, in no small part because he knew he lived in a world where every last presidential word was a speech act, a declaration with consequence, so that the very statement that the sky was blue, say, would be scoured for evidence that the president was declaring a policy on the nature of nature.

That was then. Now we have a president who, when he speaks, spatters the air with unfinished chunks, many of which do not qualify as sentences, and which do not follow from previous chunks. He does not release words into a stream of consciousness but into a heap. He heaps words on top of words, to overwhelm meaning with vague gestures. He does not think, he lurches.
The fawning about Obama's speech acts is overdone, but it's followed by an accurate assessment of the verbal lurches of Donald J. Trump. That said:

From this point on, Gitlin offers one of the most incompetent essays we've ever seen from a major professor. This guild has failed us persistently, but never in a more embarrassing manner than this.

From this point on, the professor undertakes to offer examples from Donald J. Trump's recent interview with Time magazine's Michael Scherer. These examples are meant to show how incoherent our president is.

Here's how Gitlin limns it:
GITLIN (continuing directly): Here are some examples from Time’s transcript of their cover story made out of their phone interview with the president of the United States. I have italicized the non sequiturs, incomplete propositions, indefinite pronouns and other obscurities that amount to verbal mud.
The professor says he has italicized the various parts of Trump's remarks which amount to verbal mud. Unfortunately, Gitlin's analytical effort is more incompetent than the bulk of what Trump is said to have said during his interview.

Why do we say "said to have said?" Let's mention some facts our ranking professor doesn't seem to know:

You can't automatically trust a news org's transcript! The contemporary journalistic transcript is frequently riddled with errors. Anyone who has ever tried to be fair about public figures' spoken remarks will, of course, already understand this.

In what ways can a transcript fail? Let us count the ways, reaching the number two:

First, news org transcripts frequently misstate the actual words which were said. The only way to guard against this possibility is to check the transcript against a videotape of the spoken remarks.

We routinely engage in that basic type of fact-checking at this site. It's time-consuming and annoying, but it's also important. News orgs frequently misrecord the words which were actually said.

In this instance, Time has provided no videotape of the interview. There is no way to know that the words which appear in Time's transcript are the words Trump actually said.

It may well be that Time transcribed Trump's words with special care, but there's no way to be sure about that. Such conduct isn't the norm.

In this instance, a second problem is transparently clear. Quite plainly, Time has made little attempt to punctuate the various things Trump said.

In this omission, Time flirts with journalistic malpractice. Especially with a herky-jerky speaker like Trump, you have to try to be fair in punctuating the stops and starts which are common in extemporaneous speech.

Plainly, Time made virtually no attempt to do that. For that reason, the muddiness of Time's transcript falls on Time itself, as well as on Donald J. Trump. And again:

There is no way to feel sure that you're reading the words Donald J. Trump really said.

Professor Gitlin shows no sign of knowing any of this. He proceeds to author his own remarkable howlers—howlers he generates by pulling bits of Trump's (reported) remarks completely out of context.

(This resembles the slippery practice, familiar to cable viewers, known as "the Maddow edit.")

In a rational world, Gitlin's work would earn any college undergraduate a failing grade. (Just for the record: He doesn't just italicize chunks of Trump's remarks. He publishes two separate words in bold type without ever explaining why.)

In puzzling fashion, Gitlin offers slivers of the transcript, including two slivers by Scherer. He doesn't show where he has made omissions in the transcript, a transcript for whose accuracy he can't vouch in the first place.

Having engaged in these schoolboy errors, our laziest, least competent major professor then proceeds to tell the world that he has let us see the incoherence of Trump!

Trump is often barely coherent. In this embarrassing essay, Professor Gitlin is worse.

We'll limit ourselves to one example. Below, you see Gitlin's first example of Trump's alleged incoherence. Italicization by Gitlin:
SCHERER: So you don’t feel like Comey’s testimony in any way takes away from the credibility of the tweets you put out, even with the quotes?

TRUMP: No, I have, look. I have articles saying it happened. But you have to take a look at what they, they just went out at a news conference.
There you see the professor's full example. And sure enough! From that sliver of text, it's hard to tell what Donald J. Trump was talking about in the italicized passage.

Below, you see the fuller chunk from Time magazine's transcript (bold emphases by us; bracketed insertion by Time). Just like that, Trump's allegedly murky meaning becomes remarkably clear:
TRUMP: And today, [House Intelligence Committee Chairman] Devin Nunes just had a news conference. Now probably got obliterated by what’s happened in London. But just had a news conference, and here it is one of those things. The other one, election, I said we are going to win, we won. And many other things. And I think this is going to be very interesting.

SCHERER: So you don’t feel like Comey’s testimony in any way takes away from the credibility of the tweets you put out, even with the quotes?

TRUMP: No, I have, look. I have articles saying it happened. But you have to take a look at what they, they just went out at a news conference. Devin Nunes had a news conference. I mean I don’t know, I was unable to see it, because I am at meetings, but they just had a news conference talking about surveillance.
We've asked our analysts, and several agree. It's possible that even Maddow herself wouldn't doctor a statement that badly!

(For the record, Time's printed text would probably be more clear with a stronger attempt at punctuation.)

Amazing, isn't it? The meaning of Trump's reference was made perfectly clear, right before and immediately after the sliver of text Gitlin offered. To help us gape at Trump's incoherence, Gitlin simply omitted the words which made his reference clear.

As presented, Trump's remarks are still choppy and grammatically imperfect. But that's routinely true of the extemporaneous speech of politicians and journalists—and there's no way to know how that transcript would look if it could be edited against the actual videotape.

The liberal world tends to run on fuel presented by major professors. For years, we've tried to tell you that you've been failed by these major professors.

Few professors have misbehaved as badly as Gitlin now has. That first example was an outright con. Similar nonsense followed.

Our culture suffers under the regime of these overpraised, overpaid professors. Our culture is being destroyed by the Trumps, but by the Gitlins as well.

The professor's typos: Many of Gitlin's examples gain by this type of editing. If an undergraduate performed such work, it would merit a failing grade.

Then too, we have the professor's typos. After his doctored examples are done, he launches into the passage shown below. We have inserted two [sic]s:
GITLIN: So it goes.

Now, TIME’s cover headline for this mishmash is pointed as well as clever: “Is Truth Dead?”—clever, at any rate, in the eyes of readers old enough to remember the 1966 prototype: “Is God Dead?” A still more pointed treatment is that of Ellie Shechet at Jezebel—a redaction, or what be [sic] called reporting by subtraction. In the words of headline [sic], “We Redacted Everything That’s Not a Verifiably True Statement From Trump’s Time Interview About Truth.” Unsurprisingly, Jezebel ended up having to edit the transcript so that the passages blacked out were lengthier than the words left in.
Everyone makes typos, of course. That said, Professor Gitlin's typos remain in print, at the Bill Moyers site and at the new Salon.

Given his doctored claims about Trump's vast incoherence, the professor's uncorrected bungles may carry a special weight.

Long ago and far away: In November 1999, Cal Thomas "quoted" Naomi Wolf in a similar way. In his nationally syndicated column, he removed all punctuation from one of her spoken remarks, inviting readers in hundreds of newspapers to marvel at her incoherence.

Wolf was being viciously, misogynistically slimed at the time, all across the American "press corps." We can't name a single professor who ever returned from the south of France to issue a word of complaint.

The sliming of Wolf sent Bush you-know-where. The sliming itself was an oozing disgrace. Did any professor complain?


  1. Trump is incoherent, even if you can occasionally use context to project meaning onto his word salad. Gitlin is held to a ridiculous standard so that Somerby can castigate all professors. Why is it incompetent to assume that a transcript is reasonably accurate? Somerby treats Gitlin the same way.

    1. Perhaps Bob is suggesting that the professor's motive and conclusion is petty and ill-advised. It betrays that same old superiority our tribe is known for. We geniuses. Of course, I could be wrong.

    2. I don't see his analysis as based solely on grammar. Somerby chose that to focus on. Disordered speech and writing do reflect disordered thinking and they do mean something, independent of lapses in spelling or minor grammar errors. Trump is failing at the level of meaning, not breaking trivial grammar laws. Reducing Gitlin's analysis to that is massively wrong.

      Somerby knows how to parse meaning; semantics and semiotics are important to philosophy. This is beneath him.

    3. Deterioration of language ability is part of how they traced Reagan's Alzheimer's back through his public appearances when the family would only admit he had it in the late stages. Trump is worse.

      If the average person identifies with someone who is as abnormal in his mental functioning as Trump, there is something very wrong with our country. The average guy on the street does not speak like Trump. If he did, his friends would be treating him as "special."

  2. I like Bob's attacks on librarians better.

  3. The more the media invites "professors" to critique Trump's lack of proper grammar, the more his support will grow.

    You still refuse to learn.

    1. If you don't think it is a problem that this man's grown children must go everywhere with him to keep him out of trouble, you don't care who holds the office as long as it is someone from your party.

      Trump uses the word "stuff" so often, and words like "great" or "beautiful" because he has an impoverished vocabulary and cannot think of specific words to describe his thoughts. I believe he has dementia and cannot process any kind of complexity. He repeats patterns and fragments he has memorized and never responds explicitly and specifically to anything. It is very sad but he is clearly incompetent mentally and it will get worse, to the point that it becomes obvious to even his family and supporters, if he doesn't resign first. It was unkind to put him into this situation.

    2. maj is right about one thing. You need to keep hammering on Trump and his voters that we know they love bigotry.
      Anything less is a dereliction of duty (to progress).

    3. One of Trump's handlers told him he overused two words, and it would be better if he didn't use them so much. One was tremendous and the other was terrible.
      Trump said he would try to cut down, then asked what the two words were.
      Yeah, I know it's old.

  4. Someone here keeps suggesting that Somerby is jealous of Rachel Maddow's career. I think he is jealous of people who went on in graduate school and pursued academic careers. His buddy Al Gore didn't earn high grades. Probably Somerby didn't either. Being smart, he thinks he could do what professors do, but just didn't want to, and he never misses an opportunity to dump on some person who dared to express an opinion based on their academic expertise. Somerby has no area of expertise, he has no respect for other people's hard work, research or learning, and he thinks professors should be something they are not, while complaining when they exhibit human errors.

    There is no excuse for this. Gitlin is right and Somerby is making a fool of himself with his distortion of Gitlin's argument and petty complaint that the transcripts were wrong (how exactly is that Gitlin's fault?).

    Phooey on this, Somerby.

    1. Not realizing and disclosing that your source is extremely likely to be problematic is quite fundamental.

      Thinking you can overlook that be invoking an appeal to authority is pathetic.

    2. Perhaps if there were surviving video tape anywhere of Trump speaking extemporaneously at some other point in time Gitlin would not have had to make his case using this particular transcript. This is a problem historians who analyze nineteenth century politicians run into all the time.

    3. Somerby dislikes professors and he dislikes Maddow. The intersection of those two sets is possession of a PhD.

    4. I have read transcripts by people like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck and decided they we gibberish. When I listened to the tapes, however, I understood the points they were trying to get across. I didn't agree with their conclusions, and noted errors in facts and logic. But the pauses, inflections, sarcasm, etc. came across in speech, but often not in transcripts.
      Whether you understand or not the denotation in transcripts doesn't mean Trump's listeners don't get the message he is sending.

  5. Hey guys, Real and genuine spell caster to get ex back fast .
    I'm so excited my broken Marriage has been restored and my husband is back after a breakup, After 2 years of marriage, me and my husband has been into one quarrel or the other until he finally left me and moved to California to be with another woman. i felt my life was over and my kids thought they would never see their father again. i tried to be strong just for the kids but i could not control the pains that torments my heart, my heart was filled with sorrows and pains because i was really in love with my husband. Every day and night i think of him and always wish he would come back to me, I was really upset and i needed help, so i searched for help online and I came across a website that suggested that Dr Unity can help get ex back fast. So, I felt I should give him a try. I contacted him and he told me what to do and i did it then he did a (Love spell) for me. 28 hours later, my husband really called me and told me that he miss me and the kids so much, So Amazing!! So that was how he came back that same day,with lots of love and joy,and he apologized for his mistake,and for the pain he caused me and the kids. Then from that day,our Marriage was now stronger than how it were before,All thanks to Dr Unity. he is so powerful and i decided to share my story on the internet that Dr Unity real and powerful spell caster who i will always pray to live long to help his children in the time of trouble, if you are here and you need your Ex back or your husband moved to another woman, do not cry anymore, contact this powerful spell caster now. Here’s his contact: Email him at: ,
    you can also call him or add him on Whats-app: +2348071622464 ,
    his website: .
    Jessica, 26 years, Texas, USA.

  6. Bob's deterioration seems to be advancing. I just hope someone is looking after him.

  7. "Rachel Maddow’s a real piece of work!

    The silly dissembling rolls on: Rachel Maddow’s a real piece of work.

    We don’t mean that as a compliment.

    Her ridiculous clowning on TV never seems to stop.
    Maddow had uncovered more lying! According to Maddow, Baroni’s failure to tell the truth in this instance was “really egregious.”
    For ourselves, we located those 77 pages this morning because of last night’s TV show. We were surprised by what we found—although we didn’t find Baroni denying that backups occurred.

    Here’s what we did find:

    We found Baroni making a tedious presentation about a traffic study he said Wildstein and others had conducted. We found him making detailed claims about what the study had found.

    We found members of the legislature challenging the wisdom of the idea that one or more access lane from Fort Lee should perhaps be closed. But we found no one claiming that Baroni had denied the fact that traffic backups occurred.

    Most surprisingly, we found no one who seemed to doubt that some sort of “study” occurred."

    Bob Somerby

    Bill Baroni today was sentenced to two years in prison.

    1. Not reported by Somerby, was it? He's like Trump: never back down, always attack, never admit error.

    2. Also like Trump - when challenged, doubles down.

  8. Hello,
    I Read the article of a very great spell caster and it seems very helpful
    to me. I haven’t had the chance to have a proper relationship with my ex
    because we work together. This will be the final week or work and then I
    wont be around him constantly. Unfortunately, I broke one of the rules in
    the article and have been sleeping with him. Something I’m not proud of,
    especially since he has a girlfriend. Not to mention that she’s a girl he
    dated off and on for 3 years before he dated me.
    When I asked him why he kept sleeping with me even though he was in a
    relationship, his response was because I wanted it, and he wants me to be
    happy. But obviously what would make me happy would be to have him all to
    myself. That was when i read about Dr alexzander on how he help people in
    saving their relationship and i was really desperate for his help. There
    were things in our relationship that were tough. We traveled for 4 months
    right in the beginning, and it was hard due to different expectations. When
    we returned our living situation was unstable which caused a lot of stress
    on my end. And when I ask why he didn’t give me a chance to make things
    better he said he gave me tons of chances. Oh, and he compared our
    relationship with his past. He says that things were great, and then they
    went bad really fast, and that why his back with is Ex. Because it at least
    took them years for things to get that bad. So i was very sad and
    disappointing and decided to contact this spell caster for help with tears
    running out of my eyes and Dr alexzander promised to make things right in
    my relationship and also assured me that my boyfriend is going to come back
    to me within 78hrs. At first i was shock and didn't believe him because i
    thought it was impossible to do. But i gave it a try and trusted him. Dr
    alexzander asked for my details and his, then guarantee me of his return.
    Truly my ex lover started calling me and also begging me to forgive him and
    that's his willing to give us a second chance, then promised me never to
    love any other woman apart from me. it all seem like a miracle to me till
    now. Dr alexzander. Words can't express how i feel right now. it been 2
    month now since you caste that love spell for me and nothing have gone bad
    between us. his now caring more than ever and also the loving kind of Man i
    have ever wanted for myself in life. I thank you Dr alexzander for saving
    my relationship. Indeed you are the best. I want to use this media to share
    my testimony for the whole world to see and know that there is still hope
    in your broken relationship, No matter how bad it seems don't give up hope
    and also contact this man who saved my own. you can reach him through his
    website address or contact him
    direct with his email address I thank you
    Dr alexzander for helping me and i will always share my testimony in every
    social media or place i may go to.
    (From United State Of America).
    Mrs Tracy Grilli.

  9. My husband and I have been married for 3 and a half years. In June it will be 7 years that we have been a part of each other lives. Recently he found out about a guy I slept with when we were separated and I did not tell him about. Before we got married we both agreed to let everything out and start fresh. I didn’t tell him. I was embarrassed bc the guy and I never actually had sex…just everything that led up to it. not to mention it was my brothers best friend and a huge mistake. well it came out recently along with some lies. A friend told my husband I cheated on him and I have never cheated on my husband nor would I ever. He is convinced I am a cheater. we have 2 beautiful kids and all I have ever wanted is a happy family. my kids and my husband truly are my everything. I can not see a future where my husband is not in it. I want to do whatever I can to save my marriage but I feel my husband is already set on the divorce. I know I could have been a better wife to him….a wife he deserves but now I fee like I have realized it too late. I look at my kids and I hate myself for allowing myself to break my family apart. I know my husband is not perfect and he has hurt me tremendously these past 5 years we have been off and on but we made it through for a reason. I love him and I want to save my marriage, one day a friend of my introduce me to a spell caster online who lift me up gave me hope and with-in 2 days after his spell my husband who told me he needed a divorce, called me and take me back home to me i must say today we are happily as one big family again all thanks to Dr happy a father and a real spell caster.Contact email address Call and Whats-App him +2348133873774 Also contact and know more about his service at

  10. Professor Todd Gitlin is indeed a major professor. Here are his credentials:

    "He holds degrees from Harvard University (mathematics), the University of Michigan (political science), and the University of California, Berkeley (sociology). He was the third president of Students for a Democratic Society, in 1963-64, and coordinator of the SDS Peace Research and Education Project in 1964-65, during which time he helped organize the first national demonstration against the Vietnam War. During 1968-69, he was an editor and writer for the San Francisco Express Times, and through 1970 wrote widely for the underground press. He is presently a member of the board of directors of Greenpeace USA.

    He was for sixteen years a professor of sociology and director of the mass communications program at the University of California, Berkeley, and for seven years a professor of culture, journalism and sociology at New York University. During 1994-95, he held the chair in American Civilization at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales in Paris. He has been a resident at the Bellagio Study Center in Italy and the Djerassi Foundation in Woodside, California, a fellow at the Media Studies Center, and a visiting professor at Yale University, the University of Oslo, and the University of Toronto. He is now a professor of journalism and sociology and chair of the Ph. D. program in Communications at Columbia University."

    Bob Somerby is nobody compared to this guy. This major professor said some true things about Trump. Somerby ignored those true things in favor of a major nitpick about the unfairness of critiquing Trump based on an imperfect transcript. Somerby has a point, but instead of considering whether Gitlin's points are valid despite the transcript, Somerby decided that those nitpicks invalidate Gitlin's whole message because in the past Wolfe was treated unfairly by a biased media. But the larger reason is that Somerby routinely attacks professors because they are imperfect human beings and they have feet of clay.

    In this case, the professor in question has a very strong record of involvement in social change. This is not an effete intellectual sitting by the sidelines. This guy has a great deal of liberal cred. Somerby is wrong to keep doing this and he is making himself look pathetic. If it eats at him that his own accomplishments are outshone by guys like Gitlin, he should see a therapist. They really can help.

  11. Two interesting items in the news today:

    1. Calexit appears to be a Russian ploy.
    2. Obama prevented Comey from releasing info about the investigation of Trump's campaign before the election, thereby putting Trump in office.

  12. I cant do anything else than to thank Dr. Okosun for the good spell work he did for me. I saw some reviews about his spells and i thought of giving his job a try and now i have found out that he is really experienced and perfect. I broke up with my husband after 3 years of marriage. We had series of quarrels that let to divorce and after the divorce i missed hi so dearly. I tried all i could to get him back but all to no avail, i tried everything until i got Dr. Okosuns email from the review others shared online. I contacted him for help and explained my marriage problems to him and he offered to he help me. I provided all that was needed for a quick love spell and to my greatest surprise it worked. I was at my office the next day when i received a call from my neighbor that my husband was at my home for me. I was so amazed when he came to my office and asked for re-union. Am so happy that my husband is back to me now and we are living more happier than ever. Thanks to Dr.Okosun for helping me get my marriage back to life, i recommend this spell caster to all out there facing marital and relationship problems, kindly contact Dr. Okosun for help now on DR.OKOSUNSPELLALTER@GMAIL.COM

  13. I cant do anything else than to thank Dr. Okosun for the good spell work he did for me. I saw some reviews about his spells and i thought of giving his job a try and now i have found out that he is really experienced and perfect. I broke up with my husband after 3 years of marriage. We had series of quarrels that let to divorce and after the divorce i missed hi so dearly. I tried all i could to get him back but all to no avail, i tried everything until i got Dr. Okosuns email from the review others shared online. I contacted him for help and explained my marriage problems to him and he offered to he help me. I provided all that was needed for a quick love spell and to my greatest surprise it worked. I was at my office the next day when i received a call from my neighbor that my husband was at my home for me. I was so amazed when he came to my office and asked for re-union. Am so happy that my husband is back to me now and we are living more happier than ever. Thanks to Dr.Okosun for helping me get my marriage back to life, i recommend this spell caster to all out there facing marital and relationship problems, kindly contact Dr. Okosun for help now on DR.OKOSUNSPELLALTER@GMAIL.COM

  14. I never believed in Love Spells or Magics until i met this special spell caster when i went to Africa to Execute some business. He is really powerful. My husband divorce me with no reason for almost 4 years and i tried all i could to have him back cos i really love him so much but all my effort did not work out, we met at our early age at the college and we both have feelings for each other and we got married happily for 5 years with no kid and he woke up one morning and he told me he’s going on a divorce, i thought it was a joke and when he came back from work he tender to me a divorce letter and he packed all his belonging from my house and left. i ran mad and i tried all i could to have him back but all did not work out. I was lonely for almost 4 year, So when i told the spell caster what happened he said he will help me and he asked for his full name and his picture. I gave him that. At first i was skeptical but i gave it a try cos i have tried so many spell casters and there is no solution, so when he finished with the readings, he got back to me that he’s with a woman and that woman is the reason why he left me, The spell caster said he will help me with a spell that will surely bring him back, but i never believe all this he told me i will see a positive result within 3 days. 3 days later, he called me himself and came to me apologizing and he told me he will come back to me. I can't believe this, it was like a dream cos i never believe this will work out after trying many spell casters and there is no solution. The spell caster is so powerful and after that he helped me with a pregnancy spell and i got pregnant a month later, we are now happy been together again and with lovely kid. This spell caster has really changed my life and i will forever thankful to him, he has helped many of my friends too with similar problem too and they are happy and thankful to him. This man is indeed the most powerful spell caster i have ever experienced in life. Am Posting this to the Forum in case there is anyone who has similar problem and still looking for a way out.. you can reach him here: CONTACT THIS POWERFUL SPELL CASTER TODAY VIA MAIL: or on +2348083221034

  15. OMG!! This is certainly a shocking and a genuine Testimony..I visited a forum here on the internet on the 20TH OF SEPTEMBER 2016, And I saw a marvelous testimony of this powerful and great spell caster called dr bante on the forum..I never believed it, because I never heard nor learnt anything about magic before.. Not a soul would have been able to influence me about magical spells, not until dr bante did it for me and restored my marriage of 8 years back to me and brought my spouse back to me in the same 48hours just as I have read on the internet..I was truly astonished and shocked when my husband knelt down begging for forgiveness and for me to accept him back.. I am really short of expressions, and I don't know how much to convey my appreciation to you dr bante , you are a God sent to me and my entire family.. Here is ..... His Email: or call him or whatsapp him +2347059073543